ML20059D976
| ML20059D976 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/06/1992 |
| From: | Ward D Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20059D980 | List: |
| References | |
| ACRS-2846, NACNUCLE, NUDOCS 9311030054 | |
| Download: ML20059D976 (45) | |
Text
--
CERTIF1ED lYD.EES fp2 ip1M3
SUMMARY
MINUTES MEETING OF ACRS PLANNING AND PROCEDURES SUBCOMMITTEE - SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 BETHESDA, MARYLAND
Participants:
Committee D. A.
Ward, Chairman (Part time)
P.
G. Shewmon Chairman (Part time)
J.
C.
Carroll, Member R.
F.
Fraley, Member ACRS Staff R.
P. Savio S. Duraiswamy M.
F.
Lee M.
L. MacWilliams Eurpose:
This meeting was scheduled to discuss:
1)
Future ACRS Activities Discuss topics proposed for consideration by the full Committee (see Attachment A, pp.
1-18).
2)
Subcommittee Assianments - Replacement for D.
A.
Ward A
proposed list of revised subcommittee assignments to replace Dave Ward and adjust the related work load has been proposed (Attachment B, p. 19).
3)
Improved Staff Presentations to the Committee Members have made several suggestions to improve the effectiveness of NRC staff presentations to the Committee.
A proposed Guide for staff presentations has been prepared by Jay Carroll and Sam Duraiswamy (see Attachment C, pp. 20-23).
4)
Joint Subcommittee Meetina on Computers on September 22, 1992 Several foreign participants (estimated 20) will be involved in this meeting (sqq h ent D, pp. 24-26 for list).
DE"GNATED ORIGINAL.,
Ceri m M py 9311030054 921006 E"
{j
ll w
o L
i
{
We have. tentatively planned coffee and " doughnuts" during the meeting, lunch, and dinner for our foreign guests.
Estimated costs could run as high as $600.00 - $700.00.
A decision is needed'regarding the degree to which we should host such activities for this meeting.
5)
Conduct of Em,olovees
- ACRS Position Recardina
" Stock" Ownership by Committee Members NRC is reconsidering the provisions of 10 CFR Section 0.735-28a regarding prohibitions on
" stock" ownership by NRC employees and Special Government Employees (ACRS members) which prohibits them from owning stocks, bonds, or other security interests issued by any entity which is regulated by the NRC or engaged in the manufacturer, sale, construction, etc., of nuclear reactors (see Attachment E,
pp. 27-37 for detailed list).
The Committee has been asked by OGC (Attachment F, p. 38) for its views on whether members of the Committee should be subject to the stock ownership restrictions.
6)
Special Election of Member-at-Laroe for the Plannina and Erocedures Subcommittee ACRS Bylaws require the election of a Member-at-Large to the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee to replace Mr. Carroll when he assumes the position of Vice-Chairman on November 5, 1992.
7)
ADoointment of New Members A panel of prospective new members to fill the position that will be vacated when Mr.
Ward leaves the Committee (November 4,
1992) should be nominated as soon as practicable.
DELETION FOIA EX(b)(6)
INFORMATION everal other candidates have been proposed for consideration.
8)
Addressees for ACRS Reports - During the June ACRS meeting, the Committee endorsed a Guide to assist in deciding on Addressees for ACRS reports (see Attachment G, p. 39).
Dr. Lewis has proposed several changes to this Guide.
9)
Proposed Chances in ACRS Bvlaws 9.1) Suscension of Bylaws Alternate changes have been proposed by Dr. Lewis and Mr.
Carroll to suspend the ACRS Bylaws on specific occasions L
3 considered appropriate by the members.
9.2) Editina ACRS Reports During the August ACRS meeting the members agreed to limit " monday morning" editing of final draft reports approved by the Committee to:
Correction of minor factual errors, such as dates, names, places, etc.
(Note:
A serious misstatement or error of fact, that was not addressed by the Committee before final
- approval, that in the opinion of the Committee Chairman warrants deferral until the next meeting or rewording through collegial interaction of the members will be dealt with by the procedures described in Sections 4.3-2 and 4.3-3 of the Bylaws.)
Addition of a list of appropriate references that are the basis for the report and/or referred to in the body of the report.
Use of standard format Jay Carroll has requested Committee reconsideration of this decision.
Discussion / Conclusions 1)
Future ACRS Activities Attachment A,
pp. 1-18 was discussed and several changes proposed.
Members agreed to propose dropping Committee briefings on Reactor Pressure Vessel Upper Head Cracks (Item 4),
the Pilgrim Emergency Response Plan Demonstration (Item 8), and the NRC AIT investigation of the November 6, 1991 event at Millstone, Unit 2 (Item 27).
It was also noted that the FSER for the ABWR Final Design Certification has already slipped from early September to September 23, 1992.
The planned subcommittee meeting on September 23-24, 1992 will probably be cancelled.
A revised list of items will be provided for Committee consideration.
Q:
.i b'
4 2)
Revised Subcommittee Assicmments Members agreed to the proposed changes in Attachment B, p. 19 to replace Dave Ward and help equalize Tom Kress's workload.
3)
Imoroved NRC Staff Presentations Members endorsed Attachment C, pp. 20-23 for consideration by the full Committee.
4)
Joint Subcommittee Meetina on Computers - September 22. 1992 The potential cost of hosting this event was discussed.
The following plan has been suggested:
The Committee should arrange for coffee and doughnuts, and lunch during the meeting and cover the costs as necessary.
ACRS should make arrangements for dinner as appropriate for those remaining after the meeting but should not cover the costs for the foreign guests.
The ACRS staff should request financial support from the
+
NRC Office of International Programs.
To the degree necessary, all Committee members should contribute to cover costs not covered by International Programs, rather than only the members' participating in the subcommittee meeting.
It was agreed that Dr. Lewis should be asked for his views on this matter.
5)
Conduct of Emolovees - Restrictions on " Stock" Ownershio Members discussed the following alternate positions:
a)
No specific prohibitions on " stock" holdings (recusal from related ACRS activities would be required under Section 0.735-21, acts affecting a personal financial interest).
b)
Members would be permitted to hold those " stocks" which they had accumulated or earned (e.g, stock options) before their appointment to the ACRS.
They would be precluded from participating in Committee decisionmaking activities that would have a direct and predictable impact on the company.
Members would be precluded from buying " stocks" in other companies on the NRC prohibited list while they are members.
p r:
g; l'..
l (1
5 1
c)
Members would normally divest all holdings in regulated industries within a reasonable period of time after becoming a member. Exemptions could be granted to any of the above as appropriate on a case-by-case basis -(same as current restrictions).
Subcommittee members endorsed b) as the proposed ACRS position.
6)
Election of Member-at-Laroe to the Plannina and Procedures Subcommittee Members agreed that an election should be scheduled during the October meeting, consistent with the Bylaws (Section
)
7)
ADoointment of New Members DELETION FOIA EX(b)(6)
INFORMATION 8)
Addressees for ACRS ReDorts Members discussed changes proposed by Hal Lewis to Attachment G,
- p. 39, and their recommendations, as follows:
The section on Reports Addressed to the Commission does not include provision for an ACRS report to the Commission on matters where the Committee desires to do because of specific circumstances.
Members agreed to propose adding the following bullet to this section, i
i 6
Items where the Committee decides to send a
specific report to the Commission.
