|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20137N1591997-03-31031 March 1997 Informs That Licensee Facility Scheduled to Administer NRC GFE on 970409.Sonalsts,Inc Authorized Under Contract to Support NRC Administration of GFE Activities ML20058M0361993-04-12012 April 1993 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards Records in App L Which Are Being Withheld Partially for Listed Reasons,(Ref FOIA Exemptions 5) ML20248D6521989-07-20020 July 1989 Forwards Response to Util Re Bills D0184 & D0185 for Plant OL Application Review Costs by Various Program Ofcs Through June 1984 ML20245D9621989-04-28028 April 1989 Forwards Addl Info Re Bunker Ramo Instrumentation Penetration Modules,Per 890131 Request.Util Believes That Modules Environmentally Qualified in Accordance w/10CFR50.49 & NUREG-0588,Category II ML20205C3521988-09-23023 September 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Plant. Forwards App D Documents.App D Documents Also Available in PDR ML20155A7001988-06-0202 June 1988 Informs That Const on Conversion of Plant to gas-fired Facility Began on 880404 ML20155A7401988-05-18018 May 1988 FOIA Request for Documents on 850731 & 870312 Meetings Re Plant.Document Re 840314 Meeting Previously Obtained & Therefore Excluded from Request ML20237B4361987-12-14014 December 1987 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.App B Document, Board Notification 84-024,encl & Also Available in PDR ML20236X6141987-12-0808 December 1987 Final Response to FOIA Request All Documents.No Addl Records Subj to Request Located ML20236U2571987-11-0505 November 1987 FOIA Request for Documents Re Ball Type Main Steam Isolation Valves Used at Facilities ML20235B3081987-09-21021 September 1987 Responds to FOIA Request for Documents,Including AEC to ACRS Forwarding Safety Evaluation Re Zimmer.App a Documents Cannot Be Located.App B Documents in Pdr.App C & D Documents Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20235M4251987-07-13013 July 1987 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Acrs. Forwards Documents for Categories One & Three of FOIA Request.Review of 21 Addl ACRS Documents Continuing ML20235K1731987-07-0909 July 1987 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Info Re Certain Contracts Awarded by NRC for Reporting Svcs.Forwards App a & B Documents.Documents Also Available in PDR ML20234F0911987-06-26026 June 1987 Responds to Appeal Re Denial of FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards Document 5 in App F.Portions of Document 5 Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemptions 6 & 7).Other Requested Documents Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 6) ML20215K1981987-06-19019 June 1987 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Allegations Concerning Plant.Forwards App G & H Documents.Documents Also Available in Pdr.App H Documents Partially Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 6) ML20213F9351987-05-0808 May 1987 Partial Response to FOIA Request.Forwards App F Document & Weld Allegations.App G Documents Partially Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 6) ML20206H4951987-04-13013 April 1987 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Bechtel Employment Discrimination.Forwards App E Documents.App D Documents Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 6) ML20235G2321987-04-0101 April 1987 FOIA Request for Documents Re Forged NDE Inspectors Certification Supplied by Barclay Intl for Use at Quad Cities Nuclear Station & Stated Investigations at Plants ML20211A9531987-02-13013 February 1987 Advises That Financial Info Submitted for 1987 in Util Satisfies Requirements of 10CFR140.21 That Each Licensee Maintain Guarantee of Payment of Deferred Premiums for Operating Reactors Over 100 Mwe ML20212M7651987-01-16016 January 1987 Informs That Due to Demands on Staff,Nrc Will Respond by 870430 to 850607 Request for Review of Invoices D0184 & D0185 Re OL Application Review Costs Through 840623 ML20207C0151986-12-19019 December 1986 Forwards Notice of Withdrawal of Application for OLs & Termination of Proceeding,Per Util 860711 Request & ASLB 861217 Memorandum & Order Granting Motion ML20207C1191986-12-18018 December 1986 Forwards Order Terminating CPPR-81 & CPPR-82 Based on Fact That Const of Facility Ceased,Units Inoperable & Site Environmentally Stable,Per Util 860701 Request to Withdraw Application to Amend CPs ML20215B9641986-12-0505 December 1986 Notifies Util of 870204-05 Early Emergency Responders Workshop in Chicago,Il to Discuss Lessons Learned & Current Problems in Coordination & Integration of Emergency Response Efforts.Meeting Agenda & Preregistration Form Encl ML20214Q0911986-11-24024 November 1986 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Ofc of Inspector & Auditor Investigations.Forwards App B Documents. Documents Also Available in PDR ML20214A0761986-11-14014 November 1986 Forwards Insp & Evaluation of Plant for Adequacy of Stabilization Plan,Documenting 861015-16 Site Insp & Review & Insp of Site Stabilization Rept.Environ Stabilization Satisfactory ML20215N0241986-10-28028 October 1986 Forwards Order from DOE Economic Regulatory Admininstration Granting Exemption from Prohibitions of Power Plant & Industrial Fuel Act of 1978 & Puc of Mi Opinion & Order Granting Relief from Commission 850329 Rate Order ML20215M8851986-10-28028 October 1986 Forwards Insp Repts 50-329/86-01 & 50-330/86-01 on 861015-16.No Violations Identified ML20211B5401986-10-0909 October 1986 Further Response to FOIA Request for Eight Categories of Documents Re Ee Kent Allegations Concerning Facilities. Forwards Documents Listed in App K ML20210S9971986-10-0202 October 1986 Requests Change in Facility Svc List Address to Ref Address. Related Correspondence ML20210S4131986-09-26026 September 1986 Further Response to FOIA Request for 16 Categories of Records Re Facilities.Forwards App D & E