ML20053B098
| ML20053B098 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/17/1982 |
| From: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| References | |
| ACRS-1938, NUDOCS 8205280035 | |
| Download: ML20053B098 (21) | |
Text
A&esa79/&
~
A?dMS- /f39 y
REcemgg p 7-.
'.I ~ -
P 0 1982 9
CERTIFIED COPY n'S%y;MA,?
DATE ISSUED: March 17, 1982
&,g s..... -
MINUTES OF THE ACRS SUBCOMM TE MANAGEMENT AND REACTOR RADIOLOGICAL EFFECTS MEETINGS, WASHINGTON, D.C., DECEMBER 18-19, 1982 The ACRS Subcommittees on Waste Management and Reactor Radiological Effects met in open and closed sessions in Room 1046, 1717 H St. N.W. in Washington, D.C. on December 18-19, 1981 to review current research in waste management}
and siting policy.
Notice of these meetings was published in The Federal Register on December 1, 1981 (Attachment A).
A copy of the detailed schedule of presentation is attached (Attachment B).
No written statements or requests for oral state-ments were received from members of the public. No written reports were issued or approved by the subcommittees at these meetings.
A list of atten-dees at these meetings is attached (Attachment C). The documents provided to the subcommittee during these meetings are attached to the office copy.
Opening Statement by Subcommittee Chairman Dr. Moeller, Subcomm'ittee Chairman, opened the meeting at about 8:30 a.m.,
noting that the purpose of the first day of the meeting (December 18, 1981) was to discuss and review current research on waste management.
He mentioned that during the first day of the meetings, emergency planning would also be dis-cussed.,,
l He also noted that the second day of the meetings (December 19,1981) would cover siting as well as the source terms postulated for various accident j
scenarios and occupational doses within commercial nuclear power plants.
li
~,3 l
! L DESIGNATED ORIGINAL 8205280oss cerune sy df,o y
WM & RE/SE MINUTES Finally, Dr. Moeller noted that the meetings were being conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the government in the Sunshine Act. Jchn McKinley is the Designated Federal Employee and Herman Alderman of the ACRS Staff is in attendance.
Pacific Basin Joint Feasibility Review - Michael J. Lawrence, DOE The first presentation of the day was in closed session.
Portions of the presentation were based upon information provided by a foreign gover-ment in confidence, so this portion was closed. Mr. Lawrence described the study objective as to assess feasibility of locating a facility for extended, retrievable storage of spent nuclear fuel in the Pacific basin.
Some of the key points of the study are:
1.
30 year storage 2.
U.S. Regulatory framework used 3.
Candidate concepts were:
silo, drywell, vault, storage cask and water basin l
4.
The selected concepts were storage cask and vault.
Objectives are to:
l l
Assess:
Pacific Basin interest and requirements, 1
i Island political, social and cultural attitudes Define:
Siting criteria; regulatory criteria, functional criteria i
Develop:
Membership and organizational principles; material l:
accountability and control organization; financing strategies; business operations.
l!
l l
l l
1 L
WM & RE/SE MINUTES Dr. Porizek, Pennsylvania State University, Impact of Glaciation or High Level Waste Repositories Dr. Parizek noted the concerns are about the ways in which geological phenomena might occur to create a breach in a repository. Concerns deal with the crustal instabilities associated with the onset of glaciation, and when a glacier might retreat from a given area; the crustal instabi-lities would be in the form of faults that might be quite active, causing pathways that radionuclides could migrate along, and also dis-rupted fracture mechanics that might in fact rupture the canisters and cause stress corrosion and other things in the waste packages.
One possible important consequence of glaciation, Dr. Parizek mentioned, is the way it would perturb the ground water flow. Another important con-sequence of glaciation is the climate effect.
Even if a glacier doesn't reach a repository, the climate effects could influence the repository.
The climate changes would be global in nature, and would result in a cooling trend and increased precipitation.
A desert area could become a semi desert area.
W. Weart, S;ndia, Update on the WIPP Site, Current DOE Research Mr. Weart described the location of the WIPP site as about 25 miles east of the city of Carlsbad in New Mexico. Work has been going on at this location since the early 1970's.
