ML20044D424
| ML20044D424 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/16/1993 |
| From: | Selin I, The Chairman NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Synar M HOUSE OF REP., GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS |
| References | |
| CCS, NUDOCS 9305190111 | |
| Download: ML20044D424 (85) | |
Text
.
s
'o, UNITED STATES
['
g 'j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
- g
\\.. /
April 16. 1993 CHAIRMAN The Honorable Mike Synar, Chairman Subcommittee on Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Government Operations United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.
20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
i I am pleased to provide the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's initial response to questions posed in one of your two letters of March 25, 1993, regarding your Subcommittee's review of the activities of the NRC in the regulation of Agreement States under i
Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act and NRC practices in the regulation of materials licensees.
I have enclosed a list of the questions for which answers are being transmitted to you at this time.
We expect to provide answers to the remainder of the questions by the end of this month.
j Sincerely, A K-
\\
Ivan Selin
Enclosures:
As stated cc:
Rep.
J. Dennis Hastert (w/ enclosures) l
(,M 3
9305190111 930416 I
1 PDR COMMS NRCC I
l CORRESPONDENCE PDR i
r
(
LISTING OF SYNAR QUESTIONS TO WHICH RESPONSES ARE PROVIDED FOR APRIL 16, 1993 REQUEST Questions lA, 1C, ID Questions 2A, 2B l
Question 3A Questions 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E Questions 6A, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E Questions 8A, BE Questions 9C, 9D, 9E Questions 10A, 10B j
e
o OVESTION la.
Copies of all NRC letters, States' responses, confirmatory j
communications, and supporting documentation including questionnaires, review comments, and review findings for all biennial program reviews and interim reviews for the following States for the period 1987 to the present:
Alabama Kentucky Kansas Louisiana Mississippi New Mexico Texas i
Arizona California North Dakota Washington ANSWER.
The following docuT,ents are provided in response to this request:
ALABAMA Letter dated June 18, 1987 to Claude Earl Fox, M.D., State Health Officer, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated September 2,1987 to Carlton Kammerer, Director OSP, from Claude Earl Fox, M.D., State Health Officer, Alabama.
Letter dated October 21, 1987 to Claude Earl Fox, M.D., State Health Officer, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
18th Regulatory Review Report and Staff Evaluation of the Alabama Radiation Control Program for the period of November 22, 1985 to May 1, 1987.
Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
i i
I OVESTION la.
(Continued) 2 Letter dated June 7, 1988 to Aubrey Godwin, Director, Alabama, from Richard Woodruff, Regional State Agreements Representative, Region II.
l Memorandum dated November 1, 1988 to Joel Lubenau, Acting Assistant Director, State Agreements Program, from Richard Woodruff, Region II.
Letter dated September 19, 1989, to Claude Earl Fox, M.D., State Health Officer, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP with talking notes.
Letter dated November 8,1989, to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP from Claude Earl Fox, M.D., State Health Officer.
l 19th Report and Staff Evaluation of the Alabama Radiation Control Program for the Period of May 1,1987 to July 5,1989. Questionnaire is enclosed with j
report.
Letter dated May 30, 1990 to Aubrey Godwin, Director, from Richard Woodruff, State Agreements Representative, Region II.
Memorandum dated October 31, 1990, from Richard Woodruff, Region II, to Vandy Miller, Assistant Director for State Agreements Program.
Letter dated May 14, 1991 to'Aubrey Godwin, Director, Alabama, from Richard r
Woodruff, State Agreements Representative, Region II and questionnaire.
l Letter dated August 14, 1991 to Claude Earl Fox, M.D., State Health Officer, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
20th Regulatory Program Review Staff Report and Evaluation of the Alabama Radiation Control Program for the Period July 5,1989 to June 14, 1991.
Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
Letter dated January 13, 1992 to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP from Claude Earl Fox, M.D., State Health Officer.
.l Letter dated March 2,1992 to Claude Earl Fox, M.D., State Health Officer, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated June 15, 1992 to Aubrey Godwin, Director, Alabama, from Richard Woodruff, State Agreements Representative, Region II.
Memorandum dated August 3, 1992 to Vandy Miller, Assistant Director for State Agreements Program, from Richard Woodruff, State Agreements Representative, Region II.
ARIZONA Review Report:
21st Regulatory Review Report and Staff Evaluation of the Arizona Radiation Control Program for the Period of August 15, 1986 to July 21, 1988. Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
Letter dated August 12, 1988 to Charles Tedford, Director, Arizona, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated August 31, 1988 to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP, from Charles Tedford, Director, Arizona.
0
OUESTION la, (Continued) 3 Letter dated September 27, 1988 to Charles Tedford, Director, AZ, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated November 16, 1989 to Charles Tedford, Director, AZ, from Jack Hornor, State Agreements Representative, Region V.
Memorandum dated January 26, 1990, to Vandy Miller, OSP and Joel Lubenau, OSP, from Jack Hornor, RV.
Letter dated February 15, 1990, to Charles Tedford, Director, AZ, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated February 21, 1990 to Charles Tedford, Director, AZ from Jack Hornor, State Agreements Representative, Region V 22nd Regulatory Review - July 22, 1988-June 15, 1990.
Letter dated July 18, 1990, to Charles Tedford, Director, AZ from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, Letter dated September 11, 1990, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP from Charles Tedford, Director, AZ.
Letter dated October 8,1991, to Bruce Mayberry, Executive Assistant, Office of the Governor, from Jack Hornor, Region V.
Memorandum dated December 5, 1991, to Vandy Miller, OSP, from Jack Hornor, RV.
Letter dated August 5,1992 to Rita Pearson, Deputy Chief of Staff, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated October 30, 1992, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Rita Pearson, Deputy Chief of Staff.
Letter dated February 3,1993, to Rita Pearson, Deputy Chief of Staff, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
23rd Regulatory Program Review Report and Staff Evaluation of the Arizona Radiation Control Program June 16, 1990 to June 12, 1992. Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
CALIFORNIA Letter dated January 16, 1987, to Joseph Ward, Chief, CA, from Jack Hornor, Region V.
Questionnaire enclosed in report.
25th Regulatory Program Review Staff Report and Evaluation of the California Radiation Control Program for the period March 15,1986 to March 14, 1987.
Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
Letter dated May 29, 1987, to Kenneth Kizer, M.D., Director, CA, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
l l
t i
I OVESTION la.
(Continued) 4 Letter dated June 19, 1987, to Carlton Kammerer, OSP, from Kenneth Kizer, M.D., Director, CA.
Letter dated July 24, 1987, to Carlton Kammerer, OSP, from Jack S. McGurk, Acting Chief, CA.
Letter dated August 21, 1987, to Kenneth Kizer, M.D., Director, CA, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated October 23, 1987 to California File from Jack Hornor.
Letter dated March 9, 1988, to Harvey Collins, M.D., Chief, CA, from Jack Hornor, Region V for a pre-review visit scheduled for April 18-22, 1988.
Memorandum dated May 11, 1988, to California File, from Jack Hornor, Region V.
Letter dated January 19, 1989, to Kenneth Kizer, M.D., Director, CA, from Jack Hornor, Region V.
Letter dated April 21, 1989, to Kenneth Kizer, M.D., Director, CA, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated May 17, 1989, to Carlton Kammerer, OSP, from Kenneth Kizer, M.D.,
Director, CA.
Letter dated May 30, 1989, to Carlton Kammerer, OSP from Jack McGurk, Chief, CA.
Memorandum dated June 6, 1989, to Jack Hornor, Regional Agreement State Officer, from Donald Nussbaumer, Assistant Director State Agreements Program, OSP.
Letter dated July 7, 1989, to Kenneth Kizer, M.D., Director, CA, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated August 9, 1989 to Jack McGurk, Chief, CA, from Jack Hornor, Regional State Agreements Officer, Region V.
Letter dated December 28, 1989, to Robert Jackson, Associate Secretary, CA, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
26th Regulatory Review Report and Staff Evaluation of the California Radiation Control Program for the Period of March 15, 1987 to March 10, 1989 on August 9, 1989.
Questionnaire is attached to the report.
Letter dated February 21, 1990, to Jack McGurk, Chief, CA, from Jack Hornor, j
Region V.
1 Letter dated April 30, 1990, to the California File, from Jack Hornor, RV.
Comments and Recommendations dated July 21, 1990, from Richard Bangart, HMSS l
to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated November 19, 1990, to Kenneth Kizer, M.D., Director, CA, from Jack Hornor, Region V.
j i
1 00ESTION la.
(Continued) 5
)
Letter dated November 26, 1990, to Jack Hornor, Region V, from Kenneth Kizer, M.D., Director, CA.
Memorandum dated February 25, 1991, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Richard Bangart, HMSS.
Letter dated March 12, 1991 to Vandy Miller, Assistant Director, State Agreements Program, OSP, from Joel Lubenau, OSP, and Jack Hornor, Region V, Report and Staff Evaluation of the California Program, March 11, 1989 to January 18, 1991.
Letter dated March 20, 1991, to Kenneth Kizer, M.D., CA from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated April 5,1991, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Kenneth Kizer, M.D., CA.
Letter dated April 10, 1991, to Jack McGurk, Chief, Environmental Health Division, CA, from Jack Hornor, Region V.
l Letter dated April 26, 1991, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Don
+
Womeldorf, Chief, Environmental Management Branch, CA.
Memorandum dated May 7, 1991, to Jack Hornor, Region V, from Joel Lubenau, Senior Project Manager, OSP.
Letter dated May 29, 1991, to Carlton Kammerer, OSP, from Edgar Bailey, Chief, Radiologic Health Branch, CA.
Memorandum dated June 4, 1991 to Jack Hornor, from Joel Lubenau.
Memorandum dated June 6,1991, to Molly Joel Coye, Director from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated June 21, 1991, to Molly Joel Coye, M.D., Director, CA, from l
Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
l Letter dated November 15, 1991, to Molly Joel Coye, Director, CA, from Jack Hornor, Regional State Agreements Officer, Region V.
Letter dated November 15, 1991 to Molly Joel Crye, M.D., Director, CA, from Jack Hornor, Region V.
Letter dated January 30, 1992 to Vandy Miller, OSP, from Jack Hornor, Region l
Y.
Report and Staff Evaluation of the California Radiation Control Program for the Period January 19, 1991 to January 29, 1993.
KANSAS Letter dated January 13, 1987, to Jack Walker, M.D., Secretary, KS, from Robert Martin, Region IV.
\\
i OVESTION la.
(Continu d) 6 Letter dated February 19, 1987, to Jack Walker, M.D., Secretary, KS, from Robert Martin, Region IV.
Daily Staff Note dated February 19, 1987 from Robert Martin, Region IV.
l Letter dated March 19, 1987, to David Romano, Manager, KS, from Robert Doda, l
Region IV.
l Letter dated May 18, 1987, transmitting Review Report to David Romano, KS from l
Robert Doda, Region IV, attached 23rd Regulatory Program Review Staff Report and Evaluation of the Kansas Radiation Control Program for the Period July 26, i
1985 through January 30, 1987.
Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
Letter dated March 20, 1989, to Stanley Grant, Secretary, KS, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated August 29, 1989, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Gerald Allen, Chief, KS.
Letter dated October 18, 1989, to Gerald Allen, Chief, KS, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Memorandum dated February 13, 1991 to Vandy Miller, OSP, from Robert Doda, RIV enclosing Report and Staff Evaluation of the Kansas Radiation Control Program for the Period of January 13, 1989 to February 1, 1991. Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
Memorandum dated February 20, 1990, to Vandy Miller, Assistant Director for State Agreements, OSP from Howard Faulkner, Special Assistant to the Regional Administrator, Region IV.
Letter dated December 31, 1990, to Stanley Grant, Ph.D., Secretary, KS, from Robert Martin, Region IV.
Letter dated March 26, 1991, to Stanley Grant, Ph.D, Secretary, KS, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated August 23, 1991, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Azzie Young, Ph.D, Secretary, KS.
Letter dated November 21, 1991, to Azzie Young, Ph.D., Secretary, KS, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Memorandum dated February 13, 1991, to Vandy Miller, OSP, from Robert Doda, RIV enclosing Report and Staff Evaluation of the Kansas Radiation Control Program for the Period of January 13, 1989 to February 1, 1991.
Memorandum dated April 7, 1992, to Vandy Miller, OSP, from B.J. Holt, Region III and Richard Blanton, OSP.
Kansas Review Visit - January 28 - February 1, 1992.
Report and Staff Evaluation of the Kansas Radiation Control Program for the Period of February 1, 1991 to February 26, 1993. Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
l l
OVESTION la.
(Continued) 7 KENTUCKY Letter dated June 16, 1988, to Harry Cowherd, M.D., Secretary, KY, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
l l
Letters dated July 13, 1988, to Carlton Kammerer, OSP from Donald Hughes, l
Manager, KY and letter dated July 27, 1988, to Carlton Kammerer, OSP, from l
Harry Cowherd, M.D., Secretary, KY.
Letter dated September 29, 1988, to Harry Cowherd, M.D., Secretary, KY, from Carlton Kamerer, OSP.
Memorandum dated October 21, 1988 to Joel Lubenau, Acting Assistant Director, OSP, from Richard Woodruff, RII enclosing Report and Staff Evaluation of the l
Kentucky Radiation Control Program for the Period of August 15, 1986 to April 23, 1988. Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
i Letter dated April 12, 1989, to Donald Hughes, Manager, KY, from Richard Woodruff, Region II.
l Memorandum dated May 16, 1989, to Vandy Hiller, OSP, from Richard Woodruff, Region II.
Letter dated April 3,1990, to Harry Cowherd, M.D., Secretary, from Stewart Ebneter, RII.
Letter dated July 18, 1990, to Harry Cowherd, M.D., Secretary from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated November 9,1990, to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP, from Donald Hughes, Manager, KY.
Letter dated November 9,1990, to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP, from Harry Cowherd, M.D., Secretary, KY.
Letter dated January 4,1991, to Harry Cowherd, M.D., Secretary, KY, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Memorandum dated May 25, 1990, to Vandy Miller, OSP, from Richard Woodruff, RII, enclosing 26th Regulatory Program Review Staff Report and Evaluation of the Kentucky Radiation Control Program for the Period April 22, 1988 to April 27, 1990. Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
Letter dated March 14, 1991, to Donald Hughes, Manager, KY, from Richard Woodruff, Region II.
Memorandum dated July 8,1991, to Vandy Miller, OSP from Richard Woodruff, Region II, attached to Staff Report and Evaluation for the period April 22, 1988 to April 27, 1990.
Letter dated February 27, 1992, to John Volpe, Ph.D, Manager, from Richard Woodruff, Region II.
Questionnaire is attached to letter.
Letter dated March 13, 1992, to Harry Cowherd, Secretary, KY, from Stewart Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II.
I l
OVESTION la.
(Continued) 8 l
Letter dated June 16, 1992, to Leonard Heller, Secretary, KY, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Talking Notes for Kentucky phone call - no date.
r Letter dated July 13, 1992 to Carlton Kammerer, OSP, from Leonard Heller, Secretary, KY.
Letter dated August 13, 1992, to Leonard Heller, 3ecretary,.KY, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Report Package on the 1992 Kentucky Review.
LOUISIANA letter dated October 20, 1987 to Martha Madden, Secretary, LA, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated April 3, 1986, to Robert Martin, Region IV, from William Spell, Administrator, LA.
Letter dated May 13, 1986, to William Spell, LA, from Robert Martin, Region i
IV.
Report and Staff Evaluation of the Louisiana Radiation Control Program for the Period of February 7, 1986 to September 4, 1987.
Questionaatre is enclosed in report.
i Letter dated November 22, 1989, to Paul Templet, Secretary, M.D., LA, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated June 11, 1990, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Paul Templet, Ph.D., Secretary.
Letter dated July 24, 1990, to Paul Templet, Ph.D., Secretary, from Carlton
)
Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Report and Staff Evaluation of the Louisiana Radiation Control Program for the Period of September 1, 1989 to August 23, 1991.
Questionnaire is enclosed in report.
Letter dated July 30, 1991, to Paul Templet, Ph.D., Secretary, LA from Robert Martin, RIV.
Letter dated October 18, 1991, to Paul Templet, Ph.D., Secretary, LA, from Carlton Kamerer, OSP.
Letter dated January 29, 1992, to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP, from Gustave Von Bodungen, Assistant Secretary, LA.
Letter dated February 21, 1992, to Gustave Von Bodungen, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
OUESTION la.
(Continued) 9 Letter dated August 12, 1992 to Hall Bohlinger, LA, from Vandy Miller, Assistant Director State Agreements Program, OSP.
Louisiaaa Review Visit October 5-7, 1992.
Letter dated June 4, 1987, to Alton Cobb, M.D., State Health Officer, from J.
Nelson Grace, Region II to setup review for June 15-19, 1987.
Letter dated July 21, 1987, to Alton Cobb, M.D., State Health Officer, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated August 5,1987, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Eddie Fuente, Director, MS.
Letter dated October 14, 1987, to Eddie Fuente, Director, MS, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Memorandum dated March 24, 1988, to Donald Nussbaumer, Assistant Director, OSP, from Richard Woodruff, Region II, enclosing Report and Staff Evaluation of the Mississippi Radiation Control Program for the Period December 20, 1985 to June 19, 1987.
Questionnaire is attached to report.
Letter dated May 31, 1989, to Eddie Fuente, Director, MS, from Richard Woodruff, Region II, to schedule review for July 31-August 4,1989. Attached to the letter is the questionnaire.
Letter dated July 3,1989, to Alton Cobb, M.D., State Health Officer, from Stewart Ebneter, Region II.
Letter dated September 28, 1989, to Alton Cobb, M.D., from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated November 22, 1989, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Eddie Fuente, Director, MS.
Letter dated December 19, 1989, to Alton Cobb, M.D., from Carlton Kammerer, l
Director, OSP.
Memorandum dated August 24, 1989, to Vandy Miller, Assistant Director, OSP, from Richard Woodruff, Region II enclosing 26th Regulatory Program Review Staff Report and Evaluation of the Mississippi Radiation Control Program for the Period June 19, 1987 to August 4, 1989.
Memorandum dated December 12, 1990, to Vandy Miller, Assistant Director, OSP,
)
from Richard Woodruff, Region II stating a mid review meeting was held on September 19-20, 1990.
Mississippi Radiation Control Program for the Review period August 4, 1989 to September 13, 1991.
OVESTION la.
(Continued) 10 l
l Letter dated July 10, 1991, to Eddie Fuente, Director, MS, from Richard l
Woodruff, Region II, to schedule review for September 9-13, 1991. Attached is the questionnaire.
l i
Letter dated August 12, 1991 to Alton Cobb, M.D., State Health Officer, from Stewart Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II.
Letter dated November 22, 1991, to Alton Cobb, M.D., State Health Officer, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated January 3, 1992, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Eddie Fuente, Director, MS.
i Letter dated March 2, 1992, to Alton Cobb, M.D., State Health Officer, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
j Letter dated September 30, 1992 to Eddie Fuente, Director, MS, from Richard i
Woodruff, Regional State Agreements Officer, Region II.
i Memorandum dated November 9, 1992, to Vandy Miller, Assistant Director, OSP, from Richard Woodruff, Region II re Mississippi visit.
j NEW MEXICO i
Letter dated April 8, 1987 to Mike Burkhardt, Director, NM, from Robert Doda, j
Region IV.
12th Regulatory Review Report and Staff Evaluation of the New Mexico Radiation Control Program for the Period September 15, 1986 to August 12, 1988.
Letter dated September 7, 1988, to Jon Thompson, Acting Director, NM, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated September 30, 1988, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Richard Mitzelfelt, Director, NM.
Letter dated October 25, 1988, to Richard Mitzelfelt, Director, NM, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Memorandum dated January 4, 1989, to Vandy Miller, Assistant Director, OSP, from Robert Doda, Region IV, enclosing Report and Staff Evaluation of the New Mexico Radiation Control Program for the Period of September 15, 1986 to August 12, 1988. Attached is also the questionnaire.
Memorandum dated May 11, 1989, to Vandy Miller, Assistant Director, OSP, from Robert Doda, Region IV regarding review visit held May 3-5, 1989.
Memorandum dated May 15, 1989, to Robert Martin, Regional Administrator, from Robert Doda, State Agreement Officer, Region IV, w/ enc 1.
Note dated June I, 1989, to New Mexico File from Robert Doda, State Agreements Officer, Region IV.
Letter dated June 2,1989, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Benito Garcia, Bureau Chief, NM.
-_~
OUESTION la, (Continued) 11 Letter dated September 7,1989, to Jack Ellvinger, Chief, NM, from Robert Doda, State Agreements Officer, Region IV.
Letter dated October 6, 1989, to Robert Doda, Region IV, from William Floyd, Program Manager, NM.
Note dated October 16, 1989, to New Mexico File, from Robert Doda, State Agreements Officer, Region IV.
Letter dated September 27, 1990, to Richard Mitzelfelt, Director, NM, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated November 26, 1990, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Richard Mitzelfelt, Director, NM.
Letter dated December 21, 1990, to Richard Mitzelfet, Director, NM, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
1991 New Mexico Review Visit - December 2-5, 1991.
Letter dated September 10, 1992 to Judith Espinosa, Secretary, NM, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP. Attached is Report of the Evaluation of Agreement State Program for August 1990 - August 1992. Questionnaire is enclosed.
Letter dated November 16, 1992 to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Judith Espinosa, Secretary, NM.
