Text

Forwards Seventh Joint Monthly Status Rept on Emergency Preparedness,In Response to .Rept Current as of 820129
	ML20042C547
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	03/08/1982
From:	Giuffrida L, Palladino N; Federal Emergency Management Agency, NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To:	Simpson A; SENATE
Shared Package
ML20042C542	List: ML20042C541; ML20042C547;
References
	NUDOCS 8203310506
	Download: ML20042C547 (50)
	v • d • e

1 6*

e.

i M8 1982 The Honorable Alan K. Simpson, Chairman Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation Committee on Environment and Public Works United States Senate Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Chairman:

This is our seventh joint monthly status report on energency preparedness for nuclear power plants in response to your letter of June 8,1981. ' This report responds to the questions posed in your letter and is current as of January 29, 1982.

The report briefly describes the actiond taken by our agencies to upgrade emergency preparedness at and around nuclear power plant sites.

The report includes the latest schedules which our two agencies have discussed and a synopsis of the related actions which are involved.

Our staffs will continue to work together to resolve any problems involving schedules.-

Please notify us-if yea desire any additional information.

i Ej ncerely,.

y Nunzio OP'alladino, Chainnan U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

+

Louis 0. Giuffrida, Director Federal Emergency Management Agency

Enclosure:

Joint Monthly Status Report cc:

The Honorable Gary Hart 8203310506 820329 PDR ADOCK 05000322 O

PDR

ENCLOSURE 1 e

NRC/ FEMA JOINT MONTHLY REPORT TO CONGRESS ON EMERGE.4CY PREPAREDNESS

. December 30, 1981 to January 29_, 1982 This is the seventh monthly status report.to Congress in response to the direction given in the June 8,1981 letter from the Nuclear Regulation Subcommittee. This report provides the status of each agency's radio-logical emergency planning review and approval activities for nuclear power pl, ants.

The' report is organized in Jtwo parts.

Part I was prepared by the NRC and responds to questions la, 2, 3a and 4.of the June 8, 1981 letter. Tables 1

-and 2 provide the status of offsite and onsite emergency planning for applicants for an operating license. ; Table-3 provides the status of overall emergency pla.ining for operating reactors. Table 4 describes NRC staffing level s.

Part II was prepared by FEMA and responds to questions 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Decision and' Hearing Dates are consistent with those reported to the House

~

Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development. -They do not account for potential added impacts resulting from offsite energency preparedness ~ finding delays.

NRC and FEMA have identified 8 sites where findings on offsite preparedness may impact the' licensing process. The potential delay due to the state of offsite emergency preparedness is 21 months.

'The NRC scheduling assumption is that FEMA will provide findings and determina-tions that plans are adequate and that there is reasonable assurance that they can be implemented.

NRC is proposing to amend its regulations to provide that, for issuance of operating licenses authorizing only fuel loading and low power operation (up to 5% o~f rated power), no NRC or FEMA review, findings, and determinations concerning the state of or adequacy of offsite emergency preparedness shall be necessary.

The NRC review of'the' ensite:plantw'ill include an assessment of those offsite elements.which are necessary to evaluate the applicant's response mechanism.

If adopted, the rule could eliminate some if not all review delays.

a g

e a

PART I

' Background - Operating Reactors

~

The emergency preparedness rule that became effective November 3,1980, required licensees to submit upgraded emergency plans by January 2,1981; to submit emergency procedures to activate the plans by Parch 1,1981; to have the emergency plans and procedures implemented by April 1,1981; and to demonstrate that administrative and physical means have been established for alerting.and providing prompt instructions to the public within the 10-mile plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ) by July 1, 1981. (The Commission has recently revised the. July 1,1981 date to February 1,'1982).

In addition, the emergency preparedness rule required the licensees, working with State and local governments, to implement an integrated upgraded emergency plan for the ingestion pathway EPZ out to

~

the 50-mile' radius around each operating nuclear power plant. Guidance for meeting the-upgraded em'ergency preparedness requirements is provided in NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency. Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants."

The NRC.and the ' Federal Ememency Management Agency (FEMA) developed a Memoran'dum. of Understanding (MOU). dated November 4,1980, that describes each agency's responsibility for radiological emergency preparedness at and around nuclear power plants. According to the MOU, NRC and FEMA determine the adequacy of emergency preparedness by licensees and State and local governments, respectively. To make the respective determinations, NRC reviews licensee emergency plans,iFEMA reviews the emergency plans of offsite authorities, and both observe and evaluate joint exercises conducted by licensees and by State and' local government organizations.

In addition,

. NRC performs onsite appraisals to evaluate the adequacy of licensees emergency creparedness programs. The KRC reviews the FEMA findings and determinations

~

to assertain the overall state of emergency preparedness.

The schedule projected for NRC to complete the re' view of the licensee plans and the onsite appraisals for all operating power reactors is about April 1,1982. A joint exercise will also be observed at most

' sites.by NRC and FEMA by about April 1,1982. These joint exercises are being held to meet the present requirement in the emtrgency preparedness j

rule that, effective April 1,1981, all operating reactors conduct

~

annual exercises of their emergency plans.

4 1

4 b

9

Backaround - Reac. tors Under Construction The NRC rule (10 CFR 50.47 (a)) for emergency preparedness specified that NRC will issue no operating license (OL) untti there is reasonable assurance that adequate measure: can and will be taken to protect the j

public in the event of an emergency. This reasonable assurance must t

include the pre.paredness capabilities of both the licensees and State and local organizations.

In a memorandum of understanding with NRC, FEMA agreed to make findings and determinations on the adequacy of State and local emergency plans.

FD1A also agrted to provide expert witnesses in NRC's licensing process.

NP.C agreed to review FEFA findings and determinations, and to make decisions on the overall state of emergency preparedness (i.e., integration of emergency preparedness onsite as determined by the NRC and effsite as determined by FEMA and reviewed by NRC) before issuing operating licenses.

There is concern that findings on offsite areparedness issues will not be available on a schedule that is compati)le with the NRC licensing schedule.

There is also concern that inadequate State and local plans, over which licensees have no direct control, could delay the issuance of operating licenses.

In some cases, action by State legislatures has been necessary before the licensee, State, and local plans could be legally implemented in the State affected. Similar actions are pending in a few other cases.

FD1A concurs with these statements and the schedules given in Table 1.

9 w

k-e q 6

D 2

l o

KEY TO TABLES i

i

~

Table 1 - Status of Offsite Emergency Plannino - Operating License Reviews Table ? - Status of Onsite Emergency Plannino - Operatino License Reviews Table 3 - Status of Emergency Planning for Operating Reactors Column 1 - Dates of licensee subnittal of revised emergency plans per10CFR50.54(u)

Column 2 - Dates of initial onsite visits by NRC staff to review and discuss Ticensee's emergency planning efforts Column 3 - Dates of latest NRC action other than appraisal reviews for each nuclear power plant Column 4 - Dates of scheduled start of 2-week onsite emergency preparedness appraisal to verify implementation of licensee's emergency program Column S - Dates of issue of NRC report resulting from the onsite appraisal Column 6 - Requested dates for FEMA to provide NRC with their finding on the status of preparedness in the environs of each operating nuclear power plant l

Table 4 - NRC Staff Positions Assioned to Review Onsite Emeroency Plans for Power Reactors at Regional and Headouarters Locations M

Q f

O M

l I

3

.o

~

^

I STATUS OF OFFSITE EMERGENCY PLANNING i

OPERATING LICENSE REVIEWS

~

PROPOSED INTERIM LICENSINGLEGISLATIONSJ ESTIMATED FEMA 0FFSITE EP-FEMA 0FFSITE EP APPL.

FEMA FEMA FINDING. POTENTIAL DELAY 3/ START OF COMMISSION FINDING DELAY 7/

CONST.

REGION FACILITY FINDING 1/

NEEDED 2/

(MONTHS)

HEARING 4/ 8/

DECISION 8/

NEEDED 6/ (MONTHS)

COMPL'.

l III. Three Mile C

C 0

C Island 9/

C NA NA V

LaSalle C*

C*

i O

Mone 02/82 09/30/81 NA 02/82 IV Grand Gulf (03/01/G2)*

11/15/81 0,12/

0 None 02/82 12/01/81 NA ~

03/82*

IX Diablo Canyon 1 C

C*

05/82 11/01/81 0

03/81

(

i IX Diablo Canyon 2 C

C*

O C*

05/82 04/01/82 0

07/82 IV Summer 1 C

C 0

C*

05/82 C

0 02/82 -

IV Watts Bar 1 07/01/82 07/01/82 0

None 07/82*

07/01/82 NA 08/82 IX San Onofre 2-E C

O C

03/82 C

0 01/82*

III Susquehanna 1 (03/~,,M)* Jo/ 10/01/81 0

.C 05/82 01/01/82 0

07/82*

i X

WNP-2 11/01/82 11/01/82 0

None 07/82 11/01/82 NA 12/82 l

IV,V Zimer 1 C*

C*

O C*

07/82-04/01/82 0

07/82 i

g V

Fe m i 2 03/15/82*

01/01/82 11 2*

03/82 09/82 08/01/82 0

11/82 I

II Shoreham 1 04/01/82*

12/01/81 5*

03/82 09/82 06/01/82 0

09/82 VII Callaway 1 02/15/82*

01/01/82 25 05/82* 15/

10/82 07/01/82 0

06/83 VI Comanche Peak 1 07/01/82 11/01/81 3

-13/

C*

10/82 03/01/82 0

06/83 IV St. Lucie 2 04/01/82 04/01/82 0

None 10/82 07/01/82 0

10/82 l

IX Palo Verde 1 03/15/82 12/31/81 3

05/82 11/82 08/01/82 0

11/82 i

VI Waterfoni 3 02/15/82*

10/01/81 0 14/

03/82 11/82 07/01/82

'O 10/82 V

Clinton 1 05/18/82 03/28/82*

2*~~

08/82*

01/83 10/01/82 0

01/83 l

VII Wolf Creek 1 05/30/82 05/30/82 0

10/82 04/83 01/01/83 0

12/83 i

V Byron 1 07/22/82 03/30/82 4

08/82 04/83 01/01/83 0

04/83 V

Perry 1 09/01/82 06/30/82 2

11/82 05/83 02/01/83 0

05/83 I

V Midland 2 07/30/82 06/30/82 1

11/82 07/83

~05/01/83 0

08/83 04/01/83 0

07/83 IV-Catawba 1 09/30/82 09/30/82 0

02/83 08/83 VI River Bend 1 11/29/82 11/29/82 0

04/83 10/83 07/01/83-0 04/85 l

I Seabrook 1 10/30/82 10/30/82 0-03/83 11/83 08/01/83 0

11/83 l

l VI South Texas 1 08/01/83 08/01/83 0

01/84 07/84 04/01/84 0

07/84

(

TOTAL POTENTIAL 0FFSITE _-

EMERGENCY PLANNING. DELAY 21*16/

~-

0 17/

i

C' hang's from previous'ewport l

6 1

Table 1 January 29, 1982 l

1/ The FEMA Findings provided on the. estimated dates indli:ated are generally based on a detennination of the adequacy of plans. Licenses will be appropriately conditioned in those cases where FEMA has not approved the offsite preparedness for a particular site. Dates in parentheses are for supplemental infomation to FEMA Findings previously provided.

1 2f Generally 5 months prior to a hearing except in those cases where hearings are scheduled in the near term and based on discussions with the ASLB Panel.

Dates in parentheses are for supplemental FEMA Findings.

In cases dere there is no hearing, the daies are based on the applicants Construction Completion Date.

The delay is determined as the difference between FEMA FINDING NEEDED and ESTIMATED FEMA FINDING and is 3]

in addition to any delays estimated in the report to the House Appropriations Subcomuntttee on Energy and

[

Water Development.

i y In hearings.dere emergency preparedness is contested, testimony from FEMA is needed approximately 45 days prior to Start of Hearing.

y Proposed legislation would allow the Commission to issue an interim 0L prior to the 'ASLB rendering a decision providing that no significant safety items are unresolved.

6] Generally 3 months prior to the Construction Completion Date except in those cases where construction completion is scheduled in the Near Tem. Dates in parentheses are for Supplemental FEMA Findings.

ff The delay is detemined as the difference between the adjacent FEMA FINDING NEEDED col'umn and l

ESTIMATED FEMA FINDING column.

I 8] Dates are consistent with those reported to the House. Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development. The dates do not account for potential added impacts resulting from Offsite EP Finding Delays.

,9] THI is not an OL case. Evaluation of preparedness adequacy required for restart proceedings.

10/ FEMA provided conclusions on contentions at'Susquehanna ASLB hearing.

Boani has closed record.

i Interim FEMA finding on local plans furnished.

{

i

2 it 2

L

?

l Table 1 January 29, 1982 i

i IJ/ Dates are different from SSER dates for other subjects based on discussions trith the ASLB Panel.

(

J2/ Delay of Commission Decision Date but not of Fuel Load Date.

J3/ Potentia'l impact on Commission Decision, but not on Fuel L oad Date.

}

J4/ ASLB Panel indicates that the schedule for the FEMA Finding will not cause a delay in the hearing.

15/ Hearing completed except for emergency preparedness issues.

16/ Commissioner Bradford notes that the applicants' projected dates for completion of construction and fuel l

loading have generally proven unreliable.

In addition, he does not agree with the assumption that a full 5 months is required between receipt of the FEMA findings and the commencement of 9L heaiings. Consequently l

these estimates do not provide a reliable basis for major legislative changes in the Commission's licensjng process.- he pitfalls inherent in relying on these figures are amply illustrated by the fact that appro.cfmately l

100 " delay sonths" projected by the House Appropriations Subconnittee on Energy and. Water Development on the i

basis of similar figures have now dwindled to less,than 2, and are still declining.

l 17/ Cosmissioner Ahearne believes the table should also reflect the potential reduction in delay from a proposed rule which was issued by the Commission in December 1981 (46 FR 61132).

1his proposed rule would allow issuance i

of fuel loading and low power licenses (up to 5 percent of rated power) without FEMA findings and without deter-l minations concerning adequacy of off-site emergency preparedness.

This should decrease the potential added delay due to off-site emergency preparedness without the necessity for legislation.

~

l l

I i

i lc O

Tablo 2 January 29, 198,2 STATUS OF ONSITE EMERGENCY PLANNING OPERATING LICENSE REVIEWS STATES WITHIN ONSITE FULLSCALE C0fiMISSION CONSTRUCTION FACILITY 10 MILE EPZ APPRAISAL 1/

EXERCISE 2/

DECISION 3/

C0ftPLETED 3/

NA Three Mile Island 4/

PA C

06/02/81C LaSalle IL C

12/08/80C 02/82 02/82 Grand Gulf MS, LA C* 5/

11/03/81C 02/82 03/82*

Diabic Canyon 1 CA 12/07/8TC*

08/19/81C 05/82 03/81 Diablo Canyon 2 CA 12/07/81C*

08/19/81C 05/82

t)7/82 Summer 1 SC C

05/01/81C 05/82 02/82 Watts Bar TN 07/82*

08/82 07/82*

08/82 San Onofre 2 CA C

05/13/81C 03/82 01/82*

Susquehanna PA 04/82*

03/17/82 05/82 07/82*

WMP-2 WA

' Not Scheduled Not Scheduled 07/82 12/82 Zimmer 1 OH, KY Not Scheduled 11/18/81C 07/82 07/82 Fermi 2 MI Not Scheduled 02/01/82 09/82 11/82 Shoreham l' NY Not Scheduled 06/16/82 09/82 09/82 Callaway 1 H0 Not Scheduled Hot Scheduled 10/82 06/83 Comanche Peak 1 TX Not Scheduled Hot Scheduled 10/82 06/83 St. Lucie 2 FL Not Scheduled 02/11/82 10/82 10/82 Palo Verde 1 AZ Not Scheduled Not Scheduled 11/82 11/82

~

Waterford 3 LA Not Scheduled Hot Scheduled 11/82 10/82 Clinton 1 IL Not Scheduled Hot Scheduled 01/83 01/83 Woif Creek 1 KS Not Scheduled Not Scheduled 04/83 12/83 Byron 1 IL Not Scheduled Not Scheduled 04/83 04/83 Perry 1 OH Not Scheduled Not Scheduled 05/83 05/83 Midland 2 MI 12/82*

Not Scheduled 07/83 07/83 Catawba 1 SC, NC Not Scheduled Hot Scheduled 08/83 08/83 River Bend 1 LA Not Scheduled Not Scheduled 10/83 04/85 Seabrook 1 NH, MA Not Scheduled Not Scheduled 11/83 11/83 South Texas 1 TX Not Scheduled Not Scheduled 07/84 07/84

Change from previous report

t

' January 29, 1982 Table 2 If. Start date for two week onsite Emergency Preparedness Appraisal.

y Full scale exercise of applicant,' State and supporting local governmen't to demonstrate? preparedness.

3f Dates are consistent with those reported to the House' Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy' and

~

Water Development.

4] TMI is not an NTOL.

Evaluation of preparedness adequacy required for restart proceedings.

Sj Additional onsite appraisal effort required.

l 1

t 9

9 0

0 e

9 2

Table 3 January 29, 1982

~

STATUS OF EMERGENCY PLANNING FOR OPERATING REACTORS 1

2 3

4 5

6 EMERGENCY PLAN INITIAL LAST STAFF SCHEDULED

. SCHEDULED REPORT DATE FOR SITE SimHITTAL DATE -

SITE VISIT CDMMENT DATE APPRAISAL.'DATE COMPLTTIOrt DATE TfMA FINDING 1/

Arkansas 02/06/81 11/08/79 03/81 EX 08/03/81C 01/29/82C*

01/27/82C*

i Rev 07/01/81 B; aver Valley 01/07/81

~10/03/79 11/80 Qs 10/65/81C-02/12/82*

04/01/82*

Rev 11/16/81 Big Rock Point 01/06/81 09/19/79 09/19/79 SV-11/30/81C 01/28/82C*

. 03/,05/8? -

Browns Ferry 01/14/81 05/24/80 05/24/80 SV 07/13/81C-11/06/81C 02/15/82 Rev 03/20/81 Brunswick 01/06/81 03/25/80

, 08/04/81 Qs 10/13/81C 01/11/82C*

02/01/82 Rev 03/30/81 Calvert C11ffs 01/06/81 02/27/80 10/80 Qs-10/05/81C

.(13/31/82*

03/01/82 Rev 08/27/81 Cook 01/30/81 09/20/79 10/15/81 P 03'/15/82 04/82 03/01/82*

11/26/79 11/26/79 SV 06/15/81C

.10/15/81C 04/01/82,

. Cooper 01/14/81 Rev 04/01/81 Crystal River 12/31/80 01/30/80 01/30/80 SV 08/17/81C 12/21/81C*

04/01/82 i

Rev 10/28/81*

Davis Besse 01/08/81 02/20/80

, 02/20/80 SV 02/08/82 03/82 03/01/82*

Dresden 01/08/81 11/02/79 12/14/81 P 11/02/81C 12/14/81C 04/01/82 Duane Arnold 01/12/81 04/14/80 11/12/81 P 09/08/81C 11/12/81C.

04/01/82 Rev 03/17/81 Farley 10/28/80 03/24/80 03/06/81 SER 09/21/81C 11/13/81C* -

03/11/81C Rev 04/07/81 Fitzpatrick 01/08/81 03/13/80 03/13/80 SV 02/16/82 04/82 10/23/81C Rev 04/10/81 I

Fort Calhoun 01/08/81 11/29/79 07/22/81 EX~

12/07/81C 03/19/82*

03/01/82 Rev 10/15/81 1

,..,._-._____.-__,,.._____._.___,-.__--.--__________.1_._-__---..---____-.

w

~

January 29, 1982 Tabla 3 1

2 3

4 5

6 EMERGENCY PLAN INITIAL LAST STAFF SCllEDULED SCHEDULED REPORT '

DATE FOR l

SITE SUBMITTAL DATE SITE VISIT COMMENT DATE APPRAISAL DATE COMPLETION DATE FEHA FINDING If/

Fert St. Vrain 03/20/81 05/24/80 08/12/81 EX 01/04/82C*

02/15/82 01/29/82C*

t Ginna 04/01/81 03/10/80 03/10/80 SV '

11/02/81C 02/26/82*

02/22/82 Haddam Neck 02/20/81 03/31/80 04/14/80 Qs 11/09/81C 04/82*

04/01/82 l

(ConnYankee).

Hatch 01/02/81 04/24/80 04/24/80 SV, 12/07/81C 02/12/82*

05/05/81C Indian Point 2 01/14/81 09/17/79 08/21/81 P 05/11/81C 08/24/81C 04/01)82 2&3 3 01/06/81 09/17/79 11/19/81 P 05/11/81C 11/19/81C 04/01/82 Kewaunee 01/12/81-04/21/80 10/29/81 P 06/08/81C -

10/29/81C 03/01/82

~

Rev 12/01/81 Lacrosse 04/02/81 11/01/79 10/29/81 P 07/13/81C 10/29/81C 04/01/82 Haine Yankee 01/06/81 04/20/n0

>05/13/no Os

.09/On/ nit

.07/17/n7*

01/?q/n7c*

Rev 04/15/81 McGuire 01/19/81 06/16/80 04/81 SER 03/01/82*

04/23/82 06/04/81C Rev 11/16/81*

Millstone 02/20/81 03/24/80

,04/15/80 Qs 01/04/82C*

04/82*

04/01/82*

Monticello 02/20/81 02/05/80 02/05/80 SV 03/15/82 04/23/82 03/23/82 Nine Mile Point 01/06/81 03/13/80 03/13/80 SV 08/17/81C 02/17/82*

10/20/81C

~

North Anna on/06/no 10/In/79 10/In/79 SV 07/16/n?

04/n?

nn/19/nnc Octnee 01/14/81 02/20/80 02/20/80 SV 08/24/81C 12/31/81C*

04/01/82 Rev 12/31/81*

Oyster Creek 01/13/81 04/07/80 04/07/80 SV 01/04/82C*

02/22/82 04/01/82 CChange from previous report 2

~

Table 3 January 29, 1982 I

2 3

4 5

6 EHERGENCY PLAN INITIAL LAST STAFF SCHEDULED SCHEDULED REPORT DATE FOR SITE SUBMITTAL DATE SITE VISIT COMt YNT DATE APPPAISAL DATE COMPLETION DATE FEMA FIN 0lHG 1/

. Palisades

?!/19/81 01/16/80 12/L3/81'P*

09/21/81C 12/03/01C 09/18/81C Peach Bottom 01/08/81 05/05/80 05/05/80 SV 12/07/81C 02/08/E2 05/29/82 Rev 11/25/81 Pilgrt 01/08/81 09/28/79

09/28/79 SV 07/13/81C 03/19/82*

04/01/82 Point Beach 01/19/81 05/05/80

>05/05/80 SV 01/04/82C*

02/16/82 03/15/82 Final 03/31/81 Prairie Island 02/13/81 02/04/80 11/03/80 Qs 11/02/81C 12/17/81C 03/01/82*

Quad Cities 01/08/81 10/30/79

, 05/20/81 EX 01/18/82C*

02/22/82 03/01/82 Rancho Seco 12/02/80 03/13/80 03/13/80 SV 06/22/81C 11/05/81C 04/01/82

, Rev 04/16/81 Rrbinson 01/06/81 04/24/80 03/81 EX 01/25/82*

04/82 12/29/81C Salem 09/05/80 10/11/79 05/19/81 P 03/23/81C 05/19/81C 04/24/81C Rev 01/06/81 San Onofre 01/06/81 09/28/79 05/13/81 EX 10/26/81C 02/19/82*

06/11/81C Final 02/04/81 S:quoyah 01/09/81 10/16/79 08/20/81 P 05/04/81C 08/20/81C 08/07/80C Rev 04/16/81 St. Lucie 01/08/81 11/08/79 12/11/81 P 06/08/81C 12/11/81C 03/15/32 Rev 10/26/81*

Surry 01/06/81 03/17/80 11/02/80 Qs 03/15/82 04/82 03/01/82 Rev 04/16/81 Three Nile Island 07/13/81C 02/15/82*

09/18/81C Unit 1 Rev 01/09/81 09/27/79

< 06/02/81 EX Unit 2 01/14/81 09/27/79 09/81 Os' 07/13/81C 02/15/82*

09/18/81C 1

Change from previous report 3

~

January 29, 1982 Tablo 3 I

2 3

4 5

6-EMERGENCY PLAN INITIAL LAST STAFF SCHEDULED SCHEDULE 0 REPORT DATE FOR

. SITE SU8MITTAL DATE SITE VISIT COMMENT DATE APPRAISAL DATE COMPLETION DATE FEMA FINDING 1/

03/82 03/01/82 Trojan 12/31/80 10/24/79 12/02/80 SER 02/22/82*

03/81 EX Tcrkay Point 01/08/81 02/25/80 02/07/81 Os 10/26/81C 02/03/82 04/01/82*

Varmont Yankee 01/19/81 02/19/80 02/80 Qs 03/15/82 04/82 04/01/82 Yankee Rowe 01/19/81 02/12/80 02/80 Qs 12/07/81C 04/16/82*

04/01/02 Final 04/16/81 Zien 01/08/81 11/01/79 08/26/81 P 06/29/81C 08/26/81C 04/01/82 KEY:

REV Revised Emergency Plan SER Safety, Evaluation Report

. SSER Supplement to SER Os Questions on plan sent to licensee EX Exercise SV Site Visit by EP Review Team C

Completed P

Emergency Plan Evaluation sent to licensee with deficiencies noted

~~1/ These dates are based on FEMA reviewing a preliminary plan and evaluating an exercise for the site.

A written exercise evaluation report will be submitted'after the exercise.