The WIPP mission was described as the deposition of defense transuranic waste and to do experiments with defense waste. Mr. Weart mentioned that there are also some programs at Sandia which deal with the interactions between com-mercial high level waste and salt environments.
WM-RE/SE MINUTES One of the issues of concern is how salt is dissolved. WIPP has done a number of studies to address the mechanism of deep dissolution; how far it has encroached into the Delaware Basin and whether it imperils the WIPP site.
Mr.
Weart noted that evidence indicates that all of the dissolution that has occurred has happened in the last six to ten million years.
Mr. Weart discussed waste interaction and rock response. The present program envisions a series of in situ tests. These studies will be focused on the shaft.
Stress and deformation measurements will be made.
These tests will look at repository rooms under ambient conditions, rooms which are designed to the same size and standards as the eventual reposi-tory rooms.
Later tests will include a program of simulated waste experi-ments which will consider thermal loading and thermal gradients.
Finally when radioactive material can be used, the program will do radiation source experiments.
Dr. F. Parker. Vanderbilt, NRC/NAS Review of the Swedish Waste Plan Dr. Parker noted that the stipulation in the waste review state, "These are,
the conditions which have to be met before a nuclear reactor can be charged, or the power company must produce a contract which adequately meets t5e re-quirements for the supervising of spent nuculear fuel.
The power company.
must also demonstrate how and where the absolutely safe fuel depository of highly radioactive waste can be effected.
Alternately, the power company must prove how and where the absolutely safe final disposition of spent but not reprocessed nuclear fuel can be effected."
i e
WM/RE/SE MINUTES '
The four major power companies that were involved in nuclear energy formed a group known as KBS.
Dr. Parker outlined the major achievements of the Swedish group.
1.
In a single year, they produced a complete system safety analysis of the whole back end of the fuel cycle, including risk assessments.
2.
They gave much more prominence to the use of the multiple barrier system.
3.
They advanced the study of fracture hydrology.
4 They highlighted the importance of temperature.
5.
They subjected their results to international review and they published the results of all the reviews.
Sweden has a contract with France through which radioactive wastes
'from Sweden will be processed in France. The waste would be vitrified and returned to Sweden for storage for about 30 years before it goes to i
j_
the final repository.
The vitrified waste would be stored in canisters il j
' encased in le;d and titanium.
li,
Ilj Spe ' fuel rods will be encased in lead.
Surrounding the lead will be a
l, a coppec canister. The canister will weight 20 tons, including 2 tons of H y fuel, 2-1/2 tons of lead around the fuel, and 15-1/2 tons of copper on the outside.
i s
{\\
l
\\
I i
L s
o e
WM/RE/SE-MINUTES J. Surmeier, NRC, Recent High Level Waste Regulation Mr. Surmeier noted that in the 96th Congress, there were over 48 major pieces of legislation on high-level radioactive waste.
In the area of spent fuel storage, all of the bills except for the Science Committee have set up limited AFR capacities. Mr. Surmeier noted the reason for this was that, if deep geologic storage is not licensed, there will be a fallback position.
The Energy Committee suggested that a study should be done on the viabil-ity of a monitored retrievable storage system.
Mike Bell, Herb Miller, R. Wright, High Level Waste Program Overview Mr. Bell noted that during Fiscal 81, his group issued the final licensing procedures for high level waste.
The proposed technical criteria have been published and later this fiscal year, they should be issued in final fo rm.
Mr. Bell mentioned that the activities in his program will te shifting away from emphasis on developing regulations, on following DOE's activities, and exploring sites for repositories; to begin to focus on the ways that are intended to implement the regulations and to work out the i
methods and the data requirements that are going to be required eventually l
to license a high level waste repository.
t l
Mr. Miller noted that they expect and are planning for a repository license application at the beginning of Fiscal year 1988. He remarked that an ele-ment of the NRC program has been a critical review of the Department of Energy's work. This has been conducted primarily through evaluations of the l
technical documents they have produced.
i l
WM/RE/SE MINUTES He noted that NRC has gone out into the field to review DOE's activities at the sites and in the labs.