Letter dated December 18, 1992 to Judith Espinosa, Secretary, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
NORTH DAK0TA Letter dated March 18, 1987 to R. M. Wentz, M.D., ND, from Robert Martin, RIV.
Letter to Robert D. Martin, RIV, from Robert M. Wentz, M.D., ND, dated March 20, 1987.
Letter dated May 26, 1987, to Robert M. Wentz, M.D., State Health Officer, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated May 29, 1987, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Robert M.
Wentz, M.D., ND.
Memo dated June 25, 1987, to D. Nussbaumer, OSP, from R. Doda, RIV, re:
Report and Staff Evaluation of the North Dakota Radiation Control Program for the Period of October 25, 1985 to May 1, 1987.
Letter dated July 7,1987, to D. K. Mount, Director, Division of Environmental Engineering, Department of Health from R. Doda Region IV.
Letter dated May 23, 1989, to R. M. Wentz, M.D., State Health Officer, ND from Robert D. Martin, Regional Director.
Talking Notes for North Dakota 1989 Review.
OVESTION la.
(Continued) 12 Letter dated August 10, 1989, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from R. M.
Wentz, M.D., ND.
Letter dated October 3,1989 to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from R. M.
Wentz, M.D., ND.
1 Letter dated January 23, 1990, to R. M. Wentz, M.D., ND from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Memorandum dated July 14, 1989, to Vandy Miller, OSP, from B. J. Holt, Region III and R. Doda, Region IV re:
Report and Staff Evaluation of the North Dakota Radiation Control Program for the Period of May 2,1987 to June 9, 1989.
1 Letter dated July 9, 1990, to Robert Doda, RIV, from Dana K. Mount, P.E., ND.
Letter dated September 27, 1990, to Vandy Miller, OSP, from Robert Doda, RIV.
1 Letter dated May 10, 1991, to R. M. Wentz, M.D, ND, from R. Martin, Region IV.
{
Report and Staff Evaluation of the North Dakota Radiation Control Program for the Period June 9, 1990 to June 7, 1991.
Letter dated August 7,1991 to R. Wentz, M.D., ND, from Carlton Kammerer, l
Director, OSP.
Letter dated September 3,1991, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from R.
Wentz, M.D., ND.
Letter dated September 27, 1991, to R. Wentz, M.D., ND, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
North Dakota Review Visit September 8-11, 1992.
]
Memorandum dated September 16, 1992, to Vandy L. Miller, OSP, from R. Doda, j
State Agreements Officer, Region IV.
TEXAS j
Letter dated February 25, 1987, to Bill Bunch, from Robert Doda, Region IV.
Memorandum dated March 17, 1987, to Robert Doda, Region IV, from Donald l
Nussbaumer, Assistant Director, OSP.
Report and Staff Evaluation of the Texas Radiation Control Program for the Period of August 29, 1986 to April 22, 1988.
Letter dated June 13, 1988, to Robert Bernstein, M.D., Commissioner, TX, from i
I Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated December 23, 1988, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Robert Bernstein, M.D., Commissioner, TX.
Letter dated December 13, 1989, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Robert Bernstein, M.D., Commissioner, TX.
I l
l
OUESTTON h (Continued) 13 i
Letter dated March 6,1990, to Robert Bernstein, M.D., Comissioner, TX, from Robert Martin, Regional Administrator, Region IV.
Report and Staff Evaluation of the Texas Radiation Control Program April 22, 1988 to April 20, 1990.
Memorandum dated May 2,1990, to William Fisher, Chief, Nuclear Materials Licensing Section, NRC, from Robert Doda, Region IV.
l Memorandum dated May 3,1990, to Ramon Hall, Director, Uranium Recovery Field Office, RIV, from Robert Doda, Region IV.
l Letter dated June 6,1990, to Robert Bernstein, M.D., Comissioner, TX, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Memorandum dated July 2,1990, to Carlton Kamerer Director, OSP, from l
Richard Bangart, Director, LLWM/NMSS.
i Letter dated July 27, 1990, to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP, from Robert l
Bernstein, M.D., Comissioner, TX.
l Letter dated August 31, 1990, to Robert Bernstein, M.D., Comissioner, TX, i
l from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated September 19, 1990, to David Lacker, Chief, TX, from Robert Doda, State Agreements Officer, Region IV.
Letter dated March 6,1992 to', David Smith, M.D., Comissioner, TX, from Robert Martin, Regional Administrator, Region IV.
i Letter dated March 16, 1992, to Susan Ferguson, Director, Texas Water Comission, from Robert Doda, State Agreements 6fficer, Region IV.
Report and Staff Evaluation of the Texas Program Review March 9-13 and 23-27, 1992.
Talking Notes for Texas Call - no date.
l Note dated May 8, 1992, to Bob Doda, Region IV, from Richard Woodruff, Region II.
l l
Letter dated June 16, 1992, to David Smith, M.D., Comissioner, TX, and Jesus l
Garza, Executive Director, TX, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated August 4,1992, to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP, from David Smith, M.D., Comissioner, TX.
Letter dated September 18, 1992, to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP, from Jesus Garza, Executive Director, Texas Water Comission.
Letter dated September 30, 1992, to David Smith, M.D., Comissioner, TX, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
I
~
OVESTION la.
(Continued) 14 Letter dated December 15, 1992, to Ms. Diane Tefft, Administrator, NH, from Ruth McBurney, C.H.P. Director, Division of Licensing, Registration and Standards, TX.
Letter dated December 31, 1992, to David Smith, M.S., Comissioner, TX, from James Milhoan, Regional Administrator, Region IV.
Evaluation of Agreement State Radiation Control Program State Review Guidelines and Questionnaire.
Letter dated March 23, 1993, to David Smith, M.D., Comissioner, TX, and Jesus Garza, Executive Director, Texas Water Commission, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
WASHINGTON Letter dated March 2,1987 to Robert Rolfs, Acting Chief, from John Martin Regional Administrator, Region IV.
Letter dated March 7,1987, to Robert Rolfs, Acting Chief, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated July 15, 1987, to Terry Strong, Head, from Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated August 19, 1987, to Donald Nussbaumer, Assistant Director, from T.R. Strong, Chief.
Draft letter dated September 17, 1987, to Terry Strong, Chief, from Donald Hussbaumer.
Letter dated March 14, 1988, to Terry Strong, Head, from Donald Hussbaumer, Assistant Director, State Agreements Program, OSP.
Letter dated August 4, 1988, to Terry Strong, Chief, from Jack Hornor, Regional State Agreements Officer.
Letter dated November 25, 1988, to Robert Rolfs, Acting Director, from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated December 19, 1988, to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP from Carole Wasburn, Acting Director.
Letter dated December 22, 1988, to Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP from T.R.
Strong, Chief.
Technical Assistance Request dated January 4, 1989, to Vandy Hiller, Assistant Director from Carole Washburn, Acting Director.
Letter dated January 31, 1989 to Carole Washburn, Acting Director, from i
Carlton Kamerer, Director, OSP.
Memorandum dated January 31, 1989, for Malcolm Knapp, Director, NMSS from Vandy Miller, Assistant Director.
OVESTJON la, (Continu:d) 15 Letter dated March 31, 1989, to Carole Washburn, Acting Director from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated October IS, 1989, to Terry 5trong, Chief, from Jack Hornor, Regional State Agreemeats Officer.
Memorandum dated March 14, 1990, for Vandy Miller, Assistant Director, from Richard Bangart, Director, NMSS.
Letter dated May 10, 1990, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP from Gary Robertson, Head, WA.
Letter dated May 23, 1990, for Kristine Gebbie, Secretary from Jack Hornor, Regional State Agreements Officer.
1 Memorandum dated September 6, 1990, for Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP from Richard Bangart, Director, OSP.
Letter dated October 25, 1990, for Kristine Gebbie, Secretary from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated November 26, 1990, for Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP from Kristine Gebbie, Secretary.
Letter dated November 27, 1990, for Terry Strong, Director from Jack Hornor, Regional State Agreements Officer.
Letter dated December 10, 1990, for Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP from T.R.
Strong Di sctor.
Memorandum dated January 31, 1991, to Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Jack Hornor, Regional State Agreements Officer, Region V.
Letter dated March 8,1991 for Kristine Gebbie from Carlton Kammerer, Dir?ctor, OSP.
Letter dated June 18, 1991, for Kristine Gebbie, Secretary from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated October 18, 1991, for Kristine Gebbie, Secretary from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated November 21, 1991, for Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from Kristine Gebbie, Secretary.
Letter dated December 26, 1991, for Kristine Gebbie, Secretary from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated January 28, 1992 to Vandy Miller, Assistant Director for State l
Agreements Program, from Terry Frazee, Supervisor, WA.
l Letter dated March 3,1992, for Terry Strong, Director, from Vandy Miller, Assistant Director.
l
^
m
~
00ESTION la.
(Continu:d) 16 i
l Letter dated March 3,1992, for Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP, from T.R.
Strong, Director.
j l
Letter dated March 18, 1992, for Kristine Gebbie, Secretary, from Jack Hornor, i
Regional State Agreements Officer.
f l
Letter dated April 9,1992, for Kristine Gebbie, Secretary from Carlton j
Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Washington Review Report dated August 24, 1990 to July 17, 1992.
Letter dated August 21, 1992 for Kristine Gebbie, Secretary fron. Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
Letter dated September 11, 1992, for Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP from Kristine Gebbie, Secretary.
Letter dated October 20, 1992, for Kristine Gebbie, Secretary from Carlton Kammerer, Director, OSP.
j
Enclosures:
l As stated i
i B
i l
l l
l
i OUESTION 1.c.
Copies of all NRC All Agreement States letters and communications sent to all Agreement States, or subgroups of Agreement States, within the past five years.
ANSWER.
The following copies of NRC All Agreement States letters and communications with Agreement States within the past five years are enclosed.
li l.
State Agreements Index of all correspondence from January 1,1988 through December 31, 1988.
2.
State Agreements Index of all correspondence from January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989.
l 3.
State Agreements Index of all correspondence from January 1,1990 through December 31, 1990.
4.
State Agreements Index of all correspondence from January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991.
5.
State Agreements Index of all correspondence from January 1,1992 l
l through December 31, 1992.
l Enclosures-As stated I
i
I
- f..
[
t l,
Fsp Lt.
I I
l:..,..
j l
[,
r; I. ATE U'O rEi G L SUE:E:t CATEE;Et
{:
P I
p 0;f 03'iE iki 5 EC *T lhT 3f4TIDN E TICE EB-33 SFEC-2T CAMERA 0
- 01< W ii ;AE Ik:IEKii C TIFT N! Nt.C C: IE:]!EETS 0
- 31/07/E5 M LLk ;*il'.'!T:E!
LLE VDi.*E5 AG A* Tis! TIE! FDR SITE!
O t
E! FEE;ECE f
I
- 01/1:li! LA*
!!I 55DCAiLCSUEBi-1 0
I 01'*1/!E Ui E!:.
SSD CATE053E ES-02 0
i a
t*J:2!!! Ui 55; CATECEUE ES-03 0
l Cil e!!!
"L lt Ik!FC NEW ITArF MEPJER 0
- 1:~:i! in
!?
C*:EF M* :FV!h3 LI:ENSEE it 3F 0
. +,,;;..
. p t...;t. at.-
p.v.;~e. g 0
w
- i II : =
t.k ukI ? E V*Lifli AN* A*il'eiilEi 0
e...: ::.::
... t; A.' *v" !E E2-04 0
t.
- . r. v:c: ::
o.,,
0,
": si II L.!
5TATI: ELIrIh*!:F FAIUEE5 0
,"......., I E14....... Lh..
- ::. 3
... : m.. -. :.
. e.r-,.
e i: ;i si Si
- ii I.!*!
It:FT FEB;*.GT::f SSILE 1.4 FEVI!*3 - CEs*Es A O O
(
....,:g8
- . :.. :.:.:.....: ;;..;~;-.;+
- ...n,...s i r..:,.:..
c
(
4......
'. : ;;-il.1 h.:?E:
If.4!!F* EE%IER LI:EKSE - FE!!!I V
(-
l
- .~.
- ..
- ::
.......:.. :..g:y.c: C 3TA".nai u'"A *F 0
u FA:ll: TIES i
- .c.. ::...::
- g,m
- c.e :.:.p.
r
- c:. *: ui h;; 0;;E*3 M IE:. -1E-i! 5;5FEGINI :*3 AUTC EITY 1
,E
,a..L.... F....
...,l..,ra.h.!..........,.
l
- r:n ;.4
- m. :..
o. c:.a::..
JP
..h:...e.. t.,..A..r:
n..> M..- : k: er.: e. Ik.s er-
- t
.r ss i
i
....-e ::.....:
- +
- ::.37 3
i
- p..:.::.:.::
.c.. g:.;:
3
- ** !! Si 3M EICEFil f. E!TE:1A j
1
':/!: !! I':
EE!ULi! 3F !LT'.'EY 3 *. I'0 SEE!Ei ETAil; O
ELIMIL.iCRIIVICES
(!!(i,I!L;i SEL C?iE EJE fi-09 0
3/ICliLA*-
E5D CATEDBUE ES-10 0
Ci:4'il Ni
- M 3M STAT!; ELinth*TDES 0
L3/14 '1! IE ELL LC551NE DF#T STACAED REs!EW F1AK FD; ELL LCE!!KE 0
DFERATIDNS -REVIEt A C CCtMENT G il5?i! Ai ESI E!D CATECELE E!-11 0
C/22/i! UI SSD CATALD5JE Ei-12 C
G/:Ci! L Ai kh -F 3EK F.EA*itt.5 REStDN!!!!LITY FDR BYFRCU:T MATERIE IN ON-P0EK 0
REA:TDRS (4/17eE! IM CFSTii LISTINE DF D' MART BEE;E LICEN5ED BAUSES C
till? Ei L1:
!!L 55; CATE CEUE !!-17 0
M'1* 'i! 93 3
I;!It CJE if AI5UE*CE JE EA :ATI0h THEiWY 0
9 r s.>:.:
g:
e: Cgse.a.: r g.:.a i
..s e
s
.c.,,.A.. r.c.. r.:,,9 C
. -.. ~ e :..:
- u
. i.
m..
{
5%ii Ui
',K ETATIC EL:51f.AT3 UF; ATE c
.I'1I.i! $**
IFE I. N! UE.I.3E EA }Cik I.Y IEA}k}K3 [DUEEE Ab'.2',lh[Ef1EI O
- i. s. o < '.:.: Lt.:
c.:.e~.P a k.' *w.e ::.~
As.
L. 66 0
,e..,~::...
,g.,
.. w s.
... :, A7. a,.e E.,1M k..... Ur.k.,E o
- Letters that are missing from file.
1 i
1
, - -. _.. _, _ _ _ _ _,. ~.. _ _ _... ~. _,
.....~s
t i
Fr;s k:.
2 l
IE ff E:
CL GE:EEMIET 5* ATE 10D
- if 42Tr**.
EC'.:
5.T E 7 CATE53EY
- 5/11tE3 LAP
!!D SED CATL05UE BE-21 '
0
- 05!!!/!! LAi 3r.UP: ATE O
05!1:JEi LAP SD SSD CATALD5% BE-22 0
C5/21/E! G 5 EE5k:r3FF kEC CDP.'!ENTS Oh 'LIVINE WITH3UT LAOFILLS 0
05T*!'E!LAl 3M 3M C0FIRMATD:YDREER 0
M/ tlii IM 3M 3M STATIC ELIMIhATDR UPLATE 0
06/:His Dr.
IM ICl?Ih1 FI53LATORY ASSESEaINT OF 3M ICIDEkT 0
1
- .T 15!!! ths 5FE 2-T ht: B ALETIN B6-M ACTIDNS TO PE TAKEN FDR THE D
TEAESFDETAT]CN 0F EDEL C. SPEC 2-T FCDiG:H]: EIF:5)8E IEVICE i
h!!~i!! di F;:,720 LETTER FR0" A*ES Oh FEDFDSEE FB1!!DWI 0F 10 CFR 0
a h *17,5! ni E*:*:1EI 6Asi!
E*A C8t!F;F DE FIIEE WASTE ;IE:?.ATIDE 0
': :: 55 ::
fi *EET:h5 AW.;R ALL AftIEME%T Sid TIETINE C
ic t !! !?s E. ~ 5 TEC %I:A. F Eli!;N Ch E1E8:NATE CDCEkiUT DN O
Lir!*5 (8: *S) FDE i;n:L*, t. LLS i
it: ** 'E5 65
- A:* 20 Fa*T 2? FE'.*15D FIEC EEE 0
- :' !! 22.
IF; '.:'.* *:lE!E TF :kN 0 FSE nGLCE*iG 5:5 AC 0 L WEL'.
0 i
LCi!!NS
- '.i '* S ?! of TFai::;*n:L.
TA:,si?"Fisilts :tJ EE 3 C 2C E*I T 0
( !rI* *h T*::NN E:v.E:*.E TEU:,1;,7 !!!!IEE F0: F6Ei 5.!!F E:EE TE;1Ch5 J
C;;t1E5 0: :~ /I! Gi II.***-:!!D'.:h3 FC:::-II IATAIAIE DN LI:EN!EE SITE! L'CEE5*N 0
!!::*.MI!!!Cf.!WE l
!i '.**.!!! L'i EG:F:EFENT Kt E!:CATEI EF;**E*Iai A~i1C'.
0
...........r r.*.n*.E - e. c :-:
G
- ..< r..:;.
- c.
e.
it.!C!!:e FEi&AT3:A!!!!! MEET 0
l G T 52 LAI E N 01 C T::E *F C LAT!DN-5f C t 0
- -'
- !!!E :i TEA:E N ~LE!E TEA:h h5 COL *RIE ANCCEMEE' EG1CD:. FUTECi'DN O
A% JCEFEC EEi:EEERIA!
E sslE! ;F6 TI:i C A; i 5:710k FIEA. Iu?T 'TE* HCL FDil!IDk Dr FIkACIAL 0
GA!.!JM A!!JACE5 FDR EE;LiaAT!DE,STAf!LIZAi!DN, PEC0C AMlhAT]DN AC ldh 5-TER*,
SUFSEILLAES'JVEILLACE AC CDCE% OF UEAK!uM REC 0kTRYFA*lLITIE5' 7/ Cite!LE 7,M M STATIC ELIMIEATDE5 0
'7/07/Ei LM
!!I ;Ait DiUE
!!DCATEDE*,iEEE-24 0
- 7/12/E!IG IECCP.MI551DE!EE DECDMM:55DLINS - FIht R3LE O
' */DIEE LU SED CATED5DE SED CATE05LT BE-25 0
- -7/14I!! LG APIOMEET TD FEES PRDFED AMEOflEET TD TEE 5*HDIE 0
l 17/24'Ei KE!
CLES A Wt!TE SC IESTECTIDN STANMC5 AG PECDURES FDR 0
SDLI:!FID CLASS A UN5TAELE EASTE STFIAr.5
'Jt18/EE rG LLt EEETIW55 LLW I:5FC54 FIBULATCEf MEETIK55 C
- 7/ DE! 21 EVEET AEEEErIET STATE EVEG STATG TELE
- 0EFERECES 0
TELE 2GEFICE5 37/*.Il5E 20.
FEER.gAgg g;iER:t LI:EEEEE SFETY FEEF::.r,'CE EVCAi!0E o
Ert U T!:n F C T055 FCICEE
- J':1 TEE LE M:TEFIts MATEE! ES C C'J.!A!!L:T7 0
C :;' Ai!LITY
- D!:'iE! Cf.
.ti C UKEE FRIED LLN CL'?II AC A:T VITIES FDK THE !!TES C
l
- Letters that are missing from file.
t
~
Ti;t k;.
!! '!E.1:
ALL A5FIEFIK' STATE ICEI
!*TE A"TCE KEY G L SL1!ECT CATEIDEY
~7C7tES Im LUi!1F'RikiDES F0FCSED R!LE IN EAREE IEEIATD:.5 - REVIEN AND 0
CDMMEhT l
05/04/Ei LAP S D CATE CSUE E5D CATEDUE li-26 0
hit 10is! 21 FI!C UFk!hi FDICF.01DCTIVERATER!ALSNARNING 0
Gl!C!!! JL WE57 CHl:AfD CDM513510k DGER DN EST CHl:ASD 0
CE/10lEi 2.
Eh!!TY GOfE5 NEUTF.DN DD5E FATES FRDM DEK51TY 6AU6ES 0
!!>12iffth!
Ih*CEMAT E k Ci!CE KR: th?DEE;!!Dh ETICE O. BF-62: RECEET FICINES 0
i E--12 CDh*ERLINS IMPLEMENTATIDW DF GUALITY A55' ACE FCERats !Y SUFPLIERS DF J
TF A!PChi F R u iES
!!::E:Ei'.41
!!D *t'CDEG
!! *ATEDE'E Ei-27 0
J Fi li li :'
E*;;Mir.E:A:Y IhFD*NT!DN CDNCERh!Ki ECLICCLT MACMHEEAFY 0
5%5CE5 Of ;i !! ::.
NTIF:Ri LICENIEE5 TRIAL E" FCEEAM F;E EARLY IIENTIFICAT!"N OF 0
l EATEE!E ! LI;Eh!EES kEEDIK5 G i ATTEET!DN (i:: IE %
h:Ci::lt:GT!!N k:CIS Flt: C :!DN lh FEH EE LY A!!!!TED CCif.!ESICW D
FF:EEte!
IIf:1 !! :P FFII F::ir.1 'i!
