ML20057E315
| ML20057E315 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20057E288 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-482-93-21, NUDOCS 9310120017 | |
| Download: ML20057E315 (1) | |
Text
..
APPENDIX B NOTICE OF DEVIATION Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Docket:
50-482 Burlington, Kansas License:
NPF-42 During an HRC inspection conducted on August 9-27, 1993, one deviation of your Updated Safety Analysis Report was identified.
In accordance with the
" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Action,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the deviation is listed below:
Table 17.2-3, Sheet 2, of the Updated Safety Analysis Report commits the licensee to American National Standards Institute N45.2.9-1974,
" Requirements For Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of Quality Assurance Records for Nuclear Power Plants." Section 5.6 of ANSI N45.2.9 requires protection of records from destruction by causes such as fire, flooding, tornadoes, insects, rodents, and from possible deterioration by a combination of extreme variations in temperature and humidity conditions.
Contrary to the above, on August 24, 1993, quality assurance records were being stored in a site warehouse that was not designed to withstand tornadoes and did not have adequate controls for temperature and humidity.
This condition was identified by a licensee QA Audit ccaducted on May 12, 1993, and had existed since September 1992 (482/9321-04).
Please provide to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, in writing within 30 days of the date of this Notice, the reason (s) for the deviation, the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further deviations, and the date when your corrective action will be completed.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Arlington, Texas this 4 @ day of CCtobmul993 I
9310120017 931004 PDR ADOCK 05000482 G
PDR c
TABLE OF CONTENTS d
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
iii DETAILS....................................
1 I
j 1.
INTRODUCTION 2.
WORK REQUEST (WR) REVIEWS.........................
1 2.1 Items Inspected 1
2.2 Findinai 1
2.3 Conclusions 6
3.
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT REQUEST REVIEWS..................
-6 3.1 Items Inspected 6-3.2 Findinas 7
3.3 Conclusions 12 4.
QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) AUDIT EVALUATION..................
13 4.1 Items Insoected 13 4.2 Findinas 13 4.3 Conclusions 14 i
5.
LICENSEE RESPONSE TO OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE INFORMATION..........
14 k
5.1 Items Inspected 14 5.2 Findinas 15-5.3 Conclusions 15 6.
PLANT WALKDOWN OBSERVATIONS........................
16 6.1 Items Inspected 16 6.2 Findinas 16 6.3 Conclusions 18 7.
FOLLOWUP 19 7.1 (Closed) Inspection Followup Item 482/9222-01:
Component Cooling Water (CCW) System Flow Alarms 19 7.2 (Closed) Inspection Followup Item 482/9304-01:
Review of Temporary Modifications 19 8.
ONSITE REVIEW 0F LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS..................
19 r
9.
OVERALL CONCLUSIONS............................
20 i
ATTACHMENT 1 - PERSONS CONTACTED AND EXIT MEETING ATTACHMENT 2 - LIST OF ACRONYMS l
ATTACHMENT 3 - INSPECTION FINDINGS INDEX l
r i
ii V
9
,