ML20052C507
| ML20052C507 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinch River |
| Issue date: | 04/30/1982 |
| From: | Copeland R, Lawrence M, Longenecker J JOINT APPLICANTS - CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR |
| To: | National Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8205050064 | |
| Download: ML20052C507 (64) | |
Text
g 4/30/82
/
tw, A
(:p;5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
_j
,)
k
, g g.0 pec b
,gg {
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
\\
p at f.x t M io +
)
In the Matter of
)
)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY )
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
)
Docket No. 50-537 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
)
)
(Clinch River Breeder Reactor
)
4' Plant)
)
)
e m
W
~ 7\\
T,/
je APPLICANTS ' UPDATED RESPONS [T'O N Of g
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL,1 INC. 3 (/hiy AND THE SIERRA CLUB FIRST SE'I\\ 0F e [A8 J
INTERROGATORIES TO APPLICANTS O s
Pursuant to 10 CFR S 2.74'0b, and in rdha with the Board's.Prehearing Conference Order of February 11, 1982, the United States Department of Energy, Proj ect Management Corporation, and the Tennessee Valley Authority (the Applicants) hereby file their updated responses to the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and the Sierra Club First Set of Interrogatories to the Applicants, dated 17, 1975. /
November
- /
Applicants previously filed responses to the First Set of Interrogatories on December 12, 1975, March 19, D c>3 1976, and April 29, 1976.
Applicants have prepared S
these updated responses to establish a current base of-y information for the CRBRP for the purpose of expediting these proceedings.
Acco rd ingly, in providing these f I responses, Applicants do not concede that the infor-mation contained therein admissible in or necessary to a decision in the LWA proceeding.
Applicants have not Continued 8205050064 820430 PDR ADOCK 0D000537 G
PDR t
c-r.
?
j r*
~
. Answers to General Ouestions (a) - (f)
(a)
Provide the direct answer to the question.
ANSWER:
See the direct answers below under heading
" ANSWER".
(b)
Identify all documents and studies, and the particular parts thereof, relied upon by Applicants, now or in the past, which serve as the basis for the answer.
In lieu thereof, at Applicants' option, a copy of such document and study may be attached to the answer.
ANSWER:
See the direct answers below under heading
" DOCUMENTS".
(c)
Identify principal documents and studies, snd the particular parts thereof, specifically examined but not cited in (b).
In lieu thereof, at Appli-cants' option, a copy of each such document and study may be attached to the answer.
furnished copies of or made available for inspection and copying those documents referenced in this response which were oreviously referenced and made available pursuant to che Applicants' previous responses.
Docu-ments referenced for 'the first time in this update response will be made available upon request.
General questions and responses follow the protocol a by the parties and attached to Mr. Greenberg' greed upon s March 8, 1982 letter to Counsel for PMC.
This updated response to interrogatory Set 1, No. 1 is also the updated response to NRDC's May 7, 1976 Request for Production of Documents.
Contact Warren Bergholz (252-6975) to makes arrangement for inspection and copying of such documents.
~
, ANSWER:
Unless otherwise indicated below in regard to the answer under the heading " DOCUMENTS"; none.
(d)
Identify by name, title and affiliation the primary Applicant employee (s) or consultant (s) who provided the answer to the question.
ANSWER:
See the attached affidavits.
~
(e)
Explain whether Applicants are presently engaged in or intend to engage in any further, ongoing research program which may affect Applicants' answer.
This answer need be provided only in cases where Applicants intend to rely upon ongoing research not included in Section 1.5 of the PSAR at the LWA or construction permit hearing ~on the CRBR. ' Failure to provide such an answer means that Applicants do not intend to rely upon the existence of any such research at the LWA or construction perment hearing on the CRBR.
ANSWER:
If not in Section 1.5 of the PSAR and the direct answer below; none.
(f)
Identify the expert (s) if any, which Applicants intend to have testify on the subj ect matter questioned, and state the qualifications of each such expert.
This answer may be provided for each separate question or for a group of related ques-tions.
This answer need not be provided until
i
. Applicants have in fact identified the expert (s) in question or determined that no expert will testify, as long as such answer provides rea-sonable notice to Intervenors.
ANSWER:
Applicants have not yet identified the expert (s) in question.
Answers to Specific Questions -
Interrogatory 1.
1.
List and briefly describe all written submittals made by any of the applicants (including TVA and Commonwealth Edison) with respect to the CRBR in the last five years to:
a)
Energy Research and Development Administration and its predecessor the Atomic Energy Commission; b)
Federal Energy Administration; c)
Any member of the United States Congress or his or her staff.
d)
Office of Management and Budget; e)
Any other official. of the Federal Government including employees of the White House.
Answer.
A list and brief description of all written submittals made by the Applicants with respect to the CRBRP since April 23, 1977 to ERDA, DOE, OMB, members of Congress
t
- and their staffs,'and other officials of the Federal Government and related to the contentions of NRDC, et al.
which have been admitted into these proceedings pursuant to a ruling by the Licensing Board are contained in Attachments A and B hereto.
(TVA and CE have no documents within the scope of the request).'
Interrogatories 2 - 5.
Withdrawn Interrogatory 6.
6.
To what extent is Applicant's decision to proceed with the construction of the CRBR at this time, at this place and with this decision, dependent upon the final position of the Energy Research and Development Administration to be expressed in the final impact statement on the LMFBR Program and the final decision of ERDA to be based on that impact statement.
Describe in detail each aspect of. those pending ERDA positions, the outcome of which could affect.
Applicant's decision.
- /
This also constitutes Applicants' updated response to NRDC's May 7,1976 Request for Production of Docu-ments.
Contact Warren Berglohz to make arrangements for inspection and copying.
. Answer.
A decision by the Applicants to construct the CRBRP is dependent upon realization of the following conditions:
1.
Completion of DOE's LMFBR Program Environmental Statement Supplement (DOE /EIS-0085-FS).
2.
A favorable Nuclear Regulatory Commission determination on CRBRP.
3.
Satisfaction of the criterion set forth in the proj ect agreement that "the plant be built and operated consistent with the provisions and the policies of applicable laws in respect to the protection of the environ-m en t" (see Exhibit A to Applicants' Statement of General Informa tion, paragraph 5.2.3, p. 16).
Based upon the information,available to the Applicants,
at this time, the Applicants believe that the Final Environment Statement Supplement on the LMFBR program will support continuance of the program and the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Proj ect.
Documents.
ERDA - 1535 DOE /EIS-0085-FS Interrogatory 7.
7.
Identify all documents, reports, memoranda, etc.
generated by. the Applicants or in their possession related
to the potential problems of sabotage or terrorist activity directed at the CRBR or any fuel cycle activities needed to support it.
Answer.
a)
A detailed list of documents, reports, meno-randa, etc. generated by the Applicants since April 23, 1977 or which came into their possession since that date, related to the costs of safeguards at the CRBRP or any of the fuel cycle activities needed to support the CRBRP, are identified and listed on Attachments C and D hereto.
Applicants will identify additional documents in response to NRDC Interroga-tory Set 18, III, Nos. 1-5.
Interrogatory 8..
8.
Will the Applicant proceed with construction of the CRBR regardless of what conditions may be imposed to cope with sabotage and terrorism and regardless of the cost of those conditions.
In answering the question address particularly your position on the following a)
The use of spiked plutonium in the fuel to be used in the CRBR.
b)
Psychological profile testing for all CRBR employees.
c)
Developments of a private armed security force by the Applicants sufficient to prevent a well-armed-terrorist group from gaining access to the reactor.
A i
- /
d)
The permanent presence of United States military personnel at the CRBR site and their control of all security at the site.
ge)
Suspension of any provisions of the constitution, such as the freedom from illegal searches and seizures and the freedom of speech and association, with respect to employees of the CRBR.
Answer.
The Applicants presently intend to proceed with the construction of the CRBRP if reasonable security conditions and safeguards measures are imposed to cope with sabotage and terrorism.
More specifically, the Applicants are committed to compliance with all current and applicable NRC rules.and regulations with regard to such matters con-tained in 10 CFR Parts-11, 25, 50, 70, 73, and 95.
Reviews have beenTconducted of the security conditions and safe-Y guards measures that presently comprise the elements of the
. anticipated CRBRP Safeguards Program which will be imple-t
't mented to. comply with these rules and regulations.
CRBRP PSAR, Ch.<13.7.
However, since the Applicants.have not, conducted._such a detailed analysis with regard to the i
\\
specific hypothetical conditions suggested by NRDC in
'/
Interrogatory No. 8,. which would appear to go beyond the
/
requirementa-of f these regulations, the Applicants cannot I
ffi '
r 1:
'2.
1-
- ~.
_t
T 9-
~.
speculate at this time as to what effect the imposition of these hypothetical conditions would have on their position with regard to proceeding with the CRBRP.
Interrogatory 9.
9.
If an LWA procedure is not issued for the CRBR but a
' construction permit is issued, when would you anticipate, on the present schedule, that construction could begin on the CRBR.
Provide in detail the factual and other assumptions used in reaching this conclusion.
Answer.
If the LWA procedure is not applied to CRBRP, but a construction permit is issued, the Applicants would anti-cipate that site preparation activities contemplated under an LWA would commence promptly after issuance of the construction permit.
Based upon the current NRC eiew schedule, and the assumptions set forth in NRC's memorandum to Harold R. Denton from Paul S. Check, dated October 13, 1981, site preparation activities would commence on May 1, 1984.
Document.
NRC Memorandum to Denton from Check, October 13, 1981.
4
. Interrogatory 10.
10.
Do you believe a delay in commencement of construction will adversely affect the Applicants.
If so, describe in detail the basis for this conclusion and relate the length of the delay to the alleged consequences.
Answer.
Construction activities (including site prepara-tion) are on the critical path of the CRBRP schedule.
In general, a delay in commencement of construction activities would delay completion of the proj ect and result in increased costs.