The second bullet under Reports Addressed to Office Directors precludes Committee reports directly to the Commission regarding staff technical deficiencies even where they are substantive in nature and should be brought to the Commission's attention.
Members concluded that the bullet added under Reports Addressed to the Commission covers this possibility.
The Note is a matter of Committee practice that should not be documented in this guide.
Members agreed to recommend deletion of this note.
I 9)
Editino ACRS Reports The members endorsed Mr.
Carroll's proposal regarding Committee action (Attachment L, pp. 62-63) for discussion with the Committee.
This proposal consists of the following:
1.
Rescind the motion passed on August 7,
1992 to limit staff editing of final draft reports.
2.
The past practice of staff and the cognizant subcommittee chairman editing be reinstated.
3.
The staff prepare a Committee procedure that clearly states that any~ changes made to a Committee report must be approved by the cognizant subcommittee chairmen and must not change the Committee's intended meaning at the time it approved the report.
In cases where the staff and ths cognizant subcommittee chairman cannot agree if a proposed change changes the Committee's intended meaning, the Committee chairman shall be consulted and shall resolve the disagreement.
In the case where he is the cognizant subcommittee chairman, the Vice-Chairman shall perform this function.
The procedure shall also state that the subcommittee chairman is ultimately responsible and accountable to the Committee for all changes that he approves.
10)
Suspension of ACRS Bylaws The two alternate proposals for suspension of the Bylaws were discussed briefly.
It was agreed to place both before the Committee during the September meeting and. vote during the October meeting, consistent with the Bylaws.
e i
I I
7 1
The alternate proposals are as follows:
Dr. Lewis proposed the following change to the Preamble:
"Any provisions of these Bylaws may be suspended for the purpose of a particular action, by unanimous vote of those members present and voting, who shall constitute a minimum of two-thirds of the membership of the Committee.
A motion to suspend the Bylaws shall take precedence over any other motion pending before the Committee."
Mr. Carroll proposed the following change:
"Any provisions of these Bylaws may be suspended for the purpose of a particular action, by two-thirds vote of those members present and voting, who shall constitute a minimum of two-thirds of the membership of the Committee.
A motion to suspend the Bylaws shall take precedence over any other motion pending before the committee."
11)
Miscellaneous The following additional items were discussed briefly:
11.1)
Dr. Lewis's BBS message to All Members (Really Dave Ward) dated August 13, 1992 regarding conduct of committee activities (Attachment K,
- p. 61).
No action was taken at this meeting.
1 11.2)
Members noted that Wildcat, Rev.
3, is now up and running on the BBS.
Several suggestions for improvements were made -
Assign separate " Conferences" to the ACRS and ACNW.
A " Find" feature to locate specific nuclear plants in Bulletins (4) and (5) would be useful.
An activity log of users that shows names and dates of the most recent BBS use would be useful.
When reading the mail, a specific message that states, "There are no more messages"-would'be useful.
It would be helpful to have Stan Schofer prepare instructions for a typical session
J 8
that includes reading bulletins, reading the
- mail, preparing a
message,.
uploading / downloading files, etc.
7
i I,
'~
[+a ceauq'o, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
3 E
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS
/[
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 o,
%, 4 *
- September 9, 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR:
P1 ning and Procedures Subcommittee 0
FROM:
R.
P.
Savio, Assistant Executive Director for Nuclear Reactors and Nuclear Waste
SUBJECT:
FUTURE ACRS ACTIVITIES - 390TH ACRS MEETING OCTOBER 6-10, 1992 Attached is a proposed list of topics for consideration by the Subcommittee.
A portion of the 389th ACRS meeting has been set aside to discuss this list and the Subcommittee's recommendations.
Attachment:
Future Agenda Items dated September 8, 1992 ATTACHMENT A
/
W ACRS AGENDA ITEMS I.
390TH ACRS MEETING. (OCTOBER 8-10, 1992)
Thd -eemmit. tee agreed to schedule the following matters for discussion during the October 8-10, 1992 ACRS meeting, except' noted otherwise.
[ Note:
Items identified by an
- have already been considered by the committee and appropriate course of actions have been recommended.
Unless there are new changes or there is a need for further discussion, these items may not have to be discussed.]
- 1.
Insichts from Common-Mode Failure Events (Open) (HWL/EGI)
ESTIMATED TIME:
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> The AEOD staff has provided a paper to the Committee on insights obtained from an analysis of selected common mode failure events and has offered the ACRS an informa-
- i tion briefing.
Dr. Lewis has recommended that the ACRS schedule this briefing. This briefing will be scheduled, time permitting, during the October 1992 ACRS meeting.
- 2.
Imolementation of the Safety Goal Policy With Reseect to Prioritizina Generic Safety Issues (Open)
(DAW /MDH)
ESTIMATED TIME:
1 1/2 hours The May.13, 1992 SRM resulting from the Staff's presenta-
)
tion to the Commission on the progress of resolution of generic safety issues states that:
"The staff should maintain its close contact with the ACRS and try to determine if ACRS has any objection to the implementation of the Safety Goal Policy with respect to setting priorities on GSIs.
The staff could move forward in this specific area, if ACRS has no objection, without waiting for the final ACRS report on the Safety Goal Policy."
The staff is in the process of developing a mechanism to prioritize generic issues taking into account the Safety Goal Policy and is prepared to brief the Committee regarding this matter during the October 1992 ACRS meeting.
- 3.
Environmental Oualification of Safetv-Grade Dicital Comouter Protection and Control Systems (Open) (HWL/SL/
DC) ESTIMATED TIME:
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> It was suggested during the June 16, 1992 meeting of the Subcommittee on Computers in Nuclear Power Plant Opera-
' : I, t
tions that the Committee consider preparing a letter on the status of the NRC sponsored research on environmental qualification of safety grade digital computer protection and control systems.
The Committee agreed during the July 1992 ACRS meeting to schedule a briefing on this matter.
Time permitting, a briefing will be scheduled during the October 1992 ACRS meeting.
I
~
- 4.
Reactor Pressure Vessel Uocer Head Cracks (Open/ Closed)
(PGS/EGI) ESTIMATED TIME:
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> g
Dr. Shewmon has recommended and the Committee has agreed
) to have the NRR staff brief the Committee regarding the A
i reactor pressure vessel upper head cracks observed in d
some European nuclear power plants and to discuss the reasons why the staff believes that similar problems will Mb not occur in U.S.
reactors.
Time permitting, this k
discussion will be scheduled during the October 1992 ACRS (meeting.
- 5.
Use of PRA by NRC Staff (HWL/MDH) ESTIMATED TIME:
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> The staff is prepared to brief the Committee on the status of the following tasks of the PRA Working Group Program Plan:
Task 1 - How is the staff using PRA?
e o
Task 2 - What limitations exist in present staff uses of PRA?
During the July 1992 meeting, the Committee agreed to hear this briefing.
This matter has been scheduled for the October 1992 ACRS meeting.
- 6.
Yankee Rowe Reactor Vessel Embrittlement (Open) (PGS/EGI)
ESTIMATED TIME:
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> The staff is establishing plans to develop and act upon lessons learned from the Yankee Nuclear Power Station (YNPS) reactor vessel embrittlement issue.
The staff action plan, including milestones and schedules was provided to the Committee.
The staff is prepared to i
provide an information briefing to the Committee.
