ML20059C093

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-155/93-19 on 931020-1214 & Notice of Violation
ML20059C093
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/22/1993
From: Jorgensen B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Donnelly P
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
Shared Package
ML20059C095 List:
References
NUDOCS 9401040365
Download: ML20059C093 (5)


See also: IR 05000155/1993019

Text

.

.

DEC 2 21993

. /j

0,

pffst

Docket No. 50-155

Consumers Power Company

ATTN:

P.M. Donnelly

Plant Manager

Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant

10269 US 31 North

Charlevoix, MI 49720

Dear Mr. Donnelly:

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs. R. Leemon

and C. Brown, and Ms. C. Gainty of this office from October 20 through

December 14, 1993. The inspection included a review of activities at the Big

Rock Point Nuclear facility authorized by NRC Operating License No. DPR-6. At

the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed with those

members of your staff identified in-the enclosed report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures

and representative records, observations, and interviews with personnel. The

purpose of the inspection was to determine whether activities authorized by

the licensee were conducted safely and in accordance with NRC requirements.

The results of this inspection indicated improvement in critical-job work

,

controls and continued excellent radiation dose and Zebra Mussel control

efforts. However, another example of a previously identified violation

occurred in the area of configuration control. A verbal miscommunication

resulted in the core spray valve motor-operator being tagged out of service at

'

a time when it was required operable.

This event fell within the scope of the

escalated enforcement action which we issued to you on November 9, 1993 and

will therefore not be the subject of a separate Notice of Violation.

Weaknesses were also noted in total activity planning.

In one case the un-

interruptable power source (UPS) battery was initially called out-of-service

when it was not, and in second case work was initiated on the fuel supply line

to the Diesel Fire Pump with no contingency plan in case the supply line was

cut, which it was.

f

Certain of your activities appeared to be in violation of. NRC requirements, as

specified in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). The violation

concerned the failure to evaluate the results of static VOTES (valve operating-

test . system) testing at the final "as-left" torque-switch setting for motor

030163

-

9401040365 931222

-

jk h~ j [

'

,

. DR

ADOCK 0500

5

_

.

._

.

.

_

_

,

.

.

v

!

Consumers Power Company

2

DEC 2 21993

l

l

operator (M0) 7053, conducted on August 4, 1993. Our review of the. safety

.

function of the valve concluded that the violation was of minor safety

!

significance as the opening function of the valve was not impaired by the

.

setting on the closing torque switch.

However, the root cause of this event

,

indicated that efforts need to be improved in the review and quality assurance

of testing and test results for plant equipment.

j

A written response is required and you should follow the instruction specified

7

in the enclosed Notice.

In your response, you should document the specific

i

actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence.

After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed

i

corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC will

determine whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure

i

compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

i

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Room.

The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

!

"

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning th % inspection.

i

SncerelyYbay

Jw u

N

y

B. L. Jorgensen, Acting Chief

!

Reactor Projects Branch 2

4

Enclosures-

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Report

!

No. 50-155/93019(DRP)

j

cc w/ enclosure-

?

David P. Hoffman, Vice President

!

Nuclear Operations

0C/LFDCB

a

Resident Inspector, RIII

i

James R. Padgett, Michigan Public

Service Commission

Michigan Department of

,

Public Health

Big Rock' Point, LPM, NRR

i

SRI, Palisades

RIII

RIII

RIII

RIII

'

'

e

'

D

'

Twigg

Phillip

Jacobsen

.

Jorgensen

b cC' hY

,

,

,

,_--

. _

._._,

.

.-

..

-

.-

-

. .

.

_

..

-

,

!

.

.

.

1

Consumers Power Company

2

DEO 2 21993-

t

!

operator (MO) 7053, conducted on August 4, 1993. Our review of the safety

function of the valve concluded that the violation was of minor safety

-

significance as the opening function of the valve was not impaired by the

>

setting on the closing torque switch.

However, the root cause of this event

i

indicated that efforts need to be improved in the review and quality assurance

of testing and test results for plant equipment.

j

A written response is required and you should follow the instruction specified

in the enclosed Notice.

