ML20055B046
| ML20055B046 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/24/1982 |
| From: | Conway J, Oller R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055B041 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900342 NUDOCS 8207200295 | |
| Download: ML20055B046 (13) | |
Text
.
ORGANf2ATION:
LAKESIDE BRIDGE AND STEEL COMPANY MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN 5'DORI INSPECTION INSPECTION a0.:
99900342/82-01 DATE(S) 5/3-7/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 26 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Lakeside Bridge and Steel Company ATTN:
Mr. W. E. Jonas Director, Quality Assurance 5300 North 33rd Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53207 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
Mr. W. E. Jonas, Director, Quality Assurance TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(414) 462-5900 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Containment system components and component supports.
NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: This company's nuclear production output was 36%
during 1981.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
['23~/2 R. E. Oller, Reactive & Component Program Section Date (R& CPS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
2k8L APPROVED BY:
t arnes, Chief, CP5 Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B and 10 CFR Part 21.
B.
SCOPE:
Status of previous inspection findings; manufacturing process control; internal audits; nonconformances and corrective action; and 10 CFR Part 21.
l PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Docket No. 50-410.
DESIGNATED ORIGINAL 8207200295 820630 Certified By 110AllL-PDR GA999 Et1VLAKE 99900342 PDR
ORGANIZATION:
LAKES!DE BRIDGE AND STEEL COMPANY MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900342/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 4 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and the vendor's QA Manual, Revision 6, paragraph 7.2.1.1, the applicable revision level for procedure No. 4.1.2, was not entered on eight Manufacturing Process Sheets for Contract No. C-9233 at the completed straightening operation.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Unresolved Item B.4.c (80-02):
Failure by Lakeside Bridge and Steel Company (LBS) to obtain a documented cause for a subcontractor's failure to identify rejectable indications during shop ultrasonic examination, as required by the ASME Code.
The inspector verified that LBS had issued a ccrrective action request (no. 64) to the Chicago Bridge and Iron Company (CB&I) which was responsible for the ultrasonic testing.
CB&I's response letter indicated that the cause of their failure to identify the indication was due to the use of a single 45 angle ultrasonic transducer examination method, which did not detect the indication due to the weld joint geometry.
For future work with similar weld joints, CB&I indicated they will use both the 45 and the 60 angle transducer.
2.
(Closed) Unresolved Item C.3.b (80-02):
Failure by LBS to enter the correct Welding Procedure No. 49-B-U3b on the manufacturing process sheet controlling weld repairs of welds in a steam generator lateral l
support for Contract No. 91-82.
The inspector verified that LBS had performed a complete review and upgrading of documentation on Contract No. 91-82 as requested by their customer.
This upgrading would include correction of errors similar to the above item.
ORGAN 1ZAT10N:
LAKESTDE BRIDGE AND STEEL COMPANY MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.-
99900342/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 4 E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
1.
Manufacturing Process Control:
The inspector reviewed three sections of the vendor's QA Manual, Revision 6, which were applicable to support steel fabrication control, welding, heat treatment, and special processes.
Observations were made of identification markings of plates, parts and assemblies, torch cutting and heat treating facilities, weld material storage and issuance control; final painting of assemblies, and various stages of inprocess work.
To verify that steel fabrication, inspection, and tests were controlled and documented in accordance with the NRC, ASME Code, and QA program requirements, a review was made of Contract No. 9233 documentation consisting of: nine process and inspection procedures; two welding procedure specifications and their supporting procedure qualification records; nine fabrication manufacturing process sheet (MPS) travelers; three MPS's including the welding and magnetic particle inspection records; four MPS's controlling steel plate cutouts; qualification records for painting and paint inspection personnel; four MPS repair records; a record of coating application; five multiprocess MPS's; an MPS covering heat treatment; a material receipt and identifica-tion Log; an identification of material list used by purchasing; qualification and certification records for three NDE technicians; weld wire identification and weld material issue records; ASME Code Section IX welder qualification records and weld process usage records for three welders; and the Stone and Webster procurement specification for LBS Contract No. C-9233, Nine Mile Point, Unit 2.
Within this area, one nonconformance was identified (see paragraph B).
2.
Internal Audits:
The inspector reviewed Section 15, " Audits," of the vendor's QA Manual.
To verify that planned periodic audits of all aspects of the QA program are performed in accordance with written procedures or check-lists by qualified personnel, the results are documented and reviewed by management, and follosup action is taken where indicated.