(Change from previous report t

e 0

e o

e 4

Table 4 January 29, 1982

.NRC STAFF POSITIONS ASSIGNED TO REVIEW ONSITE DiERGENCY PLANS FOR POWER REACTORS AT REGIONAL AND HEADQUARTERS LOCATIONS PSP

TOTAL **

Headquarters 17 25 Region I 8

10.5

~

Region II 5

9

~

Region III 4

7 Region IV 1

1.5 Region V l

2.5 TOTALS 37 55.5

Professional Staff Positions

- Includes Supervisory and Clerical Support l

i 4

9 6

a O

e 4

9

e Part II Index of Material Supplied by FEMA Table I

Summary of pertinent plans and principal milestones (Response to questions 1.a, b, c, d, e, and 3.a, b, c, d, e and f).

Table II Status of effort to obtain plans in support of plants t

licensed to operate.

(Response to question 1.f.)

Table III Cause of delays and measures that can be and are being taken to reduce delays in: receipt of plans.which are impacting the licensing process.

(Response to question 3.g.)

Table IV Summary of FEMA staff effort assigned to the REP activity.

(Response to question 4.)

Table V

Instances of Federal agencies providing less than full support to RAC reviews of plans and prepbredness.

(Response to question 1.)

s Table VI Instances of State and local government reluctance to submit plans.

(Response'to question 6.)

Table VII Instances of State and local governments making plans contingent on financial commitments of the utility.

(Response to question 7.)

O e

4 o

e 4

O O

6 PART'll TABLE I SUNNARY OF'PERTlHENT; PLANS,

AND PRINCIPAL HELESTONES (CONORESS REPORT)

SECT I ON-PAGE DESCRIPTION OF PRINCIPAL DATA FIELDS 1

STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL 2

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR CURRENTLV 19 OPERATING HUCLEAR POWER PLANTS STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR NUCLEAR 29-

~

POWER PLANTS NOT YET LICENSED STATUS OF STATE PLANS 4lSTED IN ORDER 38 OF PROJECTED PLANT LICENblHG DATE a AFTER THE PLAN IDENTIFICATION INDICATES THE' LEAD STATE.

, ~

6. INDICATES THAT SITE INPACTS HULTIPLE STATES IN ID HILE;EPZ.

INDICATES THAT SITE INPACTS THE STATE ONLY IN 50 MILE EPZ.-

(UCl INDICATES A SITE WITH FIRST UNIT UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

~ '

tul INDICATE: A UNIT UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON AN OPERATING SITE. '

(PL1 INDICATES A SITE WITH -FIRST UNIT STILL. PLANNED.

~

s AFTER ANY DATE INDICATES IT WAS PROJECTED BUT WAS NdT SATISFIED,.

~~ '

' ~~

- AFTER ANY DATE IHolCATES THAT IT IS DUE WITHIN 30 DAhS.

P AFTER FINAL FINDlHG INDICATES AN ARBITRARY I NONTH PROJECTION FRON

READY FOR NEADOUARTERS*.

ANY DATE SUCH AS S/ O/82 INDICATES A SPECIFIO DAY HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED.

JAN 1982

L

=

~

DESCRIPTION OF PRINCIPAL DATA FIELDS PAGE I FORMAL SUBMISSION refers to the date of the official submission b'y the governor, or his designated representative, es defined in 44 CFR 350.7 (proposed).

Preliminary drafts may already hevo been provided for review on en informal basis.

JOINT EXERCISE refers to the date of an exercise, es defined in 44 CFR 355.9 (proposod), in which both the utt18ty and the governments participate end in which most of the mejor elements in the plan are dxercised.

Where this date is et least a year later then the date of the formal submission and/or public moetInc date. -

It is the date of the second annual exercise of the plans.

PUBLIC MEETING refers to the date of a pre-entwunced meeting held in the vecinity of the p'lant, as discussed-In CFR 350.10.

The meeting is desloned to inform the populace about the plans for emerooncy response end is normally conducted by the State.

READY FOR HEADQUARTERS es the date on which the FEMA Regional Director completes his evaluation (see 44..CFR 350.11) of State and local plans and preparedness around the site and forwards it to FEMA Headquerters for review.

NRC REQUESTED DATE la the date by which the NRC requires'from FEMA olther a final finding and dererminetton If evellable, or if not eyeliable, en interim status report.

These dates are updated in negotiations between NRC and FEMA.

INTERIM FINDING la the date on'which FEMA has or Intends to provide a persial report to NRC.

Inthecoseofoff-siteplansrotatingtoaplant.I'icensed'tooperate.thestatuswillbereportej

=

(a) exercise.

primeraly on the results of a joint (b)

In the' case of off-site plans rotating to a plant not.yet licensed to operate, the finding wl.ll' t>e limited to the RAC review of the latest State end local off-site plans.or a status. report where plans are not evallable.

FINAL FINDlHG la the date on which FEMA has provided or Intends to provide s' formal finding and determinetton in accordance with 44 CFR 350.12 (proposed).

Lock of either a final or Interim findino dato for e Stato plan followed by a *** will not deley a FEMA formel findInc.

The

'e' indicates that the only planning elements required are are those related to the inoestion pathway.

While this will be discussed in the final finding, it would not preclude FEMA from making a final finding.

HEARING DATE ond LICENSE DATE reflect current Information belno furnished by HRC in their monthly report to Representative Tom Bevill, Chelemen, House Appropriations Subconmittee on Energy and Water Development.

9 e

e

s e

e 8

STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NU' LEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 2 C

NRC HEARING LICENSE FORMAL. JOINT' PUBLIC.

READY FOR REOUESTED 'INTERIN FINAL CTATE * - PLAN IDENTIFICATION ^

SUBNISSION EXERCISE NEETING HEADOTRS.

DATE FINDING. FIN 0lMG DATE DATE TX STATE PLAN FOR ALLENS CRK (PL) s 3/ O/82-9/ O/82 TM AUSTIN CO PLAN FOR ALLENS CREEK 1

I Pt3 TX COLORADO 'C6 PLAN FOR ALLENS CREEK

'[-.

g pg,3

'. TX FORT. BOND CO. PLAN'FOR' alt. ENS' CREEK

.t.

-(PL)-.

e 8,

'TX WALLEf( CO PLAN FOR ALLENS CREEK l

s.

(PL)-

y TX WHARTON CO PLAN FOR ALLENS CREEK (PL)*

1 AR STATE PLAN FOR ARKANSAS a

. 8/ 3/81.

3/25/81: 3/20/88 8/28/81 4/ I/82 -

1/27/82 AR. JOHNSON CO PLAN FOR ARKANSAS, 8/ 3/81

.3/25/81..3/20/81

,8/28/81, 1/27/82

~

AR POPE CO PLAN FOR ARKANSAS-8/ 3/88 3/25/81c 3/18/81 8/28/81 1/27/82 AR LOGAN CO PLAN FOR ARKANSAS' 8/ 3/81 3/25/81, 3/17/81 ?8/28/81' 1/27/82 AR YELL CO PLAN FOR ARKANSAS 8/ 3/83- *3/25/81.

3/19/81 8/28/81 I/27/82

^7/ O/82 4/ 1/82. 4/.1/82 SI O/82P IA '8 TATE PLAN FOR DUANE ARNOLD a 4/'O/82.*l'O/F8/81?.31/12/81 _

.l-IA LINN CO PLAN FON'DUANE. ARNOLD 4/.O/82 10/28/81.:11/12/81

.7/ O/82.

.lA.,BENTON.CO PLAN FOR DUANE ARNOLD 4/ O/82 (10/28/81. Jl/12/81 7/ O/82 l,

OH ' STATE-PLAN FOR BEAVER VAL (U) +

5/28/82 2/17/8'2 3/ O/82-4/15/82 4/.1/82 4/ l/82 5/15/82P -

~

'OH -COLUMBIANA CO PLAN FOR BEAVER 5/28/82 2/17/82 3/ O/82-4/15/82 t

.~;-

VALLEY (US-

~

PA STATE PLAN FOR BEAVER. VAL s e (U).

3/15/82. 2/17/8Ea,3/15/82-4/15/02, 4/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 5/15/02P

)

. PA., BEAVER Co PLAN FOR B8EAVER VALLEY 3/15/82-2/17/82 3/15/82, 4/15/82 l

i IU)

+..

.2/28/82-2/l7/82e ~1/30/82e 4/15/82 4/.1/82 4/ 1/82 5/15/82P W STATE PLAN FOR BEAVER VAL (U) i W HANCOCK CO PLAN FOR BEAVER VALLEY 2/28/82

2/17/82: 1/30/82s 4/15/02 l

l (u)

~i l

j'

'AL STATE. PLAN FOR BELLEFONTE (UC) e 8/ O/84 l

AL JACKSON CO PLAN FOR BELLEFONTE (UC)

I l

GA ' STATE PLAN FOR BELIEFONTE (UC) e l

.. TN STATE PLAN FOR BELLEFONTE,(UC).e NI. STATE PLAN FOR SIG ROCK.PolHT s

'2/28/81*

3/23/82 12/15/80 4/>t/82

.4/.1/82 3/ 5/82-5/ 1/82P 10/ O/Ste NI CHARLEvolX CO PLAN-FOR BIG ROCK 2/28/81 '3/23/82 12/15/80; 4/ I/82 POINT l

,. MI ENNET CO PLAN FOR BIG ROCK POINT 2/28/81' 3/23/82 12/15/80 4/ 1/82 l

000 STATE PLA'N'FOR BLACK FOX (PL).s S/ O/82 2/ O/83

.OK ROGERS CO PLAN FOR BLACK FOX (PL)

OK NAYES CO PLAN FOR BLACK FOX (PL)

I I

1

?

STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALI. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 3 NRC FORNAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIN FINAL HEARING LICENSE OTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADOTRS.

DATK+

FINDING FINDING DATE DATE OK WAOONER CO PLAN FOR BLACK FOX (Pl.)

i i

IL STATE PLAN FOR BRAIDWOOO (UC) e 10/ O/84 4/ O/85 IL GRUNDY CO PLAN FOR BRAIDWOOO (UC)

IL WILL CO PLAN FOR BRAIDWOOD (UCI IN STATE PLAN FOR BRAIDWOOD (UC) e l

AL STATE PLAN FOR BROWNS FERRY a ll/ 1/80 9/ O/82 9/ 8/81 3/ 1/82-4/ t/82 2/15/82 4/ t/82P

{

AL-LINESTONE CO PLAN FOR BROWNS FERRY ll/ t/80 9/ O/82 9/ 8/81 3/ I/82-AL LAWRENCE CO Pt.AN FOR BROWNS FERRY ll/ l/80 9/ O/82 9/ 8/81 3/,1/82-

[

AL MORGAN CO PLAN FOR BROWNS FERRY 11/ 1/80 9/ O/82 9/ 8/81 3/t1/82-i AL LAUDERDALE CO PLAN FOR BROWNS FERRY 11/ I/80 9/ O/82 9/ 8/81 3/ 1/82-l TN STATE PLAN FOR BROWNS FERRY e g

,i MC STATE PLAN FOR BRUNSWICK s 7/15/81 8/ O/82 8/20/89 11/13/81 4/ 1/82 2/ t/82 4/ 1/82 NC BRUNSWICK CO PLAN FOR BRUNSWICK 7/15/81 8/ O/82 8/20/81 11/13/81 l

NC NEW HANOVER CO PLAN FOR BRUNSWICK

- 7/15/81 8/ O/82 8/20/81 11/13/81 l

g l

SC STATE PLAN FOR BRUNSWICK e l

t l

EL STATE PLAN FOR BYRON (UC) e 1/15/83 8/ O/82 8/ O/82 t/31/83 3/30/82 7/22/82 2/31/83P 8/ O/82 4/ O/83 l

IL OGLE CO PLAN FOR BYRON (UC) 1/15/83 8/ O/82 8/ O/82 1/31/83 IL WINNESAOO CO PLAN FOR BYROM (UC) 1/15/83 8/ O/82 8/ O/82 1/31/83 WI STATE PLAN FOR BYRON (UC) e j -

MS STATE PLAN FOR CALLAWAY (UC) s 9/ O/82 12/ O/82 8/ O/82 2/ O/83 1/ I/82 2/15/82s 3/ O/83P 5/ O/82 10/ O/82 MS CALLAWAY CO PLAN FOR CALLAWAY (UC) 9/ O/82 12/ O/82 8/ O/82 2/ O/83 MS MONTOOMERY CO PLAN FOR CALLAWAY 9/ O/82 12/ O/82 8/ O/82 2/ O/83 (UC) l' MO GASCONADE CO PLAN FOR CALLAWAY (UC) 9/ O/82 12/.0/82 8/ O/82 2/ O/83 l

MO OSAGE CO PLAN FOR CALLAWAY (UC) 9/ O/82 12/ O/82 8/ O/82 2/ O/83 I

3 i

DC STATE PLAN FOR CALVERT CLIFFS e MD STATE PLAN FOR CALVERT CLIFFS e 4/ t/82 11/17/81 3/15/82-5/ I/82 4/ 1/82 3/ 1/82-8/ t/82P MD CALVERT CO PLAN FOR CALVERT CLIFFS 4/ l/82 11/17/81 3/15/82-5/ 1/82 MD ST MARYS CO Pt.AN FOR CALVERT Cl.lFFS 4/ 1/82 11/17/81 3/15/82-5/ 1/82 1'

MD DORCHESTER CO PLAN FOR CALVERT 4/ 1/82 11/17/81 3/15/82-5/ t/82 1,

I' CLIFFS VA STATE PLAN FOR CALVERT CLIFFS e

~

l i'

l NC STATE PLAN FOR CATAWBA (UC) +

9/ O/82 9/ O/82

- 9/30/82 9/30/82 2/ O/83 8/ O/83 NC MECKLEDSERO CO PLAN FOR CATAWBA 9/ O/82 9/ O/82 g'

(UC) 9/ O/82 9/ O/92 i

NC OASTON'CO PLAN FOR CATAWBA (UC)

+

SC STATE PLAN FOR CATAWBA (UC) a +

9/ O/82 9/ U/82 9/30/02 9/30/82 2/ O/83 8/ O/83 i

6 e

STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 4

'NRC FORMAL' JOINT PUBLIC.

READY FOR REQUESTED. INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE CTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADQTRS.

DATE FINDING FINDING DATE DATE SC YORK CO PLAN FOR CATAWBA (UC) 9/ P/82 9/ O/82

,SC LANCASTER CO PLAN FOR CATAWBA (UC) 9/ ts/82 9/ O/82 NC'. STATE PLAN FOR CHEROKEE (UC) e

,CC. STATE PLAN FOR CKEROKEE (UC) e SC CHEROKEE CO PLAN FOR CHEROKEE (UCI J

SC YORK CO PLAN FOR CHEROKEE (UC) t NC STATE PLAN FOR CLINCH RIVR (PL) 8' TN. 3 TATE PLAN FOR CLINCH RIVR (PL) e s

TN ROANE CO PLAN FOR CLINCH RIVER (PL)

.i TN LOUDON CO PLAN FOR CLINCH RIVER i

(PL)

TN' KNOX CO PLAN FOR CLINCH RIVER (PL)

i' 'TN ANDERSON CO PLAN FOR CLINCH RIVER

.(PL).

4 I

IL STATE PLAN FOR CLINTON (UC) e

'l/ O/83 10/ 0/82.'10/ 0/82 3/ O/83 3/28/82 B/18/82 4/ O/83P 8/ O/82 1/ 0/83 IL DEWITT CO PLAN FOR CLINTON (UCf

' 1/ O/83 10/ O/82. 10/'0/82 3/ O/83 EL - MACON CO PLAN FOR CLINTod (UC)

~1/ 0/83 10/ 0/82 10/ 0/82 3/ O/83

~ 'I IL NCLEAN CO PLAN FOR CLINTON -(UC) -

'l/ 0/83 10/ O/82 '10/ O/82. ' 3/ 0/83 i

IL,PIATT CO PLAN FOR CLINTON (UC)

' l/ O/83 ;,10/ O/82 10/ O/82 3/ O/83

-i.

..'I' TX STATE PLAN FOR COMANCHE P.

(UC) s 4/ O/82 1/ O/83 7/'0/82 3/ O/83 7/ I/82 4/ O/83P 12/ 2/81 10/ O/82

('

TX HOOO CO PLAN FOR COMANCHE PEAK (UC)"

4/ O/82 1/ O/83

'7/.6/82' 3/.0/83-TM SOMERVELL CO PLAN FOR COMANCHE 4/ O/82 1/ 0/83' 7/ 0/82 3/ O/83-PEAK (UCI

~

'~

t

' CT. STATE PLAN.FOR COffN.'YAh0KEE s.

.'.-9/'4/81 2/ 8/82*' 4/ 0/82 4/ O/82 4/ 1/82 4'/ 1/82 5/ 0/82P I

CT CHESTER Pl.AN FOR CONNECTICUT YAf8(EE 9/ 4/81 2/ 8/82. 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 CT COLCHESTER PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT' 9/ 4/81 2/ 8/82e ' 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE CT. DEEP RIVER PLAN FOR (;ONNECTICUT:

9/ 4/81.

2/ 8/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 i

k*ANKEE 1

CT DURHAM PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YANKEE 9/ 4/81 e 2/ 8/82s 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 CT EAST HADDAM PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 8/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YAte(EE

4. *. CT EAST HAMPTON PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 8/82 4/ 0/02 ' 4/ 0/82 i

YANKEE

,j'..CT HADOAM PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YANKEE 9/ 4/81.

.2/ 8/82s, 4/.0/82 4/ 0/82 9/ 4/81 2/ 8/828-4/ 0/82'

~4/ O/82 CT KILLINGWORTH PLAN FOtt CONNECTICUT ' ~

YAte(EE.

'9/ 4/81' 2/ 8/82*

J/ O/82 4/ O/82 l.

67'HARLBOROuoH' PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT.

5

. YANKEE i

. j' CT. NIDDLETOWN PLAN FOR.CONNECTIt:UT. **

2/,8/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/42 9/.4/,81 g

YANKEE'.-

.1 J

l 5

~.

2 STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 5 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REOUESTED.INTERIN FINAL NEARING LICENSE CTATE PLAN IDENTIFICA7 ION SUBNISSION EMERCISE NEETING HEADQTRS.

DAT1!'

FINDING FINOING DATE DATE CT PORTLAND PLAN "OR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE CT HEBRON PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YAM EE 9/ 4/81 2/ 8/82: 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 CT ESSEX PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YANKEE 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 CT WESTBROOK PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE i

CT CLINTON PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YANKEE 9/ 4/88 2/ 6/828 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 i

CT NADISON PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YANKEE 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/828 4/ 0/82 4/ O/82 l

CT MIDDLEFIELD PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/88 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 l

YAMEE i

CT-LYNE PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YAM EE i

CT SALEN PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YAM EE.

,9/.4/81.

2/ 8/82 4/ O/82

'4/ O/82 MA STATE PLAN FOR CONN.YA M EE e

~ 9/ 4/81-2/ 8/82a 4/ O/82 4/,O/82 NY STATE PLAN FOR CONN YAKEE e RI STATE PLAN FOR CONN YAM EE 8 4

IL STATE PLAN FOR D.C.

COOK e IN STATE PLAN FOR D.C. COOK e NI STATE PLAN FOR D.C. COOK a 2/26/81 3/30/82 12/11/80 4/30/82 4/ I/82 3/ I/82-5/30/82P O

NI BERRIEN CO PLAN FOR D. C.

COOK 2/26/01 3/30/82 12/11/80 4/30/82 j

WI STATE PLAN FOR D.C.

COOK e j

.p IA STATE PLAN FOR-COOPER STATION e i

i NO. STATE PLAN FOR COOPER STATION +

8/ O/82 3/10/82-8/ S/81 7/ O/82 4/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 8/.0/82P

}l ATCHISON CO PLAN FOR COOPER STATION 6/ 0/82 3/10/82-8/ 8/81 7/ O/82. 4/ 1/82-.4/ 1/82 8/ O/82P l'

NO per STATE PLAN FOR COOPER. STATION a

+

8/ O/82 3/10/82-8/ 8/81 7/ O/82 NEMAHA CO PLAN FOR COOPER STATION 6/ O/82 3/10/82-8/ 6/81

'7/ O/82 i

h.

RICHARDSON CO PLAN FOR COOPER i

i STATION e

I FL STATE PLAN FOR CRYSTAL RIVER s' 4/ I/82 3/30/82 3/29/82 4/ 0/02

'4/'l/82

,4/ 1/82 5/ O/82P g

FL CITRUS CO PLAN FOR CRYSTAL RIVER 4/ I/82 3/30/82 3/29/82 4/ O/82 l

FL LEVY CO PLAN FOR CRYSTAL RIVER

'4/.1/82 3/30/82 "B/29/82

'.4/, O/82 j

a NI STATE PLAN FOR DAVIS BESSE e in CH STATE PLAN FOR DAVIS BESSE a 2/25/81 9/ O/82 11/ 7/80 3/19/82-4/ 1/82 3/ I/82-4/19/82P OH I

OTTAWA CO PLAN FOR DAVIS BESSE 2/25/81 9/ O/82 11/ 7/80 3/19/82-OH LUCAS CO PLAN FOR DAVIS BESSE 2/25/81 9/ 0/82 II/ 7/80.

3/19/82-t i

I CA STATE PLAN FOR DIABLO CAN (UCl a 7/15/82 8/19/81 12/17/81 9/15/82 11/ 1/81 12/29/81.~10/15/82P'1/ O/82a 5/ O/82 I

CA SAN LUIS OBISPO PLAN FOR DIABLO 7/15/82 8/19/81 12/17/81 9/95/82' 1

i

.CANYOff (UCl IL STATE

PLAN FOIIDRESDEN a 3/31/88 9/30/88 10/30/80 2/18/42 4/ 1/82 4/ i/82 S/18/MP IL ORUNDY CO PLAN FOR DRESDEN 3/31/01 9/30/89 10/30/80 2/18/82

. j l

+ -

l

[

5 5

..n8 3

gg i

f b

b b-b 38 A

A k

hh 2

I i

W sw 3

2 ge 3

s o

s t

h h

h

'h hk g

un RRR tt t

t R

it t

t*

a-12 2

2 i

tc hhh sh 3

h 2

2 22 s3 z

Ey t

t t

t.

RR t

u u

u u i

WE 2

st A

2

.h A

k 4

AA l

0 E

E 2

33 o

Eg"g W

2 2

2-2 z

s s

g l

g

,s

.=

R

! =.

sEs ss 22:

Es 22:

\\

2

>.g 22 333 AA RRR 33 33333 22 333 3332 gig 55 555 55-555 55 n m s 555.

55 l

oo ooo ao

~~~

nu oo AAA E

of **

R***

w 3; 88 aa" 22 l

ll 33 222 22 hhh 22 3 22%

22 424 3325 l

"2 taa d

l w --

ununun

~~~

un unu 2 Rt Rtttte t**

tt

'RRett et RRt ettt E

Ee RR Ess

,sg 33 222222 sht 33 sssss 33 322 1222 g

t 2

a! Es 222 22 Es assii 22 Ess Edii ESSEE f: 22 333 32 333 sh

>>332 22 333 3A22 22222 w

t.