Time for Committee discussions of this matter has been scheduled during the October 1992'ACRS meeting.
7.
Format and Content of Desian Certification ADolications (Open) (CJW/MME) ESTIMATED TIME:
2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />
X I,
)
i A proposed Regulatory Guide describing guidance for format and content for design certification applications has been provided to the ACRS.
During the December 1991 ACRS meeting, Mr. Wylie agreed to schedule a subcommittee i
meeting to discuss this matter after receiving the relevant documents.
Mr.
Wylie needs to schedule a Subcommittee meetina durina September to discuss this matter. This matter is tentatively scheduled for discus-sion during the October 1992 ACRS meeting.
8.
Information Briefina on the Pilarim Emeraency Response Plan Demonstration (Open) (JEW /EGI) ESTIMATED TIME:
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> s
The Committee decided during the January 1992 ACRS meeting to schedule a briefing on the Pilgrim Emergency Response Plan demonstration.
This briefing has been scheduled for the October 1992 ACRS meeting.
[ Note:
This was conducted almost a year ago.
Owing to lack of time, the Committee has been postponing this item since February 1992.
The Planning and Procedures Subcommittee needs to decide whether to hear this briefing or to drop it.]
- 9.
Branch Technical Position on Eauipment Oualification for License Renewal (Open) (DAW /TSK/EGI) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined The staff has provided this Branch Technical Position to the ACRS.
A joint meeting of the ACRS Subcommittees on j
Plant License Renewal and Reliability and Quality has been scheduled for September 16, 1992 to discuss this matter.
This matter will be scheduled for discussion during the October 1992 ACRS meeting.
10.
Onsite Analysis of the Human Factors AsDects of ODeratina Events (Open) (JCC/HA) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined The staff has provided a draft Commission paper to the Committee, describing the status of the staff work on the j
use of onsite evaluation team to analyze the human factors aspects of selected operating events.
The EDO i
has offered the ACRS an information briefing during the l
October 1992 ACRS meeting.
The Planning and Procedures Subcommittee and Mr. Carroll, Chairman of the Human Factors Subcommittee, have agreed to recommend a course of action after receiving the relevant document.
I l
i
" I, i
- 11.
Results of Pilot Simulator Examination Procram (Open)
(JCC/HA) ESTIMATED TIME:
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> A Commission paper describing the results of the Pilot' Simulator Examination program has been provided to the ACRS.
The Committee has agreed to schedule an informa-tion briefing on this matter.
The staff is in the process of preparing another Commission Paper to inform the Commissioners of further developments in this area.
This paper will be submitted to the Commission / Committee during September 1992. Time permitting, this matter will be scheduled for discussion during the October 1992'ACRS meeting.
- 12.
Proposed Reculatory Guide on Maintenance (Open) (JCC/HA)
ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined The NRC staff expects to provide a revised draft of the proposed regulatory guide on maintenance and an associat-
[
ed industry document by the September 1992 ACRS meeting.
This version of the proposed guide, if approved, will be issued for public comment in November 1992.
The EDO has
/
S p requested Committee review during the October 1992 ACRS meeting.
h ybI A meeting of the Maintenance Practices and Procedures O d' Subcommittee has been tentatively scheduled for October i
6, 1992 to discuss this matter.
This item will be scheduled for discussion during the October 1992 meeting.
.j l
- 13. [Reculatory Analysis Guidelines (Open) (DAW /MDH) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined
~j The document (Revision 2 to NUREG/BR-0058, Regulatory Analysis Guidelines for U.S. NRC) describing the staff's i
ptr' 4 proposed approaches to the resolution of major issues associated with regulatory analyses (including safety I
1[
goal implementation) is expected to be provided to the ACRS by early September 1992. Mr. Ward plans to schedule a Subcommittee meeting on this matter.
The EDO has requested Committee review of this matter during the
/
s (October 1992 meeting.
14.
Policy Issues for Evolutionary and Passive Desians (Open)
(CJW/EGI/MME) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determir.cd The EDO has requested the Committee review of the latest set of policy issues identified by the staff for certifi-cation of evolutionary and passive plant designs (" grand-son" of SECY-90-016) during the September 1992 ACRS meeting.
A draft SECY paper' describing these issues has i
been provided to the Committee during the July 1992 ACRS meeting.
A Subcommittee meeting on this matter has been scheduled during the afternoon of September 9, 1992 and time has been scheduled for full Committee discussion during the September 1992 ACRS meeting.
Additional time will be_ scheduled during the October 1992 ACRS meeting, if needed.
b 15.
BWR Stability Issues (Open) (IC/ JEW /PAB) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined Documents related to the NRC staff's work on the resolu-tion of BWR stability issues have been provided to the ACRS.
A joint meeting of the ACRS Subcommittees on Thermal Hydraulic Phenomena and Core Performance has been scheduled for September 17, 1992 to discuss this matter.
This matter will be ready for Committee review during the October 1992 ACRS meeting.
Drs. Catton and Wilkins will recommend a course of action after the September 17, 1992 Subcommittee meeting.
16.
Meeting with the Director of Nuclear Material Safety and Safecuards (Open/ Closed) (DAW /RFF) ESTIMATED TIME: 11/2 hours The EDO has proposed that the Committee meet with Mr.
Bernero durina the October ACRS meeting.
This is consistent w'.th the Committee practice of having periodic meetings with the NRC staff Office Directors to discuss matters of mutual interest.
The Committee has agreed to ask Mr. Bernero for an overview of the status of the HLW storage and Aisposal programs.
+ W-X M Other items for discussioh sho d be identifi d durin
$"4"&**$*",fp**Al"Sf t,e wh 17.
10 CFR Part 55 Rule Changa (Open)
( CC/HA) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined The EDO has requested ACRS review of proposed changes to 10 CFR Part 55 during the October ACRS meeting.
A commission paper describing these proposed rule changes is expected to be provided to the Committee before the
, September ACRS meeting.
The NRC staff is proposing that requalification examinations be conducted by the licensee
~
rather than by the NRC.
The Planning and Procedures Subcommittee and Mr. Carroll, f
Chairman of the Human Factors Subcommittee, need to l
g jfg recommend a course of action to the Committee, s
mj.
II.
POTENTIAL ITEMS FOR THE 391ST.
NOVEMBER 5-7,
- 1992, ACRS MEETING 18.
esian Acceptance Criteria (Open)
(JCC/EGI) ESTIMATED Q
TIME:
To be determined
' J/
The document (SECY-92-299) describing design acceptance criteria (DAC) in the areas of Man / Machine Interface and
[ O ACRS.
Control and Protection Systems has been provided to the Mr. Carroll, Chairman of the Ad Hoc Subcommittee 4
on Design Acceptance Criteria, plans to schedule a meeting to discuss these DACs.
This matter will be scheduled for discussion during the October.1992 ACRS meeting.
19.
Kev Policy Issues for PreaDolication Desions (Open)
(DAW /MME) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined The NRC staff expects to provide the ACRS with a Commis-sion Paper describing policy issues that the NRC staff has identified for the MHTGR, PIUS, PRISM, and CANDU 3 designs in September 1992.
The EDO has requested Committee review during the November 1992 ACRS meeting.
The Planning and Procedures Subcommittee and the Chairman of the Advanced Reactor Designs Subcommittee, will recommend a course of action af ter receiving the relevant.
