ML20050D491

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
to Procedure OAP1895.00N, ALARA Program
ML20050D491
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/01/1981
From: Puyter D
ILLINOIS POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20050D489 List:
References
OAP1895.00N, NUDOCS 8204120257
Download: ML20050D491 (14)


Text

.-- . _ . - - _ . . -- . , - . .- . . . _ - - . - - . . -=- _. _.

CPS No. 0AP1895.00N.

! Rev. 1 i.

I a

1 J

J 4

CLINTON POWER STATION j ALARA PROGRMd

ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY f

For general guidance and i policy only and in no way supercedes station procedures.

t I

t s'C l O .'l'.;lV ..

U]\ -

' os.m u, ,l' ,!'_'i, O 'y

! :? (

i

. _, , ; ; ; , V; 4? .l 3

l 'l i

i t

1 Prepared by: J.5. kV % D Submitted by: _

M /Lt. _

Reviewed by: M

\ '

Reviewed by: ..

4 /

Approved by:

t 7M w s 7 2A/f'l

-7 ,

Date i

i i;

\'

8204120257 820407 PDR ADOCK 05000461 A

PDR

CPS No. 0AP1005.01F003 (Rev. 5)

.N102-3 ( 6-81) CPS TEM' XARY CHANGE FORM SI ~O/06 yar - SEQ. No.

Procedure No. d/ 'S A/o . c/V /,?9 r o o.J Revision /

Title A ,vo 44. , ;,pa..,

TCF Issue Date F .f-P/ TCF Expiration Date e/a Originated by: [ . f . ,4 [ ne o-> t, Description of Change:

%: s. M @d  :

~ " "

  • l 'N W J-DiSnw O'v%/lic 10c,9,,a O "~ ' ' * - SEM&tGh 11Y THc guy,zq S,,,,,,g,
p ;m 1

'-i e

. . . ., . . . . ;, -. , ,3 q .

1*- gz; i t , : t. . ,. ...

^1 , ii.il. ; .j\ i 3V ! c L.1 Reviewed Byi' O Not Approved - Discontinue Use;

/3.afV,/mx

/.

j 4

Return to Responsible Dept. Heac Management Staff Member [ Issued for 92 day usage (maximun Q Issued for Procedure Rev'sion i Management S taf Miemoer O Issued for Cancellation

  • At least one (1) hf)theabove must have SRO License.

REMARKS:

FRG Date Reviewed Bv:

y1

?

'l1

' ,N OE '

{q h,a Wg/pp Compliance Supervisor Date 1 J$J UV Approved y:

/Tk u k WTl? !

Fowe r Fl~antj!anas;er _.

Da't'ei . _ .

, _ _ - . . - = . - - ._. .- . - = . . _ - . . . . . - - _ . _ . - - . = - _ . . .

l CPS No. 0AP1895.00N Rev. O i

4 I

.l CLINTON POWER STATION ALARA PROGRAM 1

ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY

For general guidance and policy only and in no way supersedes station or power production department procedures.

i j

, ,. ,. e ..s n ., . ~ ~ (* 3 qi\'I\/

E

{v,s 8 3I:!~~

. ; 21 s.--

, 'h l.; h k5j kI{} b k

.e I

Prepared by:

/

7// -

ural

/

i Submitted by: e de b Med Reviewed by: k Reviewed by: h/!/ ( i

'\

C) (LGW Approved by: N[ b 12/f/77 Date

CPS No. 0APlS95.00N

- Rev. 1 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Page Revision 4 1 11 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 r ^ n l '1

.- 5 .-

t

-a mi;,q a

. ,t3[',u v ,- r g/

V', i . .  ; . i i Q l '.,

I,)) ,l L 1

i

CPS No. 0AP1895.00N

, Rev. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Management Philosophy and Cor=niement III. Occupational Radiation Excosure ALARA Program A. Objectives B. Guidelines IV. Organization A. Vice President B. Manager of Nuclear Station Engineering C. Clinton Pouer Station Plant Manager D. Supervisor - Radiation Protection E. ALARA Cor=nittee F. Nuclear Review Audit Group (NRAG)

.,p q ,: ,m ~  ; q~.i'-Q((\/

, o .

