ML20058F045
| ML20058F045 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom, Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 11/24/1993 |
| From: | Stephen Dembek, Rinaldi F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9312070295 | |
| Download: ML20058F045 (24) | |
Text
s y" " %9 i
S UNITED STATES
[
,e [ $
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION "n y j
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555-0001 V ,
?
November 24. 1993 Docket Nos. 50-277/50-278 and 50-352/50-353 LICENSEE:
Philadelphia Electric Company FACILITIES: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3, and Limsrick Generating Station, Units I and 2
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
, COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS SUBMITTAL PLANS FOR PEACH BOTTOM AND LIMERICK On November 3, 1993, a meeting was held in Rockville, Maryland, between the Philadelphia Electric Company (the licensee) and the NRC staff. The licensee requested the meeting to discuss their submittal plans for cost beneficial licensing actions (CBLAs) and to get feedback from the NRC staff. The licensee's presentation pertained to both the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station and the Limerick Generating Station. Enclosure 1 is a copy of the licensee's presentation and handout. is a list of the meeting attendees.
The meeting began with the licensee presenting the intended purpose of the meeting.
The licensee followed this with an overview of its submittal plans.
The licensee's goal is to increase the capacity factor of its plants by reducing the outage work. The licensee intends to utilize both internally generated ideas and external ideas (from both the NRC and industry) to initiate future CBLAs. The staff stated that it believed that the individual utilities need to improve the way they coordinate their CBLA efforts to prevent duplication of efforts.
The licensee presented the staff with a comprehensive listing of the CBLAs it is considering. The list included Technical Specifications, commitments, exemptions to regulations, rulemaking, and other changes. The staff noted that there were many items on the list that were not normally considered CBLAs. The staff explained that CBLAs now receive a relatively high priority for review. The staff further articulated that facilities should identify CBLAs in their submittals.
The licensee committed to explicitly identify any future CBLAs it submits for NRC approval in order to facilitate the staff's tracking of these issues.
The licensee advised the NRC that they were planning to increase the number of licensing actions submitted.
[%khh bk 504-1422 lBA"S88 R 3s668177 f0 1 e
em
,g
'A
)
i
!u !
l 1
Certain items on the list contained estimates of cost savings. The staff questioned the licensee's savings estimates. The licensee stated the estimates were from the industry proponent of the particular CBLA.
1 i
The staff provided general feedback on numerous CBLA efforts (listed in
' ) that are currently in progress. The staff did not provide feedback on the internally generated CBLAs that the licensee will be submitting in the future. The staff stated that it was not prepared to provide this type of feedback at the meeting and recommended that the licensee approach the NRC project manager with a smaller prioritized listing to obtain feedback on these issues.
At the end of the meeting, members of the public in attendance were invited to ask questions. A representative of the State of Pennsylvania was concerned about a proposed rulemaking (listed in Enclosure 1) that would elininate the submittal of the annual 10 CFR 50.59 report. The representative stated that f
he believed there will be li++
public comment on this issue, so the staff needs to ensure they carefu' ct. 'ider the implications of this proposed rulemaking in the absence of c. O al public comment. The staff stated that i
safety will always be the top priority during any rulemaking consideration.
/S/
/S/
Stephen Dembek, Project Manager Frank Rinaldi, Project Manager i
Project Directorate I-2 Project. Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II division of Reactor Projects - 1/II i
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosures.
1.
Licensee's Handout 2.
Meeting Attendees cc w/ enclosures:
See next page i
DISTRIBUTION w/ Enclosure 2 DISTRIBUTION w/ Enclosures 1 and 2 1Murley/FMiraglia LMarsh Docket File JPartlow JMitchell NRC & Local PDRs i
SVarga JDonohew PDI-2 Reading JCalvo ACRS(10)
SDembek LNicholson VMcCree FRinaldi M0'Brien BHughes EWenzinger OGC CAnderson EJordan
/1 0FFICE
}'DI[2'f1AN PDh2/PM,,
PDI92fPl1 PDill-1/db PDI-2/D b NAMEhh thB'rdnb SbebANr'b 4RMb LMarsh LNichol f // 33
// //I93
// //f/93 0/6/93 h /2Y/93 DATE
/
OfflCIAL RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAME:
PBil-3.MTS i
l
t l,
i Certain items on the list contained estimates of cost savings. The staff questioned the licensee's savings estimates. The licensee stated the
.i estimates were from the industry proponen+ of the particular CBLA.
