ML20054E567

Control of Heavy Loads at Nuclear Power Plants,Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2,Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co, Draft

ML20054E567
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	05/31/1982
From:	Stickley T EG&G, INC.
To:	NRC
Shared Package
ML20054E565	List: ML20054E567
References
REF-GTECI-A-36, REF-GTECI-SF, TASK-A-36, TASK-OR NUDOCS 8206110368
Download: ML20054E567 (33)

Text

,

~

o s .

v

\

C0t; TROL OF HEAVY L0A05 AT NUCLEM POWER PLANTS PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY 00cket No. 50-440 & 50-441 Autnor J.'C. Rawers Principal Tecnnical Investigator T. Hi Stickley'

~

EG&G Idano, Inc.

May 1982 e

b e 4

e e

.' 8206110368 820603 PDR ADOCK 05000440 A PDR

~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _,

y .__. -. . . . _ _ . . _.

ABSTRACT  ;'

The Nuclear Regulatory Comission has requested that all nuclear plants either operating or under construction submit a response of ,

compliancy with NUREG-0612, " Control of Heavy Loads at Nuclear Power Pl ants." EG&G Idaho, Inc. has contracted with tne NRC to evaluate the responses of those plants presently under construct ion. This report contains EG&G's evaluation and recomendations for The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2.

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units I and 2 of the Cleveland Electric j Illuminating Company do not totally complf with the guidelines of

! NUREG-0612. In general, compliance is insufficient in 'the following areas:

~

o Several programs needed to address issues raised by the guidelines or demonstrate compliance are only now being written,

$ or will be written.and/or implemented in the future.

i o Insufficient information has been provided for proper assessment of compliance with various aspects of the several guidelines.

'j J

o .Several guidelines were dealt witn 'in a very cursory manner and require a more detailed analysis by the licensee.

)

i The main report contains recomendations which will aid in eringing j the abo've items into compliance'with 'the appropriate guidelines.

~

I l

!d j -

.)" ..

ii

] ,

a -

) ~ - _ .. _ _ . . _ . . _ . . . -- -_

r

, I l

e

.i CONTENTS 1 1

11 A B ST R A CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11 E X E CU T I V E S UM MAR Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1

1. I N TR O DUC T IO N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pu rp o s e o f Rev i ew . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1.1 1.2 Generic Backgrounc ........................................ .

l

^

3 1.3 Pl ant-Specif i c Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,

4

2. EVALUATIO N AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' . . . . . . . . .

4 2.1 Overview .................................................. ,

He avy Lo ad Ov erhead Handling Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 6

2.3 Gen e r a l Gu i d e l i n e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

18 2.4 In teri m P rotecti on Me asures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19

3. . CONCLUDING

SUMMARY

19 3.1 Ap pl icabl e Lo ad Handling Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19 3.2 Guideline Recommendations .................................

21 3.3 In terim R ecommend ations : . . . . . . . . . : -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22

' 4. REF ER E N CE S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TABLES ......................i,..................................

23 5.

. . e 4

S

)

e e 4

i 111

f TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING 03MPANY, PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2

1. INTRODUCTION i

1.1 Purpose of Review -

i This technical evaluation report documents the EG&G Idah'o, Inc, review i

' of general load handling policy and procedures at The Cleveland I

,; , Electric Illuminating Company (CEICo), Perry Nuclear Power Plant

{ (PNPP) Units 1 and 2. The review was performed to assess compliance with the general load handling guidelines of NUREG-0612, " Control of

{

jg Heavy Loads at Nuclear Power Plants" [1], Section 5.1.1.

j 1.2 Generic Background ,

i

'I Generic Technical Activity Task A-36 was established by the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff to systematicallyfexamine certain aspects, particularly loa'd movement and control, of nuclear i

power plant licensing and the adequacy of measures in effect at operating nuclear power plants to' assure the safe handling of heavy loads, and to ' recommend necessary ch'anges to these measures. This h

?- activity was initiated by a letter issued by the NRC staff on May 17, j 1978 [2], to all power reactor licensees, requesting information concerning the control of heavy loads near spent fuel.

The results of Task A-36 were reported in NUREG-0612 " Control of Heavy Loads at Nuclear Power Plants." The staff's conclusion from

l. tnis evaluation was that existing measures to control tne handling of heavy loads at operating plants, although providing protection from' l} certain potential problems,.did not adequately cover the major'causes l

l '~

1. of load nandling accidents and should be upgradea.

}

4.

3 1

1 -

l

'I -

. - - - . , - . _ . z-.

_~ ,

l!

In order to upgrade measures for the control of heavy loads, the staff - - -

}, developed a series of guidelines, based on an accepted approata or

' protection philosophy, designed to acnieve a two-phase objective. The ~

first portion of the objective, achieved through a set of general guidelines identified in NUREG-0612, Article 5.1.1, is to ensure that the design of all load handling systems at nuclea'r power plants is appropriate and adequate for the critical tasks in which they are employed and the systems are operated in such a manner tnat the probability of failure is minimal. The second portion of the staff's

- objective will be achieved through guidelines identified in .