As specific examples he mentioned several trips to the Hanford site, as well as trips to NTS, a trip to the Gulf coast region to look at the dome salt work, end a trip to the Utah-Texas region looking at bedded salt work.
Mr. Wright discussed the exploratory work at the Hanford site.
He noted there were five drill holes t' hat.have been completed and tested hydro-logically during the last several years, and that most of the knowledge of the deep groundwater conditions has been collected from these holes.
The hydrologic information is being collected in order to determine the flow path and discharge point of ground waters that might carry radionuclides away from the repository to the accessible ervironment.
He noted a shortcoming in that all of the drilling to date and the drilling plans for the future are in small holes, less than four inches in diameter.
Mr. Wright noted that for good hydrological information at least eight inch holes are needed.
Another problem area, he noted, was that there has been literally zero information collected to date about vertical permeability.
In the modeling that has been done, certain values have to be assumed, be-cause no test values have been obtained.
l Mr. Wright noted that the project people believe that ground waters would l
move away from DC 22 (an exploratory shaft) to the southeast, under the Columbia river, down under the Snake River, and emerge at the surface of the WALULLA gap. The U.S. Geological Survey believes the flow would be directly l
WM/RE/SE-MINUTES under the Columbia River. The Pacific Northwest Laboratories at Battelle, model shows the flow would be directly upward out the repository to the near surface aquifers.
Mr. Wright stated that their recommendation to DOE and the project was that an early effort should be made to investigate the difference in these viewpoints and hopefully to reach some sort of consensus about the differences.
F. Arsenault, NRC, J. J. Davis, NRC, Waste Management Research Mr.
Arsonault noted there is a distinction between the research NRC must do and the research that is appropriate for DOE.
Mr. Davis remarked that the waste management program is divided into three sub-elements, high-level, low-level and uranium recovery.
He noted that there is an increased interest in models for predicting performance and determining what are the critical issues.
Mr. Davis mentioned because of DOE's interest in an in situ test facility, NRC has backed out of their own plans, and are using DOE's studies.
Mr. Davis noted that the research objectives are to provide validated techni-cal information to support the independent assessments that are needed to license the proposed site and to review the plans for the repository. Mr.
Davis noted some of the accomplishments of the past year. Among these were:
Laboratory tests to confirm that the proposed canister material would be resista,nt to pit corrosion under basic conditions; studies of glass under laboratory conditions; and leaching studies. Mr. Davis noted that ongoing work to resolve some of the unknowns included:
In the area of geochemistry, pre-dictions of long term behavior of the radionuclides, long term geological changes; bore hole sealing and plugging; and prediction of extremely long-term performance of enoineered components.
WM & RE/SE MINUTES Mr. Jamgochian NRC, Emergency Planning Research Mr. Jamochian outlined projects planned for fiscal year 1982 and 1983.
These included:
1.
Emergency preparedness interfaces between the Federal, state and local governments. This is a review of actions necessary by governmental agencies, with an emphasis on interfaces.
2.
Warning system effectiveness. This will analyze the effective-ness of the public notification systems at sites, including the impact of differences in topography and demography, as well as the effectiveness of different kinds of public alert systems.
3.
Human factors in emergency response accident conditions. This is a project to perform an analysis of the operators, senior opera-tors, management and local governmental officials in the early stages of an energency, in order to determine where improvements are necessary, especially in the decision making process, prior to the taking of protective actions.
4.
Accident analysis for material licensees. Estimates will be made on the upper bound doses and consequences as a function of license limits, and then a technical basis will be developed for requiring emergency preparedness using l
the EPA Protective Action Guides.
December 19, 1982 Meeting of ACRS Subcommittee in Reactor Radiological Effects Ll Members Present ACRS Consultants Present Dade Moeller, Chairman D. Orth Jeremiah Ray F. Parker Robert Axtmann R. Foster h
J. C. McKinl ey, Desig. Fed. Emp1.
M. Steindler 4
WM/RE/SE MINUTES Dr. Moeller noted that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss and review current research in siting, fission product release and transport, and reducing occupational exposures in nuclear power plants.
