ML20056F287
| ML20056F287 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200001 |
| Issue date: | 08/18/1993 |
| From: | Fox J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Poslusny C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9308260305 | |
| Download: ML20056F287 (16) | |
Text
--
GE Nucicar Energy Gmera!Deanc Com;;any 175 Curtoer Avenue. San J:ne. CA 95125 August 18,1993 Docket No. STN 52-001 ,
1 Chet Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Standardization Project Directorate Associate Directorate for Advanced Reactors and License Renewal Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Subject:
Submittal Supporting Accelerated ABWR Schedule - Changes to Appendix 18E
Dear Chet:
Enclosed is a final SSAR markup of the changes to Appendix 18E. These changes have been reviewed by the staff and will be included in Amendment 32.
Please pro"ide copies of this transmittal to Clare Goodman and Dick Eckenrode.
Sincerely, C d h oyo Jack Fox Advanced Reactor Programs ;
cc: Alan Beard (GE)
Norman Fletcher (DOE)
Keith Gregoire (GE) s JIW245
. ) *" . Pat - ,
- w vvv ( V j t I QB260305930818 M t 4 ADOCK 05200001 PDR d h i
)
[?
23A6100 Rev.1 ABWR stzad:rds:tety An:)ysis Rtport 18E.1.2 The HFE Program and implementation Plans The HFE Design Team will establish the HFE Program and Implementation Plans that prmide overall direction and integration of the HFE-related design implementation and evaluation activities for the specific HSI scope which includes the RSS and MCR areas of operational interface. The HFE Program Plan will identify the individuals who comprise the HFE Design Team and establish the processes through which the HFE >
Design Team will perform its functions. Included in the HFE Program Plan will be a system for documenting human factors issues, that may be identified throughout the implementation of the designs, and the actions taken to resolve those issues. The HFE Design Team will also establish the Implementation Plans for conducting each of the following HFE-related acthities:
(a) System functional requirements analysis (b) Allocation of functions (c) Task analysis n w (d) Human-system interface design (e) Procedure developmenI) >
(3.) 'tR Human factors verification and validation The Implementation Plans will establish methods and criteria, for the conduct of each of these HFE-related activities, which are consistent with accepted HFE practices and principles. (For additional detailed information regarding the scope and content of the HFE Program and Implementation Plans, refer to the acceptance criteria presented in Table 18E-1) 18E.1.3 System Functional Flequirements Analysis Analyses of the system functional requirements will be conducted through application of the methods and criteria established by the HFE Design Team in the System -
Functional Requirements Analpis Implementation Plan.The system functional analysis will determine the performance requirements and constraints of the HSI design and establish the functions which must be accomplished to meet these requirements. Safety functions will be specifically identified along with any ftmetional interrelationship that those safety functions may have with non-safety systems. In addition, critical functions (i.e., functions required to achieve major system performance requirements or functions which, if failed, could degrade system performance or pose a safety hazard to plant personnel or the general public) will be identified. Detailed narrative descriptions will be developed for each of the identified functions.
1SE.2 ABWR Human System Interface Design implementation Process - Amendment 31 I
23A6100 Rev.1 ABWR St:ndzrd S11ety Anzlysis Report 18E.1.6 Human-System Interface Design As established by the HFE Design Team in their development of the HSI Design Implementation Plan, human engineering criteria will be applied along with all other design requirements to select and design the particular equipment for application to the MCR and RSS HSI. The HSI design will implement the information and control requirements that have been developed in the task analysis, including the displays, control and alarms necessary for the execution of those tasks identified in the task analyses as being critical tasks. The equipment design configuration will satisfy the functional and technical design requirements and insure that the HSI is consistent with applicable HFE principles.
18E.1.7 Procedure Development Plant and emergency operating procedures will be developed to support and guide human interactions with plant systems and to control plant-related events and acthities.
