ML20041E857
| ML20041E857 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 03/09/1982 |
| From: | Miraglia F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Tallman W PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8203150178 | |
| Download: ML20041E857 (20) | |
Text
DISTRIBUTION:
Document Control:
Docket File NRC PDR LB#3 File Local PDR MAR 9 Igg DEisenhut NSIC RTedesco TERA Docket Nos: 50-843 FMiraglia ACRS (16) and 50-444 JLee to DWheeler e
/N IE 6
IE Region I A
Mr. W. C. Tallman ncCerfg Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 2
3 Public Service Company of New Hampshire C;
R101962s @
n, 7jf; g y8 Post Office Box 330 tr, Manchester, New Hampshire 03105 rce O
g
Dear Mr. Tallman:
/,
s
~
Subject:
Request for Additional Information Enclosed are requests for additional information from the Energency Prepared-ness Licensing Branch (EPLB, 810.1 thru 101).
1 On April 6, 1982 there will be a meeting at the site to develop a schedule for the safety review of the emergency plans. One of the items to be included in that schedule is a plan for providing the information identified in the enclosed requests. A meeting notice will be issued infonning you of the details of the meeting.
The Seabrook Project Manager, Mr. Louis L. Wheeler,(301/492-7792), is available to provide any additional information you may require.
Sincerely, Original signed by Frank J. Miraglia l
Frank J. Miraglia, Chief l
Licensing Branch No. 3 l
Division of Licensing l
l
Enclosure:
l Request for Additional l
Information l
cc w/ enclosure:
See next page A
omce >.Q.k.;.. f.........
.D
.......... ~ ~ - -
~ ~ ~.. - - -
~ ~ - -
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
~ ~ ~ * - - - - ~ ~ ~
DWh r:ph F
ia surume >
31 E. 82..
.3L
. 1R2..
-. ~. - ~ ~ ~ - -
-. - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
~ ~ ~ ~ - -
8203150178 820309 m
PDR ADOCK 05000443 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam mi-. mom e
rare j
SEABROOK
~~
1 William C. Tallman Chairman'and Chief Executive Officer.
- Public Service Company of New Hampshire P. O. Box 330 Manchester.. New Hampsnire 03105 John A. P.itscher. Esq.
'E. Tupper Kinder. Esa.
Ropes and Gray
. Assistant Attorney General 225 Franklin Street
' Office of Attorney General i
Boston, Massachusetts 02110 208 State House Annex
+
Concord. New Hampshire 03301 i:ir. Bruce B. Beckley. Project Manager j
Public Service Company of New Hampshire Tne_ Honorable Arnold Wight P. O. Box 330 New Hampshire House of Representatives-l Manchester New Hampshire 03105 Science. Technology ana Energy Committee 5 tate House G. Sanborn' Concord. New Hampshire 03301 U. S. NRC - Region 1 631 Park Avenue Resident Inspector King of Prussia. Pennsylvania 19406 Seabrook Nuclear Power Station 4
c/o V. S; Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
Ms. Elizabeth H. Weinhold,
P.-0. Box 700 3 Godfrey Avenue Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874 i
Hampton, New Hampshire 03842 fir. ' John LJYincentis. Project Manager i
Robert A. Backus. Esq.
Yankee Atomic-Electric Company O'Neill Backus and Spielman 1671 Worcester Road 116 Lowell Street Farmingham.,Massarhusetts.01701 i
i Manchester. New Hampshire 03105 Mr. A. M. Ebner. Project Manager Norman Ross. Esq.
United Engineers anc Constructors 39 Francis Street
- 30. South 17th Street Brookline, Massachusetts 02146 Post Office Box 8223 l
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Karin P. Sheldon, Esq.
Snelccr.. Harmon & Weiss-Mr. W. Wrignt. Project Manager i
1725 : Street. !..
K.
'nestinghouse Electric Corporation i
Washington. D. C.
20006 rvst Office Box 355 l
Pittsburg, Pennsylvania -15230 I
Laurie Burt. Esq.
. ~
Office of ' the Assistant Attorney General Thomas Dignan. Esq.
Environmental Protection Division.
Ropes and Gray One Ashburton Place 225 Franklin' Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Boston Massachusetts 02110 i
1 l
D. Pierre G. Cameron, Jr.. Esq.
General Counsel i
Public Serv. ice Company of New Hampshire
-l l
P. O. Box 330 l
Manchester-New ' Hampshire 03105
~
. ~ - ~
c
, ENCLOSURE '
A.