The staff provided general feedback on numerous CBLA efforts (listed in
-l ) that are c arrently in progress. The staff did not provide feedback on the internally generated CBLAs that the licensee will be submitting in the future. The staff stated that it was not prepared to provide this type of feedback at the meeting and recommended that the. licensee l
approach the NRC project manager with a smaller prioritized listing to obtain feedback on these issues, j
At the end of the meeting, members of the public in attendance were invited to ask questions. A representative of the State of Pennsylvania was concerned about a proposed rulemaking (listed in Enclosure 1) that would eliminate the submittal of the annual 10 CFR 50.59 report. The representative stated that he 6 elieved there will be little public comment on this issue, so the staff needs to ensure they carefully consider the implications of this proposed
[
rulemaking in the absence of critical public-comment.
The staff stated that j
safety will always be the top priority during any rulemaking consideration.
f Stephen Dembek, Project Manager M Frank Rinaldi, Project anager o
Project Directorate I-2 Project Directorate I-2 i
Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Division of Reactor Projects - I/II j
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l
f
Enclosures:
1.
Licensee's Handout 2.
Meeting Attendees cc w/ enclosures:
See next page I
r L
I l
L
LwAs--
4+
i ENCLOSURE 1 j
1 i
i PURPOSE OF MEETING i
1 o SHARE SUBMITTAL PLANS FOR COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING i
ACTIONS o RECEIVE CANDID FEEDBACK t
i l
i h
l SUBMITTAL PLANS
\\
1 q
o SUBMIT HIGH PRIORITY CHANGE i
REQUESTS IN NEAR TERM BASED ON:
)
ESTIMATED SAVINGS PERCEIVED NRC ACCEPTANCE i
o MONITOR NRC ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER UTILITIES' REQUESTS o
CONTINUE TO ADD NEW ITEMS TO THE LISTING OF COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS INTERNAL IDEAS EXTERNAL IDEAS, OTHER UTILITIES AND NRC o SUBMIT LOWER PRIORITY CHANGE REQUESTS IN LONG TERM j
I i
1 l
CANDID FEEDBACK 1
q i
o IDENTIFY CHANGES THAT PRESENT'
-l SIGNIFICANT REGULATORY OBSTACLES l
1 4
o STATUS OF SUBMITTED CHANGES
}
I i
t i
2 I
}
i
.i i
i i
I i
)
en -
COMPOSITION OF LISTING 4
}
o MAJOR CATEGORIES e
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS COMMITMENTS EXEMPTIONS TO REGULATIONS
- R ULEMAKING e
OTHER o SUBCATEGORIES i
l CHANGES IDENTIFIED BY OTHER UTILITIES i
L CHANGES IDENTIFIED BY PECo o S1ATUS OF CHANGES FOR LIMERICK (LGS)
AND PEACH BOTTOM (PBAPS)
}
ALREADY APPROVED BY NRC i
SUBMITTED TO NRC j
IN-PROGRESS WITHIN PECo (INCLUDING ADOPTION OF IMPROVED TS)
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORT BURDEN STATVS FOR PECo STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS *
(Submitted to or (Planned or actually Approved by the NRC) in progress within PEco) 1.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS A.
