ML20058C483
| ML20058C483 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1982 |
| From: | Spessard R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058C456 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-454-82-10, NUDOCS 8207260360 | |
| Download: ML20058C483 (3) | |
Text
.
Appendix NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-454 As a result of the inspection conducted on May 1 through June 18, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 47 FR 9987 (March 9, 1982),
the following violation was identified:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants states in part:
"XI Test Control...A test program shall be established to assure that all testing required to demonstrate that structures, systems, and components will perform satisfactorily in service is identified and performed in ac-cordance with written test procedures which incorporate the requirements and acceptance limits contained in applicable design documents."
The Byron FSAR, Chapter 17.0, Quality Assurance, states in part:
"There-fore the CE Topical Report CE-1-A, Revision 7 and all subsequent revisions unless otherwise noted in this chapter, is the basis for the QA Program at Byron /Braidwood Station."
Commonwealth Edison Company Topical Report CE-1-A, Quality Assurance Pro-gram for Nuclear Generating Stations, Revision 20 dated February 17, 1982, Section 11, states in part:
"Preoperational tests which are performed on critical safety Category I equipment are controlled by approved written procedures..."
Byron Station Startup Manual, Revision 8 dated May 3, 1982, Section 3.7 states in part:
" Minor and major changes are incorporated in the test procedures and ensure that only properly marked and updated copies or portions of copies l
are used for testing."
Contrary to the above:
a.
On May 12, 1982, the inspector noted that during the performance of Emergency Diesel 1A testing in accordance with Preoperational Test Procedure 2.22.10 that the procedure copy being utilized by the control board operator did not have a copy of Test Change Re-quest (TCR) #33 and did not have TCR #33 or 34 entered as required by the Byron Station Startup Manual, Revision 8.
b.
On May 14, 1982, the inspector noted that during the performance I
of Safety Injection testing in accordance with Preoperational Test l
Procedure 2.73.10 that the Test Engineer directed the Instrument Mechanics to install electrical jumpers as required by Step 9.3.2 before placing breaker in test as required by TCR #10.
ok 8
Ph
Appendix 2
c.
On May 25, 1982, the inspector noted that during the performance of Emergency Diesel IB testing in accordance with Preoperational Test Procedure 2.22.10 that the procedure copy being utilized by the control board operator did not have TCR #35 entered as required by the Byron Station Startup manual, Revision 8.
d.
On May 25, 1982, the inspector noted that TCR #5 did not indicate if the change affected procedural intent or whether it was a safety related change and TCR #7 did not indicate whether it was a safety related change as required by Byron Station Startup Manual, Revision 8.
e.
On May 25, 1982, the inspector noted when reviewing data sheets for Emergency Diesel 1A testing on April 23, 1982, in accordance with Preoperational Test Procedure 2.22.10 that data sheet 11.10.18 pages 1-4 were not signed and dated as required and page 5 was missing data for the 6:30 a.m.
reading.
f.
On May 25, 1982, the inspector noted when reviewing data sheets for Emergency Diesel IB testing on May 24-25, 1982, that some data had been recorded in pencil and some data had been written over instead of lining out and initialling and recording new data. Additionally, some data sheets for May 24-25, 1982, were not signed and dated as required.
g.
On May 25, 1982, the inspector noted that the diesel operator in Diesel Generator 1B was not attentive to the test in progress as he was observed approximately 15 feet from the control board, sit-ting on a tool box, reading a newspaper and the control board opera-tor was approximately 6 feet from the control board, sitting in a chair in a near prone position.
h.
On May 25, 1982, the inspector reviewed computer data of the kilo-watt output of Emergency Diesel IB obtained during the performance of Preoperational Test 2.22.10 and noted many instances where the control board operators allowed the kilowatt output of the generator to exceed the minimum and maximum output requirements of Section 9.28 of the test procedure.
i.
On June 10, 1982, the inspector noted that during the performance of Chemical and Volume Control Testing in accordance with Preopera-tional Test Procedure 2.18.10 that the control room operator's copy of the procedure did not have TCR's 2 and 12 entered as required and TCR #24 was not properly entered as required.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written state-
Appendix 3
ment or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full com-pliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
'JUL 8 1982
-.,/
[
'CT
,OQ%A<>mk Dated R. L. Spessard, Director Division of Project and Resident Programs i
i i