It is possible that minor delays in commencement of construction (or. the order of one month) can be accommodated without a resultant delay in proj ect comple-tion through the use of replanning and schedule refinements to optimize the construction schedule.
Delays of larger magnitude would result in unrecoverable delays in completion of the proj ect.
For purposes of qualitative assessment, increases in proj ect costs would result primarily from the following factors:
(a) increased managerial cost roughly proportional to the proj ect stretchout, (b) an increase in engineering, equipment, and construction costs due to higher prices caused by escalation, and (c) for those equipment procurements where the delivery schedule cannot be accom-modated in a stretched out schedule, increased storage facility and handling costs.
Proj ect cost estimates (See
l
- 11 Applicants' Statement of General Information) have applied an 8% (compounded annually) rate of escalation to the CRBR Plant investm en t.
Thus, if the schedules were stretched out, any expenditures which require postponement would escalate at an 8% compounded rate.
Interrogatory 11.
11.
Will a Congressional decision to appropriate less funds in a fiscal year than ERDA requests for the CRBR affect the schedule.
Explain the basis and disclose the assumptions for your answer.
Answer.
The amount of DOE annual requests for CRBRP fund-ing will be based on the difference between (1) the funding required to perform the applicable engineering, equipment procurement, construction, and support activities during the fiscal period in accordance with the overall project sche-dule; and (2) the planned availability of utility contribu-tions during the fiscal period.
A decision by Congress to appropriate less funds than DOE requests will therefore cause some work to be replanned to a later fiscal period.
Although minor shortages in funding might be accommodated without impacting the schedule for proj ect completion, there is a minimal degree of planning slack or flexibility in the proj ec t schedule.
Any significant shortage in appropriation
.. I would therefore cause proj ect activities for that period,
and all future periods, to be replanned on a prolonged schedule, with attendant cost increases (see paragraph 6a) above).
In te rrogatory 12.
12.
Describe the present financial arrangements between PMC and its members listing the financial commitment of each member and whether it has been paid.
List the documents which embody these financial arrangements.
Answer.
Proj ect Management Corporation is a nonprofit corporation which, pursuant to Agreement AT (49-18)-12
("Proj ect Agreement") among AEC, the Tennessee Valley Authority, Commonwealth Edison Company, and Proj ect Manage-ment Corporation, represents the interests of the utility participants in the CRBRP proj ect.
The terms of the Proj ect Agreement contemplate that CRBRP will be financed in part by a fixed contribution from more than 700 private, public, municipal, and cooperatively owned electric systems in the amount of more than $257 million in accordance with an agreement between PMC and Breeder Reactor Corporation (BRC) and an agreement between DOE and BRC.
The fixed contributions of the individual electric systems are made by execution and delivery of a Utility Contribution Agreement
13 -
acceptable to BRC.
The attached statement (Attachment E hereto) lists the electric systems that have executed and -
delivered a Utility Contribution Agreement to BRC and the amount of payment by each system as of March 31, 1975.
The documents which embody these financial arrangements are:
The Proj ect Agreement (Exhibit A to Applicants' Statement of General In fo rma tion).
The BRC/PMC Agreement (Exhibit C to Applicants' Statement of General In formation).
The BRC/ DOE Agreement (Exhibit D to Applicants' Statement of General Information).
Utility Contribution Agreement (Exhibit E to Applicants' Statement of General Information).
Interrogatory 13.
13.
To what extent is the present construction schedule for the CRBR dependent upon fulfillment of the financial obligations of the PMC members?
Answer.
As indicated in paragraph 7 above, the amount of DOE annual requests for CRBRP funding will be based upon the
. difference between (1) funding required to perform project activities, and (2) the availability of utility contribu-tions.
In the event that utility contributions were available in significantly less than the planned amounts, then either additional appropriations would be required to maintain the project schedule or delays and attendent cost increases would result (see paragraph 7 above).
Interrogatory 14 14.
What is the origin, and justification for the guideline values for bone and lung exposure used in the PSAR to determine whether 10 CFR 100 guidelines are met?
Answer.
The ortgin and justification for the guideline values for lung and bone exposure used in the CRBR PSAR are set forth in the CRBRP Site Suitability Report, Docket 50-537, March 4, 1977, Chapter III, Part D.
Interrogatory 15.
15.
What are the fuel cycle requirements and schedule for s
the CRBR?
In what quantities and when will PMC have to contract for plutonium, uranium, fuel fabrication, etc., for the CRBR?
~
. Answer.
Initial core loading in the CRBRP will consist of approximately 5.2 Metric Tons (MT) of uranium and plutonium metal.
With equilibriu loading the core contains 1.7 MT of r
plutonium metal and 3.5 MT of uranium metal.
There will be a total of 156 fuel assemblies in the reactor core.
An additional 25.8 MT of depleted uranium is con-tained in the inner radial and axial blankets.
Inner blankets contain about 8.3MT, and radial blankets contain about 12.7 MT of depleted uranium metal.
Each of the two axial blankets contains about 2 MT of depleted uranium
~
metal.
The total requirement of the plant could be as high as 27 MT of. plutonium metal and 336 MT of uranium.
However, it is expected that a large part of the burned fuel will be recycled to the plant after reprocessing and refabrication so that the actual heavy metal commitment to the plant from virgin ore (natural uranium) will be a fraction of the aforementioned values.
If the fuel cycle economics favor use of depleted rather than natural uranium, the virgin ore commitment for this plant would be elimi-nated.
If one assumes an idealized recycle with one full core load tied up in the reactor and an additional one-half core tied up in each end of the reprocessing-refabrication cycle, then the virgin heavy metal commitment is only on the w
~
. order of 2 cores (3.5 !!T of plutonium plus 15.4 MT of uranium) plus 2 inner blanket loads (16.6 MT of uranium) and 2 radial blanket loads (25.4 MT of uranium).
Uranium burnup and an assumed one percent heavy metal non-recovery for each batch through the reprocessing-refabrication cycle results in a plant lifetime total heavy metal commitment of 73.2 MT of uranium.
The 3.5 MT plutonium commitment does not increase since the plutonium burnup is more than made up by the reactor breeding.
An additional net of 2.3 MT of plutonium, in excess of that originally committed, is expected to be produced over the life of the plant.
At the time of decommissioning, 2.1 MT of plutonium and 28.1 MT of uranium can be recovered from the spent fuel and blanket in addition to the 3.7 MT of bred plutonium and 30,8 MT of uranium already removed, leaving a total irreversible consumption of uranium of about 14.3 MT and a net gain of 2.5 MT of bred plutonium.
Under paragraph 4.1.2 of the project agreement, DOE will supply the fuel for CRBRP.
The fuel rod and assembly fabricator will be the Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory.
The radial blanket fabricator selection is presently scheduled for March 1984.
Documents.
CRBRP Environmental Report, Docket 50-537, Sections 3.8, 3.2, and 5.8; Applicants' Statement of General
. Information pursuant to 10 CFR S 50.33 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Regulations; CRBRP PSAR, Chapter 4.3.
Interrogatory 16.
16.
What are the plutonium fuel requirements for other nuclear facilities, e.g., FFTF, that will draw from the same sources as the CRBR?
Answer.
The FFTF, with its associated research and development program, is the only nuclear facility that might draw plutonium from the same source as the CRBRP.
These annual requirements average about 0.6 metric tons per annum.
Documents DOE annual nuclear material forecasts.
Interrogatory 17.
17.
How much domestic and/or foreign plutonium is available to supply the CRBR and FFTF requirements?
How many FFTF and CRBR core loadings / refueling does this represent?
Interrogatory 18.
18.
Identify the size of the ERDA inventory and production capability of ERDA, if CRBR fuel requirements are to be drawn lfrom these sources.
e.
. Interrogatory 19.
19.
Identify all existing and potential commercial, domestic and foreign suppliers of plutonium fuel.
Identify the magnitude (and schedule) of the sources.
Answers 17, 18 and 19.
As a result of the Board's April 6, 1982 ruling and April 14, 1982 Order in regard to NRUC's Contention 17, the answers are not necessary.
Interrogatory 20.
20.
Identify all existing and potential mixed-oxide fuel fabricators.
Identify the capacity and schedule of these fuel fabricators.
Answer.
All fuel for the CRBR will be fabricated in the Secure Automated Fabrication (SAF) line to be installed in the Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) in Richland, Washington.
The SAF line and the FMEF are t
operated by the Westinghouse Hanford Company.
The SAF line has a design capacity of 6 metric tons of fuel per annum and will be operated consistent with supplying on the schedule required by the CRBR.
. Interrogatory 21, 21.
Identify all potential transportation paths for shipment of plutonium fuel from its source to the potential fuel fabricators and from there to the proposed CRBR site.
Answer.
The new fuel will be trucked over public roads and interstate systems.
The total number of shipments will be small compared to normally expected traffic density.
Documents.
CRBRP Environmental Report, Docket No. 50-537, Chapters 3.8, 5.7.1, and the submittal indentified in response to 23 below.
Proposed Final Environmental Impact Statement, LMFBR Program, WASH-1535, December 1974, Chapter.4.5.
Interrogatory 22.
22.
Identify the quantity and schedule of the proposed spent fuel shipbents of spent fuel from the CRBR.
Answer.
This information is provided in the ER Section 3.8.2.
Documents CRBRP Environmental Report, Docket No. 50-537, 3.8.
34
e f Interrogatory 23.
~<
52 3.
Identify all potential CRBR fuel reprocessing facilities.
Answer.
Potential CRBR fuel processing facilities are discussed in DOE memorandum, J.R. Longenecker to P.S. Check, HQ: E:82:012, Docket 50-537, "CRBRP Fuel Cycle", March 19, 1982.
Interrogatory 24.
24.
To the fullest extent possible, identify all potential transportation paths for shipment of plutonium spent fuel.
Answer.
The transportation routes for shipment of spent fuel have not been determined at this time.
Only surface transportation would be considered and, of these, rail or barge rail is most likely.
This is due to the fact that the spent fuel cask would weigh upwards of 70 tons, and for cask
- weights over about 35 tons, rail is the preferred transportation method.