Changes Initiated by Other Utilities 1)
Change Semi-Annual Effluent Release Report PBAPS LGS 7 k/yr to Annual SUBMITTED (Virginia Power) 2)
Basis and frequency of Emergency LGS & PBAPS 0.5M Preparedness, Security, and Fire Protection (ITS)**
(Virginia Power)'
Programs Audits 3)
Increase MSIV allowed leakage and delete LGS & PBAPS 2.5M (or change function of) MSIV Leakage (Entergy)
Control System 4)
Increase surveillance interval for drywell LGS-16M-bypass leakage test to match containment PBAPS-NA (Entergy)
ILRT 5)
Relocate certain Reg. Guide 1.97 accident LGS 3.5M range monitor instrumentation requirements PBAPS-ITS (Entergy) to UFSAR 6)
Relocate loose parts monitoring system LGS 0.4M instruments requirements to UFSAR PBAPS-NA (Entergy)
These figures are from other utilities identified in parenthesis.
o Included as part of the conversion of the current plant Technical Specifications (TS) to the improved TS.
oo November 2, 1993 Page'- I -
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACT!ONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PEco STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS 1.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS A.
Changes Initiated by Other Utilities 7)
Delete PORC review of changes to the LGS & PBAPS Emergency, Security, and Fire Protection (ITS)
-Plans.
I 8)
Allow use of cameras in lieu of fire LGS & PBAPS watches APPROVED 9)
Reduce Secondary containment requirements LGS 0.5M during outages P8APS-NA (Entergy) 10)
Relocate RPS and ESF response time testing LGS to UFSAR PBAPS-ITS 11)
Remove fire protection requirements LGS 0.5M/yr B.
Changes Initiated by PEco 1)
Reduce / improve seismic monitoring PBAPS instruments SUBMITTED LGS a)
Delete seismic monitoring instruments PBAPS-ITS 2)
Reduce EDG overhaul frequency from annual PBAPS to once/18 months APPROVED LGS-NA 3)
Clarify EDG testing requirements and PBAPS eliminate immediate and daily testing APPROVED requirements when an EDG is out of service LGS-NA for preplanned maintenance November 2, 1993 Page..
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN t
STATUS FOR PECo STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS I.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (Cont.)
B)
Changes Initiated by PECo 4)
Eliminate accelerated surveillance test PBAPS requirements for redundant trains when one APPROVED train becomes inoperable for various core LGS-NA and containment cooling systems i
5) increase surveillance test interval (STI)
PBAPS & LGS for main steam safety and relief valves APPROVED 6)
Eliminate schedule for withdrawal of PBAPS LGS material specimens from RPV APPROVED 7)
Decrease snubber visual inspection LGS & PBAPS frequency APPROVED 8)
Clarify definition of surveillance PBAPS frequency APPROVED LGS-NA 9)
Reduce administrative burden by use of LGS & PBAPS Station Qualified Reviewers APPROVED
+
November 2, 1993 Page -....... -..... -
. -. ~,,
.A 9
4I COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CliANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PEco STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS 1.
TECliNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (Cont.)
B.
Changes Initiated by PEco 10)
ARTS /MELLA (Delete flow-biased APRM scram, PBAPS modify RBM trip setpoints)
APPROVED LGS SUBMITTED i
11)
Relocate cycle specific parameters to COLR LGS & PBAPS APPROVED 12)
Reduce LSFT frequency from every 6 months PBAPS to every refueling cycle APPROVED LGS-NA 13)
Power rerate for additional 5%
Increase surveillance test intervals to PBAPS LGS allow 24 month operating cycle APPROVED SUBMITTED 15)
Remove organization charts PBAPS & LGS APPROVED November 2, 1993 Page.
~
~
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PEco STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS I.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (Cont.)
8.