Commission paper.
20.
DSER for the CE System 80+ Desion (Open/ Closed) (JCC/EGI)
ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined The EDO has requested ACRS review of the NRC staff's DSER for the CE System 80+ design during the November 1992 ACRS meeting.
The staff expects to provide the DSER to the Committee by mid-September 1992.
A meeting of the Advanced Pressurized Water Reactors N #ry1992 Subcommittee has been scheduled for to discuss this matter.
- 21.
Technical Soecifications Improvement Proaram (Open)
(JCC/DC) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined The EDO has offered the Committee a briefing on the status of the NRC staff's Technical Specification improvement program during the November 1992 ACRS meeting.
A staff paper describing the status of this work will be provided to the Committee by late September 1992.
I; 9
The Planning and Procedures Subcommittee and Mr. Carroll, Chairman of the Plant Operations Subcommittee, recommend that the Committee schedule this briefing by the staff and that the appropriate industry groups be asked to participate.
III. POTENTIAL ITEMS FOR FUTURE ACRS MEETINGS
- 22.[ Replacement of Analoa Instrumentation with Diait31 f Instrumentation (Open)
(HWL/CJW/SL/DC) ESTIMATED TIME:
j To be determined E'h e NRC staff has prepared a draft generic letter on the replacement of existing analog instrumentation-in operating plants with digital instrumentation.
This
[
subject was discussed during the December 3-4, 2991 4
meeting of the Subcommittee on Computers in Nuclear Poi er t
Plant Operations.
The NRC staff's proposed generic M
letter has been issued for public comment and is includ ed as Attachment B.
g fhMJ The Planning and Procedures Subcommittee and Dr. Lewis need to recommend a course of action.
y 23.
Proposed Amendment to the Station Blackout Rule Recardina piesel Generators (Open) (CJW/HWL/DC) ESTIMATED TIME: To be determined g
<' O [
The EDO has requested ACRS review of the proposed final amendment to the Station Blackout Rule (10.CFR 50.63) and the essociated Regu1atory Guide 1.9, Revision 3, regard-ing the reliability of diesel generators during the December 1992 ACRS meeting. The proposed final amendment and supporting documents are expected to be provided to the Committee before the November 1992 ACRS meeting.
A joint meeting of the ACRS Subcommittees on Control and Electrical Power Systems and Probabilistic Risk Assess-ment has been tentatively scheduled for December 9, 1992 to discuss this matter.
- 24.
NRC Soonsored Research on Oraanizational Factors (Open)
(JCC/HA) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined y
The EDO has offered the Committee an information briefing konthestatusoftheNRCsponsoredresearchonorganiza-
/
g tional factors during the December 1992 ACRS meeting. An O
. NRC staff paper w111 de provided to the Committee before the November 1992 ACRS meeting.
)]i Mr. Carrokl plans to schedule a subcommittee meeting to discuss ti, matter prior to the ACRS briefing.
IL fu) %,
f-5 L
y
3 I.
~
i 25.
Proposed Resolution of Generic Issue 120 "Online "est-ability of Protection Systems" (Open) (CJW/DC) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined The EDO has requested Committee review of the NRC staff's proposed resolution of Generic Issue 120 "Online Test-ability of Protection Systems" during the December 1992 ACRS meeting.
The proposed resolution and supporting documents will be provided before the November 1992 ACRS meeting.
The Planning and Procedures Subcommittee and Mr. Wylie, Chairman of the Control and Electrical Power Systems Subcommittee, will recommend a course of action at a later time.
26.
ESER for the ABWR desion (Open/ Closed) (CM/MME) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined A proposed plan for the Committee's review of the ABWR design and related matters (DAC,
- ITAAC, etc.)
was approved by the Committee during the August 1992 ACRS f
meeting and has been transmitted to the EDO.
The FSER 4
g ras at that time to be provided to the ACRS before the p
3eptember 1992 ACRS meeting.
The expected delivery of q p this document is now September 23, 1992.
The status of f
Committee's review of the ABWR is scheduled for p) f'pthe g
d discussion with the Commissioners on September 11, 1992.
O 27.
Reactor Operatina Experience (Open)
(PGS/JCC/EGI)
ESTIMATED TIME:
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />'
)
A briefing was scheduled.for the June 1992 ACRS meeting on the results of the'NRC Augmented Inspection Team's (AIT's) investigation of the November 6, 1991 event that occurred at Millstone, Unit 2 involving failure of a moisture separatc,r reheater drain line elbow, but.ia s subsequently deferred.
Based on recent telecon with the staff, it is understood that the licensee does not agree with the AIT fin'.ing that the root cause of this event was due to erosion / corrosion. Consequently, the licensee has initiated a study to determine root cause o f' this event.
9
/h*
The Planning and Procedures Subcommittee has' suggested U
that Dr. Shewmon discuss this matter during a meeting of the Materials and Metallurgy Subcommittee and reconend a course of action to'the full Committee.
Dr. Shewmon will recommend a course of action after the licensee's work has progressed further.
4
r-
- 28.
Proposed Resolution of Generic Issue 23. " Reactor Coolant Puno Seal Failures" (Open) (DAW /PAB) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined j
The NRC staff briefed the ACRS on the status of the i
proposed resolution to GI-23 during the June meeting.'
]
RES is recommending that this issue be resolved _via y
rulemaking.
The Committee has decided to discuss what i
further action it should take when the NRC staff had progressed further in the development of.a proposal.
- 29.
Petition for Rulemakina - Protection Acainst Liahtnina and Electrical Transients for Nuclear Power Plants (Open)
(CJW/DC) ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined:
The NRC has received a Petition for Rulemaking from Mr._
R.
P.
Grill, a fermer employee of the (then) AEC, that' requests that th e. agency amend its regulations to add lightning induced and other electrical transients.to the i
list of phenomena that licensed nuclear power plants must safely accommodate.
Presently, this Petition _is under review by cognizant.NRR/RES representatives.
The schedule for the disposition of this Petition is uncer-Ji tain at this time.
Mr. Wylie has agreed to recommend a course of action lat-ar when the NRC staff has progressed further in its ret j a of this Petition.
_j 30.
Briefina by OGC (Open)
(To be assigned /RFF) ESTIMATED g
TIME:
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> The OGC expects to be able to brief_the Committee on the impact of the. implementatien of the recent Office of Government Ethics government-wide changes to the regula -
tions on the conduct of-government employees during the February 1993 ACRS meeting. Topics that the Committee is interested in discussing can be. identified closer.to the scheduled February 1993 briefing.
31.
Presentation of Mr. Spector. New York Power Ruthority (Open) (DAW /RPS)- ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined l
Mr. Spector, New York-State Power Authority'(NYPA),chas asked for an opportunity to brief.the ACRS regarding the results of the FitzPatrick IPE and the~ relationship;to the recent NRC Diagnostic Evaluation Team review of'this?
plant.
Mr.-Spector would also like to discuss-NYPA's views'on risk-based regulation..He has asked for.three-to four hours of the Committee's time.
Mr. Spector will be able to address the Committee during its-mee@fM F 1992 Not M
i
+-
- + -
mm---m.
m.
meeting.
The Committee decided to discuss a course of action after the discussions with Dr. Murley.during the-September 1992 ACRS meeting.
32.