NUREG-0612, Articles 5.1.2 through.5.1.5. .

i The approach used to develop the staff guidelines for minimizing the ,

potential for a load drop was based 6n defense-in-depth and is sunnarized as follows:

o provide sufficient operator training, handling system design, load handling instructions, and equipment inspection to assure reliable operation of tne handling system; o define sc'e load travel paths through procedures and operhtor 4

training so that, to the extent practical, heavy loads are not carried over or near irrddiated fuel or safe shutdown equipment; I '

o provide mechanical stops or electrical interlocks to prevent l

l movement of heavy loads.over irraciated fuel or in proximity to equipment associated with reduncant shutdown paths.

i Staff guidelines resulting from the foregoing are tabulated in i :, Section 5 of NUREG-0612.

l t

4 2

l '

_=

~ -

1.3 Plant-Specific Background .

In Decemoer 22, 1980, the NRC issued a letter (3) to The Cleveland ,,

Electric Illuminating Company, the Licensee for The Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2, requesting that tne Licensee review provisions for nandling and control of neavy loads at Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2, evaluate these provisions with respect to the guidelines of NUREG-0612, and provide certain additional information to be used for an independent determination of conformance '

to these guidelines. On 19 June 1981, The Cleveland Electric Iluminating Company provided its initial response [4] to.this request.

O e

. O 4

e e

G N

e e 3

2. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 Overview Tne following sections summarize The Cleveland Electfic Illuminating Canpany (CEICo) review of heavy load handling at Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 and include EG&G's evaluation, conclusions, and recommendations to the licensee for bringing the facilities into more complete compliance witn tne intent of NUREG-0612. The CEICo review of tne f acilities does not indicate substantial diff erence oetween tne '

two units. While EG&G is willing to agree witn CEICo assumption of i

similar design, it is noted tnat tne two plants are not auplicates or I mirror. images of one another. Therefore, it is oovious tnat on occasion differences do exist and must ce addressea separately. The licensee has inoicated the minimum weight of a heavy load for tnis f acility (as defined in NUREG-0612, Article 1.2) as 1048 los. EG8G wishes to commeno CEICo for tneir subjection of all hoists to tne more rigorous regulations as tnat of cranes.

2.2 Heavy Load Overnead Handling Systems This section reviews the licensee's list of overnead handling systems wnich are subject to the crite,ria of NUREG-0612 and a review of tne justification for excluding overhead handling systems from the above mentioned list.

- 2.2.1 Scoce

" Report the results of your review of plant arrangements to identify all overnead handling systens from whicn a loaa crop may result in camage to any system required for plant shutoown or decay heat removal (taking no credit for any interlocxs, tecnnical specifications, operating procedures, or detaileo structural analysis) and justify tne exclusion of any overneaa handling system from your list by verifying that there is sufficient physical separation from any load-impact point and any safety-relateo component to permit a determination by inspection that no heavy load drop can result-in camage to any system or component required for plant shutoown or decay heat removal."

e e f

4 t

h I

r

• ~

A. Sunnary of Licensee Statements , ,

The hoists and monorails used in the plants are all listed and the crane operations for each are list'ed. Potential hazaros are listed for 01ch load handling operation. The method of evaluating each hazard elimination is also provided.

B. EGLG Evaluation .

EGLG has determined that CEICo's response to crane identification is well documented. The tables provided for the various lif ting devices and crane handling operations are very complete. However, the drawing indicates tnat a notable amount of heavy load handling is accomplished by dollies and not by cranes. CEICo should state if cranes are employed to lift the loads onto or off of the dollies, and if the cranes are employed as mechanical mules to move tne

~

loaded dollies.

In addition, EG&G requests that the maximum load capacity of each crane be stated. ,

~

EG&G is in agreement with the logic chart used as a basis for evaluation and analysis of the movement of heavy loads, and commends CEICo's method of clear presentation.

C. EG&G Conclusion and Reconmendations EGLG concludes that CEICo has identified all cranes which are covered by NUREG-0612.

EG&G recommends that CEICO supply as further information:

e e 5

.r , ? ,

j 1

o load capacity of each crane addressed in the response.

o The use of or, interaction of overhead cranes with the -

movement of heavy loads by dollies.

2.3 General Guidelines This section addresses the extent to which tne applicable handling systems comply with the general guidelines of NUREG-0612

- Article 5.1.1. EG&G's conclusions and recommendations are provided in summaries for each guideline. -

The NRC has established seven general guidelines which must be met in ,

. order to provide the defense-in-depth approach for the handling of heavy loads. These guidelines concern the following criteria from Section 5.1.1 of NUREG-0612:

A. Guideline 1--Safe Load Paths B. Guideline 2--Loed Handling Procedures C. Guideline 3--Crane Operator Training D. Guideline 4--Special Lifting Devices E. Guideline 5--Lif ting Devices (not specially designed)

F. Guideline 6--Cranes (Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance)

G. Guideline 7--Crane Oesign.

These seven guidelines snould be satisfied for all overhead handling

[

systems and programs in order to permit handling heavy loads in the l vicinity of the reactor vessel, near spent fuel- in the spent fuel e .

I 6

9

. . =

.s 9 i

pool, or in other areas where a load drop could damage saf e shutoown , ,

systems. The succeeding paragraphs address the guidelines individually.

2.3.1 Safe Load Paths [ Guideline 1, NUREG-0612, Article 5.1.1]

" Safe load paths should be defined for the movement of heavy loads to minimize the potential for heavy loads, if dropped, to impact irradiated fuel in the reactor vessel and in the spent fuel pool, or to impact safe shutdown equipment. The path snoulo follow, to tne extent practical, structural floor members, ceams, etc., such that if the load is dropped, the structure is more likely to withstand the impact. These load paths should oe

~

defined in procedures, shown on equipment layout drawings, '1d clearly marked on the floor in the area where the load is to be hancied. Deviations from defined load paths should require -

- written alternative procedures approved by the plant safety

review committee."