Documents.Documents Also Available in PDR ML20214T7431986-09-24024 September 1986 Forwards Form 8-K Filed W/Securities & Exchange Commission. Util Believes Info Presented Bears No Issues Currently Before Aslb.Related Correspondence ML20214N4541986-09-0808 September 1986 Provides List of Activities Re Remedial Soils Work Being Modified Pending Final Disposition of Issues Described in Util 860701 & Counsel s Withdrawing Request for CP Extension.W/Svc List.Related Correspondence ML20209E6621986-09-0505 September 1986 Responds to FOIA Request for Documents Re Util Response to NRC 840112 Confirmatory Order.Documents Listed on App Available in PDR IA-86-235, Responds to FOIA Request for Documents Re Util Response to NRC 840112 Confirmatory Order.Documents Listed on App Available in PDR1986-09-0505 September 1986 Responds to FOIA Request for Documents Re Util Response to NRC 840112 Confirmatory Order.Documents Listed on App Available in PDR ML20212K9061986-08-21021 August 1986 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Environ Review of Util 860711 Request to Withdraw Applications for OL by 860828 ML20206M8311986-08-15015 August 1986 Forwards Util Response to ASLB 860716 Order.W/O Encl.Related Correspondence ML20212J1391986-07-25025 July 1986 Forwards ALAB-106 Monthly Rept for June 1986.Listed Nonconformance Repts & Addl Documents Closed During June Encl ML20207D7261986-07-11011 July 1986 Forwards Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application & for Dismissal of OL & Order of Mod Proceedings & Motion for Termination of Aslab Jurisdiction.W/O Encl.Related Correspondence ML20202F9581986-07-11011 July 1986 Forwards Util Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application & for Dismissal of OL & Order of Mod Proceedings & Motion for Termination of Appeal Board Jurisdiction,For Filing.W/O Encl ML20203B2351986-07-10010 July 1986 Informs That Review of 820622 Application to Receive Unirradiated Nuclear Fuel Assemblies Terminated,Per .Fission Chambers Should Be Disposed of & Licenses SNM-1904 & SNM-1905 Terminated,Per 10CFR70.38(b) ML20206T2401986-07-0101 July 1986 Advises That Since Facility Formally Abandoned as Nuclear Facility,Util Will Not Reply to Generic Ltr 86-05 Re TMI Action Item II.K.3.5 ML20202B1091986-07-0101 July 1986 Forwards Evaluation of 13 Specific Recommendations Contained in BNL Rept of Review of Surveillance & Maint Program,In Response to CE Norelius 860506 Request ML20206T4321986-07-0101 July 1986 Withdraws Application for Ols.Facility Will Be Converted to combined-cycle gas-fired Plant.Abandonment Actions & Equipment Sales Will Provide Assurance That Plant Cannot Be Used as Nuclear Facility ML20199J9181986-06-30030 June 1986 Submits ALAB-106 Quarterly Rept 51.No New Individuals Assigned quality-related Duties.Const Shut Down Since 840716 & No Const Activities Projected for Jul-Sept 1986 ML20211L0361986-06-25025 June 1986 Forwards Bechtel & B&W Nonconformance Repts for May 1986,per Memorandum & Order ALAB-106 ML20198E9051986-05-25025 May 1986 Forwards ALAB-106 Monthly Rept for Apr 1986,including Nonconformance Repts,Quality Action Requests,Equality Audit Finding,B&W Repts of Nonconformance & Audit Finding Repts. Only Nonconformance Repts Encl ML20205P9331986-05-23023 May 1986 Responds to Generic Ltr 86-10, Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements. Project in Surveillance & Maint Mode.Generic Ltr & FSAR Update Will Be Reviewed When Project Restarted ML20203Q2891986-05-0606 May 1986 Forwards BNL Technical Rept, Surveillance & Maint..., Based on NRC 851014-18 Insp.No Violations Noted.Items Identified Could Have Impact on Later Project Restart. Evaluation of Rept Recommendations Requested within 60 Days ML20203N3901986-05-0101 May 1986 Forwards Rev 2 to Tdi Owners Group App Ii:Generic Maint Matrix & Justifications. Rev Approved by Tdi Owners Group & Tdi ML20205N5861986-04-29029 April 1986 Forwards Corrected Page 1 to JW Cook to H Berkow Re Pipe Whip Restraint Design.Last Line Inadvertently Eliminated When Ltr Originally Issued 1997-03-31
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20245D9621989-04-28028 April 1989 Forwards Addl Info Re Bunker Ramo Instrumentation Penetration Modules,Per 890131 Request.Util Believes That Modules Environmentally Qualified in Accordance w/10CFR50.49 & NUREG-0588,Category II ML20155A7001988-06-0202 June 1988 Informs That Const on Conversion of Plant to gas-fired Facility Began on 880404 ML20155A7401988-05-18018 May 1988 FOIA Request for Documents on 850731 & 870312 Meetings Re Plant.Document Re 840314 Meeting Previously Obtained & Therefore Excluded from Request ML20236U2571987-11-0505 November 1987 FOIA Request for Documents Re Ball Type Main Steam Isolation Valves Used at Facilities ML20216E4721987-05-28028 May 1987 Part 21 Rept 140 Re Potential Defect in Air Pressure Regulators Mfg by Bellofram.Dripwell Gasket May Fail Due to Mismachining of Gasket Seating Surface Causing Loss of Control Air & Starting Air Pressure ML20235G2321987-04-0101 April 1987 FOIA Request for Documents Re Forged NDE Inspectors Certification Supplied by Barclay Intl for Use at Quad Cities Nuclear Station & Stated Investigations at Plants ML20215N0241986-10-28028 October 1986 Forwards Order from DOE Economic Regulatory Admininstration Granting Exemption from Prohibitions of Power Plant & Industrial Fuel Act of 1978 & Puc of Mi Opinion & Order Granting Relief from Commission 850329 Rate Order ML20210S9971986-10-0202 October 1986 Requests Change in Facility Svc List Address to Ref Address. Related Correspondence ML20214T7431986-09-24024 September 1986 Forwards Form 8-K Filed W/Securities & Exchange Commission. Util Believes Info Presented Bears No Issues Currently Before Aslb.Related Correspondence ML20214N4541986-09-0808 September 1986 Provides List of Activities Re Remedial Soils Work Being Modified Pending Final Disposition of Issues Described