FEEi~E!Fi!LI VEE 5J5 FEEFDF?ik:E-5ASED FIEAA!!CEE 0
FEi~ :Sh*E 1
- 2 Pii E 5:.; TA:.II.55 CUETC:i #G LDK5 ?EEE CA~E D~ UFAlit EILL 0
i iA!L!hii 5:iES
.1 0! Ei *?
M*EilRI45 DE!!*E EA95A RED EEM*.TE A~TEEDE!hi EVKE!
0
- I !! Ei EFIE*
L;6 ~~':RT LLb tutFA;T DI!*F.!iJTICN 0
~;i. : !! u.i P : FE;i!E;T LLk FDFCID EXE TC FIAEEEni KE:'S AJiRRITY FDR 0
FFE:it F FE 'iIki CN!!TE LLN DliF~5C Ik AEEEEEEt,T STATE 5 1
(i.' lii ~ ~ N EETIFIMEh!
FFJWELL 0
CiJ:1/i!LA!
! K :& TALC 5.I fi-Il 0
Md:.E! ik b;:t FI!F;k!E Fi2 CIRUC Dh NA;M 0
- il:Lii J!
ES: CATALD5)E BE-29 0
S!(Ei!!L*!
!!!CATEDBUE E!-20 0
N!Miii t AI
- 5~;5E CF WA5iE F M: dig C.E FDR DISF;3AL OF N;5fE DIL BY 0
DIL lht!NEFAIDE
- 1118/12 LA!
Ai FIETINF ABEEEriNT STATES EETIN5 0
09/3/E! Cr'.
i!3K5!h5CDUESE 19EE IWiEC:UCTIDW TD LICEN51N5 CDASE D
M/li!E!LAi SE E D CATALDEUE Ei-31 0
Dillf/EE DM LUIE IEEC IAiDRS EJIDACE DN LARBE IREADIATDR APPLICATIDG 0
MI :tEi IF6:
CL'S O RK5HDP DN EL*5 0
W ::!EE :DL ICIENT FI5FCKEE REVI!!DN TD NRC RESPDN5E PLAh FDR IE!ENTS 0
PLAN IWDLVING NU; LEAR MATERIALINUkAUTORl!ED PLCES 0?l23/E! DE RCIDP64ARMCIEE EYEDR RUIDPHAEEEIES 0
08/27/E! Crm h!C ENVIEALLDY HIC CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIACE O
+M,:743LG E!D SED CATALD5UE BE-32 0
M!!?/E! M TU!KIh5CD2EE TEAlkIES CDURSE ANC3*EMNET 5 EEK CDAEE 0
M/ E 55 LG
!!I
!!DCATED5UEBE-33 0
Mi2i/E! 1:KS EEC CDtf.I!!!DE BEIEFINS ON THE ETATUS OF ZFFDETS TD 0
DEVELDF A PR: PD;!CY D:130!!! CHE HI:
ENVIRALLOY Hlt CERTIFI;&TE Dr CDMPLIACE C
10fa!! LG TII::A.LI*ENEEE EE;1CE LICENSEE SJFVEY 0
2Df12/!i te".
LLW FIETIES LLh DISPD5R EEB'JLATDRY KITlki ABEEA 0.
20!!3:f5:.83 ED CATED6UE El-34 0
- Letters that are missing from file.
Fa;f f.:.
4 I
O! 2: :-
1 A.L ASFIEMENT STATE IhIE1 i
i f
\\
- iE AGCE EE4*C SL'i:E:7 CATE!!F' 4
2CIII/II CM*.
HIC ENVIFELD) Hit CERTIFICATE DF CDE?l! ACE O
I 10/12/25 L;?
FILICR GA MEETIN5 DN MEDICAL GA 0
i 0/19'E! CHM IAEA TRAN!PLRTAi:Di iRAh!FCETATIDE REBULATIDES COMFATAIILITY 0
I's/:lli!LAI 550 55: CATALC5]E 66-35 0
I 1 :5/E! LA?
555 CCEDEUE EE-34 0
i 11/CilE!185 SE2 55D CATE DEUE BE-37 0
l 1 /:!/iE ;;.
K:.: INEFECI:i N:. DUE!r:CATID% ER!TERIA FOR INEFECTSES 0
D.'1.!FI:ATIDN
- 1/01/E! LAI FHf!!OAh LI:ENSIN5 PHYSICIAN LICEKIIN5 0
t
!!!L3'il :L Vir. MFDIKTEEET A:FDINiEEC OF VAGY L. MILLER A5 #35!STANT 0
IIEE:7CE FDR ST;TE A5EEEEEET F C SRAM!
- 2. '*Z 'Ei 2:L II IF:::N'rIKT FE!!E III STATE ABEEE*i C 5 0FF :ER 0
- i:!lli ;I TE.ETHE:F:?
TE.EiriEF;:Vr.:5CE!\\l5TF;T: Chi C
.: !. fi 2.';
5;
,a.v..::.. :
- <*Ti! "
- E'.!:*i SCIE!
E20:Ai!3C :We.ET EC:!.ED CEEIK3 SATELY W11e 0
h...,.........v..t. e.u:
- *: !! ni FI.:Ei 5;:*E.1AE!
D ;Fi FI'i:5!*N CF TrE 'EsI:-ELINES F3F NE: FIV!EK 0
- Alt.EE*i G !!;*E EC i;i:*!. ::WTE*L F':!:A*5
[
, :.....t.:
4 g... g ;...... p.,,,.,.\\ Mt....
.m i
O
... c.::.
I:t;;/i! ni r:lE: di E E:: C.A:.!T!:t:I*s 0* ICER:*. ET:.ius ;JR1rltAi]C:.
O EE!)!FE*ECS F:E T*E e4 **.*0.,5 C:KFDNEKT! Or l
F'::0R TIVE E!!E! EA5iE
.:':: !! !'I LLi L::EM E ;*.:7 IE;T*t. KEVG' LLk *:EF !E LI:Eh5E-A*:I 12 0
... -...e:
....s.r...oss E.: **
0 I
c 3:*::* ;F*J:E7::'.S t. :::E [r IkiEhi 13 EE;i!ES5 fJ: FIEL*T!;a5 AO 0
FO.!:tChifFC*U:TFCILFNA*?A:IUT1;A.c I
- 4*:I! L;I
!!:-;FEF0ET 0
- !! !!.Ai
- E;;CG C';*lE TFA:hIh3 ID.?l! AhC.CEEEhi fil: CAL UEE5 0
l
- / I II ***.
b.::
EAi:FRLDfH:tCEFTIF:CATE OF C05.FLIACE 0
{
j; :E !! L'i r.!!!O.3:!TFA*! M IUri FK Cil*E CCCAIAIN3 A Fall: GA EAE AC 0
As* 9 EEF]RTI M K.iLE C2tFFIG TEE CUREEKI r.I5E*:ESiiAi!DL RJLE A G A GA REEULATDEY l
BUIDE J~/13!!!LAI SED CATALDSUE BE-39 0
!*/1;i!!LA) 55D SSD CATALLBUE Bi-41 0
12/13iEiLAI
!!3 55: EATALE5JE B5-43 0
-i
~/E!! LAi 553 ESD CATALDBUE 65-42 0
1*/26 IE 1AI
!!D 55DCAiR35UEBE-43 0
12/15/28 LAE SID SED CATALDBUE SE-44 0
4 12/;1/E2 LAI SEL ESD CATALD5UE BE-45 0
l 1:/ 2/E5 LA?
55:
SSD CATR OSUE BB-46 0
2:/ 3/E! LAI ICILECS ICIDENT OTIFItai10NS 0
1
- / 7/55 th5 EE:
WRC'S FCFD5ED PCilCV STATEMEET DN EIEEFTIOKS FROM 0
EE5L'LATCRY C0hiCL, ANACE CTICE AC
}
F.EETIh2 12/IE EE LAI EID ESI CAT C EUE 55-47 0
(
- 1*/3.Si!I" 3t LI57IN3 0F L*5T 3M STATIC ELIFINAiDES 0
- Letters that are missing from file.
i l
l 4
Letters that are added to file that were missing from list L
4 Fa8e so. 5 2
04/09/92 ALL AfREDElrf STATE INDEX i
DATE ADTER EEYW:3LD SUSJECT CAT 30 CELT 03/25/88 JM.
FC 85-9 Standard Review Flan for Source Materials Licenses (Revision) 03/28188 1AB SSD SED Cetale8ue (98-13) 03/2b/88 LAB Course Inspection Procedures Course i
03/28/88 US Ouidance Guldence ao TA Requesta fram States and Campacta 04/01/88 1AB SSD SED Catalo8ue (88-14) 04/12/88 JFK Draft Technical Position an Alternate Cancantration Limits for Uranium Milla 04/18/88 1AB SSD SSD Catalogue (88-15) 04/18/88 1AB SSD SED Catalo8ue (84-16) 04/18/88 1AB M
Weekly Report on 3-91 06/03/88 ERS Sotice 88-33 NBC Information Sotice 84-33: Recast Problaan Involving the Model Spec 2-T Radiographic Raposure Device i
06/06/88 1AB Raminder Reminder Re: Sotifying NRC of Incidents 06/07/88 CEM LIM 1me-M el Weste Volumes and Activities for the Sites 06/07/88 LAB Training Trainin8 and Experience Criterie-90edical l
06/08/88 DIDi 3M Re8ulatory Assosament of 3M Incident 06/08/88 D5 Elt Commments IDLC Co m te Entitled "Livin8 Without Landfills" 07/01/88 LLW Low-Level Waste Compact Distribution 07/28/88 CIDS LLW Revloed Low-Level Weste Volumes and Activities for the Sites 09/29/88 EPA EPA Clarification of Interim Status Qualification Requirements for t.be Basardous Components of Radioactive Mixed Waste i
f as l
l i
1 s
l I\\
iho ic' I
p.
l 3I/II/60 HH 10H3 30111I!!
MUTIH 111110
!ID!!!!!!liHS 301li D 1 303i' i
31/01/36 H3 MU1TlliHICH11801U' IIS OZ/IS/36 fO f01 3
i M/39/36 ilE' MSF!fT13U1 TSS' fO
//
HS 1!'30'Ai'11 fU 3I/39/36 lI51031HIU H1iIDilS fO
//
10 1U OI/li/16 III ICI' 3 M 00 300 a/0 H 7 fO
//
10 A11 SI/!t/36101015110H5Mf fO
//
10 lli l
Gi/t6/iS 11M HIH11013HS iH iD' 11S OZ/li/86 11S S]'li'11 115 t
i 01/16/36 3SQ 0 1V1021 I H 10
//
fO 1U 01/I6/96 II HSI' 0130I01 lI3' iC
//
10 f01 GI/I3/3611 H2IDI SH11H111 fO
//
10 f01
?
l 3I/?3/36 TOM 1111H310110 10
//
10 11$
3I/?L/16 III SSU' IMOH' lliM ittM 90
//
10 HS M /IL/36 5V 114 12i H llit fO
//
10 HS 3
2I/!1/36 SG 011109H 1M fO
//
fO 1U l
SI/ti/96115I1 DA' H1V))H!03!11 10
//
fO f01 i
M/JI/!S DITC!11 ECIMHS !IM!I 10
//
10 M
D /;tliS SSC 0111051 i M 10
//
fO lif 02/U /H 522 01110SH i H fO
//
iC 111 G/R / H iS sI1~ t M I MIT11 ITI' 10
//
10 llI D!!'
t U/U/36 330 01110E1 IH 10
!/
10 1fE D /U /36 351 0 1710E1 I M 10
//
10 1U h!/U/96 D11 JCI E0!! niilliMIA' 11$
OZ/II/96 fO liS 30 I!03 3?/01/16 !!!TCITlU !!! SSIHT SU iC
//
80 M
i 3Z/3 /16 1I171 !i!! 3Z U S i %1!!
10
//
10 DE 3s/21/36 SSC U IT10SU i M fO
//
d0 111 3?/H/96 IGI]11 iiHCAil iC
//
1C lli 3I/I3/f6 lif 1 Z ' i M E H 03~ H 733' fO
//
10 UE 1H 3t/II/36 0011110f.3 D!!!fIDliM fO
//
10 UE SI/iZ/16 33G 0lfi0SU iM fO
//
10 1iE 3;/tt/36 N {H D LID 1!I1$ AI3115 iO
//
10 f01 3Z/?)/96 H1' 33 litO 101103H 01113' 10
//
10 M
3Z/It/16 D11HIU H1iI]111$
fO
//
10 lit 33/!1/16 il GiMi 01 IU!0SliHII fO
//
10 f01 3t/0t/36 ICIID D11IIS 103103' I]301 10
//
10 f01 3t/0t/16113f111002 IHTGIT!08 10
//
10 f01 3t/01/i6 HT11 SH1lil TID 1il i!0SIH HS 3t/tI/36 fO H
II 3t/!f/f6 SSC D1710EI 86-6 10
//
10 113 3t/11/16 336 01110SH 1HO 10
//
10 1U i
3t/tO/1630111311133013IHG 10
//
IC f01 f t/IQ/36 I131 i!000211$ 30H31 ill' fO
//
10 f01 3t/!i/t6 lli 11 E 03G 1311 01 liS 05/09/96 10
!IS 311110 l
!ii!35I015 llf 3t/t0/96 SU 371110SU IMI 10
//
10 1U M/0t/361IS!I!!SICCS IC
//
liS
)
M/H/16 554 D17105 10
//
1U M!IZ/26 532 D1710$ IME fO
//
lit H/!)/16 36 01110S iHI fO
//
10 lli l
MliL/if fIdil !011 HC 111111111153 10 i/
10 113 M/19/IS 33G 01Y1001ML iG
//
10 lli i
ba22aas aye2 eaa m;sspuS ;aom Jpta-
i ihsno' t
GI/II/60 l
111 TS11HH1 SliH tunis -- 1616 3'
HH 1HIJ Dii!!!!
MiWIH 11111U HDIIIIS S17115 30117 G 8 3013' i
H/10/361130 Mil IH liGl0SITiH 11S H/05/16 10 3H 30 H/!0!iE TIH3T1:1 il 1331130051$ fO
//
10 HH U/39/16SIG311110SIMI 10
//
gO 118 9/36/16 T1USillaS ITiH fO
//
50 f01 H /10/36 !ilf SOI11II H 3011 10
//
10 f01 n/II/16 HTI111S SD' u is 10
//
10 1U l
H/II/i6SUifil01ilI!011QIHSS fO
//
10 1U O/?1/26lIS111IAS!035 10
//
10 115 9 /H /36 IIIII0H 1i H 01 llA 7 6 iO
//
10 DE 3!illE 33/U/!!iiH 10173131 < V155 3 10
//
10 liS 33/IZ/li 3iG U H 10S I M I 10
//
10 11H i
33/I3i!! ti 301T511110 5liH1S 10
//
10 II 33/tiliS HE0iHI 10 !3 IMI 10
//
10 tE 33/II/is IH5 10
//
lli li tM D /II/16 H C 30051 fi.s' ST3 i 0I1 X HS 36/OI/H 10
!fE 10S 33/IE/li 551 U H10S I M E dC
//
10 1U H !IL/li M M 10M115 10
//
HS 53' li' lA HS i
33/!L/li IMMI YU 3311133 GIi' 10
//
10 lli 33/20/!! 331017105 96-H 10
//
10 1D M/M/li ti nilO! lliHU 10
//
80 H
. M/I3/li H1m icinii#; 517H iillIdS 10
//
10 113 M /II/16 33 3 lli MT!I M li M i(
M
//
10 lit 01/I)/3(lliHli111011310MIII5I 20
//
10 f01 31/t1/16 53H IATMT1!01 )3M3(
fO
//
10 1U 31/t1/363312lliMT!I]1liML(
10
//
10 1D 31/ti/36 3301AfMT1!E liMI(
10
//
10 1H 31/ti/36 550 llinUIO lli-irf 10
//
10 lli d/ti/16 !iHCGGDI0110 TIUiillE liS 39/II/16 10 T1SC10M/S UA 3Miil M /EC/36 1111111 E ff U i D!01 30031 HS 36/H/16 10 7150IOM/S fU M /!illi U S DII H D UI15 i H i/S XIS 10
//
10 f01 31/t9/965301171311I01)16-tO 80
/-
10 lit 31/Z3/96 SHTHI Hil 31135 3 50UUS HS 36/IS/o fO N
M /Z3/36 si H IAT UT1!01 )I M I(
10
//
10 la a/ZL/16 D 711 ilu H U 11 ISI' II Si 10
//
10 fol 3L/li/96 55 0 111M Y1I01 )I M I(
10
//
10 lli u /I9/36 35 0 1111H1101 )I M t(
10
//
10 11E H/tI/16 IT H S 01151 711371 V/S 10
//
1U EH!!1S 31/01/16 531G IATUTIIH )IMI(
fO
//
50 11E H/OI/86 IH3H!011202 IG D31711 80
//
10 M
C6VI 31/31/96 4E )311171(
fO
//
10 7150 101-i/!' 510' 11M3 n i 31/02/961310IID id i!0 UGH 1 fO
//
10 f01
)
G!iiM) 39/3)lif D IVI!! 093901!!S'301UIIfO
//
!0 T150 lE ilS' 510' 11A3 liS i
- 31/3i/86ffO10I37130150117115 iO
//
10 lli
- 31/36/16llAG11M111331RE1!!01 11$
Gi/ZI/36 11S SIHG 0810 ll' 51711S UE 31/I0/li Di.S HSIIXEI di 1100H' 10
//
10 f01 173'
,lattaas 2y91 eJa upssiuS JJOW Jlla-
~
I itla3c-g 2I/II/!?
l' ill TSIH31115111111H!!S -- 7696 ITH 10H3 3OiilaH H01H1 1UIH(
!ID!iHS SH415 3 E1i D $ 303i' 31/I1/35 SS!I lliMTUD )IS-tS(
10
//
10 118
+02/IS/H HIH:HO HCEM?IS 30U51 HS 06/01/36 10 T1SO lE-f/S f01 l
33/f9/iS XEMS:IIII11HO H 1U' HS 05/19/26 10 T1SOI01-i/$
tE H01 31/I5/li SSU lliHTUD )ii-t9(
fO
//
10 1iH
- 0i/11/15 H 1iiH31 13:i IO D3 1731 50
//
10 M
ti'D Gi/H/!! 110SI01310HU10 30111$
HS
//
HS 30'11'lI'41 M
03/11/16111 SIII 101 HMilISSMlliS fO
//
80 f01 Gi/ZI/li 55 0 11113iH 01 liS-til fO
//
80 lli
- M/?)/36 llaC !ISEIMH ME1SIE fO
//
HS SUU' 0110 H' 51711$ DH M /li/!! llA' I !!!' MIH E D fO
//
HS 310 tA H/?3/3E HS' S211 M-I2M HS ll/QI/iS HS
$10'10ilO'III' lA D /?3/!! i591 lli MTU C )36 ;1(
30
//
10 171 lil;6/if SSIC IATMTH01 )36-D(
10
//
10 1VE niC3llE 1751101 lliEI - HTUI$S 10
//
10 lli
- 39/!!/36 REH1!iil 5111!302 fO
//
fO 171
- 05/U/!! T11:71 CD1!! illi fO
//
HS 310'303 SQ 3!!E/!! 3391 !!i~uH01 lli-)H fO
//
10 113
- 2i/H/li ii2 DiH]!EIID E fO
//
HS 11 Mil 1!!ilS'00111 SIS' 11 EEiD-H
+C/:L/iE 12:iHX UT JC Shill' lE HS i0/OI/li HS H1111/1151TH1111111 lA 15
- tilt /iE 1132 1311 3 151 t W fO
//
11$
H H 1 I/!! 517111 H I!il 11 15/!)/3611 ST11TCE 1001 !!!iHiM!
80
//
fO f01 3!!il/16 I!EC 11I H !!ilaHC 30 U51 11S
!0/II/36 80 flI S:s' 35/IS/!! SSU IATEi;IL lis-D(
10
//
10 lli 3illi/li 10 LID 1 SOIIT1U lli' 13-23-I 10
//
10 lil Gi/Tilli HHHM 103 ililifllit 11S II/it/36 10 113
)ilC /36 SSIC 117137 H 0 )36-D (
10
//
10 113 3!/!i/36 ninIit 3053511110003191 HS II/10/16 HS 101-1H111111I130 fil I0/at/3E SSIG 1lfniH01 )16-))(
80
//
10 17E
+i0/01/36 731M 1111110 10
//
11$
IISI-11111XTS111103173lA i0/13/16 SSU utlunu lit-ti(
H
//
113
- t0/05/16139-SSIH trO US
//
HS 510 I0/09/t6 11Ali0X' illi US 01 B 111 i E1 H S IZ/ZL/26 115 510'403 11 I0/09/26101131 TU 5aI3TdE MI' il-II 10
//
11$
!0/09/36 331Dil10JI3 A01S102
//
f01 l
i0/II/16S
//
H I0/II/IG n'S HSH1S 30' 111013' IDIE id iali' !151710 50HU IC
//
G3 l
I0/T1/1$SSI11713i!!01)16-)9(
10
//
10 1iH I0/I9/16 MI lim 010SI]11 M111111101 fO
//
10 MI I0/11/36111111I1711 Hii! llA 3111115111S II/30/16 10 D3 I0/IS/16511]IT11EI3$
fO
//
IC f01 acilii01-TC11XI
- I3/tilliiOA 3711115 50
//
11S llA 110E13 31
'i0/15/3E MIISII3 LID 1511011CU1(I15510
//
liS S10 203 11
- I0/!0!!!73dA311111S 80
//
115 31Al10S!il lA i0/!S/16 iiiiiiii 13111t 10:315 HC
//
10 lli 135I1153
.laggaas 2yug naa misstu6 Jaom ;5La-
)
I j
PueIc.
