ML20041E727
| ML20041E727 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 03/09/1982 |
| From: | EBASCO SERVICES, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041E709 | List: |
| References | |
| ETR-1001-R10A, NUDOCS 8203110286 | |
| Download: ML20041E727 (200) | |
Text
l l
l EBASCO NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL NO. f bb APPLICABLE TO South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Ouality Assurance During Construction gg CONSuzy4
%V 47
- 4 n n g , i =
'*teRs co st I
COPYRIGHT 1974 EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED TWO RECTOR STREET NEW YORK 8203110286 820309 PDR ADOCK 05000498 A PDR
- . ~ _ - . . - - . _ . - . _ - . - . . . . . - . - - _ _ _ . - . . . . . . _ . . - . _ _ - - _ __
l 4
I i
l I I O PART C
\
b i l l
1 t
EBASCO SERVICES, INCORPORATED
! QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION i
SOUTil TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION ;
QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 1
i O
4 j
l I
i l '
1 I
i t
O I
i 1
- ...-,-.-._m,-- - -- _.. -.. _ _ _ . .. _ ..._ -,._.. _
sios.sn.7s Pact I er 2 EBA5co SERvlCES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMMANUAL SECTioH INCORPOR ATED SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION
[nJ g Revis,ow Addendum 1
!< MIN M.. .m..;.
2..<,... .......... ....
INTRODUCTION & SCOPE OF SERVICES oAre 3/4/A2 Introduction The Ebasco Quality As.surance Program to be used on Soutit Texas Project is de-scribed in ETR-1001 Rev.10a, Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual.
ETR-1001 Rev. '10a was accepted by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 10, 1981. ETR-1001 Rev.10a represents Ebasco Quality Program policy and requirement for the design and construction of nuclear power stations under the jurisdiction of or in accordance with the requirements of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In this respect, it is the standard to be used by all Ebasco personnel. Ebasco's committrrent to Quality is confirmed in the " Statement of Au-thority" ' signed by the President of Ebasco Se'rvices, Incorporated.
Scope of Services ,
9
'Ebasco Services, Incorporated's scope of services for the South Texas Pro-ject includes construction services, and quality assurance and quality control ap-propriate to those services. The. design-sections of ETR-1001 Rev. 10a are not ap-plicable to Ebasco Services, Incorporated's scope of services. Those responsi-bilities are assigned to Bechtel Power Corporation. The remainder of ETR-1001 Rev.
10a has been rev'iewed. and modified as appropriate for the South Texas Project. Those ifications are described .in the addenda following each section of ETR-1001 Rev.
v These addenda identify those portions of ETR-1001 Rev.10a which have been deleted or modified for the South Texas Project. All paragraphs which were not
~
modified or deleted are applicable as written.
-Ebasco's scope of services for.the South Texas Project includes procurement and receiving inspection of non-pomanent plant material. To assure that control is exercised over any safety-related. aspects of such procurements (e.g. , chloride
! control of consumables) sections QA-I-5, III-3 ahd 4, and III-11 have remained in place with minor modifications.
. Ebasco's scope of services for. the South Texas Project includes responsiblity ,
for the calibration program. To' assure that control is, exercised over the pro-curement of selected calibration services ~(which are beyond the site calibration laboratory's capability) sections QA-I-5, QA-III-3, 4, 5, and 14, have remained in place with minor modifications.
Portions of Ebasco's scope of services for the South Texas Project may be l
subcontracted with Bechtel's approval. To assure control is exercised over the l subcontract process, sections QA-I-5, QA-III-3, 4, and 5 have remained in place l wi th minor modi fications.
m '
[
v)k\ .
\ ..,
I
6109 4/2 75 PAGE CF ESA5CO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION INCORPOR AT ED SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT O j ELECT,RIC GENERATING STATION newsieuAddendum 1 V ' "^re 3/4/82 L INTRODUCTION & SCOPE OF SERVICES Section QA-III-1 " Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings" contains certain requirements relating to control of drawings. BPC is the Architect. Engineer and will issue all. design ' drawings; Ebasco may, however, from time to time, initiate drawings which are not design disclosure documents, but which will be approved by Bechtel Power Corporation Construction Management and controlled by Ebasco (for example; rigging schemes).
U .
D 0 *O 9
4 1
4 D
S g-9 S
- +
-p., _ -. - .- _ _-._m._ . . - . . _ y_. .- , , ,, . , , . - . , . - , . - - ~ -
$ 3MC %
+ g UNITED STATES
[f g
E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20666 Q '+9 . . . . . JUN 101981 Mr. B. E. Tenzer Vice President Materials Engineering &
Quality Assurance Ebasco Services Incorporated Two World Trade Center New York, NY 10048
Dear Mr. Tenzer:
SUBJECT:
NRC ACCEPTANCE OF REVISIONS TO QA TOPICAL REPORT We have completed our review of proposed Revision 10 (dated April 30, 1981 and June 2,1981) to Ebasco Topical No. ETR-1001, "Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual." The revisions concern general organizational and progrannatic changes.
Based on our evaluation of the proposed changes described in Revision 10, we find that your revised topical report continues to meet the criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and is, therefore, acceptable. To use the topical report in future license applications, Ebasco need only reference this topical report in Section 17 of the Safety Analysis Report. We do not intend to repeat our review of this topi-O cal report when it is referenced in an application unless changes occur in our acceptance criteria.
()
Should regulatory criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions about this topical report are invalidated, we will notify you. You will be given the opportunity to revise and resubmit it should you so desire. As noted above, should you desire to reference this topical report in support of quality assurance programs for new nuclear power projects, the basis of our evaluation will be the acceptance criteria given in the revision to SRP Section 17.1 in use at that time.
Progranmatic changes by Ebasco to the quality assurance program described in this topical report are to be submitted to the NRC for review prior to implementation.
Organizational changes are to be submitted no later than 30 days after announcement.
l Please replace our letter of January 5,1981 with this letter, renumber the report as ETR-1001, Rev.10A, and submit 36 copies to the NRC. Your submittal should iden-tify the changes by use of a black bar in the margin, and the revision number should be shown adjacent to the bar. Your transmittal letter should also identify the nuclear units to which this revised topical report will apply.
Should you have any questions regarding our review or if we can provide assistance, please feel free to contact me or Mr. William Belke at (301) 492-7741.
Sincerely, (l' . n as -
~ Walter P. Haass, Chief Quality Assurance Branch l
Division of Engineering l
l
EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED EKO Two World Trade Center. New /ork. N Y 10048 v
STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY The management of Ebasco Services Incorporated recognizes the necessity for a comprehensive Quality Program for Nuclear Power Plants. Ebasco Company Procedure No. N-21 establishes the basic organization, assigns authorities and responsibility for implementing the Quality Program, '
and establishes the requirement for a corporate Quality Assurance Manual.
Accordingly, this Manual represents Ebasco Quality Program policy. In this respect, it is to be used as a standard by personnel in all Ebasco Organizational Units.
The primary responsibility for overall implementation and administration of the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program rests with the Vice President Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance as delegated to him by the Executive Vice President - Operations. The Quality Program Committee has been established under the auspices of the Exectuve Vice President -
Operations, consisting of representatives of designated Vice Presidents.
V The committee is permanent and its Chairman shall be the Vice President Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance.
/A m ~ u W Wallace III President April 24, 1981
\
EBTSCH SEntlCES thC0APOR4TED m
(J FOREWORD This manual represents Ebasco Quality Program policy and requirements for the design and construction of neulear power stations under the jurisdiction or in accordance with the requirements of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In this respect, it is to be used as a standard by all Ebasco personnel.
The manual has been prepared by the Quality Assurance Engineering Department and approved by the Ebasco Quality Program Committee. The manual reflects official Ebasco policy and has been designed to meet the requirements of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission document 10 CFR 50, Appendix B (18 Quality Assurance Criteria), and American National Standards Institute docment N45.2, entitled Quality Assuranca Program Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants.
The Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual has been designed to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.34(7) for a quality assurance program descrip-tion. It will be incorporated into applicable portions of safety analysis reports by reference as provided by 10 CFR 50.32.
The primary responsibility for overall implementation and administration of the Ebasco Quality Program rests with the Vice President Materials Engineering
(,-_ ) and Quality Assurance as delegated to him by the Executive Vice President -
\s_,/ Operations. The Chief Quality Assurance Engineer is assigned the responsibi-lity and authority to enforce Ebasco Quality Program requirements and has the unqualified support of Corporate Management. His decisions may not be over-ridden by personnel in any division or department, except with the written consent of the Vice President Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance or the Executive Vice President - Operations.
The Chief Quality Assurance Engineer shall staff each project to the extent necessary to perform Quality Assurance tasks directly and audit departments other than his own in their performance of tasks related to Quality Assurance.
The Chief Quality Assurance Engineer has the authority to require immediate correction of any non-conforming activity or condition to comply with Ebasco Quality Program requirements, or if necessary, to stop work until suitable corrective action has been taken or a satisfactory resolution reached.
Recommendations or questions regarding the Quality Program or the manual shall be referred to the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer, who shall be responsible for resolution. The Ebasco Quality Program Committee is res-ponsible for and has the authority to make and approve procedures for any changes to this manual.
t t )
v
Ell lS Cll SI:llVICES S ht St P DR 4i! D v The Quality Program Coordinator, designated by the Chairman of the Ebasco Quality Program Committee, functions as the Committee's secretary and poblishes to all manual holders an Updating Status Memorandum for the manual at least every six months. The Memorandum summarizes changes made to the manual during the preceding period. The Quality Program Coordinator also raintains a listing of individual pages in the manual which indicates the curcent issue or revision date of each page. Information from this list can be obtained by addressing inquiries to the Quality Program Coordi-nator at the Ebasco New York Office.
The manual is assigned by the Quality Program Coordinator to individuals as required for their exclusive use. However, it remains the property of Ebasco Services Incorporated and shall be returned upon request. It ,is loaned in confidence and upon the condition that neither it nor the infor-mation contained in it will be reproduced, copied or disclosed in whole or in part. The material herein is copyrighted and protected by the copyright laws.
Should any circumstance arise under which a holder no longer requires the manual for the specific purporse for which it was assigned,-it shall be returned promptly to the Quality Program Coordinator. Nuclear Quality Assurance manuals shall not be transferred or loaned to any other indivi-dual, position, firm or corporation without the written authorization of p)
L, V
the Chairman of the Ebasco Quality Program Committee. The Quality Program Coordinator shall be informed promptly of any change in the mailing address of a manual holder.
Manual holders are responsible to maintain their copies in updated condition, including the proper insertion of new or revised sections as furnished and the destruction of all cancelled or superseded sections. Sections shall not be removed from manuals except as directed for revision or cancellation.
b . [.
B E Tenzer Vice President Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance
( April 27, 1981 l
l o) i
esos /t n rate 1 cr 2 Y
EdASCO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioM INCORPORATED
/
(;/ g '
/ > .....- . 6. .. n .. .. . TABLE OF CONTENTS naviuon 10 A R10 DATc Julv 31. 19_8 LR10
..........,yp............
l Part I - Ceneral Section Title Rev. No. Date QA-I-1 Quality Assurance Program 5 2/29/80 QA-I-2 Organization and Responsibilities 5 , RIO QA-I-3 Personnel Indoctrination and Training 2 8/11/77 Program in Quality Assurance QA-I-4 Design Centrol 1 8/11/77 QA-I-5 Quality Assurance Evaluation of 2 R10 Suppliers / Contractors QA-I-6 Quality Assurance Records 0 3/14/75 Part II - Engineering Offices Section Title Rev. No. , Date QA-II-1 Instructions, Procedures & Drawings 2 3/4/81 QA-II-2 Document Control 2 3/4/81 QA-II-3 Procurement Document Control 0 3/14/75 QA-II-4 Purchasing 1 4/16/76 QA-II-5 Supplier Surveillance 2 3/4/81 QA-II-6 Nonconformances 1 8/11/77 QA-II-7 Corrective Action 1 2/29/80 QA-II-8 Control of Special Processes 2 3/4/81 QA-II-9 Quality Assurance Audits 3 RIO
' :~.
O) .
e hm
- i
, e s o.4an.n paos 2 o, 2 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL sECrion ESA5CO SERVICES encompoMATuo TABLE OF CONTEaIS i
Part III - Construction Site Section Title Rev. No. Date QA-III-l Instructions, Procedures and 2 3/4/81 R9 Drawings QA-III-2 Document Control 2 3/4/81 R9 QA-III-3 Procurement Control 1 -
2/29/80 QA-III-4 Construction Site Procurements 4 3/4/81 R9 QA-III-5 Supplier / Contractor Surveillance 3 3/4/81 R9 QA-III-6 Nonconformances 2 3/4/81 R9 O)
( _
QA-III-7 Corrective Action 2 3/4/81 R9 QA-III-8 Control of Special Processes 1 2/29/80 QA-III-9 Quality Assurance Audits 1 2/29/80 QA-III-10 Identification and Control of Items 1 2/29/80 QA-III-ll Inspection 2 3/4/81 R9 l QA-III-12 Test Control 1 2/29/80 QA-III-13 control of Heasuring and Testing 2 10/20/78 Equipment QA-III-14 Control of Receiving, Handling and 2 3/4/81 R9 Storage
, QA-III-15 Inspection, Test and Operating Status 1 2/29/80 l
Appendix I Terms and Definitions 1 9/30/76 i
l Appendix II Ebasco Positions on U S Nuclear 10/20/78 Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guides i
I e
V
61094/2 75 PAGE I CF I ESASCO SERYlCE5 HUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTloH INCORPORATED SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
( l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION =Evision Addendum 1
- dM/
......<.......y............
TABLE OF CONTENTS oATE 3/4/87 v
PART I - General Section Section Applicability to STP_ Addenddm No. Addendum Date QA-I-1 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-I-2 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-I-3 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-I-4 Delete All N/A N/A QA-I-5 See Addendum 1 3/4/02 QA-I-6 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 PART II - Engineering Offices Delete in its entirety.
PART III - Construction Site Section Section Applicability to STP Addendum No. Addendum Date QA-III-1 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 v' QA-III-2 See_ Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-3 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-4 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-5 See Addendum 1 3/4/82
~QA-III-6 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-7 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-8 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-9 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-10 Implement as Written N/A N/A QA-III-11 See Adde'ndum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-12 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-13 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-14 See Addendum 1 3/4/82 QA-III-15 See Addendum ,
1 3/4/82 i
Appendix I See Addendum 1 3/4/82 Appendix II See Addent.um 1 3/4/82 l
D
~
Oi .
6109 4 /2-75 PAag 1 op 17 g% EBA5CO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION INCORPORATED
> fEfM r T auan e . . esunau couu. RE VIS!ON 5 f
caisr eTau t, apanca s onsam OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM oArc 2/29/80 sr ,- 1.0' SCOPE The purpose of this section is to describe the Quality Assurance Program of Ebasco Services Incorporated and its applicabilit' to safety-related activities and ser-vices performed by Ebasco in the design ar.d construction of nuclear power stations.
This Program has been designed to meet the requirements of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 18 Quality Assurance Criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B. It has also been designed to meet the regulatory position of the following US NRC Regulato'ry ~~
Guides and ANSI Standards, with exceptions and clarifications as stat'ed in Appende'x II of this manual:
- 1. Reg. Guide 1.28 Rev. 0 (6-72) 8. Reg. Guide 1.70 (Chap.17) Rev.2 (9-75)
- 2. " "
1.30 " 0 (8-72) 9 .. 1.74 Rev.0 (2-74)
- 3. "
1.37 " 0 (3-73) 10. 1.88 2 (10-76)
- 4. " "
1.38 " 2 (5-77) 11. 1.94 1 (4-76)
- 5. 1.39 " 2 (9-77) 12. 1.116 OR(5-77)
- 6. "
1.58 0 (8-73) 13. 1.123 1 (7-77)
- 7. 1.64 2 (6-76) 14. Standard N45.2.12, Draft 3, 4 (2-74)
{
!,V )"'able I-1.1 provides Assurance Program a matriy,which Manual shows the that correspond sections.of to the the Ebasco requirements Nuclear of 10CFR50, Quality Appendix B and US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.28, Rev. O. The Ebasco Quality Assurance Program is comprised of: The Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual, written corporate policies, procedures, departmental instructions, and drawings related to quality., Table I-1.2 provides a matrix of the principal implementing procedures with 10CFR50, Appendix B. Table I-1.3 is a listing of these procedures by title.
The Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual has been designed to meet the requirements of 10CFR50.34 (7) for a quality assurance program description. It will be incorporated into applicable portions of safety analysis reports by reference as provided by 10CFR50.32.
The Ebasco Quality Program is in force at Ebasco Engineering Offices and Construction Operations. Ebasco Engineering Offices are those district organized units where design, engineering, procurement and related functions are performed. Construction Operations encompass those activities related to the construction of a nuclear power station. Ebasco's responsibility for implementing the Ebasco Quality Program shall begin at the commencement of activities affecting quality and shall end with the turn-over of completed systems to the Client.
Definitions pertaining to the Ebasco Quality Program are listed in Appendix I of this manual. ,
2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEERING 2.1 The Ebasco Quality Assurance Engineering Department is responsible for g }
establishing new, and updating existing quality assurance requirements. In V addition, this department is responsible to administer and enforce the implemen-tation of the Ebasco Quality Assurance Manual.
i
69094A/2 75 PAGE oF 17 p NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SE CTION
( EBASCO SERVICES INCoR POR ATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QA-I-l 3.0 QUALITY PROGRAM COMMITTEE 3.1 The Ebasco Quality Program Committee is responsible for and has authority to make and approve procedures for any changes to this Manual.
This committee is comprised of representatives of the Nuclear, Engineering, Construction, Projects, Purchasing, Consulting Engineering and Plant Operations and Betterment Departments. These representatives are appointed by the Vice President of the respective department.
The Director of Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance is desig-nated by the Senior Vice President Nuclear as the Chairman of the Quality Program Committee. A member of Quality Assurance Engineering shall be designated by the Chairman as Quality Program Coordinator, who shall function as the Quality Program Committee's secretary and be a member of the Committee.
The Chief Quality Assurance Engineer is designated by the Senior Vice President Nuclear as a permanent representative of the Nuclear Department on the Quality Program Committee.
The Committee shall be responsible for and shall have authority to make
/sg any changes to the policies and procedures of the Ebasco Quality Program.
( ) All changes or revisions to the Ebasco Quality Program shall be processed through the Quality Program Committee by the Quality Program Coordinator.
3.2 Ebasco Quality Program Procedures document the various significant activities of the Quality Program that are the direct responsibility of the Quality Program Committee or the Quality Program Coordinator.
These procedures include but are not limited to the following activities:
3.2.1 Quality Program Procedure No. 4 entitled, QUALITY PROGRAM
- COORDINATOR - DESCRIPTION OF POSITION, DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES.
i 3.2.2 Quality Program Procedure No. 5 entitled, DEVIATING EBASCO l PROJECT - RELATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS FROM THE EBASCO l NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL. This provides for l control of such deviations by requiring execution of an authori-zation form involving approval of specified authorities to assure, among other things, that safety and/or quality will not be sacrificed.
3.2.3 Quality Program Procedure No. 6 entitled, ASSIGNMENT, DISTRIBUTION AND CONTROL OF THE EBASCO NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURMCE PROGRAM MANUAL.
3.2.4 Quality Program Procedure No. 7 entitled, REVISIONS TO THE EBASCO NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL.
O
41094 A/2 78 PAGE 3 or 12 p) E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM SECTION QA-I-l 4.0 GENERAL 4.1 Section QA-I-2 of this Manual describes the organizational structure, functional responsibilities, levels of authority and lines of internal and external communication for management, direction and execution of the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program. In his letter of October 1, 1974, Ebasco's Senior Vice-President Nuclear mandates the company-wide use of the policies, manuals and procedures that make up the Ebasco Quality Program.
4.2 It shall be the responsibility of each Ebasco department and the individual personnel of that department to adhere to the requirements of this Program. Section QA-II-1 and QA-III-l of this Manual require these departments to develop and control instructions, procedures and/
or drawings which describe the manner in which activities aft'ecting quality are to be accomplished. When documented evidence is required for the satisfactory performance of these activities, checklists, forms and/or other appropriate means shall provide this evidence. The docu-ments which contain the procedures used to implement the Ebasco QA Program are:
4.2.1 Engineering Department Office Practices and Procedures Man-
% ual
\' 4.2.2 Quality Assurance Engineering Department-Quality Assurance Procedures Manual 4.2.3 Quality Assurance Engineering Department- Site Quality Assurance Procedures Manual 4.2.4 Nuclear Licensing Department Procedures Manual 4.2.5 Manual of Vendor Quality Assurance Procedures 4.2.6 Nuclear Quality Control Site Procedures Manual 4.2.7 Purchasing Department Practices and Procedures Manual The above listed manuals may also contain departmental working procedures which do not describe activities affecting quality and therefore are not governed by the requirements of this Manual.