Frank Arsenault, NRC Introduction, Siting Research Mr. Arsenault provided a brief update on the work that has been done to support the siting rule made by the Commission. He noted that the Staff considered that a sector limitation to control the possibility of population i
centers might also be desirable.
One possibility that was suggested was that no more than one-quarter of the people within the zones could be lo-cated in two adjacent 22 and one-half degree sectors. Currently the Staff considered a reasonable population density of 250 people per square mile from the one-half mile exclusion area to the two mile annulus, and 750 people per square mile between the two and ten mile annuluses.
In response to a question regarding the time scale for limiting population density, Mr. Arsenault noted that the present criteria are for the time of licensing.
Some of the draft safety goals include not only gcals for li-censing but also goals for time periods following licensing.
Mr. Ott, NRC, Siting Research Mr. Ott noted that work is going on to evaluate hazards in siting. The near site. vicinity is being examined and then the external hazards are being considered. They are presently trying to define a list of special activities that special attention should be given to and to assess some kind of distance which will necessarily be rather large compared to the hazard. As an example, Mr. Ott noted that a small explosive operation at ten miles that could 1
1
(
9
WM/RE/SE MINUTES impact a plant site could probably be dealt within a short paragraph but a natural gas facility within three quarters of a mile of a plant would require a more substantial treatment.
Regarding socioeconomic impact issues, Mr. Ott noted a number of efforts are planned in this area.
Some of these involve the transfer of.;gency activities to state review programs. Workshops are conducted to obtain the opinion of state personnel on how it would be best to transfer some of these functions to the states.
In response to a question regarding the potential impact of the loss of a major resource due to an accident, Mr. Ott noted that the siting rule making had a specific subtask that was subcontracted to the UN Affairs Research Park Center.
This subtask went into things like socioeconomic impacts of accidents. Mr.
Ott mentioned that the primary thrust 50 far in terms of societal impacts evalu-ations has been directed to loss of land values.
It tends to optimize on urban land because capital intensive development makes the value there higher.
Leon Beratan, NRC, E'arth Sciences, Environmental Research Mr. Beratan noted that Earth Sciences addresses the earth sciences, geology, seismology, soils, hydrology, both surface and ground water, and meteorology.
In the geology / seismology area the fundamental issue is, that because the seis-micity-is basically unknown, and there is difficulty in applying the existing NRC seismological and geological criteria siting criteria for plants in the Eastern United States, one of the projects is the revision of Appendix A to
.?
WM/RE/SE MINUTES In the area of meteorology, Mr. Beratan noted two programs. One concerning severe storms. This is being phased out. The second is in the atmospheric dispersion area, where the issue is to provide an improved basis for licensing decisions and for development and confirmation of regulations, standards and guides, particularly in the area of emergen:y preparedness.
Mr. Beratan noted that in the area of hydrology they need to develop a basis for staff analysis of the ultimate heat sink and cooling tower performance.
Under siting concepts, his group is planning to initiate research on exploring a potential method to develop a methodology to evaluate the consequences of the liquid pathway in the event of a class 9 accident for all types of sites.
Dr. Mills, NRC, Health Ef fects The Health Effects Branch has been reorganized to provide additional expertise in the area of exposure health effect relationship.
l Dr. Mills noted that he is working on the revision of two standards. One is a revision of Part 20 concerning radiation protection; the other is that l
portion of Part 35 which deals with medical licensing projects.
Dr. Mills l
mentioned that areas of interest include the metabolic behavipe of different 1
l nuclides, not only from the standpoint of its radioactive properties but also its fohas a chemical compound., Another area of special interest deals with dosimetry fat. tors.
The concentration in a human organ has to be translated l
into an energy response.
l
WM/RE/SE MINUTES
.+.9._
Other projects that Dr. Mil' s
l.
Studies of the met uranium-plutonium l 2.
A study of the exc v:
3.
A follow-up study for diagnostic pur Mr. Silberberg, NRC, Fissio Mr. Silberberg introduced t outlined the technical base LWR accidents.
He discusse of the comments were favora the Commission was that by terms should be completed.