4
\\
01/11/50
, [(
11.1AGIIt!!IfStiftLtif!!S--!!!9 i
Iltt itPIC C0!!!ITS IllDLIII LIElf!D IICilflIGSTATIS C0lfACT i COEE.
i 10/25/83 IISUltS OT & FitLICli!!1151f 10
//
50 J0L 10/26/19 ilII0 7ILIC0llIIIECI f111 -
30
//
30 BGE i
LCLE 10/27/tBSS&DIitLUlfl0B 10
//
10 LAB 10/30/B3I!C-CIItillID 10
//
50 JOL PLCt!GES-ISLICt!!!
- 11/02/83CL111FfilGIIIDICIIINT 10
//
IIS SLO ti ACflilfl!
- 11/t9/ES Eit IIGUlitCII AGIFIA 10
//
TIS SLO,105-1/5 & 15 EL 11/D:/15 Ill Flill 1511 - CLIAR 111 ACf !!S
//
f!S 101-1/5 CEE 11/13/63 SSit tilLUlflCE 16Ht) 50
//
50 LAS 11/13i!S!!!.' IDS 0riCIitis.-WILL 10
//
50 DIE LM3153 11/13!!SI1CE153EDiIIIDIEli103OR ED
//
B0 J0L
[Ei02 11/14/Ei SilD ITA'.Jii108 (IH5) 50
//
E0 LLE 11/20/13 II:iDSID LEIFI!!Et !0 UTLE fl5 12/15/19 fl5 FON15 IIS AGET 11/21/E3!!iDEilitli!05(E9-56) 50
//
E0 LLE 11/21/t! if 50ilCI 15K1 CliTIFICAT103 YIS C2/07/90 50 J0L 11/21/13 LECCE!IIS10EIEG 0F Elilillt YES 12/15/f9 E0 II!
!!TE 11/21/f 3 IIIsli! CF GIIttII TEIK CLASS
//
50 III C
11/21/E5fi!SIF!1TICE19!915EEtilFG 50
//
E0 J0L 11/2U13 CEiilflCIT103 CF IFLISTilat
//
50 J0L fLD.
11/27/!ifilDIflLtit10EiES-51) 50
//
50 LII
- 11/2E/E9156LITLLU11105(59-52) 10
//
E0 LLE 11/27/i!!CC0E!!5iSDE27051C1L 50
//
TIS 105-15,C0!IACT CI!
ititiTS 11/26/E9ACEW!!ETIEG E0
//
TIS ELWFf0GELE If i
12/GUtB SSl! 111!E11105 (19-53) 50
//
50 Lif 12/C7/19IIVISIDEDII!!SCIIDULIS-Il115 01/30/90 ftS 50f-1/S&1/5 LIB 12/11/EbIttiFAIIBSti!!!151LTSIS. 50
//
50
!>IE
~
i 12/12/19IICPD!IDAEIFD.70Filf35 fis 12/20/t9 50 til 12/13/if !!SIGE!!If 0F D. SOLLtlillGif 50
//
YES 50E1/S&1/5 TE 12/14/19SS&DIi1LDAfl0E(89-54) 50
//
B0 LLB 12/15/19SSIDfiLLUlfl0E(89-55)
//
10 Lil 12/14/!!IICOit!1710f1LITIITS ID
//
50 LAB filtf!IG 12/19/13 FIDP. POL.Stift.FiflISS IIS
//
50 J0L f/IETI 12/20/E9 SSLIIY11 tit 105 (89-!!)
50
//
50 LAB
- 12/22/ISIlliLIDLEStil!alDIISICE B0
//
!!S SLOCILY li
(
CIII.
- 12/22/191115ftilFCI 07 EDCLI11 PDWII E0
//
!!S SLO 0fLT 17 FL.
- 12/2!/t! ACFW E11LIIG 50
//
f!S ELEFIDGILE IV 12/26/15 STILIIGT F/IEC0E!. LICII!!!
ND
//
50 DIE l
SITI
- Letters that are missing from file.
i 1
i Letters that were missing from index but were in-the file.
i J
Page No. 5 04/09/92 ALL AGREEMENT STATE INDEX DATE TOPIC 02/27/89 Alabama Order of Industrial Radiographer Licensee 03/30/89 Summary of Licenses Held by Professional Services Inc.
03/30/89 Model IR-50 Update j
04/04/89 Medical QA Pilot Program 04/07/89 Irradiator Events 04/14/89 Comments on Draft General License Study 04/17/89 SSD Catalogue (89-15) 04/18/89 SSD Catalogue (89-16) 05/09/89 Distribution of NUREG-1251 05/10/89 Storage of Spent Fuel 05/18/89 Correction of Final Rule 06/05/89 SSD Catalogue (89-19) l 06/06/89 EPA National Emission Standards - Proposed Rule l
06/C6/89 Nordion (Previously AECL) Service Bulletin 06/08/89 NRC General Licensed Gauges 06/09/89 SSD Catalogue'(89-20) 06/13/89 Low-Level Waste Volumes and Activities v
06/14/89 SSD Catalogue (89-22) 1 09/15/89 All AS Meeting l
l 1
l
Page No.
3 10/15/90 ALL AGREEMEN7 STATE I gel-1990
[(
14TE SUBJECT CDMMENTS SUSPENSE LIMITED STATES CDNTACT 01/16/90 SSD Catalogue NO NO LAB
- 01/02/90 BRIEFINS BY DDE: CIVILIAN HLN PRDERAMISP-90-1) ND
/ / YES EN PRD6 EAR DNLY RV 01/03/90 PUBLIC MEETING - LICENSE F;ES (SP 90-2)
ND
/ / ND LAB i
01/05/90 US DDT PRDFDSED RULE (SP-90-3)
ND
/ / YES NON-ABREEMENT ALSD MM 01/08/90 SSIDEVALUAT10N(SP-9F4)
ND
/ / WD LAB 01/09/90 MISADMIN!$TRATION REPDRT RULE (SP-90-5)
ND
/ / ND LAB 01/10/90 RECENTIE!DENTSLARSEIRRADIATORS(SP-90-6) ND
/ / ND MM 01/10/90 PHYSICIAN TRAININS CERTIFICATES (SP-9F7)
O
/ / M LAB 01/17/90 CISTRIBUTION OF NURE6-1383 (SP-90-8)
M
/ / YES NON-A/S ALSD CM 01/17/90 NRC STAFF INITIATIVE SEN. LIC. PRD6 (SP-9F9) ND
/ / ND MM 01/22/90 S!!D EVEUATION (SP-90-10)
ND
/ / ND LAB 01/23/90 NRC FDL.AC SUID. DIRECTIVE 90-1 (SP-90-11)
C
/ / O MM 01/23/90 MEDICAL COURSE AN G U CEMENT (SP-90-12)
YES 02/16/90 ES NDN-A/E ALSD LAB 01/24/10 UF N TE TO FC B4-11 (SF-90-13)
O
/ / O LAB f
01/23/90 WRES-1358 ENV. MNITOR. LLRN ($b9F14)
ND
/ / YES MN-A/S & LLVC ALSD CHM 01/13/90 EITEN. OF LIC. EJEMP. 3M NL SDUF. (SF-90-15) ND
/ / C Du 01/29/90 SSID EVRUATION (SP-9F16)
M
/ / ND LAB 01/31/60 DRAFT kCT. OF EEN. EIEMPTIDN-MED. (SP-90-17) ND
/ / O LAB
- 01/31/90 BRIEFlh5 Ch 60V CERT. LLN $1TES (SP-90-16) W
/ / YES NON-A/S, SLO. LL E ALSD SD
- 02/05/10 'LN liURIAL VOLUPES I ACTIVITIES (SF-90-19) YES 02/28/90 YES St. WV, WA DNLY CHM
- 02/06/ % SSED Evt DATION (Sh 90-22)
ND
/ / M LRB
- 02/It/50 PECIFF0:lii-C TICE TO RE610NAL ADM.(SF-90-23) ND
/ / C MJF
- 02/02/90 FC-24-11 UFDATE (SF-9F24)
E
/ / ND LAB
- 02/09/90 A > N MAILING (SF-9 625)
ND
/ / YES HLW FRD6EAM ONLY RV
- 02/02/90 1929 ALL A/S MIETINS LETTER (SP-90-26)
ND
/ / ND LAB
/ / YES ON-A/S & LLNC CHM l
- 02/22/90 MEDICAL GA RULE (SP-90-25)
ES 04/12/90 ND LAB
- 02/12/90 SSID EVALUATICh ($F-9F29)
ND
/ / ND LAB
- 02/14/90 SSID EVALUATION (SP-90-30)
,ND
/,/ ND LAB
- 02/16/90 AckN 16 $U m F Y REFORT (SP-90-31)
M
/ / YES E N PRD6 RAM ONLY RV
- 02/23/90 ITAFT CCDE PRACTICE IMPORT /EIFDRT (SF-9 F 33) YES 03/09/90 YES NDN-A/S, SLO & LL C ALSD ML
- C2/21/90SSIDEVALUAT!ON(SP-90-34)
C
/ / M LAB
- 03/06/90 AhCAL LIC. FEES FY 90 PONER REA.(SP-90-37) ND
/ / ES SLO 4 SUC ONLY SD C3/12/90 THERATRDNICS TIMER BULLETIN (SP-90-36)
C
// NO LAB 03/05/90 S$4D EVALUATION (SP-90-39)
ND
// NO LAB 03/15/90 OPERATID4AL EVENTS BRIEFINS (SP-90-40)
ND
/ / NO LAB
- 03/02/90 SEh/siE VDTE CLEAN AIR BILL S.1630 (SP-90-41) M
/ / NO CK l
03/19/90 TEMPDRARY INSTRUCTION WELL LD661NS (SP-90-42) ND
/ / ND LAB 03/13/90 SSID EVALUAT!DN (SP-90-43)
ND
/ / KD LAB
ND
// YES SLO E
- 03/13/90 2 0 WRC REE. INTO CONT. (SP-9F45)
M
- 03/13/90 PET. FOR RULERK6. Lit. IEEP. PON. (SP-9F46) YES 05/11/90 YES SLO & Pilt SD 03/20/V0 SUIDELINES REV!$1DN (SP-90-47)
// ND LAB j
03/15/90 SSED EVALUAT!DN (SP-90-48)
C
// ND LAB
\\
03/21/90 MEDICAL GA - PILOT PRD6 RAM (SP-90-49)
C
/ / E LAB 03/16/90 SS&D EVALUAT10N (SP-90-50)
W
// W LAB 03/21/90 REFORT DF CV. *B9 SPEC. TOPICS (SP-90-51) H I / ND JOL l
- Letters that are missing from file.
l
i
(
Page No.
2 10/15/90 EL AGREEMENT STATE I GEI-1990 f
{k LATE SUB.7ECT CONMENTS SUSPERSE LIMITED STATES CONTACT 03/21/90,1NSPECT!DNPRDCEDURESCDURSE(SP-tF52)
ES 05/25/90 YES NON-A/S ESD JOL 03/21/90 DECOMISSIDNIN6 RULE (SP-tF53)
NO
// NO LAB
- 03/22/90 MIIED NASTE (SP-90-54)
NO
// NO LAB l
03/22/901990 INTRODUCTION TO LICENSIN6 (SP-90-55)
YES 04/30/90 YES NON-A/S ALSD CHR 03/21/90 $5tD EVALUATION (SP-9046)
NO
// NO LAB 03/22/90 NRC LLNC MEETIN6 N/JSC (SP-to-57)
NO
// ND CHM 03/22/90 NRC LLNG REET!h6 N/PAtlFIC NL (SP-90-58)
//
03/23/90 2 0 UPb4TE DN SS:NELL LD661NG (SP-tF59)
NO i / NO LAB 03/23/90 IMPORT / EXPORT:EITEC. COMENT PER. (SP-9F60) YES 04/24/90 YES NON-A/S ESD, LLNC, SLO SD 03/27/90 !$1D EVALUATION (SP-9 F61)
ND
// ND LAB i
03/30/90 CALIBRATION DF COUNT RATE RETER (SP-90-62)
NO
// NO LAB 03/30/90 PHYSCIAN INTERPRE./FGlD C C. STUDY (SP-90-63) ND
// ND LAB 03/30/90 ILLINCIS AMEGED AGREEMENT (SP-90-64)
ND
// YES NON A/S ALSD DS i
03/30/90 TFESATRDNICS TIMER BULLETIN (SP-90-65)
NO
// YES ON A/S ONLY SD 04/02/90 SSID EVALUAT10N (SP-90-66)
G
// ND LAB
- 04/03/90 STABILIZATIDNIDECONTAM. PRIDIRTY (SP-90-67) W
- 04/05/90 TRANSMITIAL OF H AFT O RE6-1395 (SP-90-69)
ND
// ES NON-A/S, PUC, SLO ESO RV 04/09/90 SSLD EVALUATION (SP-90-69)
ND
// NO LAB 04/1B/90 LLk VDLUMES & ACTIVITIES (SP-9F70)
W
// YES NV,SC,NA CHM 08/12/s0 INTEFFRETAT!0N OF 10 CFR 61 (SP-90-71)
YES 05/16/90 NO ENS 04/13/$0 FET. FOR RULEMt!NS-SIERRA CLUB (SP-9F72)
YES 06/26/90 YES NOA-A/S, SLD, LLNC ALSD SD i
04/13/90 SSID EVALUATION (SF-9F73)
W
// NO LAB Y4/17/90 (R NCT.FUE.NDEGHOP MAINTEN.STD.(SP-90-74)
ND
// YEs SLD, SISN. HAZARDS ONLY RV
[
04/23/90 C T. OF ESCALATED ENTOR. ACT10N ISP-9 F75)
NO
// NO LAB 04/23/90 RESCHEDUllh5 ! CUST/RC. CDURSE (SP-90-76)
ND
// YES NDN-A/S ALSD CHM 04/26/90 EASCAL CDDE BAtr6R00@lMETH. (SP-9F 77)
E
// YES G -A/S ALSD RL 04/23/90 SUMAO DF 3/27/90 MTB.N/J6C CORF. (SF-9F78) ND
// M CHM
// N0 KNS 05/03/90 STGRAEE OF LLEN (SP-90-80)
ND
// WO CHM 04/24/90 SSID EVALUAT10h (SF-9 FBI)
C
/,/ NO LAB
- 04/25/90 AFFT. OF FCOMFS SES POSITION (SP-9F B2)
NO
// YES O -A/S ALSD 4 SLO RL 05/04/90 STATE PRDSRAMS INCEI (SP-90-B3)
O
// YES ON-A/S ALSD & SLD BH 04/27/90 U.S. kRC SEMIANNUAL REE. ASEGA (SP-90-64)
ND
// YES SLO ONLY RV
- 05/01/90 ACNN MILINS ISP-90-85)
ND
// YES HLN DNLY RV 05/01/90 LISTS OF METAL SCRAPDEALERS (SP-90-86)
NO
// YES NDN-A/S ALSD JDL 05/22/90 SUMARY OF HBCDCI & WILCOI RTB. (SP-N-87) ND
// NO CHR 05/k7/90 AMEOMENT TD UT A6REEMENT (SP-90-IB)
ND
// YES NON-A/S ALSO DS 05/03/90 SS U EVALUATIDN (SP-90-89)
NO
// NO LAB 05/04/90 LLN CISPDSAL RESULATORY ORKSCP (SP-9F90) C
// YES IRILTIPLE STATES CHR 05/1B/90 LLN DISPDSAL LICENSE BARNNELL, SC (SP-to-91) M
// YES NON-A/S ALSO DS j
- 05/15/90 ACNN MILINS (SP-90-92)
NO
// YES ILN DNLY RV MS/22/90 SPECIAL TDPICS VDRESHOP (SP-90-93)
YES 06/01/90 ND HF l
05/23/10 FINAL RULE (SP-90-94)
NO
// NO LAB
- 05/23/90 LLO PE6. NDRES@P-PLASAR EIERCISE (SP-90-95) NO // YES ltiLTIPLE STATES CHR 05/30/90 REDICAL RISADMINISTRATION REP (di (SP-90-96) ND
// 50 LAB 06/01/90 SCHEDULE FDR Ml!ED NASTE NORKSHOP (SP-?Ff7) ND
// YES NON-k/S 4 LLNC ALSD CHM
- 06/04/90 CHAIPMAN CAPR'S REMARES ON BPC (SP-90-?B) 50
// YES NON-A/S, SLO & LLN ALSO FC 06/05/90 RED. ULES OF RADIDNUCLIDE CDURSE (SP-90-99) YES
// YES NON-A/S ESO LAB 06/0B/90 ACMUI MEETING SCHEDULE (SP-90-100)
YES 06/19/90 ND LAB 06/0B/90 AMEU PET. FOR RULEMilNS-S!ERRA (SP-tF101) ND
// YES IGN-A/S SLD, LLNC E SD SD 06/06/90$$4DEVALUATIDN(SP-?>102)
ND
// NO LAB 04/10/90 Corrected copy of (sp-9-52)
- Letters that are missing from file.
l b
l Page No.
3 10/15/90 ALL AGREERENT STATE I gel-1990 DATE
.tUBJECT CORRENTS SUSPENSE LIMITED STATES CONTACT 06/13/90 VISITNS FELONS PROSRAM (SP-90-103)
YES 08/31/90 #0 LAB 06/15/90 AMERICAN ACAD. OF E ALTH PHYSICS (57 *0-104) ND
// ND 06/14/90 REDUEST FOR AS$! STANCE (SP-9 F105)
ES 07/30/90 ND JOL 06/15/90 SSEDEVALUATION(SP-90-106)
NO
// NO LAB l
06/27/90 S$tDEVALUATION(SP-90-107)
NO
// NO LAB
)
- 06/27/90 POLICY STATERENT ON BRC (BP-9 F 108)
ND
// YES SLO, LLN, SN, PUC ION-AS RV
- 07/18/90 DIST. OF NRC DOCUMENTS P.L99-240 (50-90-109) ND
// ES SLD, LLW & NON-A/S ALSD SS
- 06/28/90 RARK 1 CONTAINRENTS (SP-9F110)
ND
// ES SLO ONLY ED 06/28/10 DRAFTTECHNICALP051 TION-NASTE(SP-90-111)
YES 07/30/90 YES LIMITED STATES ONLY CR
+06/28/90 THE RASCAL CODE - UPDATE (SP-90-112)
NO
// YES NON-A/S & ERER6. PREPARD E
- 07/06/90 NATIONAL STATE LIAISON RTE. - (SP-90-113)
NO
// YES SLO ONLY ML 07/06/90 0FERATIONAL EVENTS BRIEFINS (SP-9F114)
ND
// NO LAB 07/03/90199016USTRIAL RADIOSKAPHY (SP-90-115)
YES 07/27/90 ES CN-A/S ALSD CR
- 07/03/90 LIST OF ADVANCE ETIF. DESIGNESS (SP-90-116) k0
// YES SLO & 60VER CR E S. DNLY RL 07/10/90 1990 A/S REITIN3 (SP-90-117)
ES 08/31/90 WD LAB 07/13/90 1990 SFECIAL TDPICS NDRISHO' (SP-90-116)
ND
// NO SD OS/0c/90 FFDTECTIVE REAS'$E TECN. OFFSHDP (SF-90-119) ND
// YES NON A/S & EMER. PREP.