A. Summary of Licensee Statements

' 'Information packets have been assembled for each elevation

', or section of the plant. The packets consist of general

arrangement drawings that show:

(1) location of equipment necessary for safe shutoown and continued decay heat removal with the respective j

emergency power division.

(2) Coverage areas for the lifting devices.

(3) Individual transport paths, both as elevatio'n lifts and i

4 along the floor via dollies.

l>

To f acilitate the use of the arrangement drawings, a key .

correlating equipment tag number with the equipment name has ceen included...'

' ... A separate table is presented for each lifting device;

'} the table includes the impact area, the load or load lif t by f" the device, safety-related equipment that could be damaged by a load drop, floor. elevation, and the category for hazard elimination. The categories for hazard elimination are as l - follows:

A. ...

B. ... .

(CEICo Responses Pages 1 and 3).

i l . *.

I f

7 d -

~'

o e B. EG&G Evaluation  ;

EG&G finds CEICo ioentification of the various load paths to be very detailed and well presented. Included drawingsare very informative and most of the hazard elimination categories are self explanatory and readily acceptable.

However, NUREG-0612 requires 'These load paths should be defined in procedures, shown on equipment layout drawings,

~

. and clearly marked on the floor in the area where the load .

is to be handled.' In the response by'CEICo, no mention is a

made of delineating the safe load handling paths. .

. Also, several of the hazard elimination categories required .

CEICo to perform sane sort of analysis or juogement, the basis of which was not included in the licensee report. For example:

D. ' Likelihood of. handling system failure for this load is extremely small.

E. Analysis demonstrates that crane failure and load drop will' not damage safety-related equipment.' -

(CEICo reference page 3)

EG&G has no criticism of CEICo evaluation of each load handling operation. However, EG&G has not been given the information to properly assess the criteria usec by CEICo for hazard elimination. Therefore, EG&G suggests that each

- hazard elimination evaluation be maintained on file and be available for review.

EG&G also notes that CEICo does not mention or address the subject of alternative load paths.

9 e e 8

+ . - -

~~. .

. . y -.* -

C. EG&G Conclusions and Recommendations EG&G concludes that CEICo is in partial compliance withthe intent of NUREG-0612 Section 5.1.l(1).

As part of the moninal compliance requirements, EG&G recommends:

(1) a suitable technique ce devis,ed by which the safe load .

handling paths can be delineated. -

(ii) the analysis and criteria used for hazard elimination be kept available for review.

(iii) the suDject of alternative load paths be addressed.

2.3.2 Load Handling Procedures (Guideline 2, NUREG-0612, Article 5.1. l( 2)]

" Procedures should be developed to cover load handling operations for heavy loads that are or could De handled over or in proximity to irradiated fuel or safe shutdown equipment. At a minimum

- procedures should cover handling of-tnose loads listed in Taole 3-1 of NUREG-0612. These procedures snould include: identification of required equipment; inspections and acceptance criteria required before movement of load; tne steps and proper sequence to be followed in handling the load; defining the safe path; and other'special precautions."

A. Summary of Licensee Statements

'The inspection and preventive maintenance instructions for all of the overhead cranes are oeing written...'

' An Overhead Crane Operation qualification guide is being written... The following general guidelines from NUREG-0612 are listed in the qualification guide:

a. ...

b. Procedures for Handling of Heavy Loads.' , ,

e e 9

o

} '

' Operator qualification will require familiarity with tne PNPP Equipment Removal Scheme and special handling / safe load .

paths procedures...'

'To ensure that safe load paths are followed, crane -

operators and maintenance personnel involved in supervising load handling will be f amiliar with all requirements prior to lifts. Information will be presented through in-site i

training and will be referenced in maintenance instructions 1 and procedures.' .

$, (CEICo Response pages 4 and 5)

(

i, B. EG&G Evaluation -

$ EG&G has determined that CEICo did not address the subject of load handling procedures directly. However, CEICo did l

allude to the subject at several points.

The heavy load handling procedures referred to by CEICo are apparently not currently written but 'are being written.'

i; 1

EG&G believes the p'roposed-Load Handling Procedures Program which is being initiated by CEICo is a good program.

However, the documentation has to be. written, submitted for review, and implemented before the guiueline can be t

completely satisfied.

EG&G was not provided with a copy of 'PNPP Equipment Removal f Scheme and Special Handling / Safe Load Path Procedures.'

EG&G suggest that the procedure be submitted for review.

i i 1

l EG&G finds several CEICo statements on the prepared load l 2

handling policy by CEICo to be very commendable especially:

'Infonnation will be presented through on-site training...' '

i i i  :

C. EG&G Conclusion and Recommendations l 3 l  :

2 EG&G concludes that CEICo is in minimal compliance witn the l l intent of NUREG-0612 Section 5.1.l(2). ..

\

i! 10 l  :

i;

[

n n _,, _

However, the proposed program should be written up and . .

placed on file for review and audit by the NRC before NUREG-0612 guidelines can De satisfied. ,,

2.3.3 Crane Operator Training (Guideline 3, NUREG-0612, Article 5.1.l(3)]

" Crane operators should be trained, qualified and conouct themselves in accordance with Chapter 2-3 of ANSI B30.2-1976,

'OverheadandGantryCranes'(5]." _

A. Sunnary of Licensee Statemen'ts ".

'An Overhead Crane Operator qualifications guide is being written. This guide will follow the requirements of ANSI B30.2-1976 for qualifications of operators and will contain reference to NUREG-0612 for operation of the Polar, Fuel Handling and ESW cranes. The following general guidelines from NUREG-0612 are listed in the qualification guides:

' Operator qualification will require f amiliarity with the .