Changes Initiated by PECo 16)
Reduce number of management positions LGS PBAPS requiring Senior Reactor Operator License PARTIALLY SUBMITTED APPROVED 17)
Clarify / Simplify EDG fuel oil analysis PBAPS & LGS criteria 18)
Increase LPRM calibration interval PBAPS LGS-NA 19)
Increase Rod Block, RPS, ECCS, EOC-RPT and LGS PBAPS RCIC surveillance test interval (STI) and APPROVED extend allowed outage time (A0T) a)
Increase PCI Actuation instrument LGS PBAPS STIs and extend A0T SUBMITTED 20)
Eliminate S8GTS automatic deludge testing PBAPS requirement LGS-NA 21)
Increase SRM and IRM surveillance interval LGS & PBAPS 22)
Increase SRV setpoint tolerance LGS & PBAPS 23)
Reduce shift personnel staffing LGS & PBAPS requirements.so that the STA position can SUBMITTED be filled by SSV or shift manager November 2, 1993-Page _
COST BENEFICIA!. LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PECo STATIONS
^
ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS I.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (Cont.)
B.
Changes Initiated by PECo 24)
Revise PORC composition to replace PBAPS & LGS position titles with areas of. expertise 25)
Allow for combination of 3 AC sources in LGS Modes 4 and 5 PBAPS-NA 26)
Eliminate requirement to test EDGs on loss PBAPS of an offsite source or inoperable EDG, LGS-NA unless common mode failure 27)
Extend EDG A0T to 30 days if Conowingo PBAPS line is available LGS-NA 28) 30-day allowed outage time for Emergency LGS Diesel Generator (EDG)
APPROVED PBAPS-NA 29)
EDG overhaul surveillance while in OPCON 1
Relaxation of Refuel Bridge main and LGS auxiliary hoist requirements APPROVED PBAPS-NA 31)
Flexible actions for inoperable Main LGS Control Room toxic gas or radiation PBAPS-NA isolation systems November 2, 1993 Page.
. ~.
~
q COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES TilAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PEco STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED
-IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS I. -TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (Cont.)
8.
Changes Initiated by PEco 32)
Conversion to Improved TS LGS & PBAPS 33)
Receive, store, use Shoreham fuel LGS PBAPS-NA APPROVED i-34)
Reduced containment isolation valves to LGS PBAPS-NA be tested by moving Control Rod Drive APPROVED isolation. boundary 35)
Reduced number of required suppression LGS chamber vacuum breakers APPROVED PBAPS-NA 36)
Clarify _ RHR pump flow surveillance LGS requirements APPROVED PBAPS-NA 3/)
Reduced SLCS surveillance test LGS PBAPS-NA requirements APPROVED 38)
Increase STI and A0T for _ steam leakage LGS detection instruments in main steam line PBAPS-ITS.
tunnel November 2, 1993 Page -
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORV BURDEN STATUS FOR PEco STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS I.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (Cont.)
B.
Changes Initiated by PECo 39)
Delete test of SCRAM discharge volume LGS purge and vent valves at 50% control rod PBAPS-NA density I
40)
Eliminate Main Steam Line Radiation LGS Monitor isolation signal PBAPS 41)
Eliminated APRM operability during OPCON 5 LGS -
PBAPS-NA APPROVED 42)
Reduced test requirements for HCU valves LGS PBAPS-NA APPROVED 43)
Decreased number of snubbers to be LGS PBAPS-NA functionally tested APPROVED 44)
Increased time allowed to complete missed LGS PBAPS 4
surveillances APPROVED (ITS) 45)
Eliminated 3.25 limit on surveillance LGS test interval extension APPROVED PBAPS-NA 46)
Relocated Radiological Effluent TS to 0DCM LGS PBAPS and PCP APPROVED-(ITS)
November 2, 1993 Page ' -
~. _ _.,. _ _ _ _ _ __._-
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PECo STATIONS-ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS I.
TECHNICAL _ SPECIFICATIONS (Cont.)
B.