4.3 In addition to the requirements of Sections QA-II-l and QA-III-1 and paragraph 4.2 above, Sections QA-II-8 and QA-III-8 further assure control over quality related activities by requiring that special processes shall be performed in accordance with written qualified procedures, and that they shall be performed only by qualified personnel.
~
All qualifications shall be in accordance with applicable codes, standards, pg specifications and other requirements as applicable. The Ebasco Quality
( Program provides for the verification of quality requirements through N-- written policies, procedures and instructions for the performance of inspections and tests. These inspections and tests are performed on Ebasco purchased items as well as on services supplied by Ebasco. All inspections shall be performed by individuals other than those who performed the activity.
sm anos
- Ace 4 or.12.
lq) EBA5CO SERVICES
- "" "^'"
NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QA-I-l 4.4 In order to extend the control of activities affecting quality to the supplier level, suppliers of Ebasco purchased items and services shall be R3 evaluated with respect to quality assurance capability in accordance with the requirements of Secton QA-I-5. QA-I-5 requires Ebasco suppliers to have in effect quality programs that meet the requirements of 100FR50 Appendix B and ANSI N45.2 that are applicable to the items being purchased. Items shall not be purchased from suppliers that do not meet the applicable requirements of Section QA-I-5.
In addition to the initial quality assurance evaluation of suppliers the Ebasco Quality Program provides for the in process surveillance of items in the supplier's shops. This surveillance program is described in Sections QA-II-5 and QA-III-5.
5.0 INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING 5.1 Section QA-I-3 provides for the company-wide indoctrination and training of Hbasco personnel egaged in activities subject to the requirements of the R3 Ebasco Quality Program. This training program is designed to assure the proper understanding and proper implementation of the Ebasco Quality Program require-ments by Ebasco personnel. The training program consists of " Units of Instruc-F tion" dealing with various topics pertinent to quality assurance.
Cj 5.2 Schedules for the presentation of all " Units of Instruction" shall be developed and maintained in accordance with Section QA-I-3. This schedule shall include, as appropriate, the setting of tentative dates for the present-ation of all " Units of Instruction".
5.3 The Manpower Planning and Development Department cnd the Quality Assur-j ance Engineering Department shall be responsible to implement the quality r assurance training for the company. Quality Assurance Engineering shall be R3 responsible to ascertain that indoctrination and training in quality assur- '
y ance is in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-I-3 of this Manual.
5.3.1 The, Quality Assurance Engineering Department shall be responsible '
for establishing the content of material subject to the Quality Assur- '
, ance Training Program as defined in the Nuclear Quality Assurance Program '
Manual. The Quality Assurance Engineering Department will stipulate re- R3 .
quired training for recipient departments and/or individuals, providing f thei tecnnical expertise during the development phase of the program. '
/
The Manpower Planning and Development Department shall be responsible '
s for' the development and documentation of Quality Assurance training of '
a generic multi-discipline nature. Scheduling and presentation will be '
,', coordinated by the Manpower Planning and Development Department with '
input from appropriate recipient departments and the Quality Assurance p Engineering Department. '
(' The Quality Assurance Engineering Department will notify the Manpower i Planning and Development Department of any changes in existing material which will' require actlan on the part of the Manpower Planning and .
Development Department. .
/" -
/
f./
.( Y - l J? - l_ .
slos4 A/2 7s Pact 5 or 12 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION m
[ < EBASCO SERVICE 5 C/ "' C 0 " " 0 " ^ T E QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QA-I-1 Quality Assurance training unique to a department shall be defined by that department, who with the Manpower Planning and Development Department shall develop the training program and provide the technical expertise. Individual departments remain respons.ible for scheduling and presenting such departmental Quality Assurance training, and for providing the Manpower Planning and Development with appropriate record documentation.
6.0 REVIEW OF QUALITY PROGRAM ADEQUACY 6.1 The adequacy of the Ebasco Quality Program is reviewed on a regular basis. The determination of program adequacy is based on audit results and trend analyses. Sections QA-II-9 and QA-III-9 provide for the performance and followup of audits by Quality Assurance Engineering and of audits of the Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance functions.
6.2 Audits performed by Quality Assurance Engineering are designed to evaluate the Quality Program effectiveness on a project basis.
When corrective action is necessary, re-audits are scheduled to assure
,y '
impicmentation of corrective action. Section QA-II-9 de' fines review
( ) activities and reports involved in the auditing function.
G/ '
6.3 Information on audits performed by Quality Assurance Engineering shall be submitted continuously to the Quality Program Coordinator.
He shall turn these over to the Quality Assurance Engineering Internal 5 Audit Supervisor who shall make an analysis of the available quality
- assurance data with respect to quality trends in accordance with Quality Assurance Engineering Procedure QA-D.3 and formally report his findings to the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer and the Chairmat of the Quality Program Committee. The Senior Vice President Nuclear and the Quality Program Committee shall be responsible for initiating l the implementation of any changes or corrective action deemed necessary to improve the effectiveness of the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program.
1
/ s l t l N._ I
._ __ -- . . . . . - _ _ _ . . . - . . - . . . - - . - - =
i oces 6 c, J enseane.n HUCLEAR QUALITY AS5URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTNDN esAsco seavices QA-I-1 inconnoaatso.
QUALITY ASSURAI;CE PROGRAM MATRIX OF COMPLIANCE TO USNRC 10 CFR 50 APPENDIX B AND ANSI N45.2
)'
TABLE I-1.1 10CFR50 ANSI N45.2 EBASCO NUCLEAR QUALITY APPENDIX B. CRITERIA PARAGRAPH ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION I 3 QA-I-2 II 2 QA-I-1, QA-I-3 III 4 QA-I-4 IV 5 QA-II-3, QA-III-3 V 6 QA-II-1, QA-III-1 VI 7 QA-II-2, QA-III-2 VII 8 QA-I-5, QA-II-2, QA-II-4, QA-III-2, QA-III-4 VIII 9 QA-III-10 IX 10 QA-II-8, QA-III-8 X 11 QA-II-5, QA-III-5, QA-III-11 l
XI 12 QA-III-12 XII 13 QA-III-13 XIII 14 QA-III-14 XIV 15 QA-III-15 XV 16 QA-II-6, QA-III-6 XVI 17 QA-II-7, QA-III-7 XVII 18 QA-I-6 XVIII 19 QA-II-9, QA-III-9 O
O -
O O p
. TAggg 3-3.2 I N MATRIX OF COMPU ANCE OF FBINCIPAL IMPLDtENT11ec j FROCEDURES TO 10CFR50 AFFEMDIX S Vendor Qual. .
Administrative Engiacering 1.iccasing Wuclear Purchasing Project Quality Assurance Constructice Quality Assur. Dept. .
(A-) (E-) (L-) (N-) Deft (FD-) Dept (FJ-) (QA-) Deft. Progree (QF-) (VQAD-)Proced- .
Crit er ton Procedures Procedures Procedures Procedures Procedures Procedu m Procedures Procedures Procedures ures .
1 -21 QS-2 .
!! QS-l.QS-3 -4.- . 6.-7 111 -1.-2.-7.-8.-9.-15 -0.-l.-2.-3 -D.I.-D.2 QS-4 Qs-8
-21.-30.-45 -52.-68.-69 -7.-8 .
-72.-74.-76.-82 -86 .
ly -8.-19 -3.-5.-6.-10 -D.I.-D.2.-F.6 QS-6 .
-11 .
V -1 -7 -23 -C.1.-C.2.-P.1 QS-1 VI -1.-42 -2.-3.-6.-7.-8.-9.-15 -C.1.-C.2.-S.3.-S.9 05-5 *
-21.-65 -73.-82.-86
-89 s vil -89 -6 4 3.-P I.-P.5.-P.9.-S.10 QS-6.QS-7 -1 through-13 3
-15.-17.-18.-19 .5 j 9ggy -S.12.-S.13.-S.14.-S.16 QC.3 ,
j -S.18.-S.21.-S.22 .
I II -73 -P.I.-P.7.-F.12.-S.16.-S.17 QC-3 .
-S.18.-S.19.-S.20
- 1 -C. 3.1.-C.3. 2.-P. 5.-P.12 '
QC-7-QS-6
! xi -2 -C.3.2.-P.i.-F.5 QC-3 I
- III -S.8 QC-6 '
1111 -F.1.-S.S.-S.6 QC5 IIV -P.I.-P.5 QC-3
- XV -72 -F. 3.-S . 7 QC-1
- XVI -72 -D. 3.-P. 3.-S.7 QC-2
- XVII -l -D. S.-C. 3.-C 4.-P. 9.-P.12 QS-5 *
, -S.3.-S.4.-S.10 e i XVIII -45 -D.5 -D.5.1.-C.3.-P.9 QC-3 i
-S. 2.-S. 3.-S. 5.-S.6 '
-S.8 thru - S.22 '
l
stos4A/2 75 PAGe R 0 F M .._
MUCLEAR QUALITY A550RANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
[ EBASCO SEFtvlCE5 sucompenArco QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QA-I-1 TABLE I-1.3 '
PRINCIPAL IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Procedure Former ,
No. No. Title ,
A-1 E-33 Procedures - Authorization and Preparation '
A-42 E-34 Distribution of Engineering Department Manuals and Guides A-45 E-58 Ebasco Management Q/A Audit Committee Procedure '
E- 1 E-16 Review of Vendors Drawings -
E-2 E-23 Release of Drawings for Fabricstion and Construction E-3 E-30 Procedure for Controlling Original Drawings Requisitioned from the Drawing Files Room ,
E-6 E-6 Processing of Manufacturers Reproducibles through the '
EMDRAC System (New York Office) '
i E-7 E-71 Processing Drawings for Review and Approval E-8 E-72 Approval Signatures Required on Ebasco Drawings '
O E-9 E-15 E-78 E-11 Processing Conceptual Design Documents for Review and Approval R5 Preparation of Ebasco Standard Specifications '
e t
E-19 E-43 Documentation, Processing and Resolution of Specification '
Technical Questions from Bidders '
E-21 E-73 Processing Project Equipment Specifications for Review and Approval ' ,
E-30 E-61 Preparation of Calculations '
E-45 E-26 Preparation of Safety Analysis Reports and Establishment of Design Bases for Nuclear Projects .
E-52 E-52 Coordination of NSSS Interfaces '
E-65 E-35 Control of Project Related Design Documents E-68 E-20 Division of Responsibility Between Disciplines !
E-69 E-37 Design Change Notice / Field Change Request E-72 E-44 Control of a Nonconformance by a Vendor i t
t E-74 E-74 The Use and Documentation of Sketches e E-76 E-50 Guidelines for Design Verification '
b
\ E-82 (Co.P)28 Ebasco Site Support Engineering Operation v
sios4a/s.7s ,,,, 9 ,, 12 NUCLEAR QUALITY A55URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBASCO SERvlCE5 mcommonateo QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QA-I-1 TABLE I-1.3 ,
(Cont'd) ,
Procedure Former ,
No. No. Title ,
E-86 E-19 Processing Inquiry Memorandum, Purchase Requisition, Contract ,
And Supplements ,
E-15 Expanded Purchasing Program Including Proposal Evaluation '
E-89 f
L-0 Preparation and Control of Nuclear Licensing Department '
L-0 Procedures '
L-1 L-1 SAR Preparation L-2 L-2 SAR Amendment Preparation '
L-3 L-3 Processing SAR Change Requests ',
L-7 L-7 . Nuclear Safety Design Review '
L-8 L-8 Preparation of Radiological Impact Assessments ',
~~ N-21 (Co.P)19 Kuclear Quality Program Authorization and Implementation ,
g ,,/ N-23 (Co.P)21 Reporting a Defect / Noncompliance to the NRC PD-3 P-1 Development of Project Bidders List R5 PD-5 P-2 Preparation of Inquiry and Supplements and Distribution of Quotations ,
I f
PD-6 E-27 Early Procurement of Critical Materials ,
PD-10 P-3 Quotation Evaluation and Recommendation to Purchase PD- 11 P-4 Preparation of Purchase Orders and Supplements ,
PJ-1 E-4 Filing System - Nuclear Projects PJ-2 Project Communications '
QA-G.1 QA-G.1 Preparation and Control of Quality Assurance Engineering i Department Procedures e QA-G.2 QA-G.2 Control and Distribution of Project-Related Manuals f QA-G.3 QA-G.3 Qualification of QA Audit Personnel i 0A-G.3.1 QA-G.3.1 Requirements for the Qualification / Experience Review
- and Certification of Designated Level III QC Individuals ,'
[ ) OA-C.3.2 Qualification of QA/QC Personnel to ANSI N45.2.6 Requirements ,
QA-G.4 QA-G.4 Quality Assurance Engineering Records t
s io,4 a /a.7s ,,og 10 o, 12 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ESA5CO SERVICES meoaaoaateo QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QA-I-1 TABLE I-1.3 '
(Cont'd) '
Procedure Former '
No. No. Title '
t QA-D.1 QA-D.1 Review of Safety-Related Component Specifications '
QA-D.2 QA-D.2 Review of Engineering Drawings [
Determination and Analysis of Quality Trends
- QA-D.3 QA-D.3 QA-D.5 QA-D.5 Internal Audits ,
QA-D.5.1 QA-D.5.1 Internal Auditing of Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives '
I QA-P.1 QA-P.1 Review of Vendor's Procedures '
QA-P.3 QA-P.3 Review of Nonconformances [
QA-P.5 QA-P.5 Requirements for Preparation, Implementation and Control '
of QA P'.ans '
QA-P.6 QA-P.6 Evaluation of Bid Exceptions [
QA-P.7 QA-P 7 Review of Nondestructive Examination (NDE) Procedures.
R5 w/ QA-P.9 QA-P.9 Quality Assurance Vendor Evaluations QA-P.12 Procedure for Review of Radiographic Pilm Submittals '
QA-P.12 I
QA S-1 Planning of Site QA Engineering Activities '
QA S-1 QA S-2 QA S-2 Ceneral Audit Procedure ,
QA S-3 QA S-3 Processing of QA Engineering Audit Reports '
QA S-4 QA S-4 Quality Assurance Records Audit f QA S-5 QA S-5 Material Receipt Audit '
QA S-6 QA S-6 Material and Component Storage Audit ,
QA S-7 QA S-7 Processing of Nonconformance Reports '
i i QA S-8 QA S-8 Calibration and Gage Control Audit ,
l QA S-9 QA S-9 Document Control Audit '
QA S-10 QA S-10 Vendor Documentation Audit ,'
QA S-11 System Turnover Audit '
QA S-11 QA S-12 QA S-12 Civil Activities Audit {
l_ QA S-13 QA C-13 Structural Steel Audit '
i QA S-14 QA S-14 Reinforcing Steel Audit
, p QA S-15 QA S-15 Protective Coating Audit l
sioe4an.n paos 11 or 12 5 ""
3 3 incommoaateo QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QA-I-1 TABLE I-1.3 (Cont'd) '
Procedure Former No. No. Title '
QA S-16 QA S-16 Welding Material Control Audit ,
QA S-17 QA S-17 Welder Qualifications Audit QA S-18 QA S-18 Mechanical and Welding Audit ,
QA S-19 QA S-19 Nondestructive Examination Audit ',
QA S-20 QA S-20 Radiographs Review Audit ,
QA S-21 QA S-21 Electrical Activities Aziit QA S-22 QA S-22 Instrumentation Activities Audit ,
QA S-23 QA S-23 Quality Assurance Instructions '
QC-1 QC-8 Nonconformances '
QC-2 QC-9 Corrective Action ,
QC-3 QC-10 Inspection and Test Control QC-4 QC-11 Control of Measuring and Testing Equipment ,
QC-12 Receiving, Handling and Storage R5 QC-5 QP-4 gp.4 Quality Program Ccordinator-Description of Position, Duties, ,'
Responsibilities e, QP-5 QP-5 Deviating Ebasco Project-Related Quality Assurance Prograns ,
from the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual ,
QP-6 QP-6 Assignment, Distribution and Control of the Ebasco Nuclear I Quality Assurance Program Manual '
QP-7 QP-7 Revisions to the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program ,
Manual ,
QS-1 QC-1 Preparation, Control and Distribution of Construction .
Department Standards ,
QS-2 QC-2 Organization and Responsibilities, Construction Department Staff QS-3 QC-3 Indoctrination and Training ,
QS-4 QC-4 Design Change Control
, QS-5 QC-6 Document Control ,
QS-6 QC-7 Procurement Control - Field Purchase Orders '
i QS-7 Construction Contracting ,
QS-8 Design Control Review of Specifications and Drawings '
sio,4 a n.n Paos 12 or 12 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN EBA5CO SERVICE 5 4
Q mconconayto QUALITY ASSURANCE 1ROGRAM QA-I-1 TABLE I-1.3 .
(Cont'd) ,
Procedure Former i No. No. Title .
VQAD-1 VQAD-1 Procedure for Assignment of Purchase Orders and Sub-Orders '
for Examination Nuclear Safety Related Equipment and '
Designated Equipment VOAD-2 VQAD-2 Procedure for Assignment 7f Purchase Orders and Sub-Orders e for Examination Fossil Fuel Plants and Non-Nuclear Safety i Class Equipment i VQAD-3 Transmittal, Distribution and Usb of Quality Assurance Plan '
VQAD-3 for Vendors, Manufacturers, Contractors and Associated '
Quality Assurance Forms '
VQAD-4 VQAD-4 The Use of Form 719-QA-W " Quality Assurance Repor" VQAD-5 VQAD-5 . Setting Up and Maintaining Purchase Order File '
VQAD-6 VQAD-6 Processing Quality Assurance Non-Conformance Report Form 6009-11 ,
Follow-Up of Non-Conformance and Review of Vender Rework Records e R5 VQAD-7 VQAD-7 Use of " Problems That Require Resolution" Form VQAD-8 VQAD-8 Preparation and Control of Vendor Quality Assurance Report e Release for Shipment Form No. 1305
- VQAD-9 VQAD-9 Review and Processing Quality Assurance Reports Form 719-QA-W l VQAD-10 VQAD-10 Preparation and Control of Implementing Procedures
- VQAD-11 VQAD-11ReviewofRadiographsbyVendorQualityAssuranceRepresentativec[
VQAD-12 VQAD-12 Nocification of Material Shipped Without Release e VQAD-13 '
VQAD-13 Feview of Vendor Documentation Setting up and Maintaining Purchase Order Files in '
VQAD-15 -
New York Office. '
t
- Interface between Vendor Quality Assurance and Quality '
VQAD-17 Assurance Engineering Departments '
Interface between Vendor Quality Assurance and Materials '
VQAD-18 -
Application Departments '
1 Qualification of Inspection, Examination and Testing Personnel '
VQAD-19 -
for Nuclear Facilities. '
e
. , ,, f, .7. ,41e 1 cr 10 EBASCO SERVICE 5 NUCLEAR QUALITY A%URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTloM INCOMPORATED QA-I-1 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT fm) j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION neviuou Addendum 1 f< .ygjwj
...... .. fr ..............
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
- 1. Paragraph 1.0 revise to the following:
1.0 SCOPE The purpose of this section is to describe the Quality Assurance Program of Ebasco Services Incorporated and its applicability to safety-related activities and services performed by Ebasco in the construction of South Texas Project.
This program has been designed to meet the applicable requirements of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 18 Quality Assurance Criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B. It has also been designed to meet the regulatory position of the following US NRC Regulatory Guides and ANSI Standards, with exceptions and clari-fications as stated in Appendix II of this manual:
STANDARD TITLE ANSI N.45.2-1971 Quality Assurance Program Requirements R.G. 1.28 (Rev.0,6/72) for Nuclear Facilities ANSI N.45.2.1-1973 Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Asso-y R.G.1.37 (Rev. 0,3/73) ciated Components During Construction (See Appendix II Notes 3 through 5) Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.2-1972 Package, Shipping, Receiving, Storage R.G. 1.38 (Rev. 0,3/73) and Handling of Items for Nuclear (See Appendix II Notes 6 through 11) Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.3 1973 Housekeeping During the Construction R.G.1.39 (Rev. 0,3/73) Phase of Nuclear Power Plants (See Appendix II Notes 12 and 13)
ANSI N.45.2.4-1972 Installation, Inspection and Testing R.G. 1.30 (Rev. 0,8/72) Requirements for Instrumentation and (See Appendix II Notes 14 and 15) Electric Equipment During the Con-straction of Nuclear Power Generating '
Stations ANSI N.45.2.5-1974 Supplementary Quality Assurance Re-(See Appendix II Notes 1 and 2) quirements for Installation, Inspec-tion and Testing of Structural Con-crete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants O{
V.