ProDosed Chances to the SALP Procram (Open)
(JCC/DC)
ESTIMATED TIME:
To be determined N
The NRC staff has described proposed changes to the SALP pg a
j Program in SECY-92-290 (see Attachment C).
The staff n
intends to hold a workshop o;.1 September 29, 1992 and to N1 ask for public comment via a Federal Register Notice.
//0 The staff plans to provide its final recommendation to'-
the Commission by November 30, 1992.
2 The Planning and Procedures Subcommittee needs to recommend a course of action.
IV.
INTERNATIONAL MEETINGS 33.[Second International Ouadrinartite Meetina of Advisorv L Groups The Committee agreed to consider the possibility of h
[S hosting a Wingspread-type meeting to discuss the use of computers in nuclear power plants and management aspects of nuclear plant operations.
A Working Group consisting 3
of Dr. Wilkins (Chairman), Dr. Kerr, Dr. Lewis, and Mr.
Carroll has been formed to develop a proposal for ACRS-consideration.
A Working Group meeting was held on May
[
f:'
[4:
26, 1992 with representatives of the RSK to discuss planning for this meeting. The Committee sent letters to RSK and GPR (France) on June 29, 1992 recommending that I
such a meeting be held.
The Committee will decide on 6
future action after receiving responses from RSK and GPR.J Attachments:
A - pp Memorandum dated September 4, 1992 from J.
- Blaha, EDO,
Subject:
Agenda Items for;the ACRS and the ACNW B - pp Proposed Generic Communication:
NRC Generic'Let-ter:
Analog-to-Digital Replacements Under the.10 CFR 50.59 Rule C - pp SECY-92-290
" Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) Progras I
h MJ% -
~
~k P/+ns&t+wMM = W.Aw f V
(,qw k nn G
.n " %
.n.
. e +l J % m (xcuM A 34v'
A 5EP oa '92 11:46 EDo
/
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c
3
's I
WASHINoToN. D. C. 20s55 -
September 4, 1992
%.../
MEMORANDUM FOR:
R. F. Fraley, Executive Director Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards FROM:
James L. Blaha, Assistant for Operations Office of the Executive Director for Operations
SUBJECT:
PROPOSED AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE ACRS AND THE ACNW.
Enclosed is a listing of proposed agenda items for the ACRS~ for the months of October - December 1992.
Ahu, enclosed is a listing of the proposed ACNW agenda items for October 1992.- February 1993.
If any of these' items are of no or limited interest to the committees, or should be relegated to subcommittees I would appreciate your views.
I understand the next ACRS meeting will be October 8-10, 1992, and the ACNW will meet un OcLuber 21, 1992.
We have enclosed an annotated copy of our Work Items Tracking System-(WITS) for the upcoming three month perind.
In aridition, we have prnvided a projec-tion of office originated Commission papers that may also be of interest to the ACRS/ACNW.
If there are particular items identified out of the field of projected Commission papers that we had not planned to bring to the ACRS/ACNW for formal review or briefing, but that are of Committee (s) interest, we would appreciate receiving timely feedback on such preferences.
. Blaha Aooistant for Operations Office of the Lxecutive Director for Operations Enclosures As stated
/L.
4
OCTOBER y
Iltle/ Issue Purpose Priority Related Documents Y
N Heeting with the Director of Discuss Matters of High (E00)
None Nuclear Material Safety and General Interest Safeguards R;gulatory Analysis Guidelines, Request ACRS High (RES)
Package to be provided as soon f)
R;v. 2 (J. Heltemes)
Rev ew as practicable early in September 1992.
R;gulatory Guide for Maintenance Request ACRS High (RES)
Final draft of industry guidance Rilo (R. Baer)
Rev'cw and draft regulatory guide will be provided in early September 1952.
Part 55 Rule thange (R. Gallo)
SECY 92-100 describing basis of Rev ew rule change provided to ACRS.
Oraft rule proposal to be providec in mid-September BTP on Equipmcnt Qualifications Request ACRS High (NRR)
Branch Technical Position provided for License Renewal (J. Craig)
Rev ew to ACRS Format and Cor tent Guide for Request ACRS Medium (NRR:-
SECY 92-287 provided to ACRS Design Certification (T. Boyce)
Rev ew Clistre of Bin: Stability Issues Information Medium (NRR:-
Draft briefing materials 'have (R. Jones).
Briefing been provided
E"l '
(October continued) gn-
~
,g 7.Ths Onsite Analysis of the Human Information Medium (AE00)
Draft Study Report to be factcrs of Operating Events Briefing provided early September O'
( T. '. N:vak)
~
jj -
Pilgria Emergency Response P1an Information Low (NRR)
NUREG-1238 provided to ACRS
,Q hemonstration (R. Erickson)
Briefing Yank:s Rowe' Reactor' Vessel Information Low (NRR)
Action Plan provided to ACRS Esbrittlement issue, Action-P1an '
Briefing tu. Butler) r-4
=.
~.
E i
NOVEMBER j
~ '
- Titlerssue Puroose Priority Related Documents
?
CE systems' 80t DSER (T. Wambach)
DSER to be provided in mid-September j:
Review 1992 C
11
. Key Palicy Issues for Pre-Request ACRS Medium (NRR)
- Commission paper to be provided
, application Designs (MITGR, PlUS,. Review in September 1992
" PRISM,.CA.N00 3)" (J. Dyer) -
Technical: Spect fications -
Information 1.ow (NRR)
. NUREGs 1430 through 1434 available
. Improventnt Program (C. Grimes)
. Briefing on OTSB bulletin board for downicading. Commission paper to
~
be provided in late September a
L t
..--,u_
n m
S.
w e
4.,c..
e n-ww'r4
<m
- - e[.
e-1-
..<ed++
-~
v
-en
.-ei.-<-
c-s w.i e
illv DECEMBER 2
5:
'ltie/1ssue Purpose Prioritv Related Documents
!beendm<nt to S.ation Blackout Request ACRS High (RES)
Draft final rule and supporting 5
- tule-(10 CrR 5e.63) Regarding Review documentstogeprovidedinearly lissal Generaters~(A. Serkiz)
November 1992 gn
- iBWR F!ER (C. Poslusny} -
Initial FSER to be provided in Review September 1992
Proposed resolution package to be 1
ssue 120, "Online Testability Review to be provided early in November
.f Prclection systems" (R. Baer) 1992.
omprciensive Evaluation of Information Medium (RES)
Staff paper to be provided early rgani;ational Factor Research Briefing in November 1992.
. rogram (F. Co#fman) 4
+
=
l
'. Note tlat a Commission interest has been expressed lfor discussion of the draft final rule r sposal with ACRS at the joint: meeting in December 1992.
f, 2
L-
-. =
N AN c
TitlNIssue Purpose Priority Related Documents g
C October 5
R:gulatory Analysis Guidelines, Request ACNW High (RES)
Package to be provided as soon 3
R;v. 2 (J. Heltenes)
Revies as practicable in early September 1992.
Proposed Regulatory Guide, Part Request ACNW High (RES)
Drafi Regulatory Guide to be 20-ALARA for Materials Licensees Revies provided by mid-September 1992.