Followmg the methods and criteria established by the HFE Design Team in the Plant and Emergency Operating Procedures Development Implementation Plan, the operator actions identified in the task analyses will be used as the basis for specifying the
[
procedures for operation. The procedures developed will address normal, abnormal and emergency plant operations including consideration of plant operations during D periods when plant systems / equipment and operator interface (i.e., main control room) equipment is undergoing test, maintenance or inspectiop-
+
18E.1.8 Human Factors Verification and Validation Following the methods and criteria established by the HFE Design Team in the Human Factors Verification and Validation Plan, the successful incorporation of human factors engineering into the implemented HSI design and the acceptability of the resulting HSI i will be thoroughly es21uated as an integrated system.
O
$@ The evaluations will include consideration of the HSI, the plant and emergency operating technical procedures and the overall work environment (e.g., lighting, ;
ff ventilation, etc.). Individual HSI elements will be evaluated in a static mode to assure y5
-p # ,
that all controls, displays and data processing that were identified in the task analyses 1
[ are amiiable and that they are designed according to accepted HFE principles, practicn, and criteria. In addition, the integration of HSI clements with each other an d
({/
g with personnel will be evaluated and validated through dynamic task performance evaluation using evaluation tools such as a dynamic HSI prototype driven by real-time j gg plant simulation models. The dynamic task performance evaluation will be conducted l g over the full range of operational conditions and plant maintenance activities including: normal plant operation; plant system and equipment failures: HSI j
,y
' ,f 4 - equipment failures; plant transients and postulated plant emergency conditions.
,~ - - . . - .. ~ ... - ~ - ~ -. - ,,
i
23A6100 Rev.1 ABWR Stated SWty An: lysis R:p:rt Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continued)
(c) HS1 design and evaluation scope which applies to the Main Control Room (MCR) and Remote Shutdown System (RSS).
The HSI scope shall address normal, abnormal and emergency plant operations and test and maintenance interfaces that impact the function of the operations personnel. The HSI scope shall also address the development of operating technical procedures for normal, abnormal and emergency plant operations and the identification of personnel training needs applicable to the HSI design. The Tba. establishment of an operator training program which meets the requirements of 10CFR50 isg COL action item (See Subsection 18.8.8). No
-fa $
(d) The HFE Design Team as being responsible for:
';-& .4
't c (i) The development of HFE plans and procedures P#
e.J- (ii) The oversight and review of HFE design, development, test, and Id evaluation activities j (iii) The initiation, recommendation, and provision of solutions h v ,A through designated channels for problems identified in the O s@ implementation of the HFE activities i;$ (iv) Verification ofimplementation of solutions to problems 4; *j (v) Assurance that HFE activities comply to the HFE plans and prccedures
& v74-J, g (vi) Phasing of activities (c) The methods for identification, closure and documentation of human
]v g k avw
-o k' a factors issues.
kd (f) The HSI design configuration control procedures.
(2) The HFE Program Plan shall also establish:
(a) That each HFE issue / concern shall be entered on the HFE Issue Tracking System log when first identdied, and each action taken to
-- eliminate or reduce the issue / concern should be documented. The final resolution of the issue / concern, as accepted by the HFE Design Team, shall be documented along with informadon regarding HFE l Design Team acceptance (e.g., person accepting, date, etc.) the individual responsibilities of the HFE Design Team members when an HFE issue / concern is identified, including definition ofwho should log the item,who is responsible for tracking the resolution efforts, who is responsible for acceptance of a resolution, and who shall enter the necessary closcout data.