PNPP Equipment Removal Seneme and special handling safe load path procedures. Knowledge will be checked by interview, written exam and a practical demonstration. Completion of these requirements will be documented on a qualification card which will be retained in the operators' training file.'

- (CEICo response page.4 and 5) .

J B. EG&G Evaluation l

- .EG&G has determined that the program proposed by CEICo is l

very commendable.

l C. EG&G Conclusion and Recommendations

.EG&G concluoes that CEICo is in compliance with the intent f

of NUREG-0612 Section 5.1.1(3).

s.

l 11 i

l __

-- a

l i

l

. 'l ,

2.3.4 Special Lifting Devices [ Guideline 4, NUREG-0612, _

' ~

Article 5.1.l(4)]

"Special lif ting devices should satisfy the guidelines of Adl N14.6-1978, ' Standard for Special Lif ting Devices for Shipping Containers Wei Materials' [6]ghing 10,000 This Pounds standard (4500 should kg)toor apply allMore special for Nuclear i lifting devices which carry heavy loads in areas as defined above. For operating plants certain inspections and load tests may be accepted in lieu of certain material requirements in the i

standard. In addition, the stress design factor stated in Section 3.2.1.1 of ANSI N144 should be based on the combined '

. maximum static and dynamic loads that could be imparted on the handling device based on characteristics of the cr-ane which will be used. This is in lieu of the guideline in Section 3.2.1.1 of ANSI N14.6 which bases the stress design f actor on only the weight (static load) or' the load and of the intervening components of the special handling device." .

A. Sumary of Licensee Statements

'An Overhead Crane Operator qualification guido is being

. written... The following general guicelines from NUREG-0612 are listed in the qualification guides:

4. ...

D. ...

c. ... . -

d. ANSI N14.6-19/8 for Special Lifting Devices.'

(CEICo Response page 4)

' B. EG&G Evaluation EG&G has determined that CEICo does not properly address the I NUREG-0612 guideline concerns with special lifting devices. f

$G&G particularly notes that NUREG-0612 requires that the stress design factor now be based on the combined maximum static and dynamic loads. CEICo did not address this subject analysis in their response.

12

EG&G also wishes to point out that the NRC believes that . ,

special lif ting devices and their associated problems are sufficiently important that CEICo should devote a special written section to their compliance with the guidelines concerning these devices.

EG&G also wishes to mention that the proposed write-up should address the change to 10 CFR Part 100. Section 2.1 of NUREG-0612 specifies the allowable offsite radioactive '

release applicaole to heavy loads is 25r. of the guideline exposures outlined in 10 CFR Part 100. -

C. EG&G Conclusion and Recommendations EG&G concludes that CEICo is not in compliance with the intent of NUREG-0612 Section 5.1.1(4). .

' N As part of the nominal compliace requirements, EG&G recommends that all the information on special lifting devices be written into a single section, and it be resubmitted for review and approved.

Part of tne write-up should address the maximum static and dynamic load stresses of each special load devices, their summed values, and the compared result with tne calculated j

- .and tested load strength of the heavy loading system using that special lif ting device.

2.3.5 Lif ting Devices (Not Specially Designed) [ Guideline 5, NUREG-0612, Article 5.1.l(5)]

"Lif ting devices that are not specially designed should be installed and used in accordance with the guidelines of ANSI B30.9-1971, ' Slings' [7]. However, in selecting the proper sling, the load used should be the sum of the static and maximum dynamic load. . The rating identified on the sling should be in terms of the ' static load' which produces the maximum static and 13

Where this restricts slings to use on only certain dynamic load. cranes, the slings should be clearly marked as to the cranes which they may be used."

A. Summary of Licensee Statements

'Lif ting devices and loads that have the potential to cause fuel damage, a criticality accident or loss of safe shutdown capaDility are separately identified in the summary portion of this report.'

' An Overhead Crane Operator qualification guide is bein written... -

are listed in the qualification guides: .

a. ... .

b. ...

c. ...

d. ...

e. ANSI B30.9 for Slings and Other Lif ting Devices.

f. ...,

(CEICo Response page 4)

B. EG&G Evaluation _ .

i EG&G has determined that CEICo does not properly address the .

NOREG-0612 guideline concerned with lif ting devices.

EG&G particularly notes that NUREG-0612 r1 quires that the stress design f actor now be based on tha combined maximum CEICo did nqi address this static and dynamic loads.

subject analysis in their response. _

EG&G also is concerned with the ' summary portion of this In Section 1.6, 'The report' (CEICo Response Page 6).

movement... must be controlled by administrative This procedure has not been outlined, procedures.'

referenced or explained and therefore the proceau,re cannot 14

(

be reviewed and analyzed. Sindlarly, in Section 2.a & b, , ,

' Analysis is yet to be completed...' therefore the analysis can not be reviewed. _

As with the special lif ting devices in the previous section, NRC believes lifting devices and their associated problems are sufficiently important that CEICo should devote a special written se'. tion to their compliance with guidelines concerning these devices. "

~

EG&G also believes that each sling should be preperly identified as to its lifting capacity, applicability to specific load handling oper,ations, and, if appropriate, restriction of its use to specific cranes they are.

C.. EG&G Conclusion and Recommendations EG&G concludes that CEICo is not in compliance with the intent of NUREG-0612 Section 5.1.l(5).

