ML20053E299
| ML20053E299 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 05/21/1982 |
| From: | Spessard R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053E300 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8206070781 | |
| Download: ML20053E299 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000010/1982004
Text
,
.
MAY 21 1982
Docket No. 50-10
Docket No. 50-237
Docket No. 50-249
Commonwealth Edison Company
A'1TN :
Mr. Cordell Reed
Vice President
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs. T. M. Tongue
and M. J. Jordan of this office during the period of January 30 through April 2,
1982, of activitics at Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, author-
ized by NRC Operating Licenses No. DPR-02, No. DPR-19 and No. DPR-25 and to the
discussion of our findings with you at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and in-
torviews with personae 1.
During this inspection, it was determined that you were in noncompliance with
NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Appendix.
Item 2 in the
Appendix involves failure to comply with certain aspects of a TMI Task Action
Item.
Escalated enforcement action was considered for this item.
It is noted,
however, that this TMI Task Action Item (II.B.4 Training for Mitigating Core
Damage) is substantially concerned with training of licensed personnel and
shift technical advisors and only requires training of instrument, health
physics, and chemistry personnel commensurate with their responsibilities.
As stated in Paragraph 14 of the enclosed report, our inspector found that
this training had been substantially completed as required but the training
program did not address the training of instrument, health physics, and
chemistry personnel.
Because you met the most significant portions of this
requirement, this violation is classified as Severity Level IV.
We want to
emphasize our concern with your failure to recognize that you were not in
full compliance with the requirements of this Task Action Item.
Your response
should address these matters and provide an assessment of the adequacy of your
review of TMI Task Ac tion Item requirements and commitments.
In accordance with 10 CFI. 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information
that you (or your contractors) belie.ve to be exempt from disclosure under
0$hhohho
f&7/ 2 f
,
,
.
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by tele--
phone within ten (10) days from the date of this letter of your intention
to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within twenty-five (25)
days from the date of this letter _a written application to this office to
withhold such information.
If your receipt of this letter has been
delayed such that less than seven (7) days are available for your review,
please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be estab-
lished. Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must
be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information
which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which
contains a full statement of the reasons which are the bases for the claim
that the information should be withheld from public disclosure. This section
further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations
listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The information sought to be withheld shall be
incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we
do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above,
a copy of this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will
be placed in the Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter (and the accompanying Notice) are
not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and
Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
Original signed by R. L. Spessard
R. L. Spessard, Director
Division of Project and
Resident Programs
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix, Notice
of Violation
2.
Inspection Reports
No. 50-10/82-04(DPRP),
No. 50-237/82-06(DPRP) and
No. 50-249/82-06(DPRP)
cc w/encis:
Louis 0. Dc1 George, Director
of Nuclear Licensing
D. J. Scott, Station
Superintendent
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII
Mary Jo Murray, Office of
Assistant Attorney General
7
R I
R II
RIIIg
RIII
RII f
Wil
so
Roph
Cree
Wa nick
eAard
5/21/d2
/
g