ASSIGNMENT 0F RESPONSIBILITY (ORGANIZATION CONTROL) 810.1 1.
Provide agreements with any agencies or support organizations which have a response role within the-EPZ.
Describe the concept of operations of each of the offsite response agencies involved in protective action decision-making and implementation, offsite monitoring, data collection and analysis, site access control, and plant evacuee processing to demonstrate that these efforts have been coordinated with the onsite response.
In addition, each step in the protective action decision-making and implementation chain (down to' the local level) must be specified to demonstrate that -protective s
i action decision for the total range of protective actions (shelter and evacuation) can be made and implemented promptly (15 minutes) on a 24-hour-a-day basis.
810.2 2.
Provide a block diagram that shows the interrelationships of the site response centers and duty stations of personnel, t
810.3 3.
Submit the approved State and local response plans for those governmental
~
entities wholly or partially within the plume exposure EPZ and the portions of'the Maine State Plan that address their ingestion pathway response in accordance with 10 CFR 50.33.
810.4 4
Adju'st the plume EPZ boundary to account for' local response needs and i
capabilities in accordance with 10 CFR 50.33.
In addition, discuss how-demography, topography, land characteristics, access roads, 'and jurisdic-tional boundiries were considered.
69 e*".p-eas v-e
--w,---
-,y--
y-ergTy.
+ - -~
y i
my4-r-
e.
r-y,---t-
-.v-e
=
+~-+rw1-r' Y
810.5 5.
Provide letters of agreement for the Federal,' local, and private support agencies that provide the information set forth in NUREG-0554 Criteria A.3 and B.9.
All agreements should be reviewed and certified current, and preferably dated within one year of anticipated license issuance.
810.6 6.
Clarify who i... responsibility for 24-hour manpower planning for the onsite emergency response staff.
B.
ONSITE EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION 810.7 1.
Upon arrival of the Recovery Manager, it is no't clear whether he or the Emergency Director has the overall responsibility for the direction and control of the integrated emergency response effort. The individual having this functional responsibility should be designated as the Emergency Director.
810.8 2.
Clearly state that the Emergency, Director or Shif t Supervisor acti.ng as the Emergency Director has the authority and responsibility to immediately and unilaterally provide protective action recommendation to authorities respon-sible for their implementation.
This should include recommendation for sheiter.and evacuation as warranted.
810.9 3.
Provide a backup to the Shif t Supervisor to make protective' action decisions in the event the Shift Supervisor cannot respond to the affected Control Room promptly.
810.10 4
Proyide a STA and a communicator on the backshift in accordance with Table B-1, NUREG-0654.
t
_:;. c.
. m
.... _ n _.. _... _.__.._. _. _ _ _ n.. _...
.n z,,
810.11 5.
Spec'ify the response' times and expertise of the augmentation, personnel to demonstrate the 30 and 60 minute capabi,lities set forth in NUREG-0654, Table B-1.
This should be specified down to the working level and should show the relationship between the normal job assignment titles and emer-gency functions, such as radiological monitoring.
Ir addition, describe
^
how this capability will be demonstrated (e.g., drills), maintained and implemented (e.g., beepers and duty rosters).
810.12 6.
For each' transfer of the Emergency Director's functions, specify the criteria for allowing assumption of these functions (e.g., briefing of
~
~
replacement) and describe how the transfer of 'these responsibilities will be noticed to all appropriate parties (onsite and offsite).
8i0.13 7.
Specify the functional responsibilities assigned to'the Emergency Director that may not be delegated. Among these responsibilities, include the i
decision to notify and recommend protective action to offsite officials.
810.14 8.
Show the duty stations (e.g.. TSC) of the emergency organization members-on the organization figures.
810.15 9.
Specify who will provide corporate level interface with governmental authorities.
810.16 10.
Provide letters of agreement for the NSSS, AE, and other utility support that contain the information set forth in NUREG-0654, Criterion B-9.
F
'1 i$
% n
'-J*
4
-y+,--
,,t-w,,
,n
-~u e.
f
_..a.
.. _ _ ~
-.2.
1 11.
Prov'ide for transfer of the responsibility for total emergency response 810.17 direction from the Control Room to the TSC and finally to the EOF in accordance with the scheme in NUREG-0696.
C.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT AND RESOURCES 810.18' l.
Expand the discussion of emergency response support and resources to in-clude the information required in Criteria C.1 a, b, and c of NUREG-0654 and to request assistance directly through the Federal Radilogical Moni-toring and Assistance Plan.
Support these arrangements by a letter of agreement attached to the plan.