18E 10 ABWR Human. System interface Design implementation Process - Amenament 31
23A6100 Rev.1 ABWR Sts:d:rdS:letyArclysis R:p:rt Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continued)
- Use of flat panel and CRT displays
- Use of electronic on-screen controls
- Use ofwide display panels
- Use of prioritized alarm systems
- Automation of process systems
- Operator workstation design integration Those operating experience reviews shall include review of (specific hardwa_re maintenance andTeliabMeports prosided by industry organizations (i.e., EPRI, etc.); review of applicable research in these design areas, as may be _ documented in reports from universitiesh n'ational laboratories? and in proceedings published by HFE professional societies; and review of applicable research and experience reports published by the HSI equipment vendors. Further, the review of operating experience in each of the six above identified areas shall include feedback obtained from actual users. Therefore,if the documents selected for the conduct of the operating experience review for a particular area do not include the results of user feedback, then inteniews with users of at least two applications of that particular technology area shall also be conducted. Finally, the results from all these operating experience review activities shall be entered into the HFE Issue Tracking System to assure that the ABWR implementation reflecu the experience gained by the resolution of design problems in operating plants. 1 (ii) For all subsequent implementations of the ABWR design:
(a) If a previously implemented ABWR HSI design is utilized directly and without change, then no further review of operating experience is required.
(b) If a previously implemented ABWR HSI design is not being utilized directly, then the operating experience of the most recent implementations, up to three, shall be resiewed
~
through the conduct ofoperator inteniews and surveys and 1 the evaluation of Licensing Event Reports and the results of these reviews shall be entered into the HFE Issue Tracking System to assure that previous design problems have been adequately addressed in the ABWR design implementation. ,
l l
l 1
I 18E-12 ABWR Human-System Interface Design implementation Process - Amendmerst 31 i
23A6100 Rev.1 BWR. st::nd:rds:reryA=>ysisa:p:rt
)
i Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continued) ;
(iii) Procedures and documentation requirements regarding HFE ;
issue resolution. -
These procedures shallinclude evaluadon and documentation of '!
proposed solutions, implemented solutions, evaluated residual effects of the implemented solution and the evaluated criticality and likelihood of the implemented resolution of the HFE issue .
manifesting itselfinto unacceptable HSI performance.
(e) Identification and description of the following implementation plans :
to be developed: ;
(i) System Functional Requirements Development l l
(ii) Allocation of Function l
(iii) Task Analysis l
(iv) Human-System Interface Design On((v)__ Plant and Emergency Operating Procedure Development) j (v) $9- Human Factors Verification and Validadon Definition of the phasing of HFE program acthities including: ;
(f)
(i) The plan for completion of HFE tasks which addresses the '
relationships between HFE elements and aethities, the ,
I development of HFE reports and the conduct of HFE reviews (ii) Identification of other plant equipment procurement and construction activities which are related to HFE Design Team activities but outside the scope of the team (e.g.,1&C equipment manufacture) i (g) Definition of HFE documentation requirements and procedures for retention and retrieval (h) Description of the manner in which HFE Program requirements will be ,
communicated to applicable personnel and organizations, including those which may be subcontracted, who are responsible for the performance of work associated with the Main Control Room and ;
Remote Shutdown System design implementation.
1
.i I
e
?
18E.14 ABWR Human System Interisce Design Implementation Process- Amenciment 31
l 23A6100 R1v.1 EBWR Stand:nf Safety An:/ysis R:p:rt Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continued)
(viii) Staffing and communication requirements (i.e., the number of personnel, their technical specialty, and specific skills, the form and content of communications and other personnel interaction required when more than one person is involved)
(ix) The identification of any hazards involved in execution of the task (d) The methods for identification of critical tasks. The identified critical tasks shall include, at the minimum; those operator actions which have :
significant impact on the PRA results, as presented in Section 19D.7 of the SSAR, and; the operator actions to isolate the reactor and inject water for the postulated event scenarios of a common mode failure of the Safety System Logic and Control System and/or the essential Multiplexing System concurrentwith a design basis main steamline, Gud ahr b,M. c# 5bSwn G=lm lims break LOCA.
