ML20055B040
| ML20055B040 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/30/1982 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Jonas W LAKESIDE BRIDGE & STEEL CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055B041 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900342 NUDOCS 8207200290 | |
| Download: ML20055B040 (2) | |
Text
.
330 M Docket:
99900342/82-01 Lakeside Bridge and Steel Company ATTN:
Mr. W. E. Jonas Director, Quality Assurance 5300 N. 33rd Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209 Gentlemen:
This refers to the QA program inspection conducted by Mr. R. E. Oller of this office on May 3-7, 1982, of your facility at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, associated with the manufacture of containment system component and component supports and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. G. Behnke and other members of the plant staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA program is being effectively implemented.
The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being achieved; nor to assure that a specific product, component, or service provided by you to your customers is of acceptable quality.
As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components, or services procured from others.
You should, therefore, not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents, nor from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.
Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements.
The specific finding.and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
Please provide us within 30 days from the date of this letter a written statement containing: (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items; (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence; and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
RIV CI: R& CPS CPS BC:VP D:IES R6ifflV RE0ller/rf I
UPotapov EHJohnson JTl bilins 6/22/2(g 6/2g/82 6/ /82 6/Ja/82 6
&{arlg;)N
f 0207200290 820630 y
PDR GA999 EMVLAKE 99900342 PDR L\\L
.. s s
Lakeside Bridge and Steel Company - <
The response requested by this letter is not subject to the clearance pro-cedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork-Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
In accordance with 10 lFR 2.790 of the Commiss' ion's regulations, a copy of this letter and the en:losed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information'that you' believe to be exempt f rom disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the-date of this letter of your ir:ention to file a request for withholding; and (b) sub-mit within 25 days fro 1 the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold suci information.
If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than seven days are available for your review, please notify this office pro 1ptly so that a new due date may be established.
Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a_ full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure.
This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).
The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possibl.e into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you_in this regard within the specified periods.noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will'be pleased to discuss them with you.
~
l Sincerely,
$15ned bys
- 0rici?st,
- u. P.OTAPOVS**
Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Programs Branch I
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A - Notice of Nonconformsnce 2.
Appendix B - Inspection Report No. 99900342/82-01 3.
Appendix C - Inspection Data Sheets-(10.Pages) bcc-IE Files ASME AEOD NBB&VPI ii QAB
~
NRC:PDR Reg. Administrators I, II, III, IV, V EHJohnson, RIV
_