Mr. Sherry, NRC, Fission Pr Mr. Sherry noted that he be certainties in predicting r currently very, very large, clusion that can be drawn i particular small break and tially larger retention fac
- uglf}
coolant system than was cor hff) dicated that because of aei
~~:< "
within the containment, set n
(i.e., on the order of 10 I source term.
Finally Mr.
- WM-RE/SE MINUTES NUREG-0772 is that cesium iodide should be the predominant chemical fom of iodine during LWR accident sequences.
Mr. Sherry noted the research program, which they tem as NUREG-0772 follow up research, has as its objectives to develop an updated set of release from plant source terms for severe LWR accidents.
Another important objec-tive is to determine the range of bncertainty associated with these pre-dictions and the major sources of these uncertainties.
Mr. R. Alexander, NRC, Occupational Exposures in Comercial Nuclear Power Plants Mr. Alexander noted that the basic objective of their program is the develop-ment of a comprehensive body of regulations, guidance and infomation which, if appropriately implemented, would assure an adequate degree of radiation protection for workers in NRC licensed activities. Mr. Alexander mentioned l
that the program is divided into five elements: Occupational ALARA, health physics measurements improvement; internal dose control, personnel perfomance improvement; and licensing improvement.
l The specific objectives for the occupational ALARA is to integrate that con-cept within the agency's routine licensing and inspection programs.
r The specific objective in health physics improvement is the establishment and use of, accreditation and certification programs.
[
In personnel perfomance improvement, the specific objective is to develop and implement effective methods for improving the safety perfomance of workers.
WM/RE/SE MINUTES In licensing improvement, the objective is to standardize health physics requirements which facilitate the licensing process.
Mr. M. Jankowski, NRC, Decontamination Occupational Radiation Dose Reduction Program Mr. Jankowski noted that the basic objective of the program is to establish a data base to determine occupational exposure rates due to maintenance, inspection, decontamination, and associated waste treatment and disposal. A secondary objective is to provide and use the data base, to have a detailed understanding of the corrosion product formation and transport, corrosion pro-duct removal, and the basis of waste treatment chemistry and engineering. A third objective is to determine the effects of operating conditions such as temperature, water quality, radiation, and some specific equipment designs on the behavior of corrosion products, their activation, and their location throughout the reactor system.
The decontamination program consists of three specific research projects.
t The first is decontamination effectiveness and its impact on occupation ex-posure reduction.
The second is corrosion product buildup. The third is decontamination impacts on solidification and waste disposal.
Executive Session The Subcommittee met in Executive Session to review the meeting. The Consul-tants expressed their individual < viewpoints.
The meeting adjourned at 4:35 p.m.
NOTE:
A complete transcript of the meeting is on file at the NRC Public Document Room at 1717 H St., NW., Washington, D.C. or can be obtained
(
from Alderson Reporters, 300 7th St., SW, Washington, D.C. (202) 554-2345.
l l
58386 Federal Register / Vol. 46. No. 230 / Tuesday. December 1.1981 / Notices outlir.e of the content of the Administration. Code 13-4 Washington.
De agenda for subject meeting shall presentation Oral presentations will be D.C. 20546 (202/7554380) be as follows:
scheduled at the discretion of the suces.anstwtany seconnaAriose De gg
%gg Chairman of the Committee to the extent Panelis chartered by the Congress (Pub.
28.1tst which time permits.
L 90 67), and chaired by Willis M.
For additional information centact:
Hawkins his meeting is open to the AJO o.m. Untilthe Condusion of Clarence Page. Division of Consumer public up to the seating capacity of the
- usiness Affairs. Occupational Safety and Health room (approximately 55 persons.
Administretion. Room N-3635. Third includmg Panel members). Visitors will During the iniHal porhon of the Street and Constitution Avenue. NW.
be requested to sign a visitor's register.
meetmg. the Subcommittee, along with Wa shington. D C. 20210. Telephone:
To assure adequate sesting for all.
any of its consultants who may be (202) 523 4 024 members of the public planning to Present, will exchange preliminary Official records of the meetings will attend the meeting should contact views regarding matters to be be available for public inspection at the Gilbert L Roth on 202/75M380 considered dunna the balance of the Division of Consumer Affai s November 24.1981
" U "8 signed at Washington D C th.s 25th day of Russell Ritch e.