RL
- 07/1B/90 CC. POWER PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL (SP-9F120) ND
// YES SLO, ST. OFF. LLC SD/RV 07/26/90 1990 SPEC. TOPICS ORr$ HOP AGENDA (SP-9F121) ND
// ND JR
$07/19/90 ST0FABE OF SFENT FUEL (SF-90-122)
ND
/ / ES SLD, HLN SUC SD 07i19/90 5560 EVALUAT10N (SF-90-123)
ND
/ / NO LAB 07/26/90 SE't!-ANN. REPORT LLNRIDECOR. PROS, (SF-90-174) C
// YES NON-A/S,LLNC 07/23/90 SEID EVA'UAT!DN (SF-90-125)
ND
/ / NO LAB 07/25/90 TFANSFDRTATION COURSE (SP-90-126)
YES 08/13/90 C Kk5 07/25'90 BRC PCLICY, PUBLIC REETINS ISP-90-127)
NO
// ES SLO, LLN, CN-A/S.SH,PUC RV
- 07/25/90 LICENSE RENEWEL F/ POWER PLANTS (SP-90-128)
ES 10/22/90 YES SLD,NSH,PUC.LLNC.OR RV 07/30/'0 SSID SYSTER REPORT (SP-9F129)
ND
// NO LAB 07/13/90 TRAININS COURSE AN CUC EMENT (SP-90-130)
YES 09/04/90 YES NON-A/S RD
- 07/25/90 C T. OF RECE1Pi 0F DOE PET. (SF-9F1311 YES 10/11/90 YES HLN RV 07/31/90 6L STUDY EATA (SP-90-132)
YES 08/24/90NO LAB 07/30/90 PEFF0FR3 CE ASSES $ RENT COURSE (SP-9 F133)
YES 08/13/90 YES NON-A/S ALSD INS 07/31/90 IMPLEMENTATION OF NESHAPS RULE (SP-9F134)
C
// YES NON-A/S & SLO ALSD CHR
- 07/31/90 R c !DatilVITYlSCFAPRETAL SERINAR (SP-90-135) ND
// YES NON A/S ALSD JOL
NO
// YES SLO,NSMC RV
- 08/03/90 STAEARD MSIEN CERTIFICAT10N (SF-90-137) YES 08/31/90 ES SLO,SUC,NSHC RV 0B/07/90 SStD EVALUATION (SP-90-138)
ND
// NO LAB 06/10/90 LLW & URAN!UR RECOVERY 318L106R (SP-90-139) ND // ES NON-A/S, LLC, SLO ENS 08/31/90 ASNT CERTIFICATION PROGRAM (SP-90-140)
ND
// NO LAB 08/06/90 POLICY & SUIDACE DIRECTIVE (SP-90-141)
ND
// NO LAB 08/16/90 AVAILA!!LITY OF K 6. SUIDE 366 (SP-9F142)
ND
// NO JR
$$8/16/90 PUBLIC CR[ SHOP DN (IPEEE) (SP-90-143)
NO
// ES SLD,NSHC RV 08/21/90 SSID EVALUATION (SP-90-144)
NO
// NO LAB
$08/22/90 SLO PUB.WORtSHOP DN PONER PLANT (SP-9F145) ND // YES SLO ONLY RV
// YES SLO, NSNC, SUC ONLY RV 08/29/90 POL & SUID B.tR FC-B4-11, REV.1 (SP-90-147) ND
// NO LAB 06/27/90 RED-INTERIM FINAL RULE N/CORRENT (SP-90-148) YES 08/23/93 NO LAB 08/27/90 SSIDEVALUATION(SP-9F149)
C
// NO LAB 08/29/90 MTERNATIONAL NUCLEt,R EVENT SCALE (SP-9F150) C
// YES fLD, NSHC, SERA DNLY RV 09/04/90 TRAVEL ARRANSERENT - A/S (SP-9F151)
ND
// C LAB
$08/31/90 ASNT DRAFT ASREEMENT (SP-9F1521 ES 09/21/90 0 LAB 09/17/90 INTERIM POSITION DN DIS.IN-SITU (SP-9F153) ES 11/05/90 C DS
- Letters that are missing from file.
Pape No.
4 10/15/90 ALL AGREEMENT STATE ! OEI-1990
(
DATE SLHECT COMENTS SUSPENSE LIRITD STATES CDNTACT 09/05/#0SSIDEVALUATIDN(SP-90-154)
ND
// ND LAB 09/07/90 MED INTER RULE N/ RED. FDR COMMENT (SP-90-155) YES M /23/93 YES NON-A/S ONLY LAB
- 09/07/90 PROFDSA! RULE - FITNESS FOR DUTY (SP-90-156) YES 10/30/90 YES SLD,NSH RV 09/14/90 MTE FDR ADDPTIDN DF DECD m. RULE (SP-90-157) ND
// ND JDL 09/12/90 $14D EVALUATIDN (SP-90158)
ND
// #D LAB
- 09/14/90 TRAININSCDURSEANNDUNCEMENT(SP-90-159)
YES 09/27/90 YES NON-A/S ALSD DS 09/19/90 HLMAN FACTORS RESEARCH 10. RAD (SP-90-160) ND
// ND JM t
- 09/17/90 NATIDhAL CANCERN INSTITUTE SURVEY (SF-90-161) ND
// YES SLD DNLY SC l
09/19/90 ALL A/S KTS ASE CA 6 TRAVEL (SP-90-162)
WD
// ND LAB l
09/19/90 DPEFATIDNAL EVENTS BRIEFINS (SP-90-163)
ND
// ND LAS l
- 09/24/90 REVIEN & FINAL REVISIDN OF NASTE (SP-90-164) ND
// YES SLD, PUC, MLN DNLY RV 09/21/90 FATAL AOCIDENT IRRADIATIDN, ISRAEL (SP-90-166 ND
// ND JR i
- 09/25/90 IETH WATER REACTDR SAFTY INFD RTS ($F-90-167) ND
// YES SLD, NLV DNLY RV 09/24I90 PDLICY & SUINNCE DIRECTIVE (SP-90-169)
ND
// ND LAB 09/25/9C FIN. STAFF FCS. DN ERCSIDN FRDT. (SP-90-169) WD
// YES CD, IL,TI, WA DNLY DS (8/25/90 !!iD EVALUATIDW (SP-90-170)
ND
// ND LAP 10/03/90 Human Factors Res Project Medical Use Nuclear Materials (SP-90-165) e i
i l
- Letters that are missing from file.
i
e.
3CI: &Jat-91 I
pg, 3 AEtBErf !!!!! IDE ISH C ttS 88888888 ttttt t tt t tt t t tttt t t t t888888888t$35t3855888888 t8888 t888888 tt $t8888888888E888883588888 MCUEU Taft IWitt SUlJECT COEttf5 EDSPDSI LIED mftS C0ffic!
C 8888888888tt tS 88;t,8888888 tt t t tt t t t tttt t t tttt tt t tttt t t t t t tt t tt t t ttS S$$$ tt ttt t tt S SCtstttttttttttttttttSSS Stt ttttttt tSCC 8 t St t t t t tis ti '
- C3-Det90 E-4 172 ACW EAILIIG Yts EI WLY N
E3-D:t-H SP-90-174 ARH3CE, GAI3 II YtllllH Cni!!
YES B08-1/5ALSO DS 23-Jan-90 SP-90-175 AVAIL. OF IDACTS Itc 2.0 COM M
DS 05-Oct-90 KP-90-178 21HI II Am COM RC OF Ctml its 305-1/S, Elo ALSO J0L i
12-Det-90 SP-90-177 blSPOSE OF XITE E!Lm 50 JCL i
- W0ct-90 EP 90-178 ALL A/S ErflH 1990 80 MB l
12-D:t-90 57-90-179 mpS105 0F mi 05 ItSEAPS YES 305-1/S,114 ESO ME I
l
- 10-Oct-90 SF-90-182 PRCFOSD KLt MH. !!SPOISI MTA TIS 12/2(/90 R$ $14, IERG. PIDitDRSS E
(
17-D:t-93 SP 90-153 IAt10ACf1TI SCRAP N0Erf TIS 5051/5 ESO J0L 17-Oct-90 SP-90-16( S! Aft PROGm3 IIm TIS 5051/5, $10 ES0 B
l It-Det-90 SF-90-185 MIGII3 PWS FOR ML CICLE YES 11/30/90 ftS B011/5 ESO E
$0f-In 90 3P 90-186 NEC'S ACR MillH TIS W CILY M
+31-Oct-90 SF 90-1BB IIf!!IE PDC. T/AFFELAf! mm TIS 12/10/M TES 514 & 2SE N
$07-In-90 5?-S0-129 Ativ E11L1H TIS Er0ILY H
OC-in-90 37-90-190 IUUb13B3 fts 9081/S, $14, WC, ESO US 06-In-90 SP M-191 SSD IVALL'Afl0E 50 MB 20 In M iP 90-1921H15105 GUDAI3 Of f!CEllCAL 155157153 YES 105-1/S, ILO, WC IIS 19 In H IP-90-193 POLICf & GUIMICI t!!!Cfm 90-6 to JM C7-In 90 EP-90-194 milli: 00015! Ap0UI3ENT TES 9051/5 ESO DS 05 In 90 IP-90-195 AEHXNT 70 m ILLlHIS Att!!E!If US 5051/$ ALSO DS 06-In 90 $P-bl96 EDICAL GA EnlH B0 LH
- 14 In-95 SP-b1S7 ACIV EllLII3 its W PROG M OILY H
IS-In-H 57 9>198 AIMUI. OF mm!TI full!IG S3DUlt YES 5011/5 ES0 DS
21In-H $7 90-200 CORFORE. IRC SUIMI3 LLD liCILITI TIS 5011/S, ELO, MC ESO ES 10-iee-90 SP-6201 Alf;E SUEAll!S OF 18C1W75 ftS 02/15/91 to JOL
- 26-In-90 SP H-202 StAtt LIAISOE OFFICttS IttflIG 1990 RS ELOCELY E
27-In-90 SP-M-203 &S D m LMf!05 90 MB 24 In-90 SP-M-204 EmiAft COI3rmflM V0tISB0P TES CD, 51, IL, ft J0L
- 29-In-90 SP-M-205 filLlH IDH ftB CW ERIEHL LICDSI Yts CD, IL, R. T!.V!.U,B,li MB 06-ke90 E 9b206 It9. F/COI. fifLt Yt&BSFtt & POSS!!SIM ft!
01/31/91 fts 805-1/8, Ela, WC SS 10-ke-M EP-90-2071851GIERf 0F J1ES ERS 70 9 fts 905-1/5 E80 15 H-he-H D-5208 EfflH OI EDICE GA Yts its B051/8 ESO MI 20-he-90 49b209 IEPIBttfifl0E OF Mft FOR 10 CFR PAff 20 ft$ B05-1/S, 814 EIO DS 21 he-90 9-90-210 MI IDDID PRCIf! m 500 TIM F01 BC Whe-90 $5P-5211 ABID. 70 le CPI PAI! N APP 90fD E ODE N NOD gYES 905-1/S, Ela, WC ALSOJ0L fts 301-1/S, EIA, WC ALSD 30L 27-he-M D-90-212 IISPICTICI Pl!R! fits TtS 01/20/91 30
- L 21-he-M D-M-213 FROPOSD m EU2 PART 36 ftS 91/31/91 to W
- 22-Jat-31 SP-9b214 DIFillfl010F tit ftB EN Yt$ Elf ELY N
SP-90 215 fMID IIDm3rfLY E! RSD f*
h e-90 9-90-216 550 ITEml01 90 W
. ke 90 SP-90-217 m. BG GUIM IIIN BDMAI POUT PMr!
Yts
$3/08/91 YES Sie. III. PDC ELI N
24-he M R-M-218 $50 m!Olfl0E 30 W
- Letters that are missing from file.
=.
Fage 1 i
i AGREEMENT STATE INDEX 1991 j
.u======
==.
=...
.a : =_=.....= 2..uuu a.
=.
DOCLMENT DATE NUMBER EUBJECT OtpetENTS SUSPENSE LIMITED STATES CONTACT
}
=.
= = = = = = = = = =. = = = _
= = = =...........
)
- D4 Jan 91 SP 91-2 PROGRAM PLAN FOR TNE ACNW YES NLW & LLW ONLY RV 09-Jen-91 SP 91 3 RADIOGRAPHY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM EETING YES NON-A/S, SLO, CENIPACTS VN y
- 09-Jan-91 SP-91 4 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE YES NLW ONLY RV
{
09-Jen-91 SP-91 5 NOV. 5,1990 NTG W/LLnat & US ECOLOGY No CM f
17 Jan-91 SP-91-6 NRC MTG PROPOSED RULE F/LGE IRRADIATORS No JL 11-Jan-91 SP-91-7 atDICAL USE OF RADIONUCLIDES TNG COURSE YES ASAP YES NON*A/S ALSO Lt
{
16-Jan-91 SP 91 8 SP INDEX YES NON-A/S ALSD BH 16-Jan-91 SP-91-9 TEMPORARY WAIVER OF CtMPLIANCE BY NRC YES NON-A/S ALSO DS 18-Jen-91 SP 91 10 MEDICAL QA FOLLOW-UP M ETING NO Lt 24 Jan-91 SP 91 11 $$80 EVALUAfl0N NO LB C1 Feb-91 SP 91 12 IkSTALL, SOURCE EXCN. REMOTE AFTERLQADERS No JL 30-Jan-91 SP 91 13 REV. STAFF TECHNICAL POSIT. WASTE FORM YES NON-A/S, SLO, COMPACTS KS 29 Jan-91 SP-91-14 ItSPECTION PROCEDURES COURSE YES 02/28/91 YES NON A/S ALSO JL
- 14-Feb-91 SP-91 16 REVISION TO PART 20 YES NON-A/S ALSO KS 07 Feb-91 SP 91 17 RED F/EKTEN ON TITLE TRANSFER LLRWPAA YES 03/02/91 YES SLO, NON A/S, COMPACTS 18 Mar-91 SP 91 18 NUREG 1199 YES NON A/S, SLO, COMPACTS KS
}
18 Mar-91 SP 91 19 NUREG-1200 YES NON-A/S, SLO, COMPACTS KS l
05 Feb-91 SP 91 20 $$&D EVALUATION No LB 08 Feb 91 SP*91 21 INTRODUCTION TO LICENSING COURSE YES 03/11/91 YES NON A/S AL50 CM
NO LB i
26-Feb 91 SP 91 24 RECIPROCITY NOTICES to LB 21 Feb-91 SP 91 25 MEDICAL GA MEETING NO LB 01 Mar-91 SP 91 26 DEFINITION OF' SEALED SOURCES t
NO JL 01-Mar 91 SP 91 27 NRC INFORMAT!DN NOTICE No. 91 C3 No LB l
01-Mar-91 SP-91 28 INTERPRETAT!DN OF SCANS No LS
)
01 Mar 91 %P 91-29 REVOCATION OF WRC LICENSE NO LB 26-Feb 91 SP-91 30 $$&D EVALUATION N0 LB
- 06-Mar-91 SP-91 31 THIRD NRC REGULATORT INFORM. CONFERENCE YES REACTOR SLO ONLY RV 07 Mar 91 SP-91 32 POL. & GUID. DIRECTlWE FC-84 11 REV. 1 N0 JL
[
07-Mar 91 SP 9133 INFORM. NOTICES FOR MATERIAL LICENSEES e0 JL t
05 Mar-91 SP 91 34 ADVISORY CENet!TTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE YES NLW-LLW RV i
27-Feb 91 SP 9135 SELOW REGULATORY CONCERN POLICY YES SLO,NON-AS,PUC,LLW,NSM,5HO RV f
07 Mar 91 SP-91-36 REMAINING TRAINING SCNEDULE FOR FY 1991 YES NON A/S ALSD SH
[
09-May 91 SP-9137 FDA APPROVED DRUG LIST NO LB 07 Mer 91 SP-91 38 SS&D EVALUATION NO LB
{
- 11 Sep 91 SP-91 39 REV 1 TO NUREG 1293 YES NON-AS, SLO, LLWC KS t
13-Mar 91 SP-91-40 STATE REvlEW OF PRPSED UNIFORM MANIFEST YES NON-A/S ALSD CM j
- 15 Mer-91 SP 91 41 POLICY & QUIDANCE D!t FC 83 1 REV 2 NO La 15-Mer-91 SP-91 42 TECHNICAL ASS!$TANCE REGUEST NO Lt 26-Mer 91 SP-9143 MARCH 8 STAT ON NESMAPS RULE NO NON AS, SLO, LLWC CM 29 Mar-91 SP 91 44 ENV!kONJIENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY SURVEY NO LB
- 19-Mar-91 SP 9145 ADVISORY Com!TTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE YES NLW/LLW ONLY RV i
28 Mer 91 SP 91 46 REPRINT-RADIATION PROTECTION PRIMER YES NON-AS, SLO JL i
29 Mar 91 SP 91 47 ALL A/S MEETING 1991 NO LB 03 Apr-91 SP 91 48 ADVISORY CSNe(ITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE 29TN YES NLW/LLW RV
- Letters that are missing from file-j L
i
, - - -. ~
Page 2
.f e
6 i
au u
- eeeeeeeeeeeu..u u:.--.
u...
...... ueeeee:u u
-.......--. u u u u :.-
.:.. u u...
.-.. u.eeeee, m DOCLMENT DATE 1P.m8Et R5 JECT EDOENTE E">SPENSE LIMITED STATES CONTACT eeeeee u. u u..ees u.. u u u u u -... : -...--....u.uu-..--.......u..
.u.-
--.......u.eeeeeeeeeee CDS Apr 91 SP 91-49 REVISED FEE SCNEDULE TES 80N-A/S ALSO LB 15 Apr-91 sp-91 51 REVISED FEE SCNEDULE 50 La
[
10-Apr-91 SP 91-52 ss&D EVALUAfl0N a0 Le 12 Apr-91 SP 91-53 FINAL RULE euALITY NANAGENENT PROGRAM 30 Lt 92-Apr 91 SP 91-54 LESSON LEARNED UNIVERSITT OF CINCIWWATI 80 LB 18 Apr 91 sP-91-55 mRC Coeniss!ON MTG, ACNW 3/22/91 YE8 NON-A/S, SLC, LLWC tt 92 Apr 91 SP-9156 REAstERTION OF WRC AUTNORITY IN IDANO Wo JL CANCELLED SP 9157 PROPCsED RULE TIMELINE85 DEttM RAT FAC 50 JL 18 Apr 91 SP 91 58 RECOGNITION OF FRENCH RAD. STAl@ARDS 50 LB 15 Apr-91 SP 91 59 INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPNY CoutSE FOR 1991 TES 05/15/91 TEs acN A/s ALs0 at 23 Apr-91 SP-91 60 PERFORMANCE ASSES $NENT WottsNDP YES 05/30/91 TES MON A/$ ALSO t$
19 Apr 91 SP 9161 TRANSPORTATION CoutSE YE5 05/20/91 TES NON A/S ALSO ts 2o Apr-91 SP-91-62 PUS. NTG. NRC FUTURE ROLENACING 5/14/91 YES 50N-A/S ALSO Es 01-Noy-91 SP-91-63 $$&D EVALUATION ho LB C7 May-91 SP-91-64 NEDICAL ADVISORY Cott1TTEE to LS 10 may-91 3P 91-65 RADIOPNARMACEUTICALS VIDE 01 APE j
to LB o13 Mey-91 SP 91 66 REACTOR SAFETY INFO EKERCISE & EMERG.
TES aCC A/S, SLO, ENERG. PREP ML o05-Aug 91 $P 91 67 DISTRIBUTION OF Wat Doc. P.L. 99 240 TES NON A/S, ELD LLWCD 55
}
C DS-Mey-91 SP-91-68 ACWW mAILIN:
TES NLW, LLW RV 95 Mer 91 $P 91-69 CLAtlFitAT10N REQUIR. TRAN$. RAD. NATER.
80 E5 l
5 mer-91 SP-91 70 AMENDMENT 70 stC's CNEN NUCLEAR $YSTENs no ES 09 Noy 91 SP 91 71 M0J W/MI EMERG. RESPONSE DATA SYSTEN 90 mL l
16*Mey 91 SP 91 72 TECNNICAL AS$1$fANCE REOUE$f (TAR) 30 JM 16 may 91 sp.9173 POLICY & GUIDANCE DitECTIVE FC 9 2 to JM C5-Je91 SP 9174 REylsION OF 10 CFR PART 34 WO Lt i
26-may 91 SP 91 75 SS&D EVAtuATION NO LB
]
C3 J e 91 SP-91 76 Jut!SDICTION-INDIAN LANCS 90 L8 I
C C3 Je91 SP-9177 SRC DISTRIsWTION TRANsNIT SECY 91132 to RV C3 J m-91 SP 91 78 AS PROGRAM INFot4Afl0N MO JM 05 Jun-91 SP-91-79 ss&D EVALUATION po Lt 12-Je91 SP 91-80 DEC0*(15510NINC RECORDCEEPlWG TES 06/28/91 NO LB 12-Jm-91 SP 9181 SCRA REQUIRMENT5 FOR MIKED & MAZAR WAITE TES WON-A/S, SLO, LLWC El 12 J e 91 SP 91 82 85&D EVALUATION NO LB 20-J e 91 SP 91 83 TRAINING CastSE ANN. 8EDI*.AL USE TEs 07/08/91 YEs uGN A/S ALSO LE 020 J m-91 SP 91 84 ACWW MAILING TES BLW, LLW EV 20 Jm 91 SP 91-85 YECN. Asst. REest-10CFR20.105&10CFR35.315 so JM C20 Je91 SP 91-86 BRIEFING BY A/S ON COPATIBILITY IBSUE5 WO JL 25 Je91 SP 91-87 SSAD EVALUA110N Wo LB CANCELLED SP 91 88 PART 35-euALITY manage E NT RULE no LB J e 91 SP 91 89 SPECIAL TOPICE W0ttsNOP CASEWDR[ REautIT TES 07/22/91 YE8 TE.CA,8C,WT,lL.LA Jm 08 Jul 91 SP 91 90 BRC laPLEENTATION scRAtat!UN TES 12/01/92 YES ALL CEDES RV 01 Jul-91 BP 91-91 AmutRJuCEENT OF GAS & OIL ELL LOGGING TES 09/01/91 YES 50N-A/S ALSO RD D5 Jut 91 SP 91 92 REVISION TO PART 20 FINAL RULE TES 30N A/S ALSO ES 0 11 Jul-91 SP-91 93 ACNW NLW NAILING TER BLW IV oletters that are missing from file.