A review was made of:
two procedures covering auditor training and certification, and performance of internal audits; an audit schedule for 1981; five checklist records of audits and reaudits of all the
ORGAN 12ATION:
LAKESIDE BRIDGE AND STEEL COMPANY MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900342/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 4 QA Manual areas performed in 1981 and 1982; a report of the Vice President's annual audit of the QA Director's activities; current records of qualification; and certification for nine audit personnel.
Within this area, no nonconformances or unresolved items were identified with respect to the requirements of the NRC, ASME Code, or the QA program.
3.
Nonconformances and Corrective Action:
The inspector reviewed Section 7, "Nonconformance and Corrective Action," of the vendor's QA Manual.
To verify that nonconforming items are reviewed and accepted, rejected, repaired, or reworked, and that conditions adverse to quality, including the cause, are promptly identified and corrected, a review was made of:
2 procedures; a nonconformance log; 10 nonconformance reports common to inprocess nonconformances for Contract No. C-9233; a corrective action log; 10 corrective action requests, and 3 corrective action summary reports.
Within this area, no nonconformance or unresolved items were identified with respect to the requirements of the NRC, ASME Code, or QA program.
4.
10 CFR Part 21:
The inspector reviewed LBS Procedure No. 1.29,
" Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance to NRC per 10 CFR Part 21,"
to verify that adequately documented measures are available to meet the reporting requirements of 10 CFR Part 21.
Observation was made of the posted LBS notice to employees regarding reporting of defects per 10 CFR Part 21.
Within this area, no violations were identified.
t i
l l
{
i l
^ i'. -
GEei Docket tio. WR 3v?
f '
Inspector Report 180. y.c-r i S ope /M$dule.5/a/vs c[ fim'iegf Page / of 9 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED 71 < /w en cn Ford;iy.5 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
/
ib?> Giwche Acln,s,1;= ew.s T ne, 6e,,,,/(A bu e Hei d.; r-si:,/.7.;i &. iysec,s,- /e 84 r,c,,,, > m fc- &e,eso$ m/ 7/li, t 7
$Y tPc,,er i Ji" "
o '?- Ec A 'A -
N 1, e
/ /i
.?
7
/ 4'5~ 4s &i 7c fc'f 4 fa r c rf G. e f I:/5 cr s ra h = c i i c l/ '!r i
c d ru.n,?f e o ci.,/rc
& c
,fm c?
A<~ FA F2 a- / ca
f 2
7 pr ce cfI
,.,e Ac s - <> r le r
'c A Ps c7c GiUz 40 c -o c, as-c i
G < s, l v,,,-,i?J,7 /,, o n, ec n -/n-c f 6,. w dri I stro
</, e i
4 i
Document Types:
Columns:
i 1.
Drawing 5.
Purchase 0rder 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) l
(
l
Inspector
- / 6#o r Docket No. M.J %2 Report No. i;-o Sciip2/Mo'dule A'?r G e ?' r w.;,
Page Z of y DOCUMENTS EXAMINED
/Lvn5 (c)1, 7't. - '
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
'r' 285 SW w a t 9! fo che,.s ;- ?c.
f,.-/ c-f G/(,/cs 7/c,7
'~
6'r llr,-
/c'
,:. c/ /, ;, ;i
-,,,./ ca cy'so,
/;'
'%fy /,5,c,., fir gs Y sin / Goe ho / Br rl: :
.,,, m c
/. n!
,,, e, p g < _,,;./,,.< c a-,c.l,c,,
,,,m
,=,kyp5 Q,.
J' S / l -i>,;-
< -,, ?7,. h ' t,. c - 92 T 4.
(/)
/, /3 /
' '>.: j e,.,ft{).c 7), y e,J PixsdI' r c=
2
'?-,C !
/
ren
/%rJYr !s= G 1 >> is a 7' irs,
);',
Pse/
.(M
<! n 27
A 't y i - die n fA,/
~
/
ft g / - r/
f ca,/cm dm/le n-(3)
>,, 4, / 2
^ S/sa i c./ 4,,si c /Lw:/c <ri c A/4,i, _ C fa c !c
,, (- 7f O
t 4'
& $' ?. /
' L _,,J n,,, n f.,i / 7, e, w c br. n wa%
s_
< - s c/G I/,c PW//n/' ' '
3 - 4'
, W
/
[5] 1 ? '/. 3 6'c'!ca s us, c-4 e d / b rs,r !i n :
~r' N Ntr-
_.u -2 5 -J'f
&)
.{ r 2, /
/] - r+ / y s A >,/ Qo c > $;jr a /,cn
&s 0*,- 7' /%> A/
o
'j Mv ! 7,,m /,>,oitY foi / '- / '/ P 3
^'i,6 s, a /s
?-r2-9 5
[7]
%. 4 2. /
C 67n c (~ 7ti>:e /rc re=lure t% r/'cr ( *r Lea-A?cci f/pp/g "
9'-Jt'- 7f_
/
(S)iw
' C,2, /?pid >y Ad Ab'6 cp "
7-/?-??
