ML20057E712
| ML20057E712 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 09/23/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20057E709 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-362-93-17, NUDOCS 9310130075 | |
| Download: ML20057E712 (1) | |
Text
__
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Southern California Edison Company Docket No. 50-362 San Onofre Unit 3 License No. NPF-15 During an NRC inspection conducted during the period of August 16-27, 1993, one violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the
" General Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions",10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1992), the violation is listed below:
A.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, states, Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to glity, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviati ins, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are prompuly identified and corrected.
In the case of significant conditbs adverse to quality, the measures shall assure that the cause of the condition is identified and corrective action taken to preclude repetition.
The identification of the significant condition adverse to quality, the cause of the condition and the corrective actions taken shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of management.
I Contrary to the above, indications of improper M0V operation during a March 23, 1992 diagnostic test of auxiliary feedwater control valve 3HV-4705 were not documented nor promptly corrected.
Indications of improper MOV operation in the March 1992 diagnostic test signature showing cyclic thrust loads were not documented and corrected until August 5, 1993.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Southern California Edison Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U. S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the i
time specified in this Notice, the Commission may issue an order or a demand l
for information as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response I
tinie.
Dated at Walnut Creek, California this dday of September,1993.
i 9310130075 930923 PDR ADOCK 05000361 G