|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20212D0711999-09-14014 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Re GL 88-20, Individual Plant Exam for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities ML20211N0451999-09-0202 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Util Has Performed Appropriate Evaluations of Operational Configurations of safety-related power-operated Gate Valves to Identify Valves at Plant That Are Susceptible to Pressure Locking & Binding ML20210P0441999-08-10010 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Granting Licensee Requests for Relief (ISI-13 - ISI-18) from Requirements of Section XI of 1989 Edition of ASME B&PV Code,For Second 10-year Interval ISI at Plant,Unit 1 ML20210H6531999-07-30030 July 1999 SER Accepting Relief Request to Second Ten Year Inservice Insp Plant for Plant,Unit 1 ML20205Q5561999-04-19019 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Relief for Request from Certain ASME Section Requirements for Containment Insp ML20216H0651998-04-15015 April 1998 SER Approving Licensee Proposed Alternative to Use Code Case N-508-1 for Rotation of Serviced Snubbers & Prvs for Purpose of Testing in Lieu of ASME B&PV Code,Section Xi,Article IWA-7000 Requirements ML20217F3181998-03-24024 March 1998 SER Accepting Relief Request for Approval for Use of Alternate Exam Requirements for Plant Inservice Insp Program ML20217J9981997-10-16016 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Proposed Transaction Will Not Affect Qualifications of Ue as Holder of Plant,Unit 1 License ML20141C9031997-05-13013 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Second 10 Yr Interval ISI Program Plan Requests for Relief ISI-10 & ISI-11 ML20129J3541996-10-31031 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Approving Revised Relief Request Including EN-01,EN-03,EP-02 & FC-01 Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(f)(6)(i) ML20128N8661996-10-11011 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Approving Licensee Request to Use Code Case N-533 as Alternative to Code Requirements,Per 10CFR50.55a(a)(3) ML20129G8941996-10-0303 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Re Second 10-yr Interval Insp Program Plan Revised Request for Relief ISI-07B ML20058L7031993-12-10010 December 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Relaxation of RG 1.97 Environ Qualification Requirements Re Pressurized Water Reactors Accumulator Pressure & Volume Instrumentation ML20057E2641993-09-30030 September 1993 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief Request PO-7,BB-12 & EP-2 in Part,Per 10CFR50.55a ML20056A5611990-08-0606 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Re Util 860108 Submittal of Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis.Nrc Does Not Concur W/ Conclusion Reached as to No Steam Generator Overfill During Design Basis Steam Generator Tube Rupture Accident ML20195J6951988-06-14014 June 1988 Safety Evaluation Approving Rev 10 to Facility Inservice Insp Program & Util Requests for Relief from Certain ASME Code Requirements ML20155J4901988-05-26026 May 1988 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Corrective Actions & Commitments Re Reactor Vessel Head Closure Stud Problems ML20147D9631988-02-25025 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 860404 Evaluation of Environ Qualification of Equipment Considering Superheat Effects of high-energy Line Breaks for Plants,Per IE Info Notice 84-90 ML20149K0501988-02-18018 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Analyses Re Main Steam Line Break Outside Containment W/Superheated Steam Releases ML20234D8261987-12-24024 December 1987 Safety Evaluation Conditionally Accepting Proposed ATWS Mitigation Sys Actuation Circuitry Design Per ATWS Rule (10CFR50.62) ML20236H0071987-10-26026 October 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee First 10-yr Inservice Testing Program Update ML20237H5971987-08-19019 August 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Testing Program & Requests for Relief.Program Acceptable for Implementation ML20214V8911987-06-0404 June 1987 Safety Evaluation on 870528 Request for Emergency Relief from Inservice Testing Requirements Re Four Check Valves on RHR Injection Lines to Hot Leg Connections.Relief Granted ML20206K5171987-04-10010 April 1987 SER Accepting Util 831118,840312,0521,1227 & 870127 Responses to Item 2.2 (Part 1) of Generic Ltr 83-28, Equipment Classification Programs for All Safety-Related Components ML20206K5611987-04-10010 April 1987 SER Accepting Util 831118,840312,0521,1227 & 850517 Responses to Item 2.2 (Part 2) of