ML20050E012
| ML20050E012 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 04/02/1982 |
| From: | Vassallo D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Jackie Jones CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8204120464 | |
| Download: ML20050E012 (2) | |
Text
2 J
49
'y~
s APRIL. n2 M DISTRIBUTI0il:
ORB #2 Rdg 0 ELD Docket File DEisenhut AE0D NRC PDR SNorris IE L PDR JVanVliet ACRS-10 Docket !!o. 50-324 P0'Connor Gray File IN g
NRandall FClemenson Q
Johnson, GIB g
jp 3
,w '
4 s
c7
'0"h' #
Mr. J. A. Jones
' g; cli;.
Senior Executive Vice President Carolina Power & Light Company 3.N Q pf.. ' v; 336 Fayetteville Street 6
Raleigh, florth Carolina 27602
Dear 11r. Jones:
SUBJECT:
Il1PLEf!ENTATION OF UNRESOLVED SAFETY ISSUE A-10 BWR N0ZZLE CRACKIt'G RE: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit 2 Dy letter dated December 17, 1981 you pmvided additional information concerning your earlier mquest to perforn dye-penetrant inspection of only the accessible portions of the nozzle blend radius on the Brunswick Unit 2 feedwater nozzles. You assert that this request is only for the 1982 refueling outage, and that adhemnce to the NUREG-0Gl9 Table 2 Inspection Requirements will begin with the. refueling outage presently scheduled for late 1983. Performance of the inspection at this later time would permit it to be conducted in conjunction with the scheduled feedwater sparger replacement.
11e concur with your assessment that, based on:
(1) the successful results of previous liquid penetrant tests; (2) the fact that the acces-sible area is approximately BM of the total area; and (3) ALARA con-siderations, your request is valid on a one-time basis. Therefore, we consider it acceptable to perforn dye-penetrant inspection of only the accessible portions of the feedwater nozzle blend radius for Brunswick 2 during the 1982 refueling outage.
lic request that you provide us with your sparger replacement / nozzle inspection schedule at least 90 days prior to the start of work. lie consider no other correspondence to be necessary on the subject of A-10 inplementation until your submittal of the reports requested in NUREG-0619.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your Project !!anager.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, O!B clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
3/ W 82
/
r204120464 820402 Sincerely' GIB: DST j
PDR ADOCK 05000324 O
PDR p
Criginal signed by RJohnso
.ORBf2:DL DRB#2:DW ORB #5:DL %
I
- D y C-UKbed:UL 5N6 JVan"V1fet"-
"Donenic"B;"VassallorChi M DVH5sNTT6""
= >co 3/)f"*'" '
. @.. Ehnor.. Operating.kactars..Branc r.42...an a
".,1.......
3g82-:cb..,,3/30/82,.,
Di vision,0f Li ce,n,s,ir,ig,,
3/f/,/82
.T// /8 32 cue)........, c,:.,, Seg
,,,,,,page.,,,
nac ronu ais oown sncu om OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam mi-meo
~-
O l
.Mr.=J.-A. Jones 3
cc:
Richard E. Jones, Esquire Carolina Power & Light Company v
336 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 George F. Trowbridge, Esquire i
.Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.
}
Washington, D. C.
20036 l
Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission P. O. Box 1057 Southport, North Carolina 28461 South;' ort - Brunswick County Libracy 1011 'rl. Moore Street Southport, North Carolina 28461 Mr. Charles R. Dietz Plant Manager P. O. Box 458 Southport, North Carolina 28461 James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 t'
n
(
(
- jf N
UNITED STATES
%o o~,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h,
g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 z
/
April 2, 1982 Docket No. 50-324 Mr. J. A. Jones Senior Executive Vice President na Power & Light Company Caroli'yetteville Street 336 Fa Raleigh,\\ North Carolina 27602
\\
Dear Mr. Jon'es :
SUBJECT:
IMPL TATION OF UNRESOLVED SAFETY ISSUE A-10, BWR N0ZZLE CRACKIN(I RE: Brunswick Steam ectric Plant, Unit 2 By letter dated December
,1981 you provided additional i ormation concerning your earlier req est to perfom dye-penetrant ' spection of only the accessible portions f the nozzle blend radi on the Brunswick Unit 2 feedwater nozzles. You ssert that this req st is only for the 1982 refueling outage, and that dherence to the REG-0619 Table 2 Inspection Requirements will begi with the re eling outage presently scheduled for late 1983.
Performan of th nspection at this later time would permit it to be conducted 'n c junction with the scheduled feedwater sparger replacement.
We concur with your assessment tha, base on:
(1) the successful results of previous liquid penet nt tests; 2) the fact that the acces-sible area is approximately 80 of the total rea; and (3) ALARA con-siderations, your request is alid on a one-ti basis. Therefore, we consider it acceptable to rfom dye-penetrant spection of only the accessible portions of t feedwater nozzle blend adius for Brunswick 2 during the 1982 refu9(ing outage.
We request that you, provide us with your sparger repla ment / nozzle inspection schedule at least 90 days prior to the start f work. We consider no other/ correspondence to be necessary on the s ject of A-10 implementation until your submittal of the reports requeste in NUREG-0619.
Should you have' any questions, please do not hesitate to cont et your Project Manager.
/
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this etter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, 02 clearance is not quired under P,.L.96-511.
/
Sincerely, 2
/
j Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #2 cc: See next page Division of Licensing
.