ML20054F194
| ML20054F194 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/26/1982 |
| From: | Chamberlain D, Chamberlin D, Foster W, Hale C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054F180 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900403 NUDOCS 8206150300 | |
| Download: ML20054F194 (22) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _.
ORGANIZATION:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.:
99900403/82-01 DATE(S) 2/22-26/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 58 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
General Electric Company Nuclear Energy Business Operations ATTN:
Mr. W. H. Bruggeman Vice President and General Manager 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, California 95125 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
Mr. A. Breed, Manager, Quality Assurance TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(408) 925-2726 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Nuclear Steam System Supplier NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: General Electric Compaty, Nuclear Energy Business Operations (NEB 0), has a work force of approximateiy 7650 people with approxi-mately 98% of that work force devoted to domestic nuclear activity.
NEB 0 currently has 26 reactor units under construction and 4 reactor units under contract.
NEB 0 also has approximately 115 service contracts with various clients.
G 0 /b Sh6/@-
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
D. D. Q3 iderlainks/ftor Systems Section (RSS)
Date' h
OTHER INSPECTOR (S): W. E. Foster, Reactive & Components Program Section C
I!
5bMkA.
Q APPROVED BY:
s C. J@le, thief [R$5 Date # ~
~
INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
General Electric Topical Report No. NED0-11209-04A and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.
B.
SCOPE:
See next page.
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
Docket Numbers 50-416/417, 50-466/467, 50-556/557, 50-461/462, 50-367, 50-354/355, 50-410, 50-440/441, 50-458/459, 50-522/523, 50-373/374,50-373/374,50-466/467,50-553/554,and50-518/519/520/52gU DESIO)gg OW j
th ('OLO b Cortified "7 h
E 04 PDR
ORGANIZATION:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900403/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 10 B.
SCOPE:
Status of previous inspection findings and follow up on the following requests:
1.
Allegations that General Electric (GE) San Jose had sent technical publications to licensees containing known errors.
2.
Region III request regarding potential document control problems at GE (LaSalle project).
3.
10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report (River Bend project) stating that the heat loads provided by GE to Stone & Webster (S&W) for sizing the heating and ventilating (HVAC) system in the high pressure coolant injection (HPCI) system diesel generator room were about one-third of the expected value.
4.
10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report (TVA) stating that GE was not performing 50.55(e) evaluation of potential reportable conditions as required.
Additionally, this inspection was coaducted as a result of Mississippi Power and Light Company's issuance of 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) reports pertaining to (1) inadequate circuit separation in Power Generation Control Complexes (PGCC), (2) incorrect assembly of PGCC cable connectors, (3) termination of size 8 AWG and smaller wire in junction boxes of PGCC termination cabinets, (4) inability to adjust transmitters ana trip units for the reactor vessel water level scrams, (5) improper contact arrangement of Series 20, Type PR-20 Electro Switch, and (6) incompatibility between design documents and termina-tion cabinets.
Items (5) and (6) were partially evaluated during a previous inspection.
All items refer to hardware supplied to the Grand Gulf Nuclear Generating Station.
ORGANIZATION:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900403/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 10 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
1.
Contrary to Section 5 of Topical Report No. NED0-11209-04A, Revision 3, dated August 1981, and paragraph 5.1 of Fire Test Specification No. A00-626 (Design Record File No. A00-794-6),
the final test report for the fire test had not been signed by the performer.
Prior to the close of this inspection, the inspector was provided a copy of a letter that gave an interpretation of the headings identified on the test report cover sheet.
Additionally, the test report cover sheet was modified by adding a heading entitled "Per-formed By". This heading was completed by the typed name and signature of the performer and the date.
Since corrective and preventive actions were taken before the end of the inspection, no further written response is required.
2.
Contrary to Section 5 of Topical Report No. NEDO-11209-04A, Revision 3, dated August 1981, and paragraph,5.3.3 of Manufacturing Standard Practice (MSP) No. 10.003, Revision 3, dated February 26, 1981, Section. 11 of the Power Generation Control Complex Cable Assembly Instruction Manual had not been released to the station where the specified task (connector preassembly) was being accomplished.
The above paragraph of MSP 10.003 indicated that individual sections may be released to the floor for use in cable manufacturing.
It was apparent that responsible individuals elected to release sections to the floor, as evidenced by appropriate sections at work stations.
ORGANIZATION:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900403/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 10 Prior to the close of this inspection, the inspector was provided a copy of a letter and its attached Corrective Action Request, a sample Surveillance Program Check Sheet, and an " Advanced Copy" of MSP No. 10.003, Revision 4, dated February 25, 1982.
Since corrective and preventive actions were taken before the end of this inspection, no further written response is required.
3.
Contrary to Section 5 of Topical Report No. NE00-11209-04A, Revision 3, dated August 1981, and paragraph IV.B of Nuclear Energy Business Group Procedure No. 70-42, Revision 4, dated March 27, 1981, requested additional information, or a schedule for such information, had not been provided within 5 working days after receipt of the request.