.ios en.7s Paca 2 erl EBASco SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioM INCORPORATED QA-I-1
-p -- SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
'; ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION ,,,,,ouAddendum 1 f .. f g A .......... QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM ,y, 3f4fpp
. . . . . . . . .y . . .
~ STANDARD TITLE ANSI N.45.2.6-1973 Qualifications of Inspection, Examina-R.G. 1.58 (Rev. 0,8/73) tion and Testing of Personnel for the Plus Positions C.5, C.6, C.7, Construction Phase of Nuclear Power C.8 and C.10 of Rev. 1 Plants ANSI N.45.2.8-1975 Supplementary Quality Assurance Re-Reg. 1.116 (6/76) quirements for Installation, Inspec-(See Appendix II Notes 16 through 18) tion and Testing of Mechanical Equip-ment and Systems for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.9-1974 Requirements for Collection, Storage R.G. 1.88 (Rev. 2,10/76) and Maintenance of Quality Assurance (See Appendix II Notes 19 through 21) Records for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.10-1973 Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions R.G. 1.74 (rev. 0,2/74)
U ANSI N.45.2.12-1977 Requiremen.ts for Auditing of Quality R.G. 1.144 (Rev. 1,9/80) Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.13-1976 Quality Assurance Requirements for R.G. 1.123 (10/76) Control.of Procurement of Items and (See Notes 22 through 26) Services for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.23-1978 Qualifications of Quality Assurance R.g. 1.14.6 (Rev. 0,8/80) Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants Table I-1.1 provides a matrix which shows the sections of the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual that correspond to the requirements of 10CFR50.
Appendix B and US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.28, Rev. O. The Ebasco Quality As-surance Program is comprised of: The Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual, written corporate policies, procedures, departmental instructions, and drawings related to quality. Table I-1.2 provides a matrix of the principal implementing procedures with 10 CFR50, Appendix B. Table I-1.3 is a listing of these procedures by . title. .
a i .
sm4n.7s Paes 3 cr 10 E5ASCO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SEcTioM INCORPOR AT ED QA-I-1 n SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
! l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION navmonAddendum 1
[b
........ ... w ..............
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM oAre 3/4/82 The Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual has been designed to meet the requirements of 10CFR50.34 (7) for a quality assurance program description.
It will be incorporated into applicable portions of safety analysis reports by reference as provided by 10CFR50.32.
The Ebasco Quality Program for STPEGS is in force at Ebasco Office and Con-struction Oparations. Ebasco Engineering Office is an organized unit where engineering, procurement and related functions are performed. Construction Operation encompasses those activities related to the construction of a nu-clear power station. Ebasco's responsibility for implementing the Ebasco Quality Program shall begin at the conmencement of activities affecting quality and shall end with the turnover of completed systems to the Client.
Definitions pertaining to the Ebasco Quality Program are listed in Appendix I of this manual.
- 2. Paragraph 4.2 p I
- a. Second sentence, third line: Delete reference to Section QA-II-1.
I V b. Subparagraph 4.2.1. Delete all.
- c. Subparagraph 4.2.4: Delete all.
- 3. Paragraph 4.3
- a. First sentence, first and second lines: Delete references to Sections QA-II-1 and QA-II-8.
- b. Next to last sentence, third line'up: Add after "Ebasco purchased items," the following: ...and serviges..."
- 4. Paragraph 4.4
- a. Sixth line, add after " Items" the following:
...and services..."
- b. Last line: Delete reference to Section QA-II-5.
~
p) -
( t
- 5. Paragraph 6.1, third line: Delete reference to Section QA-II-9.
V ' ' 6. Paragraph 6.2, last sentence: Delete all.
i sios4n.7s Pace 4 c, 10 EBASCO SERYlCES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION incQRPORATED .
QA-I-1 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATI0tl ,,y,s,ouAddendum.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DATE 3/4/82
- 7. ' TABLE I-1.1: Revise to the following:
_ TABLE I-1.1 10CFR50 ANSI N45.2 EBASCO NUCLEAR QUALITY APPENDIX B. CRITERIA PARAGRAPH ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION I 3 QA-I-2 II 2 QA-I-1, QA-I-3 IV 5 QA-III-3 V 6 QA-III-1 l VI ,
7 QA-III-2 VII 8 QA-I-5, QA-III-2, QA-III-4
.VIII 9 QA-III-10 IX 10 QA-III-8 X 11 QA-III-5,QA-III-11 XI 12 QA-III-12 XII 13 QA-III-13 XIII 14 QA-III-14 XIV 15 QA-III-15 XV 16 QA-III-6 i
XVI 17 QA-III-7 XVII 18 QA-I-6 XVIII 19 QA-III-9 V
l -
~
o b a
- v .
C c0
. o' -
s o s m I "U 4
< r N o < m I r Table I-1.2: Revise to the following:
U 9 9
$ U $ % VE'iDC1 QL'AL.
w w < ADMINISTFATIVE NUCL EAR PURCHASING QUALITY ASSURANCE C0isircCTICN ;NAL ITY ASSUR. DEri.
" " O (A-1) (N-) DEPT (PD-) (QA-) DEPT. PiiCSEAtt (QP-) (VQ*D-) PEG-CRITERION PROCEDURES PROCEDURES PROCEDURES PROCEDURES PROCEDUFES PRCCEDURES CECtRE S
.J
< ! -21 QS-2 3
II Q5-1,05-3 -4.-5,-6 -7
- n-o R
$ IV -3.-5,-6.-10 -D.1,-D.2,-P.6 QS-6 ce O H<
[ @ -11 o
g o$ w Q V -1 -23 -G.I.-G.2 -P.1 QS-1 0- >
y OE ce
- c. -
d=
VI -1,-42 -G.1,-G.2,-S.3,
-S.9 05-5 H <
m< ce a < c4 m VII -6 -G.3.-P.1.-P,5, 05-6,05-7 -1 thres;h 13.
$ Uy $ -P.9.-5-10 - 15 ,- 17. - 13.-l 4 Hw <
gxHu C 3
H VIII - S .12.- S .13, -5.14,
-S.16.-S.18.-S.21 QC-3 8 o- -S.22
< o ce J 2 mH v < IX -P.1,-P.7,-P-12, QC-3 v D -S.16.-S.17.-S.18 tu w X
-S.19.-S.26
-G.3.1.-G.3.2,-P.5, QC-3,QS-6 d -P.12, a XI -G.3.2,-P.1,-P.5, QC-3 I
XII -S.8 00-4
. XIII -P.I -S.5,-5.6 CC-5
- XIV -P.1.-P.5 QC-3 j
=
XV -P.3.-S.7 QC-1
,, XVI -D.3.-P.3 S.7 CC-2 Co XVII D.5,-G.3.-G.4, 05-5 uu -P.9,-P.12,-5.3,
> h ;. -S.4 -S.10
$;e
- XVI!! -45 - D . 5,-D . 5.1. -G . 3 - P . 9, QC-3 ag .k -S.2 -S.3.-S.5,-S.6 oe *
- -S.8 thru -S.22 UO j
- y ', 3
$ 0- E R
y 1v A otidd y O O O
l sios4n.n page 6 er 10 _ l EBA5CO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTloM i l
inconeonAvco QA-I-1 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT j
[3 ELECTRIC GEllERATIf4G STATI0fl navisonAddendum 1 3/4/82
% [.....M/*w m .. y .............. QUALITY ASSURAtlCE PROGRAM
"^"
- 9. TABLE I-1.3: Revise to the following:
TABLE I-1.3-PRIflCIPAL IMPLEMEfiTIflG PROCEDURES Procedure fonner fio. fio . TITLE A-1 E-33 Procedures - Authorization and Preparation A-45 E-58 Ebasco Management QA Audit Committee Procedure
. ft-21 (Co.P)19 fiuclear Quality Program Authorization and Imple-mentation N-23 (Co.P)21 Reporting'a Defect /floncompliance to the NRC PD-3 P-1 Development of Project Bidders List N PD-5 P-2 Preparation of Inquiry and Supplements and Distri-bution of Quotations PD-6 E-27 Early Procu.rement of Critical Materials
. PD-10 P-3 Quotation Evaluationand Recommendation to Purchase PD-11 P-4 Preparation of Purchase Orders and Supplements.
QA-G.1 QA-G.1 Preparation and' Control of Quality Assurance En-gineering Department Procedures QA-G.2 QA-G.2 Control and Distribution of Project-Related Manuals QA-G.3 QA-G.3 Qualification of QA Audit Personnel QA-G.3.1 QA-G.3.1 Requirements for the Qualification / Experience Re '
view and Certification of Designated Level III QC Individuals QA-G.3.2 --
Qualification of QA/QC Personnel to ANSI f145.2.6 Requirements s.J . ,
sio,sn.7s Pace 7 or 10 EBASCo 5ERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN lHCORPORATED ,{,}
m SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
) ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION newsouAddendum 1
{
"^'"
[........ QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
. Procedure Fonner No. No. TITLE QA-G.4 QA-G.4 Quality Assurance Engineering Records QA-D.3 QA-D.3 Determination and Analysis of Quality Trends QA-D.5 QA-D.5 Internal Audits QA-D.5.1 QA-D.5.1 Internal Auditing of Vendor Quality Assurance Repre-sentatives QA-P.1 QA-P.1 Review of Vendor's Procedures QA-P.3 QA-P.3 Review of Nonconformances QA-P.5 QA-P.5 Requirements for Preparation, Implementation and Con-
. trol of QA Plans O
V QA-P.6 QA-P.6 Evaluation of Bid Exceptions QA-P.7 QA-P.7 Review of Nondestructi.ve. Examination (NDE) Procedures QA-P.9 QA-P.9 Quality Assurance Vendor Evaluations QA-P.12 QA-P.12 Procedure for Review of Radiographic Film Submittals QA-S-1 QA-S-1 Planning of Site QA Engineering Activities QA-S-2 QA-S-2 General Audit Procedure QA-S-3 QA-S-3 Processing of QA Engineering Audit Reports QA-S-4 QA-S-4 Quality Assurance Records Audit QA-S-5 QA-S-5 Material Receipt Audit QA-S-6 QA-S-6 Material and Component Storage Audit QA-S-7 QA-S-7 Processing of Nonconformance Reports QA-S-8 QA-5-8 Calibration and Gage Control Audit QA-S-9 QA-S-9 Document Control Audit -
O V
~
i sios en.n caes 8 cr 10. j ESA5CO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN mconeonarzo QA-I-1 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
[m\ l ELECTRIC GENERATIllG STATION , ,,y,sio,, Addendum 1 i
MM
....,...u,,,f.............. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
- ^'" 3/4/R2 Procedure Fonner No. No. TITLE QA-S-10 QA-S-10 VerAr Documentation Audit QA-S-11 QA-S-11 System Turnover Audit QA-S-12 QA-S-12 Civil Activities Audit QA-S-13 QA-S-13 Structural Steel Audit QA-S-14 QA-S-14 Reinforcing Steel Audit QA-S-15 QA-S-15 Protective Coating Audit QA-S-16 QA-5-16 Welding Material Control Audit QA-S-17 QA-S-17 Welder Qualifications Audit QA-S-18 QA-S-18 Mechanical and Welding Audit
\ QA-S-19 QA-S-19 Nondestructive Examination Audit QA-S-20 QA-S-20 Radiographs Review Audit QA-S-21 QA-S-21 Electrical Activities Audit QA-S-22 -QA-S-22 Instrumentation Activities Audit QA-S-23 QA-S-23 Quality Assurance ' Instructions QC-1 QC-8 Nonconfonnances QC-2 QC-9 Corrective Acti'on QC-3 QC-10 Inspection and Test Control -
QC-4 QC-11 Control of Measuring and Tc ting Equipment QC-5 QC-12 Receiving, Handling and Storage QP-4 QP-4 Quality Program Coord-nator - Description o.f Position, Duties and Responsibilities.
,-s .
QP-5 QP-5 Deviating Ebasco Project-Related Quality Assurance TI Programs from the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance (V Program Manual
l 81094/2 75 pat 9u in EBA5Co SERYlCES NUCLEAR QUALITY A%URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTloM iwcon Por. Ar n o QA-I-1 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT p ,
ELECTRIC GENERATING STATI0tl navisio,i Addendum 1 g fgg QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM ,,,, 3f4fgp
<.......m...y............
Procedure Fomer No. No. TITLE
~
QP-6 QP-6 Assignment, Distribution and Control of the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual QP-7 QP-7 Revisions to the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual QS-1 QC-1 Preparation, Control and Distribution of Construction Department Standards QS-2 QC-2 Organization and Responsibilities, Contruction De-partment Staff QS-3 QC-3 Indoctrination and Training QS-5 ,
QC-6 Document Control QS-6 QC-7 Procurement Control - Field Purchase Orders QS-7 --
Construction Contracting.
VQAD-1 VQAD-1 Procedure for Assignment of Purchase Orders and Sub-Orders for Examination Nuclear Safety Related Equip-ment and Designated Equipment VQAD-2 VQAD-2 Procedure for Assignment of Purchase Orders and Sub-Orders for Examination Fossil Fuel Plants and Non-N.uclear Safety Class Equipment VQAD-3 VQAD-3 Transmittal, Distribution and Use of Quality Assurance Plan for Vendors,Ilanufacturers, Contractors and Asso-ciated Quality Assurance Foms VQAD-4 VQAD-4 The Use of Form 719-QA-W " Quality Assurance Report" VQAD-5 VQAD-5 Setting Op and Maintaining Purchase Order File VQAD-6 VQAD-6 Processing Quality Assurance Non-Conformance Report Form 6009-11 Follow-Up of Non-Conformance and Review of Vendor Rework Records VQAD-7 VQdD-7 Use of " Problems that Require Resolution" Form .
( ,
sio,4n n Pae3 10 e, 10 ESASCo SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 14ANUAL SECTioH INCOR POM ATED QA-I-1 p) g V
{
E SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATI0f4 nevimeN Addendum 1
""" 3#4 #
$ .. . ........ QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Procedure Former No. No. TI.TLE VQAD-8 VQAD-8 Preparation and Control of Vendor Quality Assurance Report Release for Shipment Form No.1305 VQAD-9 VQAD-9 Review and Processing Quality Assurance Reports Form 719-QA-W VQAD-10 VQAD-10 Preparation and Control of Implementing Procedures VQAD-11 VQAD-11 Review of Radiographs by Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives VQAD-12 VQAD-12 kotification of Material Shipped Without Release VQAD-13 VQAD-13 Review of Vendor Documentation VQAD-15 -- Setting up and Maintaining Purchase Order Files in New York Office VQAD-17 -- Interface between Vendor Quality Assurance and Quality Assurance Engineering Departments VQAD-18 -- Interface between Vendor Quality Assurance and Ma-terials . Application Departments VQAD-19 -- Qualification of Inspection, Examination and Testing Personnel for Nuclear Facilities.
- m P
V
e m4n.7s eAn 1 cr 1A esAsco sEnvicE5 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioM 1NCORPoRATED QA-I-2 fs) v { .8.46. . .. 7... ..
2 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES ne s R5 g f r$dh## l DATe fuly 11 14R1 R5
....,%...,7...............y 1.0 SCOPE This section of the Manual describes the organizational structure, functional responsibilities, levels of authority and lines of internal and external communication for management, direction and execution of the Ebasco Quality Program. It is recognized that quality assurance is an interdisciplinary function and not the sole domain of a single quality assurance group; for that reason, this section of the Manual includes organizational and fpnctional descriptions of several departments in addition to that department whose sole function is quality assurance.
2.0 CENERAL 2.1 The Ebasco Operations organization consists of four independent quality ; elated principal divisions headed respectively by the Senior Vice Presidents of Engineering and Construction, Consulting Engineering and Projects and Procurement, and the Vice President Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance. Each of these officers of the company report to
-~s Ebasco's President and Chief Executive Officer through the Executive Vice President Operations. Reporting to the Senior Vice President Engineering
[\s -) and Construction are the Vice President Engineering and Vice President Construction. Reporting to the Senior Vice President Consulting Engineer-ing are the President of Envirosphere Company, the Vice President Plant Operations and Betterment and the Vice President Consulting Engineering.
Reporting to the Senior Vice President Projects and Procurement is the Vice President Procurement.
A fifth quality-related principal division is headed by the Executive Vice President of Advanced Technology and Special Projects who reports directly to Ebasco's President. Reporting to the Executive Vice President Advanced Technology and Special Projects is the Vice President Advanced Technology.
2.2 Representatives of the Senior Vice President Projects and Procurement; of the Vice Presidents Engineering, Construction, Procurement, Plant Operations and Betterment, Consulting Engineering, and Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance; and of the President of Envirosphere Company com-prise the operations organization representatives of the Quality Program Committee, which is responsible for Ebasco Quality Assurance policy. Also included on this Committee is a representative of the Vice President Advanced Technology. This is shown diagramatically-by Figure I-2.1 at the end of this section.
\
)
/
w/
s m e n.n pace 2 ,, 18 HUCLEAR QUALITY A550RANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ESA5CO SERVICE 5 mcomponarco ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 V
2.3 The divisions or departments most directly involved in the implementation of the quality assurance program for design, engineering, fabrication, and installation are Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance, Engineering, Construction, and Procurement. The organiza-tional structures of these are shown on Figure I-2.2, I-2.3, I-2.4 and I-2.5 at the end of this section. The Projects Department provides over-all contractual administration of a project, coordinating the efforts of involved departments and serving as a line of communication between Ebasco and its Clients. The Consulting Engineering, Plant Operations and Betterment, and Advanced Technology Departments are involved in the implementation of Quality Program requirements through the supplementpl services they provide.
The responsibilities of each department of the Ebasco Organization for quality assurance requirements applied to Nuclear Power Stations are described herein.
3.0 MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 3.1 Primary responsibility for Quality Assurance rests with the Vice President R5 Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance who reports directly to the Executive Vice President Operations. Qualification requirements for the p) i position of Vice President Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance are:
V Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering; 10 to 15 years of experience in quality related work or equivalent experience in the engineering or con-struction of a nuclear power plant, including at least 10 years experience in responsible managerial project positions; thorough knowledge of the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program. The Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance Unit is comprised of the following organizations, each of which contributes directly to the implementation of the Quality Program (see Figure I-2.2):
a) Quality Assurance Engineering b) tbterials Application c) Vendor Quality Assurance d) Consulting Quality Assurance Engineer c) Materials Engineering Laboratory 3.1.1 Quality Assurance Engineering is administered by the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer who reports to the Vice President Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance. Qualification requirements for the position of Chief Quality Assurance Engineer are: Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering; 10-15 years of experience in quality-related work or equivalent experience in the engineering or construction of a Nuclear Power Plant, including at least 5 years experience in respon-sible managerial project positions; thorough knowledge of the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program. The Quality Assurance Engineering Depart-ment is responsible to plan implementation of, evaluate, monitor and
e soe4a/s.ts paire 3 cil8. R4 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ESASCO SERVICE 5 mcomponarro ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 enforce the Ebasco Quality Program. This responsibility is carried out by five functional subdivisions:
(a) Project Quality Assurance Engineering (b) Site Quality Assurance / Quality Control R4 (c) Site Quality Program (d) Quality Assurance Specialists which provide various other quality-related services and functions l
(e) Nondestructive Examination (NDE) Quality Assurance Managers, Supervisors and Specialists in charge of the subdivisions
- report directly or through other supervisors to the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer. Engineers and Specialists are then assigned to specific projects f rom these subdivisions. The Quality Assurance Engineering Organization is shown in Figures 1-2.6 and I-2.7.
3.1.1.1 Project Quality Assurance Engineering - A Project Quality Assurance Engineer (PQAE) is assigned to each Nuclear m Project to plan, coordinate and oversee the implementation of I the Quality Assurance Program for that particular project.
d This PQAE, who reports to a Project Quality Assurance Engineer-ing Supervisor, coordinates the Quality Assurance implementa- R4 tion efforts of Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance personnel (quality assurance engineers, materials engineers, welding engineers, nondestructive examination specialists, vendor quality assurance representatives and site quality assurance personnel assigned to his project).
The PQAE has the authority and responsibility to identify quality related problems, to initiate or recommend solutionse to control existing nonconformances until properly dispositioned, and to verify implementation of approved dispositions. Principal tasks performed by the PQAE and those assisting include:
(a) Review Ebasco specifications and drawings for inclusion of quality assurance requirements (b) Evaluate quality assurance programs of suppliers (c) Prepare quality assurance plans for the surveil-lance of activities in suppliers' shops (d) Review or coordinate the review of suppliers' l
nondestructive examination and test procedures R4 (e) Conduct audits of Site Quality Assurance and Vendor Quality Assurance personnel, as applicable.