Documents CRBRP Environmental Report, Docket No. 50 537, Section 3.R.
'e
- 21 Interrogatory 25.
25.
To the fullest extent possible, identify the quantity and schedule and transportation paths of high, intermediate and low level radioactive wastes associated with the CRBR or its supporting fuel cycle operations.
Answer.
This information is provided in the ER, section 5.7.1, and the submittal identified in response to 23 above.
1 G
G e
I 4
4 m
[
o ATTACHMENT A
\\
8 (3-3 9)
INTERROGATORY UPDATE DOCUMENT SEARCH D6TC TQZEBQM SUBJECT 4/14/76 R. S. Boy d, NRC/
Project Responses to Comments P.
S. Van Nort, PMC PMC Received by NRC on the CRBRP DES 4/14/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP Project-NRC Meeting, P.
S. Van Nort, PMC March 19, 1976, On Meteorology and
/0 X
4/22/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Third Level P.
S. Van Nort, PMC Thermal Margin Report 4/23/76 S.
H.
Norris, Sta te CRBRP Project's Response To G. G. Garabedian, PMC DES Comments 4/27/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Project Responses to Comments P. S. Van,Nort, PMC Received by NRC on the CRBRP DES 4/30/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Summary Of Meeting Held Between P.
S. Van Nort, PMC CRBRP Project and NRC To Discuss CRBRP Reliability Program and Related Documentation 5/13/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Amendment No. 19 L. W. Caffey, PMC 5/19/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Project Responses to Comments L. W. Caffey, PMC Received by NRC on the CRBRP DES 5/24/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Response to NRC Guidance on L. W. Caffey, PMC PMC CRBRP Licensing Approach 5/25/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP:
Additional Research L. W. Caffey, PMC and Development to Support the Project Core Disruptive Accident Analysis 5/28/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP:
Transmittal of Report L. W. Caffey, PMC on Fuel Penetration Models and Experiments 6/02/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Requested A.
R. Buhl, PMC Information (Transient Test Sum-mary Q l.284)
s 6/02/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Response to Question 001.540 A.
R. Buhl, PMC
- (Structual Design Margin) 6/09/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP:
Transmittal of Fuel A. R. Buhl, PMC Design Topical Reports 6/11/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of NOAA Supporting A.
R. Buhl, PMC CRBRP Requested X/Q Credit for Wird Meander 6/22/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
NRC Question 110.54 A.
R. Buhl, PMC 7/01/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Additional Information on the A. R. Buhl, PMC CRBRP Reactor Vessel Head Margin Shear Ring 7/07/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Requested A.
R. Buhl, PMC References 7/08/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/ '
Replacement Page for Reference A.
R. Buhl, PMC 001.284-1 7/14/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP Positions on HCDA and L. W.
Caffey, PMC Siting Policy 7/16/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Project Resolution of Wind A. R. Buhl, PMC Meander Factor for CRBRP 7/26/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
August 3 Meeting On CRBRP A.
R. Buhl, PMC Structural Response To HCDA'S 7/28/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Additional Information Supporting A. R. Buhl, PMC the CRBRP Assessment of Plant Margin in HCDA Mechanical Loading Condition 7/30/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Additional Information on A. R. Buhl, PMC CRBRP Features to Accommodate the Site Suitability Source Term 8/3/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Additional Information On A.
R. Buhl, PMC CRBRP Features To Accommodate The Site Suitability Source Term 8/06/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Requested A. R. Buhl, PMC Reference 8/12/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of REXCO Listing A. R. Buhl, PMC for 661 MJ SDB Case
. 8/12/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Clinch River Breeder Reactor A.
R. Buhl, PMC Plant Project:
Summary of the Jun 17 Meeting With The NRC Staff (TLTM) 8/20/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Requested A.
R. Buhl, PMC Reference (FLODISC-A) 8/27/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP Program for an A.
R. Buhl, PMC Alternative Fuel Management Scheme 9/01/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Clarification of May 6 Letter A.
R. Buhl, PMC 9/08/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Requested A.
R. Buhl, PMC Report (WARD-D-014 9) 9/08/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Clinch River Breeder Reactor A.
R. Buhl, PMC Plant Project:
Materials Properties used in CRBRP Analyses of the Reactor Vessel Head 9/17/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
NRC 1200 MJ HCDA Requirement L. W. Caffey, PMC 9/17/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP Site Suitability Source L. W.
Caffey, PMC Term 9/20/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Additional Information on Sub-A.
R. Buhl, PMC assembly Faults 9/20/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Environmental Qualification of A.
R. Buhl, PMC Safety Related Instrumentation 9/23/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Evaluations Of Events Beyond A.
R. Buhl, PMC The Design Basis 10/05/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Requested A.
R. Buhl, PMC Report 10/07/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Clinch River Breeder Reactor A.
R. Buhl, PMC Plant Project Commitment from September 22 Meeting with NRC on HCDA's 10/08/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Experimental A.
R. Buhl, PMC Information on Halogen Attenuation-and Fission Gas Bubble Breakup 10/21/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of the Ayer A.
R. Buhl, PMC
, Computer Code 9
o
-4_
10/27/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Commitments From August 3 A. R. Buhl,.PMC Meeting With NRC On CRBRP Structural Integrity Assessments 10/29/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Additional A. R. Buhl, PMC Information on SRI Scale Model Tests 11/02/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Resolution of CRBRP Site Suit-A. R. Buhl, PMC ability Source Term 11/04/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Sample Problems A. R. Buhl, PMC for the "AYER" Computer Code 11/05/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP Containment - 24 Hour A. R. Buhl, PMC Non-Venting Criteria 11/05/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Report - Fuel A.
R. Buhl, PMC Rod Bowing 11/05/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Issuance of the Final Environ-A.
R. Buhl, PMC mental Statement 11/05/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
NRC Request for Additional A. R. Buhl, PMC Information for Environmental Review of Alternative Sites for th0 CRBRP 11/18/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Meteorological A. R. Buhl, PMC Data and Project X/Q Values 11/18/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
NRC Request For Additional A. R.
Buhl, PMC Information For Environmental Review Of Alternative Sites For Th0 CRBRP 11/30/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Information on A. R. Buhl, PMC Industrial Security 12/01/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Information en Materials Com-A. R. Buhl, PMC patability Between Core Debris and Refractory Materials
=
12/07/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP Project CDA Analyses A.
R. Buhl, PMC 12/14/76 R. S.,Boyd, NRC/
HCDA Energetics A. R. Buhl, PMC j
12/17/76 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Report - Venus A. R. Buhl, PMC II 12/29/76 R. S. Boyd, NRC/.
Response to NRC Request for A. R. Buhl, PMC Additional Information
+--
1/03/77 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Requested A. R. Buhl, PMC Third Level Margin References 1/05/77 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of TLTM Input A. R. Buhl', PMC Listing 1/10/77 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Up-Date of Site A. R. Buhl, PMC Cost Comparison Studies - Clinch River, John Sevier, Widow's Creek 1/21/77 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
HCDA Energetics Meeting 1/25/77 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Requested Third A.
R. Buhl, PMC Level Thermal Margin References 2/03/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Suspension of HCDA Specialists A.
R.
Buhl, PMC Meetings At ANL 2/14/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Information On A.
R. Buhl, PMC Industrial Security 2/16/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Energetics Data A.
R. Buhl, PMC 2/18/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Response to NRC Question 422.3 A. R. Buhl, PMC (Evacuation) 3/11/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Corrected Pages To Topical A.
R. Buhl, PMC Report WARD-D-0141 3/14/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP Risk Assessment Report A.
R.
auhl, PMC 3/14/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Transmittal of Information On A.
R. Buhl, PMC Industrial Security 3/23/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP Component Fabrication A. R. Buhl, PMC 4/5/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Interactions Between CRBRP A. R. Buhl Operations and ORO Operations 4/07/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
SRI Test Scale Model Drawings A. R. Buhl, PMC 5/03/77 T.
E. Murley, NRC/
Comments on Paper Titled, "A A. R. Buhl, PMC Condensed Review Of The Technology Of-Post-Accident Heat Removal For The LMFBR" 5/03/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Summary of December 15 Meeting A. R. Buhl, PMC With NRC Staff To Discuss Reactor Vessel Clocure Head Structural Analysis
I
' 5/09/77 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Objections to Questions A.
R. Buhl, PMC Received Dated March 30, 1977 7/15/77 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Closure Head Capability A.
R. Buhl, PMC For Third Level Structural Margin Loading 7/18/77 R. J. Jones, NRC/
Considerations For Barrier A. R. Buhl, PMC Design and Placement 11/14/78 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Potential Industrial Developlaent R.
L. Copeland, PMC Adjacent To CRBRP Site 1/03/79 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
CRBRP Licensing Status L. W. Caffey, PMC 2/09/79 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Topical Report on Structural R.
L. Copeland, PMC Margin Beyond Design Base (SMBDB) 2/16/79 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Topical Reports on Loss of
~
R.
L., Copeland, PMC Heat Sink 2/16/79 R. S. Boyd, NRC/
Topical Report on HCDA's R.
L. Copeland, PMC 3/05/79 H.
R. Denton, NRC/
Project Evaluation of the NRC L. W.
Caffey, PMC Staff Review of CRBRP 3/08/79 L. W. Caffey, PMC/
Use of WASH-1400 in CRBR H.
R.
Denton, NRC Licensing Review 3/30/79 D.
E. Weigel, GAO/
Information transmitted as a resulf W.
F. Rolf, PMC of meeting at CRBRP Project Office on March 21 6/01/79 R.
S. Boyd, NRC/
Updated Information on R.
L. Copeland, PMC Industrial Security 6/13/79 D.
E. Weigel, GAO/
. Letter Concerning the IHX Design W.
F. Rolf, PMC Decisions on the CRBRP 6/26/79 C.
Fowler, GAO/
Transmittal of Information on our W.
