ML20042B713
| ML20042B713 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 02/04/1982 |
| From: | Cantrell F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20042B702 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-327-81-42, 50-328-81-52, NUDOCS 8203250566 | |
| Download: ML20042B713 (2) | |
Text
.
O e
APPENDIX A f!0TICE OF VIOLATION Tennessee Valley Authority Docket Nos. 50-327 & 50-328 Sequoyah 1 and 2 License Nos. DPR-77 & DPR-79 As a result of the inspection conducted on December 6,1981 - January 5,1982, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violations were identified.
A.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II requires in part that the licensee..."
shall provice for indoctrination and training of personnel performing activities affecting quality as necessary to assure that suitable pro-ficiency is achieved and maintained..." The Operational QA Manual, part III, section 6., paragraph 1.5.1 also addresses the general aspects of training.
Administrative Instruction, AI-14, " Plant Training Program" implements these requirements, AI-14, paragraph II.A.3 states in part...
" Employees shall be evaluated for comprehension of the material presented by the completion of a written examination..."
Contrary to the above, a significant number of employees in the observed classes were not evaluated for comprehension or suitable proficiency in that casual proctoring invalidated, the examinations.
This is a Severity Level VI Violation (Supplement I.F.).
B.
Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering activities including safety-related annunciator response.
Contrary to the above, System Operating Instruction, S0I 55-0-M-12, (XA-55-120), " Annunciator. Response", was not implemented in that on December 15, 1981 the sample pump for monitor 2-RM-90-112 tripped pro-ducing an instrument malfunction annunciator. When questioned by the inspector, the Unit 2 operators were not aware of the annunciator and no action was taken to correct the problem.
Immediate action required by S0I 55-0-M-12 for the 2-RM-90-112 instrument malfunction annunciator included checking the instrument on the ' panel and dispatching an operator to the monitor to evaluate the problem.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) admission or denial of the alleged viola-tions; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps 8203250566 820317 DR ADOCK 05000
Tennessee Valley Authority 2
Docket Nos. 50-327 & 50-328 j
Notice of Violation License Nos. DPR-77 & DPR-79 i
which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
l i
FEB 0 41981 Date:
l i
1 t
a v
l s
%2 f
)
g
=
g o.
+
b
- wN l
l~
4
.3
'y y
.[-
i g
s x
g n
s 4
(
=$'
(
g t
b i
e g'_.
qj<
8,.
t
\\
g g
s
'A v
... -.