E-mg et

_t _t _t s s.

tt tt ssss et t.t.t 333.s.

ss

~~E eg-~~

~~.gn..t s -s E=~~

~~"Ig gigi p 5.5 C m d >. b <W;i~~~

sh

~~-.EE-t o'~~

~~58 w~~

~~.311" t! mz]*[m2 t~~

~~g wo~~

<w

~~-mw-g g5 a.~~

~~gm gr g~~

m

~~- EEe gE'ew' sn~~

~~.g Io~~

~~<8 -~~

-=

=

~~s 1155 8E"3 5'E 2'5225 EmEW m~~

~~35!~~

8 1*

~~~='E 1~~
zm m
m E
gg E5 82 E Ez" g j m.
E E
EEz E*zE m]2:si2=mp3m g
mg 8gmg 8='
EmE m2j m
m m
mg i
8
<o
-E
=5
=8 z
mz
=
88,<-
2 8228 t 82
=
5~
2m 8g 2
2 g
Wsl= E as8 E
8 8
W W WW E8 gs!
W~E*WW RW..gd"gigg gg gz WE Wo WW I
W W--
Ww-8 s
E wd5
.S g
3
.Ex.
.22gg
.5 gg ggg3g gg23 a:;
ga xx.
.x
.=
.-.o.
W
's dds diddia EEEE ik 555MW 88 kit 35EE.
EEEEE ee p. e.e.g.
ee w
d
s e
~
STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR All. MUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 7 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REGUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE CTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBNISSION EXERCISE HEETING HEADOTRS.
DATE
-FINDING FINDING DATE DATE KY STATE PLAN FOR HARTSVILI.E (UCI e I
TN STATE PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC) a 4
TN TROUSDALE CO PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC) 1 TN SMITH CO PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC)
TN MACON CO PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC) l TN WILSON CO PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC) l TN SUNNER CO PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC).
g 9A STATE PLAN FOR HATCH s S/ s/80* 10/ O/e2 10/23/01 1/13/08 5/ 5/81 l
l OA APPLING CO PLAN FOR HATCH 6/ 9/80 10/ O/42 10/23/81 1/13/03 5/ 5/88 l
SA TOOPSS CO PLAN FOR HATCH 6/ 9/80 *10/ 0/82 10/23/81 1/13/43 5/ 5/81 l
l l
GA 'JEFF DAVIS CO PLAN FOR HATCH 6/ 9/80 10/ 0/82 10/23/01.
1/13/81 5/ 5/el l
j SA TATTNALL CO PLAN FOR HATCH S/ 9/80 10/ O/82
~~10/23/SI,, 1/13/88 5/ 5/89, i~~
l DE STATE PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK (UC3 e l'
DE NEW CASTLE CO PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK (UC) +
0 DE KENT CO. PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK.(UC) +
MD STATE PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK (UC) e l
MJ. STATE PLAN FOR HOPE CREK (UCI a +
e NJ SALEM CO PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK (UCI +
e
~~ CUMBERLAND CO PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK-
~
i NJ (UCl3 PA. STATE PLAN FOR* HOPE CREEK-(UC).e
~ '
~ CT STATE PLAN FOR INDIAN POINT e g
3 NY STATE PLAN FOR IMOIAN PoltiT.s
,s/13/41 3/ 2/82-l4/ l/82 5/ 7/82 4/ 1/82 4/ t/82
-6/,7/02P NY WESTCHESTE t CO PLAff FOR.INDI AN 9/14/81, * ' 3/ 2/42= 4/ l/82 5/ 7/82
?
POINT e
NY KOCKLAND CO PLAN FOR INDIAN POINT-8/18/01 3/ 2/02-4/ 1/02. 5/ 7/82 I
NY ORANGE CO Pt.AJ.FOR INDIAN PolNT 8/18/41 3/ 2/82-4/ t/82 5/ 7/02 PA STATE PLAN FOR INDIAN PolHT e 3/ 2/42. 4/ 1/82 5/ 7/8E NY PUTNAM CO PLAN FOR INDIAN POINT 8/18/SI-
~~
CT STATE Pi.AN FOR JAMESPORT (UC).e' NY STATE PLAN FOR JAMESPORT.(UC).s NY SUFFOLK CO PLAff FOR JAMESPORT (UC)-
WI STATE PLAN FOR KEWAUNEE a 4/ 6[S'l
- 3/ ' 9/02 - 1/22/81 ~
5/20/82 ' 4/ t/42 3/ I/82-6/28/82P WI. ICEWAUNEE CO PLAN FOR KEWAUNEE
. 4/ 6/81 ~. 3/'9/82-1/22/01 5/28/82 e
W1 MANITOWOC CO PLAN FOR KEWAUNEE 4/,S/SI 3/ 9/82- -l/22/81' 5/28/82 IA STATE PLAN FOR LA CROSSE +
IA.ALLAMAKEE PLAN FOR LA. CROSSE I
~
~
5
~
e
g y
1 STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 8 NRC l
FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REOUESTE0 INTERIM-FINAL HEARIN8 LICENSE STATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SU8 MISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADOTRS.
,DATE FINDING FINDING DATE DATE MN STATE PLAN FOR LA CROSSE +
4/ I/82 10/21/81 10/22/81 5/ 3/82 4/ I/82 4/ I/82 6/ 3/82P PSI HOUSTON CO PLAN FOR LA CROSSE 4/ 1/82 10/28/81' 10/22/81 5/ 3/82 WI STATE PLAN FOR LA CROSSE e +
4/ 6/81 10/21/81 11/10/81 5/ 3/82 4/ I/82 4/ t/82 6/ 3/82P WI VERNON CO PLAN FOR LA CROSSE 4/ 6/31 10/21/88 11/10/81 5/ 3/82 1
..lL STATE PLAN FOR LASALLE (UC) a 3/31/01 4/14/82 12/ 5/80 2/10/82 11/30/81 1/26/82 3/18/82P 6/ O/02 IL LASALLE CO' PLAN FOR LASALLE (UC) 3/31/81 4/14/82 12/ 5/80 2/18/82 IL ORUNDY CO PLAN FOR-LA SALLE (UC) 3/31/81 4/14/82 12/ 5/80 2/10/82 IN STATE PLAN FOR LASALLE (UC) #
l DE STATE PLAN FOR LIMERICK IUCI e MD STATE PLAN FOR LIMERICK (UC) #
NJ STATE PLAN FOR LIMERICK IUC) e PA STATE PLAN FOR LIMERICK (UC) a 4/ 0/04 10/ O/84
.i PA MONTOOMERY CO PLAN FOR LIMERICK 3
(UC)
PA SERKS CO PLAN FOR l.IMERICK'(UC)
PA CHESTER-CO PLAN.FOR. LIMERICK (UC) l l
~
- MA STATE PLAN FOR MAINE YAt#CEE e ME STATE PLAN FOR MAINE YA>SCEE
8/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 4/ f/82 1/29/82 3/20/82-ME ARROW 81C PLAN FOR' MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81, 11/20/81 ME GEORGETOWN PLAN FOR MAINE YAte(EE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81. 11/20/81 -
ME PHIPPS8URG PLAN FOR MAINE.YAte(EE 6/18/81 9/26/81 30/17/81 11/20/81-ME WEST BATH' PLAN FOR MAlHE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81'.30/.7/81 11/20/81 ME BATH PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE.
-l.
ME BOWOOINHAM PLAN FOR MAINE YAte(EE
. 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81.'It/20/81 6/18/88 9/26/01. 10/.7/88 11/20/81 ME. WOOLWICH PLAN FOR MAINE YAfGCEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81 10/ 7/81',11/20/81-ME BRUNSWICK PLAN.FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 e
II/20/81 ME ALMA PLAN' FOR MAINE -YAt#CEE 6/18/81 9/26/81' 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 I.
'ME. BOOTtBAY. PLAN FOR* MAINE YAf#CEE-9/26/81 10/ 7/01 11/2d/81
~ 't *. ME, BOOTHBAY..HAR80R. N'N FOR MAINE 6/18/81 ~ 9/26/81 10/. 7/81 11/20/81 s/18/81 YAte(EE 1
ME' SRISTOI.' PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 8/18/89* [9/26/81 10/ 7/88 11/20/81 ME DAMARISCOTTA PLAN FOR MAINE YAf8(EE.'
8/18/81 9/26/88 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME DRESDEN PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 l
NE EDGECole PLAN FOR MAINE YAte(EE S/38/81 9/26/88 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 i
ME NEW CASTLE PLAN FOR MAINE YAte(EE
~ 6/IS/81 9/26/01 10/ 7/81 11/20/81
.]~
.ME SOUTH BRISTot. PLAN FOR MAINE YAf8(EE 6/18/81 9/26/89,-10/ 7/01 11/20/01 ME SOUTHPORT PLAN FOR MAINE YAte(EE 6/10/81 9/26/01 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME WESTPORT PLAN FOR MAINE YAfGCEE 6/IS/01 9/26/41 10/'7/81" 11/20/81 ME WisCASSET PLAN FOR MAINE YAte(EE 6/10'01 9/26/81 16/ 7/81 11/20/81
., ME I,INCOLN CO PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE ME SAGADANOC CO PLAN FOR' MAINE.YAte(EE
.e.
{
- NH STATE'Q FOR MAltiE YAte(EF. e
~ ' * -
j
.lM STATE PLAN FOR MARSLE H.
( UC ) a *' *
~
S
t I
e.(n) VNNW HANON klOJ NVid 31V18 CW I
-29/95/3 IS/P /88 10/S8/6 19/33/1 (n) id 3IIW 3NIN WOJ NV1J.OG 003MSO AN - '.
JE9/95/C 59/P /31
-39/95/3 lt/P /ll-19/98/6 19/33/1 m (n) id 3 IIW 3NIN WOJ NV Id 31VIS AN t
j E9/ 83/9 - 89/9 /4
-29/3 /C 4 9/3 8 /C-OT133 fiNOW WOI NY lJ 93 3NWOW3HS 'NW i
39/12/9 19/9 /4
-29/E /C 19/El/C OT13311NOW UOJ NY1J 031HelWM' NW JZe/IE/9 39/CE/C 39/1 />
39/83/9 19/9 /t
-29/E /C 19/31/C s.O173311NOW WOJ NYIJ 31VIS'NW
?-
i l
8 (n) 3NOISTllW WOJ NY Id 31VIS IW i
e (n) 3NOISTilW WOJ NVlJ 31VIS IN
'E9/O /P Ze/O /P -29/03/C IS/P /6 (n) 3NOIS 111W WOJ NV IJ NO10NINOIS-13 g
E9/O /P ES/O /P. -29/03/C 19/P /6 (A) 3NOISTilW WOJ NV1J MOOWSAWS 010 13 29/O /P Ze/O /P -29/03/C 19/P /6 (n) 3NOISTilW WOJ NV lJ OUVA031
'13 (n) 3NOISTilW WOJ NVid NOLOMO 13 39/O /r 29/O '/P '-39/03/C 19/P /6 E9/O /P Ze/O /P *-29/OE/C 19/P /6 (R) 3NOISTIIW WOJ NV1J 2TII A1NOW ~ 13 I
E9/O /P E9/O /P -29/03/C 19/P /6 (n) 3NOIS*llIW WOJ NW1J W31VS 13 29/O /P ' ES/O /P -29/03/C IS/P /6 (n) 3NOISTIIW WOJ NW1J 3WA 1 13 l
29/O /P 39/O /P -29/03/C 19/P /6 (n) 3NOISTilW WOJ NV lJ 3WA1010 13 i
29/O /P 30/0 /P -29/03/C 59/P /6 (n) 3NOISTIlW WOJ NV14 3WA 1 ISV3 13 l.
29/O /r 29/O /P -29/03/C 19/P /6 (n) 3NO1911tW WOJ NVid OWOJW31VM 13 -.
30/0 /P 39/O. /P.-29/03/C 59/P /6 (n) 3NOISTllW WOJ NVid NOONO l M3N 13 l
JE9/O /9 39/l /P 39/1 /P 39/O />
39/O /> -29/03/C IS/P /6 (n) s 3NOIS11IW WOJ MVlJ 31V18 13
.\\
C9/O /08.C9/O /C C9/O /C C9/O '/9 -
(On) ONYlGlW N03 NVIJ 03 MVNIOVS IW i
C9/O /01 C9/O /C C9/O /C C9/O /9 (30) ONW10lW WOJ NYIJ 03 AVG IW C9/O /08 C9/O /C C9/O /C C9/O /9 (30) ONW10lW WOJ NYlJ 03 ONY10lW IN i
CD/O /1
~~$/O /18 JCS/O /18 30/OC/1 39/OC/9 C9/O /08 C9/O /C C9/O /C C9/O /9.~~
s-(30) ONY10lW WOJ NVId 31VIS IW 8
h~
.09/P /38 39/O./38 09/C /41
~(n) # 3MInO3W WOJ NV1J 31V1B OS 19/P /9 19/OE/C (n) 3MinO3W WOJ NYId 03 V9MV1V3. ON
}
19/P /9 19/03/C 09/P /Z1 29/O /38 09/C /88 (n) 3 Min 03W WOJ NV lJ 03 T1303MI DN 1'
89/P /9 59/03/C 09/P /Z8 29/O /El 09/C /88 (n) 3 Min 03W WOJ NVId 03 NOISVG ON 19/P /9 19/03/C OS/P /38 30/0 /38 09/C /88 (O) 3 Min 03W WOJ NV1J 03 NlO3NII 'ON 19/P /9 89/OE/C 09/> /El 20/0 /38 09/C /18 (n) 3 Win 03W WOJ NV1J 03 OW3m3lM33W ON EO/O /9 IS/P /9 te/18/C.
IS/18/C le/OE/C 09/P /31 30/0 /38 09/C /18 s (n) 3 min 03W WOJ NV1J 31VAS DN-(30) 4 IllH 319WWW WOJ NVIJ 03 3lW IW1. AM (On) TllH 3 89WVW WOJ NW1J 03 WWN010 AM
+ (30) TIIH 319WWW WOJ NW1J 31VIS AM (30) T11N 319WWW WOJ NV ld 93 MWV13 NI (30) TIIH 319WWW WOJ NV1d 0311C3S NI (30)
"IllH 319WVW WOJ NV1J 03 NOSW3JJ3r Na 31VG 31VO ONIONIJ ON10NIJ
,31VG
~~SW100V3H ONI133H 3Sl3W3X3 NOISSIWen9 NOI1V3tJI1N301 NVId 31418 3SN3313 SNIWV3H 1VNid WIW31NI 03193003W WOJ AQV3M Ollend 1NIOr 1VWWOJ DUN 6 30VJ SINY Id W3MOJ WV313nN TIV WOJ SNV1d 3112-JJO JO Sn1Vis F~~
g g
g e
0 t'
L f
L e
l l
STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 10 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REOUESTED INTERIN FINAL HEARING LICENSE GTATE
- PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBNISSION EXERCISE NEETING HEADOTRS.
DATE FINDING FINDING DATE DATE i
VA STATE PLAN FOR MORTH ANNA e (U) 5/11/81 8/18/80 7/18/88 9/15/81 8/19/80 8/19/80 4/ 1/82 l
VA LOUISA CO PLAN FOR NORTH ANNA (U)
~5/11/81 8/16/80 7/18/81 9/15/81 3'
VA SPOTSYLVANIA CO PLhN FOR. NORTH
^ 5/11/81 8/16/80 7/16/81 9/15/81 ANNA (U).
~
3 VA HANOVER CO PLAN FOR MORTH ANNA (U) 5/11/81 8/18/80 7/16/81 9/15/81,
VA CAROLINE CO PLAN FOR NORTH ANNA (U) 5/11/81 8/18/80 7/18/81
'9/15/81 VA ORANGE CO PLAN FOR NORTH ANNA (U) 5/11/88 8/16/80 7/18/81 9/15/81 i
SA STATE PLAN FOR OCONEE e NC STATE PLAN FOR OCONEE e i
CC STATE PLAN FOR OCONEE a 1/15/82s 3/10/82-3/ 9/82-5/ f/82 4/ 1/82 4/ I/82 8/ 'l/82P SC OCONEE CO PLAN FOR OCONEE 1/15/82a 3/10/82-3/ 9/82-5/ l/82 SC PICKENS CO PLAN FOR OCONEE 1/15/82s 3/10/82-^ 3/ 9/82-5/ 1/82 SC ANDERSON CO PLAN FOR OCONEE' 1/15/82 3/10/82-3/ 9/82 - 5/ 1/82 l
8
. 2/ 4/82e 3/16/82-' 4/21/82 S/23/82 4/ t/82 4/ I/82 7/23/82P NJ STATE PLAN FOR OYS7ER CREEK e NJ OCEAM CO PLAN FOR OYSTER CREEK 2/ 4/82s 3/Is/82 4/28/82 8/23/82 NJ BARNEGAT LT BORO PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/82s 3/18/82-4/21/82 6/23/82 CREEK.
i NJ BARNEeAT TWNSW PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/82s 3/16/82-4/21/82 6/23/82 l
CREEK NJ BEACHWOOO BORO PLAN FOR OYSTER
'2/ 4/828 3/18/82-4/28/82 8/23/82 L
CREEK I
MJ SERKELEY TWNSW PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/82a 3/Is/82-4/21/82 6/23/82 CREEK
'- NJ DOVER TOWNSHIP PLAN
,R OYSTER 2/ 4/82s 3/18/82-4/21/82* 6/23/82
{
CREEK 2/ 4/82e' 3/18/82-4/21/82 s/23/82 MJ HARVY CEDAR BORO PLAN FOR OYSTER a
CREEK I
NJ ISLAND HEIGHTS PLAN FOR OYSTEM 2/.'4/02e 3/18/82- '4/21/82 S/23/82 CREEK
?
-l NJ LACEY TOWNSHIP PLAN FOR SYSTER 2/ 4/828 3/18/82-4/21/82 8/23/82 CREEK l
MJ L BEACH TWNSHP PLAN FOR OYSTER
'2/ 4/828 3/18/82-4/21/82 8/23/82 CREEK.
NJ OCEANGATE BORO PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/828 3/l8/82* 4/21/82 6/E3/82 l
CREEK 8
NJ OCEAN TOWNSHIP PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/82s 3/16/02-4/21/82-6/23/82 CREEK NJ PINE BEACH BORO PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/82*
3/18/82-4/21/82 8/23/p2 l
CREEK 8
MJ SEASOE HOTS DORO PLAN FOR' OYSTER 2/ 4/82e 3/16/82-4/21/82 S/23/82 CREEK l.
NJ SEASDE PARK SORO PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/82a 3/18/82= 4/21/82 8/23/82 CREEK l
NJ SHIP BOTTON SORO PLAN FOR SYSTER 2/ 4/82e 3/18/82-4/21/82 S/23/82 l'
CREEK i'
NJ STAFFORO TWNSHP PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/825 3/18/82-4/21/82 S/23/82 l
CREEK -
I i
1
A f
STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 11 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE CTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADOTRS.
~~DATIl, FINDING FINDING DATE DATE NJ SURF CITY BORO PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/.82a 3/16/82-4/21/82 6/23/82 CREEK NJ BEACH HAVEN BORO PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/82s 3/16/82-4/21/82 6/23/82 CREEK i~~
NJ MANCHSTR TWNSHP PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/82s 3/16/82-' 4/21/82 6/23/82 3
CREEK NJ SOUTH RIVER BORO PLAN FOR OYSTER 2/ 4/82s 3/16/82. 4/21/82 6/23/82 i
CREEK NY STATE PLAN F(N! OYSTER CREEK e PA STATE PLAN FOR SYSTER CREEK e IN STATE PLAN FOR PALISADES e 6
4 MI VAN BUREM CO PLAN FOR PALISADES 2/26/81 2/23/82-12/10/80 2/18/82 l
MI STATE PLAN FOR PALISADES a 2/26/81 2/23/82-12/10/80 2/18/82 9/18/81 9/18/81 4/ t/82 MI ALLEGAN CO PLAN FOR PALISADES 2/26/81 2/23/82-12/10/80 2/18/82 i
}
MI BERRIEN CO PLAN FOR PALISADES 2/26/81 2/23/02-12/10/80 2/18/82 i
f 1/15/83 9/29/82.11/15/82 3/15/03 12/31/81 3/15/82-4/15/83P 5/ O/f 2 11/ O/82 AZ STATE PLAN FOR PALO VERDE (UC) e AZ MARICOPA.CO PLAN FOR PALO VERDE 1/15/83 9/29/82' 11/15/82 3/15/83 w
(UC) 1 DE STATE PLAN FOR PEACH BOTTOM e MO STATE PLAN FOR PEACH BOTTOM +
5/22/82 6/16/82 7/ 1/82 8/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 5/29/82 9/ t/82P
{
l MD CECIL CO Pl.AN FOR PEACH BOTTOM 5/22/82 6/16/82 7/ I/82 8/ t/82 g - MD HARFORD CO PLAN FOR PEACH BOTTOM 5/22/82 6/16/82 7/ t/82 8/ I/82 i
NJ. STATE PLAN FOR PEACH BOTTOM #
l PA STATE PLAN FOR PEACH BOTTOM a 5/22/82 6/16/82 7/ t/82 8/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 5/29/82 9/ t/82P
)
PA LANCASTER CO PLAN FOR PEACH BOTTOM 5/22/82 6/16/82 7/ t/82 8/ 1/82 PA YORK CO PLAN FOR PEACH BOTTOM 5/22/82 6/IS/82.
7/ t/82 8/ 1/82 PA CHESTER CO PLAN FOR PEACH BOTTON 6/22/82 6/16/82 7/ 1/82 8/ t/82 i
OR' STATE PLAN FOR PBLE SPOS (PL) s
~~12/ I/Sta OR 91Lt.l AN CO PLAN FOR PEBBLE SPOS~~
.I '
.(PL) +
8.
OR MORROW CO PLAN FOR PEBBLE SPOS (PL) +
'l.
STATE PLAN FOR PEBBLE SPOS (PL) +
WA l
WA KLICKATAT CO PLAN FOR PEBBLE SPOS
.(PL)'+
i
(
NC STATE PLAN FCA PERKINS (PL) a 3/ I/86 f
NC DAVIS CO PLAN.FOR PERKINS (PL) 3/'t/86 i'
MC ROWAN CO PLAN FOR PERKINS (PL) 3/'l/86
(
NC DAVIDSON.CO PLAN FOR PERKINS (PL3 l
'i g
9
L f
STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 12 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE OTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADQTRS.
DATE FINDING FINDING DATE DATE OH STATE PLAN FOR PERRY (UCI a 6/30/82 9/ I/82 ll/ O/82 5/ O/83 OH LAKE CO PLAN FOR PERRY (UCI OH eEAueA CO PLAN FOR PERRY (UCI OH ASHTABULA CO PLAN FOR PERRY (UC)
.e PA STATE PLAN FOR PERRY (UCI e-
-4 KY STATE PLAN FOR PHIPPS BEND (UC) e NC STATE PLAN FOR PHIPPS BEND (UCI e
~
, 8, TM STATE PLAN FOR PHIPPS BEND (UC) a TN HAWKINS CO PLAN FOR PHIPPS BEND
~
+
(UCI l
. TN OREEME CO PLAN FOR PHIPPS BEND (UCI TN.SULLIVAN CO PLAN FOR PHIPPS BEND,
?
IUCI VA STATE PLAN FOR PHIPPS BEND (UC) e
... MA ' STATE PLAN FOR PILeRIM-s 6/16/81 3/ 3/82-4/ 0/82 4/.7/82 4/ I/82 4/ t/82 5/ 7/82P t
, MA BOURNE PLAN FOR PILORIM 6/16/81 3/ 3/82-4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 i
MA CARVER PLAN FOR PILORIM 6/16/88 3/ 3/82-4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 MA DUx8URY PLAN FOR PILORIM 6/18/61 3/ 3/82-4/ O/82 4/ 7/82
~~, MA HANOVER PLAN FOR PILGRIM 6/16/81 3/ 3/82-4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA KINGSTON PLAN FOR PILORIM 6/16/88 3/ 3/82-4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 I~~
MA -LAKEVILLE PLAN FOR PILORIN 6/16/81 3/ 3/82-4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA 'MARSHFIELD PLAN FOR'PILORIM 6/16/81 3/ 3/82 ~ 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 I
i-MA.MIDDLEBOROUGH PLAN FOR PILORIM 6/16/81' 3/ 3/82-4/ O/82- '4/ 7/82
.- MA PYLMPTON PLAN FOR PILeRIM.
6/16/81'
.3/ 3/82-4/ 0/92 4/ 7/82 l
MA, WAREHAM PLAN Fort PILORIM 6/16/81 3/ 3/82 ' 4/ O/82, 4/.7/82 l
MA BRIDGEWATER PLAN FOR PILORIM 6/IS/81 3/ 3/82
'4/ O/82
.4/ 7/82
-MA PLYMOUTH PLAN FOR PIL9 RIM 6/16/81
,3/ 3/82
.'4/.0/82' 4/ -7/82 '
,(
RI STATE PLAN FOR PILORIM's i
... WI ' STATE PLAN ~FOR POINT BEACH &.
3/.'9/82-I/22/88 5/28/82 I4/ 1/82 3/15/82-6/28/82P lil MANITOWOC CO PLAN FOlt' POINT BEACH...
4/f 6/81 -
4/ 6/81 3/ 9/82-1/22/01 5/28/82
. ' " - WI KEWAUNEE CO PLAlf FOR, POINT BEACH.
' 4/, 6/81J 3/ 9/82. 1/22/81' 5/28/82 l
t I
MN STATE PLAN FOR PRAIRIE ISLAND s +:
3/12/81 12/ 8/81' 10/15/80 3/26/82
'4/ t/82 3/ '/82-4/26/82P a
MN DAKOTA CO PLAN FOR PRAIRIE ISLAND
-3/12/88 12/ 8/81 10/15/80 3/26/82 MN GOODHUE CO PLAN FOR PRAIRIE ISLAND 3/12/8 12/ 8/81 10/18/80 3/26/82
]
WI STATE PLAN FOR PRAIRIE ISLAND +
4/ 6/88 12/ 8/81 10/16/80 3/26/82 4/ I/82 3/.1/82-4/26/82P' j