} 1 ., .-){ )3 Jj ,, ,

.5v I; .'5 J

CPS No. 0APlS95.00N

, Rev. 1 ALARA

. ~ .m ., ,.-

_ Q Q , pnt ;,..

t;md ? : A All \

.;a' i ult;illf!.d d @. l Y v ! l' l'4 3

I. Introduction Appendix I to 10CFR50 (May 1975) issued by the U. S. '!uclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) provides numerical guides for design obj ectives to meet the "as icw as reasonably achievable" (ALARA) criterion for radioactive material in licht water reactor effluents.

This has resulted in extensive and costly modifications in the radioactive waste treatment systems of presently operating plants and the installation of similar systems in new plant designs. In addition, 40CFR190 (January 1977) issued by the U. S. Environ-mental Protection Agency (EPA) has reduced the original limits (10CFR20) on maximum allowable exposures to the general public by a factor of twenty. Both of these new criteria have caused present operating plants and new plants to be designed with ela-borate and demonstrably effective waste treatment systems. Thus, we are" caking all reasoniole measures to keep radiation exposure to the general public "as lcw as reasonably achievable" (ALARA).

The NRC has also issued two Regulatory Guides, 8. 8 and 8.10, which require the development of a management and operating philosophy to keep occupational radiation exposures ALARA. In addition, the NRC, in new plant design review, and the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) are urging the industry to go beyond cualitative commitments and establish quantitative commitments.

The intent of this document is to define a corporate management philosophy and a program that will achieve a resoluticn of ALARA criterion in both the public and operacing plant sectors.

II. Management Philosophy and Commitment It is Illinois Power Company's intention to ensure that nuclear powe niant desian and operation is conducted in a manner such that

' occupational exposure will be "as icw as reasonably achievable".

If it can be shown in a reasonable fashion that the radiation exposure is "truly unavoidable" or the " cost" of reducing radia-tion exposure is unreasonable in comparison with the ecm=ensurate benefit, then it is by definition ALARA. Maintaining occupaticnal radiation exposure ALARA is a management commitment and designated individuals within the ccupany will be charged with the responsi-bility of implementing it. To be achieved successfully, ALARA must be practiced at all empl oyee levels . To fulfill this commitment, a basic management ALARA program will be defined and implemented for the Clinton Power Station. This program 1

j -

CPS No. 0AP1895.00'i Rev. 1 l

,.s -s1>

e ,, > - ' 31 9. [,. M.]

. > fl '[:

i, ,y;' 3 -r '

o ,.
,
    • "^.

,i o n : /

e .

4 - -

e l  ;) . t w'ilI }r}ecognize that future plant designs, operating plant i design modifications and operating plant experience are inter-related and radiation exposure information developed through operating experience will be reflected in those design acti-vities. This will be an interdepartmental program involving J

the Nuclear Station Engineering" and Clinton Power S tation

) Operating Departments. ~

III. Occupational Radiation Excesure ALARA Procram A. Objectives In order to imoLrent corporate management's commitment to

keep occupatio^nal doses ALARA, a basic program is outlined j here. The objectives of this program are twofold

(1) To maintain the annual dose (rem) to individual station personnel ALARA.

(2) To maintain the annual integrated dose (=an-rem) to all personnel at the station ALARA.

B. Guidelines (1) The quarterly dose to any individual should not exceed 2 Rem without appropriate management authorization and i written justification.

! (2) As a decision tool in determining if a particular job or design is ALARA, management shall direct a cost t study to be done in cases where it believes it necessary j or if the dose exceeds the following guidelines.

(a) If the dose is either estimated or known from past experience to be greater than 10 man-rem total ~for

a particular j ob.

