ML20053E305
| ML20053E305 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 05/21/1982 |
| From: | Spessard R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053E300 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-010-82-04, 50-10-82-4, 50-237-82-06, 50-237-82-6, 50-249-82-06, 50-249-82-6, NUDOCS 8206070785 | |
| Download: ML20053E305 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _
Appendix NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-10 Docket No. 50-237 Docket No. 50-249 As a result of the inspection conducted during the period of January 30 through April 2, 1982, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 47 FR 9987 (March 9, 1982), the following violations were identified:
1.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XII, requires measures be estab-11shed to assure gages used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated, and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within necessary limits. The licensee's Quality Assurance Procedure Q.P. 12-52, requires the Master Instrument Mechanic to prepare lists and calibration schedules for instrumenta-tion used for conformation to a limiting condition for operations.
Also, the licensee Quality Assurance Program, Sectica 12.7, requires that in the operation of generating station, the equipment will be periodically calibrated or adjusted to assure that accuracy is main-tained within necessary limits in order to verify design measurements.
Contrary to the above, while observing the surveillance testing of the Standby Liquid Control (SBLC) System on Unit 2, the resident inspector noticed that the flow indicator had not been calibrated. The surveil-lance procedure (DOS 1100-1) uses the Rotometer flow indicator to verify the monthly surveillance requirement of " Pump minimum flow rate of 39 GPM shall be verified against a system head of 1275 psig", in Paragraph 4.4.A.1 of the Technical Specifications. The flow indicator did not appear on the Master Instrument Mechanics prepared list and scheduled calibration, nor was there any indication of when the last time the flow indicator had been calibrated.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).
2.
10 CFR 50.54(h) states that the licensee shall be subject to the pro-visions of the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission. On July 10, 1981, the Commission issued an order confirming the licensee's.
commitments on Post-TMI related issues. Appendix A, of the subject 8206070705 820521 PDR ADOCK 05000010 0
Appendix 2
order listed Item II.B.4, Training on Mitigating Core Damage with dates of January 1,1981, for having availabic for review a training program for mitigating core damage and a date of March 1, 1981, for implementing the_ training program.
Item II.B.4 of NUREG-0737, required training on mitigating core damage for (1) Shif t Technical Advisors and operating personnel from the plant manager through the operations chain to the licensed operators, and (2) Managers and Technicians in the Instrumenta-tion and Control (I&C), health physics, and chemistry departments shall receive training commensurate with their responsibilities.
Contrary to the above, while reviewing the licensee's training for Item II.B.4, the resident inspector found that the licensee's training program on mitigating core damage did not (nclude I&C, health physics and chemistry personnel.
In spite of this. programmatic deficiency, the inspector observed that significant portions of these personnel as discussed in paragraph 14 of this report had been trained on the proce-dures for mitigating core damage commensurate with their responsibilities.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written state-ment or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full comr pliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
MAY 21 1982 gg Dated R. L. Spessard, Director Division of Project and Resident Programs
.