1
sons"'
g Page 3 BATE apeER 2 5 JECT EMBOENTS WePERSE LIIITED STATES gnBf1ACT l
f
M-Oct 91 SP
.-f5 J01NT mRC/ EPA miss WSTE SURVEY YEB LLW RV l
- 19-Jul-91 gP-91-t' acWIT. EFFECTIVENESS IRAC. POER PLANTS YEE SLO, WSM, PUC RV
.9-Jul 91 SP-9197 SPECIAL TOPICS APPLICAT!tus FORN YES FIVE WON A/S ALSO JN 19-Jest 91 SP-91 98 CtpedENTS DRAFT POLICY & RJID. FC 85-4 a0 Ju 25-J et 91 SP-91-99 IEs5At.E FRtst CNAlgunN IVAN SELIN be my
- 23 Jul-91 SP 91 100 FlhAL REVISION 10 CFR PARTS 170 & 171 30 La i
- 26 Jul-91 SP-91-101 PERFORetANE INCENTIVES FleAL POLICY YES SLO, PUC tufLY S0 21 Aug-91 SP-91 109eUPDATE CONTAMINATED STEEL PetDUCTS 30 JL 14-Aug 91 SP-91 110 FINAL SULE ON ERDS YES RO, BERG. PREP., NSM ML
- 14 Aus 91 SP-91 111 Fitti NOU US NUC. msTE IEC & USNRC YE5 HLW ONLY RV 22-Aug-91 SP 91-112 DAFT REV. PROC FOR REVIEWING AS P90GRANS YE5 NO JL
- 28 Aug 9187-91 114 P0ff E8EREGENCY RE80NSE RESOURCE SUIDE 3
YES EON-Art, EstaC PREP. AL50 ML CANCELLED SP 91 115 N$N CONTACT LIST YES 38N RV 28 Aug-91 SP 91 116 POLICY & GUICANCE DIRECTIVE FC N 11 ac Lt 28 Aug 91 SP 91 117 CthetENTS ON DRAFT EVENT REPORT FORM YE5 09/27/91 up JM
f 30-Aug-91 SP 91 119 $140 EVAtuATION to LB 06 Sep 91 SP-91 120 P051710N ON DISP 05AL INSITU NINING YE5 W,CD,TX,1L NE,tet,UT WT DN 06-Sep 91 SP 91 121 POLICY & SUIDANCE D!tECTIVE FC 91 1C3 a0 L8 06 Sep-91 SP-91 122 1991 ALL A/S teEETING NO LB 06-Sep-91 SP 91 123 REOUEST FOR Ct>94ENTS ISRI PROCESSING YES 12/2/91 YES NON-A/S ALSO JL l
12 Sep 91 SP-91 124 REF. NATERIALS flNANCI AL ASSURANCE No JL 12-Sep-91 SP-91 125 SURVEY OF GENERAL LICEksES LB
- 20 Sep 91 SP-91 126 ADW NAILING YE5 NLW/LLW RV 18-Sep-91 SP-91 127 SSAD EVALUATION a0 Le 27-sep-91 SP 91 128 EVALUATIDW OF A/S COMPAfil!LITY NO SNS
(
'3-Sep 91 SP 91 129 PDS$1BLE GENERIC DEFECT NO JN t
.-Sep-91 SP-91 130 $$&D EVALUAflom to LB M Oct-91 SP-91 131 EVALUATION OF AS CtpqPATIBLITY !$5UES YES SLO, MON-AS, LLW ALSO
$5 M-Oct 91 SP-91 132 TRAkSMITTAL OF STATE AGREEMENTS INF0 to DS 09-Oct-91 SP-91-133 As51GNMENT OF R BLANTON TO SP YE3 WON A/S ALSO ES 10-Oct 91 SP-91 134 NEDICAL ADVISORY Ctp0(ITTEE l
to Lt 08-Oct-91 SP 91-135 TRANSMITTAL OF SA PtoGRAN IWict REF 112 YES 10/28/91 to VM 09-Oct 91 SP-91 136 1991 ALL As stEETING WO VM
- 11-Oct-91 SP-91-137 ACNW #35 MEETING YEs mLW ONLY tv 11 Oct 91 SP 91138 MEDICAL TRAINING FOR DOCTot$
N LB f)9 Oct-91 SP-91 139 OCT 27,1991 PUBLIC IEETING CN 23-Oct 91 SP-91140 RACIATION PROTECTION ENGINEttlNG Cout$E Tf.$
EON A/S ALSO D$
17 Oct 91 SP-91 141 1992 TENTAfivt TRAINING SCNEDULE TES 50N A/S ALSO DE 28-Oct 92 SP 91 %2 RE EVALUATION OF POLICY REGARD USE OF El fE8 SERG. PREP, SLC & RON A/S Ni j
08-h e 91 SP-91 143 Atuw MAILING FEs utv/LLW ONLY av 15-me919P-91-14% Prop 0 SED NRC EULEM4KitG ON AIRGAPS
.50 JL 10-Dec-91 SP-91 H5 CMMPAT. DETERM OF DECEp9tl8810NING RULE YES 12/10/91 40 KS SB-sm91 SP-91 %6 RES FOR INFO DEttsBEIS$10NED SITES IN AS YES 12/6/71 50 D$
13 mov-91 SP-91-147 TRAmsRITTAL OF REVISION OF SAP YES 12/27/91 YEE 80N-AS. LLW ALSO CM 13-mer-91 SP % 8 OPERATI0 MAL EVENTE BRIEFING SMEET 30 LB
- 18-me91 SP-91 151 Ss4D EVAtuATION LB 35-Dec-91 SP-91 152 MSLICATION OF PROPOSED MAINE AGREEMENT 30 Es
- Letters that are missing from file.
e
samut Page 4 SATE aster E5 JECT 800ENTS RWEuK Lis1TED STATES CONTACT u :--- -....- -.- :- - -. --- -- ---- - ----
- s=-----
26 sev-91 P 91 173 TRAlales cautet afVitED 10 CFR PAAt 20
- u.a Yts 12/15/91
- 26 how-91 SP 91 154 3840 fvAtuAflow so
- 29 ter 91 SP 91 155 to CFA PART $1 La i
YES 83/14/92 ff5 SLD, PUC, LLW OWLY SD
- C2-Dec-91 SP 91 156 AcuW MILlmG TES RLW, LLW QutY RV 13 Dec 918P 91 147 ftANSCt1PT OF tent [tNQP RAD 10PAARu:15T C2 Dec 71 SP 91 138 SSAD EVALUATION JL LB 09-Dec 9187 91 159 EEutRAL Ll u wSE DATABASE 05 Dec 91 SP 91160 sEDICAL toutst Amucuu2 MENT Lt TES ASAP frs mor A/S ALs0 La
- D5 Dec 91 SP 91 161 AtwW MILING Ytt ELV, LLiv, turLT tv 09 Dec 91 SP 91162 ORDEn itsutD T0 isivipuAL bc 19 Dec 91 SP 91163 P05$15LE ILLEGAL TRAasFEtt LB no L8 CAktELLED SP 91 164 mRC TELEPM0WE EMBER CNANGE he YtB WOW AS, SNO, $LC, LLV, PUC FC
- 17 Dec-91 SP 91 165 timAL tuttatuCLEAR POWER PLANT LICENSE 7E8 SLD, PUC, LLWC, SD 18 Dec 9158 91166 554D EVALUATIDW 18 Dec 91 SP 91167 REV utt LLW LIERSE txTtution PERIOD TIS t/31/91 Tf8 50N*AS LL6CD, ALSO 90 23 Dec 918P 91 168 CAnc!As Aft >t!C ENERCT COWTROL Yts M4 Dec 91 SP-91 169 Flu RED CCat COMPAT A/S W/utC REC. PSOC JL YE5 82/03 #2 YES IKhr-AS, SLO, LLtWCD cuLY De
- 24-Dec 91 $P 91 170 f RN REC. COI COEPAT A/$ REG. PROC Tf8 02/03/92 30 Ot 24-Dec 91 SP-91 171 luroamAf tou COPT of mixtD MSTE BURVET WD DS i
- Letters that are missing from file.
e e
l.
Page 5 l
l l
Agreement State Index 1991 l
l Letters that were left out of index.
l Date Document Number Subject 29-Jul-91 SP-91-102 SS&D Evaluation 29-Jul-91 SP-91-103 SS&D Evaluation 30-Jul-91 SP-91-104 SS&D Evaluation-01-Aug-91 SP-91-105 Request for Inform. Mixed Waste Storage 09-Aug-91 SP-91-106 BRC: Deferral of Action Consensus Process l
08-Aug-91 SP-91-107 Transportation Radio. Material in Aircraft -
t 08-Aug-91 SP-91-108 Special Workshop Following A/S Mtg.
j 14-Aug-91 SP-91-109 Contaminated Steel Products from India l
l r
I i
l 1
t l
I I
I f
f i
f i
f k
i k
i l
l i
l
~
l
i
- 22-Jan-92 SP-92-002 ACNW HLW REPORTS HLW/LLW ROV CANCELLED SP-92-003 FRN REQUEST FOR C0f0 TENTS ON COMPATIBILITY YES 02/03/92 BRC ROV 09-Jan-92 SP-92-004 SS&D ALL A/S LA8 04-Feb-92 SP-92-005 LICENSING COURSE ANNOUNCEMENT YES 03/13/92 ALL A/S, NON-A/S RLB l
04-Feb-92 SP-92-006 RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT LIST ALL A/S LA8 UNUSED No. SP-92-007 23-Jan-92 SP-92-008 TRANSPORTATION COURSE ANNOUNCEMENT YES 01/31/92 ALL A/S KXS 27-Jan-92 SP-92-009 ANNUAL SupOIARIES OF INCIDENTS YES 03/16/92 ALL A/S JOL UPDATE TO A/S LTR SP-90-201 DTD 12/10/90 30-Jan-92 SP-92-010 TECH. ASST. REQUEST ON 10 CFR 35.400(d)
ALL A/S Jm l
29-Jan-92 SP-92-Oll INFO ON SPANISH ACCEL. UNIT ALL A/S JM 22-Jan-92 SP-92-012 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF PET. FOR RULEMAKING YES 03/17/92 SLO, PUC SCD UNUSED NO. SP-92-013 l
05-Feb-92 SP-92-014 SSAD ALL A/S LA8
- 31-Jan-92 SP-92-015 NRC TELEPHONE NUMBER CHANGES AT HQ ALL CODES CCK l
28-Jan-92 SP-92-016 OSP INDEX (JAN. - DEC. 1991)
ALL A/S, MON-A/S, SLO BGH 29-Jan-92 SP-92-017 SOLICITATION FOR RADIOGRAPHY COURSE YES 02/21/92 ALL A/S JM 29-Jan-92 SP-92-018 LIST OF NRC INFORMATION NOTICES ALL A/S J0L CANCELLED SP-92-019 AEC8 LETTER TRANSMITTED NO UNUSED NO. SP-92-020 Jm 04-Feb-92 SP-92-021 DOT REGULATIONS TYPE A PACKAGES ALL A/S LAB 04-Feb-92 SP-92-022 EXTENSION FR NOTICE ON COMPATIBILITY YES 03/19/92 ALL A/S, NON-A/S KNS LLW COMPACTS l
93-Feb-92 SP-92-023 FY-92 FUNDS FOR GRANTS FOR RESEARCH i
05-Feb-92 SP-92-024 SS&D SLO,A/S,NON-A/S NSL ALL A/S LAB 05-Feb-92 SP-92-025 SSAD ALL A/S LAB 10-Feb SP-92-026 WORKSHOP ON FUNDING RAD. CONTROL PROGRAMS YES NO DATE ALL A/S RLs 21-Feb-92 SP-92-027 INSPECTION PROCEDURES COURSE YES 03/27/92 ALL A/S RYH 07-Feb-92 SP-92-028 PROPOSED RULEMAKING FOR LLW STORAGE ALL A/S KNS i
14-Feb-92 SP-92-030 PROPOSED RULEMAKING ON LLW STORAGE YES 03/14/92 ALL A/S Jm 02-Mar-92 SP-92-031 SAFETY LIGHT DENIAL ALL A/S LA8 514-Feb-92 SP-92-032 FRN MOU BETWEEN MICHIGAN AND NRC RE ERDS SLO, A/S, NON-A/S, EP MLS
- Letters that are missing from files.
i
__-_..,,,.,--,,---,-,..-----,----.n.,.-.n,-
,,,w,,,-
-,-,,.v-,,---,
,_,m-
., - -, - ~, - _ - -. - -
-- m
-l coce*********************************************************************..*ENT STATE INDEX 1992 AGREEM *******.....************************************
DOCUMENT DATE NUMBER SUBJECT C0999ENTS SUSPENSE coce*************************************************...*************.*******......***********DISTRI8UTION CONTACT
- .********** e****
UNUSED No. SP-92-033
- 25-Feb-92 SP-92-034 AC W MAILING HLW ROV CANCELLED SP-92-035 LEAKING SOURCES ALL A/S LA8 18-Feb-92 SP-92-036 SSAD ALL A/S LA8 18-Feb-92 SP-92-037 SSAD ALL A/S LAB 21-Feb-92 SP-92-038 A/S PROGRAM DATA YES 04/17/92 ALL A/S JOL 28-Feb-92 SP-92-039 AMERSHAM /GTCC SOURCE RETURN ALL A/S RL8 24-Feb-92 SP-92-040 OSP STAFF CHANGES ALL A/S, NON-A/S, SLO KNS
- 27-Feb-92 SP-92-041 NRC POLICY ON COOPERATION W/ STATES SLO MSL 02-Mar-92 SP-92-042 REV. ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE REPORTING CRITERIA ALL A/S LA8
NSH ROV 02-Mar-92 SP-92-044 APRIL RADIOGRAPHY COURSE ALL A/S JM 05-Mar-92 SP-92-045 FRN - SPECIAL REVIEW OF NRC REGULATIONS YES 04/15/92 ALL A/S, NON-A/S, SLO KNS 02-Mar-92 SP-92-046 5540 ALL A/S LA8 03-Mar-92 SP-92-047 NRC LTR TO FDA RE REG. OF RADI0 PHARMACIES ALL A/S, NON-A/S JHM 05-Mar-92 SP-92-048 INSPECTION MANUAL-LLW DISPOSAL FACILITIES ALL A/S KNS 06-Mar-92 SP-92-049 CLARIFICATION SECTION 274o 0F AEA (MILLS)
CO, IL. TX, WA DMS 09-Mar-92 SP-92-050 SS&D ALL A/S
'A8 II-Mar-92 SP-92-051 RADIATION CERTIFICATION WORKSHOP YES 04/17/92 ALL A/S VLM 19-Mar-92 SP-92-052 STEVE COLLINS ON ACMUI ALL A/S RL8 12-Mar-92 SP-92-053 OSP FAX NUMBER CHANGE ALL A/S, NON-A/S JHN 16-Mar-92 SP-92-054 RADIOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT LIST ALL A/S LA8 CANCELLED SP-92-055 JURISDICTIONAL RESP./10 CFR PART 150 ALL A/S LA8
.04/15/92 ALL_A/S, NON-A/S, SLO, EP MSL 03-Apr-92 SP-92-057 MEDICAL USE OF WESF CESIUM-137 ALL A/S LA8 20-Mar-92 SP-92-058 URANIUM MILL STATES LICENSING ACTIONS YES 06/01/92 CO, IL, TX, WA VLM 24-Mar-92 SP-92-059 FY-92 REVISED TRAINING SCHEDULE ALL A/S, MON-A/S DMS 26-Mar-92 SP-92-060 MAINE AGREEMENT ALL A/S, NON-A/S KNS 24-Mar-92 SP-S2-061 SS&D ALL A/S LA8 CANCELLED SP-92-062 JURISDICTION ALL A/S LAB 25-Mar-92 SP-92-063 DEC09tISSIONING RECORDKEEPING YES 05/15/92 ALL A/S VLM
- 26-Mar-92 SP-92-064 ACM MAILING HLW ROV l-Apr-92 SP-92-065 LLW. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PLAN YES 05/15/92 ALL A/S, NON-A/S, SLO LAB LLW COMPACTS
- Letters that are missing from files.
._......_.---1 8
e 8:
5: W5 35 558>43 SEE %555%855585 5
2 m
em
==
r n
=
=
remezm m
(
- =
! s.;<
=~
o s
s g ; e,..
g a
e Ejgus g
g a
a a
! s!!$3eE. ;g,
$y i
i
$5 $l i
t." =
.e
- ee acet.te et
~:
et ettececec
<<<<<<<<<ces ess gemar g;
<v a
<<o
<ve j < 5'R'M W E d d 5 ' '
- d
- d '
'd5 ddddddddddd3 d33
<<=WW W
=
<<<<<<<<<<<m
<m=
g:
a:
m:
~
~
~~
~
~m
~~
E:
e e
et e
- g te W:
2:
2 m
25 22 5:
E:
2 2
22 2
2R 3R 1
m mg a
a aa a
a aa E
m:
W:
E:
m m
em m
mm em e:
W W
5:
5"::
- WW W
WW WW 1
l lg 2
O 1
am 8
~g
- s=
i
- ce e
em es 35W ba m
mm a-e w
g Rus m
- ve a
a c
.mm go 55 W"~
t E
- sc "a
Mg nit us!8 n
cm=
m
- g=
=
m
- e:sl fa
!s
-e a
!=m=se3ese
-8 a!=m mc m
es a:a
==
82 s
e5 sme--e<Es
- a:s8 mm s m
on s'eeso I
al!"b"$==55gr ! _5 W 3
Be E5 s
1: = g g5
=
-EGE5
- s_
m
=so 84-E e
a-e segW Ma
-8 a
a els_l Bea
=e gel maa* 8nWWu E
e W
s is
- s*
c g
C E
!"=
gut scos cc=
e ge gR,e.m= sgl"lMa R_Emllm=ammg!"r8 E
e C*-
2 WG WW E
v 3
s-
_e a s Ia s-
,m Re
- g-E
=
me.
m mmmwgg
.e.
e
- : E ~8 E.
._~m.
3333
.=~.
BI_~8888I~m.
R S
5 m..
- "5 8
33333 E
E88
! I!hh hh hhhhh hhhh hhhhhhhhhhh h h
- ==
==========
=
=
~
5 32R mR R2222 gERE RR222222222 R
j W:LL
$L LLLLL m
LLL LALLAAAAAAA 1
A b
sj de de t &t& St&& & 222 A
i l
jin gi 6 pia lbij is(ais_gg42EEps6is n k
?
n g
L., t,'
- v%E gym 5255
%E g
=>m mmmag 5 5 5 4 s,g m g
mg>
4,5 5
5se v
v m,
- o EEE EE
.J o
5:
- JJJ JJa s*
==>
m m
-===
$.m m
JJ-
%, JJJ
-33
=
i S!I I
I
~=>
ea a
IBe a g
va-
<vam
=:.aE
_ma
.am
->vs v=m<<<-<sssE....<<vv=xss
.~
s sss sass s ssJ
.=v
<s=<
. J3e JJJ J2JJ Jo a *
- J J J *JJJ3 * * *s W 3 ssa saa suas ds
<w<sasosass w
<sm
<==<
==
v==<<<v=<<s<=wassa x
v m<cm E*
w
~
~
~~
m..
.~
m~
5m.o 2
sk w-.
a~
~
~o
~
~
m s
s ss s os
~
~
E ~o E
m~
m m.o o
o
=.
m.
W:
E.: m m
em m
em w.
w w
w ww w
ww w.
5: I:.-
~~
5 E
8 m
5 w
m a
=
W 8
8 5
8 i-0 E
e E
o 8
w o-
=
m
=
=
=
m v
=
- g sg m
1 a
g a
8 5
e e
s m=
M E
u-wm w-m E
=
E
==
uw
=
=E n
.w
.ww==
m m
-.E w
=
J-m a
su em
-wg-E
==
4
=
00 t
vw-mw m-Jo s_=
m 3s
=
mo
=<
~~
<w Jom m
>=w ww8 Eo~5muo M
2 m
mm a
m=
=
~.=s S
"='-Jms t
50' uw?Seg<
w o
=
g "o -
om
- "2"
=
8 "820 E
m< - - m o - w
" W.~ = w w =w.
5 omwnse~
um m
<sw a
=
me s-v
-u-
<ve o-5"8"3"E" dE S'5""W
. E" E E " "* ~'
mm
~
~
SW m
~
E E
Em 5
.w
===vad
=
m e=es m.
m
.s
-.=
A<wwwaE-E<w
- m.. <m 3
sam =vEg
.o
=
m aw a
-w mav-w mo -
mmJWW d -$. vwEed, W o bi W
=--
m mQ mR5" m-ud$55 o*EEo
~e"
.o wE-wmM f$>e Ew w
ww J
m m
J=
e J-5 Je=
5 m
w
<o 2
.4 wu~~
w s.
-o2
&-25 um
-voof<oE s.s o-w
.u 8 3 E
E
- E wCEwateau 2eEmes u n e a"m en"d.
nw=
r m
.==.N
..R
~~
m
.E.
8
, m E.o. c,
~m,
==
o co 2
2-
$ [" : ~~*
- 7 YT T 7777i77 7
777 e
~.~ ~
~~~.~
~. ~.
.~
~~~~~~~
~
~~~
o
.$id m
4 444 4444 de 4
4444444 L
add
. m m
mmm mmmm m m. m mmmmmmm m
mmm a
I N. N.N
.N.N.N N N N.
N.
NNNN.NNN N.
N N N.
.~
.w
~
w..
o w
E555833 h
555 t
~
ww www m
777 7777 77 7
7777777 7
777
~
=~.
..~
-~
~
.-m.me~
o
~~m
.N ooo oo-w o-NNNo.
m ooo a
+
t uy
- s. m.s at Ea
=a N.e 2s alsEEE4HasEmaes us sa a
ma s
-m C-n 8:
m=
w
- a::
.x a,
,e,e
,e,t
)
- s:
.a gg gg e:
2.B
=:....w.g
- a e se.
