ML20062B420

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Response to Encl Comments on 820628 Physical Security & Guard Training & Qualification Plans.Response in Form of Revised Pages Requested within 30 Days of Receipt of Ltr
ML20062B420
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 07/30/1982
From: Miraglia F
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Tallman W
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
References
NUDOCS 8208040478
Download: ML20062B420 (3)


Text

r 1

Y' 3 M B-oik w,g Docket Nos.: 50-443/444 Mr. William C. Tallman Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

)^

Public Service Company of New Hampshire P. O. Box 330 Manchester, New Hampshire 03105

Dear Mr. Tallman:

This is in response to the Public Service Company of New Hampshire (J. DeVincentis) letter of June 28, 1982 regarding the Seabrook Station Physical Security and Guard Training and Qualifications Plans. The staff has determined that additional inforcation and changes are necessary before approval of these plans can be granted. Please provide revised pages in respc n.e to the comments set forth in the enclosures within 30 days of receipt of this letter.

Sincerely,

,5i Frank J. Miraglia, Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

As stated cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION w/ enclosures:

Docket File EMcPeek without enclosures:

NRC PDR p5 i

L PDR NSIC ACRS

~GMcCorkle I

LB#3 R/F JLee LWheel er Region I pan (ery)n SEE ATTACHED PAGE FOR CONCURRENCES 07FICE ) hb.ikhhh.

....h d...

. ~.bb bbN)..

....bb:

.h)..

)..

.. q b o g,,,,,,

,y,,,a g,,,r, a

e,,,,,,,,

,,,,,, y,,,,,,9,p, g,,,

sunc e 8208040478 820730 DR ADOCK 05000 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usm u m -33 w o

5

' ENCLOSURE-50-443/444 SEABROOK STATION GT&Q PLAN REVISION 2 COMMENTS Page Section Comment 3

1. 2.1. 2 It is unclear why the CAS operator is singled

'S out from the Security Force hile the SAS opera-w tor and Guard Island officer are not.

Defini-tions of CAS, SAS and Guard Island officers to include responsibilities, response duties and armament would be helpful.

6 1.5 Agai,n, it is unclear why the CAS operat6r is singled out ; however, depending on the answer to the above comment, CAS operator should be added to the last sentence for consistency.

5&6

'1.4 Contractor Security personnel should also be subject to physical fitness qualification and

..... n..._

. requalification.

It is not clear that this.

is the case.

Please clarify.

7 2.0 There should be a paragraph in this section which outlines the Contract Security Force training requirements in accordance with Appendix B, Part II.C.

17 Task 2 Annotation of the Access Log should be in-cluded in this task.

20 Task 8 This task should also contain the requirement to demonstrate the maintenance of continued observation of an individual during escort.

.21 Task 10 Dele'te the phrase "as accessible."

Inasmu'ch as 5 73.55(d)(4) requires that these areas be searched prior to entry, guards should be required to demonstrate the ability to do so.

22 Task 11 This task should include. demonstration of key i

control when vehicle is secured.

23 Task 14 This task should include the requireme.nt to demonstrate site familiarity and ability to inspect barriers and doors.

32 Task 31 What Vital Area doors are not controlled by card readers? How is access controllsd?

Task 48 This. task should contain calibration testing as well.

Testing of x-ray equipment should also be included either in this task or a, separate one.

~

1 g.

ENCLOS'URE

/

- i.

50-443/444 i

SEABROOK STATION PHYSICAL SECURITY PLAN REVISION 2 COMMENTS Page Section Comment 25 4'.25

' The stated 96-inch criteria 1s applied only to protected area barrier penetrations un-der the protected area perimeter.

Please apply this criteria to any possible pene-tration through the protected area barrier.

A 45 6.10.2.2 A possible five day delay in the rotation of security keys, combinations, radlocks.

lock cylinders and key cards upcn a con-

-firmed compromise or foss is excessive Immediate rotation is called fer, therefore.

p.

- - reword this section accordingly _._._

47 7.1. 2 Define access controlled as used in this

  • ,ce.

63 13.2

. ovide an additional commitment for performance testing at the beginning and end of each period the equipment is used for security.

Provide a commitment in this Chapter that all security equipment will be maintained in an operable condition.

l I

i l

O e

3 l

I l

O e

hr