The request was made to Quality Assurance in a memorandum, dated May 27, 1981, with a required response date of June 5, 1981.
The memorandum trans-mitting the requested infortnation was dated June 26, 1981.
The date that Quality Assurance received the memorandum of May 27, 1981, is not verifiable because it was not date stamped upon receipt.
However, it was received prior to June 5, 1981, as evidenced by its (subject matter /PRC No.) inclusion in a Quality Assurance status report dated June 5, 1981.
4.
Contrary to the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B and procedure E0P 30-10.00 Section 1.6, no Engineering Review Memorandum (ERM) existed to document the required reviews of GEK-75662A -
Clinton 1 - Operation and Maintenance Instructions - High Pressure Core Spray System.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-03):
Material Requests (MRs) for safety-related components were not being accomplished and controlled by established procedures and standing instructions.
Quality Control Standing Instruction (QCSI) 7.2.18 and Engineering Operating Procedure (EOP) 42-5.00 were revised to strengthen and clarify program requirements for tracking, review, and filing of MRs and Purchase Orders (P.O.).
Also, an internal management memo was directed to all QC Engineers concerning the need for strict compliance with QCSI 7.2.18 regarding MR/P0 control.
ORGANIZATION:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900403/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 5 of 10 E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
i 1.
Technical Publications to Licensees Containing Known Errors - This area of inspection resulted from a Region V request for follow up at GE on allegations regarding technical publications, containing known errors, being sent to licensees.
The concerns related to Operation and Main-tenance (0&M) Instruction Manuals for GE supplied systems.
Applicable procedures were examined to determine program requirements relative to O&M manuals.
The following documents were examined in order to verify implementation of the program requirements:
a typical list of standard NSSS O&M instruction manuals; nine issued 0&M manuals; and four Engineering Review Memoranda which document the required engineering review of the 0&M manuals.
The review ranged from a spot check (for such things as control rod drive voltages) of the issued O&M manuals against the draft copy that was reviewed by engineering to a word for word proofreading of 20 randomly selected pages of O&M manual GEK-7577, Grand Gulf 1 and 2, Operation and Maintenance Instructions, Fuel Handling Platform.
Problems identified from the review were as follows:
a.
No ERM existed to document the required review of one manual.
A nonconformance was issued for this item (see item B.4 above).
b.
The issued copy of Manual GEK-75662A did not include three lines on one page examined.
The missing lines were a description of certain automatic fault lock-out conditions for the fuel handling platform operation.
GE procedures require that batween initial Operation and Maintenance Instruction Manual distribution and plant turnover, or a date agreed upon by the project office, necessary changes will be made to the manuals via errata and addenda.
At the time of plant turnover, or a date agreed upon by the project office, the manual will be reviewed for required corrections and issued.
Therefore, any errors detected would be corrected during the final issue.
The 0&M manuals are based on approved and verified design documents and contain copies of selected design documents and the O&M manuals require engineering review and approval.
The 0&M manuals for safety-related equipment l
are very similar from project to project, therefore, the same technical information receives many reviews during project completion.
It I
appeared that GE was encountering some problems with typographical errors on recent draft manuals due to typing of an entire manual for the first time on a word processing machine.
However, there was no evidence to indicate that the manuals were being issued with a large number of typographical errors or being issued with known errors.
This item is considered closed with respect to concerns regarding GE issuing O&M manuals with known errors.
l l
ORGANIZATION:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900403/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 6 of 10 2.
Potential Document Control Problems at GE (La Salle project) -
During a Region III project specific (La Salle) inspection of GE, discrepancies were identified relative to the reference document revision numbers listed in GE Design Report 22A7431, Main Steam Piping and Equipment Loads, and the document revision numbers listed in computer printouts and in the GE Engineering Information System (EIS).
The EIS is a computer listing of GE design documents which shows the latest revision status.
The design report noted was a stress report and the report was certified to the applicable revisions of input l
documents on December 15, 1981.
The reference documents noted in the design report were revised, but the revisions had no effect on the results.
Three additional design reports were examined and certain reference documents were compared to the EIS computer printout.
No discrepancies were identified.
Since a certification of stress reports is required for applicable input documents, the one case noted where the reference documents list did not indicate the latest revision is not considered a problem.
This item is considered closed.
3.
10 CFR Part 50.55(e) From River Bend Project - This area of inspec-tion resulted from a 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report from the River Bend project stating that the heat loads provided to S&W by GE for the sizing of HVAC in the HPCI diesel generator room were about one-third the actual values.
An S&W engineer apparently questioned the values of heat radiation provided.
GE had provided S&W with heat load values in a specification for preliminary sizing of HVAC equipment.
The diesel generator was supplied by Stewart and Stephenson (S&S) and values of heat radiation were indicated in an operation manual.
When S&W questioned the values provided, GE contacted S&S and an S&S engineer provided a memo with a revised value which was about three times the preliminary GE value and the value provided by the S&S manual.
No explanation was given for the higher value or the original value.