(e) The methods for establishing information and control requirements ,
(f) The methods for conducting alarm, display, processing, and control requirements analysis (g) The methods through which the application of task analysis results are assembled and documented to provide input to the development of personnel training programs (h) The methods to be used to evaluate the results of the task analysis (VI) HSI Design Implementation Plan (1) (Satisfaction of the requirements presented herein shril result in the creation of an HSI Design Implementation Plan which is in full compliance with the Item 5.a Acceptance Criteria presented in Table 3.I of the Tier 1 Design Certification material for the GE ABWR design). The HSI Design Implementation Plan shall establish:
(a) The methods and' criteria for HSI equipment design and evaluation of HSI human performance, equipment design and associated work place factorgwhich are consistent with accepted HFE practices and principles. Within the context of performing these HSI design evaluations, accepted HFE methods and criteria are presented in the following documents:
(i) AD/A223168, System Engineering Management Guide 1990, q
(Dept. of Defense, Defense Systems Management College, Kockler, F., et al)
(
t \;5cch e.s Ldumiend4en in tha McR %d in N rus wg ABWR Human-System interface Design Implementstron Process - Amendment 31 18E-:3
23A6100 Rev.1 48WR Stzstd:rdSsfety An: lysis Report Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continued)
(xvii) Gilmore, et. al. (l989), Userinterface in process control: A human factors engmeenng handbook. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.
Note that within the set of documents listed above, differences may exist regarding the specific methods and criteria applicable to the conduct of HSI design evaluations. In situations that such differences exist, for a particular issue, all of the methods and cnteria presented within those documents which address that particular issue are considered to be equally appropriate and valid and, therefore, any of those documents may be selected as the basis for defining how that particular issue is addressed in the HSI design evaluations.
(b) That the HSI design shall implement the information and control requirements developed through the task analyses, including the displays, controls and alarms necessary for the execution of those tasks ,
identified in the task analyses as being critical taskg(ks. Q yg (c) The methods for comparing the consistency of the HSI human b, M d.
performance equipment, design and associated workplace factors with that modeled and evaluated in the completed task analysis.
(d) That the HSI design shall not incorporate equipment (i.e., hardware or software function) which has not been specifically evaluated in the task analysis ,
(e) The HSI design criteria and guidance for control room operations during periods of maintenance, test and inspection of control room HSI equipment and of other plant equipmentwhich has control room personnel interface (f) The test and evaluation methods for resohing HFE/HSI design issues.
These test and evaluation methods shall include the criteria to be used in selecting HFE/HSI design and evaluation tools which:
(i) May incorporate the use of static mockups and models for eva'uating access and workspace-related HFE issues (ii) Shall mquire dynamic simulations and HSI prototypes for condu: ting evaluations of the human perfonnance associated with the activities in the critical tasks identified in the task analysis (2) The Human System Interface Design Implementation Plan shall include:
(a) Identification of the specific HFE standards and guidelines documents l which substantiate that the selected HSI Design Evaluation Methods and Criteria are based upon accepted HFE practices and principles.
(b) Definition of standardized HFE design conventions.
ABWR Human. System Interface Design implementation Process - Amendment 31 EE-:5
i 23A6100 Rev.1 ABWR Standard SafetyAnalysis Report Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continued)
(c) Definition that the standard design features, presented in Section 18.4.2 of the Standard Safety Analysis Report (SSAR); the Standard HSI equipment technologies, presented in Section 18.4.3 of the SSAR; and the displays, controls and alarms presented in Tables 18F-1.18F-2 and 18F-3 of the SSAR Appendix 18F, shall be incorporated as requirements on the HSI design, (d) Definition of the design / evaluation tools (e.g., prototypes) which are to be used in the conduct of the HSI design analyses, the specific scope of evaluations for which those tools are to be applied and the rationale for the selection of those specific tools and their associated scope of application _
(VU) Plant and Emergency Operating Procedure DevelojIment Implementation Pl x
\ (1) (Satisfaction of the requi ements pr nted herein shall result i the
\ creation of a Plant and Emerge;xy Operating Procedure D opment N Implementation Plan which 'is'[n Dull 'compliance with th tem 6.a Arceptance Criteria presented in Tabl'eq.1 of the Tie esign Certification N material for the GE ABWR design). The Plant and, mergency Operating s Proced'u're Develo ent Implementation P1 ' all establish:
. 'N N\ (a) Methods d criteria for development /
of the operating technical i I /
's procedtire ich are consistent with acceptedHFE practices and
\ \ ,ancepted HFE me'thods and crderia are presented in the following princ'iples. W thin the context of operating procedure development. I
,6 documents: \ N ,e
{
i , /' (i)\ ANSI-N18.7-1976 7 Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance
,' 'for the Operation Phase of Nuclear Power Plants 71976, (Am.
