ML20062A371

Notice of Violation from Insp on 811211-820226

ML20062A371
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	04/28/1982
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062A354	List: IR 05000400/1982003 ML20062A353 ML20062A357 ML20062A362 ML20062A371
References
50-400-82-03, 50-400-82-3, NUDOCS 8208030702
Download: ML20062A371 (1)

Text

s., ,;. - . .

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Docket No. 50-400 Shearon Harris License No. CPPR-158 Based on the results of the NRC investigation conducted on December 11, 1982 to February 26, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement

. Policy 47 FR 9987 (March 9, 1982), the following violations were identified.

A. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVIII, as implemented by section 1.8.5.17 of the PSAR, require that inspection records identify the individuals who performed the inspection.

Contrary to the above, a welding inspector signed inspection records indicating he had inspected welds and found them acceptable when, in fact, the welds had been inspected by other individuals and he had not personally inspected the welds.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).

B. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II, as implemented by section 1.4.9 (1.58) of the PSAR requires the licensee to comply with ANSI N45.2.6-1973.

Contrary to the above, the licensee did not comply with section 2.2 of ANSI N45.2.6-1973 in that two individuals performed weld inspections before they were certified by the licensee as being qualified to perform the assigned work.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).

l Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or

! denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

1 APR 2 8 1962 Date:

l l

O O y PDR

• t ._