Changes Initiated by PEco 47)
Allow SLRAM time testing at any reactor LGS pressure PBAPS-ITS 48)
Eliminate OPCON 4 temperature restriction LGS 1
PBAPS-ITS 49)
Reduce frequer.cy of/ eliminate alternate LGS decay heat removal demonstrations PBAPS-NA 50)
Expanded acceptance criteria for testing LGS of molded case circuit breakers APPROVED PBAPS-NA 51)
Decreased fire detector testing frequency LGS APPROVED PBAPS-NA 52)
Increase STI for RPS power supply LGS PBAPS-NA 53)
Allow hot EDG restart after any 2-hr EDG LGS operation PBAPS-ITS 54)
Reduce requirement to drain spray headers
. SUBMITTED LGS PBAPS-NA w
November 2, 1993 Page..
.a.
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PECo STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS I.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (Cont.)
B.
Changes Initiated by PECo 55)
Reduce ECCS piping vent frequency LGS SUBMITTED PBAPS-NA I
56)
Delete leak rate test for certain ECCS LGS PCIVs PBAPS-NA 57)
Delete operability of refuel floor delta P LGS instrument during refueling PBAPS-NA 58)-
Delete SLC system operability during LGS shutdown PBAPS-ITS 59)
Reduce operability requirements in Modes 4 LGS and 5 PBAPS-NA 60)
Reduce ESF HVAC Surveillance test frequency LGS PBAPS-NA 61)
Extend Main Control Room Emergency Fresh LGS Air A0T-to 14 days during bus outages PBAPS-NA i
November 2, 1993 Page.
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REOUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PEco STATIONS, ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS II.
COMMITMENTS A.
Changes Initiated by Other Utilities 1)
Eliminate periodic procedure reviews LGS & PBAPS 142 k/yr APPROVED (Virginia Power) 2)
Eliminate augmented Feedwater Nozzle LGS II.5M examinations PBAPS-NA (Entergy) 3)
Allow roving security patrols in lieu of 14M required postings (Entergy) 4)
Approve alternate design and extended PBAPS schedule for installation of hardened APPROVED wetwell vent LGS-NA 5)
Cable Separation LGS-NA 4.0M PBAPS-NA (Florida Power) 6)
Control Room Design Review Reassessment LGS-NA 11.5M PBAPS-NA (Virginia Power) 4 7)
Reduce / extend Generic Letter 89-10 MOV LGS & PBAPS 0.5M Testing (Virginia Power) 8)
Generic Letter 83-28/ Generic Letter 90-03 (Virginia Power)
" Periodic Contact with Vendor Suppliers" l
9)
Appendix R Fire Pump Test Frequency LGS-NA (Virginia Power) 10)
Jet Pump Hold Down Beam Inspections LGS-NA 4.6M PBAPS-NA (Entergy) l l
November 2, 1993
.Page !
~..
".s
~
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PEco STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS II.
COMMITMENTS (Cont.)
B.
Changes Initiated by PEco 1)
Eliminate Performance Assessment Section LGS & PBAPS APPROVED 2)
Reduce scope and increase interval for QA LGS & PBAPS I
audit of TS compliance APPROVED 3)
Relaxation of IST containment isolation valve LGS & PBAPS leakage test requirements APPROVED 4)
Eliminated IST snubber functional testing that LGS was redundant to TS requirements APPROVED PBAPS-NA 5)
Eliminated as-found LLRT LGS PBAPS APPROVED 6)
Approval of common EOF LGS & PBAPS APPROVED 4
7)
Eliminate requirement for Shift Managers to PBAPS have degrees-APPROVED LGS-NA
,1 8)
Eliminate requirement for full-time NRB LGS & PBAPS Chairman APPROVED 9)
Reduced fire rating of records storage PBAPS.
facility from 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />' APPROVED LGS-NA November 2, 1993.
Page -...... - -
s COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PECo STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS II.
COMMITMENTS (Cont.)
B.