.E l
- 3. a:aa:e.n
- :::: : start==gg g:
2 2: 22
.d.4 a m:
- wwwsmsa w
4Mwwwwa=www.saasmaaodaswwwwwwwxxww
- as a saaa sa l
8:
w:
=
x==
=
=
m:
m:
e cc g
- =
2 2:
a:
e
~
c m:
a:
s
:
a a
s s.
,s: s:
e e==
=
=
=
=
g:
s.:
m.:
s c
o
- s.
s es
=
.: es s-
=
=
s-g
- Is e
as e
x ce e
es es s
- n8 a
sa e
e
-8 a
m ge=sRg-m e
-ss 8
I
- se m
sm
- ag e
ce gas s
.-esImvg n=v Ett
-85 2-
- n-m c: me-
- g:se s
se am sa la[==.
gsBf e
s e
gs-
.:wm_[g m
,8 me us
gewa<
=ceswa s
- n=al gw.e su-se lugssav m=ssgs se
_..aegl-e=n sr-tl
- tw, s8
=s s
s
_e, gar m=~.wm
- _ssg sEassm-ew-s cm e
- s e
a mi-=vaW53n-a ew.=a ses e$3 3G53v e E,.,e ;"s mm 8
san _gg mR5sEsss.gans!g[
sEvaEss c=s melaEwEsser-Eg g8"WEE=e*en.g-= e see s
- gg-a gm
-=
- 8s..uf s-u ca v au t
Im m
s-as em a
m
,wwn Ri as a i
E.1520"
- 2
= 22 22 22*M==XMR2R
- = i i
T I l":$$$$: g
- = =T T T T T
T
=
=
7777777777777777777==============
TT
- o
==
==
$ $ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$ 3 t
- ====
=
= ==========~~~==~~==== ~
W!$$$$
$ $ $ h$$hhh$$h$iiiAA*TIA di s s < sNAda$geaA$sfdspfsi si ?s
- a;<xn; a
isssa e
1
i vs:
!!EEE9EEEE3BBER REE BE E E!R !!
(.
s
- s:
_E::
=,=,
mm me E=,I"
=,
s
=,
i Hi II R
g I
a:
R..RRERRRR5!.R.R.
< ORERR Rd.R.R
~
RJ RR R g:
<<<<e.
ldddS< < < m.5 d d.d.d.5 S d ' 5 5.d ' d d ds <<
ddS dd d5.dd
~t
.w
<<m 8":
w:
=
=
=
=
==
==
m:
s:
x x
=
g
==
==
s E:
S R
R C
R*
RC s
m:
R:
2 2
=
2 23 82 g
Wi mi W:
Et m
m m
m m
em m
e:
R":: W W
.W W
W WW W
=:
m a
E 2
W 2
g W
0
==W am 5
=
2 Ws
~
- =225 R
-E" s-d G
a 8"B
- =.se,8 E
.I m
- ,a e w m W,s m e 5
e es me e:t s
g We~
s =e =as
- s e
e ss a sg o
sme g*WE< mWE"s a-em 8
a g
e R!!
O 8
mm M
te me We a Emg m
m:*W_3,ss gs s W E
as m
- =-e aE"5t*s tpu 203g"wE DEW WS-s"tsI $.
~M i
155 E
sm W
WW m
- Ws ee=E*E s"a a
=E a "eg~Sgs a
sged8=5*W 2 mm "a-u n
a E sts~85-l"s x
sgwgagut
=
s
-e am ms
'8 85=53-WC*d"*
- d ms s
e_uMS"E8 d
. :: <legagses'55E x.og_"5.58 m"w"sE85m_5s~ga ons g: s eg smat g
-ex e
es e
s gegmEx..
.~ S
- s,,
8 mm m
m 1-2n...~..g E===
~m..
"5 ::
Z:
m gsg
- 2og 22g 2g 2220
~m m
~...
,f
\\
- ==================
==
(
~
~~~~
~
TMitiTRENERRE EmW RW Wan WW 32%W r
Wita111144444aa ada sa =n b' n$' b' 8 a aa'a 3
1 s:M833338848848 RdB BR d
d 8858 i
i siss. s. A s. is. s. d. e n.
(gi.
s e l Als se s ? A s v.;
y
,_2 W:
5:24 E Eg f
v;a=
v v
(
t 1
M 1
E:
S a.
g a
.r s E3 25 w
=:
ges e:
We v> vig t v:v.m m
~:
ind552 d5 g;
- <<sm<
<=
W!
W M
E w:
5:
E 22 E:
m:
a E
4R O
~
5 0:
l 5:
5:
1 W:
E.:
w.
m
(
5E
- g5
~
.om
- E512
- egs 5
E a
- eme a
8
.-.I d a 5 W
"E M
S: 55.. W.m5 1
2: m"O
=
a:es-8t8 5
- e._53 est E~W d!dg m w g
um e - e v,
- gao "E""
m 3
.=_5W=
.E. G _E R c
{
jE80 ***E
.g~83 EC 5
- g a mmme
{o$E EiE
- E e
E m
E5gmN 0 00 ful
- W*.4
- E :.20 e
- $.:.t.tI 44 4
44 e
t.e.t a.
(
. v> e m
v> v,.
~~
~
~~
5
.w...
$$ $5 5 55 5
m
.I
.E.Id d
d.$
5
OVESTION Id.
Identify the NRC officials, by position, responsible for the determination, approval and transmission of the NRC's findings of the biennial and interim reviews of State programs and describe this process including the role of the Commissioners.
ANSWER.
l The biennial and interim reviews of Agreement States are normally conducted by a Regional State Agreements Officer (RSA0). There is one RSA0 in each of l
NRC's five Regional Offices. They serve as the principal reviewer or, in the case of team reviews, review manager.
The reviews consist of a preliminary evaluation of information provided by the State undergoing review in advance of an actual visit. During the on-site review, additional information about the State's radiation control program is also evaluated. The RSA0 is
)
responsible for formulating the preliminary findings resulting from the review. The documented findings are submitted for review and approval by the following NRC officials in the Region and Headquarters:
Regional State Agreements Officer Regional Division Director (only in Region V)
Regional Administrator Assistant Director State Agreements Program, Office of State Programs Deputy Director, Office of State Programs Director, Office of State Programs Director, Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Materials Safety, Safeguards, and Operations Support Executive Director for Operations
5 OVESTION ]d, (Continued) 2 3
The Comission receives a copy of the review report and is advised of significant findings. However, the Comission is generally not involved in each review report.
N
OUEST10N 2a.
Identify all data reporting requirements required by NRC regulations for Agreement States (i.e., data to be reported to NRC by Agreement States).
Cite the applicable regulations and statutory basis for these requirements.
ANSWER.
7 There are no data reporting requirements required by NRC regulations for Agreement States. Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act provides the statutory basis for the Agreements negotiated between the NRC and Agreement States.
Each Agreement specifies that "The State and the Commission will use their best efforts to keep each other informed of proposed changes in their respective rules and regulations and licensing, inspection, and enforcement policies and criteria, and to obtain the comments and assistance of the other party therein." There are no other data reporting requirements.
l 1
00ESTION 2b.
Identify all data reporting requirements (in addition to those identified in Za) required by Agreements negotiated between NRC and Agreement States (i.e., data to be reported to NRC by Agreement States). Cite the regulatory and statutory bases for these requirements.
ANSWER.
As stated in the answer to question 2a., Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act provides the statutory basis for the Agreements negotiated between the NRC and Agreement States.
Each Agreement specifies that "The State and the Commission will use their best efforts to keep each other informed of proposed changes in their respective rules and regulations and licensing, inspection, and enforcement policies and criteria, and to obtain the comments and assistance of the other party therein."
There are no other data reporting requirements.
1 I
i 00ESTION 3a.
Describe the extent to which Agreement States are required to comply with Section 208 of the Energy Reorganization Act regarding identification of abnormal occurrences and the extent to which the NRC is required to include events that l
occur in Agreement States in NRC's annual report pursuant to this section.
Provide applicable regulatory and legal citations.
ANSWER.
Section 208 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 requires that the NRC submittoCongressaquarteriyreportlistinganyabnormaloccurrencesator associated with licensed facilities. Although Section 208 does not address abnormal occurrences involving Agreement State licensees, NRC requested Agreement State cooperation in providing such information to Congress. The NRC implemented an Agreement State abnormal occurrence reporting system on JJly 1, 1977.
There are no regulatory or legal requirements for Agreement States to report abnormal occurrences to the NRC. Agreement States voluntarily participate in the abnormal occurrence reporting program based on an agreement to exchange information on a periodic schedule.
As stated in our answer in question 2b., the NRC and Agreement States use their best efforts to keep each other informed on matters of mutual concerns.
The Agreement States provide events / incident reports to the NRC. The Office for Analysis & Evaluation of Operational Data (AE00), in coordination with the Office of State Programs (OSP), flags items appearing to reach the level of an abnormal occurrence and, through further communications with the State, a
OUESTION 3a.
(Continu:d) 2 decision is reached as to whether it qualifies as an abnormal occurrence. If the item is determined to be an abnormal occurrence, it is included in NRC's report to the Congress.
?
I I
i
(
OUESTION 4.
In response to Dennis Rathbun's letter of February 22, 1993 I
2
)
transmitting information regarding the Office of Agreement j
i States, I have the following questions:
1 b.
For those States which do have authority to issue l
I civil and criminal penalties respectively, identify which States have actually adopted regulations to t
implement such authority and the date such regulations d
'l were adopted.
4 ANSWER.
To the best of our knowledge, all Agreement States that have civil penalty
{
authority have adopted implementing rules as needed. The NRC does not have 1
current data on the dates the rules were adopted. While the Radiation Control i
Act of each Agreement State establishes criminal penalties, NRC does not have i
any data on criminal penalties.
i e
l i
i OVESTION 4.
In response to Dennis Rathbun's letter of February 22, 1993 i
transmitting information regarding the Office of Agreement j
i i
States, I have the following questions:
i c.
For those States that do have civil and criminal penalties, provide a comparison of each State's j
penalties to the comparable federal penalty.
i ANSWER.
i The NRC has not collected information on the States' civil and criminal l
4 penalties, only whether or not the individual States have authority to issue a
~
and collect civil penalties and who in each State may exercise these authorities.
I I
i I
l I
l
\\
i i
\\
= - _
l i
OUESTION 4.
In response to Dennis Rathbun's letter of February 22, 1993 i
transmitting information regarding the Office of Agreement States, I have the following questions:
i d.
For all Agreement States, ider.tify which States have, or do not have, criminal investigative capability (i.e., capability analogous to that of the NRC Office of Investigations).
ANSWER.
i I
No Agreement State has criminal investigative capability within the radiation control program analogous to that of the NRC Office of Investigations. All Agreement States have access to the criminal investigative services of the State or local police. States can also request assistance from the NRC.
l t
I i
1 4
?
i i
i I
w
-+
y-
1 l
OUEST10N 4 In response to Dennis Rathbun's letter of February 22, 1993 transmitting information regarding the Office of Agreement States, I have the following questions:
e.
For enforcement actions identified in Table #2, please provide definitions for each category, e.g., how are
" overdue inspections" and " impoundments" defined for the purpose of this table.
i 1
ANSWER.
" Civil Penalties" -
Administratively imposed and collected monetary fines, sometimes called " administrative fines." Similar to the civil penalties imposed by NRC.
" Impoundments" -
Any physical action which prevents the use of radioactive material. This may include securing in place (such as placing a seal on a storage container) up to and including seizure and removal from the premises of the licensee.
i
" Orders Issued" -
Written directives authorized by law commanding 1
performance without prior application or hearing. The State may be required to provide a public hearing within a specified time AFTER issuing the order.
" Overdue Inspections" - An inspection of a materials licensee is considered overdue if:
l i
i
)
I l
OVESTION 4e.
(Continued) 2 l
- 1. the time interval since the last previous inspection is greater than one and one-half times the l
l interval specified in accordance with the State's l
inspection schedule (inspection priority), or j
i t
- 2. the time interval since the license was issued is l
greater than one and one-half times the interval i
l specified in accordance with the State's inspection i
schedule (inspection priority).
" Enforcement. Conferences" - Formal meetings with the licensee, separate from any inspections, occurring either in the offices of
[
i the State radiation control program or at the i
licensee's facilities, during which violations of regulatory requirements by the licensee, the i
corrective actions by the licensee, and potential i
future enforcement actions by the RCP are discussed.
i
" Criminal Penalties" - Monetary fines or terms of imprisonment specified in a i
sentence by a court of criminal law for violations of the State radiation control act.
l 4
1 l
j I
l OUESTION 6a.
Provide the Phase I report from the task force examining
-i a
NRC's regional material program and state programs and common performance indicators.
i i
i ANSEB.
I l.
L 1
A copy of the Phase I report on NRC's Evaluation of the Regional Materials Program and Agreement State Radiation Control Programs is enclosed.
i b
Enclosure:
As stated t
i 1
e
'l I
i t
I i
l l
l i
?
,,,-.,,,,-.n
~., -...,
.e.,,
I i
e i
OUESTION 6b.
Provide _the May 28, 1992 preliminary examination of NRC and j
t State materials regulation programs (cited in Thompson j
I February 11, 1903 memo establishing the performance I
indicator task force).
l l
F ANSW[R.
f A copy of the May 28, 1992 preliminary examination of NRC and State materials i
regulation programs is enclosed.
l l
l t
Enclosure:
i e
As stated l
?
i.
l l
-i l
i l
l I
t' t
i I
L
}
I 3
i i.
l
~
.1
i i
OUESTION 6c.
Provide the December 26, 1991 memorandum from AEOD and State Programs to Hugh Thompson concerning these offices' f
I procedures for collecting data on misadministrations (cited j
i in NUREG-1272, Appendix C).
ANSWER.
i f
A copy of the December 26, 1991 memorandum concerning AE00 and SP's procedures f
for collecting data on misadministrations is enclosed.
l t
i i
i
Enclosure:
i As stated j
i l
i i
l l
l
l 1
(
i OUESTION 6d.
Provide all versions of NRC's " Criteria for Guidance of j
States and NRC in Discontinuance of NRC Regulatory Authority l
t and Assumption Thereof by States Through Agreement" utilized i
by NRC since 1975.
l I
i ANSWER.
The following documents are provided in response to this question:
1.
" Criteria for Agreements with States Under Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended." (Undated; Circa 1968) (Enclosure 1).
i 2.
Revision to add paragraph 28, "AEC Contractors" to the " Criteria for i
Guidance of States and AEC in Discontinuance of AEC Regulatory Authority and Assumption Thereof by States Through Agreement," dated 11/29/65 (Enclosure 2).
i i
l 3.
" Criteria for Guidance of States and NRC in Discontinuance of NRC i
Regulatory Authority and Assumption Thereof by States Through f
i Agreement," dated 1/23/81 (Enclosure 3).
l 4.
Revision of Criterion 29f of the " Criteria for Guidance of States and i
NRC in Discontinuance of NRC Regulatory Authority and Assumption Thereof l
by States Through Agreement," dated 7/16/81 (Enclosure 4).
l i
i l
i l
l I
l
OVESTION 6d.
(Continu:d) 2 5.
Revision of Statement of Policy of the " Criteria for Guidance of States and NRC in Discontinuance of NRC Regulatory Authority and Assumption Thereof by States Through Agreement," dated 7/21/83 (Enclosure 5).
Enclosures:
As stated
00ESTION 6e.
Provide copies of SECY 91-039, " Evaluation of Agreement State Compatibility Issues" and SECY 92-360.
ANSWER.
The following documents are provided in response to this question:
1.
SECY-91-039, " Evaluation of Agreement States Compatibility Issues" (Enclosure 1).
2.
SECY-92-360, "Results of the 1992 Follow-up Review of the Iowa Agreement
~
Program" (Enclosure 2).
Enclosures:
As stated
_m.
~
l i
OUESTION Ba.
Describe the statotory basis, practice and policy rationale l
l 1
for the variation in the extent to which Agreement States f
must adopt NRC regulations, including the categorization of NRC regulations into " divisions" with different requirements j
for adoption of different types of regulations, and the process used by NRC to make these determinations. Cite j
i applicable regulations.
j ANSWER:
t When the NRC staff developed guidance for adoption of NRC regulations by Agreement States, the legisl'tive history of section 274, " Cooperation With a
States," of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, was considered. The staff noted that throughout the legislative process which culminated in the enactment of section 274, emphasis was placed on the importance of, and the need for, continuing compatibility between Federal and State regulatory programs. This principle was reflected in the compatibility standard set ottt f
in section 274d(2) and g.
l "d.
The Commission shall enter into an agreement under subsection b. of i
this section with any State if---
I
"(2) the Comission finds that the State program is in accordance with the requirements of subsection o. and in all other respects compatible with the Commission's program for regulation of such materials, and that
~
OVESTION 8a.
(Continued) 2 the State program is adequate to protect the public health and safety with respect to the materials covered by the proposed agreement."
)
"g.
The Commission is authorized and directed to cooperate with the State in the formulation of standards for protection against hazards of radiation to assure that State and Commission programs for protection against hazards of radiation will be coordinated and compatible."
[ Emphasis added.]
The legislative history in the analysis of these sections of the Atomic Energy Act provided the following concerning the inclusion of subsections d. and g.:
1 1
)
l
" Subsection d. provides for certification by the Governor, and a finding i
by the Commission, before any agreement may be entered into.
It is intended to protect the public health and safety by assuring that the State program is adequate before the Commission may withdraw its i
regulatory responsibilities."
r
" Subsection g. provides that the Commission is authorized and directed to cooperate with the States in the formulation of standards for the protection of public health and safety from radiation hazards and to assure that State and Commission programs for protection against i
radiation hazards will be coordinated and compatible.
In most cases, it is intended that State and local standards should be the same as Federal standards in order to avoid conflict, duplication, or gaps."
i
OUESTION Ba.
(Continued) 3 "5.
The Joint Comittee believes it important to eruphasize that the radiation standards adopted by States under the agreements of this bill should either be identical or compatible with those of the Federal l
Government.
For this reason the comittee removed the language 'to the
]
extent feasible' in subsection g. of the original AEC bill considered at hearings from May 19 to 22, 1959. The comittee recognizes the importance of the testimony before it by numerous witnesses of the dangers of conflicting, overlapping, and inconsistent standards in I
different jurisdictions, to the hindrance of industry and jeopardy of
\\
public safety." Joint Comittee on Atomic Energy (JCAE) Report to accompany H.R. 8755 (H.R. Report No. 1125, September 2, 1959, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.) at pp. 9-11.
In order to provide guidance to the staff and to better implement the term
" compatibility," the Office of State Programs in 1984 adopted internal written procedures, " Internal Procedures, B.7 - Criteria for Compatibility Determinations" (Enclosure 1).
In the B.7 internal procedures, NRC rules are categorized according to the degree of uniformity necessary between NRC and Agreement State requirements.
Four categories were established. These four categories address the standards that States would be required to adopt in order to prevent hindrance to interstate comerce and to prevent ineffective comunication on radiation safety matters.
In addition, these categories address areas considered necessary for an effective radiation control program, but provide sufficient flexibility to allow States to address local ccnditions and to foster innovation.
The Division 1 Rules category addresses the concept of preventing
" conflicting, overlapping and inconsistent standards in different
i OVESTION 8a.
(Continued) 4 l
L l
j jurisdictions, to the hindrance of industry and jeopardy of public safety."
j
)
This division provides:
1' j
I i
i Division 1 Rules constitute those provisions of the NRC regulations that i
States are required to adopt, essentially verbatim, into their i
j regulations. These provisions include those that form the basic
{
s l
language of radiation protection essential for effective communication i
I between regulatory agencies and the regulated community. These provisions have been formulated and agreed to by national and I
l international organizations, using standards followed by industry and i
government. They include technical definitions, such as " curie,"
1
" dose," and " rad;" radiation standards, such as occupational exposure 4
limits, and effluent release limits; and legal definitions, such as l
t definitions for " byproduct material," " restricted area," and -
" occupational dose." These provisions are so basic to the regulatory i
i programs that their modification by a State would result in numerous and j
difficult problems, including interference in interstate commerce.
y l
l i
t The categories of rules where flexibility could be allowed are addressed by Division 2 and Division 3 rules. Division 2 Rules are other provisions in NRC rules that States must address in their regulations because these rules include basic principles of radiation safety and regulatory functions.
However, the use of identical language to that of the NRC is r-t necessary i
provided the underlying principles are the same. The States may adopt more stringent or restrictive rules than the NRC in this area. Division 3 Rules are those provisions in NRC regulations which would be appropriate for Agreement States to adopt, but which do not require any degree of uniformity u
1 OUESTION 8a.
(Continued) 5 l
between NRC and States rules. Division 4 Rules are certain regulatory l
l functions which are reserved to the NRC pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act and 10 CFR Part 150.
i When NRC rules were initially categorized in the B.7 procedure in 1984, in order to assist the States in preparing and updating their regulations and the
]
j NRC staff in reviewing them for compatibility at that time, OSP staff informed the Agreement States and other NRC offices of the approach being taken, but l
did not seek concurrence in the determinations. At present, when compatibility categories are determined for new rules, it is done through j
collaboration with the States, the Commission, and other NRC program offices.
i j!
Enclosure:
l r
f As stated l
t I
i i
t f
3 I
a 4
4 L
d
- e. - - - -
.. ~--
-ns w
DUFSTION 8e.
Identify all Agreement States that have already adopted regulations consistent with the revised 10 CFR Part 20 f
radiation protection regulations.
i ANSWER.
As of April 1,1993, no States are known to have adopted rules equivalent to
{
the revised 10 CFR Part 20.