(D. Cool)
November
Package to be provided by Assessment Branch Technical Revied Octoter 19, 1992 P;sition (P. Lohaus)
Staff Technica'l Position Request ACNW High (NMSS)
PackEge to be provided by
.on Fault Avoidance (K. McConnell, Review Octoter 19, 1992 R. Ballerd)
~ National Profile on Mixed Waste Information Medium (NMSS) Task reports and SECY paper (N. Oricndo, M. Weber)
Briefing to bc provided by Septcuber 30, 1992
- December
.3 raft lbsearch Plan NUREG-1406 Request ACNW High (RES)
Draft NUREG will be provided in
'(S. Bahadur)
Review Ncvember 1992
- 1rt:fing on.NRC Staff Evaluation Information Medium (NMSS)
Ncne (staff may also be if DOE's Requested Removal of Briefing available for a November
- site Chnracterization Analysis presentation as ACNW agenda
!)bj:ction #1-(R. Weller, permits)
- 1. Ballard)
NN
.a.
.,.. y (ACW Continued)
.7 December (Continued)
J.. -
6flefing on the Results of-Briefing Information Medium-(NMSS)
None C
Geological Cross-Section y.
' Balancing Activities
. (K.. McConnell, R. Ballard)
- m
-y, January Nona.
Febrcary Noze 4
Y l
4 L
l
!~
\\
j:
= -.
REASSIGNMENT OF SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRMAN BUBCOMMITTEE CURRENT CHAIRMAN NEW CHAIRMAN SUBCTE. MEMBERS Advanced Reactor Ward Wilkins Carroll, Catton, Designs Kress, Michelson, Wylie Containment Ward Catton Carroll, Kress, Systems Wylie Decay Heat Removal Ward Catton Michelson, Wylie, Systems Lindblad Planning and Ward Shewmon carroll Procedures Plant License Ward Lindblad Carroll, Kress, Renewal Lewis, Michelson, Shewmon, Wylie Safety Philosophy, Ward Kress Lewis, Michelson, Technology and Wylie Criteria Extreme External Kress Lindblad Kress, Lewis, Phenomena Michelson, Wylie Reliability and Kress Lindblad Carroll, Kress, Quality Michelson, Shewmon, Wylie ATTACHf1E!!T B 1
C jf '
/
C1
/
PROCEDURES FOR PRESENTATIONS TO ACRS SUBCOMMITTEES AND THE FULL COMMITTEE In the interest of optimizing the use of available presentation time at ACRS Subcommittee and the full ACRS Committee meetings, the following guidance is provided to the NRC
- staff, industry organizations, and members of the public in making presentations to the Committee:
1.
The first slide of each presentation should include the name(s),
affiliation (s) and phone number (s) of the presenter (s). provides an example for staff presentations.
Additionally, each slide in a
presentation package should be numbered sequentially for i
ease of reference.
2.
When there are a number of presenters on a subject from a group (e.g.,
IGC staff and its consultants, industry organizations, or public groups) the group's presentation slides should be combined into one package and distributed at the beginning of the presentation.
This will avoid the disruption caused by handing out slide packages during the course of a presentation.
i 3.
Individuals assisting presenters by responding to questions asked by Committee members or consultants should come to a microphone and state their names and i
affiliations before providing their response.
This procedure is necessary so that the reporter can include proper information in the meeting transcript and the Committee members, consultants, and members of the audience are aware of who is responding.
4.
Presentations should be planned to be completed in approximately half of the time allotted by the agenda schedule, with the remaining time reserved for questions ATTACHMENT C h
by ACRS Members and consultants and responses by appropriate personnel.
5.
Presenters should summarize the background history of the issue under consideration by emphasizing only important events.
Chronologies of the regulatory history of the issue should be included in the presentation package for information, but should not be discussed line-by -line unless the Committee and/or its consultants have specific questions on the background of the issue.
6.
Presenters should not read their slides verbatim; rather they should discuss the important points that they wish to emphasize to the Committee.
7.
Presenters should be prepared during the course of their presentation to summarize some of their prepared presentation in the interest of meeting the Committee's time schedule.
8.
Presenters who are unable to answer a member's and/or consultant's question should say so and commit to provide a written response to the questioner (through the cognizant ACRS staff engineer) subsequent to the meeting.
9.
Care should be taken by presenters to keep slides / handouts from being "too busy" and' difficult to distinguish, especially at the back of the room.
Standard size type (10 pitch) should be avoided.
The use of the orator typeface or a reasonable facsimile would be better suited for such presentations.
Additionally, spacing between sentences, (i.e., 1%.to 1%
spaces minimum) should be used to improve readability.
2/
I 10.
(What else should we add?)
i
.f a
f f
h
t.ft LL0b O KE.
NRR STAFF PRESENTATION TO THE ACRS i
~
SUBJECT:
DATE:
PRESENTER:
PRESENTER *S TITLE / BRANCH /DIV:
PRESENTER'S NRC TEL. NO.:
SUBCOMMITTEE:
M
/
f o
UNITED STATES i
t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
.E ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS o
g WASHINGTON, D C. 20555 Forelan Participants in the September 22 International Meetina Computers in Nuclear Power Plant Operations Subcommittee (Status September 8, 1992)
Will Attend?
Confirmed?
ASEA Brown Boveri (Sweden)
Yes Yes Electricit6 de France (France)
Yes Yes Framatome (France)
Yes Yes Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd.
(Canada)
Yes Yes Ontario Hydro (Canada)
Yes No Siemens Power Corp (Germany)
Yes Yes
)
AEA Technology (U.K.)
Yes Yes i
Nuclear Electric (U.K.)
Yes Yes Tokyo Electric Power Co.
(Japan)
Yes Yes
]
Japan Atomic Power Co.
(Japan)
Yes Yes Kansai Electric Power Co.
(Japan)
Undecided Toshiba (Japan)
Maybe*
Hitachi (Japan)
Maybe*
j i
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan)
Yes Yes
[* May attend if requested by TEPCO, but not directly invited
]
by ACRS)
)
1 ATTACHMENT D
/
d Page 2 of 3 Individuals Makina Presentations and/or Attendina
[ Names of Principal Speakers in Capital Letters)
ASEA Brown Boveri Mr. BO SANDIN, I&C Manager, ABB (Sweden)
Mr. Harry Thornburg, ABB C-E Nuclear Power (Windsor, Ct.)
Mr. Chuck Molnar, ABB C-E Nuclear Power (Windsor, Ct.)
Electricits de France Mr. GUY GUESNIER, Control Section Head, Basic Design Department, Engineering & Construction Division, EdF (France)
Mr. HENRI HERKELMANN, Electricity and I&C Section Head, Nuclear Department (N4 Project), Engineering & Construction Division, EdF (France)
Framatome Mr. ALAIN PARRY, I&C Department Manager, Framatome (France)
Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd Mr.
R.A. OLMSTEAD, Control & Instrumentation Manager, AECL-CANDU (Canada)
Mr. Dennis R.
Shiflett, Vice President & General Manager, AECL Technologies (U.S. Liaison Office, Washington, DC)
Ontario Hydro (Speaker TBD)
Mr.
Avro Niitenberg, Vice President-Operations, Ontario Hydro (Toronto, Canada)
Siemens Power Corp.
Mr. KEVIN SULLIVAN, I&C Manager, Siemens Power Corporation (U.S.
Engineering Office, Braidington, Florida)
Mr. Rob MacDougall, Siemens (Washington, DC office)
Page 3 of 3
- *. Technology Dr.
IAN C.