810.19 2.
Prepare a procedure for the dispatch of a representative to the principal offsite governmental emergency operations center, if requested, in accor-dance with NUREG-0654, Criterion C.2.b.
D.
EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM S10.20 1.
Establish Emergency Action Levels (EALs) for each initiating condition specified in Appendix 1 to NUREG-0554 The EALs should be observables (e.g., instrumen't readings, equipment status indications, alarm annun-ciators) which are both necessary and sufficient to explicit'yly and uniquely characterize each emergency level.
- 810.21 2.
The initiating conditions should include the postulated accidents in the Fina.1 Safety Analysis Report in addition to those referenced in Item 1 above.
7 z.---.
-. J L l
810.22 3.
Provide a discussion'of how the EALs will be integrated to Control Room
~
(
]
operator response to demonstrate that a system Fas heen established that will provide for rapid and accurate classification of events. This should include a description of the job aids used and a description of how this
~
~
. system wi ll be tested by the ' Control Room staff.
E.
NOTIFICATIION METHODS AND PROCEDURES 810.23
1.
Describe the provisions for prompt (15 minutes) notification of the offsite authorities responsible.for protection action decision-making and imple-mentation as required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix E', II".D.3.
l 810.24 2.
Describe the methods for alerting, notifying and mobilizing off-duty personnel to meet the response time requirements of NUREG-0554, Table B-1.
3 1
6.10.25 3.
Identify the potentially affected population in the initial offsite notification message and provide for protective action reccmmendations i
based on plant conditions.
II 2f 4.
Describe the provisions for followup emergency messages to oMsite author-ities, and provide formats of the initial and followup messages which in-j clude the information specified in Criteria E.3 and 4 of NUREG-0654, i
{
810.27 5.
Provide a complete description of the administrative and physical means for prompt alerting and notification of the public within the plume exposure 1
6 7
i t*
+=5+..-
s.y
- e.,m a,
v.,,_.,.-4.,,.,--
n,
. ~. -,
~
_..m____c.__._____..
~
pathway EPZ.
Sufficient detail should be provided for evaluation against the criteria set forth in Appendix 3 to NUREG-0654 Include a schedule through operational readiness for the overall system. This should include the system used to promptly provide public information messages and how these will be coordinated among the States.
The system described which involves callbacks by Public Health Officials followed by contacting of j
State Civil Defense before local officials are contacted (those who will-take protective actions) does not demonstrate prompt protective action -
decis, ion-making as required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. II.D.3.
1 810.28 6.
Provide copies of'the written messages (discussed in Section 11.3) intended i
for public release that address a range of protective measures as set forth in NUREG-0654, Criterion E.7.
i F.
EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS 810.29
- 1. ' Provide primary and backup means of communications to all the offsite
. authorities responsible for protective action decision-making and imple-mentation on a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> basis.
l l
810.30 2.
Provide for communications with the local governments' in the plume EPZ.
f I
810.31 3.
Provide a communications link for fixed and' mobile suppor't facilities.in accordance with NUREG-0554, Criterion F.2.
810.32 4
Provide for a quarterly communications test with the Federal emergency response organizations and States within the ingestion pathway in
-e s-s t+ 9 p. ow 9 e e me'va ce e
-4h-er' e~-w,-r, t
+
____c,.
,.u
--~~ ~ ~ -.-....
-~
~
accordance with NUREG-0554, Criterion N.2.a.
In addition, provide for-monthly communications tests in accordance with 10, FR 50, Appendix E, C
IV.E(9)(d).
5.
Identify the provisions for communications 'with DOE and the U.S. Coast Guard B10 33 as set forth in Criteria F.1.c of NUREG-0554.
G.
PUBLIC EDUCATION AND INFORMATION 810.34 1.
Providb additional description of the emergency inforamtion hrochures to-demonstrate that the information set forth in NUREG-0654, Criterion Gsl
~
will be supplied.
In addition, provide a sample copy of the emergency preparedness information which will be provided for both the resident and transient population around the site, along with a schedule for Its dissemination.
810.35 2.
Describe the means to be used to disseminate the information such that the written material will likely be available in a residen:e during an emergency (e.g., phone book).
In addition, describe the provisions for posting information for transient populations and for providing informa-tion to special populations and facilities.
810.36 3.
Further describe.the provisions for timely. exchange of information between the licensee and the State spokesperson.
81'0.37 4.
Describe the provisions for dealing with rumors and public inquiries.