However, they all are aware of the January 1994 1
deadline for promulgating a compatible rule. The Agreement States have been
~
furnished a " draft" Suggested State Regulation for revised Part 20 on which to pattern their regulation, and OSP staff is reviecing and commenting on drafts i
of State regulations furnished by the States. We havs polled the States regarding whether they will have the new Part 20 rule in place by the due date of January 1994. With the exception of Kansas, all Agreement States have j
indicated they plan to have the rule on their books by the deadline. Kansas i
is proceeding with a revision but may not complete the rulemaking by the due date.
l l
t h
i
OUESTION 9c.
Identify any and all a tions initiated by the NRC under Section 274(j)(1) of the Atomic Energy Act since 1975.
ANSWER.
No actions taken by the Commission, as authorized by Section 274j(1) of the Atomic Energy Act, have been initiated by the NRC. The following actions, as authorized by Section 274j(1) of the Atomic Energy Act, have been taken at the request of the affected State. The NRC may have initiated the discussions in some cases, but the decision to request termination was made by the Governor of each State.
Arizona - termination of the uranium mill portion of the Agreement (1980)
Idaho - termination of the uranium mill portion of the Agreement (1982)
Nebraska - termination of the uranium mill portion of the Agreement (1982) i New Mexico - termination of the uranium mill portion of the Agreement, (1986)
Idaho - termination of Agreement, (Pf91) t
l 1
i i
OVESTION 9d.
Describe the NRC's procedures and criteria for termination or suspension of an agreement with a State pursuant to the
" emergency situations" authority under Section 274(j)(2) of the Atomic Energy Act and provide copies of the pertinent regulations, policy guidance, and any other documentation of these procedures and criteria.
l ANSWER.
l l
Subsection j(2) was added to Section 274j of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, in 1980 by Public Law 96-295 (94 Stat 787). This subsection gives l
the Commission the authority, upon its own motion or at the request of the Governor, to temporarily suspend all or part of its Agreement with a State without notice of hearing if, in the judgement of the Commission, two conditions exist:
(1) an emergency situation exists with respect to any material covered by such Agreement creating a danger which requires immediate action to protect the health and safety of persons either within or outside of the State; and (2) the State has failed to take the steps necessary to contain or eliminate the cause of the danger within a reasonable time after the situation arose. The Commission is only authorized to exercise such authority to the extent necessary to contain or eliminate the danger. Office of State Programs Internal Procedure D.13 (Enclosure 1) provides guidelines for the staff to follow when considering whether or not to recommend that the Commission exercise the authority in Section 274j(2). The guidelines discuss the approach to be taken with the State, the minimum technical criteria, and other factors to be used in the staff's evaluation and cancellation of the temporary suspension. The guidelines stress the importance of NRC staff working with the State and providing technical assistance in dealing with emergency situations and notes that invoking this authority would only be as a
OUESTION 9d.
(Ccntinu d) 2 last resort where the State was unable to take, or was prevented from taking, j
the necessary steps to protect public health and safety. As noted on the answer to Question 9e., the Commission has never exercised the authority l
granted by Section 274j(2).
Enclosure:
'l As stated i
i
?
l l
i l
4 I
t
....\\
l OUESTION 9e.
Identify any and all actions initiated by the NRC under Section 274(j)(2) of the Atomic Energy Act taken since 1975.
ANSWER.
There have been no actions taken by the Comission pursuant to the provisions of Section 274j(2) of the Atomic Energy Act.
t I
l i
i
\\
00ESTION 10a.
The NRC routinely issues a letter to Agreement State officials communicating the findings of its reviews of Agreement State programs. These letters are usually issued several months after the review is completed and often describe actions taken by the State in the interim period.
Describe the NRC's procedures and parameters for issuance of these letters including timeliness of transmittal and collection of additional information in the interim period, and provide the documentation establishing these procedures and parameters.
f l
ANSWER.
I The Office of State Programs -(OSP) Internal Procedure D.2 (Enclosure 1), deals with the subject of issuing letters to State officials transmitting the results of the NRC reviews of the State's radiation control program.
It should be noted that the findings of each program review are communicated to the State Health Officer, or equivalent (e.g. Commsioner of Health, Director of Health) at a close-out meeting following completion of the review. The i
review letter serves to confirm the findings in writing and to request l
corrective action. The NRC Regional State Agreements Officer (RSA0) prepares the review letter, coordinates with OSP and NRC regional management and transmits it electronically to OSP for review and signature of the Director, OSP. Concurrence is obtained from the respective Regional Administrator, the Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards, the Office of General Counsel, as appropriate, the Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Materials Safety, Safeguards and Operations Support and the Executive Director for
-i Operations.
Prior to dispatching the letter the Director, OSP, telephones the l
l l
State Health Officer and the Radiation Control Program Director to inform them
l I
OVESTION 10a, (Continued) 2 l
of the contents of the letter and answer any questions. The goal is to complete this process within 45 days, but the timing may be dictated in some cases by the nature of the review findings. This procedure for handling the review letters provides Headquarters oversight of the review findings and t
provides an indication to the State Health Officer of the importance NRC attaches to the State program reviews.
It should be emphasized that in most
{
cases the State begins taking any necessary corrective action as soon as the areas needing improvement are pointed out by the reviewer.
In some cases, l
depending on the nature of the corrective action required, such action is completed before the RSA0 concludes the review or before the review letter is j
issued. Also, the RSA0 follows up with the State on their progress in dealing
[
~
with any findings requiring prompt attention.
l I
Enclosure I
As stated l
I i
)
i
OVESTION 10b.
Describe how these practices were changed by the 1987 reorganization.
ANSWER.
Prior to the 1987 reorganization, the program review letters were basically handled as described in the answer to Question 10a. except that the letters were signed by the NRC Regional Administrator rather than by the Director, Office of State Programs.
(
4 I
l
o DNE HUNDRED THIRD CDNGRESS Congress of the Enited $tates mase er Rqntientatus COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS 2157 Raysung Houst Omet Bueno
[
WAsMinciom. DC 20515-8143 l
f
[
March 25, 1993 The Honorable Ivan Selin Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Chairman:
Pursuant to its authority under Rules X and XI of the U.S.
House of Representatives, the Subcommittee on Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources has been conducting a review of the activities of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in the regulation of Agreement States under Section 274 of the Atomic 5
Energy Act.
Agreement States regulate approximately two thirds of all materials licensees in the United States.
Subcommittee staff has conducted a number of interviews with representatives of the Office of State Programs, the Office of General Counsel, and the Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) and has communicated the Subcommittee's l
interest in obtaining additional information concerning the Agreement State program.
In order to clarify the exact nature of the regulatory and data collection requirements that apply to Agreement States and to assist the Subcommittee in understanding the performance of the NRC's Agreement State program, please provide the following documents and information:
la)
Copies of all-NRC letters, States' responses, confirmatory
)
communications, and supporting documentation including I
questionnaires, review comments, and review findings for all biennial program reviaws and interim reviews for the following States for the period 987 to the present:
i
l l
Louisiana Mississippi New Mexico f
Texas l
Arizona l
California North Dakota Washington lb)
Copies of al'. NRC letters; confirmatory communications; supporting documentation including questionnaires, review I
ccmments, and file reviews; and intra-agency memoranda and communications, including field notes and memoranda prepared by NRC regional Agreement State program personnel; related to all biennial program reviews and interim reviews for the following Statas for the period 1980 to the present:
Maryland New Hampshire New York Tennessee Iowa Nebraska Idaho l
Ic)
Copies of all NRC "All Agreement States" letters and communications sent to all Agreement States, or subgroups of Agreement States, within the past five years.
i Id)
Identify the NRC officials, by position, responsible for the i
determination, approval and transmission of the NRC's findings of the biennial and interim reviews of State programs and describe l
this process including the role of the Commissioners.
i l
2a)
Identify all data reporting requirements required bv NRC i
reculations for Agreement States (i.e. data to be reported to NRC i
l by Agreement States).
Cite the applicable regulations and statutory basis for these requirements.
2b)
Identify all data reporting requirements (in addition to l
those identified in 2a) required bv acreements negotiated between i
NRC and Agreement States (i.e. data to be reported to NRC by Agreement States).
Cite the regulatory and statutory bases for these requirements.
2c)
Identify all types of data reported to NRC by Agreement States on a voluntary basis (in addition to those identified in 2a and 2b).
(
2d)
Identify, for each category of data identified in Items 2a, 2b, and 2c, the Agreement States which have and have not reported data for each year for the past five years (1988 through 1992) 2 f
I
)
and include the date on which the report was submitted.
Note where submissions have been received, but not within NRC deadlines.
i 3a)
Describe the extent to which Agreement States are required to comply with Section 208 of the Energy Reorganication Act regarding identification of abnormal occurrences and the extent to which the NRC is required to include events that occur in Agreement States in NRC's annual report pursuant to this section.
Provide applicable regulatory and legal citations.
3b)
Describe current NRC practice for reporting abnormal occurrences which occur in Agreement States including the role of AEOD and NRC's procedures for ensuring that the data collected from Agreement States is complete and accurate.
3c)
Appendix C of the AEOD Annual Report (NUREG-1272) contains a report on Nonreactor Events and Misadministrations.
Events reported span more than one year'and include reports from only 16 of 29 Agreement States.
Explain why AEOD's annual report does not include data from all of the 29 Agreement States.
Explain how events and misadminstrations reported by AEOD are actually collected and how AEOD certifies the accuracy of data reported by i
Agreement States.
3d)
The data collected from Agreement States as part of biennial compliance and adequacy reviews appears to include reporting of incidents and enforcement actions involving nuclear materials and licensees.
Explain the purpose and content of the information l
reported by the States, and collected by NRC, as part of these reviews and the extent to which this infornation is inclusive of all incidents, over-exposures, license violations and enforcement actions which occur in Agreement States.
(
3e)
Is the data reported in the routine Agreement State reviews discussed in Item 4(d) also reported to AEOD, and to what extent l
does AEOD rely upon and include this information in its analytical work and annual reports?
3f)
Provide all responses to the Office of State Programs request for information from Agreement States dated December 17, 1992.
4)
In response to Dennis Rathbun's letter of February 22, 1993 transmitting information regarding the Office of Agreement States, I have the following questions:
a)
For all Agreement States, including those where enforcement actions are identified (Item #3 of the letter),
l identify which States actually have and do not have legal authority to issue civil and criminal penalties, respectively, 3
l
and the date such authority was enacted.
I b)
For those States which do have authority to issue civil and criminal penalties respectively, identify which states have actually adopted regulations to implement such authority and the date such regulations were adopted.
c)
For those states that do have civil and criminal penalties, provide a comparison of each States' penalties to the comparable federal penalty.
d)
For all Agreement States, identify which States have, or do not have, criminal investigative capability (i.e.
capability analogous to that of the NRC Office of Investigations).
j e)
For enforcement actions identified in Table #2, please provide definitions for each category, e.g. how are " overdue inspections" and " impoundments" defined for the purpose of this table.
i f)
Describe the extent to which NRC requires Agreement States to possess civil and criminal penalty authority and to possess investigative capability.
g)
For inspection frequencies identified in Table #3, describe the empirical basis for the information provided.
Is this information based on actual inspection rates or on the compilation of States' written procedures?
How has NRC verified the accuracy of these frequencies?
h)
Provide the data in Table 2, for each Agreement State, for each category of materials license, for each of the past five years, and calculate the rate of violations and enforcement actions per 100 licensees fore each category, for each State, for each year.
Categories of material licenses should be those used by AEOD in its annual report (see Table A-1, NUREG-1272, Appendix A).
t Sa)
Provide the number of medical misadministrations, for each Agreement State, for each of the past five years, and calculate the rate of misadministrations per 100 licensees, for each State, for each year.
Sb)
Provide the number of radiation exposures in excess of 10 CFR Part 20 limits, for each Agreement State, for each category of materials. license, for each of the past five years, and calculate the rate of such exposures as a percentage of l
radiation workers (as reported by AEOD in Table 2.3 of the AEOD annual report) and per 100 licensees for each category, for each State, for each year.
Categories of material licenses should be those used by AEOD in its annual report (see Table A-1, NUREG-4 l
~
i 1272, Appendix A).
t Sc)
Provide the number of incidents of lost, stolen er abandoned materials (including sealed sources), for each Agreement State, fpr each category of materials license, for each of the past five years and calculate the rate of such losses per 100 licensees for each category of materials license, for each State, for each year.
Categories of material licenses should be those used by AEOD in its annual report (see Table A-1, NUREG-1272, Appendix A).
5d)
For each NRC region, identify the number of Agreement States and the number of Agreement State licensees in each State, by category of materials license, for each of the past five years, i
Categories of material licenses should be those used by AEOD in its annual report (see Table A-1, NUREG-1272, Appendix A).
i 6a)
Provide the Phase I report from the task force examining NRC's regional material program and state programs and common performance indicators.
l l
6b)
Provide the May 28, 1992 preliminary examination of NRC and State naterials regulation programs (cited in Thompson February i
- 11. 1993 memo establishing the performance indicator task force).
l 6c)
Provide the December 26, 1991 memorandum from AECD and State Programs to Hugh Thompson concerning these offices' procedures for collecting data on misadministrations (cited in NUREG-1272, Appendix C).
6d)
Provide all versions of NRC's " Criteria for Guidance of States and NRC in Discontinuance of NRC Regulatory Authority and Assumption Thereof by States Through Agreement" utilized by NRC since 1975.
i 6e)
Provide copies of SECY 91-039
" Evaluation of Agreement State Comparability Issues" and SECY 92-360.
7a) Provide the detailed budget of the activities of the Office f
of State Programs for each Fiscal Year 1989 through 1993 l
including regional office activities and training prograns and l
the detailed budget for Fiscal Year 1994 when that budget is approved by the agency.
For regional activities, identify
(
t funding by region.
e 7b)
Identify the number of Full Time Equivalent (FTE) personnel assigned to activities of the Office of State Programs for each Fiscal Year 1989 through 1993 including regional office activities and for Fiscal Year 1994 when the budget for that year is approved by the agency.
For regional office activities, l
identify the nunber of personnel by region.
5 i
1 l
i
7c)
Describe the source of funding for the activities of the Office of State Programs including ti.e extent to which it is supported by appropriated funds, user-fees imposed on NRC licensees, and user-fees and reimbursements from Agreement States or Agreement State licensees.
7d)
Identify any additional NRC resources (funding and personnel), such as Office of General Counsel and Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, which support the activities of the Office of State Programs, and identify the source of such funds.
Ba)
Describe the statutory basis, practice and policy rationale for the variation in the extent to which Agreement States must adopt NRC regulations, including the categorization of NRC regulations into " divisions" with different requirements for adoption of different types of regulations, and the process used by NRC to make these determinations.
Cite applicable regulations.
8b)
Provide a table showing which NRC regulations, otherwise applicable to the categories of materials licenses regulated by Agreement States, are actually required to be adopted by Agreement States and which are not required to be adopted.
Bc)
Describe the statutory basis, practice, and policy rationale for NRC's general practice of allowing Agreement States a period of three years to adopt those NRC regulations which NRC deems necessary for State compatibility.
8d)
Identify any exceptions to the "three year rule" (cited in Item Sc above),
i.e. adoption of 10 CFR Part 20 radiation protection regulations revisions, and explain the rationale and statutory basis for these exceptions.
s Be)
Identify all Agreement States that have already adopted regulations consistent with the revised 10 CFR Part 20 radiation protection regulations.
8f)
Describe the extent to which Agreement States are required to adopt NRC's regulatory guidance in their adoption of NRC regulations to meet NRC's compatibility requirements, including use of and adherence to NRC regulatory guides.
8g)
Will Agreement States be required to adopt the NRC l
regulatory guide on *ALARA Levels for Effluents from Materials Facilities" (now Draft Regulatory Guide DG-8013)?
If so, to what extent?
9a)
Identify the NRC officials, by position, responsible for the negotiation and approval of agreements with States executed pursuant to Section 274 and amendments to such agreements and describe the process for negotiation, approval, and amendment of L
6 l
l 1
n
I such agreements including the role of the Cc=missioners.
9b)
Describe the NRC's specific procedures and criteria for termination or suspension of all or part of an agreement with a State pursuant to Section 274 (j ) (1) of the Atomic Energy Act and provide copies of the pertinent regulations, policy guidance, and any other documentation of these procedures and criteria.
9c)
Identify any and all actions initiated by the NRC under Section 274 (j ) (1) of the Atomic Energy Act since 1975.
9d)
Describe the NRC's procedures and criteria for termination or suspension of an agreement with a state pursuant to the i
" emergency situations" authority under Section 274 (j ) (2) of the Atent.c Energy Act and provide copies of the pertinent l
regulations, policy guidance, and any other documentation of these procedures and criteria.
l 9e)
Identify any and all actions initiated by the NRC under Section 274 (j ) (2) of the Atomic Energy Act taken since 1975.
9f)
In 1978, Congress amended Section 274 through enactment of P.L.95-604.
Section 274 was amended again in 1980 by P.L.96-295.
Section 274 was amended a third time in 1982 by P.L.97-415.
For each statutory change, describe the changes made in NRC procedures to reflect such change and provide copies of the pertinent SECY papers, Office of General Counsel memoranda, and other materials documenting the incorporation of these statutory changes into NRC regulations, policies, and procedures.
10a) The NRC routinely issues a letter to Agreement State officials communicating the findings of its reviews of Agreement State programs.
These letters are usually issued several months i
after the review is completed and often describe actions taken by the State in the interim period.
Describe the NRC's procedures and parameters for issuance of these letters including timeliness of transmittal and collection of additional information in the interim period, and provide the documentation establishing these procedures and parameters.
i 10b) Describe how these practices were changed by the 1987 reorganization.
11)
Describe the extent to which NRC has routine access to an Agreement State's regulatory, investigative and enforcement records, record keeping requirements imposed on Agreement State's for this purpose and identify any exceptions under which an Agreement State may withhold or " seal" regulatory, investigative i
or enforcement records from NRC review.
Provide relevant citations.
12a) In the conduct of its biennial reviews of Agreement States, 9
l 1
.~_
NRC does not appear to review licensing or enforcement files of licensees identified in the States' questionnaire as the subject of enforcement actions or involved in incidents related to the handling and use of nuclear materials.
Describe the basis for the file reviews conducted by the NRC in its biennial reviews and 1
provide citations to NRC procedures governing these reviews.
12b) Describe the extent to which NRC reviews licensee files where enforcement actions have been taken by an Agreement State or where a licensee has been involved in an incident,and the procedures that apply to such reviews.
Provide citations to NRC procedures governing the reviews of States' enforcement actions.
i 12c) Describe the role of the Office of State Programs in l
reviewing the actions taken by the State of Maryland with regard l
to that State's regulation of Neutron Products, Inc. and. Sacred Heart Hospital and provide all written communications between NRC and the State of Maryland concerning these two licensees since 1987.
13a) Various Atomic Energy Act licensees, such as nuclear I
pharmacies, conduct operations in numerous locations covered by multiple NRC and Agreement State licenses.
Describe the process the NRC utilizes for tracking licensee activities and overlapping license obligations, e.g. corporate responsibility for radiation i
safety, at multiple locations for NRC licensees and for Agreement States.
Include applicable regulatory citations.
i-t 13b) Describe the process NRC utilizes to track, and to communicate to Agreement States, license violations and enforcement actions taken against Atomic Energy Act licensees and employees, including criminal prosecutions, by NRC, the U.S.
Department of Justice and Acreement States.
Include applicable regulatory citations.
13c) Identify and describe what restrictions exist on Agreement States, under their Agreement status, governing the hiring by Agreement State licensees and the licensing of personnel who have l
been subject to enforcement actions (such as prohibitions on performing radiation safety or supervisory functions) or criminal prosecutions by NRC, the U.S. Department of Justice, or other Acreement States.
i In order to assist the Subcommittee, please transmit the requested information as it becomes available, though not later j
than April 16, 1993.
In addition to this request, the Subcommittee will make separate requests for information concerning NRC regulatory practices governing nuclear materials licensees and related data collected by AEOD.
If you or your staff have any questions concerning this request, please contact David Berick of the Subcommittee staff at 202-225-6427.
I i
i 8
l Thank you for your continuing cooperation with the Subcommittee.
S4 cerely, l
l l
IIIKE SYNAR l
Chairman Subcommittee on Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources cc:
The Honorable J.
Dennis Hastert Ranking Minority Member l
9
i l
CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE SYSTEX DOCUMENT PREPARATION CEECKLI2T This checklist is
- he suhaitted with each document (or group of Gs/As) sent for.
ing into the CCS.
1.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION CP DOCUXENT(S) e M dA
/
v'
/)
2.
TTPE or toCUMEMF Correepondense.
Roaringen(Qs/As) 3.
DOCUXENT CONTROL Sensitive (WRC Caly)
Non-Semeitive 4.
CONGRESSIONAL Coxx1TTER and SUBCOXMITTEES (if applicable) i Congressional Committee Subcommittee 5.
SUBJECT CODES (a)
(b)
(c) 6.
SOURCE OF DOCUMENTS (a) 5420 (document name L
(b)
_ Scan.
(c)
At'tachments (d)
_ Rakey (a) other 7.
SYSTZM LOS DATES (R) 93 Date OCA seat document to CCS (b)
Data CCS receiven2 doounaat (c)
Date returned to OCA for additional information (d)
Date resubmitted by-OCA to CCS
~
(a)
Data entered into CCS by
~
(f)
Date OCA notified that document is in CCS CoxxENTS 130069
.