De Subcommittee will then hear November 19e1 Deput) Associate AdministreforforEntemol eventations by and hold discussions
/te/otions with representatives of the NRC Staff.
U their consultants. and other interested r
in o. ei.aon r=4 n-am en..,
Assistant Secretor) o lot.c-Persons regarding this review.
m mot ni as in o-m-a.u a.e n.sw e o."
Further information regarding topics
" " Co*' "
- 8 "
to be discussed. whether the meeting
- - - - - NUCLEAR REGULATORY has been cancelled or rescheduled, the a nan ruling on nquests for th NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND opportunity to present oral statements SPACE ADMINISTRATION V Advisory Comml? tee on Reactor and the time allotted therefor can be y,, gi,yg; Safeguards. Combined Subcommittees obtained by a prepaid telephone call to on Waste Management and Reactor the cognizant Staff E.ngmeer.Mr.
Aerospace Safety Advisory Panet.
Radiological Ettects; Meeting Herman Alderman ! telephone 202/634-Meetmg De ACRS Combined Subcommittees 1414) between a 15 a.m and 5:00 p.m.,
acency: National Aeronautics and on Waste Management and Reactor EST. The Designated Federal Employee Space Admmistration Radiological Effects will hold a meeting for this meeting is Mr. lohn C. McKinley.
on December 18 and 19,1961. Room I have determined. In accordance with actioec Notice of meetmg 1046.1717 H Street NW., Washington.
Subsection 10(d) of the Federal D C. De Subcommittees will review the Advisory Committee Act, that it may be sunsasARV;In aCCordance With the current research in waste management necessary to close some portions of this Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub and eiting policy. Notice of this meeting meetmg The authority for such closure.
L 32-463. as amended, the National was published October 29-is Exemption 4 to the Sunshine Act. 5 Aeronautics and Space Admmistration in accordance with the procedures U.S C. 552(c)(4).
announces a forthcoming meeting of the outlined in the Federal Register on Dated November 25.tael Aerospace Sefet) Adosory Panel September 30.1981 (46 FR 47903), oral DATE Also Tiest: January 21.1982. 2 p m.
or wntten statements may be presented John C. Hoyle, to 4 p m.
by members of the publ.c. recordmgs Admisory Committee Management Offe.
ApoRess: National Aeronautics and will be permitted only during those in om si-ausirue n-aw so. i Space Admmistration. Review Center, portions of the meeting when a am.o coot naa.
Room 7002. 40c Mar >!and Asenue SW.,
transcript is being kept, and questions Federal Buildmg 6. Washington. D C.
may be asked only by rnembers of the 20546 Subcommittee. its consultents, and Staff. Advisory Committee on Reactor Persons desiring to.fiske oral Safeguards, Subcommittee on stat a nts s ul n y
es gna Advaned ReadoCocaUon Gange Pu Post or satt i : he Panel will E } '
present its annual report to the NASA e,';e
, thet sppropri De ACRS Subcommittee on Admmistrator.This as pursuant I arrangements can be made to a!!ow the Advanced Reactors scheduled to be carr> mg out its statutory duties for necessary time during the meeting for held on December 3 and 4.1981 at the which the Panel reviews. es aluates. and auch statements.
Bellevue Hotel in San Francisco, CA has adsises on those program activities.
The entire meeting will be open to been changed to the Argonne National s3 stems. procedur,es and management public attendance except for those Laboratory. Building 208. Room C-234.
policie6 that contribute to nsk and th' nessions during which the Subcommittee Argonne. II.
identification and assessment of these finds it necessary to ensure the security All other items regarding this meeting for management. Prionty is given to ofinformation identified and supplied remain the same as announced in the those programs that invol by a foreign gosernment in confidence. Federal Register published Monday, of manned flight De maj,ve the safety or subject will (Sunshine Act Ememption 4) One or November 16.1981 (46 FR 56283).
be the Space Shuttle Program and Space more closed sessions may be necessary Further information may be obtained Transportation S stem Operations.
to discuss such information. (Sunshine by a prepaid telephone call to the 3
FOR FURTHER INroRM ATioM CONTACT:
Act exemption 4). To the extent cognizant Designated Federal Employee Gilbert L Roth. Staff Director, practicable, these closed sessions will for this meeting. Mr. Elpidio Igne Aerospace Safety Adiisory Panel, be held so as to minimize incon$enience (telephone 202/634-1414) between 8:15 Natonal Aeronautics and Space to members of the public in attendance.
a.m. and 500 p.m. EST.