GE is presently evaluating this item as a potentially reportable condition and apparently no final value has been provided to S&W.
Morrison Knudsen also provides HPCI diesel generators to GE and their heat load value was also lower (about one-third to one-half) than the latest value provided by S&S.
GE stated that the following sites could be affected; La Salle, Nine Mile Point 2, Perry, Clinton, River Bend, Hanford, Grand Gulf, Allens Creek, TVA (all), Skagit, and Black Fox.
This item will remain open pending further review at S&W, S&S and GE.
ORGANIZATION:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900403/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 7 of 10 4.
10 CFR Part 50.55(e) From Hartsville Project - This area of inspection resulted from a 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report for Hartsville and Phipps Bend (TVA) stating that GE has not been advising TVA of GE initiated potentially reportable conditions (PRC's) or of GE or C. F. Braun initiated STRIDE Design Deficiency Reports (SDDR's) and that GE has not been evaluating these PRC's and 500R's for reportability in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50.55(e).
Upon review of this item, it was noted that an NRC staff meeting was held on December 10, 1981, at the request of GE, to discuss how 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) data is being applied to non-licensee organizations.
GE was advised by the NRC staff that the Construction Permit (CP) holder must assure, through instructions to his contractors, that he is informed of matters reportable under 50.55(e) and that the CP holder and his contractor must decide On whether contract requirements on this issue are being satisfied.
GE's present method is to evaluate both deficiencies and deviations under 10 CFR Part 21 criteria and once a condition is deter-mined not to be reportable ur. der Part 21, the licensee is not notified of the condition.
As a result of the December 10, 1981, meeting, the NRC staff informed GE that additional guidance regarding the subject would be issued, probably in the form of an Information Notice.
GE procedures E0P 65-4.00 (Potentially Reportable Conditions) and Group Procedure 70-42 (Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance Under 10 CFR Part 21 or Part 50.55(e)) were reviewed and they provide the necessary control for GE to meet their reporting requirements to the NRC.
This item is considered c~.ased with respect to concerns regarding GE reporting requirements to the NRC.
5.
Status of Previously Inspected Items:
a.
Electro Switch, Series 20, Type PR Investigative activity is continuing.
An action item has been assigned to Quality Assurance and identified in an internal letter.
The action item indicates that Quality Assurance should
ORGANIZATION:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900403/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 8 of 10 (1) verify that switches with mirror image contacts had not been shipped to other users, and (2) determine how an improperly configured switch was shipped to the user.
This item remains open and will be evaluated during a future inspection.
b.
Incompatibility of Design Documentation with Shipped Ter-mination Cabinets - The inspector was informed that this deficiency occurred due to lack of control of test assemblies, i.e. changes were made to the test assemblies as a result of changes in cable ladders and termination points during the staging activity.
Currently, test assemblies are subjected to the same design control measures as deli" arable hardware.
This practice was instituted prior to compl.te shipment of hardware for Grand Gulf 1.
The problem appears isolated to the Grand Gulf Nuclear Generating Station.
It should be noted that test assemblies are substitutes for the termination cabinets which are shipped about a year prior to the staging activity at the factory.
The inspector was informed that incorporation of checklists into design record files was a separate and unrelated issue regarding incompatibility of design documentation with shipped termination cabinets.
A review of contractual documents failed to reveal a require-ment for supplying "as shipped" drawings.
Design record files were reviewed for incorporation of checklists.
Check-lists had been incorporated and reflected design verification.
Actions related to this area of the inspection appear adequate.
l This item is closed.
6.
10 CFR Part 50.55(e) Reports From Mississippi Power and Light Company (MP&L Co.).
a.
Concerning inadequate circuit separation in the Power Generation Control Complexes (PGCC) at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (GGNS 1 & 2), the inspector was informed that:
(1) The exact cause of the problem had not been identified; 1
l l
l
l GRGANIZATION:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPEGi10N NO.:
99900403/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 9 of 10 (2) Reg Guide 1.75 and IEEE 384 became effective at or near completion of the design phase of the PGCC for GGNS, Unit 1; and (3) Available talent perceived that the wiring complied with the requirements.
Continuous education and evaluation revealed this perception to be in error.
Fire tett specifi-cation, fire test report calculations, and other pertinent data for these analyses and tests had been incorporated into Design Record File No. A00-794-6.
A review of this file and other related information indicated that adequate corrective action had been taken or planned.
During the review, it was noted that a test report did not contain the signature of the performer as required by the test specification.
This was documented as a nonconformance. (See B.1 above). Prior to the close of this inspection, the inspector was provided a copy of a letter that gave an inter-pretation of the headings identified on the test report cover sheet.
Additionally, the test report cover sheet was modified by adding a heading entitled " Performed By."
This heading was completed by the typed name and signature of the performer and the date.
Since corrective and preventive actions were taken, no further response is required.
b.
Concerning incorrect assembly of cable connectors on PGCC cables for GGNS1, the MP&L Co. final report dated June 12, 1981, indicated that the deficiency was not reportable; however, the inspector elected to evaluate actions taken.