\
,- Nat'l Stds.p idtit.) j/
(ii) EPRI NPg 3659. Human Factors-Cuide forNuclear Power Plant ControIR'oom Developrnent,1984. Electric Power Research i 8 Institute
/
N%
N
\
~
(iii) 'IEC 964, Design'for Control Rooms of Nuclear Power Plants, e 1989, (Bureau Cen' tral de la' Commission Electrotechnique
/ Internationale)
I
,'(iv) MIIeH-46855B, H,uman Engineering Requirements for Military Systems. Equipment and Facilities,1979, (Dept. of Defense)
(v) NUREG4899, Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergdncy Operating Procedures,1982, (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission)
ISDX ABWR Human-System Interface Design implementstron Process - Amendment 31 4
- 23A6100 Rsv.1 snandard setery Analysis neport ABWR c
i i
Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continuea) 'l (vi) NUREG-1358, Lessons Lear from the SpecialInspection perating Procedures, (1989) and i Program for Emergen NUREG-1358 Sup ment I (1992). (US Nuclear Reg torv l Commission) '
s (di) NUREG/Cp228, Techniques for Preparing FJ wchart Format
\ Emergent,f Operating Procedures (Vols. I 2),1989, (US ,
i
\s Nuclear # Regulatory Commission)
,e l
s (viii) A)'SI HFS-100, American Natio'nal S ndard for Human Factors Engineering ofVisualDisplayTe ' malWorkstations,1988,(Am, l l
Nat'l. Standards Institute) \
gineering Design Criteria for l p/(ix) gill-STD-1472D, Human
,- Military Systems, Equip ent and Facilities,1989, (Dept. of !
s ,f Defe'nse) '. l s
/~
(x) Gilmore qt. al. (ly9), Usencomputerinterface in,Mocess control:. [ ;
,/ humanfactors engmeen'ng handbook. San Diego, C s Academ* -
/ Press, Inc.
p Note that withi the sethf documents listed above, diffe nces may ;
' exist regardin the specificuethods and criteria app ' able to the divelopme,nt of operating technical procedures. ituations I that such 'i differences exist, for a particular issue, all of methods and criteria '7 ress that particularissue i presendd within those document'which s are sdnsidered to be equally appropri d valid and, therefore, any ;
ose documents may be selected as he basis for defining how that !
o '
articular issuhis addressed in the perating, technical procedure f development. \ \
(b) That the operatmg t'echnical procedures to be developed shall address normal (i.e., startup, shutddwn, power operations a'nd refueling ~ ,
modes), abnormal, and l i i l ding alarm response procedures an,rmergency d consideration of plant operatibns p ant operat during ons nc u ,
[ _
periods when plan stems / equipment arvi operator interface (i.e.,
4 main control rc,om) equipment is undergoing. test, maintenance or
- inspection. [ ,
/ /
(c) That operator actions identified in the task analysis shall be used as the basis for specifying the procedures for operations.
J 18E;27 ABWR Human-System interface Design implementation Process - Amendment 31 T , y ,- - , , .-- , . - - --- ,- , ,- rm >--
I i
- 23A6100 nsv.1 ABWR studardsafetyAnlysis Report i G
?
Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continued) !
l (d) That a Writer's Guide 21(all be developed which establishes the projess for developing th technical procedures for normal plant andpsdtem p
operation, apormal plant operations, emergency plant op ations and for jr sponding to plant alarm conditions. The Writer' Guide shall contairf objective criteria which will require that the operations tecdiical procedures developed are consistent in organization, style, content and usage of terms.
(2) ie Plant and Emergency Operating Procedure evelopment i
/ Implementation Plan shallinclude:
/ (a) 'Iddntification x !
/ of the task analyses' d nition of required human .!'
/ actior'is as the data source to be u 'd as the basis for procedure 5
/
/ developr'nent.
\ ' j (b) Requirements for the development and use of a Technical Procedure' ;
/ '
i Writer's Guide.\
\ !
(c) Definition of the methods through which specific operator skills and .
training needs,ps'may'be considered necessary for reliable [xecution f of the procedtires, will be identified and documented art of the i
/
technical ocedures development activities.
(d) Requirement that the documented technical procedures developed x
4
'\ shall' include:
i) Title of the procedure ;
i
/ (ii) Statement of the procedure's go and applicability
/ (iii) Identification of reference maredal necessary to support ,
execution of the procedur i
(iv) Identification of prereq itc conditions which must be satisfi prior to execution of e procedure (v) Identification of pre / cautions (i.e., warnings, cautions d notes) that must be co dered in the execution of the procedure l (vi) Identificatiorvor operational limits ,
(vii) Definition the specific human actions steps required (viii) Identifi on of the specific criteria that t[e operator may use to l judge'that the goals of the procedure have been achieved j j i f ,
I l
l 1
18E 28 ABWR Human System interface Despn Implementstron Process - Amenctmex21 )
I
- 23A6100 Rsv.1
- stemtentsarery Antysis aeron ABWR ;
i Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continued)
A'm) Human Factors Verification and Validation Implementation Plan hhj (1) (Satisfaction of the requirements presented herein shall result in the .j creation of a Human Factors Verificatiw, and Validation Implementation !
Plan which is in full compliance with the Item 7.a Acceptance Criteria g presented in Table 3.1 of the Tier 1 Design Certification material for the GE :
ABWR design). The Human Factors Verification and Validation (V&V) l 1
Implementation Plan shall establish:
j (a) Human factors V&V methods and criteria which are consistent with accepted HFE practices and principles. Within the context of performing human factors V&V, accepted HFE methods and criteria are presented in the following documents: [
(i) AD/A223168, System Engineering Management Guide 1990, l (Dept. of Defense, Defense Systems Management College, Kockler, F., et al)
(ii) DOD-HDBK-763, Human Engineering Procedures Guide, Chapters 5-7 and Appendices A and B,1991, (Dept. of Defense)
(iii) DOD 5000.2, Defense Acquisition Management Policies and f Procedures,1991, (Dept. of Defense)
(iv) EPRI NP-3701, Computer-Generated Display System Guidelines, ,
1984, (Electric Power Research Institute) ;
(v) IEC %4, Design for Control Rooms of Nuclear Power Plants, i
1989, (Bureau Central de la Commis:, ion Electrotechnique Internationale) ;
(vi) IEEE-8451988, IEEE Guide to Evaluation of Man-Machine ,
Performance in Nuclear Power Generating Station Control ,
Rooms and Other Peripheries,1988 (IEEE) i (vii) MIIeH-46855B, Human Engineering Requirements for Military Systems, Equipment and Facilities,1979, (Dept. of Defense) ,
(viii) DOD-HDBKJ61 A, Human Engineering Guidelines for -
Management Information Systems,1990, (Dept. of Defense) l (ix) NUREG4700, Guidelines for Control Room Design Reviews, 1981, (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission)
(x) NUREG4899, Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergency Operating Procedures.1982, (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission) ;
(xi) TOP 1-2-610, Test Operating Procedure Part 1,1990, (Dept. of.