Generic Ltr 83-28, Vendor Interface (Programs for All Safety-Related Components) ML20212H8111987-03-0404 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 860114 & 0709 Responses to 851104 Request for Addl Info Re Dcrdr Function & Task Analysis & How Function & Analysis Applied to Upgrading Emergency Operating Procedures ML20207C0801986-12-22022 December 1986 SER Accepting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1, Parts 1 & 2 Re Equipment Classification for Reactor Trip Sys (RTS) Components & RTS Vendor Interface,Respectively ML20211P2251986-12-15015 December 1986 Safety Evaluation Re 860121 Response to PTS Rule,Per 10CFR50.61.Matl Properties of Reactor Vessel Beltline Matls, Projected Fluence at Inner Surface of Reactor Vessel for end-of-life of Plant & Calculated Rt PTS Acceptable ML20215E0121986-10-0707 October 1986 SER Re Util 831118 & 860812 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28, Items 3.1.3 & 3.2.3 Re post-maint Testing (Reactor Trip Sys Components,All Other safety-related Components).Responses Acceptable ML20203G6401986-07-24024 July 1986 SER Supporting Util post-trip Review Data & Info Capability, Per Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.2 ML20203H2481986-07-23023 July 1986 SER Denying Proposed Rev to Tech Spec 4.6.1.2, Containment Leakage Surveillance Requirements for Valves Pressurized W/Fluid from Seal Sys ML20207H3711986-07-21021 July 1986 SER Supporting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 Re Part 1 Equipment Classification ML20205F0001985-10-28028 October 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831118,840312,0521 & 1227 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 Re Reactor Trip Sys Reliability ML20134J9251985-08-27027 August 1985 Safety Evaluation Re Dcrdr & Related Function & Task Analysis.Implementation Schedule for Control Room Human Factors Improvements Acceptable ML20133E5121985-07-30030 July 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting RHR Sys Low Temp Overpressure Protection Sys Mods ML20128L1491985-07-0303 July 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.1 & 2,3.2.1 & 2,4.1 & 4.5.1 Re post- Maint Testing & Reactor Trip Sys Reliability 1999-09-02
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217E2691999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1.With ML20212D0711999-09-14014 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Re GL 88-20, Individual Plant Exam for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities ML20212A3361999-09-14014 September 1999 1999 Biennial RERP Exercise, for Callaway Plant. Pages 7,8 & 9 (of 9) in Mini Scenario 1 Section of Incoming Submittal Not Included ML20211N0451999-09-0202 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Util Has Performed Appropriate Evaluations of Operational Configurations of safety-related power-operated Gate Valves to Identify Valves at Plant That Are Susceptible to Pressure Locking & Binding ML20212A0201999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1.With ML20210P0441999-08-10010 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Granting Licensee Requests for Relief (ISI-13 - ISI-18) from Requirements of Section XI of 1989 Edition of ASME B&PV Code,For Second 10-year Interval ISI at Plant,Unit 1 ML20210Q8331999-08-0505 August 1999 Rev 4 to Callaway Cycle 10 Colr ML20210T9481999-08-0303 August 1999 Informs Commission Re Status of Issues Related to Risk Informed Decision Making That Were Raised During Staff Review of License Amend Approving Electrosleeve SG Tube Repair Method for Ue Callaway Plant,Unit 1 ML20216D8791999-07-31031 July 1999 Rev 3 to Callaway Cycle 10 Colr ML20210T4451999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1.With ML20210H6531999-07-30030 July 1999 SER Accepting Relief Request to Second Ten Year Inservice Insp Plant for Plant,Unit 1 ML20209H0881999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1.With ML20195H4831999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1.With ML20206R7111999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Callaway Plant Unit 1.With ML20205Q5561999-04-19019 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Relief for Request from Certain ASME Section Requirements for Containment Insp ML20205S5791999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Callaway Plant Unit 1.With ML20207A7401999-03-30030 March 1999 Draft, Evaluation of Risk of Induced Steam Generator Tube Rupture, for Callaway Plant ML20205G4071999-03-25025 March 1999 Security Event Rept:On 990304,failure to Properly Compensate for Loss of Safeguards Equipment That Could Have Resulted in Undetected Intrusion Into Protected