I I
R -- --
a--,.- -- - , - - - -
7-- , -w. m
e soe4a/a-n pace 4 cr 18 R4 HUC1. EAR QUALITY A550RANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN esAsco senveces swcomponaTzo ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 (f) Direct efforts to obtain ASME Certificates of Authorization for Ebasco as may be required for the particular project (g) Represent Ebasco Quality Assurance Engineering with regard to all project-related activities, such as Owner, Ebasco and/or Vendor Meetings, Owner audits and management audits (h) Distribute and control quality assurance manuals, as well as changes thereto, for the assigned pro-
~
ject 3.1.1.2 Site Quality Assurance - The Manager Site Quality Assurance, who reports to the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer in New York, is responsible for the direction, supervision, and administration of site quality assurance / quality control R4 operations at those nuclear construction sites where a Quality Program Site Manager is not assigned. The Manager Site Quality Assurance is responsible for the development, maint-enance and current status of Site Quality Assurance Engineer-ing Procedures, and for providing technical assistance and Q guidance to subordinate Quality Assurance Engineering Site Supervisors and staff. (See Fig. I-2.2 and Fig. I-2.6). In R4 addition, he is responsible for the review and acceptance of Quality Control procedures.
3.1.1.3 Site Quality Program - A Quality Program Site Manager is assigned to each nuclear project construction site on a l
resident basis for the purpose of overall planning, direction and implementation of the Ebasco Nuc1 car Quality Program Manual.
The Quality Program Site Manager who reports to the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer in New York, is subordinate to no individual on site and has the independent authority to identify site quality related problems, to initiate or recommend solutions, to control existing nonconformances, to verify implementation of approved dispositions, and when necessary, to stop work. He l is responsible to assure that all personnel working for him are qualified for their respective positions pnd properly trained.
The Site Quality Program function is divided into three groups:
Quality Assurance Engineering, Quality Control and Quality l Records, each reporting through a respective supervisor to the Quality Program Site Manager. (See Fig. 1-2.6) R4 l
3.1.1.3.1 Site Quality Assurance Engineering:
A Quality Assurance Site Supervisor and staff of engineers and representatives are assigned the following functions:
s l
\
4 s m42n.n ,4ec 5 o r _R__ R4 HUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN
' ESASCO SERvlCES mcoa noa A T ED ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 (a) Review and audit quality related site construction and engineering activities and records on a continuing basis (b) Audit construction forces for adherence to prescribed approved procedures
]
! (c) Review and/or coordinate review of site suppliers' fabrication and test procedures (d) Review site-generated purchase orders for inclusion of quality assurance requirements i
(c) Review and advise on Quality Control Procedures for compliance with this t Manual and code and regulatory
, requirements. When necessary, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor
! may request the PQAE to assist in the review of these procedures
]
(f) Maintain records of all reviews and audits performed (g) Review all radiographic film for site-related nondestructive examination (h) Audit final records and documentation prior to turn over to the Client 3.1.1.3.2 Site Quality Control - A Quality Control Site Supervisor and staff of engineers e 4
and inspectors are assigned the following functions consistent with the scope of work assigned to Ebasco:
(a) Planning and performance of inspection activities during the construction phase.
(b) Identifying and initiating correction of nonconforming conditions to require-ments indicated by drawings, specifica- ,
tions, codes or procedures and perform- R4 ance of reinspection to verify corrective ,
action taken a
sioecan.n paos 6 or _18_ , R4 HUCLEAR QUALITY A5$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION I ESASCO SERVICES ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 (c) Establishing and enforcing quality control documentation and inspection ,
requirements based upon specifications, codes, standards, and drawings as established by Engineering i
(d) Performance or monitoring of site NDE, soils and concrete testing activities (e) Assisting in organizing and administering i
training seminars as required to assure j proper level of training and engagind in the certification of Quality Control personnel to the required level of i qualification (f) Identification and control of the quality status of items I (g) Development and implementation of '
applicable Quality Control Plans, and generation of inspection reports l O' covering mandatory inspection activities at the construction site The Site Quality Control Group will only be responsibic for first-level Quality Control 1 activities for safety-related items and services being performed by Ebasco's forces. For work being performed by Contractors, the Contractors
! will be responsible for first 1evel Quality Control activities.
3.1.1.3.3 Site Quality Records - A Quality Records Supervisor and staf f of specialists are assigned the following functions:
(a) Develop, establish and implement a system for the collection, storage and maintenance of Quality Assurance Records at the project construction site
] (b) Responsible for review for completeness,
- control, storage, preservation and safekeeping of vendor / contractor and site generated quality assurance records b
(
)
e s o,4 a n.n paor 7 or ll R4 HUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION O EBA5CO 5tRVICES ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 (c) Establishment and implementation of a records indexing system to permit proper traceability and retrieval (d) Establishment of a procedure for access to the records storage area, and removal and retrieval of quality records 3.1.1.4 Quality Assurance Specialists - Quality Assurance Engineering has several specialty groups responsible for the following activities which are performed in accordance with QA procedures:
(a) Performance of Inservice Inspection R4 (b) Qualification and certification of personnel as required by applicable codes or standards (c) Development of Quality Assurance standards p and procedures b) (d) Review, evaluation and summarization of Code and Regulatory Quality Assurance Requirements (e) Evaluation of suppliers' Quality Assurance Program (f) Conducting Quality Assurance education, both internal and external to Quality Assurance R4 Engineering (g) Interdepartmental auditing of all individuals R4 or groups responsible for activities covered by the Quality Program (h) Development of Quality Assurance Records Programs R4 (1) Development of Quality Assurance Programs '
for Power Plant Operations 3.1.1.5 Nondestructive Examination Quality Assurance:
This group, under the Assistant Chief Quality Assurance Engineer in charge of Inservice Inspection and Nondestructive Examination R4 provides expertise with regard to conducting various forms of NDE and includes the following functions:
O
sioeca/a.7s pacre 8 o,. MM NUCLEAR QUALITY A550RANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SEcrion ESASCO SERVICES i ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 i
(a) Establish and/or interpret NDE require-i ments and acceptance criteria for fabricated and erected equipment as required (b) Review and comment on NDE procedures and radiographic films submitted by manufac-turers, site construction forces and/or clients (c) Advise manufacturer and site construction forces as to proper NDE procedures, Appli-cations, techniques, equipment and qualifications 3.1.1.6 Radiation Safety - Ebasco's Corporate Radiation '
Safety Officer reports to the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer lie is responsibic for auditing and enforcing the Ebasco pro- R4 1
cedures for radiation safety.
3.1.2 Materials Applications, under the supervision of the Chief A Materials Engineer, includes two subdivisions: Materials Engineering and Welding Engineering. A Project Materials Engineer and Project Welding Engineer are assigned to each project. These positions may R4 be assigned to the same individual if properly qualified. Quality- R4 related activities of Materials Applications personnel include the following:
(a) Develop material and welding specifications
! (b) Develop and qualify welding procedures and fabrication '
techniques for use by Ebasco site construction forces, '
engineered equipment supp1fers and erectors.
(c) Advise Ebasco Construction Management as to the develop- l ment and application of advanced welding techniques ,
which would enhance quality. ,
(d) Review Ebasco specifications and drawings for compliance ,
with applicabic codes and regulatory requirements for R4 proper selection of materials, weld procedures and joint details ,
(c) Review suppliers' material specification and f abrication ,
procedures for compliance with project specifications ,
and codes ,
- b. (f) Assist in welder performance testing to assure that all V code and regulatory requirements have been met. l (g) Participate in quality assurance evaluations of suppliers in the arca of welding, materials and fabrication
sm42nos pus 9 g,18 NUCLEAR QUAUTY A550RANCE PROGRAM MANUAL secytow C
QA-I-2
,\
f Yeon,3'Ngo"3 on ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES (h) Provide technical assistance as required to resolve problems in suppliers' shops and at the construction site in the areas of welding, materials, heat treat-ment atA other related areas.
(i) Provide technical assistance concerning material prop-erties under service conditions involving stress,
' radiation, temperature, corrosive media, etc., to determine capability of specific materials to perform in such environments.
3.1.3 Vendor Quality Assurance is administered by the Chief Vendor Quality Assurance Representative who reports to the Vice President Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance. The primary function of this department is to establish and maintain confidence that i purchase order and documented Quality Assurance Program requirements are complied with during fabrication in Suppliers' shops and in those of their subsuppliers, and to document results of shop surveillance .
i visits made to carry out this function. Specific details of this l
department's responsibilities are included in Section QA-II-5 of
{,
this Manual.
s, 3.1.4 The Consulting Quality Assurance Engineer reports to the Vice President Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance. He is responsible for conducting audits of the Ebasco Quality Assurance function to determine and report its compliance with the Ebasco Quality Program requirements.
3.1.5 The Materials Engineering Laboratory performs field non-destructive examination, and soils, concrete and reinforcing steel testing services at construction sites, as applicable. The Laboratory is administered by a Manager who reports to the Vice President Materials Engineering and Quality Assurance.
4.0 ENGINEERING Primary responsibility for design and engineering rests with the Vice-President of Engineering (see Figure I-2.3).
4.1 Chief Engineers of the various engineering desciplines report R5 directly to 'the Vice-President of Engineering, and are responsible R5 for technical and administrative aspects of the engineering and design phases of their disciplines.
4.2 A Project Engineer is assigned to each Nuclear Project. Project Engineers lead and coordinate the various technical functions performed es in connection with their projects and assure that the requirements of Section QA-I-4 of this Manual relating to Engineering are implemented.
( )
enor 10 ,, 18 s too4an-n DR) CLEAR GJALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MAf4AAL scCTioM
[\ ERASCO SEPVICES
'"C " " " * " QA-I-2 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES 4.3 A Lead Discipline Engineer from each engineering discipline is respon- '
sible for project come tments to the Project Engineer and is technically responsible to a Supervising Engineer, who reports to an Assistant Chief R5 Engineer or to a Director, who in tu.m reports to a discipline Chief Engineer.
One Lead Discipline Engineer from each engineering discipline is continuously assigned to each nuclear project. Additional engineers are assigned to assist
the Lead Discipline Engineer, as needed.
- 4.4 Design Supervisors report to a Group Supervisor or Supervising Design R5 Engineer who reports to a Division Chief, who reports to the Chief Engineer.
Design Supervisors supervise the work of draftsmen and designers in the preparations of drawings.
TheEbdineeringDepartmentisresponsibleforperformanceofthefol-4.5 lowing activities in accordance with approved written instructions and/or procedures:
(a) Preparing equipment specifications and drawings as well as revisions thereto in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-I-4 of this Manual (b) Providing stress analyses of piping systems
,(c) Reviewing bids to determine whether specifications are met technically (d) Evaluating Bidders' and Suppliers' deviations and/or proposed alternatives (e) Reviewing Suppliers' drawings or other Suppliers' design criteria in accordance with specification requirements.
4.6 Primary responsibility for stress analysis of piping systems rests with the Vice-president of Engineering as administered by the Chief Engineer Mechanical 4.6.1 Engineers in the Stress Analysis Department report to the Assistant Chief Engineer, Applied Mechanics, who in turn reports to the R5 R5 Chief Mechanical Engineer.
4.6.2 The Stress Analysis Department is responsible for the calcu- <
lation of stresses in piping systems to assure full compliance with I applicable codes and to assure full compliance with regulatory re-quirements as contained in licensing documentation and applicable NRC Rules and Regulation'
. ,os 4 an.n Pact 11 or 18 g4 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN ex ESA5Co SERV 0CES ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2
[ lNCoHPoRATcD b
4.7 Primary responsibility for engineering standards and procedures rests with the Vice-P. resident of Engineering. The Standards and Procedures Department is responsible for administrative control of Ebasco's Standard Specifications (i.e. , materials specifications, engineering specifications),
Design Guides, and Engineering Department Guides.
4.7.1 Engineers in the Standards and Procedures Department report to the Manager - Standards and Procedures who in turn reports to the Vice-President of Engineering 4.7.2 Engineers performing the specific functions in this department are responsibic for coordinating the technical input from the te-sponsible engineering disciplines.
4.7.3 The Standards and Procedures Department is responsible for obtaining and documenting approvals for the initial issues and all subrequent revised issues of the Ebasco Standard Specifications.
Administrative control of the specifications is maintained by this department with an up-to-date index (reissued once every three months) listing the latest issue of each specification.
'~'g 4.7.4 Administrative control of Ebasco Engineering and Design Guides R4 g ) is performed in the Standards and Procedures Department. Technical input is performed by the responsible engineering disciplines, while the issuance and control of distribution of the Design Guides and Engineering department Guides are performed in the Standards and Procedures Department. Administrative control is maintained by means of an up-to-date index for each numbered Manual which dates each guide on the index as revisions are issued. Records are maintained to sub-stantiate internal review and approval required for each document.
4.7.5 The Standards and Procedures Department is responsible for the coordination of preparation and control of departmental imple-menting procedures.
5.0 CONSTRUCTION I
Primary responsibility for construction rests with the Vice-President of Con-struction (see Figure I-2.4). The Construction Department has the prime re-sponsibility for the performance of quality construction.
g 5.1 Construction Managers report to the Vice-President of Construction l, and are responsible for overall supervision and coordination of all con-struction activities and services.
5.2 The Manager of Construction Services reports to the Vice-President i of Construction and is responsible for general supervision of Construction
![ Department Quality Program activities and of the Construction Engineering t
Q} Group.
l l
l l
t
l l
12 18 R4 '
4109 4A/2 75 PAGE cF. _
HUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTlON EBASCO SERVICE 5 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 v
)
5.2.1 The Manager of Quality Control, reporting to the Manager of Construction Services, is responsible for development of Quality Control Standard Procedures and Construction Department Standard Procedures, coordination and direction of training and qualification of personnel, keeping abreast of NRC and all Code requirements and periodic reporting to Construction Department Management of current
~
Quality Program status and any required corrective actions.
5.2.2 The Manager of Construction Engineering reports to the Manager of Construction Services and is re.sponsible for the inclusion of quality requirements in Construction Contracts and review of Engineered Documents as required by the Quality Assurance Program Manual.,
(All construction contracts involving safety-related equipment are subj ect to review by the Quality Assurance Engineering Department for compliance with the applicable code and regulatory agency require-ments and Quality Assurance Program requirements).
5.3 For individual projects, the Site Manager reports to a Construction
! Manager and has the responsibility for direction and coordination of all on-site activities associated with the construction of the plant.
5.4 The Project Superintendent reports to the Site Manager and is re-sponsible for performing general site supervision of construction in ac-
[(_,)/ cordance with drawings, specifications and contractual obligations.
5.5 The Construction Superintendent reports to the Project Superintendent and has the responsibility of assuring that jobsite fabrication and in-stallation is in accordance with drawings, specifications and other pre-valling documents.
5.6 Area Superintendents report to the Project Superintendent and are responsible for area planning and scheduling, area construction control and is responsible for all phases of field office and field engineering.
5.7 The Senior Resident Engineer reports to the Project Superintendent and is responsible for all phases of field office and field engineering.
5.8 The Administration Manager reports to the Site Manager, and is re-sponsible for management of site office services, including purchasing, materials administration, data processing and accounting.
5.9 The Purchasing Administrator reports to the Administration Manager and is responsible for the issuance and control of purchasing documents between vendors and personnel at the jobsite.
5.10 The Material Adminstrator reports to the Administration Manager and is responsible for commerical receiving inspection, storage and issue of materials at the site.
\
N~ s'/
s t oo4a/a.75 paos 13 er 18 M NUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL 5ECTION E8ASCO SERVICES
/ mconson AT eo ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 6.0 ENVIROSPHERE COMPANY ,
Primary responsibility for nuclear licensing and environmental matters rests ,
with the President and Chief Executive Officer of Envirosphere Company. ,
6.1 Nuclear Licensing - Nuclear Licensing is administered by the ,
Manager Nuclear Licensing who reports to the Vice President Envirosphere, ,
who in turn reports to the President of Envirosphere. Each nuclear ,
project is assigned a Project Licensing Engineer who reports to the ,
Manager Nuclear Licensing through a Nuclear Licensing Supervisor. Nuclear ,
Licensing is responsible for performing the following in accordance with ,
approved written instructions and/or procedures: ,
a) Establishing the guidelines for the identification and ,
classification of structures, systems and equipment ,
important to safety b) Preparation of safety design bases and criteria for ,
structures, systems and equipment important to safety ,
c) Overall coordination and review of preparation of ,
safety analysis reports, amendments and other licensing ,
documents as well as control of distribution thereof R4 d) Advising engineering as to.the acceptability of imple- ,
mentation of design bases and criteria as contained ,
in drawings and specifications ,
e e) Review and interpretation of regulatory agency requirements ,
and advising Engineering of same ,
f) Establish and maintain records of the generation and ,
approval of licensing documents including revisions ,
thereto 6.2 Nuclear Safety Review - Nuclear safety review is administered by ,
the Manager Nuclear Licensing, who reports to the Vice President ,
Enviroephere, who in turn reports to the President of Envirosphere. .
Each nuclear project is assigned a Project Licensing Engineer who is ,
responsible for implementation of safety review activities. He directs ,
the activities of the licensing engineers assigned to the project in ,
performing safety review. Nuclear licensing is responsible for perform- ,
ing the following safety review activities in accordance with approved ,
written instructions and or procedures. ,
a) Safety review of selected drawings and specifications (see ,
Section QA-I-4) to assure compliance with NRC Regulations, ,
SAR and the intent of applicable Regulatory Guides. ,
O b) Interpreting safety' design bases and criteria for structures, ,
( systems and components important to nuclear safety ,
c) Establishing and maintaining records substantiating (a) and ,
(b) above.
s'os e n*75 PArt 14,_ CF 18 .R4 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ESASCO SERVICE 5 incon*on AT eo ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2
.V 9
6.3 For environmental matters, the responsible Envirosphere Vice Presidents report to the President of Envirosphere Company, who in R4 turn reports to the Senior Vice President Consulting Engineering. '
They are responsible for providing Environmental Consultation : services of their respective departments as the need arises.
7.0 CONSULTING ENGINEERING Primary responsibility for consulting engineering rests with the Vice-President R4 Consulting Engineering. For environmental matters, primary responsibility rests R4 with the President of Envirosphere Company. R4 7.1 Chief Consulting Engineers of the various engineering disciplines R4 report direct.ly to the Vice-President Consulting Engineering and are responsible for consultation provided by their respective disciplines 7.2 Consulting Engineers, who report to the Chief Consulting Engineers of R4 their respective disciplines are assigned to nuclear projects to provide consulting services as the need arises.
7.3 The Consulting Engineering Department works with the Engineering
[/)
\._ Department in the development of new concepts relating to engineering and design criteria, equipment specifications, plant cycles and equipment R4 arrangements and assists the Engineering Department in the resolution of special problems. Such activities are to be performed in accordance with Section QA-I-4 of the Manual.
8.0 PROJECTS R4 Primary responsibility for project administration rests with the Senior Vice-President Projects and Procurement:
8.1 Managers of Projects report to the Senior Vice President Projects and R4 Procurement and are responsible for overall supervision of the various projects.
8.2 Each nuclear project is assigned a Project Manager who reports to a4 a R1 nager of Projects. A " project team" consisting of a Project Engineer, Project Superintendent and other assigned engineers and representatives from each discipline as appropriate is assembled for each project. The overall coordination of the activities of this team is the responsibility of the Project Manager.
R4 8.3 The Project Manager maintains close liaison with the Project QA Engineerins. tn order to assure that contractual quality assurance require-r~s ments are satisfied.
( )
'V
pace 15 or 18 om4an-n ._.
NUCLEAR QUALITY A55URAriCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION E 5C 5E CE5 QA-1-2 p e9 po ]jgo ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES 8.4 The Project Manager is the prime point of contact between Ebasco and the Client. However, the project Quality Assurance Engineer has the right of establishing independent lines of communication regarding quality assurance with the client and suppliers, while keeping the Project Manager ( and Purchasing, in the casa of suppliers) apprised of any such R5 contacts.
8.5 The Project Manager is responsible for establishing, at the earliest possible point, the Project Distribution Schedule. This is a complete listing of the various forms of communication such as letters, purchase orders and reports, as well as all of the various organizations, 'Jogh
- internal and external to Ebasco. The Project Distribution Schedule is a matrix which provides a uniform distribution system for the overall project in order to assure an orderly, consistent flow of communication.