'*wt~'
e_*
N e,*-c_-o
.-.oe
=,. -
n
. ~... _. _.. _..,, _.... _ _ _
4 h
810.38 5.
Pr' ovide the media hith information on protective actions and their relation to possible plant conditions during the per'iodical, m,edia programs. ~ Commit -
I to conduct the media programs at least annually.
t 810~39 6.
Commit to provide and post updated information for' permanent and transient I
population at least annually.
H.
EMERGENCY FACILITIES AND EOUIPMENT
]
810.40 1.
Provide a' commitment for the permanent Emergency Response Facilities in accordance with NUREG-0696 and provide sttffic'ient information to 3
demonstrate the facilities meet the guidance of NUREG-0696.
In addition,
?
the transfer of. emergency response function as the Facilities are manned should be in accordance with NUREG-0696.
j.
810.41 2.
Clearly specify the times by which the TSC and EOF will be activated-and manned to demonstrate that the TSC will be activated within 30 minutes and the EOF within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. This should be coordinated with man-power augmentation response times.
o i
810.42 3.
Provide a list of the process, radiation, geophysical, and fire assess-ment monitoring systems that will be used to initiate emergency measures 4
in accordance with' the EALs when established. -For each instrument used in an EAL, provide its range, location, and type.
i
)
e
+
,e w e-r+ws wwww -wr-e-e e tv se w s eeww e 2-ms- * - -, <
e-w+
twt-we w-
--r-y n
- -- -+ - - ~+, - Tr'^
D vr-
+
f'-r--
~ ~
~ ',_:' '
. ~-...,... _._.
' =:
810.43 4.
Provide a description of the radiol.ogical monfters and onsite laboratory ficilities as discussed in NUREG-0654, Criterion H.6.b.c.
In addition, discuss how these facilities will be incorporated into the emergency re-sponse assessment.
810.44 5.
Provide a description of the offsite monitoring equipment in~accordance with NUREG-0654, Criterion H.7.
~
6.
Describe the equipment and supplies available at the OSC in accordance 810.45 with NUREG-0654, Criterion H.9.
810.46 7.
Discuss the habitability of and access to the OSC during postulated accident conditions.
In addition, provide a plant drawing showing the location of the OSC and its size.
8,10.27 8.
Provide a description of the emergency kits in accordance with the guidance of Criterion H.ll of NUREG-0654 to demonstrate that sufficient
~
supplies and equipment have been provided to support the emergency. support functions preformed.from various locations.
9.
Provide sufficient detail to demonstrate compliance with the guidance of 810.48 NUREG-0654, Appendix 2.
S10.49 10.
Describe the provisions for coordination of field monitoring da'ta with offsite agencies to-include the location at which this will be performed.
I i,
.-n
<~.re<-e-,-e,-,.~.,-,-v,,-rar,-
- x. v -,. -
.y..
,,s,
_.-._w a
_.a c ;
m<
I.' ACCI' DENT ASSESSMENT 1
810.50 4.
Provide the plant system and effluent parameter values that address i
NUREG-0654, Criterion I.l.
7 j
810.51 2.
As part of the description of onsite capability and resources to provide
~
initial and continuing assessment throughout the course of an accident, i
include postaccident sampling capability, radiation and effluent monitors, in-plant iodine instrumentation, and a containment monitoring. Provide sufficient ' detail to enable evaluation against clarification Items II.
B.3, II.F.1, and III.D.3.3 in NUREG-0737. This should include a descrip-tion of how these capabilities will be integrated into dose assessment, plant protective action descision-making, accident assessment, and offsite protective action recommendation processes.
Include a discussion of when.
these various assessmentiactions will be preformed.
3.
Provide detailed information on the methods and techniques used for 810.52 determining the source term. This should include the relationship be-i tweeg containment monitor readings and core conditions.
(This should l
'be included in the EAls).
l 810.53 4.
Provide a further description of the dose ~ projection methodology to allow evaluation against the criteria in NUREG-0654, Appendix 2, and Criterion I.5.
This should include a description of the assumptions, I
conversion factors and their bases, copies of job aids (nomograms) etc. for projection doses based on, containment leakage, effluent monitor readings, and field monitor results, both onsite and offsite.
4 7""' ; *
'liJ
~
g 3 iq v.
0%
y
- 7. m gg
m 2
.. ~,
.,. =
=..:.... - -. -.-.....,._:-.
- ,;x...,_ _ ~,.a, a 810.54 5.
Describe the methodology for determining the release rate / projected doses
~
if any of the following are offscale-or-inopdrable:
a.
containment monitor, b.
stack monitor, or
~
meteorolog'ical instruments, c.
t b
' 810.55' 6.