3 c ro f, >
c Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchasc0rder 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
Insp ctor
/'E. 6//g,
Docket tio. per'w/
Report fio. fa-ce Scope /Mo'dule No>eferd'r/n, Page S of 7 DOCUMEf1TS EXAMIfiED j
Mrros5 Ce,17'<o/
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 2 tal) 3(cc.r?.)
6,) je. 5../ _ " j;u y p,7;, y,,-ja/ fg3yg p, c(p rfci,g p.f.yy g
?
3
& /Y,*,. sic /W//iirc /', e, ( p /c,,,.:. 5 pp c,f; r a fy,,1 ('coras ) csn:/ Sc,,,ey7-A bro Aso l67s /;f,'ra & O rc,fsfor.9) (c, re f ra c1he c-prj me t'/b aPS 46 - d'd? --f, f a n/Pc.c Av. sc6 /J7o' / y.g.ppn,./
pc w ye.-/d'c/ c4 L/ p-y-y9 9'm -79
/
(h I tvPS - // /7//3 -j --S er n/ f' psi' AL, Wl" ch/Wi-9-7%#cl rerA' A'<>
s'c 7,44/9-i-79 5/? - ??
I
-+'
.f fck o,c /prerA r,,,c,' < bh c e f' &J, ira des i% ujG c /c. r i >r ?
,% rec. She ds "l/r'l$vmlc on/r?'A' a, c/crewdr &<
(cdrY cl
-r.
.i
,v., c
't 2 3 3',
(;) Ao s'c 7. C x c c c tri= v f LA
[2 ) 4 ', / 74~ / X 6 s
A>) 4g, /7ra y o
~
~
(~)
- w. /ff, / x c' n
(t) 4's, /PP,) <a is ir (6)
Ic. /h', 5 < 0 (7) er 45. z >< c'
~
_y>
< e, y,5 5
<c n
foi Av d'7 f x 0 (cc.rt. )
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas? Order 1.
Sequential Item fiumber 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
Inspector 4' E C//g,
Docket No. c W r W P Report No. f M -
Scope /Molfule / Van 6c7' rmc P^92 "
IY e
DOCUMENTS EXAMINED
/9c c^P S S Gil?'<cl 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 6
9 h/:(viiw wrci/c (ci, c i s f,i> c of* M/5ecn ar se
-s,, &cArin-r
!%< m a v; p or 3/c e,,mce7'::l% <urO;. ec 4l /h, fi c /r D N4-> rei s er i en n -, fl> c / c~ bz13 3
// ) e -
/ -5 +'. / v C f -i ciersnf A: A.
OI 1s
/ff, /,Vc~
Sy -2 D) r-
/ff!/ x /
SA ' -2 d
i
. R- /:D ira (s(? r, /c (r/'S ///,n e-6f A "f C _<
[C r r c' fcul:" ?" cff.a !
,, 4 4 NQi ce,fra c f M. (!9Z T?
I
<,rir,,f GI / s.
/59 Y
.c A m e..
/ge u
~
(3).L's
/61/ YC s'
(x) fe
/65 x c:
7
?
r, n.n r ' > ar.-,l < fr <le 's 4 ; <si>//sa isikv /> > <; we ?'<esi m ; A 0 rn l/ o $r thc';verfbrs' 5
'n :. / c.- racer./< evi> c;< %',,o ef* ffff Diw ir z% cc,t s f<r
/
f 1
c'c v'rd'c/1, c - o z Tz :
J
(,') Sci. /$W, / Y /
Cc: r rf *r!
i+{A.
G) V, /7 '. /X S (ce.i/. )
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchase 0rder 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
Inspector
- 'f. n//e r Docket tio. Ps'TcP2 Report tio. y x /'
Scdpe/Hodule Mr fbr/onn c Pa9' 5 Of F DOCUMEflTS EXAMINED M-r?Ss Cer ~/re;/
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 MnU
?lec f.1
( 3) Av / 7 =;c x rx c cc,,o,, f
,v. A.