Defense) 1 18E.29 ABWR Human System Interisce Desyn implementation Process- Amendment 31 I
, 23A6100 Rev.1 standard setery Analysis Report ABWR i l
l Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continued)
(d) The integration of HSI equipment with each other, with the opcranng ~
personnel and with the plant and emergency operating technical l
(
procedures shall be evaluated through the conduct of dynamic task performance testing. The dynamic task performance testing and evaluations shall be performed over the full scope of the integrated HSI design using dynamic HSI prototypes (i.e., prototypical HSI equipment j which is dynamically-driven using real time plant simulation computer 7 models). In the event that the particular HSI design implementation under consideration is referenced to a previous HSI design for which dynamic task performance test and evaluation results are available, those existing results, along with the results oflimited scope dynamic i
task performance tests which address the areas of difference between the two subject HSI designs, may be used to satisfy this requirement.
The methods for defining the scope and application of the dynamic HSI prototype, past test results and other evaluation tools shall be '
documented in the implementation plan. The dynamic task performance tests and evaluations shall have as their objectives:
(i) Confirmation that the identified critical functions can be l
achieved using integrated HSI design ;
(ii) Confirmation that the HSI design and configuration can be j operated using the established main control room stafling levels (iii) Confirmation that the plant and emergency operating F '
[ technica procedures of the scope as defined inWdi 'JII.1.b e '
~T"%)rovide direction for completing the identified tasks associated with nonnal, abnormal and emergency operations (iv) Confirmation that the time dependent and interactive (e.g., l
& ci m 13 5 display format selection) aspects of the HSI equipment performance allow for task accomplishment (v) Confirmation that the allocation of functions are sufficient to enable task accomplishment
- (vi) Confirmation that the integrated HSI design implementation is consistent with accepted HFE practices and principles (e) That dynamic task perfonnance test evaluations shall be conducted over the range of operational conditions and upsets, including:
(i) Normal plant operations, such as plant startup, shutdown, full power operations, and plant maintenance activides ,
(ii) Plant system and equipment failures (including instrumentation failures) f 18E-31 ABWR Human. System Interfsco Design implementation Proceen - Amendment 31 1
I
23A6100 Rev.1 ABWR stand:rds:terv:.=tysis a:pais Table 18E-1 Human Factors Engineering Design Team and Plans (Continued)
(iii) HSI equipment failures (iv) Plant transients (v) Postulated plant accidents conditions, M dd*id m f(wgr4 V. Q. 4 (O The HFE performance measures to be used as the basis for evaluating the dynamic task performance test resuhs. These performance measures shall include:
(i) Operating crew priman task performance characteristics, such as task times and procedure compliance (ii) Operating crew errors and error rates (iii) Operating crew situation awareness (iv) Operating crew workload (v) Operating crew communications and coordination (vi) Anthropometry evaluations (vii) HSI equipment performance measures (g) The methods to confirm that HFE issues identified and documented in the Human Factors Issue Tracking System have been resolved in the integrated HSI design.
(h) The methods and criteria to be used to confirm that critical human actions, as defined by the task analysis, have been addressed in the integrated HSI design.
(i) Tne methods and criteria to be used to evaluate the adequacy of the operating technical procedures.