Changes Initiated by PECo 10)
Reduced RWCU weld inspections defined in PBAPS & LGS GL 88-01 APPROVED I
11)
Change commitment to analyze / test RWCU MOVs at LGS PBAPS SRV setpoint pressure SUBMITTED 12)
Reduce number of snubbers at Unit 1 LGS APPROVED 13)
Reduce number of required inspections of the LGS N2H nozzle PBAPS-NA 14)
Use A/C or B/D RHR pumps as redundant pump LGS during surveillance testing APPROVED PBAPS-NA 15)
Reduce security force members manning entrance LGS to PAB APPROVED 16)
Implement common Emergency Plan LGS & PBAPS APPROVED 4
November 2, 1993 Page.-
^
s 4
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PECo STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS III.
EXEMPTIONS TO REGULATIONS A.
Requests Initiated by Other Utilities 1)
Decrease Emergency Plan exercise drill REJECTED 200k/yr frequency from annually Rulemaking Required (Virginia Power)
I 2)
Increase certain containment testing PBAPS LGS 61M intervals required by 10CFR50, Appendix J APPROVED (Entergy) and change to performance based testing.
3)
Eliminate psychological testing for access 1.4M authorization.
(Entergy) 4)
Eliminate requirement to comply with latest 10M ASME code edition (Entergy) 5)
Eliminate fire barriers based on fire LGS & PBAPS loading and/or PRA 6)
Eliminate requirements for the hydrogen 0.25M recombiners (Entergy) 7)
Use of biometrics in place of picture Not CBLA (FP&L) security badges 8)
Eliminate posting containment during periods LGS & PBAPS-NA 1.lM of frequent access to ensure only authorized (TVA) personnel and material enter containment 9)
Eliminate escort of all vehicles within the (TVA) protected area November 2, 1993 Page.
COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS CHANGES THAT REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PECo STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS B.
Requests Initiated by PEco 1)
Delay full participation annual EP exercise
. LGS APPROVED PBAPS-NA I
IV.
RULEMAKING A.
Changes Initiated by Other Utilities 1)
Change annual Emergency Plan exercise drill X
200k/yr to biennial (Virginia Power) 2)
Reduce the scope and delete certain X
IM requirements for the Fitness-for-Duty (NUMARC)
(Entergy)
Program audit 3)
Eliminate the submittal of the annual X
20/yr 10CFR50.59 Report (NUMARC)
(Virginia Power) 4)
Reduce Fitness-for-Duty testing of X
IM contractors from 100% to 50%
(NUMARC)
(Entergy) 5)
Change Fitness-for-Duty requalification X
IM training frequency from annually to (NUMARC)
(Entergy) biennially 6)
Reduce security requirements for vital areas X
10M (NUMARC)
(Entergy) 7)
Decrease audit frequency and eliminate NRC X
60k/yr approval of Plan Changes for Emergency (NRC)
(Virginia Power)
, Preparedness, QA Program, and Security November 2, 1993 Page.
L L W.
CilANGES TO REDUCE REGULATORY BURDEN STATUS FOR PECo STATIONS ESTIMATED COMPLETED IN-PROGRESS SAVINGS V.
OTiiER A.
Changes Initiated by Other Utilities 1)
Incorporate new source term release timing (ENTERGY) into licensing basis i
2)
Reduce certain NRC team inspections LGS Service Water B.
Changes Initiated by PEco 1)
Obtain multi-site licensed LSR0s LGS & PBAPS APPROVED November 2, 1993 Page.
l s-
~
ENCLOSURE 2 LIST OF ATTENDEES i
MEETING BETWEEN NRC AND PEco ON COST BENEFICIAL LICENSING ACTIONS November 3. 1993 NAME ORGANIZATION S. Dembek NRC/NRR F. Rinaldi NRC/NRR L. Marsh NRC/NRR J. Calvo NRC/NRR J. Donohew NRC/NRR B. Hughes NRC/NRR J. Mitchell NRC/0EDO D. Foss PECo/PBAPS J. Phillabaum PEco G. Hunger PECo R. Krich PECo T. Meisenheimer Bechtel K. Hart McGraw-Hill J. Juliano NUS i
S. Maingi PA Bureau of Radiation Protection b
a
.