(b) If the dose is greater than 10 man-rem / year for routine recurring j obs.

! First and foremost ALARA represents a cce=itment to carefully l consider all potential dose reductions to the general public and radiation unkers . All aspects of the dose reduc-tien will be considered including individual doses, total population doses, frequency of occurrence, technical feasibility:

+

of suggested modifications , and economics of suggested modifications.

I

! In assessing the econcmic portion of potencial modifications

or programs the follcwing guidelines should be used. When only the health benefits to the general public or plant

< 2

CPS No. 0AP1895.00N Rev. 1

-. . m s: 4 ,o.,$i '/

V. . 1 , i ,-

. , , ' ' s.i } l ;.L, .

. . a

, vt i._. .> - -

radiation workers need be considered the 10CFR50 value of

$1000 (1975 dollars) per man-rem, integrated over the period of exposure, should be used. When a potential dose reduction affects clant radiation workers because of the added cost of repla' cement workers , a dollar value of $6000 (1975 dollars) per man-rem per year, average dose rate reduction, should be used. This figure represents an economic ec.uivalent of a dose rate reduction (dose per year) and cannot be integrated over the period of exposure. However, an additional value of $1000 per man-rem, integrated over the period of exposure, should be added to this calculation to account for the health benefits to the radiation workers (see examples).

It shculd be emphasized that a dollar value, as calculated above, is not sufficient justification alone in decidinn on the merits of a given modification. Instead, careful consideration of all factors followed by prudent judgment related to this consideration will dictate the final decision.

EXJ3PLES A proposed modification results in a savings of 5 man-rem every other year for the life of the plant.

Average man-rem /yr reduction = 5/2 = 2.5 man-rem /yr ALARA cost = replacement cost + health cost Replacement cost = $6000 x 2.5 = $15,000 Health Cost = $1000 x 2.5 x 40 = $100,000 ALARA cost = S115,000 For a one-time dose reduction of 2.5 man-rem (all in the same year) the ALARA cost would be:

$6000 x 2.5 + S1000 x 2.5 = $17,500 l

i l At the station, a dose measurement and record system shall j be set up such that for each individual receiving a dose that requires a Radiation Work Permit, the source (s) of at least 30 percent of the dose as recorded by the personnel dosimetry system shall be identified in detail.

The extent of the detail required is dependent upon the job category, the maj or plant system, the ccmponent within i

i 3

CPS "o. 0AP1895.00N Rev. 1 the system, and the type of work done. For each j ob , the source (s) shall be described, and the nature of the radiation shall be identified. Most of the dose at the station (approximately 80 percent) should be accounted for in a reasonable fashion.

- n n,,

,. 3i.-

I IN

.u ' m 3 ,1 ~ ~~' p, N. O '1,j L {i :),

IV. Organization f lj [,i ' ,  ; _

O3 '
  • Figure 1 describes the organitations performing activities related to the Clinton Power Station. The positions as shown on Figure 1 whid2 are responsible for the principal elements of the ALARA program are:

A. Vice President The Illinois Power Company ALARA program will be implemented under the direction of the Vice President. The Vice President is responsible for the overall effectiveness of the program.

This resconsibility is carried out through the Manager of Nu-clear St'ation Engineering and the Clinton Power Station

~

Plant Manager.

B. Ihnrer of Nuclear S tation Engineerine The Manager of Nuclear Station Engineering is responsible for all design and engineering aspects of ALARA during design and construction. He will be responsible for all design and engineering aspects of ALARA for any major modifications to the Clinton Power Station.

C. Clinton Power Station Plant Manager The Clinton Power Station Plant Manager is responsible for the overall " operational" ALAPA program. He will be responsible to ensure that operatienal criteria for ALARA are made available to the Manager of Nuclear Station Engineer-ing to be used for design.

D. Supervisor - Padiation Protection The Supervisor - Padiation Protection is responsible for:

(1) Monitoring for ALARA during plant design and construction.