WI PIERCE CO PLAN FOR PRAIRIE ISLAND 4/ 6/81 12/ 8/81, 10/18780 3/26/82 j
.J I A
~~STATE PLAN FOR QUAD CITIES +~~
8/20/88 5/20/81 8/17/81 5/14/82-4/ I/82' 3/ 1/82-- 6/14/82P
. ! *
~~I A *. SCOTT -CO PLAN FOR OUAD CITIES I A~~
~~CLINTON. CO. PLAN FOR QUAD CITIES 8/20/81 5/20/81 6/l7/81, 5/14/82 8/20/81,, 5/20/81~~
'6/17/81~ ~5/14/82 l*
IL STATE
~~PLAN FOR.0UAD CITIES s' +.-~~
4/16/82 5/20/81 6/17/80' 5/14/82 4/ 1/82' 3/ t/82-6/14/82P t-IL ROCK ISLAND CO PLAN FOR OdAD*CETIES,
' /16/82 5/20/88 6/17/89
'5/14/82 4
'd, 2
_________._.___._.__m._,.___._._-__.__._._.__
L 1
4 e
[
~~
~~' ' ~~~
STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE I3 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REOUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARIMO LICENSE
. CTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADQTRS.
DATE.
FINDING FINDING DATE DATE,
lL WHITESIDE CO PLAN FOR QUAD CITIES 4/16/82
~5/20/81 8/97/81 5/14/82 CA STATE PLAN FOR RANCHO SFCO e 8/15/82 8/23/82 8/18/82 10/15/82 4/ 1/82 4/ I/82 11/15/82P CA SACRAMENTO'CO' PLAN FOR RANCHO SECO 8/15/82 8/23/82 8/l8/02 10/15/82
,i CA AMADOR CO PLAN FOR RANCHO SECO 8/15/82-6/23/82 8/18/82 10/15/82 CA SAN JOAOUIN.CO PLAN FOR RANCHO SECO 8/15/82
,6/23/82 8/18/82 10/15/82 j
CA CALAVERAS CO (1) PLAN FOR RANCHO 8/15/82 6/23/82 8/18/82 10/15/82 SECO 4
'LA STATE' PLAN FOR MlVER SEND (UC) s.
5/ O/82
6/ O/82 6/ O/82 7/ O/82 11/29/82'.11/29/82 11/29/82 4/ O/83 10/ O/83 f
LA WEST FELICIANA PLAN FOR RIVER. BEND 5/.0/82 _ 6/ O/82 8/ O/82 7/ O/82 (UC)
LA EAST FELICIANA PLAN FOR RIVER BEND 5/,0/82.,,8/ O/82-8/ 0/82 7/ 0/82 (UC)
~~LA POINTE COUPE PLAN FOR RIVER BEND 5/ O/82 6/'O/82 8/ O/82 7/ 0/821 1~~
. (UC)
LA EAST BATON ROUSE PLAN FOR RIVER 5/ 0/82 6/ O/82 8/ 0/82 7/ O/82 BEle (UCI O
.I LA-WEST BATON ROUSE PLAN FOR RIVER 5/ O/82 8/ O/82 6/ O/82 7/ O/82 i
SEhD (UC)
']
HS STATE, PLAN FOR R3VER BEND (UC) #
.I MC ' STATE PLAN FOR ROBINSON #-
1 BC STATE PLAN FOR ROBINSON e 3/ 3/81 3/11/01 3/10/81. 7/24/81 4/ 1/82 12/29/81 SC DARLINSTON CO PLAN FOR ROBIN 8ON 3/ 3/81' 3/11/01 3/10/88 7/24/88 12/29/01 SC, CHESTERFIELD CO PLAN FOR ROBIN 8ON 3/ O/St -
3/11/01. '.3/10/81 7/24/09 12/29/81 j
SC~ LEE CO PLAN FOR ROSIN 8ON 3/ 3/81 3/11/81 3/10/81 7/24/03 12/29/81 I
1 FL STATE PLAN FOR ST LUCIE (U) a 4/ 1/82 2/11/82 2/10/828 '5/ I/82 4/ 1/82 3/15/82-8/ 1/82P 10/ O/82 i
'l
- FL ST LUCIE CO PLAN FOR ST LUCIE (U) 4/ 1/82 2/11/82 2/10/82s 5/ t/82 d*
FL. MARTIN CO PLAN FOR ST LUCIE (US-4/ I/82 2/11/82 2/10/82s 5/ 1/82 i-DE STATE PLAN FOR SALEM +
1/.4/82 4/ 8/81 5,27/81 1/15/82s.4/28/81 4/24/81 3/26/82 4/28/81 DE NEW CASTLE CO PLAN FOR SALEM' 1/ 4/82 4/ 8/81
'5/27/81 1/15/82s DE KENT CO PLAN FOR SALEM 1/ 4/82 4/ 8/81-5/27/81 1/15/82s MD STATE PLAN FOR SALEM e' NJ STATE PLAN FOR SALEM s +
2/ 8/82s 5/19/82
.4/29/81 4/16/82 4/28/88 4/24/81 5/16/82P 4/28/81 MJ SALEM CO PLAN FOR SALEM 2/ 8/82s 5/19/82 4/29/88 4/18/82 NJ' CUMBERLAND CO PLAN FOR SALEM.
2/ 8/82s 5/19/82 4/29/88 4/16/82 NJ ELSIP8 BORO PLAN FOR SALEM 2/ 8/82s 5/19/82 4/29/81 4/96/02 NJ LWR ALLOW TWNS65* PLAN FOR SALEM 2/ 8/82s 5/19/82 4/29/81 4/16/82 MJ MANNINGTH TWNSHP PLAN FOR SALEM 2/ 8/82s 5/19/82 4/29/81 4/16/82 NJ pet #tSVLE TWNStr PLAN FOR SALEM I2/ 8/82s 5/19/82 4/29/81 4/IS/82 NJ OUINTON TWN8tF PLAN FOR SALEM 2/-8/82s 5/19/82 4/29/01 4/IS/82 003 SALEM CITY PLAN FOR SALEN 2/ 8/82s 5/19/82 4/29/88 4/Is/82 MJ OREENWICH TWN84F PLAN FOR SALEM 2/ 8/82s 5/19/02 4/29/81 4/18/82 I
\\
e 1 0.jh
L 1
e STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 14 NRC
-FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE CTATE PLANlDD(TIFICATION..
. SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETlHG HEADQTRS.
DATE FINDING-FINDING DATE DATE HJ STOWE CREEK PLAN FOR SALEM 2/ 8/82s 5/19/82 4/29/81 4/18/82 PA STATE PLAN FOR SALEM #
, ~
~
CA STATE PLAN FOR SAM.ONOFRE.(U).s.
' '7/15/82 ~ 5/13/81 5/18/81 9/15/82 ' 11/20/81 12/ -1/88 IO/15/82P 8/25/81 3/ O/82-CA ORANGE CO PLAN FOR SAN ONOFRE (U) 7/15/82 5/13/81 5/18/81 9/15/82 i
t CA SAN DIEGO CO PLAN FOR' SAN ONOFRE
- i (U) 7/15/82 5/13/81 5/18/81 9/15/82 CA SAN JUAN CPASTO PLAN FOR SAN 7/15/82 5/13/81 8/18/81 9/15/82 ONOFRE (U)~
l CA CAMP PENDLETON Pt.AN FOR SAN ONOFRE-7/15/82 I! /13/81'.
5/18/81 9/15/82 (U)
CA SAN CLEMENTE PLAN FOR SAN ONOFRE 7/15/82 5/13/81 5/18/81 9/15/82 (U)
MA STATE PLAN FOR SEA & ROCK (UC) +
10/30/82 10/30/82 3/ O/83 II/ O/83 MA. ESSEX CO PLAN FOR SEA 8 ROOK (UC) +
MA AMES8URY PLAN FOR SEA 8 ROOK (UC) 2 1
MA MERRIMAC PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MA NEE 8ERRY. PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
~
t MA NEWBURYPORT PLAN FOR'SEASROOK (UC) j i
MA HAVERHILL PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MA SALISBURY PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MA WEST NEWBURY PLAN FOR SEASROOK'(UCT ME STATE PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) e NH STATE PLAN FOR SEASROOK (UC) e +
10/30/82 10/30/82 3/ O/83 11/ O/83
+
j - NH ROCKINGHAM CO PLAN FOR SEABROOK i
(UC) +
+
NH E. KENSINGTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK l
(UC) l MH EXETER PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
NH OREENLAND PLAN FOR SEA 8MOOK (UC)
I NH HAMPTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) l NH HAMPTON FALLS PLAN FOR SEASROOK l
t (UC)
NH KENSINGTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
NH NEWTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
NH KINSTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) l NH NORTH HAMPTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
NH PORTSMOUTH PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) j NH RYE PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) 984 SEABROOK PLAN FOR SEASROOK (UC) l NH STRATHAM PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) l l
NH.BRENTWOOD PLAN FOR 2EASROOK (UC)
NH SOUTH HAMPTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK I
(UC) l AL STATE PLAN FOR SEQUOYAH #
11/ I/80 i
d
.t f
.m.
e
.u u
9 R
R
.R R
u u
OE o
a o
o 2
.ao
.s
.s s-s
.s
.s
=
1.
W sw
'B B
B*
s E
.2E 3
2 k
3 5-E
.i e'
k E-222 I
I asssa I
I gg sks.
2 2
AAAAA 2
2 2
.ct 223 3
's
[55((
h k
E EE s
2 a
2 5
A 2
2 2
2 2
2 Eg
,R s
-w s
s.
s c
t a
'W s
a a
s E"8 8-W k
1 2
2 2
2s i
R i
s s
s s
s s
2 m.d
.o.o.o
.=.=
3
.A A.&.&.& &.a.u s.h NNS
.N
)>
D2)22 44 4 i
A
=
i
. ll 532 23 ~~
sk EEEEE
'55555 5 23 3 EE E 2D D NN.
come. p 22 sssss ssssssa ss s 5
2,.
BBB ss-BB BBBBB B333333 32 23 3 l
["
E"g O
tcc RRR ss
~~RR ttttttt tt t tt c a.~~
ss
==
a aggggge
=
== a i
W-22:
2:
'92 Essssas 2: 2 as s t
g o
222 BB BBBBB
>>22222 22 2 ts k "5
w sss tc
~~5 a~~
ss sssss RRRR"RR tt c
=
2222222 ss s "a
a 2
o8 ass
==
sassa assssas g
. 333 ss s aa BB
~~a a:aaaaa na a:~~
e i
5 mj 555 E5
=
=
3333333 aa aa a h
!ssi e
5, 53 i 881
.d_
!2 I
~~n s~~
>s I
5m
.se =
g.
-lg gi es-slll-
=
Is.l ms.l
--= -
- as..
g sg n.g II ss 1
s
--s=vg ss
..s msg-t gg's m-u s.
5 ss
.s".s"
~~2 8 "s s s8~~
. e" ss g m.2 l m.I.L 8
s' v'8
.s L 's g,
.=
s, p
m
,, g. -
= ss
~~sss, 8gz l'gg~~
., 2 "ss].I
=
' 2g2 88=i'21"8==2
~~I "82~~
=
.s*2
'8
=2
=s m
8
=8 s 8
38 28 2
2".g 8 22asc 8
's 8 ns;2 mensas s-lr -
I=8.8 2a c
esse er.g g
ss N.ssi.as.e.s d.w.Is~~=2 xx~~
~~.o.c.o.c.og><><><><><><<>=<=< 6 gg6 o~~
~~<< 6~~
~~__.___..._.____.-7.___..~~
-s STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLAf[S FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 18 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE CTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADQTRS.
~~DATE FINDING FINDING DATE DATE I~~
PA YORK CO PLAN FOR THREE MILE ISLAND 11/13/81 8/29/81 12/18/81 3/15/02-l PA CtNSERLA89 CO PLAN FOR THREE MILE 11/13/81 8/ 2/81 12/18/81 3/15/82-lSLAND PA LEBANON CO PLAN FOR THREE MILE 11/13/81 8/ 2/81 12/18/81 3/15/82-
~~- - I SLAND l~~
~~. OR STATE Pl.AN FOR TROJAN e ~~~
~~12/ 9/80 3/ 4/81 1/luSI 1/19/82 4/ t/82 3/ t/82-4/ 1/82 l~~
+
~~-OR "COLutel A CO. PLAN FOR TROJAN.~~
~~12/ 9/80 3/ 4/81 1/12/81 1/19/82~~
!{
~~'3/29/81~~
~~,3/ 4/81 3/ 8/81 1/19/32 4/ t/82 3/ t/82-4/ 1/82~~
+
WA; STATE PLAN FOR TROJAN +
WA COWLITZ CO PLAN FOR TROJAN 3/29/81 3/ 4/81 3/ 8/81 t/19/82 3
L
-t FL STATE PLAN FOR TURKEY.PolhT s 4/ 1/82 3/15/82-3/14/82-5/ 1/82 d/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 8/ I/82P j
FL 'DADE CO PLAN FOR TURKEY POINT _ -
4/ 1/82 3/15/02.3/14/82-5/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 FL MONROE CO PLAN FOR TURKEY PolMT 4/ 1/82 3/15/82-3/14/82-5/ 1/82 4/ t/82 l
l t
MA. STATE PLAN FOR VERMONT'YAt8(EE +
8/18/81 ' 2/18/82s' 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 4/.1/82 4/ I/82 5/ 7/82P I
. - MA BERNARDSTON PLAN FOR VERMONT YA88(EE 2/ *'828 2/18/82s 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82
.MA COLRAIN PLAN FOR VERMONT YAISCEE K*
sit te 2/IS/82s.4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 3
MA' OILL FLAN FOR VERMONT YAte(EE.
2/. 2.t s 2/18/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82
?
MA OREENFIELD PLAN FOR VERMONT YAte(EE 2/*: @ 2/18/82s 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 I
MA LEYDEN PLAN FOR VERMONT YANKEE 2/ 6 /*
~~2/18/82s 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 MA NORTHFIELD PLAN FOR VERMONT YAte(EE 21 W.~~
c '/18/82s 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 HA 'WARWICK PLAN FOR VERMONT YAte(EE 2r "l*
i/li/82e 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82
. L, ' NN. STATE PLAN FOR VERMONT YANKEE +
Tj% n-N18/82s ' 4/ 0/82-4/ 7/82 4/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 5/ 7/82P
. }
NH. CHESTERFIELD PLAN.FOR VERMONT 7/77/81*. #18/82e 4/ O/82 - 4/ 7/82
~
YANKEE..
7/17/81
~~2/18/82e!'4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 -~~
?
-l
~~NH. HINSDALE PLAN FOR VERMONT YAte(EE i~~
NH RIC6810ND PLAN FOR VERMONT YANKEE 7/17/81 2/18/82s1 4/ O/82
-4/ 7/82 j
~~MH SWANZEY PLAN FOR ' VERMONT YAISTE 7/17/81. E/18/82s.4/ 0/82' 4/ 7/82' NH. WINCHESTER PLAN FOR VERMONT YAt8(EE 7/17/81 2/18/82e 4/ O/82~~
'4/ 7/82 '
4 1
NY. STATE PLAN FOR VT YANKEE e
' - t/14/81
?2/18/82e "4/ O/82 4/ 7/82
,4/ l/82 J/ t/82 5/ 7/82P'
~~VT., STATE PLAN FOR ' VERMONT~~
~~YAf8(EE. a +~~
1/.14/81
.2/18/028 4/ 0/82 4/'7/82'
..VT VERNON PLAN FOR VERMONT.YAf8(EE
. 'l/14/81 2/18/82e 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 4
VT*'OUILFORD PLAN FOR VERMONT.YAf8(EE*
, i 4
l VT BRATTLESORO PLAN FOR.VERMOF# yap 4(EE
'l/14/81 2/18/82s. 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 i
~~VT HALIFAX PLAN FOR VERMONT "Af8(EE..~~
~~. 1/14/81 f2/18/82e 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82~~
*t l
VT MARLBORO PLAN FOR VERMON? YANKEE
- 1/14/81 2/18/82s 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 l
VT
~~DuretERSTON PLAN 'FOR VERMONT YAte(EE -~~
1/14/81-2/18/828 4/ IV82 4/ 7/82 9
a s
SA' STATE PLAN FOR VO9TLE (UC) e+
SA BURKE CO PLAN FOR VOGTLE (UC)
-SC STATE PLAN FOR VOSTLE (UC) +
SC BARNWELL CO PLAN FOR VOOTLE (UC)
".'CC','AIKEN.CO PLAN FOR VOSTLE.(UC) 3 UA STATE' Pl'AN FOR.WEPSS 3.,5. (UCf ?s p
~
s
s e
STATUS 0" OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PL3NTS PAGE 17 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL NEARING LICENSE CTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADOTRS.
DATE FINDING FINDING DATE DATE
. WA GRAYS HARBOR CO PLAN FOR WPPSS 3,5 (UC) i OR STATE PLAN FOR WPPSS 1,2 4 (UC) #
WA STATE PLAN FOR WPPSS 1.2 4 (UC) a 9/13/82 II/ t/82 11/ t/82 11/ 1/82 12/ I/82P 7/ O/82 WA SENTOM-FRte(LN CO PLAN FOR WPPSS 1, 2,4 (UC)
LA STATE PLAN FOR WATERFORD (UC) a 11/25/81 6/ O/82 6I 0/82 8/20/82 2/15/82s 9/20/82P '3/23/8 II/ O/82 LA ST CHARLES PLAN FOR WATERFORD (UC) 11/25/81 6/ O/82 6/ O/82 8/20/82 LA ST JOHN PLAN FOR WATERFORO (UC) 11/25/81 8/ O/82 6/~0/82 8/20/82 SA STATE PLAN FOR WATTS BAR (UC) #
TN STATE PLAN FOR WATTS BAR (UC) s 1/ 1/82e 8/ 9/82 4/ 5/82 6/ 1/82 7/ I/82 7/ I/82 7/ I/82P 7/ O/82 TN RHEA CO PLAN FOR WATTS BAR (UC) 1/ t/82e S/ 9/82-4/ 5/82 6/ 1/82 i '
TN McMINN CO PLAN FOR WATTS BAR (UC) l/ 1/82a S/ 9/82
,4/ 5/82 6/ I/82 4
TN MEIOS CO PLAN FOR WATTS BAR (UC) 1/ 1/82e 9/ 9/82 4/ 5/82 ' 6/ 1/82 TN ROANE CO PLAN FOR WATTS BAR (UC) 1/-1/82: 8/ 9/82 4/ 5/82 6/ 1/82 t
i KS STATE PLAN FOR WOLF CREEK (UC) e 12/ 0/82 11/ O/82, 8/ O/82 1/ O/83 5/30/82 5/30/82 2/ O/83P 10/ O/82 4/ O/83 KS COFFEY CO PLAN FOR WOLF CREEK EUC) 12/ O/82 11/ O/82 6/ 0/82 1/ O/83 KS ANDERSON CO PLAN FOR WOLF CREEK (UC) l CT STATE PLAN FOR Yale (EE-ROWE #
MA STATE PLAN FOR YAf8(EE ROWE a +
8/16/81 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 ' 4/ t/82 4/ t/82 5/ 7/82P MA SUCKLAND PLAN FOR Yale (EE-ROWE 1/15/82e 3/25/02 4/ O/82
'4/ 7/82 e'
MA CHARLEMONT PLAN FOR YAte(EE-ROWE 1/15/82s 3/25/02 4/ 0/02 4/ 7/42 MA CLARKS8URO PLAN FOR YApe(EE-ROWE 1/15/82 3/25/82 4/ 0/02 4/ 7/82 MA COLRAIN PLAN FOR YAfe(EE-ROWE 1/15/82e-3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA FLORIDA PLAN FOR YAte(EE-ROWE 1/15/82a 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA HAWLEY PLAN FOR YAtetEE-ROWE 1/15/82e 3/25/82 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 l
MA HEATH PLAN FOR YAte(EE-ROWE 1/15/82s 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA MONROE PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/82 3/25/82 4/ O/82'*.4/ 7/82 i
MA NO. ADAMS PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/82 3/25/82 4/ 0/87 -. 4/'7/82 i
MA SAVOY PLAN FOR YApe(EE-ROWE 1/15/82s 3/25/82 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 MA ROWE PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/82: 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 NH STATE PLAN FOR YAte(EE-ROWE #
NY STATE. PLAN FOR YAte(EE-ROWE #
VT STATE PLAN FOR YAte(EE-ROWE ?
1/14/81 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 4/ I/82 4/ t/82 5/ 7/82P VT STAMFORO PLAN FOR Yale (EE-ROWE 1/14/81 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 VT READS 80RO PLAN FOR YApe(EE-ROWE 1/14/81 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 VT WILejlNGTON PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/14/81 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 e
VT.WHITINGHAM PLAN FOR YAte(EE-ROWE 1/14/81 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82
~
VT SCARS 8URG PLAN FOR YAf8(EE-ROWE 1/14/88 3/25/82 4/ 0/02 4/ 7/82 VT WOODFORD PLAN FOft 'YAte(EE.-ROWE
~~I/14/81 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 l~~
e
~.
STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE IS NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE
. CTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADQTRS.
DAT,(
FINDING FINDING DATE DATE AL STATE PLAN FOR YELLOW CRK-(UC) +
11/ 1/83 AL LAUDERDALE CO PLAN FOR YELLOW 1I/ I/83 CREEK (UC)
AL COLBERT CO PLAN FOR YELLOW. CREEK 11/ 1/83 (UC)
- MS STATE PLAN FOR YELLW CRK (UC) s +
~
MS. TISHOMINGO CO PLAN FOR YELLOW CREEK (UC) 7/15/85 8/15/85P TN' STATE PLAN FOR YELLOW CRK- (UC) +
5/ I/85 2/ 1/85 l'/ ' I/85.
i TN HARDIN CO PLAN FOR YELLOW CREEK 5/ 1/85 2/ 1/85
'l/ t/85 7/15/85 E UC ).
IN STATE PLAN FOR ZIMMER (UC) e s
KY STATE PLAN.FOR ZIP 91ER (UC) +
3/12/82-11/18/81 ~11/16/81 5/21/82 10/'1/81 1/22/82 6/21/82P 1/25/82 7/ O/82 KY BRACKEN CO PLAN FOR ZIMMER'(UC)-
3/12/82-11/18/81 11/16/81 5/21/82 KY PENDLETON CO PLAN FOR ZIMMER (UC)-
3/12/82--11/18/81 11/16/81 5/21/82 I
KY CAMPSELL CO PLAN FOR ZIMMER (UC) 3/12/02 '11/18/81 11/16/81 5/21/82-I OH STATE PLAN FOR ZIP 99ER (UO) a +
3/12/82-11/18/81 11/16/88 5/21/82 10/.1/81 1/22/82 6/21/82P 1/25/82 7/ O/82 OH CLERMONT CO PLAN FOR ZIP 91ER (UC)
. 3/12/82-11/18/81 11/16/81 5/21/82 IL STATE PLAN FOR ZION s.+
2/26/82-7/29/81 8/12/81 7/23/82 4/ t/82 4/ I/82 8/23/82P 8
IL LAKE CO PLAN FOR ZION 6/11/82 7/29/8.I' 8/12/88 7/23/82 l
WI STATE PLAN FOR ZION +
2/26/82-10/ 7/dl 11/ 4/88' 7/23/82 4/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 8/23/82P t
Wi KENOStiA CO PLAN FOR ZION 2/26/82-10/ 7/01. 11/ 4/81 7/23/82
~
~~i NV ' STATE-PLAN'.FOR. NEW-ItAVKN 'E PL) a.~~
~~NY OSWEGO.CO PLAN FOR NEW. HAVEN (PL)~~
e
", ~
~
~
t'
~
l
-l
~ l.
i l
l I
e 8
9 g
8 g
4 e
e p
e e
6 e
STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR CURRENTLY OPERATING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 19
~
NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE OTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADQTRS.
DATE FINDING FINDING DATE DATE AM STATE FtAN FOR ARKANSAS e 6/ 3/81 3/25/81 3/20/81 8/28/81 4/ 1/82 1/27/82 AM POPE CO PLAN FOR ARKANSAS 8/ 3/81 3/25/81 3/20/81 8/28/81 1/27/82 AR JOHNSON CO PLAN FOR ARKANSAS 8/ 3/81 3/25/81 3/18/81 8/28/81 1/27/82 AR LOOAM CO PLAN FOR ARKANSAS 8/ 3/81 ; 3/25/88 3/17/81 8/28/03 1/27/82 AR YELL CO PLAN FOR ARKANSAS 8/ 3/81 3/25/81 3/19/81 8/28/81 1/27/82
~
IA STATE PLAN FOR DUANE ARNOLD a 4/ O/82 10/28/81 11/12/88 7/ 0/82 4/ 1/82 4/ I/82 8/ O/82P j
IA LINN CO PLAN FOR DUANE ARNOLD 4/ O/82 10/28/88 11/12/81 7/ O/82 IA BENTON CO PLAN FOR DUANE ARNOLD 4/ O/82 10/28/81 11/12/81 7/- 0/82 ON STATE PLAN FOR BEAVER VAL (U'l +
5/28/82 2/17/*2 3/ O/82-4/15/82 4/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 5/15/82P OH COLUMBIANA CO PLAN FOR BEAVER 5/28/82 2/17/c2 3/ O/82-4/15/82 VALLEY (U)