A sample of the Project Distribution Schedule is provided at the end of this section as Figure 1-2.8.
9.0 PLANT OPERATIONS AND BETTERMENT Primary responsibility for operational engineering for equipment systems and total plant rests with the Vice-President Plant Operations and Betterment.
T l 9.1 The Chief Engineer of Operations Engineering, the Manager of
Reliability Engineering, and the Director of Engineering and Construction Retrofit Services report directly to the Vice-President-Plant Operations and Betterment and are responsible for technical and administrative aspects of the respective groups.
9.2 Lead Engineers from each group, who report to their Director or an intermediate Supervisor, are assigned to nuclear projects as required.
9.3 Operations Engineering Group provides engineers for consulting and advising on starting and testing of nuclear power plants, writing pre-operational test procedures, review of plant design and resolving equipment and system operating problems.
10.0 PURCilASING AND TRAFFIC Primary responsibility for purchasing and traffic by the Ebasco Engineering Of fice rests with the Vice-President of Procurement.
10.1 Project Procurement Supervisors report to the Director of Purchasing through the Purchasing Agents and the Manager of Project Purchasing.
~
The Director of Purchasing is responsible to the Vice President of Procure-ment. Contract Administrators and Buyers, who report to the Project Procurement Supervisors, are responsible for the phases of purchasing to which they are assigned.
~ _ -
- -, - - - ,n , ,
paar 16 or 18 R4 esosea/a 7s NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBA$CO SERVICES $-I-2
,O. mcos, eon ATEo ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES R4 10.2 The Purchasing Department is responsible for the following:
10.2.1 Obtaining prequalification quality assurance information R4 from prospective Bidders.
10.2. ! Transmitting technical and quality assurance requirements R4 to qualifled prospective Eidders by inquiry.
The Manager of Traf fic and Freight Forwarding reports to the Vice- R4 10.3
' President of Procurement and is responsible for the overall transportation activities, project related, and purchased equipment from vendors' plants to jobsite as required under contract provisions. ,
11.0 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 9 Primary respons,1bility for Advanced Technology rests with the Vice President 3 Advanced Technology.
R4 11.1 Chemical Engineering Group - The Chemical Engineering Group is '
administered by the Chief Engineer - Chemical Engineering who reports '
to the Vice-President Advanced Technology. The Chemical Engineering '
Group has the prime responsibility for Radwaste design engineering on '
all nuclear and fossil plants.
>v) (a) Engineers performing Radwaste services are technically responsible to Radwast.< Supervisors. These. Supervisors '
report to the Chief Engineer-Chemical Engineering, (b) Lead Discipline Radwaste Engineers are assigned to each nuclear project. Additional Engineers are assigned to assist the Lead Discipline Engineer as required (c) The Chemical Engineering Group is responsible for performance of the following in accordance with approved instructions and/or procedures:
R4 (1) Preparing Radwaste process system designs, piping and instrumentation flow diat, rams, applicable safety analysis reports and environmental reports sections, general arrangements, equipment and systems specifications in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-I-4 of this Manual (2) Reviewing vendor proposals to determine whether they meet technical requirements of the specifications (3) Evaluating bidder's deviations and/or proposed alter-natives
\
v
)
(4) Reviewing supplier's drawings or other design criteria in accordance with specification requirements l
l
sioe 4 4/a.7s pass 17 er M NUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN E8ASCO SERYlCE5 sucowonaTeo ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 v
(5) Establishing and maintaining records substantiating (1), (2), (3), and (4) above 11.2 Applied Physica - Applied Physics is administered by the Chief '
Engineer-Applied Physics who reports to the Vice-President . Advanced
- Technology. The Applied Physics Section has the prime responsibility R4 for containment analysis, shielding physics and radiation criteria for '
design.
(a) Engineers in the Applied Physics Section report to the Super-vising Engineers, who in turn report to the Chief Engineer- R4 Applied Physics. R4 9
(b) Applied Physics is responsible for performance of the following in accordance with written approved instructions and/or pro-cedures:
(1) Developing design criteria for reactor containment pressure and temperature transient analysis (2) Developing shielding design criteria (3) Developing radiation effects analysis and radiation
> monitoring criteria; preparing purchase specifications V and evaluating bids for radiation monitoring equipment (4) Providing support services to other departments by analyzing and developing modes for special problems, such as jet forces and pipe whip (5) Establishing and maintaining records substantiating (1),
(2), (3), and (4) above.
11.3 Nuclear Engineering - Nuclear Engineering is administered by the Chief Engineer - Nuclear Engineering who reports to the Vice President R4 Advanced Technology. The Nuclear Engineering Department has the prime responsibility for r.ngineering and management services for the nuclear fuel cycle, and for nuclear plant engineering analyses associated with fuel handling, storage, and reactor in-core operation.
(a) Engineers in the Nuclear Engineering Section report to the Supervising Engineer, who reports to the Assistant Chief Engineer R4 Nuclear Engineering, who in turn reports to the Chief Engineer- '
Nuclear Engineering.
(b) The Nuclear Engineering Section is responsible for performance of the following:
p (1) Determining spent fuel fission product decay heat release rates for spent fuel pool cooling system sizing, spent V)
(
fuel storage rack design, and pool heat-up calculations (2) Developing spent fuel storage rack design criteria; preparing purchase specifications and evaluating bids for spent fuel racks
s io.4af a.ss paag_ M or 18 R4 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION i' ESASCO SERYlCE5 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES QA-I-2 (3) Providing support services to other departments on spent fuel rack interfacing systems, such as spent fuel handling machine requirements (4) Preparing and reviewing sections of_ Safety Analysis Reports pertaining to spent fuel storage racks and interfacing systems (5) Developing nuclear criticality analyses (6) Obtaining nuclear fuel meeting specified operational and performance requirements for clients '
(7) Establishing and maintaining records substantiating 1 through 6 above 11.4 Plant S'ecurity - Plant Security is administered by the Chief Engineer R4 Nuclear Engineering, who reports to the Vice President Advanced Technology. R4 Plant Security has the prime responsibility for engineering design consider-ations and criteria associated with the design and installation of a plant security system.
l (a) Engineers in Plant Security report to the Manager of Plant Security who in turn reports to the Chief Nuclear Engineer. R4 (b) Plant Security is responsible for performance of the following:
(1) Minimizing the vunerability of the plant to radiological sabotage that may result in a hazard to the public.
(The Code of Federal Regulations postulates that the act
,of sabotage may be initiated by an insider or a group of outsiders or a combination of both.)
(2) Developing plant arrangements and layouts such that access to redundant safety related components are precluded during normal operation, such as the use of structural walls and doors.
(3) Providing access during emergency conditions, such as fire (4) Providing and complying with criteria for all security vital equipment that is required to isolate the public from a radiological release, or that is required to l
mitigate the results of radiological sabotage l ,
O 11.5 Dynamics and Systems - Dynamics and Systems Engineering is adminis-V tered by the Director - Dynamics and Systems who reports to the Vice President Advanced Technology. Dynamics and Systems Engineering provides continuing analysis of any aspect of operational engineering and deemed economically h,
valid and attainable. ,
Ebasco Services incorportted OPERATIONS AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION SHOWING QUALITY PROGRAM COMMITTEE REPRESENTATION PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE ADVANCEO VICE PREsa0ENT TECMe0 LOGY &
OPERATIONS WEC1AL PROJECT 5 R4 V" I O'NT y,c,"PRyDENT VICE PRE DENT g EMNEERtW MMMS ENGINEERHeG AND CONSTRUCTBoM PROCU esENT ICE R4 M DENT VICE PRE $sDENT VeCE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT V6CE PRESDIENT tea R PREllDE NT ADVANCED CONSULT (NG ENGINEERING &
EXVIROSPHE RE M RAT M Af0D PROCURElsENT TECH 9eOLOGY ENGINE E RING CONSTRUCT 90sd ENGINEERepeG oUALITY COMPANY SE ERuf 9ff A$$~JRANCE w
e oP oP oP o, or oP
=E oP oP Comu Comu Comu Cosas Conau Comu Comu Comu
.R Comu REP REP REP REP REP REP REP REP mEP R4 6
\ Ebasco L-. ices ine:rporated s MATERIALS ENGINEERING & QUALITY ASSURANCE ORGANIZATION EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OPERATIONS VICE PRES 10ENT MATERIALS ENGlWEER146 &
QUALITT ASSURANCE OgsEF VENDOR CONSULT NG CHIEF CHIEF QUALITY QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE MATE RI ALS ASSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE ENG1NE E R ENGINE E R ENGINE ER taANAGER PROJECT QUALITY OUALITY SaATE RIALS ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUPERVISORS ENGaNEERiesG ENGINEERING SITE MAhAGERg LARORATORY SUPERVISORS PROJECT QUALITY SITE VENDOR ASSURANCE QUALITY OUALITY MATERIALS E*KilNEERS AND PROGRAM ASSURANCE ENGINEERS STAFF STAFF REPRESENTATIVES OUALITY haANAGER UWELDING ASSURADICE SITE ENGINEERS EteGINE E RING OUALITY SPECIALISTS ASSURANCE ASSISTANT CHIEF QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE SUPERVISORS ,
ENGINEER ANO INSERVICE INSPECTION STAFFS NDE h
Ec SUPE RviSORS SE AND
- STAFFS u
li' il i
V lil lill llal I
i
!Il l11 11
- e. .,,
p lli il -
i 4
3G l
g t.l I
og i
_188 l .j' I g ,
- l 1
l 1 i l
l 1 1 1 I l I
l ,;1 1
1 I
I I
l I
lil, I' l l l -
1 il ,1 8
"l _ _ ,. _ _
)g ! --
l i
il 11 i i
l i
I i' l O l 5 i U !llI ll lllI 1l l ,
l T, !,l T, il i
l_______ ___1_____________________J ,,
S E
R V
$O UIT YDS T A w IRIV T N
R S
E S V S L R L T YM RE TA YOS O O A T RI T IL REG ILTV T N GTA ANR AOSN U UOE QR P A M QCP U E
R S P E
R S
E S E V
E R C T O A S A T
'AEI N RTV $R 1 E S
E E P R U P DG S E R
EN i TIR AE S R E S /V E
ON R E
C VCO TNS ER ESI T CR NE A P I E
A L AIV AET RNN AR R RG NSAR A
I U UU OSPSE UI E
$GS
$N E ON S AERP M
NE E YCR USE N I
FT NE C EI AE I 1l l l l i l I l l li i iI Il IIl II I g l3IIiJ HALR N I
I CUSUGN -
CR I
A QS A E u
a m
VU - S _
RS -
N O E L
I ES N A-I LGM YMT YC T G RIOM ANA TAA N SA -
I IN T I OTA DA R NUG NI RTRG ED IO IRR T L
AG S A R A
U E
D-R OY - UOI I
D LO T UR $
U E VAR N ORN $ F IAP Ps )O-CT - A VP E
M D
A A S SIL - T-IS L
AA - A I
C-BU -
E EQ - E F
EN N YTOS N P-S.
A I
VO E RNf t
H CEE S
TIT I
CO II OEA DM S
0-
{
- DC N' C A VTC TMR AET RE T
I NNV I
l OUN R E LRS T
S R-A NRMI EP
- A1R T$
/
I RS Y H C
StE S EX N(
IN QtM 3
OE E
RER D G-N
- A I A
- D-E E
= "
- =
=
"" C C-
- S U-E
- E ..
rI i:I l6It I ilIl I l , llII ii Il I il l l lI,L GS ) ES NRTyC E
YCER E CR E
iECTN t
lEEI A 9NAN E E VhJL RI RN Re OAR I
E GRUU UG UG S
$ $N SN w PNFO UE
$ SE A AE S A
\
mW h.@
xC #
~ I
\ \ N EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED OUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEERING QUALITY ASSURANCE SPECIALISTS CHIE F OUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEER
-e I I E AUDITING R$3/NDE SUPERVISOR SE RVICE S
- 1 I
I I I NON- VENDOR IN TE RN AL IN SE RVICE DE STRUCTIVE EVALUATION AUDITING INSPE CTION EX AMIN ATION PROGRAM PROGRAM
, $UPE RVISOR SUPE RVISOR GROUP LEADER GROUP LE ADE R I I l_ l PRE-I IN-I I NDE I I I I I I I NDE NDE AEO l* O CE MTE OFF CE AN LY$13 g' EX AN CI A STS CIA STS ggg INATION INATION CE RT. NY $3TE
- 1 I I I OUALITY QUALITY OPERATIONAL ASSURANCE REGULATORY ASSURANCE QUALITY RECORDS RE QUIRE ME NTS PROGRAM ASSURANCE M AGEMENT ADMINISTR ATION ADMINISTRATION MANAGER I
, ,, I I I I I I fD P OUALITY OPERATIONAL fNg ASSURANCE RECORDS NRC ASME CODE ASME N ST AMPS IEEE ANSI STD's PROCEDURES AND TRAINING, AND CRIAllif A$$URANCE MANAGEMENT STANDARD $ OUALIFICATIONS E NGINE E RN yg REPRESENTATIVES ,
y $PE CI ALISTS
)
PAGE I CF 4 sios4n-7s ESA5CO SERYlCES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMMANUAL SECTioM i INCORPORATEo . QA-I-2 i SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATI0f4 nevision Addendum 1 o^75 3/4/R2
, ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
- 1. Paragraph 2.3:
- a. Fourth line: Delete " Engineering"
- b. Fir'st sentence, second line: Delete " design, engineering,"
I c Third sentence: Change to read from "The Project Department..." to "The Construction Department..."
- d. Fifth line: Delete reference to Figure I-2.3.
- 2. Paragraph 3.1.1.1:
- a. Delete the paragraph in its entirety.
- b. Add the above deleted subparagraphs (b) through (h) as part of para-graph 3.1.1.3.
- 3. Paragraph 3.1.1.3.1:
- a. Add a subparagraph (i) to read as follows:
v (i) The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor has stop work authority.
- 4. Paragraph 3.1.1.3.2:
- a. Add a subparagraph (h) to read as follows:
(h) The Quality Control Site Supervisor has stop work authority.
- 5. Paragraph 4.0, 6.0, 7.0,-8'0, 9.0:and'11.0: Delete in its entirety.
- 6. Paragraph 5.4:
- a. Add the following sentence: The Project Superintendent has stop work authori ty.
- 7. Paragraph 5.7: ,,
.a. Add the following sentence: The Senior Resident Engineer has stop work authori ty. .
O O
~
O I
m
Pact 2 or 4 sio,.sn.7 s EBASCO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioH INCORPORATED .
QA-I-2 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT j ELECTRIC GEllERATIflG STATI0tl Revision Addendum 1
^'" 3/4/R9
% ........uny...
b ..c......... ORGAtlIZATI0tl AfID RESP 0tlSIBILITIES
- 8. Figure 1-2.3: Delete
- 9. Figure I-2.4:
- a. Delete Figure *-2.4 Rev. 4.
- b. Use Figure I-2.4 revised for South Texas Project. (Copy Attached) l
- 10. Figure I-2.8: Delete
- 11. Figure I-2.9: Add Figure I-2.9 Revision 0 which indicates the interface be-tween HL&P and BPC. .(Copy Attached) 9
'O :,
i . _ _ - .. . ... _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
e m4n-75 PAGE 3 or 4 EBASCO SERVICE 5 HUCLEAR" QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION iNeonPonarco QA-I-2 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT -
Q { ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION Revision Addendum 1
"^ 4#
Y[........... ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES Ebasco. Services incorporated ORGANIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR 50VIH TEXA5 PROJECT VICE PRESIDENT OF CONSTRUCTION I
__ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ t _ _ _ q l MANAGER OF CONSTRUCTION l CON $1RUCTION M NAGER I SERVICES 1
I I i- 1 I MAN AGER OF MANAGER OF CONSTRUCTION
- QUALITY
(\j) l ENGINE ERING CONTROL
_ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ ' 2o"'E -
StTE MANAGER I
ADMINIST R ATION PROJECT -
'~
MANAGER SUPE RINT ENDEN T 1 I MATE RI AL AREA CONSTRUCTION $ENtOR REslOENT
~
ADMINIS T RATO R $UPE RINT E NDE N TS SUPE RIN T ENDEN T E NG6NE E R I
CHASNG $UPE RINT E ND E N TS I
'HAS 510P WOR K AU THORIT Y
- CONT R ACTOe45 O
m
~
CONSTRUCTION l FORCE $ FIGURE l 2 4 l -- . _ . . _ _
(
a INTERFACE BETWEE' m ) (m
( HOUSTONLIGHTINGAND(,jl, LECHTEL POWER CORP., AND EBASCO SERVICES, INC.
( ,
. APPROVAL j
- . . A 5 D k
F CJECT CA SITC f i as N em A;ER ----------
eAnAcER :c ci 0m t
- 3O HOUSTON LIGHTING & F0WER 3;
3g BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION ; n-
+
CORPORATE QA a
oQ **
i . DESIGN ;
MANAGER OF ENGif.EERING j CCNSTRUCTION "
PROJECT CA - - - - - - - - - -
, MANA;ER CEFult !WiAGER
' 0F CONSTRUCTION
- Z C
I o n i x r-O m
~
FIELD D
^
m M
ENGINEERING .-,
BECHTEL PpWER CCRR $
q Om
,o o y O
, CHIEF QA VICE PRESIDENT EBASCO SERVICES lhC. ~
e
^
MS z y C
ENGI!.EER CONSTRUCTION , O
> m -4 5 50
- o w c x km m -4 QUALITY PROGRAM SITE MANAGER
- _ - _ _ _ . CONSTRUCTION MGR.
SITE MANAGER o
E$
ooL rn n 2 o U NN e
t-a . 8"Q e-.
CUALITY ASSUR. CUALITY CONTROL DROJECT y 9
~~
s SITE SUPERVISOR SITE SUPERVISOR SUPERINTENDENT --
\ 2 c c
lc
- f*
5 r Q'JALITY RECCFCS CCNSTRUCTION SENIOR RESIDENT o 3 m SUPERVISCR SU?ERINTENCENTS ENGINEER > m m m
i H
" 5 n 1
- e d g C O o g b
a- a .
O q
v a y 5 *
- 4 s . --
I OF sios4/2 75 PAGE 3
, EBA$CO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
[m}
's_ / ,
incomponATE g er PERSONNEL INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING OA-I-3
- 776p/ M PROGRAM IN QUALITY ASSURANCE navision 2 DATE b/11/77
. ..... n ,. .. ,,............
1.0 SCOPE AND PURPOSE 1.1 This section of the manual describes the program for indoctrination and training of Ebasco personnel engaged in activities subject to the quality assurance requirements of the Ebasco Quality Program to provide assurance of their proper understanding and proper implementation of Quality Assurance requirements.
1.2 Indoctrination and Training in Quality Assurance can be either .
corporate , department , or project-level, with presentations or material R2 decigned to meet the needs of the particular level to which '
addressed.
~
1.3 A specific listing of presentations, or units.of instruction, to which this section applies will be maintained by the Manpower ,'
Planning and Development and Quality Assurance Engineering Depart- R2 ments for all corporate quality assurance training. Such a listing '
8
[} can be used as a source of reference as to what quality assurance
~
( ,/,
training is available.
4 2.0 CENERAL 2.1 Units of Instruction shall comprise the substance of the training program. Each unit will consist of a self-contained course of instruction dealing with one or more quality related topics, complete R2 in itself, to achieve one or more stated educational objectives. R2 2.2 The program includes units of instruction in the following areas:
a) General Information b) Quality Assurance Engineering c) Site Quality Assurance d) Construction Quality Control e) Nondestructive Examination f) Vendor Quality Assurance g) Design and Engineering h) Purchasing i) Nuclear Licensing R2 i ;
'v/
sios4A/a n pace 2 or 3 NUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN
) E A5Co CES copp 5E V)go PERSONNEL INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM IN QUALITY ASSURANCE QA-I-3 3.0 PREPARATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF UNITS OF INST 1tUCTION ,
3 1 All units of instruction presented under this program shall be preplanned and have a documented outline. The units of instruction, ,
and revisions thereto, shall be reviewed by the Quality Assurance i Engineering Department to assure that the program conforms with the R2 requirements of the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, appli- l cable codes, and regulatory agencies. Copics of the documented outline i shall be kept on file in the Manpower Planning and Development Department.