in Util 860701 & Counsel s Withdrawing Request for CP Extension.W/Svc List.Related Correspondence ML20206M8311986-08-15015 August 1986 Forwards Util Response to ASLB 860716 Order.W/O Encl.Related Correspondence ML20212J1391986-07-25025 July 1986 Forwards ALAB-106 Monthly Rept for June 1986.Listed Nonconformance Repts & Addl Documents Closed During June Encl ML20207D7261986-07-11011 July 1986 Forwards Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application & for Dismissal of OL & Order of Mod Proceedings & Motion for Termination of Aslab Jurisdiction.W/O Encl.Related Correspondence ML20202F9581986-07-11011 July 1986 Forwards Util Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application & for Dismissal of OL & Order of Mod Proceedings & Motion for Termination of Appeal Board Jurisdiction,For Filing.W/O Encl ML20206T4321986-07-0101 July 1986 Withdraws Application for Ols.Facility Will Be Converted to combined-cycle gas-fired Plant.Abandonment Actions & Equipment Sales Will Provide Assurance That Plant Cannot Be Used as Nuclear Facility ML20202B1091986-07-0101 July 1986 Forwards Evaluation of 13 Specific Recommendations Contained in BNL Rept of Review of Surveillance & Maint Program,In Response to CE Norelius 860506 Request ML20206T2401986-07-0101 July 1986 Advises That Since Facility Formally Abandoned as Nuclear Facility,Util Will Not Reply to Generic Ltr 86-05 Re TMI Action Item II.K.3.5 ML20199J9181986-06-30030 June 1986 Submits ALAB-106 Quarterly Rept 51.No New Individuals Assigned quality-related Duties.Const Shut Down Since 840716 & No Const Activities Projected for Jul-Sept 1986 ML20211L0361986-06-25025 June 1986 Forwards Bechtel & B&W Nonconformance Repts for May 1986,per Memorandum & Order ALAB-106 ML20198E9051986-05-25025 May 1986 Forwards ALAB-106 Monthly Rept for Apr 1986,including Nonconformance Repts,Quality Action Requests,Equality Audit Finding,B&W Repts of Nonconformance & Audit Finding Repts. Only Nonconformance Repts Encl ML20205P9331986-05-23023 May 1986 Responds to Generic Ltr 86-10, Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements. Project in Surveillance & Maint Mode.Generic Ltr & FSAR Update Will Be Reviewed When Project Restarted ML20203N3901986-05-0101 May 1986 Forwards Rev 2 to Tdi Owners Group App Ii:Generic Maint Matrix & Justifications. Rev Approved by Tdi Owners Group & Tdi ML20205N5861986-04-29029 April 1986 Forwards Corrected Page 1 to JW Cook to H Berkow Re Pipe Whip Restraint Design.Last Line Inadvertently Eliminated When Ltr Originally Issued ML20197F8331986-04-28028 April 1986 Advises That Response to Generic Ltr 86-04 Re Engineering Expertise on Shift Inapproriate at Present Because Midland Not Currently Under Const.Commitment to Provide Info Will Be Added to Commitment Tracking Sys ML20210L2351986-04-25025 April 1986 Forwards ALAB-106 Monthly Rept for Mar 1986,including Nonconformance Repts,Quality Action Requests,Mgt Corrective Action Repts & Quality Audit Findings ML20203K8531986-04-23023 April 1986 Responds to NRC Re Allegation Concerning Adequacy of Pipe Whip Restraint Design.Project Records Placed in Storage & Personnel Performing Work Dispersed.Specific Design Approach Would Require Check of Records at Bechtel ML20203P1661986-04-21021 April 1986 Discusses 860407 Study Considering Options for Facility. Options Range from Abandonment of Facility to Completion as Nuclear Plant.Conversion of Plant to Combined Cycle gas-fired Plant Chosen as Most Favorable Option ML20209E6531986-03-28028 March 1986 FOIA Request for Documents Re Util Response to NRC 840112 Confirmatory Order ML20140F8781986-03-25025 March 1986 Forwards ALAB-106 Monthly Rept for Feb 1986,including Nonconformance Repts,Quality Action Requests,Mgt Corrective Action Repts & Quality Audit Findings ML20154H9651986-02-25025 February 1986 Forwards Nonconformance Repts Written or Closed During Jan 1986,per Memorandum & Order ALAB-106 ML20154D3581986-02-24024 February 1986 Confirms Items Agreed Upon in 860219 Telcon Re soil-related Issues.Util Will Discontinue Monitoring Dike Groundwater Wells During Shutdown & Site Maint.Authorization Given to Seal Weeping Wall Crack ML20198H2401986-01-24024 January 1986 Forwards ALAB-106 Monthly Rept for Dec 1985,including Bechtel Nonconformance Repts,Quality Action Requests,Mgt Corrective Action Repts & Quality Audit Findings ML20136F4771985-12-31031 December 1985 Forwards PNL-5718, Review of Tdi Diesel Generator Owners Group Engine Requalification Program,Final Rept, Technical Evaluation Rept ML20138Q5531985-12-31031 December 1985 Submits ALAB-106 Quarterly Rept 50.No New Individuals Assigned quality-related Duties Since 850930 Rept & No Const Activities Projected for Jan-Mar 1986 ML20136C5711985-12-20020 December 1985 Forwards Monthly Rept for Nov 1985,including Bechtel Nonconformance Repts,Quality Action Requests,Mgt Corrective Action Repts,Quality Audit Findings,B&W Repts of Nonconformity & Util Nonconformance Repts,Per ALAB-106 ML20138Q3871985-12-13013 December 1985 Ack Receipt of 851115 IE Bulletin 85-003, Motor-Operated Valve Common Mode Failures During Plant Transients Due to Improper Switch Settings. Valve Operability Program & Rept Scheduled to Be Completed Prior to OL Issuance ML20137Z1481985-11-27027 November 1985 Advises That Response to 851029 IE Bulletin 85-001, Steam Binding of Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps, Inappropriate at Present Since Plant in Surveillance & Maint Status.Schedule for Response Will Be Provided When Status Changes ML20137F2541985-11-25025 November 1985 Forwards ALAB-106 Monthly Rept for Oct 1985,including Bechtel Nonconformance Repts,Quality Action Requests,Mgt Corrective Action Repts & Quality Audit Findings,Per 730323 Order ALAB-106 & Amend 1 to Cp.Svc List Encl ML20138J4431985-10-25025 October 1985 Forwards Monthly Rept for Sept 1985,per Memorandum & Order ALAB-106 & Amend 1 to Cp,Including Bechtel