ML20054F371

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Submits Response to NRC 820421 Request for Addl Info Re IE Bulletin 80-04, Analysis of PWR Main Steam Line Break W/Continued Feedwater Addition. Reactor return-to-power Will Be Impeded by Loss of Offsite Power
ML20054F371
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/1982
From: Mardis D
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To: Stolz J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
REF-SSINS-6820 3F-0682-12, IEB-80-04, TAC-46831, NUDOCS 8206160168
Download: ML20054F371 (2)


Text

s'

. d@fe p[g$l$h 9d%fo Z@6G UD,e, hQu

  • bQ w <,w. awgwf

+m.

M Power C O A P O n a 7 a 0 es June 11,1982

  1. 3F-0682-12 File: 3-0-3-a-4 Mr. John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Subject:

Crystal River Unit 3 Docket No. 50-302 Operating License No. DPR-72 Reactivity Response Resulting from Main Steam Line Break with Continued Feedwater Addition (IE Bulleting 80-04)

Dear Mr. Stoiz:

Florida Fower Corporation hereby submits the response to your request for additional information (dated April 21, 1932) regarding PWR Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) with Continued Feedwater Addition (IE Bulletin 80-04).

Question:

Provide the information concerning your analysis of reactivity response which results from a MSLB with continued feedwater addition:

1. An evaluation to determine whether the reactor return to power is more sensitive for normal power availability or loss of offsite power.

Response

Reactor return-to-power will be impeded by a loss of offsite power.

Please note the last sentence on page 3 of the report entitled

" Evaluation of Reactivity Response for a Steam Line Break Event with uninterrupted Emergency Feedwater Flow" (see our letter dated September 3,1981).

Under the assumption stated in the previous paragraph (i.e., offsite power was available), overcooling would occur. Howeve, if offsite power were not available, pumps used to circulate water through the steam generators might not be functioning and thus, cooling by heat transfer across the steam

(

generators might not occur.Section IV of the report stated that

\\

with the conservative assumptions presented including the continued feedwater addition, subcriticality can be maintained.

Thus, 8206160168 820611 PDR ADOCK 05000302 G

PDR

\\

General Office 3201 Thirty-fourtn street soutn. P O Box 14042. St Petersburg. Fionda 33733 e 813-866-5151

l John F. Stolz, Chief

)

June 11,1982 Page 2 l

by inserting even more negative reactivity due to an increase in water temperature by the loss of feedwater flow, a reactor return-to-power will not be experienced.

Very truly yours, dd David G. Mardis Acting Manager Nuclear Licensing MAF:mm cc:

Mr. 3. P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator Office of Inspection & Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory C' u.sion 101 Marietta Street N.W., Saite 3100 Atlanta, GA 30303 n

f

.