F. Rolf, PMC Analysis of the Potential Pay Back for the CRBRP Project 12/14/79 D.
B. Vassallo, NRC/
Topical Report on CRBRP's R.
L. Copeland, PMC Thermal-Hydraulic Performance 2/04/80 T.
R. Kuhn, NRC/
Report of Non Proliferation W.
F. Rolf, PMC Alternative Systems Assessment Program, DOE /NE-001, December 1979 2/27/80 D.
B. Vassallo, NRC/
Commitment to Implement L. W. Caffey, PMC Requirements of NUREG-0578
i 3/11/80 D. B. Vassallo, NRC/
Topical Report on R. L. Copeland, PMC CRBRP's Predicted Steady State Thermal-Hydraulic Performance 3/25/80 D. B. Vassallo, NRC/
Topical Report on Thermal R. L. Copeland, PMC Margin Beyond the Design Base (TMBDB) 4/04/80 D. V. Vassallo, NRC/
Topical Report on Base Materials R. L. Copeland, PMC Tests for Cell Liner Steels 4/11/80 D.'F. Ross, NRC/
Topical Report on CRBRP Scale R. L. Copeland, PMC Model Response to a Simulated HCDA 6/27/80 H. R. Denton NRC/
Transmittal of Information on e
R.1L. Copelana, PMC Industrial Security 7/11/80 C. Fowler, GAO/
List...Concerning Nuclear Fuel and Breeders 8/22/80 D. G.
Eisenhut, NRC/
Transmittal of Topical Report R. L. Copeland, PMC 11/28/80 D. G. Eisenhut, NRC/
Pre-Test Prediction of FFTF R.
L. Copeland, PMC Natural Circulation 11/13/81 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Transmittal of Rev. 1 and Rev.
R. L. Copeland, PMC 2 of CRBRP-3, " Hypothetical Cor.e Disruptive Accident Considerations in CRBRP; Assessment of Thermal Margin Beyond the Design Base" 11/13/81 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Responses to NRC Questions R. L. Copeland, PMC 11/19/81 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Transmittal of Information on R. L. Copeland, PMC Industrial Security 11/27/81 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Responses to NRC Questions R. L. Copeland, PMC 12/22/81 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Responses to NRC Questions J. R. Longenecker, DOE 12/28/81 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Response to NRC Question 451.1 J. R. Longenecker, DOE 1/22/82 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Response to NRC Questions J. R. Longenecker, DOE 2/05/82 P.
S. Check, NRC/
_ Response to Request for Additional' J. R. Longenecker, DOE Environmental Information m
. 2/12/82 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Response to Request for Alternativ J. R. Longenecker, DOE Sites Information 2/1 9/ 82 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Transmittal of Information - Core DOE Energetics J.
R. Longeneckerr 2/19/82 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Summary Report ~on the Conduct of J. R. Longenecker, DOE the CRBRP Key System Reviews 3/12/82 P. S. Check,' NRC/
CRBRP Fuel Cycle J. R. Longenecker, DOE 3/17/ 82 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Responses to Request for Additiona)
J.
R. Longenecker, DOE Information - ALARA 3/19/82 P.
S. Check, NRC/
CRBRP Fuel Cycle J.
R. Longenecker, DOE 3/22/82 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Transmittal of Revision 3 of CRBRP:
J.* R. Longenecker, DOE 3, Volume 2, " Hypothetical Core Disruptive Accident Considerations' in CRBRP; Assessment of Thermal Margin Beyond the Design Base" (TMBDB) 3/24/82 P.
S. Check, NRC/
CRBRP Fuel Cycle Safeguards Costs J. R. Longenecker, DOE 3/ 25/82 P. Boehnert, NRC/
Review Topics for Advisory Com-J.
R. Longenecker, DOE mittee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)
CRBRP Subcommittee 3/29/82 P.
S. Check, NRC/
Transmittal of Information J.
R. Longenecker 4
ATTACHMENT B From/To O
Date Subj@ct N
Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC March 24, 1982 CRBRP Fuel Cycle Safeguards Cost Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC March 19, 1982 CRBRP Fuel Cycle Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC March 19, 1982 CRBRP Fuel Cycle Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC February 12, 1982 Response to Request for Alternate Site Information Longenecker, DOE /Denton,NRC February 11, 1982 Affidavit confirming dis-tribution of Amendment No.
XII to the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Envi'ronmental Report Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC February 5, 1982 Response to Request for Additional Environmental Information Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC January 29, 1982 Amendment No. XII to the Environmental Report for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC January 29, 1982 Request for additional information for CRBRP Environ-mental Review v
h t
a
~. -
?,
j From/To Date Subjecte Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC December 18, 1981 Transmittal of CRBRP PSAR Amendbent No. 63 Longenecker, DOE /Boehment,NRC April 19, 1982 Proposed Agenda for May 4 and 5, 1982 Meeting on i
Initiation Phase of HCDA's i
Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC Apri'l 20, 1982 Transmittal of the Revised CRBRP - 3, Vol. 1, "Hyoo-thetical Core Disruptive i
Acci6ent Considerations in CRBR Energetics and Structural Margin beyond the Design Basi's Longenecker, DOE /Boehment,NRC March 25, 1982 Review Topics for Advisory Committee on Reactor Safe-guards (ACRS) Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP)
Subcommittee Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC January 28, 1982 Request for additional information - 0290.llR Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC January 22, 1982 Response to NRC questions Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC January 8, 1982 Amendment No. XI to the l
Environmental Report of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant I
l
_ Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC December 28, 1981 Response to NRC Question 451.1 i
i-A e
4
F, rom /To Datn Subjech l
Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC December 22, 1981 Response to NRC Questions 1
Longenecker, DOE /Denton,NRC December 21, 1981 Affidavit confirming Distribution of Amendment I
No. X to the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant l
Environmental Report lj Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC March 29, 1982 Transmittal of Information Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC March 31, 1982 Amendment No. 67 to the CRBRP PSAR l
~i Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC March 22, 1982 Transmittal of Rev. 3 CRBRP-3 Vol.
2.
i Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC March 17, 1983 Response to request for f
additional information - ALARA t
Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC March 17, 1982 Amendment No. 66 to the CRBRP PSAR l
Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC February 19, 1982 Transmittal of Information Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC February 19, 1982 Summary Report on the Conduct of CRBRP Key System Reviews
]
Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC February 28, 1982 Amendment No. 65 to CRBRP PSAR Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC January 25, 1982 Amendment No. 64 to the PSAR for CRBRP Longenecker, DOE / Check,NRC January 8, 1982 Report Transmittal, Assessment of HCDA Energetics in CRBRP Heterogeneous Reactor Core (CRBRP-GEFR-00523) l L.
f' From/To Data
- Subicct, i I i
Beckjord, DOE / Subcommittee on July 1, 1977 Environmental and Safety Matte 0 A
l Nuclear Regulation of the Committee on Environment and Public Works j
l Dillon, DOE /Howard,USGAO June 24, 1981 Cost and schedule information (alternative site)
I Meyers, DOE / Committee on Science March 22,1978 Fuel cycle i
and Technology i
j Stern, DOE /Cahill, EPA December 13, 1981 Draft Supplemental EIS Brewer, DOE / Colleague (Service December 17, 1981 Draft Supplemental EIS List)
Copeland, CRBRP Project Office /Boyd May 24, 1978 Response on Licensing Issues 1
W
1 i
ATTACHMEITT C Interrogatory Set 1, Question 7 - Updated Response I
International Energy Associates Limited, " Sabotage i
Analysis for DOE Facilities", Phase II, Volume I, January 1982.
International Energy Associates Limited, " Sabotage Analysis for DOE Facilities", Phase II, Volume II Appendices, January 1982.
Advanced Technnlogy Associates, Inc., (Robert K.
Mullen, Ph.D), " Potential Saboteurs To DOE Programs:
Attributes and Inferences", September 1980.
The BDM Corporation (M. K. Pilgrim, M. L. Fineberg, R. S. Ely, M. A. Smith, and R. W. Mengel), " Development of Deterrence Strategies", September 1981.
The BDM Corporation (Michael K. Pilgrim and R. William Mengel), " Handbook for Development of Deterrence Strategies",
September 1981.
Decisions and Designs, Inc., and International Energy Associates, Ltd., " Development of Cost-Effectiveness Model for Safeguards:
Model Development and Generalization", June 1981.
Decisions and Designs, Inc., and International Energy Associates, Ltd., " Development of Cost Effectiveness Model for Safeguards", May 1981.
Decisions and Designs, Inc., and International Energy Associates, Ltd., " Development of Cost-Effectiveness Model for Safeguards:
Continued Model Development and Software Description", September 1981.
Gail Bass, Brian Jenkins, Konrad Kellen, Joseph Krofcheck, Geraldine Petty, Robert Reinstedt, and David Ronfeldt, "Motiva-tions and Possible Actions of Potential Criminal Adversaries of U.S. Nuclear Porgrams", February 1980.
Peter deLeon, Brian Jenkins, Konrad Kellen, and Joseph Krofcheck, " Attributes of Potential Criminal Adversaries of U.S. Nuclear Programs", February 1978.
-2 ATTACHMENT C Final Evnironmental Statement, Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Program, ERDA-1535, Dec. 1975.
Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Supplement to ERDA-1535, DOE /EIS-0085-D, Dec. 1981.
Draft Fnvironmental Statement related to construction of the CRBRP, Proj ect Management Corporation and T.V. A.
NUREG-0024, Feb. 1976.
Final Environmental Statement Related to the Construction and Operation of the CRBRP, NUREG-0139, Feb. 1977.
Safeguarding a Domestic Mixed-Oxide Industry Against a Hypothetical Subnational Threat, NUREG-0414, May 1978.
Reg. Guide 5.52 Reg. Guide 5.55 The White Collar Challenge to Nuclear Safeguards, NUREG-0156, Jan. 1977.
2 Cordes, B.
J.,
and Petty, G., " Chronology of Actions Against Non-Nuclear Energy Programs in the United States and Abroad," Sandia Lab. Working Draft 1264-SL, Oct. 1981.
