ML20045E164

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Final Rule 10CFR70,72,73 & 75, Minor Amends to Physical Protection Requirements
ML20045E164
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/24/1991
From: Shelton B
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
To: Sharon Hudson
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
Shared Package
ML20044B465 List:
References
FRN-57FR33426, RULE-PR-70, RULE-PR-72, RULE-PR-73, RULE-PR-75 AD03-2-011, AD3-2-11, NUDOCS 9307010200
Download: ML20045E164 (2)


Text

y AD o3-t

[

- UNITED STATES

[

o g-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS ON k

  • [j

~$-

i WASHINGTON, D, C. 20555 MUN 2 41991 iss

~

HEMORANDUM FOR:

Shirley H. Hudson Information Management Coordinator; Office of Nuclear Regulation Research Robert L. O'Connell..

Information Management Coordinator Office of Nuclear Material Safety and' Safeguards FROM:

Brenda Jo. Shelton,. Chief Information and Records Management Branch.

Division of Information Support Services-Office of Information Resources Management

SUBJECT:

COMMENTS ON FINAL RULE, 10 CFR PARTS 70,.72, 73, AND 75, " MINOR AMENDMENTS.TO THE PHYSICAL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS" Our review of the " Federal Register Notice" for the subject final rule indicates-that the Paperwork Reduction Act Statement-is correct ~and there is no'need to modify the related "Information Collection Requirements: OMB Approval" sections as a result'of this rulemaking. However, as a result 'of a separate effort to compile a~ complete listing sf NRC reporting and recordkeeping requirements, we noticed some inconsistencies in several~'of'the:

recordkeeping. requirements that are included in~this rulemaking. Our initial-plan was to request guidance on the issue when we circulate the listing for-review and comment, but s;nce we are commenting on the final rule, we are surfacing the issue now fo, your consideration.

We found what appears.to he inappropriate retention periods-(three ' years) for changes to the " Physical St.curity Plan" pursuant t'o section 70.22(k), and-the

" Safeguards Contingency al Procedures" pursuant.to section 70.32(g). These are inconsistent with rete 1 tion periods cited elsewhere in the regulations.

Sections 70.32(g), 73.46(h), 73.50(g)(1), and 73.55(b)(4)(ii) direct licensees-to retain changes to documents, such as the " Safeguards Contingency Plan" and the " Guard Training and. Qualification Plan, for the same period 'of time as the main dacument,'normally until termination of-license or for the duration of the pcssession of the licensed material. The superseded material is retained for three years after a change is effective, not the new changes. Sections 70.22(j)(3) and 70.32(d) and'(e) also contain this discrenancy in retention requirement.

9307010200 930512 N57 33426 PDR

)

SHudson,.g

?

If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact Michael Collins on extension 28044.

da S

t

, Chief Information d ecords Management Branch Division of In ormation Support Services Office of Information Resources Management cc:,SeTurel,!RESg P. Dwyer, NMSS s

I