- SMITH, Control & Instrumentation Product ' Manager, Systems Development Division, Winfrith (UK)
Dr. KEITH W.
McMINN, Asst. Control & Instrumentation Manager, Safety Engineering Systems Division, Winfrith (UK)
Mr.
Bill
- Cauley, Mohr Associates, U.S.
Liaison for AEA Technology (Richland, Wa.)
Nuclear Electric Dr. ROY M.
WHITE, Control & Instrumentation Manager, PWR Project Group, Nuclear Electric (UK)
Tokyo Electric Power Company l(TEPCO)
(Speaker TBD)
Mr.
Konosuke
- Sugiura, General
- Manager, U.S.
Liaison Office.
(Washington, DC)
Japan Atomic Power Company (JAPC)
Mr. ICHIMURA, Manager, LWR Development, JAPC.(Japan)
Mr.
Takano Nishimoto, General
- Manager, Japan Electric Power Information Center (Washington, DC)
Kansai Electric Power Company (Attendance undecided; speaker, if any, TBD)
Mr. Kenji Okada, Chief Representative, Kansai (Washington, DC)
Mitsubishi Atomic Power Industries, Inc.
Mr.
MAKOTO TAKASHIMA, Senior Engineer, I&C Engineering Team (Japan)
Mr.
Masataka Miyashita, General
- Manager, Mitsubishi Heavy.
Industries America-(Monroeville, Pa.)
s e
2(o
- #I gk Gg f[p 1%
i UNITED STATES N
f}!
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
\\[Cin ANNOUNCEMENT NO.
28 DATE:
March 26, 1991 i
TO:
All NRC Employees j
REVISED LIST OF STOCKS, BONDS, AND OTHER SECURITY INTERESTS THAT CERTAIN NRC EMPLOYEES ARE PROHIBITED FROM OWNING; 1991 STOCK OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION Revised List of Prohibited Securities Attached is a revised list of entities whose stocks, bonds, and other security interests may not be owned by any NRC employee who occupies a position at or above GG-13 or its equivalent, or by the spouse, minor child, or other members of the immediate household of that employee.
The securities ownership prohibition also applies to employees below GG-13 that hold positions that fall within occupational codes designated by the Commission, and to special government employees who are members of th's. Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, the Advisory Committee on Nuclear Maste, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, or the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel.
Ten companies have been added since the April 16, 1990 list was published.
The newly listed companies are:
Fluor Corp.
Hydro Resources, Inc.
Louisiana Energy services Minerals Exploration Company North Atlantic Energy Service Company Northeast Utilities service company Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SONOPCO)
Umeteo Minerals corporation United Nuclear Urenco, Ltd.
Western Nuclear, Inc.
ATTACHMENT E
Current NRC employees will have until April 14, 1992, to divest themselves of interests in the companies listed above that have been added to the prohibited list.
New employees must divest themselves of the interest within 30 days after entrance on duty.
Employees who wish to defer the tax consequences of any divestiture may seek a Certificate of Divestiture.
For further details, see Announcement No. 65, May 2, 1990.
Six companies have been deleted from the list.
The companies deleted from the list, and whose securities thus may be purchased by NRC employees, are:
1 Appalachian Power Company Burlington Electric Department, VT Iowa Resources, Inc. (Iowa Power & Light Co.)
Sam Rayburn G&T, Inc.
Tex-La Electric Power Cooperative Western Illinois Power Cooperative There is no prohibition on the purchase of security interests in entities not on this list.
Employees are advised, however, that in the event they, or their spouse or minor children, hold securities worth more than $1000 in any entity (whether on this list or not), under 10 C.F.R. 0.735-21 they must recuse themselves from participation in any particular matter affecting that entity.
Appended to the prohibited stock list are a detailed description of NRC positions whose incumbents are covered by the stock ownership prohibitions and a 1991 security ownership certification that those employees must fill out.
Onp pv gC
.J J mes A. Fitzgerald sistant General Counsel
Attachment:
As stated e-
COMPANIES IN WHICH NRC EMPLOYEES COVERED BY 10 C.F.R.0.735-29 ARE PROHIBITED FROM OWNING STOCKS, BONDS OR OTHER SECURITY INTERESTS 1.
Nuclear Utilities Alabama Power Company
- Alachua Electric Department, FL Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.
American Electric Power Co. Inc.
- Anaheim Electrical Division, CA Arkansas Power & Light company
- Atlantic Energy, Inc.
(Atlantic City Electrical Company)
- Austin Electric Department, TX Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Bangor Hydro-Electric Company Boston Edison Company
- Bushnell Utility Dept., FL Cajun Electric Power Cooperative Cambridge Electric Light Company Canal Electric Light Company l
Carolina Power & Light Company
)
Centerior Energy Corp (Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.)
(Toledo Edison Co.)
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.
Central Iowa Power Cooperative Central Maine Power Company Central Power & Light Company Central & South West Corporation Central Vermont Public Service Corp.
- Chicopee Electric Light Dept, MA CMS Energy Corp. (Consumers Power Co.)
- Commonwealth Edison Company i
Commonwealth Electric Company Commonwealth Energy System Connecticut Light & Power Company Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, Inc.
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.
This entity is a municipal or state government organization.
Ownership of bonds or other financial instruments issued by such an organization is proscribed only when the bonds or other financial instruments are issued specifically for the construction of nuclear power plants.
- Note that this is a new name for an entity previously listed."
The former name of this entity is in parentheses.
Consolidated Edison Co. of.New York Corn. Belt Power Cooperative Dairyland: Power. Cooperative.
- Dalton Water 6. Light' Commission, GA Delmarva Power & Light Company Detroit Edison Company.
Dominion Resources (Virginia Electric &
Power Corp.)
4 Duke Power Company.
Duquesne Light Company EAU / Corporation Eastern Utilities-Associates El Paso-Electric Company-
- Entergy1 Corporation (Middle South Utilities, Inc.).
- Entergy Operations, Inc.
- Eugene Water & Electric Board, OR Fitchburg Gas & ElectricLLight Co.
- Florida-Municipal Power. Agency-
- Florida Progress. Corporation i
(Florida Po'wer Corporation)
- FPL Group, Inc.
3 (Florida Power & Light Company)
- Gainesville-Alachua. County Regional Electric, Water, and Sewer Utilities Board,-FL General Public Utilities Corporation Georgia Power Company Green Mountain Power Corporation Gulf States Utilities. Company Houston Industries, Inc.'
(Houston Lighting & PowertDept., MA) 1
- Hudson Light &-Power' Dept., MA 0
IE Industries'(Iowa Electric Light
& Power Co.)-
Illinois Power company Indiana Michigan Power.co.
Interstate Power Company...
Iowa-Illinois Gas.& Electric lCo.
Jersey Central' Power & Light Co.-
4' KansasLCity: Power ~& Light Co.
- Kissince Utilities, FLL
- Leesburg Municipa1.-Electric. Dept., F1.-
Long Island Lighting Company?
- Los, Angeles Department of Water & Powar
. Louisiana Power E. Light'Co.
i
- Lyndonville Electric Dept.,.VT Madison Gas'&= Electric Co.
Maine Public Service' Company Maine Yankee: Atomic Power Co.-
fy
' Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company'
- VL-
.u,
~
a Metropolitan Edison Company Mississippi Power & Light Co.
Montaup Electric Co.
