ML20044C451

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Comments on Document Entitled, Unc Naval Products, Final Decontamination & Decommissioning Surveys/Book 4, Montville,Connecticut
ML20044C451
Person / Time
Site: 07000371
Issue date: 01/12/1993
From: Jaberaboansari
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
To: Roth J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20044C438 List:
References
NUDOCS 9303230050
Download: ML20044C451 (4)


Text

lpththnekt1:

M O R I. S E.

oAst kepor: iNstiTutt s oar sc8LNCf' AND f()UCAlsON 0

L NF RGY/t"NVikONAAi'NT S Y$TI' M% twit,14.)N

' January 12,1993 t

?

1 Mr. Jerome Roth Region 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 j

SUBJECT:

UNC NAVAL PRODUCTS, FINAL.~ DECONTAMINATION ~ ANDi

~

DECOMMISSIONING SURVEYS / BOOK 4, MONTVILLE, CONNECTICUT -

Dear Mr. Roth:

The Environmental Survey and Site Assessment Program (ESSAP) of the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) has reviewed the subject document.

The attached comments are. offered for your consideration. If you have any -

. questions or comments please contact me at (615) 576-3355 or Michele Landis at-4 (615) 576-2908.

. Sincerely, ffs. /

Armirs Jade #raboansari Project Leader l

Environmental Survey '

.{

and Site Assessment Program

j

, y

~ AJ:cw cc:

J. Parrott, NRC/NMSS, T. Mo, NRC/NMSS, D. Tiktinsky,- NRC/NMSS, _

.i J. Swift /F. Brown,' NRC/NMSS, l

J. Kinneman, NRC/ Region l'

M. Landis/ ORISE.
J. Berger, ORISE y

' PMDA. -

.i File 9303230050 930312' LN c, PDR. - ADOCK 07000371 C

ppg

<i

'4 F

-- 4 O. BOX 117. OAK RoGE, TENNESSEE 37831-0117 Managed and operated by oak Ridge Associaied Universitieilar the U.s, Departmarnt of Energy

- g 4

Mr. Roth January 12,1993 Many of the following comments are minor although they should be addressed or clarified. The only major deficiency is that the alpha floor scan data are not provided for any of the areas surveyed. In addition, the traffic ways and the door ways should have been scanned independent of the random grid block selection process.

1)

P. 8, last para. " dose rate" should be " exposure rate".

2)

P.ll, fist para. The method by which a " statistically significant number of survey points" was determined should be described.

3)

P.ll, last para.

It is stated that measurements were performed "as previously described". A specific reference should be provided.

4)

Building A. The maps provided for the basement on pages SGM9 and SGM10 do not agree. The scale for one of the figures is probably incorrect.

5)

Building A, " Tested Survey Results". The heading of " grid block" for the first column is not appropriate.

6)

Building A, Page RBS3. There is no description for biased point #50.

7)

Building M, Page SGM10. The walls are labeled incorrectly. on the map of the Magnaflux Room.

8)

Warm-Roll Room:

a)

Grid line intersection D8 (page LSS1) does not appear to be located on either the floor or the walls, b)

Grid block A12 (page LSS5)is not part of the floor.

c)

Page LSS6 is mislabeled. It should be RBSI.

9)

Vapor Grit Blast:

a)

On pages LSSI and LSS2, it is not clear what the difference is between grid point F9 and F9A, F8 and F8A, etc.

b)

Grid blocks H9, F9, and F10 (page LSS4) are not part of the floor.

l l

l l

l h

4

Mr. Roth January 12,1993 10)

Building E. The dimensions of the Fuel Storage Area on page SGM8 do not agree with that provided on page SGM1.

11)

Appendix T. For all the areas listed in this appendix:

t a)

There are no beta / gamma measurements.

b)

There are no measurements for removable alpha or beta activity.

c)

The locations of direct alpha measurements on pages RSSI through RSS31 are neither described in a table nor indicated on the drawings.

d)

Page RSS19 and RSS20 are duplicates.

12)

Appendix U.

a)

On pages 'RSS1 through RSS5, for each grid point, there are multiple entries with different values. This should b:: clarified.

b)

For a number of areas included in this Appendix, the locations of direct alpha i

measurements are neither described nor indicated on the drawings.

c)

There are no data provided for security tower SAS.

I d)

It is not clear where the " Guard. Tower on Roof" ( Page RSS32) is located. No description is provided for locations of direct alpha measurements, e)

Is the Pump House South facility included in this survey?

1 f

I i

s e