PA STATE PLAN FOR BEAVER VAL s + (U) 3/15/82-2/17/82e 3/15/82-4/15/82 4/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 5/15/82P PA BEAVER CO PLAN FOR BEAVER VALLEY 3/15/82-2/17/82s 3/15/82
-4/15/82 (U)
~
WV STATE PLAN FOR BEAVER VAL IUI +
2/28/82-2/17/82:
1/30/828.. 4/15/82 4/ t/82 4/ I/82 5/15/82P.
WV HANCOCK CO PLAN FOR BEAVER VALLEY 2/28/82-2/17/82s 1/30/82 4/15/82 l
(U)'
Mt STATE PLAN FOR BIO ROCK POINT s' 2/28/81 3/23/82. 12/15/80 4/ 1/82 4/ t/82 3/ 5/82-5/ I/82P 10/ O/81s MI CHARLEvolk CO PLAN FOR BIO ROCK 2/28/81 3/23/82 12/15/80 4/ 1/82 POINT.
MI EMMET CO PLAN FOR 810 ROCK POINT 2/28/81 3/23/82 12/15/80 4/ 1/82 I
l AL STATE P'LAN FOR BROWNS FERRY a If/ 1/80 9/ O/82 9/ 8/81 3/ 1/82-4/ 1/82 2/18/82,*
4/ 1/82P AL LIMESTONE CO PLAN FOR BROWHS FERRY 11/ 1/80 9/ O/82 9/ 8/81 3/ 1/82-AL LAWRENCE CO PLAN FOR BROWNS FERRY 11/ t/80 9/ O/82 9/ 8/88 3/ I/82-AL MOROAN CO PLAN FOR BROWNS FERRY 11/ I/80 9/ O/82 9/ 8/88 3/ I/82-AL LAUDERDALE CO PLAN FOR BROWNS FERRY' 1.1/ 1/80 9/ O/82 9/ 8/81 3/ t/82-TN STATE PLAN FOR BROWNS' FERRY #
g NC STATE PLAN FOR BRUNSWICK s.
7/15/81 8/'0/82 8/20/81 l'l/13/81 4/ 1/82 2/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 NC BRUNSWICK CO PLAN FOR BRUNSWICK 7/15/81 8/ 0/82' 8/20/88 11/13/81 NC NEW HANOVER CO PLAN FOR BRUNSWICK 7/15/81 8/.0/82 8/20/81. II/13/dl 1
EC STATE PLAN FOR BRUNSWICK e C
i DC STATE PLAN FOR CALVERT. CLIFFS 8 MO STATE PLAN FOR CALVERT CLIFFS s 4/ 1/82 11/17/81 3/l5/82-5/ I/82 4/ 1/82 3/ t/82-8/ I/82P HO CALVERT CO PLAN FOR CALVERT. CLIFFS 4/ '1/82 11/17/81 3/15/82-5/ 1/82 NO ST MARYS CO PLAN FOR CALVERT CLIFFS 4/ 1/82.11/17/81 3/15/82-5/ 1/82 i
MO DORCHESTER CO PLAN FOR CALVERT' 4/'I/82 11/17/81
~3/15/82-5/.1/82 CLIFFS
.l VA STATE PLAN FOR CALVERT CLIFFS #
=
=
s STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR CURRENTLY OPERATING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 20 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REOUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE CTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADOTRS.
DATE FINOING FINOING DATE DATE I
CT STATE PLAN FOR CONN. YANKEE e 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82s 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 4/ I/82 4/ I/82 5/ O/82P CT CHESTER PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YAte(EE 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 CT COLCHESTER PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ S/82s 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE CT DEEP RIVER PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE CT DURHAM PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YANKEE 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82s 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 CT EAST HADOAM PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE CT EAST HAMPTON PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82
?
YANKEE CT HADDAM PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YANKEE 9/ 4/81 2/ 8/82s 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 CT KILLIN0 WORTH PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82s 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE CT MARLBOROUGH PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE CT MIDDLETOWN PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE t'
CT PORTLAND PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 l
YANKEE 0
CT. HE8RON PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YANKEE 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82: 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 CT ESSEX PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YANKEE 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 i
CT WESTBROOK PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE I
CT CLINTON PLAN FOR CONNECTIC8IT YANKEE 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82s 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 l
CT MADISON PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YANKEE 9/.4/81. 2/ 6/82s 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 i
CT HIDDLEFIELD PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 YANKEE CT LYME PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YAte(EE 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82 4/ O/82 4/ O/82 CT SALEM PLAN FOR CONNECTICUT YADSCEE 9/ 4/81 2/ 6/82s 4/ O/82 4/ O/02 i
MA STATE PLAN FOR CONN YANKEE e NY STATE PLAN FOR CONN YANKEE #
RI STATE PLAN FOR CONN YANKEE e IL. STATE PLAN FOR D.C.' COOK #
IN STATE PLAN FOR D.C.. COOK e M1 STATE PLAN FOR D.C.
COOK s 2/26/91 3/30/82 12/11/80 4/30/82 4/ t/82 3/ 1/82-5/30/82P MI BERRIEN CO PLAN FOR D. C.
COOK 2/26/81 3/30/82 12/11/80 4/30/82 i
WI. STATE PLAN FOR D.C. COOK e s
IA STATE PLAN FOR COOPER STATION #
MO STATE PLAN FOR COOPER STATION +
6/.O/82 3/10/82-8/ 6/81 7/ O/82 4/ 1/82 4/ t/82 8/ O/82P MS ATCHISON CO PLAN FOR COOPER STATION 6/ O/82 3/10/82-8/ 6/81 7/ O/82 NE STATE PLAN FOR COOPER STATION a +
6/ O/82 3/10/82-8/ 6/81 7/ O/82 4/ I/82 4/ I/82 8/ O/82P NE NEMAHA CO PLAN FOR COOPER STATION 6/ O/82 3/10/82-8/ 6/81 7/ O/82 NE RICHARDSON CO PLAN FOR COOPER ST,ATION I
g 9
=
=
G 8
'A M
=
=
Uk O
O
=<
N N
l JO O
O l
l
=
1 N
=
W
=
0
~~EW 4~~
)
~~A W(~~
^Z O L
A A
A L
A A
O N
N N
=
N N
N NN N
=
Z e e
e SOS se D
e e
Ge e
eGeee J=
N N
N NNN N
NN N
(O O
e e
=== no e
O O
em o
secom
=
=
=
N NN N
ZZ 4
N N
N
%%N
~~N N N~~
N N
NN N
NNNNN 66 O T
C 000 OD O
e e
==
T 00C0D e
e o
e E
N W
N
=
=
N N
N e
o e
e e
e e
e
=
M E=
N N
N N
N N
=
N WO =
=
=
T
.Z HZ N
=
(
Z-N N
N N
J
=6 T
O T
O N
O O
N A
=
E O
W W
N N
N
=
=
N N
N
'N e
e e
e O
e OMW N
N N
N gWe =
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
ZD4
=
E 00 N
(
W T
T T
C O
T T
T T
W E
g e e e s e e e a OM NNN NNN NNNN
=
NN NNNNN
==
NNN
=
EE ese ese esce
'See ee mee#S se eG emese
> %%s NNN NNNN
%%N NN NN NN
%%N NNNNN O
>0 000 Oma esse see On me C0000 000 00000
==
2 00
=
==
'NNN
==
NN NNN
. =% % % % %
==
((
NNN
%%N NNNN NNN NN
%N NNNNN NN NNN
=>
WW TTT 000 NNNN
-====.
NN bbbbb 90 000.
=
EZ K
W 0000 000 00 NN e e e A
NNN 000 OO NNN
=
=
0 O ##c See eee se So Ge###
es ese eee G OZ NNN NNNN NNN NN NN
%%%%N NN NNN NNNNN
== mmm bbb C000 ese ce hb COOTT On TTY S0000 J
Jk NNN 0000
=
==
==
NNN NNNNN mW NNN NNN NNNN NNN NN NN NNNNN NN NNN
%%%%N Z
5W S00 0000
=
==
=
==
te NNN 00000
=
==
eseem W
AZ
=
E 5'
NNNNN4 W NNu NNN
===-
NN
=
==
NNN NNNNN O
e See ese emee meGeee ee e.
ewe Geeee
=
NNN
-NNN
%%NN NN
%%NNN NN NNN NNNNN E
ko 000 000 0000 000000 00 NNNNN.
NN C0000
=
O ZK 000 0000'
==
NNNNN
==
NNN
.6
=W NNN
%%N NNNN NN NNNNN NNN NNNNN M
SW
- Same
--====
OO bbbbb ee
=
~~C0000 Ox 600 One~~
==
==
=
Z(
Z 8 e COO 00 J
O NNN
=
==
==
===NN 00 00000
=
L J=
e##
eee emee*
ese ce se esece C#
ee.
eGeee M
NNN NNN NNNN NN NN NN NNNNN 000 99 NN-
=
NN 000 esame W
M===
.000
==
NNN 0000 NN
==
NNN
=
OZ NNN NNN NNNN N%N NN NN NNNNN NN NNN NNNNN
=
M km TTT NNN 0000
--* em bb 00000 cc ese Weece e
5
--=
=
k M
4 O
4O E
W
+J M
m>E W
X J
(
Z 3
-W MW u
+J(mQ
=
EE>
0mMM e=
40 54 Z
WW Z
E U
E O
'(
W =
>JE WWeW ZW' M W-k E Z>
>Z M
=<
MM e WO
+W ut 0
=
0 Z ENJ MMM
'mOMZS J>
' =A E
6
(>
(
Z k O
M(
WW-M MWW mEWe+W EN JC6J EM Z
Mc J>>
Ge>=
ZWEOZ (J
J
>H 46 (E.
a Z m HE
=
k
-( E M WEOMW
>6E>>E
(=
0 00 k
=
0 WO>
MMO(
00 WO
.W (WW4 Ak-6 kE
=O Z
6 0
M EEM JE6JJ6 N
> 6H MO O
GE O M E
==
>EO
>>E WEOQW EO EE HE E6 EZ 4
E WOEZ6
=
6 EO
-( < O E '
06 E 46E44
=0 O 20
-k
=
0 60 06 0060' 6
O 6 066 66 6Z 6 6
0 6 6 Z
.=
6' Z
26 6
4 A
6 Z A E6 2
KZ(6E EC EE-EZ EJ K E6 E Z Z
(Z 04J O DJZOOZ O
DA CD 0
024 4
6 2 66J 6JAZ6 6A 66.
6 6 060 6Z
.6 J
6A A
A 4 00-(
A
=
E ZZ A Z OJZ ZOAZZ Z
Zu ZZ ZJ
.ZA Zg M 8'.
- 58 38"'
"O550 38 52 5'
5 8sJ 8
ZkA O
A J ZOLLO A
A LO O
A (J
(
>J O
3 O
MO W
WW3M WOW W WMbWW>
W W=<W=
W W
W=
>>(4 MZOJW WME>>J WW WEMMZ WO kJ 4>
(>
((MO (DZJC 4 Z(CE 43 (Ek(M (J
(>
.( A 6>
>=W
>>>3 NEW->
Wh>(
HM
>W MA W(
WQJ MMOJ Meg 3M M ZWMW MC MZ M2-
~~3 M3 M4>3>~~
j W
H(
JJJ
=ZZZ JJJJZ J J J'J 4 ( '
((<WW 00
((((4
> 666 E000
'((4600 ZZ
===ZZ 00 ZZ 00000
=
M.
...s -.. _.. =..
e l
STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR CURRENTLY OPERATING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 22 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REOUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE OTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE. MEETING HEADQTRS.
DATE.,
FINDING FINOING. DATE DATE CT STATE PLAN FOR INDIAN POINT 8 3/ 2/02-4/ 1/82 5/ 7/82 4/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 6/ 7/82P NY STATE PLAN FOR INDIAN POINT a 8/18/81
~NY WESTCHESTER CO PLAN FOR INDIAN 8/18/81 3/ 2/82-4/ 1/82 5/ 7/82 POINT NY ROCKLAND CO PLAN FOR.lHDIAN POINT 8/18/81 3/ 2/82-4/ 1/82 5/ 7/82 NY ORANGE CO, PLAN FOR INDIAN POINT 8/18/81 3/ 2/82-4/ 1/82 5/ 7/82 NY PUTNAM CO PLAN FOR INDIAN POINT 8/18/81 3/ 2/82-4/ 1/82 5/ 7/82 FA STATE PLAN FOR INDIAN POINT e e
e.
WI STATE PLAN FOR KEWAUNEE a 4/ 6/81 3/ 9/82-1/22/81 5/28/82 4/ 1/82 3/ t /6.:-
6/28/82P WI KEWAUNEE CO PLAN FOR KEWAUNEE 4/ 6/81 3/ 9/82- 'l/22/81 5/28/82 WI MANITOWOC CO PLAN FOR KEWAUNEE 4/ 6/81 3/ 9/82-1/22/81 5/28/82
, STATE PLAN FOR LA CROSSE +
.IA lA ALLAMAKEE PLAN FOR LA CROSSE MN STATE PLAN FOR LA CROSSE +
4/ 1/82 10/21/81 10/22/81 5/ 3/02 4/ 1/82 4/ t/82 6/ 3/82P MN HOUSTON CO PLAN FOR LA CROSSE-4/ I/82 10/21/81 10/22/81 5/ 3/82 WI STATE PLAN FOR LA CROSSE a +
4/ 6/81 10/21/81 11/10/81 5/ 3/82 4/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 6/ 3/82P e
e WI VERNON CO PLAN FOR LA CROSSE 4/ 6/81 10/21/88 11/10/81 5/ 3/82 0
MA STATE PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE e ME STATE PLAN FOR MAINE YAKEE a 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 4/ t/82 1/29/82 3/20/82-ME ARROWSIC PLAN FOR MAINE YAte(EE 6/18/88 9/26/81 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 30/ 7/81 11/20/88 ME GEORGETOWN PLAN FOR MAINE YAl8(EE 6/18/81 9/26/81.10/ 7/81 11/20/81 i
ME PHIPPS8URG PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/l8/81 9/26/81 ME WEST BATH PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/88 10/ 7/81 11/20/89 ME BATH PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME BOWDOINHAM PLAN FOR. MAINE YAf8(EE 6/18/81 9/26/81. 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME WOOLWICH PLAN FOR MAINE YAMEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME BRUNSWICK PLAN FOR MAINE YAte(EE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81 11/20/88 ME ALNA PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81' 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME BOOTHBAY PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 IO/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME BOOTHBAY HAR80R PLAN FOR MAINE 6/18/88 9/26/88 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 YANKEE ME BRISTOL PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81' 11/20/81 ME DAMARISCOTTA PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81' 11/20/81 ME DRESDEN PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 ~ 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME EDGEcote PLAN FOR MAlHE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/.7/81 11/20/81 ME NEW CASTLE PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/88 9/26/81 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME SOUTH BRISTOL PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81, 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME SOUTHPORT PLAN FOR MAINE YANKEE 6/18/81 9/26/81 10/ 7/81 11/20/81 NE WESTPORT PLAN FOR MAINE YAl#;EE 6/18/83 9/26/8110/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME WISCASSET PLAN FOR MAINE YAt8(EE 6/18/81' 9/26/8).'
10/ 7/81 11/20/81 ME LINCOLN CO PLAN FOR MAINE YAl8(EE ME SAGADANOC CO PLAN FOR MAINE YAP 8(EE NH STATE PLAN FOR MAINE Yale (EE e t
+
m.
m-,
.,m
w N
E OE 38 3 eN y
Ew 2
2a2 4
g.------
h h
h h
s_'******
e e
N g g,,,,,,,.
2
's A
4 i
o tt 333223 g
Et E
'n 2
2
't
~E 5
s 4
2 2
.1 g
5C E 4 ~
E h
-5 4
i.
O W
.N
.N
.N E
~~s s.~~
o a
= E5 8.t--
2 2
1 g
y
,s
,s t
,s a
.EW5 b
~~= = = =. =~~
NNNNNNNNNNNN NNN NN
= * = = = = = *.
N N r'N
' E * *.****
~
~~E E8 222222~~

F.
EEE 2*
~~~~
<<sssus
,s s s,s u,T T,,s s s su k
i.a DCOMOS TT TTT DDD WN
.s.u.s.s.s.
sss u
ssu he 0000 4
E I
b 09 *** *o
~~NNNNN coco.~~
~~NNNNNNN~~
=
==
ww=
=
NNNN 3
oooooooooooo.
ggg ggy ssssss g.,g W,y ggggNg'
. s s,s,s,s,s s s,s N N s-s%%
Ns ss s e. N
~~s. s. s.~~
'.ssss
~ r
,r a
k D
M NNNNNN NNNNNN
\\...
E in ***eee
~~NNNNNN:::::-~~
eet ee:
eee:
e :::
NNN we ooo ooo NNNN 222222222222 2"
~~E' 2222 5 W _h _h _n _s _h _s AAAAAAAAAAAA 23h 22 232 222 3333~~
~ p.
E o.....
'E ******
AA te cannaa t**
g.
8 gyg gg eage mi wu
- - - - _u_
~~u.. s. s s u. s u...u.~~
.u..s.
uss
.u..s
.s.u.
uu i
i 8
5 5
5
-5 b -
~5
~
"~
o 5
E~5 W5-55 SE egggE E-g~..
d St
~
E
.--e-
's~x 5 g$ *=g-1.g e5-se g : _:,s:.I s e t S g e smo:1 e5.
8 i
e e =s.wre
.-o ec te x-5.
1m. s,<
1=m E
see I m=
8 so
.-Eddd EdSEgEyg 3
m EEg' Eg-
~~- EmE EWW'.~~
...r E_g m
-o g
www8 O =
5 S
EES*ddi SS Ae g*
eg*5 deE=E !ee 5=
deE!!
j g'5 gr*g5
.t w3 15.
_E
= mE-zw= 2=55 Mw2 zu
$$mEm iE
~~Ew 6~~
z u
886=2
EB }*p=p=E. Epi]*]mz zw E*og E*
E*
EE*g =2*
x
[i 2'i 2i i }g i}
Wi 2
E5552
==]= o8]
g
=w ra i 2t=8ggra <2 2 E >E.[ r mi
~~25j gg=2 2BW mi w~~
===g g
r
=
=
=
2258g8 2 ao.-2 28 i
ft so=W**Bs
~~8 alss:m y sEs_ga W or.,l:asoE2m seg~~
~~s.: :s i..g g i f <.s. -: -- g j.gg sg mshEgsi.,~~
a i.a s l
sm i
as musul susass:
ssa.
58:an u.g n _ <n=3 asa t a
000000000000 a....
l i
t t
2 6
l
,.y EWW o-38
,a g
w
=
0
=W f
O L
E:
2 a_
s it 8 s
~
-- s bb b
,s 52 E
5g 2 3
EC 3 2
e N
$h$
5 2
w 3
w
=
a
~~5. NNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNNN~~
~~'E RRR R R R R~~
~~R R R~~
~~R R~~
~~R R~~
~~R R R.R~~
.R.*R.
y
>g een e e e e e e e e a e e e e e e e e e e 2
,2g.RRR R. R.R R R.R R.R.R R R R..*.R.R.R.R.R.R RtRR NNNN
=
W A
N.N N N
.N
.N
.N
.N
.N
.N N.
0000 N N N N N N N N N
N N
O SE 222 2 22222 2222 222 2 22 222 3333 d
f"y;,R,R," R.,R.R R,",R R,R R R, R, R, R R, R R,,R R,R scts x
NNNN I
ata A.a a a a. e.a.a a.4,e a.a.e e a..a A a A.ase.
w o
=
-3 33333333333333333
~~333 3333 E~~
'5 Rtt t t t t t c R.
RR R R R R RRR R R R R RR R-Og een e e e e e e.
e e e e o e e e e e e e NNNN p "E'&&5&aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa RRR,,*.,* R,,* *
~~R,* R R R R, R,,* R R~~
R R R.*.t.*
w 3 wlnhh4s'skhhh-Ahhhhhhhh3%h EEEE m
b b
=
w
~~w w w~~
w =.
=
w =
=
=
=
=
l S
.5 W505 55555
~~5: W E..~~
~~E M*EE~~
~~E I E E Es s s'E I E E E~~
~~E E~~
E **
E EEE EEE a
aa g s.
a==
E E
s
= ee Jan
!,.s.',! 8 !.E E E E E E !.E 'g = ! E.' E.E EE
$$f33 E
<<Eze 5 Ws2 2 r
==
2=2=22222=*2 e2z 2
~~e* WW sv 88~~
=
=r 2
$ sE 2
2 2
2 wt R
ss z
~
E'ElaB I
~~I. EE B~~
=
55 ]=
2StEi E
E
==8 ]
B
.=
IE E.El*
s E a,r l s==gs,8s s " <E E 2 ps:-
bo5g555g5$sssass!555 5!52565tsw555l s
!!!d!
E e
w-r s.
O e
- p's
's*5 s*-i
=
s w
EjW5M 5t555 l
g 5*5EE WWa!E is!!!!!!:sasase ssstsisisisis!sisa e
5 222 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ff
~~EEEE~~
..c....
p as 38 E
W s.
E8 E
h.
h.
h h
h h
h.
h.
h.
s._
2 I
I 19 Et 4
2 3
Es i
i i
i i
Eg 2
2 2
2 3
2 2
2 s_
t.
R.
N, c.
,N
~
I$
=
2 2
s 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
E
"*g<O E
N, N,
N, N,
N, N,
N, N
N E
g y
I' E
\\
N. N. N, N N. N N.
N N. N N N. N N. N. N N..N. N N.
N. N N.
N N. N N. N N N N N. N. N.
N N..N N.
m E
h bhhhNbhb NN I
e
==
22 2444442442444 555 EEEEE EEEEEE EEEE
$g 22
=-
NNNN gCOgO A
NNN NNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNN
=
Of Rtt RRR*
t*RRttt*ttte Rt*
.NR.RN.R tt*Rtt R.**.,*.
bhbbbh
==
=====**
0000000000000 ggg NNN NNNNN N N N N,N,N N,N N,N N N N NNN NNNN
-lW 00000 nnn nunn
=
W y
Essss sassss
.= U AAAAAAAAAAAAA 333333 AAAA g
EEE EEEE AkhAsshnkAnks AAA
.hs.tst E33553 5555 g
2 s!
~~2:22 Essssssssssss Ess Essss Esstat g:~~
~~Ass 'ss s 23; 333 32 ee~~
~~c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c.~~
~~m,,,~~
~~c. c. c. N,N, e.e.e.c,c,c, c. c. c. c.~~
... e. t. t. e.
2
>l O
A b
8 O
d.
3 Ez
~~g*E ca e~~
h
. 5:..i :g g
.E. sE
'8
.fi.
E.E 2
.E.s 5
s
. E-E
. 00
$g.O E
gr
,g, 5,g3,
,3
-O 5
EE**EEEC zzE,5EEEEzSE.
egE "EE*s 3
1EI 0:850 525 5 55 g 0
! E255EE*zd WE t*C t "Eg"B zEEEEESd E EE WE
.s!.s "E
E E E"-
'zz8 EESSdE'!d!g -
~~e. zz[8 ['3' EddEE' zEz'E '5 5g!~~
E Eg!
8"E$2'*
Ez!e d
EE'EE EE **
i 5 !$5'2 ' E E ""
gE'r E**EE E'2EEt E*;z EE' 1*
E E
g e
=
x.
z5 52 mz Eg*8' 2r
'2 '2 "5:58 E*25*
E
! "E5 2*55 "p E..""z*2 z'2* 2' '8=8
= 8*
~~- 3 ' 3B~~
"2
'20==*8*
zz22 0
2.
pg
~~8'*S.E 22.zia-E~~
=
2 82 2s8 usansurg; al el:a!:st l 2 2
28 28 5d sz g.28"225
.sl.-gz
.r s p
g.
1
.s s
g--
.l, 2Egsle
=2 meg
=ltar:
_2 20 =
~~sumass-O a slaE nEtsse:~~
se.s a as :
anz a
t.
l 5 EEEE2ffff 1111111111111E Ess EEEss 555ddd 5555
g*
2
.E.
s.
s.
s s
2-e e
o as s
s o
a i
e
=.w-E3 L
L L
E sass 2
2 223 19 3333 2
3 3
3 333
.u..
tt 3333 3
3 3
3 533 EE i
a s
s a
E 5-3 3
3 2
3 E!
R
,e e
5 s.
.e
-w a
K O
E 2
a a
s E
o ib s
s s
s s
s Eh2' 2
.a c
3 3
3 3
2 4
5
=
i
!n. :
aaaa
=
~~= ::::::::::=~~
~~= :-~~
>8~3 3333 222 333 33333333333 333 3 's 3 333 byR e e.n r.te m..
R R R R R,R,R,R,R R,R R e,t RRR. C. 'R R o
nr
.s m.
Ess; iii Esa ssssssssss; s as s' s s 282 E! :2 3333 333 333 33333333333 333 3 3 3 333 e
sc R RRRR R.R.R. e. e. e. e t t e c,e,e,e e,c,e, RRR. t R e tRR.
lg.
anne