3.2 Information in the documented outline shall include, as applicable, the following: _.
a) name of unit b) objectives c) time duration ..
d) program designer .
e) subject matter expert 7
'R2 f) training population g) subject content h) instructor's guidelines
- 1) handouts, visual aids, etc.
j) method of validation 4.0 RECORDS ,
4.1 The following records of quality assurance indoctrination and training l program presentations shall be maintained by the Manpower Planning and ,
Development Department and the Ouality Assurance Engineering Department ,
9 a) General Chronological Log of presentations which includes date of presentation, identification /name of presentation and department, ,
f b) Subsidiary Chronological Logs of presentations for each unit of ,R2 instruction, which include names of participants, date, time duration and location, ,'
i 4.2 Individual Training Files for each person receiving Quality Assurance ,'
indoctri u tion and training shall be maintained by the Manpower Planning ,
and Development Department to indicate training received under this pro- ,
f)g
\
gram, date, special qualifications or restrictions. The Quality Assur-ance Engineering Education Specialist shall be responsible to maintain records for all Quality Assurance Engineering Department presonnel. ,
61094 A/3 75 PAGE 3 or 3 NUCLEAR QUALITY A55URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBASCO SERVICES PERSONNEL INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING QA-I-3 x mcom pon ATE PROGRAM IN QUALITY ASSURANCE 5.0 SCHEDULING 5.1 Tentative schedules shall be developed and kept on file for the presentation of applicable units of instruction included in this program.
5.2 Schedules for the presentations shall be maintained by the Manpower '
Planning and Development Department. 52 6.0 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT 6.1 This indoctrination and training program is subject to continuous development to broaden and improve its effectiveness. The Quality Assurance Education Specialist of-the Quality Assurance Engineering Department will hold periodic discussbns with the Manpower Planning R2 and Development Department personnel to coordinate recommendations R2 for updating.
,s 6.2 The documented quality assurance program will be revised by the Man u
/ power Planning and Development Department and reviewed and approved gy
\,_,} by the Quality Assurance Engineering Department as required to in- ,
corporate appropriately approved revisions of quality assurance governing documents.
7.0 ADMINISTRATION 7.1 The Manpower Planning and Development Department shall coordinate, ,'
develop, schedule, present, and document quality assurance train- ,
ing programs in cooperation with individual departments as set ,
I forth in Section QA-I-1 of this Manual. ,
7.2 The Quality Assurance Engineering Department shall define material ' -
related to the Quality Assurance Training Program and the recipients ' '
of the material. It shall review training programs for subject R2 matter content, provide technical expertise for developing programs, '
and review existing programs for currency. '
7.3 The heads of the various departments which have people working in '
them who are subject to the provisions of this Manual are responsible to see that these people attend the quality assurance training program (s) they are scheduled to attend. ',
8.0 AUDITS Periodic audit of these activities shall be performed to assure compli-
['~'} ance with this procedure. Such audits shall be performed in accordance
( ,,/ with the requirements of Section QA-II-9 af this Manual.
i
esos4n 75 PARE I 0F 1 EBASCO SERvlCE5 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioH INCORPORATED QA-I-3
- p. SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT I
l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION nevision Addendum 1
! j PERSONNEL IND0CTRINATION AND TRAINING
% ./g
^'" 3f4fg7
...,mu,, ...u .u.... PROGRAM IN QUALITY ASSURANCE
- 1. Paragraph 2.2:
- a. Delete existing subparagraphs (g) and (i).
- b. Add a new subparagraph (j):
(j) Safety - Related Construction Activities.
- 2. Paragraph 4.1:
- a. Revise to read as follows:
4.1 The following records of quality assurance indoctrination and train-ing program presentations shall be maintained by the Manpower Planning and Development Department, the Quality Assurance Engineering Department, and the S,TPEGS Site Quality Assurance Department.
\
(a) 3. Paragraph 4.2:
- a. Add the following sentences:
Site Quality Assurance Department shall maintain Individual Training Files for each person receiving Quality Assurance indoctrination and training at the STPEGS site. The training file for each individual shall be established at the STPEGS site prior to his/her performance of any safety-related site function.
I -
l
- 4. Paragraph 8.0:
Revise reference to Section QA-III-9 in lieu of QA-II-9.
O t
PAGE 1 OF b 41094/2 7$
EBASCO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
/'gg iNeoaponATe QA-I-5 QUALITY ASSURANCE EVALUATION OF
- l he.... % m...
..a..
To m SUPPLIERS / CONTRACTORS REVI$loN I g
l
. o, M
- p. . . . .p .. u . . .. n .
oarg 9/30/76 1.0 SCOPE The purpose of this section is to establish the criteria for the Quality Assurance capability of suppliers / contractors of safety-related items and services procured, either by means of purchase orders issued through.the Engineering and Site Officese or by means of Ccnstruction Contracts issued at the various construction sites.
Such suppliers / contractors shall be evaluated for their adherence to the portions of 10CFR50 Appendix E, ANSI N45.2 and other Ebasco requirements that are applicable to the items or services supplied.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES Quality Assurance Engineering shall be responsible to assure, through implementation of departmental procedures, that safety-related items and services procured by Ebasco at Engineering Offices and Construction Sites are procured only from vendors and contractors who meet the applicable requirements of this Section.
For site procurements involving purchase orders and construction contracts, the
,\ Senior Quality Control Supervisor or his designee may, attend and participate in
[h the evaluation of suppliers as described in Ebasco Site Quality Control Procedures.
3.0 QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Qualification of a supplier / contractor with regard to capability shall be determined from results of the following:
3.1.1 A review of the supplier's/ contractor's Quality Assurance manual.
3.1.2 A facility or site audit of the supplier's/ contractor's Quality Assurance program to assure satisfactory implementation of that program.
(Facility audits of Contractors' Quality Assurance programs shall be performed at the site af ter contract award but prior to start of install-ation of safety related items or performance of safety related work.)
3.1.3 Manufacturing Certificate of Authorization (i.e., ASME N-type stamp), if applicable.
3.2 For purchase orders issued by the Engineering and Site Offices, a supplier, to be considered qualified to be awarded a purchase order, must have satisfactorily met the requirements of Paragraph 3.1 above. For Con-struction Contracts issued by the Construction Department, a contractor may be awarded a construction contract before meeting the requirements of
- Paragraph 3.1 above, but this is contingent upon his satisfactorily meeting the requirements before starting any safety-related work.
f h v
stoo4A/ -7s Pace 2 or 4 g HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBA5CO SERVICES
\s_,)* mconeon Arco QUALITY ASSURANCE EVALUATION OF QA-I-5 SUPPLIERS / CONTRACTORS 3.0 QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 3.3 For Engineering and Site Of fices purchase orders, Quality Assurance Engineering shall maintain and issue, to appropriate department heads, a list of Vendors considered qualified with regard to Quality Assurance capability in accordance with Quality Assurance Engineering procedures. Only Vendors who have satisfactorily met requirements of Paragraph 3.1 above shall be included on this list. Safety-related items and services shall be purchased only from Vendors included on this list. A Vendor may be removed from this list if it
's found that unresolved conditions adverse to quality have developed and remain unresolved. _
For Construction Department Construction Contracts, the Manager of Construc-tion Engineering will maintain a file of Contractors who have satisfactorily met the requirements of Paragraph 3.1.
4.0 SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUALS 4.1 For Engineering and Site Offices purchase orders, vendor Quality Assurance manuals shall be submitted to Ebasco for review at the time the vendors submit
,s their bid, provided a previous submittal of the manual has not been made.
For Construction Department Construction Contracts, the Quality Assurance (x._ /) manuals shall be submitted either before or after award of a contract, but prior to performance of.any safety-related work.
4.2 All Quality Assurance manuals shall be reviewed by Quality Assurance j Engineering in accordance with' departmental procedures and check lists, which includes the requirement for independence of supplier inspection l personnel.
5.0 SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR FACILITY AUDITS 5.1 For purchase orders issued at the Engineering and Site Offices, the Quality Assurance Engineering Department, prior to award of a purchase order, shall conduct a Quality Assurance audit of the prospective supplier's facility in accordance with departmental procedures and checklists.
For Construction Contracts issued by the Construction Department, the Quality Assurance Engineering Department shall conduct a Quality Assurance audit of the prospective contractor's site facility either before or af ter award of contract but prior to start of any safety-related work. The Senior Quality Control Supervisor or his designee may participate in this audit.
v l
1
( --
stoe4A/2 7s Pact or NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION n
k coke'na$eo' o QUALITY ASSURANCE EVALUATION OF QA-I-5 SUPPLIERS / CONTRACTORS 5.0 SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR FACILITY AUDITS 5.2 Section QA-II-9 establishes the requirements for tt.s performance of supplier / contractor facility or site audits. These requirements are satisfied by the implementation of departmental procedures which include provisions for the following:
(a) Training and Qualification of Auditors (b) Proficiency of Audits (c) Audit Planning (d) Audit Notification (e) Audit Performance (f) Reporting of Audit Results (g) Audit Follow-Up t% j (b) Audit Records i
V (i) Trend Analysis of Audit Reports 6.0 PERIODIC RE-AUDITS
'6.1 All qualified suppliers / contractors shall have their Quality Assurance manual re-evaluated and their facility re-audited in accordance with an established schedule to determine continued compliance to applicable NRC, ANSI and Ebasco requirements. All re-audits shall be performed and docu-mented as specified in this section for initial audits.
6.2 The periodic re-audit schedule shall be determined by the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer or his designee. The frequency shall be established utilizing pre-award audit findings, supplier / contractor history and supplier trend analysis.
Maximum time for re-evaluation shall not exceed three years.
7.0 TREND ANALYSES OF SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR AUDIT REPORTS Copies of supplier / contractor audit reports or other appropriate documentation shall be submitted to the Ebasco Quality Program Coordinator. He shall make an' analysis of the available Quality Assurance data with respect to quality trends and formally report his findings to the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer and to the Chairman of the Quality Program Committee. The trend analyses and distribution of subsequent reports shall be made in accordance with the requirements of Quality Assurance Engineering procedure QA-D.3.
d
61094A/2 75 PAGE 6 or 4 HUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ES
( ,Yeo0,$E o )o QUALITY ASSURANCE EVALUATION OF QA-I-5 SUPPLIERS / CONTRACTORS 8.0 RECORDS All documents and records relating to a supplier's/ contractor's quality program and audit status shall be secured and maintained by the Quality Assurance Engineering Department at the Engineering Office for Engineering Offices purchase orders and by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor at the site for site purchase orders, all in accordance with departmental procedures and the applicable requirements of Section QA-I-6 of this manual.
Documents and records relating to Construction Contracts shall be secured through the Contracts Administrator and distributed to the Sr. Quality Control Supervisor for filing, all in accordance with departmental procedures and Section QA-I-6 of this manual. A copy of the contractors audit reports and any trend analyses should be sent to the Manager of Construction Engineering for future reference.
I i
l-1
pase I cr 2 sies4n.7s EBA5Co SERVICE 5 HUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTIO:4 INCORPORATED QA-I-5 m SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
) l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION Rcw.iOuAddendum 1
! fgAg QUALITY ASSURANCE EVALUATION OF
^7" 3f4fgp
% . .. u .. .u nfp ... u . . . . . u . . SUPPLIERS / CONTRACTORS v
- 1. Paragraph 1.0:
- a. Second line: Delete the word "either."
- b. Third line: Delete the following words " issued through the Engineering and Site Offices."
- c. Fourth line: Delete the last part of the sentence "... issued at the various construction sites." and add a period after " Contracts."
- 2. Paragraph 2.0:
- a. Revise to read as follows:
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee shall be responsible to assure, through implementation of departmental procedures, that safety-a)
\s /
related items and services procured by Ebasco Construction are procured only from Vendors and contractors who meet the applicable requirements of this section.
The Quality Control Site Supervisor or his designee may attend and parti-cipate in the evaluation of suppliers as described in Ebasco Site Quality Control procedures.
- 3. Paragraph 3.2:
- a. First line: Revise to read "For purchase orders issued by the Ebasco Construction Department,"
- 4. Paragraph 3.3:
- a. First line: Delete the beginning of the sentence "For Engineering and Site offices purchase orders,"
- b. Last sentence: Delete the word " Engineering." _
i S. Par'agraph 4.1: ,
i a. First line: Delete the beginning of the sentence "For, Engineering and
\g Site Offices purchase order," and commence sentence with
" Vendor Quali ty. . . "
sios-enos Pare .2 er 2 l
EBASCO SERVICE 5 NUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTloM inconponarso QA-I-5 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
- fm) j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATI0fi nevision Addendum 1 f< . gm.n
..u
,j pgf...u.....u. QUALITY ASSURANCE EVALUATION OF SUPPLIERS / CONTRACTORS
,,,, gj4fgp
- 6. Paragraph 5.0:
- a. Paragraph 5.1: Revise to read:
5.1 For purchase orders, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his de-signee, prior to award of a purchase order, shall conduct a Quality Assurance audit of the prospective supplier's facility in accordance with departmental procedures and checklists.
For Construction Contracts, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his de-signee shall conduct a Quality Assurance audit of the prospective contrac-tor's site facility either before or after award of contract but prior to start of any safety-related work. The Quality Control Site Supervisor or his designee may participate in this audit.
- b. Paragraph 5.2: Reference to Section QA-III-9 shall be used in lieu of Section QA-II-9.
(A) v
- 7. Paragraph 6.1:
- a. Fourth line revise to read "...and STPEGS requirements." in lieu of "Ebasco requirements."
- 8. Paragraph 6.2:
- a. Last line, end of paragraph. Revise.it to "one year" in lieu of "three years."
~
1
- 9. Paragraph 8.0: Revise to read:
8.0 RECORDS All documents and records relating to an Ebasco supplier's/ contractor's '
t quality program and audit status shall be secured and maintained by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor at the site in accordance with depart-I mental procedures Documents and records relating to Construction Contracts shall be secured through the Contracts Administrator and distributed to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor for filing, in accordance with departmental procedures. .A l
m copy of the contractor's audit reports and any trend analyses should be sent
)I to the Manager of Construction.for future reference.
' J'
n o.4n o.n pace 1 or 4 EBA5CO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION (g ~
encompomarzo QA-I-6 I
> [ [ [ h.o paw c =a . a a 6. e tow.a QUALI'IY ASSURANCE RECORDS R E VI SION 0
M4,.r-- care 3/14/75
< p ... .... .an n.s,..a.
1.0 SCOPE -
This section covers the requirements and guidelines for the collection, filing, storage disposition and maintenance of Lifetime and Nonpermanent Quality Assurance Records associated with the design, construction and maintenance of nuclear power plants. In addition to the requirements of this Section, Ebasco maintains, on a project basis, a Nuclear Project Filing System for the retention and retrieval of a predetermined list of project-related documents.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITY '
2.1 It shall be the responsibility of Ebasco to maintain Quality As-surance records in accordance with the requirements of this section until such time as those records are turned over to the Owner for per-manent storage. All QA Records shall be accessible to the Owner until such time as they are turned over to the Owner.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS SYSTEM l
O Each organization within Ebasco (including but not limited to the Engineering,
/ Purchasing, Construction and Quality Assurance departments) that participate in the generation, collection filing, storage, dispostion or maintenance of Quality Assurance Records shall establish a written quality assurance record system applicable to the function (s) performed by that organization. This system shall be implemented and enforced in accordance with the requirements of the following paragraphs that apply to the function (s) of that organization.
4.0 GENERATION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 4.1 The QA Records to be generated shall be specified in the applicable design specs, procurement documents, construction maintenance, test or inspection procedures and other documents as necessary.
l 4.2 All QA Records shall be dated and signed or otherwise authenticated.
l 4.3 QA Records shall be listed in an index which includes as a minimum:
4.1.1 QA Records retention times tretention period begins on date of satisfactory operation of items).
l 4.1.2 Location of storage area. >
4.1.3 Location of records within storage area.
l-
\ -
t, v
/
i
.ie,4a n.7. ,,og 2 o, 4 ,
HUCLEAR QUALITY A55URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
) EBA5CO SERVICES QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS QA-I-6 f(m/ INCORPORATEo 4.4 All QA Records shall be distributed and handled in accordance with written instructions.
4.5 There shall be sufficient information in the QA Records to permit identification between the records and the item (s) or activity to which it applies. Identification of records may be by purchase order number, system, or any means that permits accurate traceability.
4.6 All QA Records shall be classified as Lifetime or Nonpermanent.
4.7 When QA Records are corrected or supplemented they shall be reviewed or approved by the organization that originated the records. All corrections and supplements shall bear dates and authorized signatures.
4.8 Inspection and test records shall contain the following as applicable:
- a. A description of the type of observation.
- b. Evidence of completing and verifying a manufacturing, inspection or test operation.
- c. The date and results of the inspection or test.
- d. Information related to nonconformances.
e, Inspector or data recorder identification.
- f. A statement as to the acceptability of the results.
Q 5.0 RECEIPT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 5.1 QA Records to be furnished by suppliers, contractors or other external agencies shall be submitted to Ebasco in accordance with the requirements of the purchase order.
5.1.1 The purchase order shall make provisions for records to be accessible to Ebasco or the Owner if the records are maintained by the Supplier at his facility.
t 5.2 A system shall be established for receipt of QA records at the site which shall include:
5.2.1 A checklist designating the required QA Records.
l 5.2.2 A record of QA Records received.
5.2.3 Written procedures for receipt and inspection of incoming QA Records.
These Quality Assurance records shall be maintained by Quality Assurance Engineering or monitored by Quality Assurance Engineering to assure that they are maintained properly.
5.3 The system described in paragraph 4.2 shall permit an accurate assessment of the status of the QA Records during the receiving process, t ) 6.0 TEMPORARY STORACE, PRESERVATION AND SAFEKEEPING l
V 6.1 QA Records shall be stored in accordance with a written procedure which includes the following:
6.1.1 Description of storage area l
L
e soe4a/so-n nor 3 or- 4 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION (N EBA5CO SERVICES I INCoRpoR Af ro QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS QA-I-6 6.1.2 Filing system to be used 6.1.3 Method for verifying that QA Records received are in agree-ment with transmittal documents and pte-established records check-list 6.1.4 Rules governing access to files 6.1.4.1 A list shall be generated designating those person-nel who shall have access to the files.
6.1.5 Methods of maintaining control'of QA Records removed from storage. Such methods shall provide for signing out of QA Rec-ords removed from storage or other ' appropriate means of maintain-ing control of the location of the Ipl Records removed.
6.1.6 Method of filing supplemental information and disposing of obsolete QA Records. Supplemental information shall be filed with the original documents whenever practical.
'~'h 6.2 A custodian shall be designated to implement.the requirements of paragraph 6.1.
6.3 Records stored within a temporary storage facility shall be pro-tected from damage and loss. This includes:
6.3.1 Storage within fire resistant cabinets with a four hour under-writer's rating or a satisfactory alternative.
6.3.2 Protection from condensation.
6.3.3 Disallowance of loose documents. Records shall be attached to binders, placed in folders or similarly maintained.
6.3.4 Special processed QA Records such as radiographs, micro-film, etc. shall be stored and protected in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
6.4 A satisfactory alternative to the requirements of paragraph 6.3 is maintenance of duplicate QA Records stored in a separate remote location.
6.5 Audits shall be performed by each organization to assure the effect-iveness of its storage system, and shall include:
l-7 -ss
(.
i i
-._-- - --__- . ~ .- - - . . . -__ - _ _ - - - -- -- = _ _ . - - . _ . _ . . -_ .-
I J
em4a/so.n ,,,, 4 ,, 4 4
ESASCO SERVICE 3
'" C " " " " . QUALITY ASSURANr2 RECORDS QA-I-6 l
, 6.5.1 Surveys to assure that logged in QA Records are avail-j able in their proper location and in good condition.
- l. 6.5.2 Audit results shall be documented and discrepancies shall be re-audited to assure their correction.
- 6.6 The storage systems shall provide for accurate retrieval of QA
- Records without undue delay.
7.0 DISPOSITION OF QA RECORDS --
4 7.1 Upon transfer of QA Records, the Owner'shall acknowledge in writing the receipt of the particular QA Records.
1 i
l i
s l
~
I r
a,, , , , -, , , - , , , , , , - - - . , . -
, ,,,n- y4 . - ,
eso,4n.7s rAss I cr I l ,
EBASCO SERYlCES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioM inconronarco QA-I-6
! SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT l ELECTRIC GEfiERATIfiG STATI0f4 newsonAddendum 1 3/4/R2 l % . .,...
[...nby............... QUALITY ASSURAliCE RECORDS
^'"
I. Paragraph 3.0: Add the following insert in the fifth line, after organization:
Insert: These written procedures shall provide that each completed quality assurance record shall be transmitted by the organization generating the record to Ebasco Site Quality Assurance for final review and transmittal to the Client or his designee.
k I
I .
e O
s t oe4n.n pace 1 er 3 ESASCO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION INComPORATED 4
[N i 2 R8
> = . . . . . . . . . c . . . . .s o c . . 7 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS Me visio n Duc 3/4/81 R$
< c . . , .. .o n V ......i.