(-d t's. / 7-x i x 3 l'
J c/. reeen / e f~ Tc.r %;,4,,,, /,'ralic s kr th cr' /'im ererViesz bren?
I'c n ra c ( /C% C-9 2 33 c; e, p,, F
<e A Gim GA<a r f *e r c
M i
F*e /b a si>c Wrc r/c (c s>gtc1'in o
<- f i /P f g
}Qf'n j.c V
61 4 b'4', 2
- c' c a;ty;-n! f% fe g.
c c,,,,,,L gg.
I b AI' 14</.3 Yd SV, r/7-ng,
?/a /ps i.
Gr)
M.
/46, 7 x 0
& cSe d' kl ci-
/Sc / xe
, :c. ; r,Ws (c) su & 3. 2 -YG,
di usr7'7's
[
f l
(
//
A%cr,._ / cf li'P{ 4. / 76. /k' T fc < si, _?O s r n,e=rfic7 r S ro r c re ser/5/ne
'/r<<
pns / w/c/ furxeser ffeess tr'//efo,ner ctY/c/r c c//rh Y m A1
/2
/
'A's/-rie h Ak<elc ? s W fc4-,,/;ficcW,'cs 4 c " G4 w /c fn <s~ M//e.z)
/2 F
" 7<4rn8I?ra r'/Nn cy.' Mi4ria /ps / e,sibia /// A. oc ich 5 sit v -
/i
/u
/
Gc'.i//4 e<< //b,, n,:;/ n:rr/> firs'/<en &c.,cn/c fer^,% iea tLO P h c GI<r w t.c
/6
/
th<,,h af w //,;c irshren/cc.>. fro /
~
/
/G 9
,4S8 ' Ced'p s*e c//Ni, ir ycm /,4 e a f/5 rerc,h f ccvs;' n u;A.,
reccr/s 7G.
J'/ 7c>f sw/Ehrs,
//
(cenf)
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchase 0rder 1.
Sequential Item tiumber 2.
Speci fica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
Inspector p.5 N//gi Docket tio. N =~5%:
Report tio. 3:e Scbpe/Ho'dule A'd' ek r Non c P'9'
- *'}
DOCUMENTS EXAMINED Secr>SS (~rn7to/
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 O
2
.f4vv r' I:4>A s 47 c,,- c. - f
- c ca /<cs G, L /3 5 ccdvacf i
re. 92 33
% A, : ra nes f'r %
,12.,, hw ;&= giea i ni dr e eic:,y> s r;,, / M %', o ? rv?'/r&, 6.i;s y,n, M /e
% >7 A - har _tYe*$ri, 64 lf 2
- 4 &.
/
e l...
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas#0rder 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
Inspector
-# E. O/hr Docket tio. Md"3M Report tio. S -cv Scope /Mo'dule A7a' eiv/ A, c4 /s DOCUMEfiTS EXAMIf1ED 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
9' If3 CA %wtr?/ Loc ~/em /5 %/, */s '
is=n -Si
+
2
=:
X, 6 w? 9 m s,
,o cc-fora e ev. ori na a, <h/c < na unnc.e i r
llr(i/cs,
.,,_ c/ yw r /$r/>:n n n:= bfi,,$r1 c t/ t? /r'lS ror L
(ii /!s, 4 /f ~ o,-a /fic c 4.,,,../ tai ;/~e:2 7',,
c /'Ac // i' 1
n,., i,iw / "
S-Sc; - ?F a
G,) A v. / c: i " 4c </,% c; s -z= 4-Sc 3
3 Y
Abec,;/ cl',4c _ /, ~ / Sc4$/c/r &s /Vf '2 4
A' N
V' c, -,,, /s
<< n << < f h e ef Ji,4 e >, << / AfucAlO'>a f//h ( r.u c'I r
ys /7 bd ivren/c s'
/\\
(".ls - l //cf d ' *.. V'- <* p UA
/
pJ <%,4/A im Sr - sv /m i a i.z... ();,,/ Y )
7lS/
(3) c% kr
- m. If/-O' (r!a v,f;f)
S /E '
M (As,4 6 < T 44 f/-59
/2 4's
@)
Orc /r//S7 M, O J-GP /v -avc///)
.i //
C Y
&<<r,lef 4,.e4&vei/ LBT -5 rn,;, u /,;cc /;f /x y 1-ire !5la< ic/<rs?Y~ cf
?4
/)< r <= c fc r' s c7 c !iu F fiF s.