Ronfeldt, David, and Sater, W., "The Mindsets of High-Technology Terrorists:
Future Implications from an Historical Analog," Rand Note, N-1610-SL, March 1981.
Sater, W., " Puerto Rican Terrorists:
A Possible Threat to U.S. Energy Installations?" Rand Note, N-1764-SL, Oct. 1981.
V t
1 j
\\
^
ATTACHMENT D CRBRP CORRESPONDENCE LTR. NO.
DATE SUBJECT FROM-TO BD 60864 12/15/76 Industrial Security Design Criteria.
Brolin to Riley CSM 697 12/29/76 Clear Zones Riley to Brolin Bd 70143 2/11/77 CRBRP Industrial Security Criteria Hellerung to Riley BD 70165 2/16/77 CRBRP:
Indus' trial' Security System Response
-!!clierung to Riley/.
~
Caffey EN 1577.007,,
5/7/77 A&C Industrial Sdcurity criteria ~
Riley to Brolin J
EN 1577008' 3/10/77 Security Hardware Meeting Riley to Brolin EB 70140.
5/2/77 Implementation of Industrial Security Hess to Aneja Criteria EN 1577019 6/1/77 Pre CCB Meeting on Industrial Security Penico to Multiple Memo 1080 6/20/78 Summary of RC10-005 Industrial Security Penico to Riley System BD 81102 11/10/78 ECP for Changes to Security System B&R to PO EN 1579019 1/4/80 Forwarding of A&Cs on Security System PO to BER EN 1579019 1/4/80 Forwarding A&Cs Concerning Security System PO to B&R ICT 80434 12/31/80 Discussed Ups for Security System PO to BER PR 81184 2/25/81 Award of Security System Contract PO to B&R BP 10926 7/14/81 Forwards Changes to Security System, VIZ:
Ascher to Riley Delete Glare Lights, Identifies Heat Load for HVAC RPS 81521 10/1/81 Gives Guidance on Procurement Actions / task PO to B&R B&R to Investigate Access Control Booth CM 82-034 2/8/82 Approval of SDD18 Ups U/H/BER
ATTACHMENT D CRBRP ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 1.
System Design Description 18
" Radiological Security System" With 11 revisions, last revision dated 12/81 in five parts, all parts except Section 1 are safeguards information in accordance with 10 C.F.R. Part 73, Secticn 21.
2.
10 C.F.R. Part 11; Part 25; Part 50 (these applicable Paragraphs, 34(c), 34(d), 34(e); Part 70 (Paragraph 20a);
Part 73 (these applicable Sections, 20, 21, 25, 26, 45, 46, 55, 71, 72, 80.
Appendices B and C); and Part 95 for applicable documents.
3.
All appropriate SANDIA handbooks on Security System, E.G. Intrusion Detection System handbook SAND 76-0554 SANDIA, Nov. '76 as revised.
1 6
0 e
9
=
ATTACHIENT E
~
BREE0ER REACTOR CORPORATION UTILITIES WHICH HAVE EXECUTED A CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT, LETTER OF INTENT, OR CONTRIBUTED CASH IN SUPPORT OF THE LMF8R DEMONSTRATION PLANT PROJECT AS OF MARCH 31. 1982 CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS PLEOGES RECEIVE 0*
Accomack-Northampton Elec. Coop. (Va.)
8,746.05 8
4,373 Adams-Herquette Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
10,087.29 5,043 Aiken Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
29,500.00 14,750 Alabama Power Co.
4,619,132.00 2,309,566 Alger Delta Coop. Elec. Assn. (Mich.)
4,586.34 2,293 AtLamakee-Clayton Elec. Coop., Inc. (Ia. ]
16,403.23 8,201 Allegheny Elec. Coop., Inc. (Pa.)
205,700.59 102,825 Anza Elec. Coop., Inc. (Cat.)
1,279.34 640 Arizona Elec. Power Coop., Inc.
122,046.10 61,023 Arizone Public Service Co.
1,250,000.00 625,000 Ark Valley Elec. Coop. Assn., Inc. [Kan.)
13,051.47 6,526 Arkansas-Missouri Power Co.
233,000.00 116,500 Arkansas Power & Light Co.
2,188,446.30 1,094,223 Arkansas Valley Elec. Coop. Corp.
24,662.80 12,331 Arrowhead Elec. Coop., Inc. (Minn.)
1,773.67 887 Ashley-Chicot Elec. Coop. (Ark.)
5,065.00 1,013 Atlantic City Electric Co.
884,460.00 442,230 Baker Elec. Coop., Inc. (N.D.)
11,986.00 5,993 l
Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.
2,977,720.00 1,488,860 l
~
Barron Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
15,000.00-7,500
- Amounts rounded to nearest dotLar.
Total rounding error $20.
l Cont ribution Aoreaments (continuedl Pledae
_ Received Beltrami Elec. Coop., Inc. (Minn.)
11,102.90 5,552 Benton REA (Wash.)
24,600.00 12,300 l
Berkeley Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
39,709.00 19,854 Big Bend Elec. Coop., Inc. (Wash.)
17,500.00 8,750 BLachly-Lane County Coop. Elec. Assn. (Ore.)
17,700.00 8,850 Black River Elec. Coop. (Mo.)
19,942.22 9,971 Black River Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
20,150.23 10,075 Blue Ridge EMC (N.C.)
83,000.00 41,500 Boston Edison Company 1,740,000.00 870,000 Brazos Elec. Power Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
215,165.80 107,583 i
Brown-Atchison Elec. Coop. Assn., Inc. (Kan.)
6,250.00 3,125 Buckeye Power, Inc. [ Ohio) 421,172.00 190,158 Buffalo Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
9,151.83 4,576 Burke-Divide Elec. Coop., Inc. (N.O.)
8,349.55 4,175 i
Butler REC Assn., Inc. (Kan.)
9,554.93 4,778 C.
& W.
REC Assn., Inc. (Kan.)
6,456.00 3,228 California-Pacific Utilities Co.
110,000.00 55,000 CatLaway Elec. Coop (Mo.)
6,431.70 3,216 Canadian Valley Elec. Coop., Inc. (Okla.)
20,335.40 10,168 Capital Electric Coop., Inc. (N.O.)
725.00 363 Carolina Power & Light Co.
3,450,000.00 1,725,000 CerrolL EMC (Ga.)
24,315.00 12,158 Carroll Elec. Coop. Corp. (Ark.)
28,978.00 14,489 Corteret-Craven EMC (N.C.)
17,779.00 8,890 Cavalier REC, Inc. (N.D.)
8,160.00 4,080 I
l l
Contribution Aaremments (continuedl Pladne Received Cedar Valley Elec. Coop. (Ia.)
9,280.00 4,640 Central Alabama Elec. Coop.
23,380.00 11,690 Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Co.
677,800.00 338,900 Central ItLinois Light Co.
676,000.00 338,000 Central ItLinois Public Service Co.
1,070,000.00 535,000 Central Kansas Elec. Coop., Inc.
30,750.00 15,375 Central Lincoln People's Utility District (Ore.)
100,000.00 50,000 Central Power & Light Co.
1,824,000.00 912,000 Central Wisconsin Elec. Coop.
4,933.00 2,467 Cheyenne Light, Fuel & Power Co.
60,000.00 30,000 Chippewa Valley Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
8,850.00 4,425 O
Choctawhatchee Elec. Coop., Inc. (Fla.)
23,824.50 11,912 Chaptank Elec. Coop., Inc. (Md.)
35,560.00 17,780 The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.
2,353,000.00 1,176,500 Citizens' Electric Co.
16,649.00 8,325 City of Potey, Utilities Board of The (Ala.)
26,705.80 13,353 City of Forest Grove (Ore.)
23,150.00 11,575 l
City of Fort Collins (Colo.)
45,820.00 22,910 City of Idaho FatLa (Idaho) 52,900.00 26,450 l
City of McPherson, Kansas, Board of PubLic Utilities 33,014.00 9,904 i
City of Richland (Wash.)
71,680.00 35,840 City of Seattle, Dept. of Lighting 1,600,000.00 800,000 Claiborne Elec. Coop., Inc. (La.)
18,259.89 9,130 Clark Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
15,578.00 7,789 Clay Elec. Coop., Inc. (Fla.)
75,055.56 37,528
5 r
I
.w-
......~.......
.---~c e
i j
-4_
Contribution Aareaments (continuedl Ptedae Received Clay Elec. Coop., Inc. (ItL.)
9,370.00 4,685 Clearwater-Polk Elec. Coop., Inc. (Minn.)
4,684.60 2,342 Clearwater Power Co. (Idaho) 22,040.00 1,,1,020 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
3,413,000.00 1,706,500 Coast Elec. Power Assn. (Miss.)
38,963.22 19,482 Coastal Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
6,896.14 3,448 Codington-Clark Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.D.)
7,126.60 3,563 Columbia REA, Inc. (Wash.)
21,510$00 10,755 Columbus REC (Wis.)
6,638.73 3,319 Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co.
1,425,600.00 712,800 Commonwealth Edison Co.
11,414,200.00 5,707,100 The CMS Elec. Coop., Inc. (Kan.)
5,609.00 2,805 Concordia Elec. Cocp., Inc. (La.)
17,299.69 8,650 Consolidated Edison Co. of N.
Y.,
Inc.
7,981,000.00 3,990,500 Cosumers Power Co.
4,548,888.00 2,274,444 Cosumers Power, Inc. (Ore.)
39,650.00 19,825 The Cooperative L & P Assn. of Lake County (Minn.)
3,646.00 1,823 Cooperative Power Assn. (Minn.)
275,320.00 137,660 Coo s-Cu r ry Elec. Coo p., Inc. (Ore.)
42,318.00 21,159 Cotton Elec. Coop., Inc. (Okla.)
47,500.00 23,750 e
Cowlitz County PUD #1 (Wash.)
294,150.00 147,075 Craighead Elec. Coop. Corp. (Ark.)