asas ass :::e::::::
ass a s.s U' ;
2233 322 333 33333333333 333 3 3 3 222 5.e Rt.t.s.
RR.t.
s,s,,s R. R. R I..t s t.R R. t R.t t. R..R.
t o<
s.s s SW g
g 'n.
'... ::AssaAAAAA~
k..
~~.
ls.
t.**
y
~~m. m..~~
gg
. g g ggg mg s
,m,,
ms m.
- - -.. s m.. m.. m.. m.
m s s s s
~~m..~~
~~~ s - -
v.
=
ll s,
s
.s=
SI I=
s
,3, m 3 ms s
g n
I a
-g
-g.
s
=
amis :
es 5
=Is !
s I l e"si 1,ss*8ss5 8
l sus =!"
. 5..s.s--est.
sa k E5g 2I.!s>"
0 so<==
L =
E'iS52
!
~~m2 = =!gs'E stav.e.'**parg3:5~~
~~.as.~~
~~=t gg)~~
-s c
.Jg.
Ch LL es v
2 N..Z Zh L
LE.
A
> = =
ssa. g g Lo bL
=ZZg 2Z O
2 sg=ss. 21gi[yE}.
8L se=
sa sss-}
~~8 s=~~
2s e c s.
pd' =s-ZZgW Zb ZW5 g
> Er 2 =8 p p-c.}.
p.8 rr=8
=
o-588 zSY g=
pg]!m g
~~38. ppg <"n<nta=3 gBE t~~
se.
e es -*'
a!xatsg 5.is g!.
g.e,s r
.8 t
v -s e
o ss 22 *.
2":
...mg s< -
g 43
>> I.
mus k am
>>1
>>>I.
>s.<.34 3-
...o sf.8.<.tr>
o.
.. os W
.did
===E22222222222 555 5 5 5 diEEE o-.-
55 E2222 9
i E.
w l
22 I
3*
1 i
s
~
g O
sW 2
~~E s~~
O b
E i
I I
I I
"s.
2
_3 J2 2 2
s s
s 1
cc h
4 44 3
h 2
2 i
_t h.
b.
~~b. b.~~
~~u. N. N..~~
N.
N N.
a 5!
2
~~2. 2~~
.222 2
2 2
l i
_E s
c s s s s,s s,
s s
g m
o o
e n 1
S.
=
n a u
a.
.u -
u.
2 E "*W 2
22 2
2 2
2 l
Eg<
4 4
44
'4 4
4 4
l t
l si anzas a
.hk 4 64 L
. unun nun unnuununun unuu a
'l I
t ** *
~****
_E E8
""*** a
* "" =
^^******** ****
~~l m_ _ w s.~~
ss s w s.
m- _ _ s.
~~u. s.~~
,u, s. s m,, s, s. s,,
,,,, s ww y
gy no
~~e. e n.e 5~~
t asassEs as i ss E assa' 22:22:22:
' ::: 2 b
of sssssss ss s ss s ssss sss ssssssssss ssss s 3
2222222
2 *
"~**
i g.
sssssss ss s ss s ssss sss s,s,s s,s s s s,s s,. s,,s,s s s
g
,y yyyyyuy gu y gu y
_-an aan 1
g m___
~~6 amazaassaa maan a e~~
~~eeeeee:~~
~~e ee e eee eeeeeeeeet eeee e i~~
~~ ~
~
ese
-res-esens se e s
_av sasassa
=~
m w
s s s s. s s s s s.
s ssssssssss ssss s u
3333333
.s.s.s
.s u..s
.s s.s unuunununu muun u 1,
o_
sasssas sa a sa a esss s=======ss sass a i
<=
a aa maa:
222
~~2 m m n n===~~
=
t sm:a aaa e
sm cc c cc c mee a,-
cm m _ cc cccc c
-l
=
== === =.
un".
~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ -
b W
b g
s M
~ +
t n-
... e 2s.
n
+n t.te-
- et -
~~-v. - ve-lin e~~
e s-
.se =
e nE
! gm
- - = = _s r
<l:-I enIr :l:.I r!
i.
5 v
n.
_e-g eeg, =Es E c.a.g r -
g!* I*n:
l, s
. s..
.!r[.-s!Wl1EElWd ei
! 8 " !" ! ; l" E !H== g !: s p
'*!*am ls.sule**
st 2
nums-a s
is s s2 s =g s2.ss.g.s* !!rssm p **!s s.
m
,5 s2 m pp
>=
"2'
. {'
g
. 2_,glg..im 2 3 8 2 x m.s -
ss
=s 8'5'=3*5=d 22 ss s
e..
m m g
==8 2s
8=
~~2 5d d'5 2=~~
~~228 as I 22s s8 als 2<2" 58~~
~~sei t_s.s.w.",c 2' 5~~
2.. w.
.. s:
e t
.g.u s
.s r.
ungssaqunl<nss.
~~ge,yg s malsv<agllse ma s s~~
2 ad as sin na suosaslanoessssa:
o
- s
~~nass_._~~
l j
=
s m
STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR CURRENTLY OPERATING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PAGE 28 NRC FORMAL.
JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE OTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADOTRS.
DATE FINDING FINDING DATE DATE VT VERNON PLAN FOR VERMONT YANKEE 1/14/81 2/18/82s 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 VT GUILFORD PLAN FOR VERMONT YAM EE 1/14/81 2/18/82s 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 VT BRATTLEBORO PLAN FOR VERMONT YAM EE I/l4/81 2/18/82: 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 VT - HALIFAX PLAN FOR VERMONT YANKEE 1/14/88 2/18/82s 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 VT MA.P', BORO PLAN FOR VERMONT YAKEE 1/14/81 2/18/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 VT DtW.?RSTON PLAN FOR VERMONT YAP 8(EE 1/14/81 2/18/82s 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 CT STATE PLAN FOR YAM EE-ROWE a MA STATE PLAN FOR YAP 8(EE ROWE a +
8/18/81 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 4/ 1/82 4/ I/82 5/ 7/82P HA BUCKLAND PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/82 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA CHARLEMONT PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/82s 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA CLARKS8URG PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/82: 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA.COLRAIN PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/82s 3/25/82-4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA FLORIDA PLAN FOR ' YAP 8(EE-ROWE 1/15/82s 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA.HAWLEY PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/82: 3/25/82 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82
, ' MA. HEATH PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/82s 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA MONROE ' PLAN FOR YAP 8(EE-ROWE
- l/15/82s 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA NO. ADAMS PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/827. 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA SA'!OY PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE
- 1/15/82s 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 MA - ROWE Pl.AN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/15/82s 3/25/82.
4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 g
HN STATE PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE #
NY STATE PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 8 i
,~
VT STATE PLAN FOR YAP 8(EE-ROWE +
'l/14/81 3/25/82 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 4/ 1/82 4/.1/82 5/.7/82P VT STAMFORD PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/14/81 3/25/82
~~4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 VT' READS 80RO PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/14/81 3/25/82 4/ 0/82 4/ 7/82 4~~
I VT WILMINGTON PLAN FOR YANKEE-ROWE 1/14/81 3/25/82 4/.0/82' 4/ 7/82 i-VT WHITINGHAM PLAN FOR' YANKEE-ROWE t/14/81 3/25/82 4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 f
VT SCARS 80RO PLAN FOR Yale (EE-ROWE 1/14/81 3/25/82.
4/ 0/82 J/ 7/82
' VT WOOOFORD PLAN POR.YAte(EE.-ROWE 1/14/81 3/25/82.
4/ O/82 4/ 7/82 IL STATE' PLAN.FOR ZION's +
2/28/82-7/29/8i 8/12/81 7/23/82 4/'1/82' A/ 1/82-8/23/82P IL LAKE CO PLAN FOR ZION 8/11/02, 7/29/81
,8/12/81 7/23/82
, WI STATE PLAN FOR ZION +
2/28/82-10/ 7/81 11/- 4/81 7/23/02 4/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 8/23/82P g
WI KEMOSNA CO PLAN FOR ZION-2/28/82 10/ 7/01 11/ 4/81' 7/23/82
. -l..
f.
e O
g y
w q
- ~
~.
s e
I STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOT YET LICENSED PAGE 29 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE DTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADQTRS.
DATE FINDING FINDING DATE DATE ON STATE PLAN FOR BEAVER VAL (U) +
5/28/82 2/17/82 3/ O/82-4/15/82 4/ I/82 4/ I/82 5/15/82P a
OH COLutel ANA CO PLAN FOR BEAVER 5/28/82 2/17/87 3/ O/82-4/15/82 VALLEY (U)
PA STATE PLAN FOR BEAVER VAL a + (U) 3/15/82-2/17/82s 3/15/02-4/15/82 4/ 1/82 4/ 1/82 5/15/82P i
PA BEAVER CO PLAN FOR BEAVER VALLEY 3/15/82-2/17/82s 3/15/82-4/15/82 (U)
W STATE PLAN FOR BEAVER VAL (U) +
2/28/82-2/17/82s 1/30/82s 4/15/82 4/ f/82 4/ t/82 5/15/82P WV HANCOCK CO PLAN FOR BEAVER VALLEY 2/28/82-2/17/82s 1/30/82s 4/15/82 (U)
S/ O/84 AL STATE PLAN FOR BELLEFONTE (UC) e AL JACKSON CO PLAN FOR BELLEFONTE (UC)
GA STATE PLAN FOR BELLEFONTE (UC) #
TN STATE PLAN FOR BELLEFONTE (UC) #
j IL STATE PLAN FOR BRAIDWOOO'(UC) a 10/ O/84 4/ O/85 IL ORUNDY CO PLAN FOR.BRAIDWOOD (UC) lL WILL CO PLAN FOR BRAIDWOOO (UC) 8 IN STATE PLAN FOR BRAIDWOOO (UC) #
i IL STATE PLAN FOR BYRON (UC) s
-1/15/83
.S/ O/82 8/ O'/82 1/31/83 3/30/82-7/22/82 2/31/83P 8/ O/82 4/ O/83
'll OGLE CO PLAN FOR BYRON (UC) 1/15/83 8/ O/82 8/ 0/82 1/31/83 WI STATE PLAN FOR BYRON (UC) e
.1/15/83
-8/ O/82 8/ O/82 1/31/83 IL WINNEBAGO CO PLAN FOR BYROM (UC) a 9/ O/82 :12/ O/82 8/ O/82' 2/- 0/83 1/ 1/82 2/15/82s 3/ O/83P 5/ O/82 10/ O/82 MO STATE PLAN FOR CALLANAY (UC) l MO CALLAWAY CO PLAN FOR CALLAWAY (UC)
-9/ 0/82 12/ O/82 8/ O/42 2/ 0/83 MO MONTOONERY CO PLAN FOR CALLAWAY 9/ O/82 12/ O/82 8/ O/82
'2/ O/83 (UC)
MO OAFCONADE CO PLAN FOR CALLAWAY (UC) 9/ O/82 12/ O/82 8/
.,82 2/ O/83 MO OSAGE CO PLAN FOR CALLAWAY (UC) 9/ O/82 12/ O/82.
8/ O/82 2/ O/83 NC STATE PLAN FOR CATAWBA (UC) +
9/ O/82 9/ O/82 9/30/82 9/30/82 2/ O/83 8/ O/83 i
MC MECKLEfeERO CO PLAN FOR CATAWBA 9/ O/82 9/ O/82 (UC)
NC GASTON CO PLAN FOR CATAWBA (UC) 9/ O/82 9/ O/82 SC STATE PLAN FOR CATAWBA (UC) e +
9/ O/82 9/ O/82 9/30/82 9/30/82 2/ O/83 8/ O/83 LC YORK CO PLAN.FOR CATAWBA (UC) 9/ 0/82 9/ O/82 i
CC LANCASTER CO PLAN FOR CATAWBA (UC) 9/ 0/82 9/ 0/82 I
i NC STATE PLAN FOR CHEROKEE (UC) e EC STATE PLAN FOR CKEROKEE (UC) e CC CHEROKEE CO PLAN FOR CHEROKEE (UC)
CC YORK CO PLAN FOR CHEROKEE (UC)
s
?
e STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOT YET LICENSED STATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION FORMAL JOINT NRC PAGE 30 STATE PLAN FOR CLINTON (UC)
SU8 MISSION EXERCISE PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED IL MEETINO INTERIM FINA2.
HEARING LICENSE HEADQTRS.
DATE FIN 0lHG FINDING DATE DATE IL MACON CO PLAN FOR CLINTON (UC)DEWITT CO PLAN FOR CLINTON (UC) 1/ O/83 10/ 0/82 10/ 0/82 3/ 0/83 3/28/02 5/IS/82 4/ O/80P 8/ 0/82 1/ 0/83 a
IL 1/ O/83 10/ O/82 10/ 0/82 3/ 0/83 IL McLEAM CO PLAN FOR CLINTON (UCI 1/ 0/83 10/ 0/82 10/ 0/82 3/ 0/83 IL PIATT CO PLAN FOR CLINTON (UC) 1/ O/83 10/ O/82 10/ 0/82 3/ O/83 1/ O/83 10/ O/82 10/ O/82 3/ O/83
. TM STATE PLAN FOR COMANCHE P.
TX HOOD CO PLAN FOR COMANCHE. PEAK 4/ O/82
-l/ O/83 7/ O/82 3/ O/83 (UC) a TX SOMERVELL CO PLAN FOR COMANCHE (UC) 4/ O/82 t/ 0/83' "r/ O/82 3/ O/83 7/ 1/82 4/ O/83P 127 2/81 PEAK (UCI 4/ O/82 t/ O/83 7/ O/82 3/ 0/83 10/ O/82 CA STATE PLAN FOR DIABLO CAN IUC)
CA SAN LUIS OEIISPO PLAN FOR DIA8LO7/15/82 8/19/81 12/17/81 9/15/82 11/ I/81 52/29/81 a
CANv0M (uC) 7/15/.82 8/10/81 12/17/81 9/15/82 10/15/82P 1/ O/82s 5/ O/82 i
Mt STATE PLAN FOR FERMI MI (UC) a MONROE CO PLAN FOR FERMI 4/18/02 2/ 2/82 2/ 3/82 5/17/82 1/ 1/8R 1/28/82 8/17/82P 3,$
2 MI WAYNE CO PLAN FOR FERMI(UC) +
4/18/82 2/ 2/82 2/ 3/82 5/17/82 OH (UC) +
STATE PLAN FOR FERMI 4/18/82 2/~2/e2 2/ 3/82 5/I7/82 0/82-9/ O/82 (UC) #
LA STATE PLAN FOR ORAND OULF (UC)
LA TENSAS PLAN FOR GRAND OULF (UC) a
+
9/ 3/81 II/ 4/81 10/27/81 8/-0/82 11/15/81 3/ 1/82-7/ O/82P-MS STATE PLAN FOR GRAND GLF (UC) 9/ 3/8I II/ 4/81 10/27/81 8/ O/82 MS CLAISORNE CO PLAN FOR GRANO OULF 12/ 1/81s 11/ 4/81 11/ 3/81 m +
(UCI 12/ 1/8)s 11/ 4/81 11/\\3/81 2/28/82-11/15/81 2/ O/82s 1
4 3/ I/82-3/28/82P 2/28/82-I 2/ 0/82s NC STATE PLAN FOR HARRIS (UC)
NC WAKE CO PLAN FOR HARRIS (UC) s 3/ I/85 NC CHATHAM CO PLAN FOR HARRIS (UC)3/ 1/95
.i MC' HARNETT CO PLAN FOR HARRIS (UC)3/ 1/95 NC LEE CO PLAN FOR HARRIS (UC) 3/ I/85 8/ O/84 12/ 0/84 3/ 1/05 1
4 KY STATE PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC)
TN e
1 STATE PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC)
TPt TROUSDALE CO PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE e
I (UC)
TN TN' HACON CO PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC)SMITil CO PLAN'FOR HARTSVILLE (UC3 TN. WILSON CO PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC)
.f TM SUMMER Co PLAN FOR HARTSVILLE (UC)
I DE STATE P W I FOR HOPE CREEK (UC)
DE NEW CASTLE CO PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK (UC) +.
E o '
.e
v STATUS Or OFF-SITE PLANS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOT YET LICENSED PAGE 31 NRC i
FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED. INTERIM FINAL HEARINO LICENSE OTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETINO-HEADOTRS.
DATE FINDINO FINDINO DATE DATE DE KENT CO PLAN FOR HOPE tREEK (UC) +
MD STATE PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK (UC) e NJ STATE PLAN FOR HOPE CREK (UC) s +
NJ SALEM CO PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK (UC) +
NJ CUMBERLAND CO PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK (UC) +
PA STATE PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK (UC) e l
l l
i CT STATE PLAN FOR JAMESPORT (UC) e MY STATE PLAN FOR JAMESPORT (UC) a NY SUFFOLK CO PLAN FOR JAMESPORT (UC) t l
I t
i IL STATE PLAN FOR LASALLE (UC) s 3/31/81 4/14/82 12/ 5/80 2/18/82 11/30/81 1/28/82 3/18/82P 8/ O/82 IL LASALLE CO PLAN FOR LASALLE (UC) 3/31/81 4/14/82 12/ 5/80 2/18/82 IL ORONDY CO PLAN FOR LA SALLE (UC) 3/31/89 4/14/82 12/ 5/80 2/18/82 IN STATE PLAN FOR LASALLE (UC) e DE STATE PLAli FOR LIMERICK (UC) e MD STATE PLAN FOR LIMERICK (UC) e NJ STATE PLAN FOR LIMERICK (UC) #
PA STATE PLAN FOR LIMERICK (UC) a 4/ 0#84 10/ O/84 PA MONT90MERY CO PLAN FOR LIMERICK i
(UC)
PA BERKS CO PLAN FOR LIMERICK (UC)
PA CHESTER CO PLAN FOR LIMERICK (UC) l IN STATE PLAN FOR MARBLE H.
(UC) e +
IN JEFFERSON C3 PLAN FOR MARBLE HILL (UC)
$N SCOTT CO PLAN FOR MARSLE HILL (UC)
I IN CLARK CO PLAN FOR MARSLE HILL (UC)
KY STATE PLAN FOR MARSLE HILL (UC) +
e l
KY OLDHAM CO PLAN FOR MARBLE HILL (UC)-
KY TRIPBLE CO PLAN FOR MARSLE HILL (UC)
NC STATE. PLAN FOR MCOUIRE (U) a ll/ 3/80 12/ O/82 12/ 4/80 3/20/81 3/17/81 3/17/81 8/ 4/81 8/ O/82 NC MECKLENBERO CO PLAN FOR MCOUIRE (U) 11/ 3/80 12/ 0/82 12/ 4/80 3/20/81 8/ 4/81
'j NC -LINCOLN CO PLAN FOR MCOUIRE (U) 11/ 3/80 12/ 0/82 12/ 4/80 3/20/81 8/ 4/81 NC GASTON CO PLAN FOR MCOUIRE (U) 11/ 3/80 12/ O/82 12/ 4/80 3/20/81 8/ 4/81 l
NC IREDELL CO PLAN FOR MCGulRE (U) 11/ 3/80 12/ O/82 12/ 4/80 3/20/81 8/ 4/81 i
NC CATAWBA CO PLAN FOR MCOUIRE (U) 11/ 3/80 12/ O/82 12/ 4/80 3/20/89
'8/ 4/81 CC STATE PLAN FOR MCOUIRE e (U) i e
i I
Mt STATE PLAN FOR MIDLAND (UC) a 8/ 0/83 3/ 0/83 3/ O/83 10/ 0/83 8/30/82 7/30/82 11/ 0/83P 11/ O/82 7/ 0/83 I
I e
e e
N M
W e
W g
Z N
WW D
0 u,-
== <
N N
JD a
N f
N N
W O
KW O
O 48-L O
e L'
L L
O N
N N
M e
Z G
e e
e
.J -
N N
N N
40 C
e D
EE N
N EE D
EO N
0 N
N
=Z e
e e
e a
E==
N N
N WO e
p
==
-2
==
O Z-N' N
N N
W
== 6-N,
~~.N.~~
e O
O eZW D
o W
N O
N
.=
e' e
e e
J o M W' N.
.N N
N0
.O E >=
e
==
O O
> Z <
=
N N
N W.
O N,
9 N
e WE 5 MMM NNNNNNNNNNNN.
NN
--- -=-
MM
'E ***
ttt**tt*****
t
>g 000 000000000000 se 900 men D0 Nkh k
% %,%,%,% % % %,%,% %,N y
yy NNN O00 NN oao eee on E
MSM NNNNNNNNNNNN
- -. = = = - -
NN O See seeeemmesees 89
-SOS ese em oZ NNN NNNNNNNNNNNN NNN
%%N NN
-- 000 000000000000 (55 ($$
kN See ese ec NNN NV 8W
%%,%, %,%%,% NN NN,
-E nns
~~n. n s 6~~
t non e e e e e a e e e e e e 0 0 0.-
C. O O.
W MMM NNNNNNNNNNNN g
NN ee
==
e mee seeeeeeeeee.
EOS ESUSEDSSESSS ese See e3
^
em E
,= o NN O
zE NNNNNNNNNNNN 6
-w m
mNmmu u
m m w
Ox one enonconennen om e m e. ese me M
7W zhJ! E22 EEE.EEEEEe$ie Ee eEE seE SE
,u, m,,N,m,,,m,,
m.=
n m
u e m gg
.g on W
e COO
- m mmmm w
m.m u
6 999 999999999999 Nn 900- 900 e,
6 M
3' 3
~~3. -~~
o.
3 3
3 3a=.
p
=>
saw w
. W a-a
=

3 3 a.
ee 3L 3 Z aO w-3
=
=
a.
2-8E W
W 3
E
. W
- _=-
W o
2
-.==
..- J w
J---
A-Z<.
'gwE ggge 3
m-O wS bb WWWk Wbbeh~ N k b W k ZE Z
E.<.
.bw>EAD
.J.J,.J M
.J e.= O'E..J N-06
.J W
E
-O eee-O sE Z
<< k
-===
_ JJ J
- E E
- E -
.J
>= =.J M E E,- >=
E-EW
L
~~E E - -. E.J J O ##~~
Z ZZ Z
^
OO EW kE A L E
>EL b L o E E
.J EmJ
.J L
.J.J
> = > =
0-0 J EW JJEE-JJ E
E k
Jk EL E
'. 6 LE6
~~k O D E.J - O EZh=~~
-O
. b W
ZW Z L
--=
E A6O E6 EE EA k
k LZ A k &
L
=
25 h
E ZZzEEzkb E
52 EBE Z
Z Z
E Z
. < k OL O
O A
kh k
LA <
k EE 6
kkk O6gZ
'E 08 z8
=
=
k zz
'z i
i
==
z
==
zzz8 88 O
= W O
< o O O<
=
>D o
o J
o 8>
<>.E J
L.J 3
W-W J,
8Z e-WW W
WWMW W
W W
WWW.=
. W,. J -
W
- - > =
-W
-W
=
E
( Z. 4
<<<3 (3
<< 0 EC
(
JZOEO (3-0 W,=
,= -
W J-W2< dJ.
J00...
..a O<.
E..
WN==-
k-kh>>>>>->F
.ooooooooooookE mt E<><><
EEEZ(
> TEE NN OL u --
- EEm m
.i,_
---m
- = -
9 r
s
~
STATUS.0F OFF-SITE PLANS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOT YET LICENSED PAGE C3 NRC FORMAL JOINT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE CTATE
. PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMIS$1CN EXERCISE MEETING HEADOTRS.
DATE F I NDI NG - ' FINDING DATE DATE (UC)
TN GREENE CO PLAN FOR PtilPPS BEND (UC)
TN SULLIVAN CO PLAN FOR PHIPPS BEND (UC)
VA 3 TATE PLAN FOR PHIPPS BEND (UC3 e s
f LA STATE PLAN FOR RIVER BEND (UC) a 5/ O/82
'8/ O/82 8/ 0/82 7/ O/82 11/29/82 11/29/82 11/29/82 4/ O/83 10/ O/83 LA WEST FELICI ANA PLAN FOR RIVEft -BEND 5/ O/82 8/ O/82 8/ O/82 7/ O/82 (UC)
LA EAST FELICIANA PLAN FOR RIVER BEND' 5/ O/82 8/ O/82 8/ O/82 7/ O/82 (DC)
LA POINTE COUPE PLAN FOR RIVER BEND 5/ O/82 8/ O/82 8/ O/82' 7/ O/82 (UC)
~
LA-EAST BATON ROUSE PLAN FOR RIVER 5/ O/82 8/ 0/82 8/ O/82 7/ 0/82 BEND (UC)
LA WEST BATON ROUSE PLAN FOR RIVER
^ 5/ O/82 8/ O/82
8/ O/82 7/ O/82 BEND (UC)
MS STATE PLAN FOR RIVER BEND (UC) e e
FL STATE PLAN FOR ST LUCIE (U) s 4/ l/82 2/11/82 2/10/82e 5/ 1/82 4/ I/82 3/15/82-8/ 1/82P 90/ O/62 FL ST LUCIE CO PLAN FOR ST LUCIE (U) 4/ 1/82 2/11/82 2/10/82: 5/ I/82 FL MARTIN CO PLAN FOR ST LUCIE (U) 4/ 1/82 2/11/82 2/10/828 5/ l/82 l
l CA STATE PLAN FOR SAN ONOFRE (U) a 7/15/82 5/13/81
'5/18/81 '9/15/82 11/20/81 12/ 1/81 10/15/82P 8/25/81 3/ O/8k-j CA ORANGE CO PLAN FOR SAN ONOFRE (U).
'7/15/82 5/13/81 E/18/81' 9/15/82 l
CA SAN DIEGO CO PLAN FOR SAN ONOFRE 7/15/82 5/13/81 5/18/81' 9/15/82 (u) i CA SAN JUAN CPASTO PLAN FOR SAN 7/95/82 5/13/81. 5/18/81 9/15/82 i
ONOFRE (U)
CA CAMP PENDLETON PLAN FOR SAN ONOFRE 7/l5/82 5/13/81 5/18/81 9/15/82 (U)
CA SAN CLEMEN1E PLAN FOR SAN ONOFRE 7/15/02 5/13/81 5/18/81 9/15/82 (U) l I
i MA STATE PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) +
10/30/82 10/30/82 3/ 0/83 11/ O/83 MA ESSEX CO PLAN FOR SEABROOK-(UC) +
MA AMES8URY PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MA MERRIMAC PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) l MA NEE 8ERRY PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MA NEWBURYPORT PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MA HAVERNILL PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MA SALIS8URY PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MA WEST NEWBURY PLAN FOR SEABROOK (t/C)
ME STATE PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) #
NH STATE PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) a +
10/30/82 10/30/82 3/ O/83 II/ O/83 j
NH ROCKIHGHAM CO PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) +
l I
I l
l 1
e
~.
PAGE 34 STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOT YET LICENSED NRC FORMAL JolMT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM FINAL HEARING LICENSE CTATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADQTRS.
DAT5*
FINDING FINDING DATE DATE f
MH E. KENSINGTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MH EXETER PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
NH OREENLAND PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MH hAMPTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MH HAMPTON FALLS PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
HH KENSINGTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (DC) l NH KINSTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
NH-NEWTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
NH NORTH HAMPTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MH PORTSMOUTH PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
~
NH RYE PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
NH SEABROOK PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC)
MH STRATHAM PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) l NH BRENTWOOD PLAN FOR SEA 8 ROOK (UC) i NH SOUTH HAMPTON PLAN FOR SEABROOK (UC) 0 1
a 3/15/82-8/18/82 7/ 7/82 8/ 8/62 12/ t/81 4/- 1/82 ' 9/ 8/82P 3/ O/82-9/ O/82 CT STATE PLAN FOR SHOREHAM (UC) e NY STATE PLAN FOR SHOREHAM (UC)
NY SUFFOLK CO PLAN FOR SHOREHAM (UC) 3/15/82-8/18/82 7/ 7/82 8/ 8/82 TX STATE PLAN FOR 80. TEXAS (UC) e 4/ O/83 5/ O/83 5/ O/83 7/ t/83 8/ 1/83 8/ t/83 8/ 1/83P 1/ O/84 7/ O/84 i
TX MATAGORDA CO PLAN FOR 50. TEXAS 4/ O/83 5/ O/83 5/ O/83 7/ t/83 l
(UC)
I 4/ 8/81 11/ O/82 4/30/81 7/31/81 8/ 1/81. 8/ t/81 11/13/81 8/22/81 5/ O/82 SC STATE PLAN FOR SUMMER (UC)
'4 SC FAIRFIELD CO PLAN FOR SumER (UC) 4/ 8/88 II/ O/82 4/30/88 7/31/81 11/13/89 SC NEWBERRY CO PLAN FOR SUMMER (UC) 4/ 8/81 11/ O/82 4/30/81 7/31/81 11/13/88 SC LEXINGTON CO PLAN FOR SUMER (UC) 4/ 8/8I II/ O/82 4/30/81 7/31/81 11/I3/81 l
SC RICHLAND CO PLAN FOR SUM ER (UC) 4/ 8/88 II/ O/82 4/30/81 7/31/81 11/13/81 PA STATE PLAN FOR SUSOUEHANNA (UC) a 5/ 3/82 3/18/82-5/15/82 8/ t/82 10/ 1/81 3/15/82-7/ t/82P IO/ 8/88 5/ O/82 I
PA LUZERNE CO PLAN FOR SUSQUCHANNA (V 3/82 3/18/82-5/15/82 8/ 1/82 (UC)
PA COLUM81A CO PLAN FOR SUSQUEHANNA 5/ 3/82 3/18/82-5.'45/82 8/ t/82 (UC) e SA STATE PLAN FOR VOOTLE (UC) a+
GA BURKE CO PLAN FOR VOOTLE (UC) l SC STATE PLAN FOR VOOTLE (UC) +
SC BARNWELL CO PLAN FOR VOOTLE (UC) i SC AIKEN CO PLAN FOR VOOTLE (UC) w-- - - -
,-w
-e-w
-n---
-we
.,-.---~~~,,-e-
~-
w-wn-
---~s- - - - -
--e
- - - - - - - - -. - ~
6 e
STATUS OF OFF-SITE PLANS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOT YET LICENSED PAGE 35 NRC FORMAL JolMT PUBLIC READY FOR REQUESTED INTERIM. FINAL HEARING LICENSE STATE PLAN IDENTIFICATION SUBMISSION EXERCISE MEETING HEADOTRS.
DATE FINDING FINOING DATE DATE
(
WA STATE PLAN FOR WPPSS 3.5 (UC) e WA SRAYS HARSOR CO PLAN FOR WPPSS 3.5 (UC)
OR STATE PLAN FOR WPPSS 1.2 4 (UC) e WA STATE PLAN FOR WPPSS 1.2 4 (UC) e 9/13/82 II/ 1/82-11/ l/82 11/ 1/82 12/ l/82P 7/ O/82 WA BENTON-FRie(LM CO PLAN FOR WPPSS 1 2.4 (UC)
LA STATE PLAN FOR WATERFORD (UC).e 11/25/81 8/ O/82 8/ O/82 8/20/82 2/15/82s 9/20/82P 3/23/82 11/ O/82 LA ST CHARLES PLAN FOR WATERFORD (UC) 11/25/81 8/ O/82 8/ O/82 8/20/82 LA ST JOP90 PLAN FOR WATERFORD (UC) 11/25/81 8/ O/82 8/ O/82 8/20/82 SA STATE PLAN FSH isATTS BAR (UC) e
~7/ 1/82 7/ I/82 7/ I/82P 7/ O/82 l
A e
1/ 1/82: 8/ 9/82 4/ 5/82 8/ t/82 l
TN STATE PLAN FOR WATTS B'R (UC) 1/ I/828 8/ 9/82 4/ 5/82 8/ I/82 I
l TM RHEA CO PLAN FOR WATTS BAR (DC).
1/ 1/82s. 8/ 9/82 4/ 5/82 8/ t/82 TN MCMINN CO PLAN FOR WATTS BAR (UC)'
TN MEIGS CO PLAN FOR WATTS BAR (UC) 1/ 1/82e 8/ 9/82 4/ 5/82 8/ I/82 TN ROANE CO PLAN FOR WATTS BAR (UC) 1/ 1/82: 8/ 9/82 4/ 5/82-8/ I/82 2/ O/83P 10/ O/82 4/ O/83 8/.0/82 1/ C/83 5/30/82-5/30/82 12/ O/02.'ll/.0/82
,j K9~ STATE PLAN FOR WOLF CREEK-(UC)
=
KO. COFFEY CO PLAN FOR WOLF CREEK (UC) 12/ O/82 11/.0/82 8/ O/82 1/ O/83
..-l' KS ANDERSON CO PLAN FOR. WOLF CREEK (UC) 11/ 1/83'
~AL.cSTATEPLANF6R'YEl.LdW*t$RK'(UC)
~
I
+
~~1 AL LAUDERDALE CO PLAN FOR, YELLOW~~
, I'I/ -l /83,
s CREEK (UC)-
.I AL COLSERT CO PLAN *FOR YELL (Mi CREEK.
11/ 1/83 '
(UC) s MS STATE PLAN FOR YELLW CRK (UC) e +
MS' TISHOMIN80 CO PLAN'FOR YELLOW' CREEK (UC) l TN STATE Pl..N FOR YELLOW CRK (UC) +
S/ 1/85 2/.1/85 1/ 1/85 7/15/05 8/15/05P l
TN HARDIN CO PLAN FOR YELLOW CREEK 5/ 1/85 2/ I/85 1/ I/85, 7/l5/85 (UC)
EN" STATE PLAN FOR ZIP 99ER. (UC) e
. 11/18/81 5/21/82 10/ -1/81 1/22/82 8/21/82P 1/25/82 7/.0/82
+-
3/12/82-11/18/81
. E' KY' STATE PLAN FOR ZIMMER (UC)