(2) The Human Factors Verification and Validation Implementation Plan shall include:
(a) Definition of test objectives (b) Definition of test methods and procedures ic) Identification of the panicipants in the dynamic task performance testing, which shall include licensed operators as test subjects (d) Definition of dynamic task performance test conditions which shall include:
(i) Plant startup operations (ii) Plant power operations ,
(iii) Plant shutdown operations (iv) Plant refueling and maintenance operations iBE 32 ASWR Human-System interface Design implementstron Process - Amendirent 31
- 23As100 Rsv.1
- stendentsetery Anotysis neport ABWR S, f ro :
I Table 18E-3 Human System Interface Desigr(endAooedures Ene!aemenb i
(I) HSI Design Analyses (1) (Satisfaction of the requirements presented herein shall result in the conduct of HSI design analyses which are in full compliance with the Item 5.b Acceptance Criteria presented in Table 3.1 of the Tier 1 Design :
Certification material for the GE ABWR design). The Human System Interface (HSI) design implementation and analyses shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Human Factors Engineering j Program Plan and the HSI Design Implementation Plan.
(2) The results of the HSI design analyses shall be documented in a report that includes the following: ,
(a) Objectives of the HSI design analyses ;
(b) Description of the methods employed in the conduct of the HSI design analyses (c) Identification of deviations from the IISI Design Implementation Plan t
(d) Presentation and discussion of the results of the HSI design analyses, including discussion of design change recommendations derived from these analyses and/or negative implications that the current design may have on safe plant operations (e) Conclusions regarding the conduct of the analyses and the analysis results (3) The results of the HFE Design Team's evaluation of the conduct and results of the HSI design analyses shall be documented in a report that includes the following:
j (a) The methods and procedures used by the HFE Design Team in their review of the HSI design analyses I
(b) The HFE Design Team's evaluation of the completed HSI design analyses, including an evaluation of the compliance with the HSI ;
Design Implementation Plan and HFE Program Plan
- (c) Presentation and discussion of the HFE Design Team's review findings I
)
18E-45 ,
ABWR Human Symm interface Deergn implementetton Process - Amendment 31
4
- 23A6100 Rsv.1 ABWR studentsarery Antysis neport ;
f' y
fb (%
Table 18E-3 Human System Interface Design @nd Frycedupe Developmentj
'(II) Plant and Emergency Operating Procedugopment
\ (1) (Satisfaction of the requiremInts presented herein snall result in the l x development of plant op6 rations technical procedures which are in full
\ compliance with the j it'em 6.b Acceptance Criteria presente,d i$ Table 3.6 of f
'the Tier 1 Design Certification material for the GE AByR design). The j developmentpf the plant operadons technical procedures shall be l conducted,in accordance with the requiremen f the Human Factors' :
Engineerihg Program Plan and the Plan 'mergency Operadng l
Proced'ure Deve opment Implementan an i
\(2) The results of the' technical procedure development activities shall be documented in a report that in s the following: .j Objectives of thebethnical procedure development / -
', (a)
(b)N NDescription of Y the methods employednt in \
the developme/
of the
[/ technical procedtires f j
(c) Identification of any deviadon,s from the Plant;and Emergency
.\ Operatin Procedure Develop tImpi m4ntadon Plan s ,
(d) Presentatior; and discussion of the r suits, including a list of the procedures developed, discussion o epresentative sample of procedures, a[id s a discussion of[ sign change recommendations l
~
derived during the course of, technical proqure development and/or l negative implications that the current designs ay have on safe plant ;
operations (e) Conclusions regarding the conduct of the proce ures'ilevelopment
[
and regarding'the resulta21t procedures The results of the H'FE Designam
\ s Te\ 's evaluation ofe conduct and results i
j (3) of the technical [rocedures develop' ment shall ' documented in a report !
that includes,the following: 'N x ..
l
, \ ' j (a) The methods and procedures used the HFE Design Team m'their j review of the operating technical ocedures developmen ;
- \ \
(b) The HFE Design Team's evalu;rtion of the completed te nical i procedures development,incIuding an e' valuation of tde compliance with the Plant and Emerge,ncy Operadng Procedure Development i
Implementation Plan and HFE Program Plan (c) Presentation and discussion of the HFE Design Team's review findings.
18E-46 ABWR Human.Sp1 stem interface Desogn implementerion Process - Amendment 31
,