This will include:

(a) Assisting the Manager of Nuclear Station Engineering by preparing and evaluating design recuirements and performing ALARA design reviews in the follow-ing areas.

1. Recuirements for radiological control.
2. Adecuacy of plant layouts for radiological control.

L

CPS No. 0AP1895.00N Rev. 1

....m ,-- ^ 11 m 3:1 T/

-- m r+ .

a .id

,-jim.:

~

,. ! d l i;t .

. .s .

3. Shield designs.
4. Radiation detection and monitoring systems.
5. Radiation Protection facilities.
6. Fuel Handling
7. Radwaste handling and disposal.

(b) Peporting ALAFA reviews or evaluation findings to the ALARA committee.

(?.) Writing implementing procedures for the ALARA program.

(3) Establish a suitable and adequate Clinton Power Station occupational exposure accounting system. This vill include:

(a) A system for recording, reviewing, storing, and retrieving the exposure data to account for the exposures in the detail recuired by the ALARA program.

(b) Providing suitable and timely information to the different departmental supervisors to enable them to plan job assignments, etc.

(4) Establish and implement a radiation protection program for all station personnel, contractors and visitors that puts emphasis on the ALARA policy.

(5) Ensure that adequate resources, including personnel, facilities, instrumentation and equipment, are avail-able to achieve an effective ALARA program.

(6) Participate in ALARA reviews of new or modified plant facilities and/or eouiement that would cause a detrimental effect on existing radiation levels or which can affect radiation exposure to personnel.

(7) Coordinating or implementing, as appropriate, the ALA?A aspects of internal design modifications (those of a small or limited nature) or emergency modification.

(8) Cerduct an ALARA review of operational plant activities -

i for the purpose of identifying the locations, operations and ccnditions which have a potential for causing or have caused significant radiaticn exposures to personnel.

l

( 9) Assist the ALARA Committee by:

(a) Serving on the Staff of the Ccmmittee.

5

. CPS No. 0AP1395.00N

.- Rev. 1 (b) Conducting at least biennial (every two years) re-views of procedures, records, reports, etc., used to comply with the Company ALARA guidelines and the NRC regulatory recuirements.

(c) Conducting reviews of NFC, INF0, Nuclear Energy Liability-Property Insurance Association (NELPIA),

etc., audit reports that are related to radiation protection and plant overexposure reports.

(d) Providing technical guidance and assistance to persons involved in ccepliance with the ALARA pro-gram.

(e) Prior to a refueling outage review the proposed radiation protection coverage for the outage and submit a report to the ALARA Committee.

(10) When necessary, use direct recourse via che Vice President to resolve questions related to the conduct of the radiation protection program not resolved via the ALARA Committee.

mq,,,--^-  ;

i V!12 2 ,i . 1. l s. s.2 d i : b. :

E. ALARA Committee A committee of six members, ccmposed of the Clinten Power Station Plant Manager, the Assistant Power Plant Manager, the Supervisor - RadChem, the Supervisor -Radiation Protection, the Member-at-Large and the NSE representative. This committee shall be chaired by the Clinton Pcwer Station Plant Manager. This committee is responsible for:

(1) Assisting the Vice President, Manager of Nuclear Station Engineering and Clinton Power Station Plant Manager in ensuring that the ALARA philosophy, objectives and guide-lines are complied with.

(2) Reporting in writing to the Vice President and the Manager of Nuclear Station Engineerinc on the implementa-tion and progress of the ALARA occupational exposure program and reccamend policies en ALARA occupational exposure.

(3) Providing clarification of the guidelines or develop additional guidelines as necessary to fulfill the corporate management commitment.

(4) As an initial developmental effort (a) to provide tech-nical guidance and assistance in the implementaticn phase and (b) develop detailed schedules for implementa-tions of the guidelines.

. CPS Ho. 0AP1895.00M E* 1 g...- '

, - - + , s y \ ,1 f ,aL]i ittu-  :: , , . . . ;, w.

i:vi !;} s 2

2 C5) As a continuing effort to be responsible for: ,

, (a) Assuring effective measures are taken to provide procedures and practices by which specific goals and objectives of the ALARA proFram are achieved.