Nonconformance Rept,Quality Action Requests,Mgt Corrective Action Repts, Quality Audit Findings & B&W Repts of Nonconformity ML20138D0031985-10-14014 October 1985 Informs That Util Will Submit Schedule for Meeting Requirements of 10CFR50.62(d) Per Generic Ltr 85-06 Re QA Guidance for ATWS nonsafety-related Equipment When & If Project Reactivated ML20133F7581985-10-0808 October 1985 Informs of Plans to Physically Disable Equipment Installed in & About Evaporator Bldg to Serve Process Steam to Dow Chemical Co,Per 850925 Resolution.Equipment & Structures Abandoned Are non-Q.Related Correspondence ML20137Y7921985-09-30030 September 1985 Submits Quarterly Rept 49,per ALAB-106.No New Individuals Assigned to quality-related Duties.Const at Plant Shut Down on 840716.No Const Projected for Fourth Quarter 1985.Next Quarterly Rept Will Be Submitted by End of Dec 1985 ML20133A3141985-09-27027 September 1985 Forwards Review of Section 4.7 of Technical Evaluation Rept PNL-5600, Review of Resolution of Known Problems in Engine Components for Tdi Emergency Diesel Generators, Reflecting Views Re Crankshafts for 16-cylinder Engines ML20133H1261985-09-25025 September 1985 Forwards Bechtel Nonconformance Repts,Quality Action Requests,Mgt Corrective Action Repts & Quality Audit Findings Written or Closed During Aug 1985,per Condition of Memorandum & Order ALAB-106 ML20138S0731985-09-17017 September 1985 Advises That Addl Excavation Between Tank Farm & Auxiliary Bldg Will Be Conducted Per NRC 850826 Authorization. Excavation Needed to Provide Supplemental Cathodic Protection.Svc List Encl.Related Correspondence ML20133H8841985-09-16016 September 1985 Discusses Ee Kent Allegations Re Plant,Per Encl . Decision Reflected in NRC Should Be Reconsidered. B Garde & T Devine of Gap Unwilling to Testify for Kent.Kent & Counsel Unable to Produce Expert Witnesses ML20140G8331985-08-23023 August 1985 FOIA Request for ACRS Documents Re Facility ML20137F7061985-08-12012 August 1985 Forwards Listed Documents Written or Closed During Jul 1985, in Accordance w/730323 Memorandum & Order ALAB-106 & Amend 1 to Cp.Only Nonconformance Repts Encl ML20133L8331985-08-0909 August 1985 Forwards Attachment 1 to Revised Exhibit D of Revised Compliance Filing & Application for Authorization to Issue Securities.Plan Is Requirement of Agreements W/Banks to Restructure Outstanding Debt.Related Correspondence ML20132B1841985-07-19019 July 1985 Forwards Monthly Repts for May & June 1985 Per Condition of 730323 Memorandum & Order ALAB-106 & Amend 1 to Cp.Related Correspondence 1989-04-28
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20210S9971986-10-0202 October 1986 Requests Change in Facility Svc List Address to Ref Address. Related Correspondence ML20211E3271984-10-0101 October 1984 FOIA Request for All Documentation,Including Notes,Ltrs, Memoranda,Computer Printouts & Data Compilations Re Board Notification 84-149 Concerning Investigation Repts on Comanche Peak ML20101U5541984-06-15015 June 1984 FOIA Request for All Agency Records Generated in Connection W/Dg Eisenhut 840524 Request for Addl Info Re Structural Adequacy of Plant Diesel Generator Bldg ML20112E4681984-05-22022 May 1984 FOIA Request for Documents Re Meetings Between Members of Nrr,J Kane,H Singh,F Rinaldi & Others Re Resolution of Diesel Generator Bldg & Implementation of Recommendations or Conclusions from Brookhaven 831021 Rept ML20084K8631984-05-11011 May 1984 Forwards Intervenor B Stamiris Second Supplemental Proposed Finding & Conclusions of Law Re QA & Mgt Attitude Issues & cross-reference to Previously Filed Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law ML20084Q3491984-05-10010 May 1984 Requests That J Keppler Respond to Listed Issues Re Evaluation of Facility Completion.Caseload Forecast Panel Evaluation of Plant,Taking Into Account Issues Discussed, Also Requested ML20084L6261984-05-10010 May 1984 Questions J Keppler Statement That Util Projected Schedule for Finishing Unit 2 by Dec 1986 Attainable & No Caseload Forecast Panel Evaluation Planned.Objective Caseload Forecast Panel Evaluation Requested ML20090K6941984-05-0202 May 1984 Expresses Belief That Intervenors Govt Accountability Project,Lone Tree Council & M Sinclair Represent Small Minority of Community Persons Not Wanting Plants Completed & Operating.Majority of People in Favor of Facility Operation ML20112D2991984-05-0202 May 1984 FOIA Request for Documents Re Insp of Auxiliary Bldg ML20084N3611984-05-0101 May 1984 Presents Differing View from M Sinclair Re Safety Concerns. Closing of Plant Would Result in 5,000 Lost Jobs & Create far-reaching Economic Hardship Throughout Community ML20090K7211984-04-30030 April 1984 Expresses Belief That Intervenors Govt Accountability Project,Lone Tree Council,M Sinclair & B Stamaris Represent Minority of Community Persons Not Wanting Plants Completed & Operating.Majority in Favor of Operation ML20084K6471984-04-30030 April 1984 Contends That Govt Accountability Project,Lone Tree Council, M Sinclair & Representatives of B Stamiris Do Not Represent Majority of Midland County Population ML20084M6381984-04-30030 April 1984 Contends That Intervenors Govt Accountability Project,Lone Tree Council,B Stamaris & M Sinclair Do Not Represent Midland County Community,As Intervenors Claim ML20090K7121984-04-30030 April 1984 Expresses Belief That Govt Accountability Project,Lone Tree Council,M Sinclair & Representatives of B Stamaris Do Not Represent Majority of Midland,Mi as Claimed ML20084K3711984-04-30030 April 1984 Contends That Govt Accountability Project,Lone Tree Council, M Sinclair & Representative of B Stamiris Do Not Represent Majority of Midland County Population ML20100F5011984-03-0606 March 1984 Supplemental FOIA Request for Four Categories of Documents, Including Trip Repts to Region III or Facility & Vaugh Index ML20087P0531984-01-30030 January 1984 Discusses Encl Newspaper Article Re QA