ATTACHMENT A
s-REVISED 12-14-81 4
b TENTATIVE AGENDA ACRS WASTE MANAGE'4ENT SUBCOM*11TTEE MEETING DECEMBER 18, 1981 Approximate time
' Topic Speaker 8:30 Introduction D. Moeller 8:35 a.m.
Pacific Basin Spent Fuel Storage.
M. Lawrence, DOE (CLOSED SESSION) 9:30 a.m.
Impact of Glaciation on High Level Waste Respository's R. Parizek, PA Statt 10:30 a.m.
BREAK 10:45 a.m.
Update on WIPP Site - Current W. Weart, Sandia DOE Research 11:45 p.m.
NRC/NAS Review of the Swedish F. Parker Waste Plan - Related Research Vanderbilt Needs 12:45 a.m.
+ + + + + +
LUNCH
++++++
l l
l 1:45 p.m.
Waste Management Research NRC l
3:00-3:15 BREAK l
3:15-5:00 p.m.
Vaste Management Research NRC '-
5:00-5:00 p.m.
Emergency Planning Research NRC 6:00 p.m.
Executive Session ATTACHMENT B
i
/
REVISED 12-14-81
(
TENTATIVE AGENDA ACRS SUBCOTtITTEE ON REACTOR RADIOLOGICAL EFFECTS MEETING DECEMBER 19, 1981 Anproximate time Topic Speaker 8:30 a.m.
Introduction D. Moeller 8:35 a.m.
Research on Sitina NRC 10:30 a.m.
BREAK 10:45 a.m.
Continuation of Research on Siting 12:30 p.m.
LUNCH 1:30 o.m.
Fission Product M. Silberberg, !!RC Release 4 Transport Research 3:30 p.m.
Research on Reducinq Occupational Exposure in Nuclear Power Plants Steyer/Jamgochian, NBC 4:30 p.m.
Executive Session
(
,EETING DATE: DECEMBER 18-19, 1981 St,'BCotelTTEE METING: _1&STE macDeer ;e:D REAcTop pxnintry vent,, g g
LOCATION: Ro0M 1046, 1717 H ST., IASHINGKFJ, D.C.
ATTENDANCE tf57 L ASE
/
TRI N T Aer ju Alloa 1.A3 3, yt+ f 'd. : e lx cs8/K'.-5 if(
,_c ((.% 7.W / C
[J4/43
/u f C 3, Gwxh/, R 4&a/4 E 5'S /R r S NRC iPJ / h/ m r. s_r uoM f4T MRR s, $HA)
.5 ORm !!/fR LAJ M PZ fj R C
- 6. [ * 'AS-N *(k u
- N MC I4 /r N F:wNrv Otui-T N C C--
y, 1~'
E b 's NI?C-
.)
l >
g_
Y.,
/
ID, i, 0f5
'h _ '
('
,n,
(/,.
i
- 5 0
b_a 0 h
-d 11, l'
l 31.
Kyo 5, _ Ktm J3.
h'4 E
hMCM Ecl w a,-L M. fo cl e l1_ !.< D
_3 a _
35, 5-fr.y r ! F. W=_l t a kiir NN-hU'
_16. bem> _ TTrv 1v eef Yb b
- u. Ulf) hd
--Saiudt 6t jp,
_ 4 'f Ng//. -
N' A'
/
.19.
_70.
21._
J_?,
~-
ATTACHMENT C 13,
_?_ 4. _
f HF.ETING ROOM:
og _
,mm t
.UMISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUAP.D5 HEETING ON M_NAqR AND REACIOR PADIOM3L F"Fu.TS DECEMBER 18 19, 1981, WASHINGIU;,' D.C.