Provide a description of the filcd monitoring capabilities that address-the items set forth in NUREG-0654, Criterion I.8.
1 81,0.'56 T.
Describe the provisions to meet NUREG-0654, Crit'dr' ion I.9 and provide the
~ basis for'the conclusion that the system can-detect radiciodine concentra-tions' in air as low as 10-7p ci/cc under field conditions.
l a
810.57 8.
Describe'the method to be used to meet Criterion I:10.
I J.
'ROTECTIVE RESPONSE 810.58 1.
Specify the means and time required to warn and advise persons..in the owner-controlled area.
4 8I0.59 2.
Describe the provisions for reassembly areas beyond the immediate area of I
the plant (5 miles) fcr use for plant evacuess if immediate evacuation of the site is required. This should include a map showing location and evacuation routes.
In addition, provide for marking of in-plant evac-uation routes.
i
-r-
,. w
--,s e -., 7 y--
~c-
... ~ -
w,.c..
. ~.
~
a.
...z.=.=..-.
3.
Specify the criteria used to determine when plant evacuee monitoring is
~
810.60 required and the criteria for allowing immed'iate eva.cuation and further
~
Provide for conitoring at the monitoring and decontamination offsite.
I This should off' site assembly' areas if onsite monitoring is not possible.
include how evacuees will be notified to go' to a reassembly area for monitoring.
Specify the location of the monitoring points.
Provide a description of the decontamination provisions and their rela-810.61 4.
tion. ship to evacuee monitoring points in accordance with NUREG-0654, Criterion J.4.
Specify that accountability within 30 minutes is the goal of the program.
810.62 5
Provide for reccmmending both shelter and evacuation of offsite officials 810.63 6.
as soon as conditions that warrant such measures are identified.
Provide criteria for recommending protective action that take the following into consideration:
indications of potential or actual core / containment conditions s,
(Site Area / General Emergency EALs) that warrant taking offsite protective actions and their timing in relation to the time required to take protective actions, (In addition to recommending protective actions based on projected doses) and offsite factors (evacuation times /special facilities / shelter /
b.
meteorology) that will influence the effectiveness of the pro-tective actions and using key-hole approach (don't jdst recommend protective actio c.
downwind).
~
]
m
~...
..x
.u.. :-
.a..
. a.-.
~,;., w w a
~
]
Prov'ide for annual r'eview by offsite protective action decision-makers' of the protective action decision making crit'eria.
~
810.64 7.
Provide updated evacuation time estimates that addresse; the criteria in
~
NUREG-0654, Appendix 4 and integrate them i'nto the protective action desicion-making methods.
810.65 8.
Provide a map that shows the information set forth in NUREG-0654, Criterion
~
J.10. a.
~
81.0.66 9',
Provi.de the information specified in NUREG-06S4, Criterion J.10.m.
K.
RADIOLOGICAL EXPOSURE CONTROL i
810.67 1.
Include the emergency exposure guidelines for individuals involved in assessment actions, first aid, personnel decontamination, ambulance service, I
and medical treatment.
210.68 2.
Describe the onsite decontamination control teasures.fo.r limiting area access, drinking water and food supplies, and the quantitative criteria for permitting return to arets and items to normal use.
t 8
~ S10 ~. 69 3.
Describe the capability for decontaminating, personnel evacuated to offsite locations ' including provisions for extra protective clothing ahd decon-taminants suitable for the contamination expected with particular attention to radiciodine contamination of the skin.
4 y
e-r, w---,-
---an
,1, g
y
+-3,J 7
y
,y.
-r,.-
~.
- l..--_
- s...
?.-.:=
..~...-. -_
Specify action le'vels for emergency decontamination, and means of decontami 810.70 4
nation of personnel wounds, supplies, instruments, and equipe.ent.
Describe how the radiation protection program implemented during emergencies L
810.71 5.
will differ from the normal program and how these measures will be announced
~
to onsite personnel.
L.
MEDICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH SUPPORT _
4 Provide letters of agreement for the medical and ambulance support that 810.'/2 1.
delineate the items specified in NUREG-0654,. Criterion B.9.
Provide a further description of the first aid facilities to include the 2.
810.73 supplies, layout, capacity, and access to decontamination capabilities.
RECOVERY AND REENTRY PLANNING AND POSTACCIDENT OPERAT M.
810.74 1.
Describe the general plans for reentry and recovery.