Problems at Facility. Increase in Number of Inspectors at Plant Requested ML20080T6271984-01-17017 January 1984 Appeals Denial of FOIA Request for T Novak Notes Generated by or During Visit to Glen Ellyn,Il to Discuss Ofc of Special Cases Findings Re Facilities from Sept 1982 to Dec 1983 ML20083N2151984-01-0909 January 1984 FOIA Request for Documents Generated by Kane or Singh for Evaluation of BNL Rept Re Diesel Generator Bldg at Facility ML20084S1421984-01-0909 January 1984 FOIA Request for Documents Re Executive Notice 83-69 on Facilities ML20079Q6931983-12-30030 December 1983 Requests Cessation of Radioactive Matls Discharge Into Tittabawassee River.Synergistic Effect W/Radioactivity Increases Cancer Possibility ML20082N9291983-12-0505 December 1983 Forwards Stamiris Exhibit 140,consisting of Applicant Responses to Stamiris Interrogatories 14,28,31 & 19(a). Applicant Two Sets of Supplementary Responses Should Be Filed W/Aslb.Svc List Encl ML20086Q4011983-11-26026 November 1983 FOIA Request for Agency Records & Info Generated in Connection W/Or as Result of T Novak Visit to Region III Ofc to Discuss Ofc of Special Cases Findings on Facilities from Sept 1982 - Dec 1983 ML20080B2781983-11-26026 November 1983 FOIA Request for Records Generated in Connection W/Ta Rehm to Bp Garde Re Midland Caseload Forecast Panel ML20086Q2611983-11-26026 November 1983 FOIA Request for Documents Re 831025 Meeting Between Util & NRC Concerning Mgt Audit & Associated 10CFR2.206 Request ML20078R5091983-10-31031 October 1983 Commends Util Efforts to Develop Employee Assistance Program to Deal W/Employee Substance Abuse Problems.Pressure Should Be Placed on Remaining Contractors & Subcontractors to Develop Similar Programs ML20080S7061983-10-13013 October 1983 Expresses Concern Re Discrepancies in Const Completion Schedule.Public Meeting Warranted in Light of Varying Completion Dates ML20086J3781983-09-28028 September 1983 FOIA Request for IE 800103 Rept Re Review of Matl False Statement at Facilities,Associated & Supporting Records to Rept & Repts Prepared in Response ML20080J5801983-08-19019 August 1983 Requests Answer to Question Raised During 830811 Public Meeting by B Stamiris Re NRR Review of Const Completion Plan & Individuals Consulted.Appointment of Independent Geotechnical Consultant to Review Work Suggested ML20078K8791983-08-10010 August 1983 Appeals Denial of FOIA Request for Documents Re Caseload Forecast Panel 830419 Meeting on Plant Const.Denial Effectively Denied Bulk of Documents Requested ML20077J4501983-08-0808 August 1983 Requests Names of Review Team Members,Methodology & Plans for Public Participation Re Review of R Landsman Concerns Over Structural Adequacy of Diesel Generator Bldg ML20078G9471983-08-0808 August 1983 FOIA Request for All Records on re-review of Structural Adequacy of Diesel Generator Bldg Subsequent to May Testimony of R Landsman in ASLB Proceedings ML20082G3931983-08-0505 August 1983 FOIA Request for Records on 830615 Briefing of Commissioners Re Facilities ML20078K1741983-08-0505 August 1983 FOIA Request for Documents Submitted by Util for Consideration of Candidate Companies or Methodologies to Perform Const Implementation Overview of Const Completion Plan ML20078K8921983-07-11011 July 1983 FOIA Request for Documents Re Caseload Forecast Panel 830419 Meeting on Plant Const ML20077F3151983-06-22022 June 1983 Forwards Govt Accountability Project (Gap) Rept of Gap Investigation Into Region V/Nrr Effort on Former Bechtel Employee Allegations Re Welding Practices ML20071P8951983-06-0101 June 1983 Requests Info Re Total Number of Wells & Amount of Electricity Required to Operate Wells for Dewatering ML20024B0931983-05-31031 May 1983 Ack Receipt of Response Re Independent Audit of Facility. Truly Independent Audit Should Include Full Scope Overview of Completed Const Done by Third Party Rather than Util ML20076B0961983-05-16016 May 1983 FOIA Request for Matls Re Release of Draft Insp Rept to Util from Region III Dealing W/Startup Test Program for Facilities ML20023C5171983-04-21021 April 1983 Requests Assurance of Independent Agent to Perform Facility Audits,Per NRC 830419 Reinsp Order ML20069L1531983-04-19019 April 1983 Responds to Informal Discovery Questions Re Insp Repts, Deviation Repts,Attachment 10 Repts & Return Options in QA Sys.Containment Chipping Incident Was First Identified as Noncompliance by Region III During Oct-Nov Team Insp ML20090F1921983-04-18018 April 1983 Discusses Subcontractor Employee Concerns Re Unqualified Personnel at Plant Site in Jobs of Critical Importance to Safety,Poor Installation & Lack of Worker Qualification on Zack Design.Investigation Requested ML20024D7271983-04-0505 April 1983 FOIA Request for Documents Re Incineration of Radioactive Matls by Dow Chemical Co at Facilities ML20072S6431983-03-30030 March 1983 Supports Halting of Nuclear Legacy & Opposes Plant Opening Until Permanant Nuclear Waste Storage Method Devised ML20072M3921983-03-29029 March 1983 Requests to Make Limited Appearance Statement at 830329 OL Hearing ML20072M5911983-03-25025 March 1983 Supports OL Issuance ML20072M6371983-03-25025 March 1983 Voices Support for Startup of Facility ML20073E3811983-03-25025 March 1983 Expresses Outrage That Confirmed Items,Indicated in Tera Corp Re Independent Design Verification of HVAC Equipment Directly Affecting Control Room,Not Reported to Nrc.Details Should Be Provided to NRC & CPC at Same Time ML20072H6481983-03-25025 March 1983 Requests to Testify at 830329 Hearings ML20072T3481983-03-25025 March 1983 Ack Receipt of Re Tera Corp QA & Engineering Plans for Independent Design & Const Verification Program. HVAC Sys Adequacy Determination Methodology Requested.Info Distribution Requirements Should Be Clarified 1986-10-02
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _
~
Wendell H. Marshall '
MAPLETON INTERVENERS RFD 10 Midland, Michigan 48640 g l
<'y,(/.