or Vital Area,Was Discovered.Caused by Msk 325 Failure.Replaced Msk 325 ML20204B6741999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1.With ML20199E7011998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Callaway Plant.With ULNRC-03990, 1998 Annual Rept for Ameren Corp/Union Electric Co. with1998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Rept for Ameren Corp/Union Electric Co. with ML20198D9811998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1.With ML20195C8341998-11-10010 November 1998 Rev 20 to Operating QA Manual ML20195C8181998-11-0909 November 1998 Rev 19 marked-up Changes to Operating QA Manual ML20195D6931998-10-31031 October 1998 Non-proprietary Rev 3 to Electrosleeving Qualification for PWR Recirculating SG Tube Repair ML20195D3581998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1.With ML20154L4931998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Callaway Plant Unit 1.With ML20151Y5151998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1.With ML20155B5871998-08-28028 August 1998 Non-proprietary Rev 1 to 51-5001925-01, Risk Assessment for Installation of Electrosleeves at BVPS & Callaway Plant ML20237B8421998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1 ML20155H7381998-06-30030 June 1998 10CFR50.59 Summary Rept for Jan-June 1998. with ML20236Q9991998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1 ML20249C5851998-06-30030 June 1998 Rev 1 to Callaway Cycle 10,COLR ML20248M0501998-06-0808 June 1998 Special Rept 98-02:on 980502,Channel 3 of loose-part Detection Sys Was Declared to Be Inoperable.Caused by Failure of Component Inaccessible at Power.Addl Troubleshooting Will Be Performed ML20249A7681998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1 ML20249B2451998-05-18018 May 1998 Nonproprietary Version of Revised Chapters 4 & 5 to Rev 4 of HI-971769, Licensing Rept for Reracking of Callaway & Wolf Creek Nuclear Plants for Ue & Wcnoc. Chapters 4 & 5 Reflect Editorial Revs ML20248C3681998-05-18018 May 1998 Non-proprietary Version of Rev 4 to HI-971769, Licensing Rept for Reracking of Callaway & Wolf Creek Nuclear Plants ML20247G0811998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Callaway Plant Unit 1 ML20217R2031998-04-27027 April 1998 Cycle 10 Colr ML20216H0651998-04-15015 April 1998 SER Approving Licensee Proposed Alternative to Use Code Case N-508-1 for Rotation of Serviced Snubbers & Prvs for Purpose of Testing in Lieu of ASME B&PV Code,Section Xi,Article IWA-7000 Requirements ML20216K0531998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1 ML20217F3181998-03-24024 March 1998 SER Accepting Relief Request for Approval for Use of Alternate Exam Requirements for Plant Inservice Insp Program ML20216G3551998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Callaway Plant, Unit 1 ML20203M0101998-02-25025 February 1998 Rev 11 to Callaway Cycle 9 Colr ML20203A7951998-02-0909 February 1998 Rev 10 to Callaway Cycle 9 Colr ML20202D4821998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Callaway Plant ML20198S6361998-01-22022 January 1998 Ro:On 980121,determined That Plant Shutdown Would Be Required IAW TS 3.8.1.1,Action D.Caused by 'B' Train EES Charcoal Absorber Being Determined Inoperable.Requested 24 Hour Extension to Allow Restoration of EDG & ESW Train ULNRC-03775, 1997 Annual Rept for Union Electric1997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual Rept for Union Electric ML20198Q0631997-12-31031 December 1997 Rev 9 to Callaway Cycle 9 Colr ML20198J6791997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Callaway Plant,Unit 1 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
.
[p ncyIt UNITED STATES
[ 't j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTOL D.C. 20566-0001
%, ...../ ENCLOSURE SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS ACCUMULATOR PRESSURE AND VOLUME INSTRUMENTATION RELAXATION OF REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97 ENVIRONMENTAL OVALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Section 6.2 of the Generic Letter 82-33 requested licensees to provide a report on their implementation of Regulatory Guide (R.G.) 1.97 (Rev.2), and methods for complying with the Commission's regulations including a supporting technical justification of any proposed alternatives or deviations. A review of the licensees
- submittals was performed by the staff and a safety evaluation (SE) was issued for each plant. These SEs concluded that the licensees either conformed to, or adequately justified deviations from, the guidance of the Regulatory Guide for each post-accident monitoring (PAM) variable except for the variables identified in the SE.
