ML20050N444
| ML20050N444 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 03/11/1982 |
| From: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050M886 | List: |
| References | |
| L-82-88, NUDOCS 8204140342 | |
| Download: ML20050N444 (4) | |
Text
-.-
.. ~.
P.o. BOX 570100 MI Af.11, F L 33152
,)
l f'
' ? f ',' n f.j 9 p ! b
[I h. tl (
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY March 11, 1982 L-82-88 i
i i
Mr. James P. O'Reilly l
Regional Administrator, Region II l
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
101 Marietta Street, Suite 300 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
?
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
}
l Re: RII:WPK l
St. Lucie Unit #2 Docket flo. 50-389/81-25 t
On February 25,1982, (L-82-63) Florida Power & Light Company provided a response to the NRC's inspection report No. 50-389/81-25. Subsequently, during a telephone conference call on March 4,1982 between Mr. W. Klein-l sorge (NRC), H. Dance (NRC) and FPL representatives additional clarifying information was provided to the NRC regarding violation B and C of the subject report. This clarification is formally submitted in the attach-ment to this letter.
l Very truly yours,
)p i
Robert E. Uhrig t
Vice President Advanced Systems & Technology l
REU/JAD/ga I
Attachnen t cc: Director of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. fluclear Regulatory Commission j
Washington, D. C.
20555 Harold F. Reis, Esguire i
i 8204140342 820329 PDR ADOCK 05000389 O
PDR i
PEOPLE.. SERVING PEOPLE 4
. -.. ~..
,. _.., _ _.. ~.,, _ -. _ _ _. -. _ _ _.. _,.
-_.m,._-_.
Page One ATTACHMENT RII:NPK 50-389/81-25 VIOLATION B: FAILURE TO PROVIDE CHANGES OF DRAWINGS TO THE LOCATION OF FABRICATION 10CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI as implemented by Section 6 of the FP&L Topical Report (FP&L-TQAR-1-76A) requires measures be established to control the issuance of drawings including changes to assure that drawings are distributed and used at the location where activities affecting quality are accomplished.
Contrary to the above, on December 17, 1981, measures were not adequate to control the issuance of drawings including change to assure changes are distributed to fabrication locations in that Conax drawing for electrical penetration D-1 identified by EBASCO no. 2998-488, Revision 5 marked " Proceed With Fabrication" dated 4/10/79 was not avail-able at the site.
The latest revision to the above drawing available at the site was Revision 3 dated 7/28/75.
CLARIFICATION:
The drawing EMDRAC 2998-488, Revision 5 is identical to revision G of the vendor's drawing for this penetration. The vendor's instruction manual was on site at the time of the NRC inspection (#50-389/81-25) and at the time of the electrical penetration installation.
The vendor's instruction manual which contained revision G of the vendor's drawing and applicable Field Change Requests, was utilized to perform the penetration installation.
VIOLATION C: FAILURE TO FOLLOW VISUAL INSPECTION Procedure:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criteion V as implemented by Section 5 of the FP&L Topical Report (FP&L-TQAR-1-76A) requires activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with procedures. ASME B&PV Code Section III Paragraph NC-4232.1 and FP&L Procedure QI-9.1, Revision 4,
" Visual Inspection of Welds" Technique 1, paragraph 1.2.3.2 requires the offsat over the width of a finished weld between materials of different thichness be faired to at least a 3 to 1 taper.
. ~
Page Two ATTACHMENT RII:WPK 50-389/81-25 VIOLATION C: FAILURE TO FOLLOU VISUAL INSPECTION Procedure: (continued)
Contrary to the above, on December 16, 1981, activities affecting quality were not accomplished in accordance with procedures in that the offset across weld joint No. CS-006-FW-002 (valve to pipe weld),
which had been previously inspected and accepted, was steaper than the required 3 to 1 taper.
Supplemental Response:
In addition to the training described in our response dated February 25, 1982, FPL will also perform reinspection of all the welds previously accepted for 3:1 taper by the QC Inspector who failed to reject CS-0006-FN-002.
Also, a random check will be made of previously accepted 3:1 taper welds to determine if a more extensive, generic problem exists.
To date, ten (10) 3:1 taper welds have been reinspected and found acceptable. This effort will continue until sufficient confidence is obtained to determine that the cause is isolated to a single QC inspec-tor.
This effort is scheduled for completion by May 1, 1982.
l I
{
l
_ ~. _
STATE OF FLORIDA
)
)
ss.
COUNTY OF DADE
)
Robert E. Uhri9 being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
That he is Vice President of Florida Power &
Light Company, the herein; That he has executed the foregoing document; that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, and that he is authorized to execute the document o ehalf of said gy e.
u n tuf%
l 7
I Robert E. Uhrig Subscribed and sworn to before me this
//
_ day of NM 19 [h i,0 $ %AAAA NOTAitY F UBLIC, ig and for the County of Dade, State of Florida
.,., gr..
. 'K My commission expires:
vs c-r
- g e o a.,a....m.
I
,