8 Ns - !
< G; .:, .
April 1, 1982 S e.s 0 V
APR 901982u -
'U uzaNDQglp*
44 a )N Mr. Ronald W. Hernan (
Licensing Project Manager 4 [?>
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation fo 3 \\
, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Washington, D.C. 20555 i
Dear Mr. Hernan:
Enclosed are additional questions from the Mapleton Interveners relative to the Consumers Power Company Midland plants 1 and2, Dockets number 50-329 and 50-330.
These additional questions are sent to obtain answers because of the safety and health implications. We request that the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission review these questions and provide us with complete answers, for we feel that the job is not being well done.
i Yours very truly,
~ x Wende 1
/&f& tolaM President, Mapleton Interveners Marshal WHM/ sit cc: Sec'y, Nuclear Regulatory Comm. Mr. Steve J. Gadler, P.E.
Docketing & Service Sec., NRC Zane M. Goodwin, P.E.
Charles Bechhoefer, Esq. Mr. Robert H. Carson, Ph.D.
Mr. Ralph S. Decker U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Resident Inspectors Office Jerry Harbour, Esq. Ms. Barbara Stamiris Michael I. Miller, Esq. Mr. Myron M. Cherry, Esq.
Ronald G. Zamarin, Esq. Mr. R. B. Borsum Alan S. Farnell, Esq. Mr. Don van Farrowe James E. Brunner, Esq. Mr. Walt Apley Ms. Mary Sinclair Mr. James G. Keppler Stewart H. Freeman P. McCallister, P.E.
Mr. Robert W. Huston Frank J. Kelly P'
I(
i 8204090153 820401 PDR ADOCK 05000329
, G PDR
, . . _ - - . , . . . . - . - . _ . . _ . _ _ , _ , . _ _ - _ . _ . _ _ _ . , _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . ~ . - _ . _ . _ . , , , . - -
~
Steve J. Gqdler, P.E. 2120 Carter Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 Telephone: 646-5005 Gkh March 30, 1982 Mr. Wendell 11. Marshall Mapleton Interveners RFD 10 Midland, MI 48640
Dear Wendell:
Please find enclosed questions prepared from enclosures 1 and 2 attached to a letter from Ms. Elinor G. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch #4, Division of Licensing, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Docket numbers 50-329 and 50-330, dated November 30, 3
1981. This letter and attachments were sent to Mr. J. W. Cook, Vice President, Consumers Power Company by Ms. Adensam of the NRC.
- .The two enclosures mentioned in the above paragraph address the j matter of a request for additional information on generic "un-resolved safety issues" at Consumers Power Midland Plants 1 and 2, as well as other .,nclear power plants in the United States.
- It behooves the NRC to address the questions contained herein because so many of them concern the public health and safety, and especially the people living in the Midland area. I am certain that the NRC will not attempt to gloss over the serious-ness of the plant's defects. .Certainly the NRC, the regulating federal agency, cannot give a license to the Midland plant, for as Dr. Edward Pryzina says, you would not send an astronaut into space in a space vehicle with a deficient nose cone.
I suggest that you send this list of questions to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to the attention of Mr. Ronald W. Hernan, Licensing Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Regula-tion, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C. 20555.
Sincerely, i
j Steve J. " l.er SJG/ sit
E'iCLCSURE 1 - EUEST FOR ADDITICNAL INFORnATICN.
(Enclosures 1 and 2 are attachments to a letter frcm Ms. Elinor G. 1densam Chief Licensin6 Branch No. 4, Division of Licensing, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Dockets Nos. 50-329/330) dated November 30, 1981), to Mr. J.:!. Ccek.
ENCLOSURE 1 Page 1. Paragraph 1 (Par.1)
Question: Where can we obtain a copy of NURIG-06C6 " Unresolved ,
Safety Issues" (Also c alled the " Aqua Book"). Also, earlier documents such as NUREG -0510 and NUREG - 0410.
Par. 2.
- Question: How many " Unresolved Safety Issues " have been identified to date in the United States? In the rest of the world? i How many have been resolved to date? (both generic and ;
non-generic? ).
How many nuclear power plants in the United States are operating today with serious " Unresolved Safety Issues or problems" ? How many of these plants have received construction and/or operating licenses from the Nuclear Regulatory Agency (NRC)?
Question: Has the Midland FSAR been updated as requested by NRC?
If so, Where can we obtain this material?
ENCLOSURE 2 Paga C-1 Par. 1, 2, & 3 Questions: What is the basis for the decision (by NRC) as to whether a newly identified safety issue or problem should be treated as one having generic implications? Who makes this decision and what kind of empirical evidence is used?