The inspector (1) observed preassembly of cable connectors and pin insertion, and (2) reviewed inspection records and special study test data.
While observing pin insertion, it was noted that the work bench contained four disassembled connectors.
The inspector inquired as to the method used for assuring that reassembly was correct and was advised that this practice would be evaluated.
While observing connector preassembly it was noted that the appropriate section of the PGCC Cable Assembly Instruction Manual had not been issued to the work station.
This was documented as a non-conformance (see B.2 above).
Corrective and preventive actions were taken prior to the close of this inspection; no further response is required.
This item is considered closed.
ORGANIZATION:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900403/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 10 of 10 c.
Concerning termination of size e AwG and sma11er wire in junction boxes of PGCC termination cabinets supplied for GGNS 1 and 2, the MP&L Co. final report, dated August 10, 1981, indicated that the deficiency was not reportable; however, the inspector elected to evaluate actions taken.
An unmounted junction box terminal block with attached sizes 8 AWG and 14 AWG wires was observed, as well as an actual installation in a remote shutdown vertical board.
Also, drawings and manufacturing standard practices governing assembly were reviewed.
All appeared in order and this item is considered closed.
d.
Transmitters and trip units for reactor vessel water level scrams supplied for GGNS 1 can not be adjusted to the specified setting.
The Potentially Reportable Condition File, No. 81-23 contained (1) an internal memorandum, dated April 20, 1981, which provided explicit details of the problem, and (2) a memo of telecon, dated August 19, 1981, which announced verbal notification to the Commission.
It was not apparent, from reviewing the file, that further evaluation was underway from April 20 to August 19, 1981; however, it was apparent that the written report to the Commission, dated August 19, 1981, contained no information significantly different from that contained in the internal memorandum, dated April 20, 1981.
The file indicated the following activities were underway from April 20 to August 19, 1981:
(1) icentification of the cause of the problem; (2) extent of the problem, and (3) correction of the cause.
Information in the file indicated the problem was the misapplication of equipment caused by "an engineering mistake in choosing the transmitters to be used."
During the exit interview, exception was taken to the NRC inspector's observations regarding the length of time between awareness and reporting of the problem.
It was noted that additional information (requested by the Manager of Safety and Licensing from Quality Assurance),
regarding transmitters and trip units for reactor vessel water level scrams, had not been provided within the time required by NEBG Procedure No. 70-42.
This was documented as a nonconformance (see B.3 above).
PERSONS CONTACTED
'Compa'ny C~r a l fle lo t - Ai<. b - r-enp 8.u;.su, 6 p.
Datos 3 /n - a c h a Docket / Report No. ??'l ce 4 c)h]- -/
Inspector L L f, /'., r en Page /
of I
MME(Please Print)
TITl.E(Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print)
M c. J b d.;,
/L 1, ( C,,.:,.1: n. l. - O A 0 <..sk I,,, J m l,.. ~,. R, m ; t (o rd l T.r. I%) ~ l Le - Pr. -. ez! Cd I U-;:
ncw tiro 1
1 b, O fn e_k lf v Seer >
bHoh bn
(<n "of
( ** E D i
NS n a < ' * - 9 0 [lfe d. i, r._ 67
( Y [~ D bJ. l)ff _.
.n 1
b* A $ I b
M.inapn./JonfAthw.t l /I C. C A %; 7.t e k o n - ) (ov e j s. t n C irn
[. 0;. de l,,,
9 e n l c n E *31 : n e e. (..
_. ; e, 4 Se, [e f.
I l.' < e e s
- w i l
nA%A[(sg-d 4.g 4 Y l g d rs It n l ( b a b e..
l(\\.P.Onto
- 5. s / l;:, L ; le m L' n y :
- e < v :, e P, e Iv 4 fi In4N,.ri-.
h, I
nco-oe,.,,'c-jime.::,g,en d
(.LJ.ll^~,0 n?) VaneI f1cel, les c<tp t
1 lJf //on,n L r _, ;-,e. - O t.
e l /, e lc.-
c cc
! 3. k e (Ir.,
Im Fn~en C o /. II,.
< 6n 1
l U. R. O nirk / ' r On*,agep-P o, ) u i f
, F.
p' /). n.l,, m V Ca t Ter l n ; v a.I., O t C Cin r
R. l]c o r e,)e no, : x -
l'w :,,ccu Li CD i.
0 f
[li lt y f II.
n s,~
I E fowdet f
o - hu
. J/ t-C (79
(,
ec l{}. C..D k,
,.,1r L Irl VI, n il, L c ), i:.
' /), n. r& lt x,.
na ~ cc
% " - fr A /.., h / n.,,,, / 4 t;.,.%/
e
- b.. l$. J / t. n ~ k.,, h pu. l c. li,,.
p< fle n C/Tu I
-4}l4.,de)
G, I
.P e r I-:., >
r m
eport No h ol _
Rep;pn4/ Repult 4 cope /ModuleFcllom
,, es DOCUMENTS EXAMINED Te I/w N.,
yp TITLE / SUBJECT Da/*
R * *' * "
l 7
r n L I < r-iL -
l 1.,(<,1')- D C C. !L ~
J, /, :,. u n v,...,,,, lu o.J BA /~w d, :
l'. L., < l E l m 4.Ec l L f/:n ( % /,, l,
/t,/7/
c.,
'l l
c,T-T<
- b. u.