As part of the nominal complinace requirements, EG&G recommends that all the information on lifting devices be written into a single section and it be resubmitted for review and approval of the NRC. This write-up should include both the maximum static and . dynamic load stress of each loading device' compared with the calculated and tested load strength. In addition, any load limitation, specific crane usage, etc., should be properly assessed for each

' sling and each sling so identified.

2.3.6 Cranes (Inspection, Testing, and Ms ntenance) [ Guideline 6, i

NUREG-0612, Article 5.1.l(6)]

"The crane should be inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with Chapter 2-2 of ANSI 830.2-1976, ' Overhead and

' Gantry Cranes,with the exceptjon that tests and inspections 15 1'

n . . .

~

should be performed prior to'use where it is not practical to .

meet the frequencies of ANSI B30.2 for periodic inspection and .

test, or where frequency of crane use is less than the containment may only be used every 12 to 18 months during refueling operations, and is generally not accessible during power operation.

ANSI B30.2, however, calls for certain For such cranes inspections to be performed daily or' monthly.

having limited usage, the inspections, test, and maintenance should be performed prior to their use)."

A. Summary of Licensee Statements

'The inspection and preventative maintenance instructions for all of the overhead cranes are being written under the 830.2-1976 and the vendor serv' ice guidelines of ANSIFor those cases where requirements differ, the manuals.

more stringent is being applied.'

'An Overhead Crane Operator qualification guide is being written...

The following general guidelines from NUREG-0612 are listed in the qualification guides:

a.

b. .

c.

d.

- j e.

Crane Inspection and Testing in accordance with ANSI f

f. ,

830.2-1976.'

l (CEICo response page 4) .

i i

B. EG&G Evaluation ,

EGLG wishes to remind CEICo that specific plant operation  ;

For situations may require alterations to ANSI B30.2-1976. I example, NUREG-0612 Section 5.1.l(6) points out that -4 Therefore, periodic inspections may not always be possible.

alternate proposals are required. However, all changes and  ;

new proposals must be submitted for review and approval.

• Rewrite must be accepted before compliance can be granted. i I

16

]

mn- -

~*

C. EG&G Conclusion and Recommendations EG&G concludes that CEICo is in partial compliance with the intent of NUREG-0612 Section 5.1.l(6).

As part of the nominal compliance requirements, EG&G recommends that the proposed crane inspection, testing, and maintenance program be written and submitted for approval before compliance can be granted. Any variances from the existing, referred to, guidelines must be specifically addressed.

2.3.7 Crane Design [ Guideline 7, NUREG-0612, Article 5.1.l(7)]

"The crane should be designed to meet the applicaole criteria are?

guidelines of Chapter 2-1 of ANSI B30.2-1976, 'Overnead and Gantry Cranes,' and of CMAA-70, ' Specifications for Electric Overhead Traveling Cranes' [8). An alternative to a ##

specification in ANSI 830.2 or CMAA-70 may be accepted in lieu.c?

specific compliance if the intent of the specification is -

satisfied."

A. Sunnary of Licensee Statements

'All cranes identified in this report that handle loads in safety-related buildings are designed to CMAA Specification 70 and ANSI B30.2-1976.'

~

(CEICo response pag'e 5)

8. EG&G Evaluation However, EGLG believes the statement above to be valid.

there was insufficient information provided by CEICo for proper assessment. EG&G believes that manufacturer nama, crane model, and purcnase data would provide tae minimu::

information necessary to judge the crane design.

M e e 17 M

~

C. EG&G Conclusion and Recommendations EG&G concludes tnat CEICo has provided insufficient information by whicn tne ef t- 17: intent of NUREG-0612 ,

Section 5.1.l(7) can be judged.

/

EG&G recommenos tnat additional information on eacn crane ce provioed.

2.4 Interim Protection Measures -

The NRC staff nas estaolished (NUREG-0612, Article 5.3) that six measures should be initiated to provide reasonaole assurance that *

! handling of heavy loads will be performed in a safe manner until final implementation of the general guidelines of NUREG-0612, Article 5.1 is complete. Four of these six interim measures consist of gene'ral

.' Guideline 1, Saf e Load Paths; Guideline 2, Load Handling Procedures; Guideline 3. Crane Operator Training; and Guideline 6, Cranes (Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance). The two remaining interim measures cover the following ' criteria: .

o Heavy load technical specifications o Special review for heavy' loads hancied over the core.

i EG&G recommenos that because CEICo Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units 1

'and 2 are not yet operationaT, and will not be operational for quite some time, it is more appropriate that the time De spent bringing the plant into compliance with the guidelines in NUREG-0612 Article 5.1 than the time De spent aadressing interim measures. Proper compliance with tnese guidelines negates the necessity of Interim Protection l

Measures.

l l

t

' ~

.Wl%

l r

CEICo should either address the section on Interim Protection Measures .

or give a statement of assurance that the plants will be brought into compliance before, say plant fueling, without the need of the Ititarim Protection Measures.

e O

e 9

I e

9 5

e b

i l ; .