28,260.00 14,130 Crawford Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
5,667.00 2,834 Cuivre River Elec. Coop., Inc. (Mo.)
14,928.45 7,464 DatLas Power & Light Co.
1,965,800.00 982,900
Contribution Aornaments (continuedl Plados Received i
The Dayton Power & Light Co.
1,839,954.00 819,977 D.E.K. REC (Iowa) 9,449.98 4,725 The Detroit Edison Co.
6,920,000'.00 3,460,000 Delmarve Power & Light Co.
1,148,000.00 574,000 Dixie EMC (La.)
45,000.00 22,500 Douglas Elec. Coop., Inc. (Ore.)
17,324.00 8,662 D.S.&O. REC Assn., Inc. (Kan.)
9,648.00 2,894 Duke Power Co.
7,235,650.00 3,617,825 Dunn County Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
11,873.50 5,937 East Central Okla. Elec. Coop., Inc.
28,523.00 14,263 East Kentucky Power Coop. (See Appendix A) 333,082.00 166,541 Eastern Illinois Power Coop.
19,713.27 9,857 Eastern Utilities Associates (See Appendix B) 552,500.00 276,250 The Easton Utilities Comm. (Md.)
15,690.00 7,845 Eau Clai re Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
11,561.84 5,7 81 Edison Sault Elec.-Co.
10,000.00 6,000 EL Paso Electric co.
518,600.00 259,300 The Empi re District Electric Co.
308,000.00 133,000 Estes Park, Town of (Colo.)
4,748.40 2,374 Eugene Water & Electric Board (Ore.)
358,390.00 143,356 Fai rfield Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
12,834.51 6,417 Farmers Mutual Elec. Co. (ILL.)
1,930.00 965 First Elec. Coop. Corp. (Ark.)
59,150.00 29,575 Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Co.
66,320.00 33,160 I
Flathead Elec. Coop.,, Inc. (Mont.)
11,869.00 5,935 Flint Hitla REC Assn. lKan.)
13,500.00 6,750 t
i
i Contribution Aorsements (continuedl Ptedae Received Florida Power Corp.
1,944,282.00 972,141 Four County EMC (N.C.)
25,592.00 12,796 Franklin REC (Iowa) 6,258.90 3,129 Freeborn-Mower Elec. Coop. (Minn.)
17,632.00 8,816 Fruit Belt Elec. Coop. (Mich.)
32,619.15 13,048 Georgia Power Co.
5,927,757.00 2,963,879 Golden Valley Elec. Assn., Inc. (Alaska) 10,000.00 5,000 Grand Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.D.)
8,262.60 4,131 Grant Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
14,040.00 7,020 Great Plaines Elec. Coop., Inc. (Kan.)
5,539.40 2,770 f
Grundy County REC (Iowa) 7,750.00 3,875 Gulf Power Co.
766,404.00 383,202 Gulf States Utilities Co.
3,210,000.00 1,510,000 Halifax EMC (N.C.)
7,349.00 3,674
[
Hardin County REC (Iowa) 9,401.27 4,701 i
Harrison REA, Inc. (W. Va.)
2,949.00 1,475 i
Hart County EMC (Ga.)
24,596.00 12,298 Hawkeye Tri-County Elec. Coop., Inc.
15,575.75 4,673 i
Hershey Electric Co.
56,777.00 28,389 Home Light & Power Co.
63,7C0.00 15,000 Hood River Elec. Coop. (Ore.)
13,100.00 6,550 Harry Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
17,227.20 8,614 Houston Lighting & Power co.
5,620,000.CC 2,810,000 Howard Elec. Coop. (Mo.)
2,784.00 1,382 Humboldt County REC [ Iowa) 6,457.70 3,229 Idaho Power Co.
1,485,981.00 594,392
)
)
. Contribution Aorsements (continued)
Ptedom Received ILLini Elec. Coop. (ItL.)
9,029.35 4,515 ItLinois Power Company 1,993,200.00 996,600 Illinois Rural Elec. Co.
16,357.70 8,179 Indianapolis Power & Light Co.
1,433,000.00 716,500 Inland Power & Light Co. (Wash.)
47,800.85 23,900 Interstate Power Co.
509,200.00 254,600 Iowa Electric Light & Power Co.
580,000.00 232,000 Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Company 610,700.00 305,350 Iowa Power & Light Co.
678,404.00 339,202 Iowa PubLic Service Co.
408,690.00 204,345 i
Iowa Southern Utilities Co.
242,680.00 121,340 i
Jackson County REMC (Ind.)
24,420.00 12,210 j
i Jackson Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
6,784.50 3,392
[
James VetLey Elec. Coop., Inc. [N.O.)
5,000.00 2,500 l
Jesper-Newton Elec. Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
20,126.00 10,063 Jeffersen Davis Elec. Coop., Inc. (La.]
17,643.80 8,821 Jersey Central Power & Light Co.
1,430,077.00 715,039 l
Jones-Onslow EMC (N.C.)
37,415.20 18,708 Jump River Elec. Coop., Inc. (Wis.)
6,285.00 3,143 f
i Kansas Gas & Electric Co.
889,254.00 444,628 l
Kenses Power & Light Co.
943,000.00 377,200 l
Kew VelLey Elec. Coop. Co., Inc. (Kan.)
8,017.20 4,009 Key Elec. Coop. (Okle.)
15,680.00 7,840 l
l Kosciusko County REMC (Ind.)
15,080.00 7,540 I
Lake Superior District Power Co. (Wisc.)
101,220.00 50,610 Lamar EMC (Ga.)
9,841.30 4,921 i
- ~ a.i............ -
o_..
. Contribution Acreoments (continuedl Pledgg_
Received f
Lane Elec. Coop., Inc. (Ore.)
43,010.00 21,505 Lene-Scott Elec. Coop., Inc. (Kan.)
4,985.50 2,493
~
Laurens Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
24,764.60 12,382 Lee County Elec. Coop., Inc. [Fla.)
74,550.00 37,275 t
Lighthouse Elec. Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
19,180.00 9,590 The Little Ocmulges EMC (Ga.]
10,490.00 5,245 Little River Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
9,524.79 4,762 Lone Wolf Elec. Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
4,228.76 2,114 j
Long Island Lighting Co.
2,457,500.00 1,228,750 Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power (One year agreement subj ect to annual Board approvat}
4,000,000.00 800,000 Lost River Elec. Coop., Inc. (Idaho) 4,100.00 2,050 Louisiana Power & Light Co.
2,141,193.50 1,070,597 Lower Valley Power & Light, Inc. (Wy.)
21,270.00 10,635 l
Lynches River Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
14,331.26 7,166 Lynteger Elec. Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
32,905.60 16,453 Madison Gas & Electric Co.
292,580.00 146,290 Metenuska Elec. Assn., Inc. (Alaska) 12,000.00 6,000 McCleary Light & Power (Wash.)
6,340.00 3,170 McDonough Power Coop. (ItL.)
8,980.00 4,490 Mecklenburg Elec. Coop. (Va.)
29,766.78 14,883 Menerd Elec. Coop. (ItL.)
13,572.50 6,786 i
Metropoliten Edison Co.
1,521,469.00 760,735 Mid-Corolina Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
20,896.22 10,448 Midstate Elec. Coop., Inc. (Ore.)
14,320.00 7,160 l
I Midwest Elec. Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
13,842.97 6,921 1
. i Contribution Aorsements (continued)
Pledoe Received Minnesota Power & Light Co.
841,200.00 420,600 Mississippi Power Co.
896,921.00 448,461 Mississippi Power & Light Co.
1,089,380.00 544,690 Missoula Elec. Coop., Inc. (Mont.)
8,860.00 4,430 Monroe County Elec. Coop., Inc. (ILL.)
6,923.80 3,462 Montans-Dakota Utilities Co.
222,150.00 111,075 Mor-Gran-Sou Elec. Coop., Inc. (N.D.)
9,924.25 4,962 Mt. Camel PubLic Utility Co.
18,877.62 9,439 Mountrail Elec. Coop., Inc. (N.O.)
7,845.26 3,923 N.C.K.
Elec. Coop., Inc. (Kan.)
6,666.00 3,333 Nebraska Elec. G. & T. Coop., Inc.
286,910.00 143,455 Nebraska Public Power District 272,982.25 136,491 The Nemaha-Marshall Elec. Coop. Assn. (Kan.)
6,700.00 3,350 Nespelem Valley Elec. Coop., Inc. (Wash.)
4,983.00 2,492 i
New England Gas & Electric Assn.
524,510.00 262,255 New England Power Co.
2,727,830.00 1,363,915 New Jersey Power & Light Co.
572,892.00 286,446 New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
895,265.70 447,633 New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
1,825,000.00 912,500 Newport Electric Corp.
86,795.00 43,398 Niagara Mohawk Power Co.
5,000,000.00 2,500,000 Nodak REC, Inc. (N.O.)
49,915.96 24,958 North Arkanses Elec. Coop., Inc.
26,678.61 13,339 North Star Elec. Coop., Inc. (Minn.)
5,420.00 2,710 Northeast Louisiana Power Coop., Inc.
17,149.30 8,575 Northeast Missouri Elec. Power Coop.
67,510.00 33,755 i
. l Gontributi2n Agrgaments_(continuedl Pledga_
_Rslaived..
.\\
Northeast Oklahoma Elec. Coop., Inc.
21,208.00 10,604 Northeast Utilities Service Co.
3,510,560.00 1,755,280 Northern Lights, Inc. (Idaho) 14,500.00 7,250 Northearn Michigan Elec. Coop.,'Inc.
52,973.50
,26,487 Northearn Neck Elec. Coop. (Va.]
11,667.80 5,834 Northern Piedmont Elec. Coop. (Va.)
15,386.00 7,693 Northern States Power Co.
3,540,000.00 1,770,000 Northwest Iowa Power Coop.
73,172.22 36,586 N. W.
Elec. Power Coop., Inc. (Mo.)
84,870.00 42,435 Northwestern PubLic Service Co.