...c l'. 0 SCOPE 1.1 Activities affecting quality performed at the construction site shall be described in written instructions, procedures or drawings that have been developed in accordance with the requirements of this section. Departmental procedures which describe the manner in which activities affecting quality are to be accomplished are part of the Ebasco Quality Program.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Where the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual designates an individual or organization with the responsibility of performing quality related functions at the construction site, such functions shall be performed in accordance with written instructions, procedures or drawings that have been developed by the organization performing the function. These instructions, procedures and drawings shall establish the manner of performing the activity in accordance with the requirements of the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual R$
and of the organization performing the activity, p
2.2 When documented evidence is required for the satisfactory performance of particular activities, checklists, forms and/or other appropriate means shall be utilized to provide this evidence. Such documents shall be signed and dated by the party performing the activity.
2.3 Ebasco procedures, instructions, or drawings describing activities affec-ting quality which are qualitative or quantitative in nature (i.e., inspections or tests) shall contain or reference criteria for determing that such activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.
2.4 Ebasco field purchase orders shall designate those supplier test and/or ins}, action procedures to be submitted to Ebasco for review. The procedures required by the field Purchase Order will be reviewed by Ebasco Site Quality Assurance Engineering and/or other Ebasco disciplines as required.
3.0 DEVELOPMENT OF INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS 3.1 Implementing instructions, procedures or drawings for activities affecting quality at the construction site shall be developed by the Design Engineering R$
Department, Construction Department and Site Quality Assurance for their resp-ective quality related functions. The Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual shall be used as a guideline for their development. In addition, all Site Quality Control Procedures shall include at least the following:
v l
sios42nos scre 2 cr 3 HUCLEAR QUALITY A550RANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBASCO SERVICES I " " " * "
INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS QA-III-l
\_'
s a) Identification of characteristics to be inspected b) Identification of the individuals or groups responsible for performing the inspection operation c) Acceptance and rejection criteria .
d) A description of the method of inspection e) Verification of completion and certification of inspection f) A record of the results of the inspection operation 3.2 The Ebasco Standards and Procedures Department shall be responsible to develop company procedures of categories, such as Administrative (A), '
Engineering (E), Nuclear (N), Purchasing (PD), and Projects (PJ), as listed '
in Tables I-1.2 and I-1.3 of Section QA-I.1, pertaining to quality-related R$
functions performed by Engineering Departmentd Design or other home office '
based group at the construction site. '
3.3 Individual departments / disciplines (including, Construction Contractor) '
shall be responsible for the development of their own intradepartmental/ '
discipline instructions, procedures or drawings that establish the methods for R$
performing quality related functions. The Ebasco Standards and Procedures '
Department will provide, upon request, guidance and assistance in developing '
<- s the documente. '
4
! /
\
3.4 If so requested by a department, Quality Assurance Engineering shall act in an advisory capacity during the preparation of internal Ebasco proce-dures.
3.5 All procedures, instructions and drawings for activities affecting quality shs.ll be ident2fied, dated and shall provide authorized signature (s) of approval.
3.6 To assure that all Quality Control procedures and instructions comply with this manual, applicable codes and regulatory requirements, they shall be submitted for review and acceptance to Quality Assurance prior to implemen-tation. The Manager of Quality Control is responsible for the establishment R2 and maintenance of corporate Quality Control Program Standard Procedures. R2 General review of site originated quality control documents shall be performed by the Manager of Quality Control, or his designee.
4.0 DISTRIBifflON AND CONTROL R$
4.1 Each Ebasco Department shall be responsible for maintaining and enforcing a written system for the distribution and control of that organization's instructions, procedures and drawings for activities affecting quality. This system shall provide for at least the following:
4.1.1 Copies of these documents and revisions thereto shall be distrib-
-~s uted to all appropriate department personnel in a timely manner.
i k
s toe 4An.n paes 3 cr 3 l NUCLEAR QUALITY A55URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBASCO SERVICE 5 sNcoaaoastro INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS QA-III-l V
i 4.1.2 Outdated and/or superseded documents shall either be collected or shall be clearly marked as superseded to avoid inadvertent use.
- 4.1.3 A file of the latest revision of these documents shall be maintained. Such a file shall be readily available to all affected personnel.
4.1.4 A log of the documents shall be maintained. The log shall indicate as a minimum:
a) title of document b) document identification number c) latest revision number and date of document presently in use 4.2 An historical file of all revisions and changes to procedures and drawings shall be maintained by the department responsible for the issuance of the original procedure or drawing.
)
i I
i
\
l
68094/2 7$ PA22 1 CF EBASCo SERVICES HUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTloM INCORPORATED QA-III-1 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT p l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION nevil0,, Addendum 1
[, , ,, , , ,, , , , INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS "" 3/4 #
- 1. Paragraph 3.1: Delete the following:
- a. Second line last two words " Design Engineering"
- b. Third line first word " Department,"
- 2. Paragraph 3.2: Delete in its entirety.
- 3. Paragraph 3.6: Revise to read:
3.6 To assure that all Ebasco Quality Control and Construction procedure and instructions comply with this manual, site-specific requirements, and applicable codes and regulatory requirements, they shall be submitted for review and acceptance to Ebasco Site Quality Assurance prior to implemen-tation. When required by the Contract, Quality Control, Special Process and Construction Procedures and instructions shall also be submitted to the client or his designee for acceptance prior to implementation.
- 4. Paragraph 3.7: Add a new paragraph:
1 J l 3.7 Qualifications and certification for Site Quality Control personnel will be covered in a Quality Control Procedure, " Indoctrination, Training and Qualification." Qualification Records will be maintained by Ebasco Site Quality Assurance for all Quality Control personnel assigned to the site. These records will be audited initially by the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer, or his designee, for compliance with the qualification f requirements and thereafter on an annual basis by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor. The Quality Control Site Supervisor shall coordinate ar.d direct the training and qualification of Quality Control personnel. Any deficiencies shall be reported in writing by the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer, or his designee, to the Quality Control Site Supervisor for reso-lution. Pending resolution of the deficiency, the individual shall be re-strained from performing any Quality Control activities.
The Quality Program Site Manager is assigned to the project construction site on a resident basis. The Quality Program Site Manager is responsible for the Quality Assurance and Quality Controi functions at the construction site. The Quality Program Site Manager will have full authority to monitor, control, direct and report on all the work under tlue Quality Program.
O
6109 4 /2-75 PAGE d CF 2 EB A5CO SERvlCES HUCLEAR QUALITY A55URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION incomponareo QA-III-1 n SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
( j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATI0ti ncymou Addendum 1 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS ^'" *#
He will interface directly with the STP Quality Assurance Manager, or his designee and report to the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer. He is subor-dinate to no individual on site, has the independent authority and respon-sibility to identify site quality related problems. Assisting the Quality Program Site Manager at the site will be the Quality Assurance Site Super-visor, the Quality Control Site Supervisor and the Quality Records Super-visor.
- 5. Paragraph 4.1: Revise to read:
4.1 Each Ebasco Department shall be responsible for maintaining and en-forcing a written system for the distribution and control of that organiza-tion's instructions, procedures and drawings (other than design i.e. rigging ,
drawings) for activities affecting quality. This system shall provide for '
at least the following:
O 6
3 0
- - - - , = -
sios4n.7s pace 1 or 2 EBASCO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION INCORPORATED x QA-III-2 I 2 R2 V > c...............,c..
DOCUMENT CONTROL . c y, s, o y oare 3/4/81 R2 v
1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This section of the Manual establishes the requirements for the control of all construction site documents which have an effect on quality related activi-ties. These requirements apply to those documents prepared for each individual project, such as specifications and drawings, as well as to instruction and procedures which control or direct activities affecting quality.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The Senior Resident Engineer shall be responsible for the distribution of Ebasco drtwings, specifications, construction procedures, special process procedures and quality control procedures and plans at the construction site.
2.2 The Quality Control Site Supervisor shall be responsible for the control R2 of Ebasco Quality Control procedures and plans at the construction site.
2.3 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor shall be responsible for the dis-(' '}
(__,/
tribution and control of Quality Assurance Engineering Procedures at the construction site.
2.4 The Field Purchasing Agent shall be responsible for the issuscce and control of purchase documents.
3.0 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS Distribution and control of design drawings and specifications whether generated by the Engineering Office, at the construction site or by suppliers for field purchase orders, shall be accomplished by means of a drawing and specification File Card ,
system. Construction procedures require that each drawing and specifi- R2 cation be recorded on a File Card, showing all pertinent information regarding the document such is title, revision number and the individuals or organizations to which the document has been distributed. A document receipting system shall be used which requires written acknowledgement of receipt of the distributed document.
4.0 PROCEDURES-CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT Distribution and control of Ebasco construction procedures and special process R2 procedures shall be accomplished by means of a procedure File Card System. Each procedure shall be recorded on a file card showing the procedure title and revision, and indicating the individuals or organizations to which the document has been distributed. A document receipting system shall be used which requires written
_ acknowledgement of receipt of the distributed document.
(G s
sio,4a/2 7s Paer 2 cr 2 _
NUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBASCO SERVICES mcoapoa ATro DOCUMENT CONTROL QA-III-2 Q
5.0 PROCEDURES-QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEERING Quality Assurance Engineering procedures describing auditing responsibilities of R2 Site Quality Assurance shall be distributed and controlled at the constrertion site in " book" form. A master file shall be maintained of all procedures and revisions. A master list shall be maintained indicating each person or organiza-tion to whom a book of procedures has been issued. New or revised procedures will be issued to each holder of a procedure " book". A' receipt system shall be used which requires written acknowledgement of distributed procedures.
Quality Control and Records Control procedures describing implementation and '
responsibilities of Quality Control and Records Control activities shall be '
developed, reviewed, approved, distributed and controlled using the existing R2 documents control system established at the construction site. '
6.0 FIELD PURCHASE. ORDERS Distribution of field purchase orders and supplements thereto shall be in accordance with an established distribution schedule prepared at the site. A master file shall be maintained by the Field Purchasing Agnet of all field purchase orders and p supplements thereto. A status list shall be distributed periodically indicating the purchase orders and supplements which have been issued at the construction site.
7.0 CHANGES TO DOCUMENTS Changes to documents shall be reviewed and approved by the same organizations as for the original documents, unless delegated in writing by the originating organization to another responsible organization. Changes to drawings, specifications or proced-ures shall be distributed in the same manner as the original document and the super-ceded document shall be destroyed or designated void to avoid inadvertent use, or shall be returned to the distributor for such disposition.
8.0 AUDITS Periodic audits shall be performed by Site Quality Assurance in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of this Manual to assure that controlled documents are being properly distributed and maintained current.
4
~t O
sios.sn.7s PAac 1 or 1 EBA5CO SERVICES ' NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN inconponATro QA-III-2 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT 4
S j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATI0fl nevisio,. Addendum i b DOCUMENT CONTROL omre 3/4/89
,./ ........
e
- 1. Paragraph 1.0: Delete on third and fourth line the following:
. . . prepared for each individual project.. ."
l
- 2. Paragraph 2.1: Delete word "Ebasco" on second line, and add the following:
He shall be responsible for the controlled distribution of drawings, specifications, procedures, and similar documents furnished by the Client or the Client's representative 'when Ebasco Services, Inc., is not responsible for design.
- 3. Paragraph 3.0: Second line, revise to read "Bechtel Engineering" in lieu of
" Engineering Office."
- 4. Paragraph 6.0: Third line, revise the word "Agnet!" to " Agent."
Tt C'. 1 7,
uou n.n pact I or 1 l
EBA5CO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL S ECTION l incoaponareo QA-III-3 l
/m)
- bk /.A PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL ,, y,3,0, 1
~
o,7, 2/29/80
- . ..,~. ,,,... yp ,. ......
v 1.0 SCOPE This Section of the Manual describes the system of control which governs the pre-paration, review, approval and revision of documents used for procurement of items and services by Ebasco at the construction site.
2.0 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTENTS 2.1 Procurement documents shall make provision for the following:
s) Supplier Quality Assurance Program.
b) Technical requirements (including classification).
c) Accessability to suppliers' and suppliers' facilities for s'ource inspection and audit.
d) Documentation requirements.
[}
(/
e) Extension, as required of procurement document requirements to lower tier suppliers.
2.2 Inclusion of the requirements of paragraph 2.1 above is assured during the review by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor, or his designee from R1 the Quality Assurance Engineering Deparrment, of the Purchase requisition R1 package as described in Section QA-III-4 of this Manual. Where a specifica-tion developed by the Engineering Office is to be used for site procurement, inclusion of the requirements of Paragraph 2.1 above is assured during the review of the specification by the Project QA Engineer as described in Section QA-I-4.
2.3 Control of the procurement documents after release to purchasing and prior to purchase order, is described in Section QA-III-4 of this Manual.
2.4 Changes to procurement documents are subject to the same system of control as was the original document. This requirement is as described in Section QA-III-4 of this Manual.
l
( 4
\
i
~
sm4n.n Pass I er I 1
EBA5CO SERYlCES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MAHL'AL SECTIO s uco m po n AT a c, A-III-3 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GEllERATIf4G STATI0ft newsiou Addendum 1
{
"^75 3#4##
. . .......... PROCUREMEf1T DOCUMENT C0t4 TROL
- 1. Paragraph 2.2: Revise to read 2.2 fnclusion of the requirements of paragraph 2.1 above is assured during the review by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering Department, of the Purchase requisition package as described in Section QA-III-4 of this Manual. Where a specifi-cation developed by Bechtel Engineering is to be used for site procurement, inclusion of the requirements of Paragraph 2.1 above is assured during the r'eview of the contract package as described in Section QA-III-4.
O a
i t
4 0
i stos4/2 75 PAGE I Or 7
" " ' " ' " " ' ' ' " ' " " " ^ * ' ' ' " "'""'""
("j ' ' ' ' ' " '
INCORPORATED
- 4 R4 g o. . . . . . . . .. n . m a . - . - . CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCUREMENTS R E Vi $1O N I< onTE
! R4 v
1.0 SCOPE This section of the manual describes the system of controls under which Field Purchase Orders and Construction Contracts for safety-related items and/or services is accomplished by the Construction Department.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The Field Purchasing Agent coordinates activities related to the purchase of items for which purchase orders are issued at the construc-tion site.
2.2 The Manager of Construction Engineering prepares the bidding and contract docunents for major construction contracts and the Project Superintendent for minor construction contracts.
s 2.3 The Senior Resident Engineer, Assistant Construction Superintendent
) or their designees from the Construction Department prepares the initial R4 Q requisition package, which includes a technical' description of the items required to be purchased.
2.4 The Senior Resident Engineer is also responsible for the technical adequacy of the requisition package, as well as technical evaluation of bidders' proposals.
2.5 The Quality Control Site Supervisor or his designee, from the R4 Quality Assurance Engineering Department reviews quality-related R4 aspects of purchase order and construction contract documents when prepared by the site.
2.6 The Project Quality Assurance Engineer or his designee from the R4 Quality Assurance Engineering Department reviews quality-related aspects R4 of construction contracts prepared under the direction of the Manager of Construction Engineering.
2.7 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor is responsible for the following:
2.7.1 Review of requisition packages and site-prepared construction contract documents to assure that they contain all quality-related requirements.
2.7.2 Review of proposed exceptions to quality assurance require-O ments made by bidders.
2.7.3 Providing quality assurance evaluation of bidders by either direct evaluation or by requesting euch evaluation through the Ebasco Engineering Office Quality Assurance Engineering Staff, or a combination thereof.
I sioe4a/2 7s paos 2 o, 7 l l
NUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN '
/ ESA5CO SERVICES
( pe coa co m a t e o CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCUREMENTS QA-III-4 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES (cont'd) 2.8 Performance of activities by those individuals and organizations in paragraphs 2.1 through 2.7 above shall be in accordance with approved written procedures and/or instruction.
3.0 PROCUREMENT PROCESS - FIELD PURCHASE ORDERS 3.1 The Senior Resident Engineer, Assistant Construction Superintendent, or their designees shall prepare the requisition package for submittal to the Field Purchasing Agent.
3.1.1 The requisition package will identify the item (s) required as well as the safety and/or seismic classification thereof, and will include a technical description of t' e item (s). The technical description may consist of:
(a) Specification (s) and/or drawing (s) eveloped and approved in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-I-4 of this manual.
p (b) "Commerically Available Material" or " Unique Order Method" description:
Where the iten:s to be purchased are of such a nature that a formal design specification or drawing may be warranted (commercially available, raw material, gas stock, nuts and bolting, weld rod) a technical description will be written by the Senior Resident Engineer or his designee including the appropriate ASME, ASTM, AWS, IEEE or other designations as may be required to adequately define the item and applic-able USNRC or other regulatory requirements regarding quality assurance programs. This description shall be supplemented with appropriate quality-related require-ments (i.e. tests, inspection, documentation) by the originator of the requisition, subject to review by the Quality Control Site Supervisor or his designee. R4 3.1.2 The proposed requisition package shall be submitted by the Senior Resident Engineer to the following for review, prior to being released to the Field Purchasing Agent.
(a) Site Design Engineering, where applicable, for R4 technical adequacy R4
- ~ (b) Quality Control Site Supervisor for review for R4 the quality-related aspects of the package.
m\
, [O
sioe4*n n paos 3 or 7 HUCLEAR QUALITY A55URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBASCO SERVICES (s inconeonareo CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCUREMENTS QA-III-4 3.0 PROCUREMENT PROCESS - FIELD PURCHASE ORDERS (cont'd) 3.1.2 (cont'd)
(c) Quality Assurance Site Supervisor for review to assure that the following Quality Assurance Requirements are included:
(1) Classification (Safety, Seismic)
(2) Applicable regulatory, code and design requirements (3) Quality Assurance Program requirements (4) Requirements for submittal of supplier documents such as drawings, specifications, procedures, inspection and test records, and other documents to be provided to purchaser prior to, during or upon completion of execution of the purchase order.
(5) Requirements for retention, control and maintenance
/'~'N of supplier QA records.
(6) Provisions for Ebasco, Client and NRC right of access to supplier's facilities and work documents for surveillance, inspection and audit.
(7) Provision for supplier reporting and disposition of nonconformances from the purchase order 3.1.3 Comments resulting from the above reviews shall be documented and all comments shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the reviewing party and written concurrence shall be obtained prior to release for Inquiry. A history file shall be maintained by the Senior Resident Engineer for each requisition package initiated, and shall provide written evidence of required reviews as well as reconciliation of comments from such reviews.
3.2 Propspective Vendors are selected by the Field Purchasing Agent from one or more of the following sources:
(a) Project vendors' lists, provided by Quality Assurance Engineering (b) Favorable Past Experience (within past three years).
(c) Satisfactory evaluation in accordance with Ebasco Company Procedure A-16, entitled " Qualification of Prospective Bidders" R4
- ('~'y
! 4 (d) Client preference (d
(e) Other Vendors who demonstrate adequate qualification.
s to64 A/2 75 PAGE 4 0F 7 NUCLEAR QUAUTY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ESASCO SERVICES mcom pon A r eo CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCUREMENT QA-III-4 3.0 PROCUREMENT PROCESS - FIELD PURCHASE ORDERS (cont'd) 3.3 The Field Purchasing Agent shall inform the Quality Assurance Site R4 Supervisor and the Quality Control Site Supervisor of any quality R4 assurance program evaluations of vendors that may be required. Where a current acceptable evaluation is on file for the particular vendor, this fact need only be confirmed in writing by Quality Assurance Engineering. If such is not the case, an evaluation shall be performed by Quality Assurance Engineering in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-I-5 of this Manual. The Quality Control Site Supervisor R4 may participate in the evaluation and in either case shall be informed i
in writing as to the results of such an evaluation. The Quality Assurance R4 Site Supervisor shall advise cognizant Construction Department Personnel R4 of the results of all evaluations.
3.4 The Field Purchasing Agent shall assemble the Inquiry package for transmittal to selected prospective vendors in accordance with written procedures. Other copies shall be distributed in accordance with the Project Distribution Schedule.
- The Inquiry package shall include a requirement that the Vendor submit with his proposal a controlled copy of his Quality Assurance Manual.
(}
( /
This requirement may only be waived when it has been determined that a controlled copy of the Manual is already on file ~with Ebasco Quality Assurance Engineering and has been verified to be current.
3.5 The review and evaluation of vendor's proposals shall be co-ordinated by the Field Purchasing Agent. Vendors' proposals shall be reviewed, dispositioned and documented as described below.