( .1, 4

a e e 99 6

19 i

l D

~

~

. o . .

l , ,

o

3. CONCLUDING SUMMMY 3.1 Aoolicaole load Handling Systems

~

l The list of cranes and hoists supplied by the Licensee as ceing subject to the provisions of NUREG-0612 is procaoly acequate (see Section2.2.1). However. EG&G does recommend that more information be

• provided; for example, load capactty of each crane, and the interaction of Overnead Crane Operations with dolly movement of heavy loaos. ( Also see Guideline 7 below.) ,

3.2 Guideline Recommendations S

, Compliance with the seven NRC guidelines for heavy load handling (Section 2.3) is partially satisfied at Perry Nuclear Power Plant Conclusions are 4 mapresentea in tabular form (PNPP) Units 1 and 2.

in Table 3.1. Guideline recomendations are meant to serve as a partial list of deficiencies which CEICo must satisfy. The enanges, the modifications, and the proposed write-ups and programs are to De suomitted ano approved of the NRC and are to be maintained on file for subsequent audit before PNPP Units 1 and 2 can ce consiaered to oe in compliance with NUREG-0612. Complete compliance must be obtained on I all sections of NUREG-0612 before the plant can begins fueling.

Several of the principal recomendations which will aio in bringing the plant into nominal compliance with the intent of these guidelines are provided is follows:

~!

Guideline Recommendation i

(a) Devise a metboa of delineating i

). (Section 2.3.1) '

Safe Load patns safe load handling paths l

(b) Analyze.and justify alternate  ;

load paths o

20 '

1

. g

.1

. , -m

. . 0 e .t Guideline Recommendation (c) Maintain analysis and criterie l

used for hazard elimination available for review.

Procedures should be written and

2. (Section 2.3.2)

Load Handling Procedures submitted for review as soon as possible. ,

~

No recommendation.

l 3. (Section 2.3.3)

Crane Operator _ .

, Qualifications

4. Sufficient attention has not been (Section2.3.4)

Special Lifting Devices given to special -m e<,

lifting devices; for example the4r was no mention of dynamic loading considerations.

Sufficient attention has not been

5. (Section 2.3.5) i Lifting Devices given to lifting devices, for ,

exampletdr*wasnomentionof , ,

dynamic loading considera'tions.

I Crane inspection, testing, and

6. (Section 2.3.6) ,

maintenance program should be

~

Cranes written with spccial attention to the specification of ANSI B30.2-1975 and the limitations placed on the program by the plant operating conditions.

Addition information on each crane

~'

7. (Section 2.3.7)

Crane Design is required. .

4 e o e

4 4 21 3 - - _ _._-4 . __ ,.wc ,_ . __, _ - , y __ g

.  ?,

3.3 Interim Measures . .

A policy statement should be made (Section2.4) concerning CEICo's attitude toward's the subject.

m 6

i t

I

+

4 s

a l

i n

o b

i 4

m N

i . .

22

) --

6 I

4. REFERENCES

l. NUREG-0612 Control of Heavy Loads at Nuclear Power Plants NRC

2. V. Stello, Jr. (NRC)

Letter to all licensees.

Subject:

Request for #'.tional Information

- on Control of Heavy Loads Near Spent Fuel .

NRC, 17 May 1978 .

3. USNRC

. Letter to CEICo.

Subject:

NRC P.equest for Adc '4Nial Information on Control of Heavy Loads Near Spent Fuel NRC, 22 Decemoer 1980

4. Letter to NRC.

Subject:

Control of Heavy Loa S;: s.cy From Dalwyn R. Davidson, Vice, President, The Ci e'1f' and Electric Illuminating Company to Darrell G. Eisenhunt, C-TN0 tor, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,19 June 1981. ,

S. ANSI 830.2-1976

" Overhead and Gantry Cranes"

6. ANSI N14.6-1978

" Standard for Lifting Devices for Shipping Con:::' 'crs Weighing 10,000 Pounds (4500 kg) or More for Nuclear Ma:Le- 4) 3 4

7. ANSI 830.9-1971

" Slings"

8. CMAA-70

" Specifications for Electric Overhead Traveling: ;y aaes" M

e e 23 ,

. I :.J . . . ..;iyk.us 4.sh s . . a : . . ..+ . - w - ... . . .

. L .>. ; , '.' e:i n. J) .d.) f a:M* .;&. . Du-Liiky;4.sh.raksa. .' . . . . . . . ' .

IAutE ).l. COMPLIANCE SIA!US OF CLEVELAful ELECIRlC lLLIMINAllMG COMPANT. PERRY NUCLEAR POW [R PLAlli UNil5 l AND 2

~

Welept Guideline 5 Guldeline f Guideline J Goldeline I Guideline 2 Guideline 3 Guideline 4 or Crane Operator Special Lif ting Crane . lest Capacity Safa Load Devices Slings anal Inspectin. Crane lh step Lquipment Paths Procedures Iralning

__th?s igeiat icni _

ideavy inads {lbs)

P 1 ,

(l) I .- -- -. .- --

sec .. -- -

Ibilst 31-8 --

P C llc 31-2 l 16,000 1 and

.. P I (2) l .. .. .. ..

shilst 341 ..

and 34 2 10,000 i P C IIC NC .-

til A8-2 ilatces Covers Iti-Ad-3 281-AG-2 218-AG-3

.. P 1 (3) l .. .. .. ..

skilst 3s-1 ..

and J5-2 C IIC E -- ..

iti- All-1 Blatch Removal & liigh 28,000 i P .

2H-AB 7 Pressure Core Spray l

-e l

.. P l f, (4) .

ikanst 42-A. ..  ! ..

IB ..

C NC NC i I P ,

CHu Halntenance Coul iweent (b) .. .. .. P l skilst u .. l ..

IIC NC .. ..

CMD and Cask itemoval 6,000 i P C i

(6) .. .. .. p i ,

Ikalst 44 ,

.. l .- ..

E NC -- ..

I P C 2eactor llecirculattou f>0.UuG Ping llomsvaI

. 3

' e o

• 6 6

m

. - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _

- . 4 v. . . ..

. . . . . . . . . . u.4.

e*

IAutE 3.l. (continued) tielglit Guideline 4 Guideline 5 Goldeline 6 Galdeline 7 or Guideline I Guideline 2 Guldeline 3 Crane - lest Capacity Safe toad Crane Operator Special Lifting and Inspection Crane Design (quipment training Devices Slings Heavy toads (Ibs) Paths Procedures Designation .

(1) . I ikilst 45-1 - -- -- -- -- -- P 45-2 -- 1 P C leC E -- --

Heactor Recirculation 66.000 1 Pimap Ntor (8) lloist 4% l .. .. .. P I gg.2 .. 1 IIC let -- --

P C Drywell Personnel 6.000 1 Luck Equipment

('))

tiulst 50-1 '

-- -- -- P I

, 91 2 -- I -- . --

leC let -- --

C (00 Alternate fleseval l I P l leirough Personnel llatch b -

(10) lluist 51-1 -- -- -- P I 52-2 -- I -- , . --

plc -- --

LRD and Cask 6.000 l P C leC Removal to Drywell e (ll) -. -. .. .. p g thilst 58 .- 1 -.

C leC NC -- ..

Nclear Closed 6.385 I P Cooling Pump i (12) .. .. .. p g Iknist 59 * -- I .. ..

%eclear Closed 6.385 i P C NC feC Cooling Pump i'

t 1

x . '. .'

e e f

• e e

e e e t

~ & -

. a. . e.

9

5 b

%6 o >

80

@ e -.

$f ed E >=

V2 .

• %%C 4 C ==

== g

'3

%g %6

• 4 D

9 #

= @

• lW  : W lW W W lW :W T,, -

== W

. 3 49 g .t-

• en

$ me tA C=G

== J W l '#  : W lW !W lW lW lW 4.; .

- d-3%

b O

m es 4@

Wb =

.C % *=

.u .u .u 5_C

.u . u . . u Io2

- C *=

• g dbu N

to am *) . . .

. b . .b .&

g fs . b . b . b

- b d .b. i T e

@g C

am

.C ==

d .e. . . . . me

, = =

. me i em . a.m ggg . am. . em

=T g *

3 .

m Q en ma @ a-r z == m e C5 b U te M e * * * *

==a ggm e e N @

@ M N O T

$ "e .- N == == ==

3 g == eo == e.s gg me me me g , N. *=

O e **

g e Wb s we b h .O

%3 3>

3h ( 3

• • ** 9 in ub tl4 ,

g O 9&

• • . y b P O 3 be

& A b b ..

g 9 ss .C w @

== = me 3

U@ W -8 3b 5_ 5_

f C . 3 . . g O

. 3 0 . e.m . 2 ..aC.d 4.3 3 .E

=ad . 2W . h C

3 W

• I

-3. J N - N, .-N. =e N.

.=

=, . 7 h

==P=.

e

@T

"* @ 3O

. g c = b m MM mm mM =* *v m

"b

@ 3se as w *- =.C==.= es ee me4 as me 8'*t2 8"n tR gp am.we.a de a.m g go g men e'e g.

g me @ em @ eD E4 *=

4, W**

$ = $Q Q

39 g W 2_ h* *j "

$ . ).

• "E -"$ "

e. .m ) -b. _ .

Y e

W

f*

IAutt 3.1. (continued) .

Weight Guldeline 5 Guideline 6 Guideline 1 Guldeline 3 Guldeline 4 or Guideline 1 Guideline 2 Crane operator Special Lifting Crane - Test Capacity Safe toad bevices Stings and Inspection Crane Deslen Equipment Paths Procedures Training Desiqqation Heavy loads (Ibs)__ .

(20) P l luist 41-1 I - -- -- -- .- --

4g.g --

P C NC NC --

Hatch Cover Removal  ! I for Fuel Transfer Tube s i -

2 I #*

-- P

) (21) I -- -- -- --

! Holst 54-IA --

1,500 i P C NC NC j 54-10 7000 kW Diesel j 54-2A Generator

54-20 (22) -- -- -- P I 1

^

Holst 54-1C --

54-10 r 54-2C NC NC --

54 2P 1000 kW Ulesel 1,500 i P C Generator b *

(23)

Hulst 55-1A ,

--- -- -- P I 55-2A -- I -- --

NC NC -- --

39,000 I P C 1000 kW Diesel a Generator Rutos

(24)

Ibist 55-18 -- -- -- P I 55-28 -- I --

NC NC -- -- i 1000 kW Diesel 39,000 i P C i Generator kotor .

, s (25)

-- -- -- P I Holst 56-1A -- I -- --

56-18 56-2A C NC NC .. ..

56-28 2600 kW Diesel 2,000 I P j

Generator l 3 I I

F $

. p.

. S 6 -

g

?

i*

e n

g 1 ,

s.

e ise - - - -

n - - l - I - l S i D 1 - I - I -

le e n

. O a

dlu G C r

n 3 t o 6si et el c - - -

n i - p e - -

P - P - P -

l s P - P -

- een d nI a

lurd GC n a 5

e n s C .C g - C - N i

C C - C - N - N l a N N - N e l d i l S y u

G 4

- g a -

4f t

ef s I nie - C - C N i Lc - 4C - C - N - N l i - C N

- el v - N 1

- dae iiD

- uc

- Ge p

- S r

o .