(b) Assuring that the resources needed to achieve ALARA are available and effectively utilized.

(6) During design and construction meet at least twice a j year to:

(a) Review the current status of the ALARA program.

(b) Review the ALARA audits of the engineering, pro-curement and construction activities.

(c) Review any changes in regulations in the area of j radiological controls.

(d) Review all ALARA Reviews generated by the Supervisor -

Radiation Protection since the last meeting.

(7) During commercial operation meet at least twice a year and within 30 days prior to a refueling and/or major planned maintenance shutdown (greater than 21 days) to:

(a) Review the outage plan relative to ALARA, to assess the potential for exposure to radiation.

i' (b) Provide technical guidance and assistance in pro-grams to keep er.posures ALARA.

i -

(c) Review any radiolcgical controls inspection re-Dorts from the NRC and evaluate corrective action l 'lans p or implerentation.

(d) Review any changes in regulations in the area of radiological controls and evaluate or effect appro-priate implementation.

(e) Review all ALARA Reviews generated by the Supervisor .

Radiation Protection since the last meeting.

(8) Reviewing implementing procedures for the ALARA program at the station to ensure that:

(a) All station personnel are informed of the ALARA

program guidelines.

! (b) Suitable authority is delegated to the appropriate

! plant personnel to obtain ccepliance with the ALARA program.

l t

?

7

. . - - - . . - ~ . , . - . - . - - - _ - . . . . , - . - - - , - . ,-- . - . . , -,--,--.----..,--,-,----n~. .

' . CPS No. 0A?l895.00M

.- Rev. 1 (c) Suitable advance plannine and special training is donc prior to station jobs involving radioloeical circurstarces to ensure AIAPA exposures.

F. Nuclear Review Audit Group (NPAG)

The NRAG shall review the A1. ARA program periodically to en-sure cor.pliance by all parties and report their findings to the Vice President.

c. . . - .- ,, T 5 3?

c .o r. . . i _' .

oj ;. It\j  ? 1/

E 'g h w a i. A .. , s l 1 ; . a \. bA "'

? y 'j*'.

g '.'s.s +

8

CPS No. 0AP1895.00N Rev. 1 3;. = , '.t I, 1 J/

.,,.s

.s ~

)\,;

,+ e m ,*' rij i

(, ;it y

,:'i-

+

[ ' .:) & 1f- a >

G ,. ,. . .

i > -. '

l J

i Vice f

4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,.

President i.

i.

1:

i.

I i'

i

, i.I i,

  • i, 1

Manager or l:

NBAG s-1 Nuclear Station , l i e i i~

Engineering i i-i i I I E t.

4 I 1:

i I' Clinton Power i ALARA '

4 Nuclear Station Committee

(-- Person Chair


Plant ,,.anager i 8:

i-Engineering

$/B/f $ @

l!

Representative i i e e i l i-

. l l l l l Clinton Asst. Power l; e i i e i ____________ i.

i e i

, i ,e i Plant Manager

i 1________________a i 1

, ,I ,i ,.

i a i I ii I i I I a I

!! !________________ Supervisor - l; 4

i i j Management i i RadChem i j Organization l l  !,

i i

t i i I

! 1 I i ALARA l l l

' ' Supervisor - Radiation

'---------------- j ,

Organization _ __ ___ _ l

+

i Protection i i i i

i  ;

, ,i

, l Memcer-at-Large ,

j i__________________. i i

i 4

FIGURE 1 i Illinois Pcwer Ccmpany ALARA Organization

_rr-_ . - - _ ~ ., -.m- . . _ - , . . , - ~- r - - , , , .-e -v w r r-m-s-- ---m- -w -.--.-----w- - - . . - - - - - -

4--.-3-w~,- .-.=---+,-,~---,.,--v- 4-----~< v