C 'R c r,k e Fi ~,
n c. u
.L, n 1 51 A, n k, i L/3 /i i
3 l
t i E - n. D. [: J.,; h r,, : y n 2,.
J _. L _ f) I' d L c A v n,,
t9 iz/stf ? c i
4 l
c i l' Te A. T. ) )
r-.. D r %,
G.L Ont. fq97 ud,t.cn53t; I/t.1/ T t l
C ir - Tc : L. O. h.. n er rm A L: n JJ f_t
,L k_e 3/zl,/Tl r
4 (c
C
- T - Te - D. tl re,-
m r-A f V rk s k L L. Tu n s,% i - J Ta. a;l:. m 'h n bllt.lEl 7
I c i: -re R. V;., a h k r-: 2, k. uM 1,. m !. L; Pnc fl~t]
'l17 / % I S
NT -Ti P. l u k lr, rt ?!.ll s :1e L V FL ~ ~ r I:,,
e T< M S V i c. c c 1, llLVl$L c
e i
- n. Tv tJ 17. 8,,y, j:, a rm v C. Ln.,e L L. ;_, n < c le s.e/ G m l:m h b s. 2-ltsitt 3
1 10 fcLLI %e(__
- ti.iCts.,
~: T;. C g L._- n - n.cc !.. ll ( l c;
L
{i.!
(c L.J ;., + u v e,
3 l.1/ s /
F1 d Y~, L l.. s:. n u e L L I C, ;
C. W L u n o ( p. t. s. : d, r e D.V. 3 ~: n' II 7
t L n in -
+/sh /
12 5
h ;.1) lr. (.. wti L%
r -. /L de,e L,1 E, L 4 nrU ) % :c u fln /7 +
/2 E
G e' c,
.,,-I-u M J/es, L
'c
- f.. /,,
'%/n
- i.,
/-
Document Types:
fiumns.:_
l.
Drawing 5.
Purchase 0rder 1.
$q,.n t m pf'yb~ F' temjy 2.
Speci fica tion 6.
Internal Memo t'.
'UX@~ '
Ty li 4 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter
'n4Itadh(l:IaMc}
f ocfiiftent 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) ev4
l 1\\llll4 ll 3
- n. L l
l c
c y
h y_M3
'b a
u 7
t (1
't t h 1
3 uoI m
nd I
S
(:
'2 nl 4
l-2 3
e 4
f t
to2 R
r s
(
{-
p e"
o 4
n t
~R f
/
r
/
t f'
9 1
i
=
/
f 7
Y 9
i z
7 1
/
/
/
f nl i'
1 i
/
I
/s
/
l7 7
/
/
l 5
i v
1
(
4
/
M
/
t lS
/,
1 z
1 t
t v
L a
h 1
n r lt D
/' l' 7
/
l3 l
/
/
n e
1
/'
I 5
L m
]
}
u /.'.,1 f
l o.1 t h
U 3.
3 n
W T
0 s
tu
)
c I
P l
o c
i
~
7 n
a.
% 4 n
l D
t n
E z
l T
~
l t
1 C
I
)
i
/
~
M E
)
A J
s t.
u J
n
/-i l
l\\
X B
r L
e E
U L
'l-
]
h S
L T
W L
u S
/
P I
T E
L i
v v
r n
u
/
N L
]
J 3
t e
l, l
E T
"7
. k
)
s 1
I m
y f
i L
U T
l 1
9 r
l C
I a
f t
S u
O c
(
i I
P 6
s g,
D c
s e
n.
/
. e, n
R h
t'l e
t
?<
f N.
T n
b
'r u
e r
/
i s
c L
6 l
/
n l
1 e
u
/
u c
J
),
s A
^;
G C
c a,
e f
s w
u(
A 3
(
3 N
C l,
1 9
u e
)
4 9
t,
/
l, 1
~
c u
c t
(
a y
n.
A L
/
C I
ro f
)
f R
e n
S I
x em i
m J
d f
~
~
f de c
c 5
f L
T A
1 l
1, r
rM e
h 7
r
/
i 5
1 v
c 0
p M
1 n
J C
el S
)
c m
V anr
/
sa
(
p l
2 G
n nL
/
3
/
i
(
4 0 hrer 7k
/
7 s
l
. N
(% f
~
d N
r c
c
)
e cet e i
v e
e s
rtth
?
unet R
p o
i a
n c
e n
m t.
I t
i o
PILO s
I
[
l r
7 s
l n
r h
t s
c w
l.
(,
a r
1 l
?
1 c
s 7
c c
'l
?
n
, d
, c 5678 z
/
c.
o i
e
(
l r
~.