Describe the authority and responsibility of the key members of the 810.75 2.
This should recovery organization (in addition to Recovery Manager).
include technical personnel with responsibilities to develop, evaluate, In addition, specify the and direct recovery and reentry operations.
j specific criteria by which emergency classification will be downgraded.
y l
-gp-p,4-,..
-r-w-,
.w>
--4
~
,--%--7
--r--
e,,,
d' 830.76 3.
Specify the means for informing members of the response organization th'at the emergency class has been downgraded or that the, recovery organization is in effect. Also discuss.how members of the emergency resporse organization will be informed of changes in the emergency. organization chain of command.
N.
EXERCISES AND DRILLS 810.77' l.
Communications with the NRC she'uld be tested monthly in accordance with 4-
~
paragraph E.9.d of Ap.pendix E to 10 CFR Part 50.
810.78 2: Communications with the States within the ingestion pathway should be tested quarterly.
810.79 3.
Include the U.S. Coast Guard in the communications drill with the Federal response organizations.
l 810.50 4.
Communication with local response organizations should be tested annually.
The communication drills should test ' he aspect of understanding of message 810.81 5.
t content.
810.82 6.
The radiological moni'toring drill should include communication, record-keeping, and interface with offsite monitoring efforts.
810.83 7.
The annual health physics drill should include simulated post accident sam-pling (simulated elevated samples) and the use of these results in dose projections.
i l
8 i
L.a,_. _... _..
~
m _ u
..m.
F 810.84 8.
The ' annual exercise 1hould simulate radiological releases which would re-The annul exercise scenario should quire offsite protective measures.
a be varied to. test all the major elemenrs of plans and preparedness every
'5 years.
In addition, the provisions should be made to start an exercise between 6:00 p.m. and midnight and another between midnight and 6:00 a.m.
once every six years. Some exercises should be unannounced.
810.85 9.
Discuss the mix of structured and less-structured aspects of the exercise
~ '
-program which will allow free play for decisionmaking during drills and i
I exercises.
O.
RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAI'NING 810.86 1.
Indicate that the training for medical support organizations who may enter the site will include site acc'ess procedures and the identity,of the onsite individual who will control their activities.
810.87
. 2.
Describe the provisions in the training program for offsite police and the onsite security force.
610.88 3.
Indicate that the training for local fire department support will include who will control, fire fighting efforts following arrival of offsite assistance.
In addition, if there is a mutual aid agreement for fire support, the officers of these departments should also be trained.
810.89 4.
Commit tha.t each member of the plant staff who may be assigned an emer-gency function will annually demonstrate their' ability to perform those emergency tasks that are not part of their normal plant functions.
h
3
... :x.... ~.- :.,...,
..-a---
- f...
810.90 5.
Prov'ide training to 'the offsite officials responsible for protective action desicionmaking on protective actions t'o be recommended and their relationship to plant conditions.
810791 6.
. Provide training to the following:
~
corporate emergency support, rescue personnel, personnel responsible for 24-hour manpower planning, t
I
control-room communicator, personnel responsible fo'r transfer to alter'nate' EOF, technical support personnel in,
- accident conditions
- corrective response, and
- offsite impact of correcrive actions.
810.92 7.
All members of the recovery organization with key functions should be trained, t
810.93 8.
Training of rescue / corrective teams, should include training on how to perform und'er accident conditions.
81'0.94 9.
Provide annual training to all plant personnel on their expected response during emergencies.
810.95 10.
Describe the pr6 visions for documenting the training program.
A
. T. a.
,,.... -. _. ~.. - :...
.-. = :.:..u ~ :z w
~.. a u.iLa
- w., -
!.;L;
~
~
P..
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PLANNING EFFORT:
DEVELOPMENT,PERIODICREVIEWANDDISTRIBUTIOh0FEMERGENCYPLANS 810.96 1.
Provide training for the individual's. responsible for the planning effort.
7
~
810_.97
-2.
Identify, by title, the individual with overall authority _ and responsibility for radiological emergency planning (Emergen'cy Planning Coordinator) and identify the individual responsible for updating and coordinating th'e plan with other response organizations. This should include identification of an onsile individual with responsibility for emergency planning.
810.98 3.
Provide a detailed listing of support plans and procedures that will support or be used to implement the plan.
810.99 4
Provide a cross-reference to the criteria in NUREG-0654._
810.100 5.
Provide for an independent audit in accordance with NUREG-0554, Criterion P-9.
1 810.101
'6'.
Provide for quarterly updating of telephone numbers.
t D
9 h