In your response, you should document the specific

1

actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence.

After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed

corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC will

,

determine whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure-

,

compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed .

<

in the NRC Public Document Room.

The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Acto of 1980, PL 96-511.

,

,

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

l

.

r

incerely

g

hup 42

1

B. L. Jorgensen, Acting Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 2

.

I

Enclosures:

'I.

Notice of Violation

'

2.

Inspection Report

l

No. 50-155/93019(DRP)

.

cc w/ enclosure:

David P. Hoffman, Vice President

i

Nuclear Operations

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspector, RIII

i

James R. Padgett, Michigan Public

Service Commission

Michigan Department of

j

Public Health

i

Big Rock Point, LPM, NRR

!

4' SRI, Palisades

l

RIl

RII.I

RIII

RIII

/

/9

.

gg

Ph

ip

Jacps

Pirok

Jorgensen

f

Rus.

.s.

J N V9}

'

,

-!

i

- .-

- . -

-

. .

. -

.

, , , _.

.

..

.

c# %

UNITED STATES

k

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

g, e

y

M

REGION lu

r

801 WARRENVILLE ROAD

USLE. ILUNOIS 60532-4351

.....

DEC 2 21993

Docket No. 50-155

Consumers Power Company

ATTN:

P.M. Donnelly

Plant Manager

Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant

10269 US 31 North

Charlevoix, MI 49720

Dear Mr. Donnelly:

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs. R. Leemon

and C. Brown, and Ms. C. Gainty of this of fice from October 20 through

December 14, 1993. The inspection included a review of activities at the Big

Rock Point Nuclear facility authorized by NRC Operating License No. DPR-6. At

the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed with those

members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures

and representative records, observations, and interviews with personnel. The

purpose of the inspection was to determine whether activities authorized by

the licensee were conducted safely and in accordance with NRC requirements.

3

The results of this inspection indicated improvement in critical-job work

controls and continued excellent radiation dose and Zebra Mussel control

efforts. However, another example of a previously identified violation

occurred in the area of configuration control.

A verbal miscommunication

resulted in the core spray. valve motor-operator being tagged out of service at

a time when it was required operable. This event fell within the scope of the

escalated enforcement action which we issued to you on November 9,1993 and

will therefore not be the subject of a separate Notice of Violation.

Weaknesses were also noted in total activity planning.

In one case the un-

interruptable power source (UPS) battery was initially called out-of-service

when it was not, and in second case work was initiated on the fuel supply'line

to the Diesel Fire Pump with no contingency plan in case the supply line was

cut, which it was.

Certain of your activities appeared to be in violation of NRC requirements, as

specified in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). The violation

concerned the failure to evaluate the results of static VOTES (valve eperating

test system) testing at the final "as-left" torque-switch setting for motor

I

,

.

. . . .

_

-

_.

_ _ _ .

_

___

_..

,

.

.

'l

!

Consumers Power Company

2

DEC 2 21993

-operator (MO) 7053, conducted on August 4, 1953. Our review of_.the safety

function of the valve concluded that the violation was of minor safety

!

significance as the opening function of the valve was not impaired by the

'

setting on the closing torque switch.

However, the root cause of this event

indicated that efforts need to be improved in the review and quality' assurance

'

of testing and test results for plant equipment.

,

.

A written response is required and you should follow the instruction specified

in the enclosed Notice.

In your response, you should document the specific

actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence.

1

After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed

.!

corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC'will

I

determine whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure.

compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

(

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

.j

in the NRC Public Document Room.

>

The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this-inspection.

!

Sincerely,

!

i

C

G 6M

')

B. L. D- ge sen, Acting Chief

i

Reactor Projects Branch 2

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Report

]

No. 50-155/93019(ORP)

.

cc w/ enclosure:

David P. Hoffman, Vice President

Nuclear Operations

J

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspector,' Rill

James R. Padgett, Michigan Public

Service Commission

~

Michigan Department of

Public Health

Big Rock Point, LPM, NRR

SRI,-Palisades

.

_

.

.

_

_

.

.

-

l