Question: What is the justification for allowing any =uclear power plant construction / operation in the face of identified serious " Unresolved Safety Issues"?
Question: What magnitude must an "Unredolved Safety Issue" reach before it triggers a shutdown of construction or operation?
Who makes this decision? What empirical evidence is used?
Question: What actually triggers the decision that the " safety" significance of a given problem does not prohibit continued operation or construction of the plant while the longer term generic review is under way?
Page C-2 Par. 1.
Question: How does the NRC define " undue risk" How are unresolved generic and non-generic safety problems factored into this decision? Who makes this decision and what empirical evidence is used?
question: To what extent will generic safety evaluations be allowed 4 to dictate specific requirements or needs of individual l plant fadilities? J
, _ -- _ _ _ . - _ , - _ . . - - - - - - . . - , . _ _ _ _ . , _ . . - - _ _ . + - _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
-- -v-e
Page C-2 (continued)
Question: 'iho makes the determination concerning the relevance of a particular generic or non-generic problem with respect to a specific nuclear plant?
par. 3 Question: Has a Task Action Plan been prepared by Censumers Power for Midland 1 and 2?
Question: If a Task Action Plan has been prepared by Censumers Power for Midland 1 and 2, has it incorporated the following:
- a. Have they described the investigative program which must be undertaken with regard to the problem (safety) ?
- b. How long will the program take?
- c. Will any interim measures be necessary pending completion of the investigation by NRC?
- d. Will the suggested program plan produce effective results?
- e. Have alternative courses of action been suggested by Consumers Power, in the event the program plan does not produce the anticipated results?
Par. 4 " .. In short, the board (and the public as well) should be in a position to ascertain from the SER itself- without need to resort to extrinsic documents % the staff perception of the nature and extent of the relationship between eacn significant unresolved generic safety question and the eventu-al operation of the reactor under scrutiny" Question: What specifically is the (NRC) staffs perception of the nature and extent of the relationship between each signifi-cant unresolved generic safety question? What empirical evidence is required?
Question: On what bacis did licensing board make the decision to permit continuation of constructicn in the face of the serious unresolved safety questions, both generic and non-generic?
In view of the many unresolved safety questions identified to date;
- a. Have any of these safety problems been resolved for any U.S. reactor to date? If so, Please specify and describe.
- b. Was there a reasonable basis for concluding that a satisfactory solution will have been found before a given reactor was to be put into operation?
- c. Will the safety proble= have immediate or eventual safety implications? If so, what alternatives have been identified now, at this time, before the reactor is allowed to operate?
Question: 'Jhat is the basis for allowing the reactor to operate even though it is now known that a safety problem will or might be found in the future? How is " undue risk" defined in this situation by the NRC? Please describe in detail.
3_
Page C-3 " Unresolved Safety Isaues" Question: Pursuant to Section 210 (PL 95-2C9), has the NRC developed a plan to implement all identified corrective measures relative to unresolved safety issues (generic and ncn-generic) for the Consumers Power Midland 1 and 2 plant?
Uhere can we obtain a copy of this plan? (For each unre-solved safety issue? )
luestion: " . . . In reference to Section 3 on page C-3. ... House amendment which required development of a plan to resolve generic safety issues, including priorities cssigned to each issue.."
Has the NRC developed such a plan (if different from the above plan) for Consumers Power Midland 1 and 2 plant?
If so, please indidate where we can obtain a copy of this plan?
Question: How many unresolved Section 210 safety issues have been identified to date (March, 1982) for all U.S. nuclear plants including Midland 1 and 2?
question: Is the NRC Program for Resolution of Generic Issued Related to Nuclear Power Plants designed to focus on only broad safety issues or can it focus on specific narrow unresolved safety issues as well? Give an example using the Midland 1 and 2 plant.
Question: Since the NRC generic issues program in effect pre-empted the U.S. Congress's enactment of PL 95-209, does the NRC program ine:ude all requirements mandated by Congress? If not, which ones have been left out and why?
Page C-4 Par. 2 Question: What was the basis on which the NRC determined which nuclear power plant issues qualify as " Unresolved Safety Issues" and are reported to Congress? Are there any other kinds of safety issues which have not been designated as such by the NRC and not reported to Congress? Please describe and use examples to clarify this point.
Par.4 Question: " Reference here is to the section in quotes beginning with "An unresolved Safety Issue is a matter...." l Question: Does " matter" have to affect a number of nuclear pcwer plants to qualify under this definition?
Question: How does the MRC determine if it is dealing with an "important" question concerning " adequacy"? Who determines if the question is "important encugh"?
Question: How is adequate defined by the NRC? (as it relates to existing safety requirements?)
Question: How does the NRC evaluate if a proposed unresolved safety issue involves conditions "not likelv" to be acceptable?
e- ----- r -
r- , , - , - - . + . - - - 7
page C-6 (continued)
~
Question: Where can we obtain answers to the above ouestions?
Question: Where can we get a copy of the " Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Unresolved Safety Issues Summary, Aoua Book"?
Does this book contain any information on Midland 1 and 2?
If yes, please describe and list this information.
Question: If, during the course of a given year, certain " Unresolved Safety Issues become " Resolved", how is such information disseminated? How can we 6et on a mailing list to assure that we obtain current information?
Page C-7 Question: How current is this list of "New Unresolved Safety Issues?"
(i.e. since 19797)
Question: Where can we obtain a copy of NUR3G - 07057 question: Where can we get a copy of Section 10.4 3 SER discussing effe t of water hammer on steam generator feedrings?
(Pa e C-8)
Could not such problems (i.e. water hammer effects) have been anticipated by the design engineers? Could they not have been uncovered by the manufacturer before a packaged nuclear power plant was sold to Consumers Power, for example?
Question: (Re: A-3) Could not this corrosion been forseen by metallurgical engineers and prevented?
Does the United States send astronauts into space in a space vehicle which has a nose cone which will melt when exposed to the sun?