T, o
z P.
T< vM%
v.
v m
z r
D k
mV
?
/
1 f
e 1
r s
n e
o
~ '
u, r
i s
t e
e ael M.
g p
cra F
S' E
I I
5 F
F T
3 J
1-1 l
y gi uu c
Ty 3
Tnfd n v
iiea y
/.
t wccM M
naeo 4.
t erprA u
mDSPQ
- p r
d o
u o
o N
7 4
4 c
I 2
3 s
7 Y
t M
4 5
L i
I l
7 o...
7 L
?
2
- )
d d
l
?
l s
c
/
b
' 'c D1234 1
/
/
l e
e p
p s
o I
n c
S I
- nspector U. E. For le n
~ '
BN-Report No. Q-oL icope/Hodule 6 flo w wp e x _ R_tp ow al R e pult DOCUMENTS EXAMINED I/ e r, N.,
Te yp TITLE / SUBJECT DaI*
R * #' * "
l}
l n-is. t. u - Cum I Jc, V7 /; z 10
.3
% 2c Lt-V.
1_
._f a </. L. n ) Ai.
.ty.u 1/: y/ 5 y 4.
/
/
4 f
.1 l 3
f+
ta c c 1.110 c \\ c n Ll, b
.L l,
l_
m.w I(/;L
-,J t
\\
't L S /,f L
'+
o i
.? /
7
/2, f7c37-T<
Jr,, ; [.. !
It/jg/y,
,J j
i l
11 i
ft <! 1 u t - (L a l Tia n
, f.
r)
[L,
- n_
V, c,, e. L.w fll c /5 i rf
.1 u.
?
r2. G,.,.
,c e., n,
ro, r.B.LonN,0:y$:
g,,.a t Llu / rz n
u 1i f*
LL (JlJLLru, iLLrs s)C. t - %.,, I n c L. le l _t - Lt y e r ll7 /f a 3L T ~ - - S 6 L E v ry c :, ~ ~ x tt u s ~ l1 ~ - - h' G (, C 4 r t. (? e. i - _tt7er .I I A1 h
- l ) b w }.a,,
D,; c'l:n is' < , i l.o. JGI-13L?[?.,v Z ]l?Jfst kea. /7 l ?l1 rls t. Rev. 15 'b c /11 j 19 F; 1) b ;. ; <.e,'l;.., L lu -, l: < n 1 u u ny $/LG/p g I IL/9/;~; } +a e n 4! l E,, C l. - a j) )(, ; z.n f., ye, 9 ll 21, -ll1 E/i z / g ? 17 \\ uw l L ~ 7iis~z 7/3 7 / g p cy l vz e /w fj j ibh, ! L 2 s 9 z/t t /f o l 43 9 6 s,: rec,,;s-( L.,. A/.1;s a 4 j i Document Types: plumns.- i I 1. Drawing 5. Purchase 0rder 1. .nt em yb~iT 2. Speci fica tion 6. Internal Memo f ypq'o t' 3. Procedure 7. Letter p. DX ~ f oc-ent( 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) tevP n.4L (pi t al>lc) i i I
PERSONS CONTACH D Ccmpany 4ENERAL ELECTRIC 60. cates 2/22-26/62 D. CHAM 8681.hld Occket/ Report No. M0040 U-0/ Inspector Page h of l ' LAME (Please Print) TI'n_E(Please Drint) ORGANIZATION (Please Drint) l. V. b V-NG(
- 0. 0 NGO M
T K A s h lrc. Ma - o A - 6 E g c WEP'D June acabisee Jopanissa $$o'! nsa U to b h e, Iseu Toa s MED/ps.s& d.L.~Tkowa xx n
- v. Pie,k Anal sO MED n
o 9 G wzen E ' "'~Nic ficH440 GLM A r t' r l} Sensa l'a rl DefZD HN . WAH ER M A4ris SRt=WGR QCn lTY r% f f$ce,yet k Ser-nef 0teWraio S k< CI(CA/WL L I S/E l'N1 6/UG $ /?/VEC SEN D f c7]E W f.Il/ h/d t06 fll L' * $d 4 / c rn s oor =p //// ) st b / kb l h C l' n v w y' C fc a k. } A f ff' f( W/1 L-O '" c'n) /Su p i r le cin a AVC>CE i l l l l l I l l l
n, Scope /Hodule ACT10N 1T6FA DOCllMElil5 EXNilllED T6cHNicAL PU6LicATiDNs 79tJ00403 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 1 3 EoP 30- 10.00 of6RA7 ION ANo rnAINT6 NANCE INSTROC Tios 12Ah l rAANUALS 2-LIST of STANDARD NUCL6AR STEArn SUPPLY SYSTErf) ~ OP6RATloW AND r4AINT6HANc6 INSTRUCTION [PROJ6CT) MANUALS (TY PICA L') 3 6 ENGIN6ERING DocornENTATloN PRACTlc65 -56cTroW cl6A 7/23/8) OPERATION AND rAAINT6N ANc6 1NSTROCTroW rnANUAL PR6PARATl0W 4 8 G EK-73674 6 RAND GULF 1 ofERATIod AND r/lRIMTENAac6 1 /81 INsTRocTuoNS coNrR6L rod ORlllE SYSTGrA [PRELltn\\dARY) fol79 5 8 GEK - 73(o 85 GRAND CULF 1 OP6RATron Ano rAAlnT6NnNc6 IHLTRUCTroNs RERcroR PROTGcTrorJ SYSTErn la S GEK-75577 GRAno GULF ;L2 OP6 RAT 10H AND