ML20057C302
| ML20057C302 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 09/13/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20057C300 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-364-93-19, NUDOCS 9309280194 | |
| Download: ML20057C302 (1) | |
Text
_
3 ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICL OF VIOLATION i
Southern Nuclear Operating Company Docket No.:
50-364 Farley Nuclear Plant License No.: NPF 8 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on July 30 through August 30, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that applicable written procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.33, Revi: ion 2,1978, shall be established, implemented and maintained.
Contrary to the above, on August 5,1993, with Unit 2 at power, a plant i
systems operator and a licensed shift foreman erroneously isolated Component Cooling Water (CCW) to secondary heat exchanger loads on the miscellaneous CCW header during " switch-over" operations from the "A" train CCW header to the "B" train CCW header. Both operators failed to i
correctly read posted CCW valve identification numbers and, in turn, i
failed to properly perform the action steps contained in the written and l
approved CCW system operating procedure.
l This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1).
Pursuant to the provision of 10 CFR 2.201, Southern Nuclear Operating Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to the Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation. (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not l
received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for r
information may be issued to show cause as to why the license should not be I
modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
I THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 13th day of September 1993 9309280194 930913 PDR ADOCK 05000348 i
G PDR 6
-. -