Page C-9 Question: Is it really ethical for the NRC to allow the nuclear power industry to use the people as guinea pigs by allowing the industry to experiment and do research at such great cost to the public (health and safety) , ie. major decrease in degree of protection of public health and safety and then try to compensate for the public health and safety loss?
par. 2 Question: '4 hat specific sections are being referred to here? SER cited but incomplete.
Question: How much of the basic research on such items as steam generator tubes does tne nuclear industry actually do on their own?
Question: How much of such research is conducted at university laboratories?
At public expense?
Question: Why is the nuclear industry not forced to werk out technical and engineering problems in their own laboratories and work cut the bugs before they are allowed to build nuclear power plants which the NRC knows will have " Unresolved Safety Problems which will predictably impact the public health and safety?
+ e v - -
4
[ Page C-9 (continued)
Par. 3 Question: dho decides what appropriate action will be taken in the event of steam generator tube degredation NRC? Manufacturer?
Owner / Operator of the Ilant?
Question: Who decides how "aceropriate actions " is defined? Is such decision made on a case by case basis cr does it become generic? If so, who makes that decision?
Page C-10 Par. 2 Question: Yhere can we obtain a copy of SER Section 15 3 5?
Question: Where can we obtain a copy of the 1980 -81 ATWS issue which was scheduled for rule naxing in midsummer 1981?
Par. 4 Question: What assurance at this late date can NRC give that in the event of ATWS malfunctions, that the Emergency Core Cooling System will operate?
Question: How does this generic problem relate to and affect the Midland 1 and 2 plant?
Question: What specific unresolved safety problems have been identified at Midland 1 and 2 by the NRC? By Consumers Power?
! and how are they related to A-9 and A-ll?
C-ll Par 4 Question: How is fracture toughness evaluated to assure that the nuclear power plant can be operated without " undue risk "to the health and safety of the public?
Par. 5 Question: (Re: A-12) Why could not the toughness of the different steels have been determined by the manufacturer under simulated conditions of temperature, pressure, etc.?
Question: Why han it taken this long for the NRC and the manufacturers of nuclear power plants to discover the problem with reassessment of fracture toughness?
Are there perhaps other problems which the NRC and the manufactureres of nuclear power plants are aware, but have not yet revealed to the public relative to additional decrease in protection of health and safety for he public?
If the answer to the above is yes, please let us know all additional newly discovered " Unresolved Safety Problems "
connected with reactors.
Par. ?
Question: Is Midland 1 and 2 included in NUREG -0577? Where can we obtain copies of this document?
.w-- -,
. -7_
Page C-12 Par. 1 Question: Has the final implementation plan for NUREG 0577 been completed?
If so, where can we obtain a copy?
Par. 3 Question: (Re: A-17) Are NRC conclusions sensitive to the certainty of an unresolved safety problem which is expected to occur in the future and cause a " Major reduction in protection of health and safety of the public for which public must somehow be compensated? If not, then why not? Please explain.
page C-13 Par. 4 Question: On specifici11y what basis other than sheer speculation can the NRC give the public " reasonable assurance" that the effects of potential system interaction on plant safety will be within the effects on plant safety previously evaluated? (evaluated by whom?).
Question: How does the NRC define " reasonable assurance" in this instance?
Question: How does the NRC finding on A-17 impact on operating license for Midland 1 and 27 Par. 6 Question: Is M 4 dland 1 and 2 one of the plants being re-evaluated re-garding seismic desing criteria? If so, what information is currently available to us?
Page C-14 Par. 3 Question: (Re: A 43) How does Containment Emergency Sump Reliability as an unresolved safety problem impact on Midland 1 and 2 construction and operating license?
C-15 Par. 4 Question: (Re: A 44) Wi') the Station Blackout unresolved safety problem impact the Midland 1 and 2 plants? How did Consumers Power propose to resolve this problem?
Question: Where will Midland 1 and 2 obtain offsite electrical power?
Under what circumstances? Is there a written committment?
Ques; ion: Where can we obtain a copy of SER Section 8.2? 8.37 C-16 Par 3 Question: How will the fact that Midland 1 and 2 is a cogeneration plant and will supply the Dow Chemical Company with steam, affect its ability to participate during an emergency to utilize steam to drive a steam turbine utilizing auxiliary feed-water system in the event of total on-site and off-site electrical failure?
Question: Where is NRC review of auxiliary feedwater system design described?
pr -
w - - - - - ,-- - - - ,,
Faga C-17 Par. 3 question: Where is the NRC review of Decay heat removal (i.e. Section of SEP? )
question: What problems regarding heat decay removal are anticipated at Midland "I and 2?
par 7 question: (Re: A 46) Dees Midland 1 and 2 anticipate having any problems with seismic qualification of equipment? If so, please explain? Is Midland 1 and 2 on a fault zone?
C-18 Par. 1 Question: Will Midland 1 and 2 be able to be brought to a safe shutdown condition in the event of a seismic accident?
Par. 3 Question: (Re: A-47) What does the NRC mean when it states that "It is generally believed " by the NRC staff that such control system failures would not lead to serious events or result in conditions that safety systems could not handle"?
Are there times when NRC does not generally believe this?
If so, under what circumstances? Please cite example.
Page C-19 Par. 2 Question: Why has NRC chosen to permit nuclear power plant operation, especially in view of their statement:
"A systematic evaluation of the control system design, as contemplated for this (serious, significant) unresolved safety issue, has not been performed to determine whether postulated accident could cause significant control system failures which would make the accident consequences More severe than presently analyzed" question:
..c.
What consequences will this decision have on people from Midland?
Par. 3 question: On what basis can _NRC give " reasonable assurance" that the Summer Unit can be operated? (safely? ).
Question: What impact will the NRC decision have on Midland 1 and 2 and the health and safety of the public living in Midland Michigan?
Page C-20 Question: Cn what basis can NRC issue an operating license to Consumers Power in view of this serious, significant, unresolved safety problem, thereby jeopardizing the health safety of the people in Midland, Michigan?
_ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _