ML20054D923

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 820126-29
ML20054D923
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 02/23/1982
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20054D903 List:
References
50-259-82-04, 50-259-82-4, 50-296-82-04, 50-296-82-4, NUDOCS 8204230508
Download: ML20054D923 (1)


Text

.

APPENDIX A i

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Tennessee Valley Authority Docket Nos. 50-259 & 50-296 Browns Ferry I and 3 License Nos. DPR-33 & DPR-68 i

As a result of the inspection conducted on January 26-29, 1982, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980), the following 3

violation was identified.

I 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V as implemented by TVA Topical Report TVA-TR 75-01, paragraph 17.2.5 requires activities affecting quality be 1

accomplished in accordance with procedures.

TVA N-0QAM, Part II, Section l

6.3, paragraph 2.4 requires NDE personnel to enter their level of i

certification on nondestructive examination reports. TVA Procedure MAI-21, j

" Control of Torus Modification Activities", dated April 15,

1981,

]

Appendix B, paragraph 3.3 requires welding electrodes to be maintained in electrode ovens separated by heat number.

1 Contrary to the above, on January 27-29, 1982, activities affecting quality I

were not accomplished in accordance with procedures in that:

1.

A number of nondestructive examination reports did not identify the level of certification (Level I, II, or III) of the NDE personnel performing the examination.

)

2.

Type E-309-15 weiding electrodes from two different batches / lots / heats t

were mixed together in one compartment of an electrode oven in the Unit 3 torus welding electrode issue station.

l This is a Severity Level VI Violation (Supplement I.F).

J Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to

'this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged viola-tions; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full. compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending ~ your response time for good cause shown.

Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

[

Date:

I i

?

8204280"c%

l l

,_.-.-n

- - - - - -