rAAlHTGHANc6 ll22 INSTRUCTroNS - F06L HANDLING PLATFnRrn 7 ERrn No. ornrn- 0644 04rn rnANunt R61\\6vo 0F GEK-15577 2//b/s2 8 5 GEK-736I) A 50500EHAnan L OPERATION AND rnejaT6nANcf Ys'$" INSTRUCTIONS - RESIDunt. AfAT R6tnotlAL SYSTErn G 8 E Rr/1 No. Drfirl)- 059 7 A ENGla6ERMG REviEva CF 66X-73GilR I l Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequent.f al Item Ntaber 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document l 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document l 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicable) l l
TnspecQor D. CHArnMRLAIN Report flo. gf pj_ Sccpe/Hodule ACTl0N ITErA page 2 of 2. DOCUMEHIS EXAHIllED T6CdNICA L 9V6LICATl0NS 99900403 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 }O E GEY-757)) A - Um&R)CK 1 A2 oP6 Ration AND rnAlNT6 DANCE 8 /81 INSTRUC TIONS-CONTROL R00 DRIVE SYST6rn iI ERTA t40. Dmm-OSM E r4(,N R Rtvi6v) 0F CE K-757II W17/8l 12 3 GEK-950,2A - CunTod L - 096 Ration Ano rMlNTENANCE 2 / 51 INSTROLTroH9 - HIGH PRESSORE cort SPRAY SYSTcrn )3 GLK-13554 A. Kvo sH6ar, IL 2-oraniloa Ano matarsaws 5 / 11 JNST406TroNS - Cor4 TROL R00 r)RIV6 HYDRAUut .SYSTEr/1 14-75 GEK *15112 - LlmERILK 1L2 ofERATICH AND rnAINT6t/ANC6 8 / 80 luSTRUCTiodS - CONTROL RnD DRIVf HTORAULil SYSTirA I5 GEK-75bb3 - CLINTod I 04 rn RfAcTeR CORE ISOLATl0N 7/80 COO LlH(, GYSTErn lb fRrn No: Drafn of 49 REJu6 A of GEK-75663 V3/7/ Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential item Ntaber 2. Spec t fica tion 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Spect fy-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicable [
.M 0 Inspector D. CHArA6ERLSlW Sccpe/ Module ACTION IT6M DOCUMENTS EXNilHED DOC OMENT CONTROL 4 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 I 8 22A7431 - rnAla sT6Arn PIPING AHO EGJIPrnEHT LOADS 12/IS/81 RU.] 2 8 ERrn Hb. Ornn 3474 LASAuf 1 mnsd ST6Arn LIM 65 2l298i A. B. c D STRESS REPopts Ano DESIGN cERTr FtcATIoM 3 S 52hdollAA PIPluG rnAlrJ ST6Arn AHO R6cIRCULATron 12 /17 /81 86V.3 4 DC 22 A$0!I AA DESIGN C6RT. rt)Ala srsArn 4 R6CIRCULATiod,12//d/%I REY. A-PIPING SYST6rA 5 6 onF i 110- B21GooI-HAn enAna sr6Arn PIPING 2/b/8) UERIFICATION STATE rn6NT 4 22A 6970 onelaG rnnsa srEArn. PIPING Ano EconernEar 2/22N2 RE9. I Loans 7 22 A SME D6stGu REPoR T Mala sitAcA IzA'Ari REV 0 8 E 22 h91 A 0 DESIGN REPORT PIPIaG. REclRC 12/s/50 REV.I 9 1 1b9E387 R6 CIRC LocP susPEN5 lou ' SMET 4 7/qi/81 REtl. S Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Ntaber 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If applicable)
Scope /Hodule STA70$ of f86VIDd$ DDCUMEllIS EXAHillED INSP6CTl0N FINDjNGS 9M00403 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 4 1 3 En&)sEERldG 6PERATING PROCEDURE (E0P) 42-5.00 2 /12 /92 ENGIHEERIHG REQUIRE rntHTS DoCurn6HT REL6AS6 2 3 EOP ss-2.00 ' FoRens naoEX - rahT6 RIAL R6G06bT h2l8Z FORrn (60P 42-5.00 & E0P 45-2.00) 3 3 QUALITY CoHTROL ST&H DIMG INSTRucTI0d [QCST) 1.2.18 V2W82 REV. L QUA LITY REQ 0\\RErnEHTS OH TMTERIAL REQUESTS RHD PORCHRS6 ONDERS 4 A rAEnorMNT tsu. 1 To 864 (, of Q CST - 7. 2.18 2/16l62 l l Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential item Ntaber 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Hanual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (If appilcable)
