ML20052G177

Responds to NRC 820318 Ltr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-413/82-01 & 50-414/82-01.Corrective Actions: Procedure Revised to Include Requirements for Insp of Stored Matls

ML20052G177
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	04/16/1982
From:	Parker W DUKE POWER CO.
To:	James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20052G178	List: ML20052G177
References
NUDOCS 8205140378
Download: ML20052G177 (2)

Text

F .

DUK E POWER COMPANY '

Powra Ucitorwo 422 Sourn Cnuncu STurzt. CruntoTTE, N. C. asa-sa WIL LI AM O. PA R et E R, J R.

. 2 ' ' "s 7_2 db-l0 Vice Perseorgt Sv tane Pnooyctiog p g gg Trttewoe.t:Aata 704 373 49g3 Y

O) 9 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RbCElygg Region II S; fffyy [

101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 - c c3m ., /082g -))

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 9 8%irt 4 0m, man Re: RII: ABR U b

50-413/82-01 N f 50-414/82-01

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Please find attached a response to Viciation No. 413-414/82-01-01 as identified in the kove referenced Inspection Report. Duke Power Company does not consider any information contained in this inspection report to be proprietary.

Very truly yours, f))fJW}11 h- dlYlWh William O. Parker, Jr.

l RWO/php Attachment cc: Mr. P. K. Van Doorn NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station l Mr. Robert Guild, Esq.

( Palmetto Alliance 1

l l

l 8205140378 920416 PDR ADOCK 05000413 0 PDR

/[hl 7

Olft

Duke Power Company Catawba Nuclear Station Violation:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B Criteria XVII, as implemented by Duke Power Company Topical Report Duke-1 paragraph 17.1.17, requires records shall bc maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality and inspection records shall as a minimum identify the inspector, the type of observation, the results and the acceptability...

Contrary to the above,' on February 23-26, inspection records did not identify the inspector,- type of observation, the results and acceptability of the inspection in that no inspection records were initiated for the periodic-general-storage inspections that were made of the yard area adjacent to the containment and auxiliary buildings.

Response

1. Duke Power Company admits this violation.

The reasons for this violation were as follou: Construction Procedure 371

~

2.

and Equipment Special Storage and Maintenance Inspection Form (Form P-3A Serial Number M-145) refer only to stored equipment, not to stored materials.

Also, the latest revision of construction QA Procedure P-3 (storage inspec-tion) allows the option of documenting only discrepancies found as a result of the storage inspection.

3. Action has been taken to report all storage inspections performed whether or not discrepancies are discovered.

4. Construction Procedure 371 will be revised to include requirements for inspection of stored materials.

5. Full compliance will be achieved by July 31, 1982.

4 A

.