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia Nebraska Public Power District New England Electric System New England Gas & Electric Association New England Power Company New Hampshire Electric Cooperative, Inc.
- New Smyrna' Beach Utilities Commission, FL New York Power Authority New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation North Atlantic Energy Service Company (subsidiary of Northeast Utilities)
- North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation
- North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1
- North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Northeast Utilities Northeast Utilities Service company (subsidiary of Northeast Utilities)
Northern States Power Company
- 0cala Utilities Division, FL Oglethorpe Power Corp.
ohio Edison Company Old Dominion Electric Cooperative Omaha Public Power District
- Orlando Utilities Commission, FL Pacific Gas & Electric Company
- Pacific Power & Light Company (Pacific Corporation)
Pennsylvania Electric Company Pennsylvania Power Company Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Philadelphia Electric Company
- Piedmont Municipal Power Agency Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (AZP Holding Company)
(Arizona Public Service company).
- Portland General Corporation (Portland General Electric Company)
Public Service Company of Colorado Public Service Company of New Hampshire Public Service Company of New Mexico
- Public Service Enterprise Group jyf (Public Service Electric & Gas Company)
Puget Sound Power & Light Company
- Riverside Public Utilities, CA Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District Saluda River Electric Cooperative
- San Antonio Public Service Board, TX San Diego Gas & Electric Company
- Sebring Utilities Commission, FL Scana corp.
(South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.)
Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
South Carolina Public Service Authority South Mississippi Electric Power Association
- SCE Corporation (Southern California Edison Company)
- Southern California Public Power Authority Southern Company i
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Soyland Power Cooperative, Inc.
System Energy Resources, Inc.
- Tallahassee Electric Dept., F1
- Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant, MA Tennessee Valley Authority i
TU Electric (Dallas Power & Light Co)
(Texas Electric Service Company)
(Texas Power & Light Company)
Texas Utilities Electric Company Union Electric Company United Illuminating Company i
Vermont Electric Generation &
Transmission Cooperative, Inc.
t vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS)
Washington Water Power Company Western Massachusetts Electric Co.
- WP&L Holdings (Wisconsin Power and Light Co.)
Wisconsin Energy Corp.
(Wisconsin Electric Power Co.)
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Yankee Atomic Electric Company 2.
Manufacturers / Vendors of Power or Test Reactors ABB Atom, Inc. (Combustion Engineering)
ASEA Brown Boveri (Combustion Engineering) w
General Electric McDermott Corp. (Babcock & Wilcox)
Neal Blue, Inc. (Blue Family Group)
V-
~
(General Atomics Technologies)
Offshore Power Systems Westinghouse 3.
Architectural Encineerina Companies Bechtel Black & Veatch Brown Boveri Burns & Roe C.F. Braun Dravo Corporation (Gibbs & Hill)
Ensearch (Ebasco)
Gilbert Associates / Commonwealth Companies Halliburton (Brown & Root)
Raytheon Corporation (United Engineers
& Constructors)
Sargeant & Lundy Southern Services Co.
Stone & Webster 4.
Fuel Cycle Acolicants and Licensees Allied Signal American Ecology, Inc. (U.S. Ecology)
American Nuclear Corp.
~
Anaconda Minerals Atlas Corp. (Atlas Minerals)
CEGB America, Inc.
COGEMA USA (Pathfinder Mines Corp.)
Combustion Engineering Envirocare of Utah Everest Mineral Corp.
Ferrett Exploration Co., Inc.
Fluor Corp.
Foster Wheeler (FW Applications, Inc.)
General Electric Company Homestake Mining Co.
Hydro Resources, Inc.
Louisiana Energy Services McDermott (Babcock and Wilcox)
Minerals Exploration Company Neal Blue Inc. (Blue Family Group)(General Atomics)(Sequoyah Holding Co.)(Sequoyah Fuels Corp.)
NFS' Services, LTD (Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.)
Nuclear Assurance Corp.
Nuclear Packaging Pacific Sierra Nuclear Associates (Pacific Nuclear Systems) bL7 e
s m.
.k-
]
RIo Algom Corp. (Quivera)
Siemens Capital Corp.
Siemens West Germany (U.S. affiliate of Kraftwerk Union AG, FRG)
Transnuclear, Inc.
Umetco Minerals Corporation UNC Resources United Nuclear Uranerz U.S.A. Inc.
Uranium Resodrces, Inc.
Urenco, Ltd.
Waste Management, Inc. (Chen Nuclear)
Western Nuclear, Inc.
i Westinghouse I
.s
Emolovees covered by Security ownershin Restrictions 1.
All employees classified as GG-13 and above;* and 2.
All employees below GG-13 who are in the following occupational Codes:
Occunational Codes Job cateaorv 000 0098-0 Security 0100 0199-0 Social Sciences, Psychology & Welfare 0300 0399-0 except 302, Administrative and 0303, 0304, 0305, 0305, 0309, Program Management 0312, 0313, 0316, 0318, 0322, 0335, 0344, 0351, 0356, 0382 0400 0499-0 Biological Sciences 0500 0599-0 except 503, Accounting and Budget 0520, 0522, 0530, 0540, 0544, 0561 0600 0699-0 General Health Sciences 0800 0898-0 Engineering and Architecture 0900 0999-0 except 950 Legal and kindred' 1000 1099-0 except 1001, Information 1060, 1084, 1087 1100 1199-0 except 1102, Contract and Procurement 1103, 1106 1222-0 Patent 1300 1399-0 Physical Sciences
- The only special government employees covered by the prohibition are members of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel, the Atomic Safety Licensing Board Panel, and the Advisory Committee on i
Reactor Safeguards.
i 35
.l Occuoational Codes Job Catecorv-
)
1500 1599-0 Mathematics.and-
~
Statistics 1600 1699-0 Equipment,' Facilities, ti and Services 1700 1799-0 Education and Research
~
Program 1800 1899-0
- Investigation 1900 1999-0 Quality' Assurance',
- Inspection-and Grading.
l 2000 2099-0 Supply Group-6 k
7
'l
+
e 2
W
.d-
i a
1991 SECURITY OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION I certify that neither I, my spouse, minor children, nor other members of my immediate household own any stocks, bonds, or other security interests issued by any entities contained on the list of prohibited securities compiled by the Commission.
I, my spouse, minor children, or other members of my immediate household own stocks, bonds, or other security interests that we are prohibited from owning under NRC regulations.
These are:
I understand I am not to work on particular matters affecting these entities until I have sold these security interests.
I will sell any securities listed above that were added to the April 15, 1991 prohibited securities list by the date specified on that list and will notify the Office of the General Counsel in writing when I have done so.
(Notifications should be sent to Lee Cadorette, OWFN, 15B-18.)
(Note:
For any prohibited security other than those newly added to the April 15, 1991 prohibited securities list, please provide an explanation concerning acquisition of the security.)
Name NRC Office (Print Legibly)
Signature Date Please complete the following, as appropriate:
i I am classified at a grade level GG-13 or above.
I am not classified at grade GG-13 or above, but my occupational code is i
Please return the completed form to your Office Director or the individual designated by the Director, who will then forward it to i
OGC, unless you are paid at a rate of GG-16 or above.
Individuals paid at a rate of GG-16 or above are to return this form directly [ '
to Lee Cadorette, OWFN, 15B-18.
.. l