Exceptions were identified for the accumulator level and pressure monitoring.
A large number of the exception requests were for relaxing the equipment qualification (EQ) requirement from Category 2 to Category 3 qualification that allows commercial grade instruments to be used in certain applications.
However, none of the submittals requesting the exceptions provided sufficient justification for granting the exception. These requests were denied to the licensees and applicants whose R.G. 1.97 compliance SEs were issued by the staff before 1987. Since 1987, exceptions for the accumulator instrumentation were considered by the staff as an open item till a generic resolution could be found. Thirty-two plants requested relaxation of EQ requirements from Category 2 to Category 3 for the accumulator level and pressure instrumentation.
2.0 EVALUATION The Code of Federal Regulations 10 CFR 50.49 requires licensees to establish a program for qualifying certain post-accident monitoring equipment for which specific guidance concerning the types of variables to be monitored is provided in revision 2 of R.G. 1.97. This guide identifies the accumulator instrumentation as type D variable that provides information to indicate the operation of individual safety systems and other systems important to safety, to help the operator in selecting appropriate mitigating actions. The guide lists Category 2 qualification for this instrumentation. The Category 2 qualification criteria require the instrumentation to be qualified in accordante with R.G. 1.89 and the methoaology described in NUREG-0588.
Additionally, the instrumentation with Category 2 qualification should be energized from a high-reliability power source, not necessarily standby power.
In contrast to this, the Catego:v 3 qualification criteria require only an 9312170153 931210 PDR ADDCK 05000483 PDR
off-site power source and the instrumentation to be only of high-quality .
commercial grade to withstand the specified service environment (mild environment as defined in 10 CFR 50.49, pn99raph c).
Qualification criteria for instrumentation are established based on the safety function of the system whose variables are being monitored. The selection criteria for R.G. 1.97 variables qualification category is based upon whether monitoring of system parameters is needed during and following an accident and whether subsequent operator actions in the operating procedures are dependent on the information provided by this instrumentation.
The accumulators are pressure vessels filled with borated water and pressurized with nitrogen gas. Being a passive system, it provides a fast acting, high flow rate, cold leg injection during the injection phase of an
- ECCS operation. Both volume and pressure are monitored to assure the accumulator's function in accordance with the FSAR safety analysis. During normal operation, the accumulator is isolated from the reactor coolant system (RCS) by two check valves in series. To prevent inadvertent closing, each accumulator's motor operated isolation valve (MOV) is normally open with its power removed, and the status of the MOV is assured by the Technical Specification surveillance requirements. Should the RCS pressure decrease ,
below accumulator pressure (as during a LOCA), the check valves open and the nitrogen gas pressure will force the borated water into the RCS. Thus, a mechanical operation of the swing-check valves is the only action required to open the injection path from the accumulator to the reactor core. No external power source or initiating signal is needed for the accumulator to perform its safety function. The operator can only control the operation of the motor operated valve which is used to isolate the accumulator from the RCS.
Isolation from the RCS is not a safety function of the accumulator.
Additionally, the accumulator is not designed to perform any post-accident ;
safety function.
The above discussion establishes that the accumulator instrumentation does not perform a safety function during or in a post-accident environment and operator actions to mitigate the effects of an accident do not depend on the information provided by the accumulator instrumentation. Additionally, successful performance of core cooling systems can be inferred from environmentally qualified instrumentation.
3.0 CONCLUSION
i Based on our review, we conclude that the post-accident monitoring of the [
accumulator volume and pressure does not perform a safety function and no ;
operator action is based on the information that will require Category 2 i qualification of the instrumentation. In lieu of Category 2 qualification, Category 3 qualification of this instrumentation is acceptable. '
Principal Contributor: I. Ahmed Date: December 10, 1993