125,000.00 62,500 Dakdale Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
13,361.00 6,681 The Oconee EMC (Ga.)
13,293.20 6,647 Oconto Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
8,340.30 4,170 Ohio Edison Co.
3,326,000.00 1,663,000 Oli ver-Merce r Elec. Coop., Inc. [N.O.)
5,256.19 2,628 Oklahoma Elec. Coop.
24,628.00 12,314 Omaha PubLic Power District (Neb.)
865,095.00 346,040 Orange and RockLand Utilities, Inc.
543,800.00 271,900 Osage Valley Elec. Coop. Assn. (Mo.)
15,260.00 15,260 0tter Trait Power Co.
276,672.00 138,336 l
Quachita Elec. Coop., Corp. (Arh.)
12,051.00 6,026 1
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
10,121,077.00 5,060,539 l
Paci fic Power & Light Co.
3,060,000.00 1,530,000 Palmetto Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
15,312.00 7,656 Podernates Elec. Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
55,097.10 22,039 l
Pee Dee EMC (N.C.)
16,910.00 8,455 l
.r.
w.~.
..... - ~..... -.
\\'
N
. gi.
.N 4
\\
t 1
fcont nuedl P.Ly d.g q_
_Receivgd_
i 9_qntribution Aareemgnts Pennsylvania Electric Co.
1,820,035.'00 910,018 636,000.00 318,000 Pennsylvania Power Co.
.\\.
\\
Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.
3,600,000.00 1,800,000 Peopta's Coop. Power Assn., Inc. ( M i n n.')
23,941.10 11,971 6
Philadelphia Electric Co.
5,681,900.00 2,840,950 P.K.M. Elec. Coop., Inc. (Minn.)
7,675.00 3,838 Planters EMC (Ga.]
15,480.00 7,740 Plumas-Sierra REC, Inc. (Cal.)
7,153.,44 3,577 Pocahontas REC (Iowa) 8,286.10 4,143 Polk Burnett Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
12,516.70 6,258 Portland General Electric Co.
2,193,400.00 1,096,700 Potor.sc Electric Power Co.
2,890,000.00 1,445,000 Price Elec.' Coop., Inc. (Wis.)
4,787.30 2,394 The R.P.&W. Etoc. Coop. Assn., Inc. (Kan.)
3,964.30 1,982 Public Service Co. of Colorado 1,670,000.00 835,000 Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc.
2,276,120.00 1,138,060 Public Service Co. of New Hampshire 709,650.00 354,825 Public Service Co. of Oklahoma 1,279,000.00 639,500 Public Service Electric & Gas Co.
6,254,934.00 3,127,467 PUD #1 of Chetan County (Wash.)
112,640.00 56,320 PUD #1 of Clark County (Wash.)
350,590.53 175,295 PUD #1 of Dougtes County (Wash.)
36,750.00 18,375 PUD #1 of Franklin County (Wash.)
70,700.00 35,350 i
PUD #1 of Grays Harbor County (Wash.)
192,090.00 96,045 PUD #1 of Kittitas County (Wash.)
5,980.00 2,990 PUD #1 of Klickitat County (Wash.)
29,950.00 14,975
l Cpntribution Aarggmanis (continuedl Pte(as_
_R.eceived PUD #1 of Lewis County (Wash.)
76,060.00 38,030 PUD #1 of Pend DreilLe County (Wash.)
5,000.00 2,500 PUD #1 of Snohomish County (Wash.)
739,960.00 369,980 PUD #2 of Grant County (Wash.)
161,690.00 80,845 PUD #2 of Pacific County (Wash.)
3,934.00 1,967 PUD #3 of Mason County (Wash.)
51,900.00 25,950 Puget Sound Power & Light Co.
1,835,438.00 917,719 Radiant Elec. Coop., Inc. (Kan.)
7,425.00 3,713 Randolph EMC Corp. (N.C.)
22,723'.59 11,362 The RayLe EMC (Ga.)
14,823.42 7,41 2 Red Lake Elec. Coop., Inc. (Minn.)
8,205.54 4,103 Red River Valley Coop. Power Assn. (Minn.)
10,112.78 5,056 Riceland Elec. Coop., Inc. (Ark.)
5,318.10 2,659 Rich Mountain Elec. Coop., Inc. (Ark.)
5,000.00 2,500 Roanoke EMC (N.C.)
12,807.91 6,404 Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp.
950,000.00 475,000 Roseau Elec. Coop., Inc. (Minn.)
6,330.00 3,165 R.S.R.
Elec. Coop., Inc. (N.D.)
3,500.00 2,250 St. Croix County Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
'11,014.30 5,507 St. Joseph Light & Power Co.
171,110.00 85,555 Salmon River Elec. Coop., Inc. (Idaho) 3,750.00 1,875 f
Sett River Proj ect Agricultural Improvement & Power District 1,080,225.00 540,113 San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
1,490,000.00 745,000 Santee Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
37,580.00 18,790 Sedgwick County Elec. Coop. Assn. (Kan.)
8,516.00 4,258 L
A
Contribution Actagasnts (con;inuadl Pledae
_33ceived Shelby Elec. Coop. (ItL.)
16,449.10 8,225 Shenandoah Valley Elec. Coop. (Va.)
34,000.00 17,000 Sherrard Power System 10,000.00 5,000 Shayenne Valley Elec. Coop., inc. [N.D.)
5,000.00
_-2,500 Sho-Me Power Corp. (Mo.)
19,330.00 9,665 Sierra Pacific Power Co.
408,730.00 204,365 Sioux Center Municipal Utilities (Iowa) 3,569.91 1,785 Sioux Valley Empire Elec. Assn., Inc. (S.D.)
28,137.10 14,069 Slash Pine EMC iga.)
7,313.00 3,657 Slope Elec. Coop., Inc. (N.D.)
5,996.70 2,998 Smoky HitL Elec. Coop., Inc. (Kan.)
4,280.00 2,140 Smoky Valley Elec. Coop. Assn., Inc. [Kan.)
1,425.00 713 South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
1,582,381.00 791,191 South Mississippi Elec. Power Assn.
233,767.57 116,884 South Pte'.nes Elec. Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
33,752.72 16,876 Southern Cali fornia Edison Co.
10,555,000.00 5,277,500 Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.
466,340.00 233,170 Southern Maryland Elec. Coop., Inc.
129,440.00 64,720 Southside Elec. Coop. [Va.)
44,076.86 22,038 Southwest Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp.
28,465.00 14,233 Southwest Texas Elec. Coop., Inc.
8,485.00 4,243 f
Southwestern Electric Power Co.
1,143,917.00 571,959 Springfield Utility Board (Ore.)
43,950.00 21,975 i
Stamford Elec. Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
10,110.00 5,055 i
l Sumner-CowLey Elec. Coop., Inc. [Kan.)
10,518.62 5,259 l
. Surprise Valley Elec. Corp. [Cel.1 8,680.00 4,340 l
l
o.
Contribution Aoreements (continued)
Pledoe Received Surry-Yadkin EMC (N.C.)
17,653.77 8,827 Swisher County Elec. Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
19,000.00 9,500 Tatquin Elec. Coop., Inc. (FLa.)
30,865.00 15,433 Tenner Elec. (Wash.)
1,900.00 950 j
i Taylor County Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
5,720.00 2,860 l
l Taylor Elec. Coop., Inc. (Tex.)
13,628.26 6,81 4 Tennessee Valley Authority 21,700,000.00 10,850,000 Texas Electric Service Co.
2,744,500.00 1,372,250 Texas Power & Light Co.
2,220,000.00 1,110,000 Three Notch EMC (Ga.)
18,549.00 9,275 Three Rivers Elec. Coop. (Mo.)
17,660.00 8,830 Tideland EMC (N.C.)
10,904.62 5,452 TilLamook People's Utility District (Ore.)
54,645.00 27,323 Tipmont REMC (Ind.)
24,683.00 12,342 Tongue River Elec. Coop., Inc. (Mont.)
5,884.00 2,932 TrempeaLeau Elec. Coop. (Wis.)
13,316.00 6,658 Tri-County Elec. Coop., Inc. (I t L. )
20,895.88 10,448 Tri-County Elec. Coop. (Minn.)
24,000.00 12,000 Tri-County Elec. Coop. (Vs.)
8,293.23 4,1 47 U.G.I. Corporation 113,059.70 56,530 l
UmstilLa Elec. Coop. Assn. (Ore.)
26,320.00 13,160 Union Electric Co.
4,073,000.00 2,036,500 l
The United Illuminating Co.
996,800.00 498,400 l
Utah Power & Light Co.
1,284,200.00 642,100 Vers Irrigation District #15 (Wash.)
16,290.00 8,145 Verdigris Valley Elec. Coop., Inc. (Okla.)
20,000.00 10,000 i
- Con t r i b u t i o n.. Ag rggm en t s Icontinuedl Ptedag_
Received The Victory Elec. Coop. Assn. (Kan.)
6,187.50 3,094 Vigilante Elec. Coop., Inc. (Mont.)
7,660.16 3,830 Virginia Elec. Coop. (Va.)
43,167.90 21,584 Virginia Electric & Power Co.
5,253,500.00 2,626,750 Walton EMC (Ga.)
36,000.00 18,000 Washington Elec. Coop., Inc. (Vt.)
8,510.00 4,255 Washington Water Power Co.
1,021,110.00 510,555 Waterford Electric Light Co.
3,413,.00 1,707 Waushara County Elec. Coop., Inc. (Wis.)
5,535.46 2,768 Wayne White Counties Elec. Coop. (ILL.)
46,813.30 23,407 West Central Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.O.)
12,640.00 6,320 West Plaines Elec. Coop., Inc. (N.O.)
11,465.00 5,733 West River Elec. Assn., Inc. (S.O.)
11,520.93 5,760 West Texas Utilities Co.
536,000.00 268,000 Western ILLincis Elec. Coop.
7,294.71 3,647 Wheatland Elec. Coop., Inc. (Kan.)
44,012.35 22,006 White River Valley Elec. Coop., Inc.