{ a r l e b b a I m c b u t 3 N 1 tt p f 0 4 v mnnp O 4 t eeea 0 8 t mm i uuf 0 ccI l 9 l oo( R 6 ADD e 9 2 1 I 7 i n f 8 7 W 1 tff o g 9 / / / / 3 / a nooi P ? e s 0 5 7 7
- ueei 2/
/ / / / /2 neyae 3 / 1 2 2 s q pt v 5 mSTDR 2 9 S 1 4 u 1 lo.... c_ 2 C1234 a 5 G 4 S t N E E 9 5 u R C IT f o v L I c 7 o s S i L v c C S R 6 I T E 1 G R F U S o P P R a P s /t E N T H A G T O I A S Y L L H L l R A T A T N R U T v E 7 I U S t d f N N E P A V R U A D F T n o n E r r T L S P l l C 0 Y i O H E (, S R L S 2 S T f A J X B & 4 T f T M 9 d R 6 E U l R L u S f b l A B T 8 A S P R 5 / r l P n l E o R 6 r C k i l l L R A I E T f 0 W A E P R D i ) D R o R y M I (A T E H w N r U T I T 5 A A / C a t O )S S 0 9 o s D P T s N 2 6 G d S e H 8 c l U f n D H o S e r I n r r l L 0 O T O 0 R P. C T S r T n o d f C U N T V R f C R F 6 f o ( R A s R T T L C T A y i ro f S P S R I C L H L S S 6 O I E em L E, i N R de c R 6 I N rM e H G S H E O p o i 5 Y 8 W L G l S E D A L sa ( 0 A I T D o A n A 0 T 9 R A anr r I T o C 4 A 0 hrer I P C cet e ) L 4 R 2 6 1 S R rtth E 2 H f K unet S R 5 R A B n PI LO A 0 e D 6 c E T t /r n 0 6 0 7 T A - n A r 2 D R m 0 r 7 P T 6 6 l o E H T o 2 N o n 567D 6 H 5 L 4 C 2 T L L C A t I T n A _ M f o i 0 it s t / e ael T p cra G 2 8 7 8 T E S y gi u u i S Tnfd n A C i i ea P t wccM e H naeo l erprA _ u mDSPQ d u o c H o... I. 2 3 4 T D1234 / 1 e poc S ll!l l l l
Insp:ctor D, CHA tASER L6 W y ll[M/f j,3 4 Scope / Module Ar 710 N lTdrA DOCUMENTS EXAMlllED 90T6NTIAlt.Y REPORTA6L6 CONDITIONS 4 1 2 TITLEjSUBJECT 3 3 609 CS-4.00 POT 6NTIALLY BEPORTABLE CONDITIONS 12As/77 2. 3 GR00P Proc 600RE 10-42 REPORTING OF DEFECTS AND 3/27/til MONCom PLI ANCE UdD6R IO &FR PART 2I OR PART 50.65(e) i Document Types: Columns: 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential Item Number 2. Specification 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Document 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Document 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (if applicable) { l
B-1 Rev. 3-12-73 A..rNDANCE LIST GENERSL EL6cT816 CCCKIT NO. 99900403 c o xP.w y: Dat : 2-2(r 82 7: 33;ecuca c m. c,i m.%,- 33; cuen c;eer,nce (.Messe NA W Ae we 3-*ne) A aase Fr.=t) OP.GANIZ.bCN ?.=t) ~ - ' D. D, char /)66RLhlN I86Ac. tor 6NGINE6R V5 NRC Rt6.11/ p E. G /c u Eh J <Aj :,,, n ( c., ,,,.m j s-- NA E A42CLA Y \\ Ar.orr a n >20 tGE A/c p in / Sm A hun w~w- \\ Ts. Emt \\UAso@flAed I RT t/Alr=m;A. ! Auoit-eccxbetcL Enc >/NEO l' AC 0C[ssGrt l At6L ZeuAt%s 1)tmayg5 l (,~5 /NAS.O VD A f; m eoA I Mc;e, O,9 icc/eus l A. Breecl i Mgr QA i P&GAO l \\(2,4r Sb e 4 0t7/d /'lg:" 3ld b / bl W.G E si We & j \\ v i y. a t f /,. IAMLL?wmu ; /7w>ir c2 og tp i A)C 9 ZE~ 7 D, 6 L 26-I Al&/2. OC-- l A/ED /45 e) 9 io, M L ! M& Neh 9.d s ! M G-9 [ N G.) o eA.CAMCRod i Ma-mvetr cet fe.c. ! Gc/sico l l R V llIa- \\ use. scae. srnavAndrbu c,e /sai o I lJuar ceiance krswson Aus neon ; uro /~no i iu a a _-~ ~ a ~ k {,CNNNihAm WA Wfhsm $*WO juC & ID i j i t ,}}