///IS'/
O Y
fikrcrc/c c>i_,y,s / dica //c,. e,/cyif, DrcL//c,r Ec r mhr-_
ctter'/ / ps v $cn n e/.
/- p J:2-Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchasc' Order 1.
Sequential Item fiumber 2.
Speci fica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
/E 6//ar Docket No.FMrJ%a f'
Inspector Report No. f 2 -ce Scope /Mo'dule M-rce s fer mcencr ~s Page f of 9 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED l ' err <= c/td'e //rfic ir
/
s o,c 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
//
//i5 0A' %'t4y.i / 5e e?/rs? 9' '"4l>,ceafersrcrs:no A.-lGrrerfrw
//c fic,>
n 'o-si a
2 9
fe//c.wis,c 14'S,,, c rr /c/rr=s :
l's) At'. /,' /d %5erp/Ose~ Er Z4= Gn!rc/ O~ 4'er> FP O'!? 4$
, i.
/rs
& s, re - rG rn is7o-G s -// 9 m s fs2) /$i? / /2 fc > fr2
- r' k(f/NJ C'(WhUfW Y'*^'
l t
2 9
& c,,
/ r l'
ff >i-re n Ee r snen rp 2 e <, "
G r'c f
' M'
//
J'
/'i5,rrsfc (c'/'s/ CYr ire r/~ h,-) sh'(rs:'/A'f/r27l'rf YPWfb 6$lec/
i m-C - SV3 g ccn> d n,
iu./ /
c,,
T l
/f's eer/, r'
" e -, o f e- //a v 4rfic->> J cc "
c'u rn> sr f
^
6 5
4&rnh rcdisin.~o c f h ;r c'cirt= k /c r d e f/c.x /I$cicesis c e vrc:d v
/
/&cc <c7's en s c $m, e i ^ V/ rep Gvreckp 4 cVib'ir c
Scwxrwru nh/>ei$-
. +>. S'- C
- w. s'z -/ cmci'Mo 82 -z
_cc rred j-Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchase 0rder 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
\\
>u.?
)
i e
%cc r
l e
b b
a 92 m
c Fp u
i 4
N l
C A'
ttp oo 4
mnnp NN eeea t mm tt I uuf er ccI k o l oo(
cp ADD 2-oe i
n DR tffo fc nooi e
s ueei 3
sqpt v 5
neyae mSTDR u
l g
o h
C1234 d
r w
/
m
,s A
eI n
/s b
-c c
G a l
/
e
~
4 2
r D
6 r
E s
N T
h w C w
I C
/
/
M E
r p
A J
X B
6 r
/
s 7
E U
i S
c w
S
/
h 7
}
T E
-1 u
N L
f s
i E
T
?
E
)
M I
y U
T C
Y R
r O
P W 4
(F as D
2 s
4 e
/.
r C
c 5
r
/
e n
3 7
4 r
f
!'r p
i
=
c
?
p y
=
ro f
r r
em i
/c w
S de c
g rM e
M
/
o p
w
/e S
c rl c /
a
(
h anr m
n hrer r
/
cet e h
Y n
rtth unet S
4
(
c PILO 6
w f
s e
?
1 d
/
'c 5678 z
/
4
/
n 7
o
(
'4 i
s t
r e
ael r
e 3
/
p cra 2
y gi u u g
Tnfd n iiea t wccM e
naeo l
erprA u
mDSPQ r
'd u
o 0
c
/
?
o t
4 i
c
/
1 D1234 e
e p
p s
d n
c S
I
'lllr ll
PERSONS CONTACTED Company As/n'r4 Brr dge ~/ Bee / fcisyr s]u Dates A9< < < 3-7 /76Z j
J Docket / Report No. 7/Mc?P/z//2-f/
Inspector S E WF' l k's d'yif % p Yi>>y -
Pa9e I of
/
x 4/foordc 1AME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print) n &,diH nfp fxprular Mrp finsidd J s9]
T.
ca.,ec/,c ~ d, u,>Wcasa 4% s,/s,, f J
G'A A cl/1?//r /S fic? YC 7 ks 1? /.
f 5
W W Ji> na g
}> i sc fer - QA x
//
Jb re vic s n& finsiWre/-Eng/>?rdr,17 J
J n
H
/c,,h,* f CAM Jfrar/c/rcr/EctsePr u
$7 Wr19Ah fi sn ee lie s, Fct ror?nst
)
s O
a J