20,519.10 10,260 Wild Rica Elec. Coop., Inc. (Minn.)
12,673.80 6,337 Winnebago REC Assn. (Iowa) 7,090.00 3,545 Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
2,881,250.00 1,440,625 Wisconsin Power & Light Co.
810,888.00 405,444 Wisconsin Public Service Corp.
858,300.00 450,608 Withlecoaches River Elec. Coop., Inc.
[Fla.)
27,978.00 13,989 Wright County REC (Iowa) 8.618.00 4.309 TOTAL
$256.899.269.99
$126.681.732 A
__P:r ti v e d _
LETTERS OF INTENT
_E1;_d.ng_
c City of Bandon (Dra.)
4,190.00 4,190 City of McMinnville, Water & Light Dept. (Ore.)
39.810.00 19.905 Total (2 Let,ters of intent) 8 44.000.00 24.095 Total (379 pledges) 8256.943.269.99
$126.7b5.827 CASH CONTRIBUTIONS Central Iowa Power Coop.
20,232.13 20,232 Central Kansas Power Co.
24,000.00 24,000 Corn Belt Assn. of Elec. Coops.
13,948:32 13,948 Dixie REC (Utah) 47.40 47 Indian Elec. Coop., Inc. (Okla.)
100.00 100 Newberry Elec. Coop., Inc. (S.C.)
5,430.96 5,430 Oklahome Gas & Elec. Co.
572,598.07 572,598 Osceole Elec. Cocp., Inc. (Iowe) 100.00 100 Total (8 cash contributions) 636.456.ER 636.456 GRAND TOTAL
$257.579.726.87
$127.342.284 i
i-UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCl. EAR REGULATORY COM4ISSION 9
In the matter of
.)
)
Department of Energy
.)
DOCKET NO. 50-537 PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and,)
i
)
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
.)
k AFFIDAVIT OF John R. Longenecker, being duly sworn, deposes and says l
i as follows:
i 1.
That he is employed as Manager, Licensing and Environmental
't Coordination, Office of Nuclear Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, and that he is duly authorized to answer interroga-iy tories numbers 1, 7.13. and 14 in the first set.
1 2.
That the above-mentioned and attached answers are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
j:
G.!,
g 51ggure SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this R day of /pe eL., 1982.
Ii iIy JA u cl. Ohr..La.
?
Notary"Public g
l
. C issio..a.,ms 1 _.
4 2'
00MAltf PUGUC STATE OF MAanANO fi l.
alyCommissaan Empir** A4 3,1982 2
g 3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of
.)
Department of Energy
.)
DOCKET NO. 50-537 PRCAIECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and )
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
.)
AFFIDAVIT OF John R. Longenecker, being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:
1.
That he is employed as Manager, Licensing and Environmental Coordination, Office of Nuclear Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, and that he is duly authorized to update the replies to Items 6 and 8 in the first set, items V.9 and V.10 in the tenth set and items 1, 2, and 3 in the fourteenth set of interrogatories propounded by the Natural Resources Defense Council, et. al.
2.
That the above-mentioned and attached answers are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief, b
4 51gnagre
$5CRIBED and SWORN to before me this /9 day of 8p#, d,1982.
a s lit <> b3 b
d>J NotaryvPublic Ity Comission expires
, 19_.
PAmcu o "h,'cuerno E OF MAmace
1 L
l-UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of
,)
Department of Energy
,)
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and,)
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
,)
AFFIDAVIT OF Michael Lawrence, being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:
1.
That he is employed as Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Fuel Cycle, U.S. Department of Energy, and that he is duly authorized to answer interrogatories numbered 19 and 23 in the first set.
2.
That the above-mentioned and attached answers are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
W b_
uwe -
~'
Sigirature SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this R /
day of [ p p fL, 1982.
O&SD 0
n]JJ Notary Public My Commission expires
, 19_.
PATR' CIA G. CIUMB:::G NOT/RY FUBUC STAT 2 Or MARYlANC M,- 0:mm ts:on Empitcs M/,19C2 i
1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DOCKET N0. 50-537 PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, and TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY AFFIDAVIT OF RAYM0ND L. COPELAND Raymond L. Copeland, being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:
1.
That he is employed as Acting Assistant Director, Public Safety, CRBRP Project, and that he is duly authorized to answer Interrogatories 9-12 in the First Set of Interrogatories.
2.
That the above-mentioned and attached answers are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
Luun do
/
'S at/Gre s
SUBSCRIB SWORN to before me this//j__dayof
',1982.
b Fotar Ub'ic l
My Commission expires
,19 _.
l My Commission Expires April 28,1934
l l
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of
,)
Department of Energy
,)
f DOCKET No. 50-537 PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and,)
i TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
,)
AFFIDAVIT OF Dr. F. C. Gilbert, being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:
1.
That he is employed as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Materials, Defense Programs, U.S. Department of Energy, and that he is duty authorized to update the replies to Items 17 and 18, in the first set of interrogatories propounded by the Natural Resources Defense Council, et. el.
2.
That the above-mentioned and r,ttached answers are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
L i
S%6ature SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before se this
[ V day of ce,1,1982.
Sj D V la Notary fublic My Commission expires
, 19_.
i NOTARY PUgllC STATE OF h,,,,n My comminien aw w
t UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of
,)
Department of Energy
,)
DOCKET No. 50-537 PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and,)
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
,)
AFFIDAVIT OF william M. Hartman, being duty sworn, deposes and says as follows:
1.
That he is employed as Nuclear Engineer, Office of Reactor Research and Technology, U.S. Department of Energy, and that he is duty authorized to answer interrogatories numbered 16 and 20 in the first set and III.4 in the eighth set.
2.
That the above-mentioned and attached answers are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
&_$...~ Signature'
~
~
SUBSCRISED and SWORN to before me this /( day of fo e,C,1982.
F 8e j
l aW?u d box Notarf Public i
Ny Commission expires
, 19_.
PATIBCE G. ramaann MARY PutuC STATE OF Aung
%^
' '1 taph e Mr 1,1982
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of:
)
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
)
DOCKET NO. 50-537 PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, and
)
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
)
AFFIDAVIT of Douglas Hornstra, PMC, being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:
1.
That he is employed as Reactor Engineer, Engineering Division, CRBRP/P0 and that he is duly authorized to answer interrogatories numbered 21, 22, 24 and 25 in the First set.
2.
That the above-mentioned and attached answers are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
Cuc
% bau Signaty
./
SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this /e y of 1982.
6/m_ @ b NbtargPublic '
~
My C&fnmission Expires April 28,1934 5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIs5 ION
{
i In the Matter of U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DOCKET NO. 50-537 PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
.and TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY AFFIDAVIT OF PETER J. GROSS Peter J. Gross, being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:
3 1.
That he is employed as Deputy Chief, Reactor and Plant Systems Branch, CRBRP Project, and that he is duly authorized to answer Interroga '
tory 1,5 in the first set of Interrogatories.
2.
That the above mentioned and attached answers ar'e true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
1-
~
p
...t' Signatur
' ':' '. !,, s. 1 -
SUBSCRIBED.and SWORN to before me this 3d day of ho/,1982
$A X.blNLJ
~~
Notary Pyblic y Commission Expim5 M 8' 0019-9E9 Sid ND018 >IBO d8883 1HD 02:SI 002/Wr0
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
)
In the Matter of
)
)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
)
)
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
)
Docket No. 50-537
)
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
)
)
(Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant)
)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Service has been effected on this date by personal delivery or first-class mail to the following:
- Marshall E. Miller, Esquire Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20545 Dr. Cadet H. Hand, Jr.
Director Bodega Marine Laboratory University of California P. O. Box 247 Bodega Bay, California 94923
- Mr. Gustave A. Linenberger Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20545 I
- Daniel Swanson, Esquire
- Stuart Treby, Esquire Office of Executive Legal Director i
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20545 (2 copies) 1
l0
-2.
- Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear ' Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20545
- Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Pan,el U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20545
- Docketing & Service Section Office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20545 (3 copies)
William M. Leech, Jr., Attorney General William B. Hubbard, Chief Deputy Attorney General Lee Breckenridge, Assistant Attorney General State of Tennessee Office of the Attorney General 450 James Robertson Parkway Nashville, Tennessee 37219 Oak Ridge Public Library Civic Center Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37820 Herbert S. Sanger, Jr., Esquire Lewis E. Wallace, Esquire W. Walter LaRoche, Esquire James F. Burger, Esquire Edward J. Vigluicci, Esquire Office of the General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority 400 Commerce Avenue Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 (2 copies)
- Dr. Thomas Cochran Barbara A. Finamore, Esquire Natural Resources Defense Council i
1725 Eye Street, N. W., Suite 600 Washington, D. C.
20006 (2 copies) i l
l Mr. Joe H. Walker l
401 Roane Street l
Harriman, Tennessee 37748 Ellyn R. Weiss Harmon & Weiss 1725 Eye Street, N. W., Suite 506 Washington, D. C.
20006 s
.~_
Y
o l
. Lawson McGhee PQblic Library 500 West Church Street Knoxville,4 Tennessee 37902 a'
William E._Lantrip, Esq.
Attorney'for the City of Oak Ridge Municipal Building P. O. Box 1 Oak 1 Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Leon Silverstrom. Ecq.
Warren E. Bergholz, Jr., Esq.
U. S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., S. W.
Room 6-B-256, Forrestal Building Washington.,D. C.
20585 (2 copies)
- Eldon V. C. Greenberg Tuttle & Taylor ~
1901.L Street, N. W.,
Suite 805 Washington, D. C.
20036' Commissioner Jcces'Cotham Tenucasee Department of Economic and Community Dsvelopment Andrew Jackson Building, Suite 1007 Nashville, Tennessee 37219 i
A Geor M. Edg F Attorney for Project Management Corporation l
DATED: April 30, 1982 l
l i
l
- /
Denotes hand delivery to 1717 "H" Street, N.W., Washington, D. C.
i
- / Denotes hand delivery to indicated address.
t
.