ML20059G186

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 931018-22.Violation Noted: Licensee Failed to Conduct 1991/1992 Requalification Program within Two Year Requirement
ML20059G186
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/01/1993
From: Ring M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20059G173 List:
References
50-155-93-18, NUDOCS 9311080029
Download: ML20059G186 (1)


Text

.

4 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Licensee: Consumers Power Company Docket No.

50-155 Facility:

Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant License No. DPR-6 During an NRC inspection conducted October 18-22, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1993), the violation is listed below:

10 CFR Part 50.54(1-1) requires, in part, the licensee to have in effect, within three months after issuance of an operating license, an operator requalification program which must as a minimum meet the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55.59(c).

10 CFR Part 55.59(c) requires, in part, a requalification program that is conducted for a continuous period not to exceed two years.

Contrary to the above, as of October 22, 1993, the licensee failed to conduct the 1991/1992 requalification program within the two year requirement, in that all the required requalification training for the 1991/1992 requalification program was not provided to all licensed operators.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR Part 2.201, Censumers Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555 with a copy to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III, 799 Roosevelt Road, Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspectors at the Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should j

be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and.should include for.

i each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, 1

an order or a demand for information may be issued as to why the license i

should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may i

be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated a Glen Ellyn, Illinois b 'O this /

day of /Jcs., 1993 Mark /A. Ring, Chisf Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety 9311000029 931101 PDR ADOCK 05000155 O

PDR q--,

9