^
PL'"% g( {
a:mm,--. w -
-> M... k ATTENDT_E_3 Pl. EASE SICN LEl.C
K b4 Nett BADGE NO.
/JFILIAT10'
\\
~
I
'~ h 2 (M
[
d 4n
/-
--.h' -_ ~]
$4a l 6 ( vi et
) 5 -e s % _ _
m M._ s._
n, 0-
)
---n ( l 9- - -.,,_.J..l-4 i~ & 02 'o---*-
s,b <n 4.171-._, + - - _ _ _
.1
.A.Qvit- -- amesmus w e _
_-,J--
'l pr=wama w.s=
h b~l l
~ ) _..
N I, # 7 s,.e[3 e s'... -t t
w -
,._4 w
m.
- -- = -
r.: -
,_v
,,, r it _LI.m_ d s u.L._=_
- s. _QLLy 1-p
%K1 l
m._.- d e _o >,.
- m. _, _m w 1
_ I.
Ie
[
"'s
'\\
'8
( M hA-
[g
- b-i s
J-e
. A EI.M.A
- amssumpraarnasruns rms:
r - a mr.ng..aia.maves s se-c us sur h.'
i c_.w.\\
.,m,_.
s.a V____%
J0.- - -
.t_ -t 1
Y m._. _.,_._ _
)
p'___..
h h.
X
--..dt ser.TE.Tt'*== *5r.Me n'"
= e.c;*1er. tea m'. ass.st,2 m samur. tsstrussaur cyrzar. ssmwnstmuamacarun.N==** men.m ar m yaemums h
1me-.
a- - ----
e,- ---- ~
mm.
'xr.cuser r.s. uraem =rr=u3 as.--a 's asha,e.Ed > 5 -'^ -
==:r/r =8redu:388 8 samr mesangr':t*mr=="a e avuncar stunir assaunc st -
i ysar.-ssk' avasmwearmsw.U*-'== -- - - - - - a7
, aruz.encs.mir u.ra r asr.,-s.sc:
" - : :====-== -aram rea.marasm'.'s e *:r-resum;;x::
b.-
= =.
-e -
. m,,
. l.- m - m m. u m m.
-- - ~
mr-- - -
--es=
um,-
n.
i j
-,- _ n _
,-i p
U w e:,_
, _.._ _ -].- _ _.,J Q _ _ _
_____..-_1.___-.,_r.s.~.-,._,
n
~ _ _
e
"--- hey a s.w.eserwuneet:e:,a.:n taws,.sa.s.
-c :mmeme.u;;; se..xa swe.dj ur.:. wm sr= *-m-Lamaw-
- rir.sEM i
4, l
I ar6v A7:sts.dLa-a.is ;.b, r2sia. umr p. =
.w w v.a.r.:-sar*W.ya s asa] waswa wsw.u rve.v 7A *smt; i.*
,t 1,_.
i
~ - -
m Q
,)EETINGDATE:
DECEMBER 18-19, 1981 SUBI.atHITTEE MEETING: _ imSTE WaGEFEC AND N anmvry Te nt nygg ICOM 1046, 1717 H ST., IRSHINGIM, D.C.
OCAT]DN:.
h ATTENDANCE LIST TLEASE
~
W TRI N T Att1Ll_Al1ON leR4t 3
, / sov hL~/:.n "At d'S'd_hc.f$
i ll RE:
A AE C E.1
.-d i'. J jy ll, n p th l'.
C C % - ! Y AC-7l.
( l 0)
{
o's AYlf O'/YS a' g _, n ;
]
lG g L t 1 * > ~ ~~
~
g,
/2'5-M M A Mel S dk4ci<
s.
,,,niorw UkNKow4G P E S - C E (3 Q, g
& c;J 76 5. - DR E - FGE g
e_
10.
11.
_17.
_13.
_14.
15.
16.
17.
18,_
.19.
70.
71._
=
_? ?,
..+,m e
_ _ _.. _, _.. _ _ _. ". _.. ~. _.