'3/12/82-11/18/81 11/18/81 5/21/82 i'
KY'. BRACKEN CO PLAN FOR ZIP 99ER (UC)
KY PENDLETON CO PLAN FOR ZIMMER (UC) 3/12/82-II/18/8t' 31/18/8I-5/21/82 KY CAMPSELL CO PLAN FOR ZIP 99ER '(UC)
~3/12/02-11/18/81 11/18/81 5/21/82 ON. STATE, PLAN FOR ZIP 99ER (UC) s' + ~
3/12/82-11/18/81 'll/18/88 5/21/82 10/ l/88 1/22/82 8/21/82P 1/25/82 7/ O/82 OH. CLERMONT' CO PLAN-FOR 2tP99ER (UC)
'3/12/82 11/18/81 11/18/81 5/21/82
.i
W NN N
N N
N' N
N N
N NN N
N N
N N
N N
eM e
e OW ed te td W
O (J
te 49 te W 44 0
44 89 W
H td E
N N
WW OO O
O O
O O
O O
O 00 0
-0 0
0 O
O O
u>
.J O NN O
p p
p e
e P=
b bb 9
m O
O O
==
e
=
w e
e N
N a
NN N
N N
==
e ee e
e G
e e
e O
G
==
N
.=
N N
N 2
e e : e e
Dp C
O O
N O
M W
N
==
O EW p
O N
e NN N
N NN N
O O
=
M M
p N.=
L O
e
==
e O
=.
LL L
L L
L L
L LL L
L L
L L
L L
N N
e N
N NN N
N n
a N
n N
Z ee e
e e
e e
e e
e ee e
e e
e S
e e
e NN N
N
==
.J -
N N%
N N
N N
N e
O O
==
9 O
b.=
T
.=
. - = =
N
.e NN e
M
==
<O Oe
.C-
==
NN N
N N
N N
N NN N
=
N E.= Z.
66 bM C
O N
O e
N N
ee e
e O
4 W
T e
e e
e e
NN
==
==
==
N N
.=
N N
NN N
N N
N N.
N N
e e e
k
-2 ee e
e e
e e
e e
e ee e
e e
e e
e e
W E. S N'
N g-NN N
%.=
NN e
p
=
0 m
a O
WD==
=
9
==
0 e
N
=
=
NN N
w N
.=
>2 N
=
e Z
%N N
N
%.= %
2
== la.
O O
==
O
==
b a
T N
N O
O N
==
oO N.
N.=
.=
W W
w.=.
=
N N
==
N
=
N N
M
=
E D
,=
Se e
e e
e O
e e
e SS e
e e
.e.
e
.U 0.%
N
%N N
N N
N.
.=
=
= **
=
O b
M
=
.J E - 0O O
N N
N N
g < -.=
N<
e T
N O
N O %%
-.O=
b O
.=
.O.
.=
9 Z
W
. - = =
=
.=
g
.= =
=
N N
N N
NN N
N O
n N
n N
s O
EE ee ** e
~~e e~~
e e
e e
e ee e
e e
e e
e e
NN N
.N NN N
N N
N W
k NN N
e O
O O
O P.*
>0 Ce o
e
=
==
e O
=
. - = =
N O
OO N
==
=
M
.=
N NN
.'N N.
.N S
N N
0 b
e N
e op p
e N
%N WN O
g y
N O
O N
-.=
N N
.N N
N N
N'
- =-
e e
e e
e ee e
e
~S e
~~e e~~
e O
OE'NN N
N
.N N
e W-
~~e e~~
4 O
e Pm O
O
~~O O~~
O O
.O O
T p
.e e
.= **
NO
.e b.=
N N.=
n N
N.'
N-N N
N N
NN E
.J - N
=
8 P
T
==
N b
e W
eW
% %.=
0
.N O
3W O T
C N.
N.
.- w LE== w g
N N
N g
W
.=
N N
N N
N N
. = = =
N N'
N
.O
. Se e
e e
e e
e et e
Se e
e e
e e
8 8
Z W
N%
N e
N O
O C
.=
-.e e.=
O e
e
. =,.
N e
O
.e
.T O
>= 0,TT
.n
=
=
. N.=
N
=
==
W Zg
%.= %
N e
N N
S e
%.=
== W %%
G T
N O
e
. =. =
=
O 3C * =. =
e
.=
=
e
==
.=
7 lal '
. = = =
=
.J e
e e e*
==.
O N
.4 N N
N-N N
N M
2 e
Z
.J== 8e e
e e
e e
e e
ee e
e e
e e
e e
O *= =
N N
==
N N%
N N
O.=
p.
NN e
a O
O M.
p O
e S
==
0 N
==
=
=
=
S O
eN%
N N
N
=
.=
=
b b
T e
O w
OO T
C 9
T 4
= * -
. =.
W 6
. 9.N-
.=
e e
a e
L
+-
a a
om O
+~
a n
.m U
U
+
a n
U n.
~~a 3~~
m o
o 3
a 3
as '
3 c.a.
=.
3 o
3o 3
3 m
w a
w O
+ e
.=
.=
w 3
3 m
O*
O
=
w
.3 3
3 a
w3
=
w
=.
o.
m.
T w
L w
.W Z
c 3
3 oo
=.
E 33 0
e' A -
N.
z L
E 3
=
w' O
.J g
d W
.=
a w
w 3
ww tal
.=
C Inf 4.:
8
.=
~~0-O E~~
.J
.E EE 3-E.
. 5 a
0 W
a 2
E a
E t
a s
o.
,=
W 5
8..
O
.J 3
NN m
U L
3 3.'E'E E.
E E
E.
E '.' E. E.
E.
EE.
E.
E E.
E E
E-E..'
m m
s l 3,2 I I
..I..
. L 2 2
2 2. :2 222' 2
2 22 2
~
w w
w w
w w
w ww w
w w
w w
w.
,=
ww r
,=
,=
,=
.=
e e
8 W
5 NE E
I k
N N
'N b
p 3
L
==
c
,.b = ;--. -.. =
- = =.,.. -
-=.
=,,,
.=..
.a
W e
Q n
n.
n en a
nn "T
g U
(9 O
W
. Le (J O O
O Le N
N N
N N
N NN WW O O
O O
O 00 O
DO O
UM
-(
NN JO =
4 T
C b
ee O
-=
b Ne S
N N
N N
N ne n
en v
Z e
e e
e e
se e
se e
W N
N N
N NN NN N
O EW O O
O O
O DO O
00 O
(
W(
N NN N
(>
L ZG e e
O
=
=
NN nn
=
L L
L L.
L n
n n
n N
n e
e e
e e
e J-N N
N N
N N
40 0 O
O ZZ e
O N
66 4 W
N
=
L e
W
_EE N N
N N
N NN N
NN n
e e
e e
e ce e
me e
>4 E-s s
N s
Ns N
NN N
O WO e N
O O
00 00
=
>Z N
e n
en N
nn f
Z=
.N N
N N
N N N.
-w n
s
~
CO e
E O
W W
N N
N N
N
'NN N
NN n
U e
e e
e e
me e
ne 8
OMW %
N NN NN N
J E > e O
O O
O C0 N.
00 Z
(
N n
n n
n nn N
nn 0
N NN N
NN N
Z n
n e
g 00 e
2 n n n
n n
N n
D mg e e
e e
e e
W N
N
>O O
0 0
0
=
U 0D n
W
((
N N
N k
Wg n 9
=
O b
b
~
N N
N n
NN N
n-6 O e e
e e
se e
e O
OZ N
N N
N 0
0 0
0 0C O
O K
J>
W %
N N
N N.
N g
y
.O.
e e
n e
2 W N N
N n
NN N
n n e e
e e
ee e
e
-N N
O WU O O
O O
DO O
O W
ZK
-W N
N M
Ox 0 e
=.
n 9
9 O
SW =
=
J Z
n O n n
N n
N n-Z J-e e
e e
e e
n n O p
O O
O O
r
- N N
N N
N.
N, W
m N
e
(
>a b
B 8
8 8
-4 8
8 88 g
g g-g.
g
=
2 Z
0
((
> 0 o
Z W
4 >
E 0 E E
(4 W
s a
5 E
d 6
((
-E E
ou E
5 E
E E
E EE E
EE E
Em m
w w
w wm w
mm m
Z E
Z Z
Z Z
ZZ Z
A L
W W
W W
WW W
WW
(
(
(
(
(
(4 4
44 4
9 O
n R9 R
GR g
E l
. -.i
i o
' PART II TAP.J II STATUS OF EFFORTS TO OBTAIN PLANS IN SUPPORT OF PLANTS LICENSED TO OPERATE (Response to question 1.f.)
The first column in' Table I on pages 19 through 28 lists the date of formal submission of offsite emergency preparedness plans in support of plants licensed to operate.
Dates in -the future have been. projected based upon information provided by the FEMA Regions as a result of their, intimate knowledge of the State and local situation.. All' plans h' ave been received informally in draft and are being reviewed by the FEMA Regional Assistance Committees.
A joint exercise will be completed not later than April 1,1982, except for those sites noted t
below.
PEACM BOTTOM (PA)
By letter to NRC dated August 19, 1981, the Philadelphia Electric Company requested a two to three month extension for the Peach Bottom full-scale emergency plan exercise as required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix E.
After considering the impact of the requested extension on the state of emergency preparedness at Peach Bottom, NRC Headquarters determined that the request was. acceptable and authorized the licensee to conduct the exercise no later than mid June, 1982.
Th'e' State of Pennsylvania is completing. the final draft' of their plans site-specific to Peach Bottom and is projecting submission to FEMA Region III on April 1, 1982.
They project formal submission of their plans on May 22, 1982.
The State, in conjunction with the Utility, has scheduled the exercise for June 16, 1982.
In Pennsylvania', development of the Peach Bottom plans had a lower priority than the development of plans and the conduct of exercises for Susquehanna, Beaver Valley, and TMI.
State staff limitations are such that they cannot improve on this schedule. FEMA Region 'III has been in contact with officials from the~ State of Pennsylvania and will continue working with the State.
FITZPATRICK (NY)
The State and local offsite emergency plans aere developed in draft and submitted
.'~
to FEMA Region II on June 25., 1981.
The plans were formally sumitted to FEMA Rcgion II on July 22, ~19 8,1. - Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) review comments have been furnished to the State. Offsite emergency preparedness was evaluated at the Nine Mile Point exercise conducted September. 15, 1981.
An exercise evaluation report on offsite caergency preparedness was provided to NRC on December 4,1981.
a NRC has granted an extension to t'he Fitzpatrick facility, consistent with their proposed rule revision that -would al, low sites where loca1' government is impacted by two facilities to exercise one before April 1,1982, and the other prior to September 1,1982.
The exercise has tentatively been scheduled for July 28 and 29, 1982.
i t
RANCHO SECD (CA)
On September 24,198i, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), the equnties of Amador, Sacramento, and San Joaquin, and the State of California established March 17, 1982, as a tentative date for the joint exercise.
Howeve r, at the December 9,1981, morning meeting of the Rancho Seco Emergency Planning Team, it was recommended that June 23, 1982, be designated as the exercise date for the Rancho Seco Emergency Plan.
The delay to June 23, 1982, was required to ensure adequate time to complete the offsite plans and training which is a prerequisite to the exercise.
The Joint Powers Authority board of Directors' meeting the afternoon of December 9,1981,' concurred with the recommended date change. On January 18, 1982, by letter to NRC the Assistant General Manager of SMUD requested an exemption to the rhquireme' nts to hold a full-scale exercise prior to April 1,1982.
State and local plans are in various stages of completion.
Final drafts of all offsite plans are now scheduled for submission to FEMA Region IY on March 15, 1982.
The plans will be reviewed prior to the exercise now schedulsd to be held June 23, 1982.
O e
i e
O h
e O
4 e
PA,RT 'II:
TABLE III CAUSE OF DELAYS AN MEASURESTHATDANBE'ORAREBEINGTAKENTOREDUCE l
DELAYS IN RECEIPT OF PLANS WHICH.ARE IMPACTING THE LICENSING PROCESS (Response to question 3.g.)
Sites involved are:
Byron, Callaway,'Clinton, Ccmanche Peak, fermi, Midland,
~
Palo Verde, Perry, Shoreham, Susquehanna, and Waterford.
l
~
BYRON (IL)
Plans are required for the threel counties of Ogle, Stephenson, and Winnebago in addition to the State of Illinois site-specific plan.- The State's practice has b'een to do the site-specific planning in conjunction with the political subdivisions.
State involvement in the planning and subsequent drills and j
training has taken about lseven months lfor each of the sites.
Illinois, in i
general, has a myriad of problems beyond their 'already heavy schedule.
There is a State hiring freeze.
The freeze plus the preclus' ion of State employees currently on board from being utilized' for, REP planning complicate the accom-plishment of.the State workload.. Resources 're stretched thin by the planning a
efforts to date, the number of plants operating and under construction, and related plan updating,' site-specific drills,. training, and exercising.
The scheduling of. planning in regard to Byron has only begun to be addressed by the State.
No actual planning has been started.- This is further complicated because of the interrelated REP activities of FEMA Region V and the other six States involved in this program. FEMA Region V has been in contact with the i
State of Illinois and will continue working. with the State and press for accelerating progress in planning for t_he Byron site,.
s CALLAWAY (MO)
Plans are required for the four counties of Callaway, Montgomery, Gasconade, and Osage, in. addition to the State of Missouri site-specific p.lan.
Two plans j
have been developad, nanely the State plan entitled the " Missouri Nuclear i
Accident Plan" and the "Callaway Offsite Emergency Response Plan," a combined plan for the four counties.
These plans, completed in draft and submitted on j
October 15, 1981, are still in rudimentary form and fall short of complying I
wi.th NUREG 0654/ FEMA REP-1.
However, Regional RAC scr' ening was completed in a
December and an interim finding on the plans alone is scheduled to be furnished to NRC on February 15, 1982.
An exercise is not scheduled until December 1982.
j i
l
)-
CLINTON-(IL)
Plans are required for the fou'r coun' ties of DeWitt, Macon, McLean, and Pratt, in addition to the State of Illinois site-specific plan.
The discussion listed under Byron (see above) is also applicable to the Clinton site.
The scheduling D
of planning in rega:d to Clinton has only begun to be addressed by the State.
No actual planning has been started, except for an initial meeting with the Clinton Utility at which time a fuel loading date of October 1982 was projected 1
as the earliest possible date.
According to the Utility, this was likely.
to slip.
Completion of construction is now projected for January 1983.
FEMA' i
i Ragion V has been in contact with the State of Illinois and will continue to,
l work with the. State and press for accelerating progress in planning 'for the Clinton site,.
CDMANCHE' PEAK (TX)
Plans are required for the two counties of Hood and Somervell in addition to the State of Texas.si,te-specific plan. A meeting was conducted on July 10, 1981, with FEMA, memb'ers of the RAC, the State, and the Utility.
The Utility again verified that its plans called for fueling of this facility in early 1983 and again expressed to the State that the projected date for completion of its j
plan and the joint exercise on or about July 1,1982, was adequate to meet its licensing requirement.
FEMA Region VI reminded participants at the meeting of the NRC imposed dates for hearings and licensing.
The Utility indicated that they were unaware of the scheduled hearing dates and indicated that NRC repre-sentatives had informally been made aware of the 1983 planned fueling date, although for its own' reasons ha.d not made these dates public.
However, by letter dated October 29, 1981, to NRC, the Utility did advise NRC that their revised estimated fuel load date is June 1983.
However, the Dallas Morning.
News on October 27, 1981, reported that company officials said on October 26, 1981, that t,he first reactor would be completed in 1984 and the second in' 1985.
This is the fifth time that the anticipated completion date has been pushed back.
As a result, FEMA sees no need to meet a November 1,1981, deadline for an interim finding on the State plans.
It appears the State's schedule for plan development is adequate to meet the Utility's requirements.
Any change from this schedule will require additional directives from NRC to the Utility, which.
could then result in additional Utility / State negotiations.
FEMA Region VI has been in contact with the State of Texas, but the Health Department is unwilling to accelerate development of plans beyond the dates discussed above.
1 FERMI (MI)-
Plans are required for the counties of Monroe and Wayne and the State of Michigan site-specific plan.
The 10 mile emergency planning zone extends about 1 mile into the Canadian province of Ontario. -FEMA Region V has beerr in contact with the State of Michigan.
The Michigan State level plan is complete except for the need to make minor adjustments to incorporate site-specific modifications.
The site-specific plans were completed November 19, 1981.
Planning is complex due to international as well as local political subdivirions and high density population within the Plume EPZ and the ingestion zone.
A joint exercise will be held February 2, 1982.
Regional RAC ieviews were completed January 19, 1982.
A public meeting will be held February 3, 1982.
Formal submission is projected for April 16, 1982.
Based upon the above, FEMA will provide a supplemental intarim finding of the plans and the exercise to the NRC by March 15, 1982.
MIDLAND (MI)
Plans are required for the three counties of Midland, Bay, and Saginaw in addition to the State of Michigan site-specific plan.
Site specific plans are about 80%
complete.
Planning is complex due to high density population within the plume EPZ and the ingestion zone. The State's economic cutback involves work reduction programs, a freeze on hiring, and mandatory lay-off days without pay (September 25, 1981, was the sixth and final unpaid day off in fiscal year 1981) for State employees.
Three more unpaid lay-off days have been projected during the first six months of fiscal year 1982; however, it has not been decided if they will be ordered by the Governor.
The direct. effects on the State of Michigan REP planning effort has been a loss of 6 State Emergency Services Division. employees and 2 field representatives *, resulting in reassignment of workload and les's manpower now available for REP work.
FEMA Re.gion Y has been in contact with the State of Michigan and will continue to work with the State and press for accelerating progress in this planning effort. -
~~i. iia i ii~~
PALO VERDE-(AZ) i Plans are required fbr the county c* Maricopa in addition to the State of Arizona site-specific plan.
Region IX expects to receive a copy of the draft plans for their review by February 10, 1982. Provided the draft plans are delivered as currently scheduled, an interim finding based on the plans review l
only is scheduled to be provided to NRC by March 15, 1982, approximately 60 days prior to the current projected date for the start of hearings.
PERRY (OH)
Plans are required for the three counties of Ashtabula, Geauga, and Lake in addition to the State of Ohio site-specific plan.
An engineering consulting l
company is under contract to develop the REP plans for Ashtabula and Geauga Counties.
Lake County has not selected a contractor.
This could result in 'a major delay.
FEMA Region V has been in contact with the State of Ohio and will continue to work with the State and press for accelerating progress in planning for the Perry site.
i SHOREHAM (NY)
Plans are required for the County of Suffolk in addition to the State of New York site-specific plan. Development of plans for Shoreham has had a lower priority than the development of plans for other sites in the State of New York.
The joint exercise has been delayed by the Utility and the' State and is j
currently scheduled for June 16, 1982.
Therefore, the interim finding by FEMA scheduled to NRC by' April 1,1982, will be based upon a. review of the plans l
only.
The public meeting has been scheduled for July 7,1982.
The State has f
scheduled femal submission of their pT.ans for March 15, 1982.
A draft of i
l the plan will not be available prior to the formal submission.
[
SUSQUEHANNA (PA)
\\
Plans are required for the two counties of Luzerne and Columbia in addition to the State of Pennsylvania site-specific plan.
The State level site-specific plan for Susquehanna will be very similiar to the State level site-specific plan for Three Mile Island.
The Three Mile Island site-specific State level p1'an has been reviewed by the RAC and is scheduled for formal submission on May 3, 1982.
The draft State level site specific plan for Susquehanna has been i
delayed. When delivered, it is expected to be in very good shape.
The two county plans have been received and FEMA Region III has used these plans to answer contentions for the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ( ASLB) in accordance with the. FEMA /NRC Memorandum of Understanding. FEMA Regional testimony before -
the ASLB on offsite emergency preparedness regarding the Susquehanna facility was concluded on October 22, 1981.
The Regional Assistance Committee (RAC)
'l review of the county plans has been completed.
FEMA is' scheduled to provide NRC an updated interim finding by March 15, 1982.
4 e
u WATERFORD (LA)
Plans are required for the two parishes of St. Cherles and St. John in addition to the State of Louisiana site-specific plan. Of fsite plans for the Waterford facility were provided by Louisiana on November 25,1981, (approximately one month late) for review by the Regional Assistance Committee (RAC).
A RAC review was completed in January 1982.
The State of Louisiana has also developed a State plan site-specific for the~ Grand Gulf facility in Mississippi whose 10.
mile EPZ includes Tensas Parish in Louisiana.
An interim finding is scheduled to be provided to NRC by February 15, 1982, which preceeds the hearing scheduled for March 1982.
e 8
e e
'5 k
en O
e 9
8 9
0 4
I i
PART II
= Table IV i
~~SUMMARY~~
OF FEMA STAFF EFFORT' ASSIGNED TO THE REP ACTIVITY
~
(Response to i;uestion No. 4) l REPORTING PERIOD:
January 1, 1982, through January 31, 1982.
Location Number of person months
~~1 3.50 Region Regi$n 2~~
8.50 3
4.50 Region 4
5.62 Region 5
11.60 Region 6
2.65 Region 7
2.00 Region 8
,94 Region 9
4.40 Region 10 2.29 -
Region He adqua' ters 18.50 r
Total,
64.50-l
~~These are " Equivalent" staff levels since the REP program draws on staff members from other progrens on a task related basis.~~
{
e G
e w,
bp PART II TABLE Y t
INSTANCES OF FEDERAL AGENCIES PROVIDING LESS THAN FULL SUPPORT TO RAC REVIEWS OF PLANS AND PREPAREDNESS (Response to question No. 5) i R-2 RAC comments from all Federal agencies have now been received on the State of New York Plan and the site-specific county plans for Orange, Putnam, Rockland,' and.Westchester.
HHS/PHS has indicated that because of a reduction in staff they will not participate in the Indian Point exercise on March 3,1982.
In addition, the following RAC members -- HHS/PHS, EPA, and FDA -- will not participate in the Oyster Creek exercise scheduled for March 16, 1982.
R-4 HHS supported the RAC IV revi;w of the South ' arolina and Florida REP plans.
C However, exercise support for the remainder of FY-82 is still undetermined.
FDA will provide exercise observers for the St. Lucie exercise in February.-
Other HHS agencies will not support the St. Lucie exercise.
R-8 DOE and USDA Regional Assistance Committee members have not participated in RAC' business in some time and do not plan to participat'e at the Forward Command Post briefing scheduled for February 17, 1982.
R-9.
Cooperation by Regional RAC member Federal agencies continues to be R-10 outstanding.
s
~~SUMMARY~~
Regional Assistance Committee participation by other Federal agency representatives, which had improved significantly in plan review and exercise observation during the last part of fiscal year 1981 is varying during FY B2 and threatened by staff reductions and budget limitations in some Federal agencies.
e em o
4 4
4 o
n -
,,--.-.-,,n,
--r e
V s.
v.,
PART II TABLE VI INSTANCES OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVER$ MENT RELUCTANCE TO SUBMIT PLANS (Response to question No. 6)
FEMA has no formal documented record ' f a refusal by a State to submit plans.
o Previously we reported that six towns in New Hampshire in the Seabrook emergency planning zone had formally stated in writing to the State of New Hampshire that there was no way to safely evacuate the emergency planning zone, and that no town money would be spent on developing plans.
Towns were Rye, Kensington, Hampton, Hampton Falls, Seabrook, and South Hampton.
.The State has now passed new enabling legislation and the contract has been awarded for development of State and local plans.
Draft plans are expected in December 1982.
0 9
9 g
e e
0 0
h J
e O
4 4
S 9
.___._ _... v.
.r*-
i PART II TABLE VII INSTANLES OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MAKING PLANS CONTINGENT ON FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS OF THE UTILITY (Response to question No.7)
No significant change from last months report.
On April 2,1981, the St. Lucie Board of County Commissioners resolution #81-37 requested NRC & FEMA to require Florida Power & Light 'o pay costs of a bridge, sirens, a central communications center in a protected facility, a fire station on the Florida Power & Light property, and tests of the emergency plan.
To date, the County Commissioners position remains unchanged.
The State of Oregon has legislation which required Portland General Electric to finance of fsite preparedness.
The State of Washington has negotiated agreements / contracts to finance offsite preparedness with both commercial utilities operating in the State, namely the Washington Public Power Supply System and the Puget Sound Power and Light Co.