~ 3t ag ern - - -

'- nei - - - - C - C ipn -

- C C - C lOi C e a d er f nT ua Gr C

2 s

e e -

- a r - -

l u - - - - P - P l

e d

e P - P P , P

- d c i o u r ,

G P ,

- 1 .

d ea -

- nos - - -

- I iLh - - I - I - 1 l t - i eea - 1

-- dfP

- ia uS G

u

- y 0 0 0 H _

0 (

_ - t s

t h

grcs t

i) 0 0

5

- 0 0

0 0

0, 3

0 5,

4 5,

4 0,

1 r

ioab 9 0 I e pl a( 1 1 2 1 I

~- W 1 1 I -

C r

_ e t

l e

h e c c l i p n t al f i a

- ral Ca e eP n s r el l v k e -

d l o t ru i k

a at t n ~

- a 1 r t n t t e o

et so 6 e ce ne nl l a

~~ L y .i eR f i l l ets i p i

il h

a H

- ll Et

- v Dr o oa n irP irt y r ~

a orl &e At Ar

) le Wt Pea m e e e "

- k a nv hp .t t l l r cl

.l t e

u 0e li o emn t u - G.

t

- G. l i - a ^

Dt h p

i n 0n

- t> e

- 2G

- FlueR e - lag l[

i

- - Uf t

n

, o c

( AuA0 C0C0 1A+li o 1122 t o nt l2

-ll22 - - - - - - -

5555 i o et m

- - ) 3 S555 6666 6666 Mt pna

l. 77 5 5$ 6 t A

- , ) i g t t )

. t t t

)s )s isil2-

)s

(

m ui qs

( e

)s 6i

) s 7i 8i 2b 9i 2 u 0i 3u (l

13ho6 (tt6 A D 2 o 2u (l (I (l l

.. I (ll w

u.

e.

A b

= a e

& ed e

-5 6 - e.

e e

e e .- e e

- e e

- e e

e s

y y

• 3 C

= a'e J

as I

w8- 4 W ed I"Y ae E

== e & 8 e

c. e e

A e e

a. e e

1 e e

& s e

A e e

@ OC MC-

== 9 3b7 63 W C at en W

C e9

== FT 5 :W lW W W -- lW M lW 4 -

m .

-3 F .

C ar ==

• me

@h e@

C == W as u 4.; lW lW lW ;W lW !W lW

--8 e at b

C m =*

4 (=

• W em C W **

==C &C e* e e e e e e a-m Q === 0 Q eQ eQ eQ sQ eQ eQ W 9 9 Db

• Cp

• g i36 w

e

• N

• e W G C 6

.u- 3 so t e e e e e e .e W e 4. e& G & Ob e& eA eb w

• = Q i 3 2

==

3 j e "e s

C O en

== w &.

t

-ee.

1 h On e

e- .e e

e e --

e e-e e-e e -.

== g 1

J" W1

'- = .

s m

a M

e..*

.e.s .

ao b w e 5 5-

-om C M

M M

@- C D C.=.=.

e. M /t 3.Q 8

== == == == e. eg L es m

! 4e e we

+ e - g

• "*+ g == h h - 63 i

l 4 h 2 =e e me

- w = C erb

.Cd *8 9 == == @ C e ED E D G >

e h 4 84 5 -&

D &C @ & *g

=C -&

i g b O C t *3 c

y -

a T

j ad ==

M ed 4

6 &

b 4 9

. 9 E

o ao u o o e,, --

g =g-C D e-y

@ ==

A == ee ?

a.

w

== a g in e- e 3 e == as e-g e as y e 2 l ,* =* . e E == e "1 ew eE> eE> eEw e6

. I -

w en b $_.

. C .et. . e e N N e e .-

.ec N em re c. 5e 9

]C

-v e .e*

N  % NN  %% e jC g

w 3=

yw.e e=cQ(es N

a.we m

me a we as

=w me

.= e g-ma

= we me m5 e A

g, 6 N-m e er -

• M si -

m _y m

3 $ ..==

5 g

- .y 09 -w M 2 2

y.. - h )_

~ ~

f

\

t I ABl[ 3.1. (continued)

Weight Guideline 4 Guideline 5 Guideline 6 Guideline 1 or Guideline 1 Guideline 2 Guideline 3 '

Crane - 1est Capacity Safe toad Crane Operator Special Lif ting anal Inspection Crane Design a fquip.nent 1 raining Devices $11ags Paths Procedures __

Destynation__ licavy toads (Ibs L

.-- -- P i (39) I -- -- -

Reactor --

P C K MC --

llullding lirywell llead 130.000 1 C K NC '

Vessel lleaal I. 310 I P K NC -- --

Crane I P C --

thermal Installatinn 10.000 C NC NC --

RPV llea.l & 0-Ring 236.000 i P NC NC -- --

g I P C Dryer Separator 8.0f 4 .

Strong llack P C NC NC --

4 .

Steam t ryer & 114.600 1 Strong Back P C NC NC --

Separator & 16.000 1 Strong Back C NC IIC --

l Refueling Chute 36.000 i P NC let -- --

I P C I tiefueling Gates I.100 C = Licensee action compiles with setstEG-0612 Guideline. ,

FL = Licensee action does not comply with NUlilG-0612 Guideline.

P

= Licensee has proposed a program which when completed will be in compilance with IIUREG-0612 yeldelines, it = Licensee has proposed' revisions / modifications designed to comply with NUREG-0612 Guideline.

I = Igsulficient luformation provided by the Licensee /or the proposed progree is only in partial compliance ulth histEG a

i 4

e

' f

\ e i

e

• 6 4 .

i

. E d e. Se e ., eI