ML20055B009

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Corrected Monthly Refueling Info Requests for May 1982
ML20055B009
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/15/1982
From: Reavis J
DUKE POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20055B006 List:
References
NUDOCS 8207200251
Download: ML20055B009 (2)


Text

_

..t y.

MONTF N.ETUEt,ljjG I Nro.vtAT 1033 RE0uM1 1.

Facility name:

Oconee Unit 2 2.-

Scheduled next refueling shutdown:

October 1983 3.

Scheduled restart following refueling:

December.1983 l

4.

Will refueling or resumption of operation thereaf ter require a technical spacification change or other license amendment?

Yes If yes, what will these be?

Technical Specification Revision' If no, has reload design and core configuration been reviewed by Safety Review Co=mittee regarding unreviewed safety questions?

N/A If no, when is review scheduled?

N/A 5.

Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action and supporting inf o rma tion :

Unknown 6.

I=portant licensing considerations (new or dif ferent design or supplier, un:eviewed design or performance analysis methods, significant changes in design or new operating procedures).

7.

Number of fuel assemblies (a) in the core:

177 (b) in the spent fuel pool:

724*

8.

Present licensed fuel pool capacity:

1312*

Size of requested or planned increase:

9.

Projected date of last refueling which can be accommodated by present licensed capacity:

DUKE PC'.JER COMPAtri Date:

June 15, 1982 Name of

Contact:

J. A. Reavis

  • Renrosanec
  • ba total for the combined Units 1 & 2 i 8207200251 820715 PDR ADOCK 05000269 R

PDR

[t0,qji Q RFM.Eg JG INFADNAT g ?f,Q a-i 1.

Facility name:

Oconee Unit 3 i

2.

Scheduled next refueling shutdown:

Unknown 3.

Scheduled restart following refueling:

Unknown i

j t

4.

Will refueling or resumption of operation thereafter require a technical specification change or other license amendment?

Yes If yes, what will these be?

Technical Specification Revision If no, has reload design and core configuration been reviewed by Safety Review Committee regarding unreviewed safety questions?

N/A If no, when is review scheduled?

N/A 5.

Scheduled date(s) for submitting pro osed licensing action and supporting inf o rma tion:

Unknown 6.

I=portant licensing considerations (new or dif ferent design or supplier, unreviewed design or performance analysis methods, significant-changes in design or new operating procedures).

t 7.

Number of fuel assemblies (a) in the core: Refueling (b) in the spent fuel pool:

371 8.

Present licensed fuel pool capacity:

474 Size of requested or planned increase:

9.

Projected date of last refueling which can be accommodated by present licensed capacity:

DUKE POWER COMPANY Date:

June 15, 1982 Name of

Contact:

_.J. A. Reavis

.=

=

_,