Cowlitz County has negotiated a separate agreement / contract with.the Portland General Electric Company.
Benton and Franklin Counties have att arrangement for financing various preparedness programs with the Washington Public Power Supply System.
Prcgress in the development of offsite plans would not have occurred if these agreements were not in place and gentinuing.
The Town of Monroe, Massachusetts with a population of 216 is 3/4 of a mile west of the Yankee Atomic Plant at Rowe, Massachusetts.
The Board of Selectmen consider their road network inadequate for evacuation and refused to approve the plans prepared by the State.
The town, by letter to FEMA dated June 10, 1961, requested FEMA to instruct Yankee, via the NRC, to provide them with funds to rebuild the roads.
The Massachusetts Civil Defense Agency inspected the area July 8, 1981, and, by letter dated July 22, 1981, advised the town of Monroe that they found the routes adequate.
The impasse continues since by letter dated August 17, 1981, the town of Monoroe documented their disagreement with the State position. FEMA Region I is currently investigating the situation and seeking a solution to it.
Last fall the Board of New Jersey Freeholders in Ocean County, New Jersey, disapproved a request by the Jersey Central Power and Light Company to have Ocean County accept ownership for the Alert and Notification System.
Ocean County has now agreed verbally to accept responsibility for the siren system.
The Board of Public Utilities received a blanket variance on December 17, 1981, 2
with the exception of.the Pinelands which is contingent upon approval by the Pinelands Commission.
The remaining problem to be resolved is the obtaining of the right-of-ways.
All equipment has.been received and installation is nearly complete.
9
]' ' h9( Federal Emergency Management Agency p
Washington, D.C. 20472 9
MAN 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Brian Grimes Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission FROM:
Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards
~~SUBJECT:~~
Interim Report - Status of New York State and Local Plans and Preparedness for Shoreham As required by the latest monthly report to Senator Simpson and in accordance with the joint Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (NRC/ FEMA) Memorandum of Understanding executed on November 4,1980, this is a status report on plans and preparedness in support of the Shorehen nuclear power facility.
FEMA Region II has not received the State site specific and the Suffolk County plans.
Therefore FEMA cannot comment on the adequancy of offsite plans or preparedness for the Shoreham site.
The State is scheduled to make a formal submission of its offsite plans and preparedness to Region II in accordanc's with the proposed FEMA Rule 44 CFR 350, by March 15, 1982.
The review of the offsite plans by the Regional Assistance Committee is scheduled for completion by April 15, 1982.
The joint exercise is scheduled for June 16, 1982.
Therefore FEMA intends to provide an interim finding, based upon a review of planc only as soon after April 15, 1982 as possible.
ATTACH'1ENT D
$ f
ATTAC}PtENT E STATUS OF STAFF REVIEW OF OPEN ITEMS SER or SSER Estimated Open Item Section Status Resolution Date 1.
Pool Dynamic loads 3.8.1, Awaiting further information April,1982 3.8.2 6.
Dow'ncomer Fatigue Analysis 3.9.2.1 Resolved pending confimation (12/81)1/
April, 1982 8.
Dynamic Qualification 3.10 Awaiting second audit (5/82)2/
June, 1982 9.
Environmental Qualification Awaiting audit (5/82)2,/
June, 1982
~~10. Seismic and LOCA Loadings 4.2.3.4 Resolved pending confinnation (7/82)3_/~~
~~September, 1982~~
~~11. Supplemental ECCS 4.2.3.3 Awaiting further infonnation (3/82)2/~~
April, 1982 Calculations with NUREG-0630 Model 15.
Inservice Testing of Pumps 5.2.2 Resolved February,1982 and Valves
~~19. Preservice Inspection 6.6 Resolved pending confirmation (6/82)3/~~
~~August, 1982~~
~~26. Suppression Pool Bypass 6.2.1.7 Staff Position June, 1982~~
~~28. Steam Condensation 6.2.1.8 Resolvedpendingconfirmation(12/81)1/~~
~~April,1982 Oscillation and Chugging Loads~~
~~32. Steam Condensation Sub-merged Drag Loads 6.2.1.8 Resolved pending confirmation (12/81)II April, 1982~~
~~36. Containment Purge System 6.2.3.1 Resolvedpendingconfirmation(1/82)1I April, 1982~~
~~39. Emergency Procedures 6.3.1, Awaiting LILCO submittal (4/82)2/~~
~~May, 1982 6.3.2~~
~~46. OIE Bulletin 79-27 7.5 Resolved pending confirmation (4/82)3,/~~
May, 1982
l SER or SSER Estimated Open Item Section Status Resolution Date
~~47. Control System Failures 7.7 Resolved pending confirmation (7/82)3_/~~
~~August, 1982~~
~~48. High Energy Line Breaks 7.7 Resolvedpendingconfirmation(4/82)1I May, 1982~~
~
~~52. Management Organization 13.1, 13.2, Under Review June, 1982 13.4, 13.5~~
~~53. Emergency Planning 13.3 Awaiting further information September,1982~~
~~57. TMI-2 Requirements:~~
Shift Technical Advisor I.A.1.1 Resolved with license condition April, 1982 Training Programs -
I.A.2.3 Resolved pending confinnation (8/82)1/
August, 1982 Operators Vendor Review of I.C.7 Resolved pending confirmation (7/82)3_/
August, 1982 Procedures Emergency Procedures I.C.8 Resolved pending confinnation (6/82)3_/
September, 1982 Control Room Design I.D.1 Resolved with license condition I May, 1982 4
Review Postaccident Sampling II.B.3 Resolved (Below 5% Power)
License Condition (Above 5% Power)
Relief & Safety Valves II.D.1 Resolved pending confirmation (12/81)1I May, 1982 Containment Isolation II.E.4.2 Resolved pending confinnation (7/82)3_/
August, 1982 Dependability Accident-Monitoring II.F.1 Instrumentation Resolved pending confirmation (6/82)3_/
August, 1982 Staffposition(4/82)2_/
May, 1982
. SER or SSER Estimated Open Item Section Status Resolution Date
~~57. TMI-2 Requirements:~~
Inadequate Core Cooling II.F.2 Awaiting further Information (7/82)2_/
August, 1982 IE Bulletins II.K.1 Item 5 Resolved pending confirmation September, 1982 Item 10 Resolved pending confinnation September,1982 Bulletins & Orders Task II.K.3 Force Item 13 Resolved pending confirmation (7/82)3_/
August, 1982 Item 16 Resolved pending confimation (3/81)3/
December,1982 Item 28 Awaiting further inforamtion (4/82)2/
May, 1982 Item 45 Resolved pending confimation July, 1982 Emergency Preparedness -
III.A.1.1 Awaiting further information April, 1982 Short Term Upgrade Emergency Support III.A.1.2 Under review May, 1982 Facilities Emergency Preparedness -
III.A.2 Awaiting further infonnation September,1982 Long Term Control Room Habitability III.D.3.4 Resolved pending confirmation (4/82)3_/
May, 1982
~~60. Station Blackout - Generic Resolved pending confirmation (6/82)3/~~
~~August, 1982 Letter 81-04~~
~~61. Scram System Piping 6.3.2 Awaiting further information (5/82)2/~~
September,1982 62.
Remote Shutdown System 7.4.3 Awaitingfurtherinformation(4/82)2_/
April, 1982
c
.. SER or SSER Estimated Open Item Section Status Resolution Date
~~63. Design Verification 1.7 (SSER-2)~~
Awaiting further information September,1982 l
l 1
Jf Confirmation has been submitted by LILCO on date given, but not yet verified by NRC Staff.
2/ Estimated date for the required action.
-3/ Estimated date for confirmation to be submitted by LILCO.
Verification by NRC Staff will follow.
4/ NRC Staff expects to require a license condition.
INSERT Page 54, Insert After Line 1295 Mr.' Dircks subsequently submitted' for the record the following information -
prepared by the NRC staff:
The January 1982 monthly status report to Mr. Bevill, Chairman, Subcommittee on E'nergy and Water Development, identifies thirty-three '
(33) nuclear power plants which are estimated by applicants to be completed by the end of CY El.
In response to your request, the NRC estimates that twenty-three (23) of the thirty-three (33) nuclear power plants will. be completed by the end of CY 83.
Please note that the dates contained herein are based on the NRC staff's estimate of the status of the plant at this time.
These dates are based on the assumption that (1) tha applicant's commitment to b'uild the facility stays at about 'tha same level, (2)' that the applicant makes no major efforts to accelerate plant completion, and (3). that no unforesee'n significant technical design or construction problems dev.elop.
A comparison between the NRC and applicant estimates of construction complet' ion dates for' all operating license applications is found.in.
Attachment.2 contains a discussion' of how the NRC estimated date for each plant was obtained..
The NRC has adopted the philoso'phy as part of the Recovery Plan to use the-spplicant's constr'uction completion date in the development of, licensing schedules.
e 9
ATTACHMENT F L_.
2-r The fiRC has requested the utilities to provide quarterly updates of the construction completion schedules for each facility until issuance of the Safety Evaluation Report (SER).
The fiRC estimates of construction completion dates are used to provide an independent verification of utility dates.
For most applicants, the NRC
~
estimates are derived from several sources through the NRR Project Manager.
The primary sources used are the Resident Inspector, Regional personnel, the NRR Project Manager, and NRC management.
For sc:ne cases (approximately twelve (12) per year), formal estimates by the Caseload 1
Forecast Panel (CFP) are required.
For construction completion estimates that are more than six mcnths apart, senior NRC management meets with utility representatives in order to I
reconcile the differences.
l I
k l
l l
e I
e
-e c
_ _ - - ~.
ATTACHMENT 1 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION DATES FOR OL APPLICANTS IN JANUAR' 1982 BEVILL REPORT l
APPLICANT NRC -
APPLICANT NRC i
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
~
PLANT NAME DATE DATE PLANT NAME DATE
.DATE
[
LaSalle 1 02/82 03/82 Clinton 1 01/83 08/839 Grand Gulf 03/82 07/82 McGuire 2 04/83 04/83Y San Onofre 2 01/82
.02/82 Watts Bar 06/83 Ol/84M'M l
Summer 1 02/82 04/82 Byron 1 04/83 10/83 Diablo Canyon'l 03/81 03/82 Wolf Creek 1 12/83 07/84U Diablo Canyon 2 07/82 12/82M Susquehanna 2 07/83 12/83F Susquehanna 1 07/82 08/82 Perry 1 05/83 12/83U LaSalle 2 01/83 01/83]
Midland 2 07/83 10/83 3
Watts Bar 1 08/82' 08/83y,2]
Catawba 1 08/83 02/84
~
'WNP-2 12/82 02/84U Bellefonte 1 09/83
'04/84 Zimmer 1 07/82 01/83 River 8end 1 04/85 Ol/86E
~
San Onofre 3 11/82 02/83_/
Seabrook 1 11/83
'i2/84U 3
Fenni 2
'07/82 02/84/
Palo Verde 2
'11/83 06/84 2
Shoreham,1 09/82 12/82 Comanche Peak 2 12/83 12/853/'N Cemanche Peak 1 06/83 12/83 Midland 1.
12/83 04/84 St. Lucie 2 10/82 10/82 South Texas 1 -
07/84 12/85M f
Callaway 06/83 12/83 Limerick 10/84
'10/84 l
! Palo Verde 1 11/82
'03/83 Harris 1 12/84 12/84 Waterford 3 10/82 10/82 Braidwood 1 04/85 12/85E ENRC revi.ew effort minimal if closely following recently licensed Sequoyah, Unit.s 1 & 2 (due to their design similarities).
' 2f C-utility management meeting scheduled to resolve large differences in construction NR completion dates.
3/ Review effort mainly. completed in connectiion with review of previous unit.
$/ aseload Forecast Panel site visit scheduled for CY 82 to review large differences C
in construction completion dates.
MCaseload Forecast Panel site visit to be scheduled for CY 83 if large differences in construction completion dates remain.
ATTACHMENT 2 All NRC estimates of construction completion dates were derived, as discussed below, in January 1982.
LaSalle 1:
Primary source was a discussion held with the LaSalle NRC Resident Inspector.
This date was the most optimistic date that the Resident Inspector estimated.
. Grand Gulf 1:
Based on input from and discussions with the NRC Resident Inspector,. Region II Personnel, and the applicant's letter of December
,s 1981, indicating the plant was 93% complete.
Caseload Forecast Panel estimated a July 1982 completion date following the site visit in 1980.
~
San Onofre 2:
Based on almost daily contact with Regional personnel,
{
and the NRC Resident Inspector.
l Summer 1:
Primary source was a memorandum dated January 6, 1982, from
^-
R. Lewis, Dfrector, Division of Resident and Reactor Project Inspection.
Regio.n II to D. Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, Office of Huclear Reactor Regulation.
This memorandum was submitted in response to Inspection Procedure 94300 B and subsequent memoranda will be issued monthly.
The latest estimate from Region II is for completion of the facility by mid-April 1982.
e-Diablo Canyon 1 and 2:
Primarily based on discussions with Region V.
,.('hif' Region V indicated a construction completion date for Diablo Canyon, Unit 2 4.l was December 1982. However, preoperational testing is not expected to be
..Iy;.
completed at that time.
Susquehanna 1:
Primarily based on discussions held with the NRC Resident 7 f,-y Inspector.
The estimate was essentially based on the applicant's completion s
of the preoperational testing.
LaSalle 2:
Primarily based on a letter dated January 7,1982, in which the N
applicant specified the date of January 31, 1983, as the LaSalle Unit 2 new target fuel load date.
Because the major portion of the NRC review effort was completed during the review of Unit 1, a more detailed estimat.e of construction completion is not warranted.
Watts Bar 1:
Based primarily upon the historical construction rates of other utilities.
As of December 1981, Unit I was estimated to be approximately 80% complete.
Discussions with the Resident Inspector supported this estimate.
A utility /NRC senior management meeting is being scheduled to resolve the difference between the NRC and utility estimates.
WNP-2:
The applicant. held meetings with the representatives of NRC's Caseload Forecast Panel (CFP) at the site of the WNP-2 plant on October 19, 20 and 21,1981.
The applicant described the progress of engineering and construction at the WNP-2 site.
Based on the work completed and work remaining, the CFP projected a February 1984 fuel load date.. A utility /
NRC senior management meeting'is being scheduled to resolve the difference between the NRC and utility estimates.
I
_ g Zirrer 1:
In February 1981 the Caseload Fo ? cast Panel estimated that Zir=er could be completed by August 1982. Gwever, it was indicated that this forecast was based on the assumption that the utility could perform preoperational testing at the rate it said it could.
If the utility could perform only as well as utilities have historically, then the estimate would be January 1983.
The utility has done neither. Therefore, althdugh the current NRC estimate is January 1983, this estimate might be opt'imistic.
i
~
l
~~San Onofre 3:~~
Based primarily upon the utility contention that construction of Unit 3 lags construction of Unit 2 by approximately one year.
Because the major portion of the NRC review effort was completed durir,c the review
.of Unit 2, a more detailed estimate of construction completion is not i
warranted.
i Fermi 2:
Primary source was Caseload Forecast Panel visit of September 1981.
l A utility /NRC senior management meeting will be scheduled to resolve the l
difference between the NRC and utility estimate.
Shoreham 1:
Date derived based on consensus of the combined judgments of the Project Manager, the NRC Resident Inspector, and the Region I Principal Inspector.
This consensus was based on the applicant's progress on the critical path construction items which involved turnovers to startup and preoperational testing.
Comanche Peak 1:
Primarily based on discussions with the Resident Construction Inspector (NRC).
St. Lucie 2:
Region II and the Resident Inspector provided input to the NRC i
estimates.
When asked to identify any known delays, they indicated that' i
there was no reason to believe that St. Lucie 2 would not meet the utility schedule.
In addition, the applicant updates a Project Master Schedule that shows critical path progress.
An 11 week delay because of some welding l
problems on large bore piping was being made up demonstrating the applicant's determination to maintain schedule. A recent monthly status report published by the applicant shows that the 11 week delay has been reduced to 4 weeks.
Callaway 1:
Primar.ily based on discussions with the Resident Inspector at the twin plant (Wolf Creek). The NRR Project Manager and Resicent Inspector 4
both agree that December 1983 for Callaway is'more likely than applicant's estimate of June 1983 for fuel load based on current status of construction.
A Caseload Forecast Panel site visit is scheduled for July 1982.
Palo Verde 1:
Primarily based upon the results of the October 1980 Caseload Forecast Panel site visit as modified by the applicant's aggressive pursuit of its own construction schedule.
l Waterford 3:
Primarily based upon discussions between the Project Manager-and various levels of utility management as supported by the results of the last Caseload Forecast Panel site visit in January 1981.
t 6
e
_._y,
.---v
M Clinton 1:
Primarily based upon the results of the last Caseload Forecast Panel site visit in November 1980.
However, because of quality assurance problems, electrical cable work has been stopped sir.ce January 19, 1982.
As of February 10, 1982, the work had not started.
Therefore, the NRC estimate is expected to be optimistic.
McGuire 2:
Primarily based on the utility contention that construction of Unit 2 lags construction of Unit 1 by approximately two years. Because the major portion of the NRC review effort was completed during the review of Unit 1, a more detailed esticate of construction completion is not warranted.
Watts Bar 2:
Based primarily upon the historica.1 ccastruction rates of other utilities.
As of December 1981, Unit 1 was estimated to be approximately 80% complete.
Discussions with the Residsnt Inspector supported this estimate.
Byron 1:
Based on discussions with the Byron Se'nior Resident Inspector (SRI) as well as a consideration of the most recent Caseload Forecast Panel visit in January 1981.
The Byron SRI indicated that some recent management changes had caused the actual construction completion curves to more closely parallel the applicant's estimated construction schedule for Unit 1, however, construction still lagged the applicant's projected schedule. Therefore, an October 1983 date was estimated for Unit 1 (as opposed to a Caseload Forecast Panel estimate of December 1983 and applicant projection of April 1983).
Wolf Creek 1:
Based primarily on the Caseload Forecast Panel site visit of November 1981.
A utility /NRC senior management meeting is being scheduled to resolve the difference between the NRC and utility estimates.
Susquehanna 2: Based on the utility's revised estimate of January 1982.
Because the major portion of the NRC review effort was completed during the review of Unit 1, a more detailed estimate of construction completion is not warranted.
Perry 1:
Based primarily on the Caseload Forecast Panel site visit of October.1981, which conciuded a February 1984 completion date. A utility /
NRC senior management meeting is being scheduled to resolve the difference between the NRC and utility estimates.
Midland 2:
The NRC estimate of July 1983 for Uni
~~2 (the lead unit) is in agreement with the applicant's estimate and is based primarily upon a Caseload Forecast Panel site visit in August 1981.~~
During that visit, the utility demonstrated that they had accomplished what they stated they would a ' year earlier (in the 1980 forecast panel meeting).
At the present time the NRC and the utility consider installation of bulk commodities to be the governing factor in completing construction of the plant.
9 4
b e
b
3-1
~4~
_ Catawba 1:
of. August 1981. Based primarily upon the Caselt-d Forecast Panel site visit schedule for support / restraint design, fabrication and insta overly optimistic to support Unit I hot functional testing scheduled for Apr.il 1983 and the associated fuel load date of August 1983.
dl50 Concluded that a more realistic fuel load date Would be th quarter of 1984, nominally February.
l Bellefonte 1:
visit in S eptember 1981. Based primarily upon Caseload Forecast Panel (CFP) site that the utility has consistently, for the past 3 years, failed to me their target bulk installation rates the quanti. ties of bulk comodities
' required have not been firmed up, unc,ertainties in the labor supply (with current shortages in engineers and QC inspectors scheduled for its pre-operational test program. ) and not enough time
_ River Bend 1:
Based primarily on a construction' completion rate of 1.25 percent per month, whii:h has been the historical construction rate of the plant to date.
involves little in the way of safety-related systems and com e.g., the reactor vessel is in place but none of the piping systems have been hooked up.
Seabrook 1:
Based primarily upon a Caseload Forecast Panel site visit in.
September 1981.
A utility /NRC senior management meeting has been scheduled to resolve the difference between the.NRC and utility estimates.
Palo Verde 2:
Based primarily upon the utility estimate that of Unit 2 lags Unit 1 construction by approximately one year. construction was. modified by the conclusion on the status of Unit 1 construction This estimate completion.
Comanche Peak 2:
(See narrative. for Comanche Peak 1.)
_ Midland 1:
(See narrative for Midland 2.)
South Texas 1:
and various levels of utility management. Based primarily upon discussion schedule during the Summer of 1982, upon co.The utility expects to revise its mpletion of the Bechtel reassessment of construction at the si,te.
Limerick:
Based pr'imarily upon discussions with various levels of utility-managenent.
A Caseload Forecast Panel site visit is scheduled for Jun in order to ensure proper allocation of resources to this projact-Harris 1:
Based primarily upon discus ~sions with various levels of util-ity management.
A Caseload Forecast Panel site visit is scheduled fcr December 1982 in order to ensure proper allocation of resources.to this project.
Braidwood 1:
January 1981. Based primarily upon Caseload Forecast Panel visit of
.

ML20042C547

Text

Dear Mr. Chairman:

Enclosure:

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

==

==

=

=

=

=

=

==

=

=

=

=

=

=

==

=

=

==

=

=

==

=

=

=

= = = =. =

=

=

w w w

=

=-

=

=t gg)

=

8=

2 5d d'5 2=

k O D E.J - O EZh=

=

=

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUBJECT:

Navigation menu

Search