3.5.1 The Field Purchasing Agent is responsible for evaluation of the commercial aspects of vendors' proposals.
3.5.2 The Senior Resident Engineer is responsible for technical evaluation.
! 3.5.3 All proposed exceptions relating to materials, testing, special processes, inspection, records and documentation, QA program or other areas important to quality shall be reviewed by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor., Comments resulting from this review shall be resolved prior to award of a contract.
c 3.5.4 Evaluation of proposed technical exceptions shall be made by the Senior Resident Engineer. Any technical changes shall be approved by the Senior Resident Engineer and/or the Design Engin- R4 eering discipline responsible for the original technical content. R4
5 7 sioe4an.n ,4ag ,,
HUCLEAR QUAUTY A55URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
/ ESA5CO SERvlCES
( ) sNcomponaTro CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCUREMENTS QA-III-4 3.0 PROCUREMENT PROCESS - FIELD PURCHASE ORDERS (cont'd) 3.5.5 Dispositions of all proposed technical exceptions are to be fully documented. The Senior Resident Engineer shall maintain a back-up file which substantiates acceptance of any technical differences between the proposals and the Inquiry.
In addition, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor shall maintain a back-up file documenting the results of evaluation of QA-related proposed exceptions.
3.5.6 The Field Purchasing Agent has the overall responsibility for assuring that all required proposal evaluations, both technical and commercial, are performed and resolved and i documented prior to issuance of a purchase order.
f 3.6 If technical exceptions are to be made and accepted, the Senior Resident Engineer, prior to issuance of a Purchase Order, shall initiate a Field Change Request to Design Engineering, who in turn shall revise the specification and/or drawing (s) as necessary to R4 incorporate any changes resulting from the proposal evaluation.
Such revisions shall be made in accordance with the requirements of
/'~'S Section QA-I-4 of the Manual. Where no formal specification or
( ,) drawing is involved, the Senior Resident Engineer shall be responsible for incorporating approved changes to the technical description.
3.7 A check list shall be used by the Field Purchasing Agent to assure that all prerequisites have been satisfied. This check list shall include provisions for the following:
(a) Reconciliation of bidder exceptions (b) Technical evaluations, including reconciliation .
of bidder exceptions and Field change request (s)
(c) QA approval of the Bidder (d) Special considerations (such as Client approval)
(e) Concurrence of Project Superintendent (f) Package completeness (specification, attachments, drawings, etc.)
f sioo4an.n paos 6 or 7 NUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBA$CO SERVICES
,_s/ CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCUREMENTS QA-ITI-4 3.0 PROCUREMENT PROCESS - FIELD PURCHASE ORDERS (cont'd) 3.8 Upon completion of all prerequisites, the Field Purchasing Agent shall prepare the Purchase Order Package, transmit the Purchase Order Package to the successful bidder, and distribute copies of the purchase orders for Safety-related items and services in accordance with the Project Distribution Schedule.
3.9 Supplements to purchase orders which involve changes to technical
, requirements are subject to the same review and approval process as the original purchase order. A change to the technical content of a purchase order may only be approved by the Senior Resident Engineer and/
or the organization responsible for the original technical content.
Supplements to purchase orders involving only commercial changes do not require this approval process.
3.10 Purchase Orders for spare or replacement parts must be processed 4
in accordance with the same requirements which applied to the purchase order for the original item.
4.0 PROCUREMENT PROCESS - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS I ) 4.1 Evaluation of lists of prospective bidders.will be made by the k_,/
s Project Soperintendent and the Construction Manager. The Manager of Construction Engineering will maintain a file of qualified bidders.
Preparation of the invitation to bid will be the responsibility of the Manager of Construction Engineering for major items of work and the Project Superintendent for minor items of work, both with the approval of the Construction Manager. Evaluation of bids will be the ,
responsibility of the Senior Resident Engineer. The Quality Assurance R4 Site Supervisor is responsible for evaluation of Quality Assurance requirements.
4.2 Prior to issuance of bidding documents to Bidders, Quality Assurance Engineering shall review the quality related aspects of the bid invitations to assure that the documents contain or reference the requirements necessary for safety related items and services. In cases where it becomes necessary to issue bidding documents simultaneously to Bidders and Quality Assurance Engineering, all comments and excep-tions made by Quality Assurance Engineering regarding Quality Assurance requirements shall be resolved prior to award of a contract. Exceptions taken by Bidders to Quality related aspects of a Bid shall also be reviewed by Quality Assurance Engineering and resolved before award of a contract.
4.3 A contract award may be made prior to and contingent upon acceptance of the Contractor's Quality Assurance Program. In such cases, prior to start of any safety-related work, a site evaluation of the Contractor's Quality Assurance Programs shall be performed by Quality Assurance
(_,/}
/
Engineering in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-I-5 of this Manual.
s too4an-7s pass 7 or 7 HUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ESA5CO SERVICES iNcomponAtto CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCUREMENTS QA-III-4 4.0 PROCUREMENT PROCESS - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS (cont'd) 4.4 Supplemental Orders to Construction Contracts which involve change RJ to or add technical requirements are subject to the same review and approval '
process as the original contract. A change to the technfcal content of a ,
Construction Contract may only be approved by the Senior Resident Engineer and/or the organization responsible for the original technical content. '
Supplements to Construction Contracts involving only commercial changes do '
not require this approval process.
l l
l l
l O
sios4/s.7s raza 1 er 3 ESA5CO SERYlCES NUCLEAR QUALITY A%URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioM INCORPORATED . QA-III-4.
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT n) j ELECTRIC GEf4ERATIt4G STATI0fi nevisO Addendum 1 C0fiTRUCTI0ft SITE PROCUREMEtiTS 5^ 3/4/"
- 1. Paragraph 2.2: Revise to read:
2.2 The Senior Resident Engineer, Assistant Construction Superintendent or their designees prepares the bidding and contract documents for construction contracts. ,
- 2. Paragraph 2.4: Revise to read:
2.4 The Senior Resident Engineer or his designee is also responsible for the technical adequacy of the requisition package, as well as obtaining technical evaluation of bi.dders' proposals (and proposed exceptions) from Bechtel Engineering.
- 3. Paragraph 2.6: Delete all.
- 4. Paragraph 2.7: Revise to read:
2.7 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor is responsible for the following:
2.7.1 Review of requisition packages, purchase oraers, and site-pre-pared . construction contract documents to assure that they contain all quality-related requirements.
2.7.2 Review of proposed exceptions to quality assurance requirements made by bidders, including interface with Bechtel QA for evaluation of exceptions.
2.7.3 Providing quality assurance evaluation of bidders by either direct evaluation or by requesting such evaluation through the Quality Assyrance Staff.
- 5. Paragraph 3.1.1(a): Revise to read:
(a) Bechtel Engineering Specification (s) and/or drawing (s).
- 6. Paragraph 3.1.2(a): Revise to read:
- t (a) Bechtel Engineering, where. applicable, for technical adequacy.
siou n.n nec cr EBA5CO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION INCORPORATED OA-III-4 m ,
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION navimou Addendum 1 g
CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCUREMENTS cats 3/4/82
/. . Paragraph 3.1.2 (b): Delete all.
- 8. Paragraph 3.1.2 (c) (6): Revise to read:
(6) Provisions for Ebasco, Client or his designee and NRC right of access to supplier's facilities and work documents for surveillance, inspec-tion, and audit.
- 9. Paragraph 3.2 (a): Revise the word " Project" to " Approved."
- 10. Paragraph 3.3: Revise to read:
3.3 The Field Purchasing Agent shall infonn the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor of any quality assurance program evaluations of vendors that may be required. Where a current acceptable evaluation is on file for the particular vendor, this fact need only be confirmed in writing by Quality Assurance Engineering. If such is not the case, an evaluation shall be performed by Quality Assurance Engineering. The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor shall advise cognizant Construction Department Personnel of the results of all evaluations.
- 11. Paragraph 3.4: Delete last sentence. ("Other copies...")
U!. Paragraph 3.5.2: Revise to read:
3.5.2 The Senior Resident Engineer is responsible for obtaining technical evaluation from Bechtel Engineering.
- 11. Paragraph 3.5.4: Revise to read:
3.5.4. Evaluation of proposed technical exceptions shall be made by Bechtel Engineering. Any technical changes shall be approved by Bechtel Engineering.
- 14. Paragraph 3.5.5: Add on third line after " substantiates" the following:
"Bechtel Engineering" .
U
3 sios.e n.7s Pace 3 er EBA5Co SERYlCES NUCt. EAR QUALITY A%URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN INCORPOR ATED ~. QA-III-4
. SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION .
navis,ow Addendum 1
"^7" ##
, ,,,,,,,,,,, CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCUREMENTS
- 15. Paragraph 3.6: Revise to read:
3.6 If technical exceptions are to be made and accepted, the Senior Resident Engineer, prior to issuance of a Purchase Order, shall initiate a field ~ change request to Bechtel Engineering, who in turn shall review it, and upon its acceptance revise the specification and/or drawing (s) as necessary to inc6.porate any changes resulting from the proposal evaluation.
Where no formal specification or drawing is. involved, the Senior Resident Engineer shall be. responsible for incorporating changes approved by Bechtel Engineering to the' technical description.
- 16. Paragraph 3.8: Last Line. Revise to read STP Ebar.cocconstre'ction.p'rocedures in lieu of " Project Distribution Schedule.
- 17. Paragraph 3.9:
- a. Add at end of fourth line: "Bechtel Engineering" d b. Delete fif th line "...or the organization... content."
- c. Delete last sentence: " Supplements to purchase..."
- 18. Paragraph 4.1: Revise to read:
4.1 Evaluation of lists of prospective bidders will be made by the Project Superintendent and the Construction Manager. The Manager of Construction Engineering will maintain a file of qualified bidders. Preparation of the invitation to bid will be the .responsibil-ity of the Senior Resident Engineer or his designee with the approval of the Site Manager. The Senior Resident Engineer is responsible for obtaining technical evaluation of bids from Bechtel Engineering. The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor is responsible for evaluation of Quality Assurance requirements.
- 19. Paragraph 4.4: ,
- a. dd to fourth line: "with concurrence from Bechtel Engineering"
(
l b. Delete fifth line: "and/or the ... content."
- c. Delete last sentence: " Supplements to purchase..."
.O
)4
%) . ;
\
i
-~
stos en.7s **cc 1 or 6 EBASCO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION incommonare
_ OA-III-5 G i n %..... . . ...SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR SURVEILLANCE
- . .... W... acvisioN 1 R3 oate 3/4/81 R3
- ........ ... ,,1.....
/ .. ........
v
'3 . 0 SCOPE This section of the manual describes the system of control which assures that safety-related items and services procured by the Ebasco Construction Department by means of purchase orders and/or construction contracts are supplied in accor-dance with the requirements of the purchase order or construction contract. At Ebasco's descretion, supplier / contractor surveillance may be performed on safety-related items procured by Site Contractors as a part of construction contracts.
2.0 CENERAL 2.1 Where items to be procured are of such a nature that determination as to whether or not the procurement requirements have been satisfied may not be readily accomplished during a receiving inspection or site inspection, surveillance shall be required at the supplier's/ contractor's facility in accordance with the requirements of this section of the manual.
2.2 Where purchased or contracted items are of such a nature that deter-mination as to whether or not the procurement documents requirements have
,O been satisfied may be accomplished during a receiving inspection, surveil-V lance may not be required at the supplier's/ contractor's facility. Examples of such instances may include purchase of raw material, bar stock, nuts and bolting.
3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The Field Purchasing Agent shall distribute copies of all safety-related Ebasco field purchase orders in accordance with the Project Distribution Schedule. The Project Superintendent, or his designee, shall distribute copies of all safety-related Ebasco Construction contracts in accordance with the
~
Project Distribution Schedule.
3.2 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor shall be responsible for perform-ance of the following functions:
3.2.1 Determine whether or not the item to be procured shall require surveillance.
3.2.2 A notation is to be made in the respective file for the order or contract as to whether or not surveillance is required, including the basis for the decision.
3.2.3 Where surveillance is to be performed by Vendor Quality Assurance
- Representatives, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee shall:
v
61094A/3 75 PAgg 7 oF b NUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION C ESASCO SERVICES INCOMPoR ATED SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR SURVEILLANCE QA-III-5 3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES (cont'd)
(a) Prepare Quality Assurance Plan for items and transmit it to Chief, Vendor Quality Assurance.
(b) Review those supplier's contractor's procedures required by the purchase order or construction contract.
(c) Review supplier's/ contractor's radiographs, as required.
(d) Review Quality Assurance Reports.
(e) Process nonconformance reports relating to site purchase orders and construction contracts as described herein.
3.3 Where supplier / contractor surveillance is to be performed by Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives, the Chief Vendor Quality Assurance, or his designee, assigns Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives to field purchare orders and construction contracts according to the particular area of expertise required (electrical, mechanical, etc.) and assures that each is adequately trained and indoctrinated. Responsibilities of the Vendor Quality Assurance Representative may include the following:
(a) Witness inspections and special processes (b) Review supplier's/ contractor's personnel qualification records (c) Review material certification (d) Review records of tests and inspections (e) Review supplier's/ contractor's procedures for indication of Ebasco review
] (f) Complete forms and reports as required by Quality Assurance Plan 3.4 The Quality Control Site Supervisor may elect to provide Ebasco Quality R3 Control Personnel to perform a supplier / contractor surveillance. When supplier / contractor surveillance is performed by Ebasco Quality Control
. personnel in lieu of Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives, the surveil-lance activities shall be performed by qualified personnel in accordance with the same written instructions and procedures used by the Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives, and shall be performed in accordance with all the i requirements of this section.
l'
.O
siouan.n pace 3 or 6 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EsAsco SERVICE 5 SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR SURVEILLANCE QA-III-5 4.0 VENDOR QUALITY ASSURANCE REPRZSENTATION PROGRAM 4.1 The Chief, Vendor Quality Assurance, assures that all Vendor Quality Assurance Repr entatives receive adequate training and indoctrination. A written approved program defines the manner in which such indoctrination and training is accomplished.
4.2 The Chief, Vendor Quality Assurance or his designee, is responsible for providing Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives with the instructions and procedures necessary for the performance of their duties. In addition to instructions and procedures, certain specific information is assembled for transmittal to, and use by, the Vendor Quality Assurance Representative with regard to each assigned purchase order or contract. This specific information includes the following:
(a) Purchase order or construction contract and supplements, including specification and appropriate attachments (b) Quality Assurance Plan (c) Transmittal letters for Ebasco review of supplier's/
contractor's procedures 4.3 Where information is transmitted to the Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives, evidence is retained to document such actions.
4.4 After issuance of a purchase order or construction contract and prior to start of fabrication; the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee.
f rom the Quality Assurance Engineering Department prepares and forwards to the R3 Chief, Vendor Quality Assurance, the Quality Assurance Plan for use by the Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives. The function of this plan is to indicate to the Vendor Quality Assurance Representative those operations, tests, records or other activities over which the Vendor Quality Assurance Represen-tative is to provide surveillance.
4.4.1 The Quality Assurance Plan consists of a checklist indicating those operations the Vendor Quality Assurance Representative is required to witness or observe, as well as the records and documentation he is to review such as: fabrication, inspection and test records; personnel qualifications; material certifications; fabrication and test procedures (to be checked for indication of Ebasco review).
4.4.2 Depending on the nature of the material or equipment being supplied, the Quality Assurance Plan may specify additional Ebasco forms which are required to be completed by the Vendor Quality Assurance Representative to document the witnessing of welding, nondestructive examination, j-electrical testing and other specific activities. The Quality Assurance Plan provides for sign-off and dating by the Vendor Quality Assurance i Representative for each required operation.
'Y
sios4 An.rs maar 4 or 6 NUCLEAR QUAUTY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION bh ESASCO SERVICES QA-III-5
( incomeomarzo SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR SURVEILLANCE' 4.0 VENDOR QUALITY ASSURANCE REPRESENTATION PROGRAM (cont'd) 4.5 The Vendor Quality Assurance Representative is required to document each surveillance visit to a supplier's/ contractor's facility on a Quality Assurance Report in which he includes the names and titles of supplier's i personnel contracted, a description of his activities, including noncon-formances noted, as well as any other discrepant areas to be checked during future surveillance visits. The Project Distribution Schedule provides for the distribution of Quality Assurance Reports for Site purchased and con-tracted items.
4.6 ' All nonconformances to purchase order or construction contract require-ments which render the quality of an item or service unacceptable shall be reported to.the Ebasco Quality Assurance Site Supervisor.
4.6.1 When a,nonconformance is detected by an Ebasco Vendor Quality
~
Aasurance. Rep'resentative in the supplier's/ contractor's shop, he shall initiate a ,0uality Assurance Engineering Nonconformance Report form, detailing the description of the nonconformance on the form and obtain-ing a recommended disposition from the cognizant supplier / contractor personnel. This report shll then be forwarded to the Quality Assurance g'~'s Site Supervisor for processing.
]
\ ?
'- ' 4.6.2 All nonconformances detected by the supplier / contractor that are dispositioned as " repair", " rework" or "use-as-is" and will not conform to Ebasco specification and drawing requirements after corrective action has been taken shall be reported to Ebasco. The supplier / contractor shall report these nonconformances to Ebasco by forwarding copies of the R2 nonconformance reports to tlue Quality Assurance Site Supervisor who shall provide a copy to the cognizant Vendor' Quality Assurance Repre-sentative. The supplier / contractor shall not initiate corrective action until receipt of written approval or other appropriate disposition from Ebasco. -
4.6.3 The Vendor'Qbality Assurance Representative shall maintain a log by purchase order and construction contract number of all noncon-formances and other discrepancies noted. This log enables the Vendor Quality Assurance Representative to maintain close control to assure that all outstanding items are cleared prior to release of the item for R2 shipment. Follow-up of nonconformances shall be as described in Sec-tion QA-III-6 of this manual.
4.7 The Vendor Quality Assurance Representative has the authority to reject work being performed in the supplier's/ contractor's shop which does not comply with the purchase order or construction contract requirements and to inform the supplier / contractor that unless the unsatisfactory condi-tion is corrected, the material or equipment will not be accepted by Ebasco.
/
(
\s -
W r-j
6 8094 A/2 75 PAGE 5 o, 6 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECT,ow ESASCO SERVICES
( incomponArco SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR SURVEILLANCE QA-III-5 4.0 VENDOR QUALITY ASSURANCE REPRESENTATION PROGRAM (cont'd) 4.8 The Vendor Quality Assurance Representative shall review all required documentation in the supplier's/ contractor's shop prior to release of the items for shipment. For those records requiring Engineering office review (i.e., Seismic reports, radiographic film, stress reports, special process procedures) the Vendor Quality Assurance Representative shall assure that the required reviews have been performed prior to releasing the items for shipment. The Vendor Quality AssuranceRepresentative shall use an appro-priate means of marking, stamping and/or initialing supplier / contractor documentation he has reviewed. These reviews shall be conducted in accord-ance with written procedures and instructions. The completed Quality Assur-ance Plan and Documentation Checklist shall be returned to the Project Quality Assurance Engineer for transmittal to the site.
4.9 Prior to shipment of items, the Vendor Quality Assurance Representative shall complete.and sign a " Release for Shipment" form indicating that he has determined that the material or equipment satisfies the purchase order or construction contract requirements, except in cases where a " Release for Ship-ment" form is not imposed by the specification. Equipment shall not be released for shipment by the Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives unless the above has been satisfied and that all required documentation is acceptable and nas 3
been transmitted to the site. A signed copy of the " Release for Shipment" form shall accompany shipment of the item where practicable; otherwise forwarded under separate cover. The requirement for a " Release for Shipment" form need not be imposed by the Project Quality Assurance Engineer or his designee from the R3 Quality Assurance Engineering Department where, in his judgement, the nature R3 and quantity of the material makes the requirement unnecessary or iupractical, eg., reinforcing steel, cadweld sleeves. Where the requirement for a " Release for Shipment" form has been imposed, it may be waived for such cases as defined I
above, if documented by memorandum from the Project Quality Assurance Engineer l to the Vendor Quality Assurance Department with copies to other affected parties.
l-l 4.10 The Vendor Quality Assurance Representative, although performing his assigned functions with respect to specific items of material or equipment, is to consider the operation of the supplier's/ contractor's overall Quality Assurance Program. Errors, nonconformance or any other discrepancies are to be evaluated to determine, if possible, whether or not there may be a program weakness. This program-oriented function is described in written procedures.
5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE SITE SUPERVISOR AND STAFF 5.1 The supplier / contractor shall be required to submit where applicable, (via purchace order or construction contract requirements) a detailed fabrication sequence showing required tests and inspections. Based upon this sequence the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor will establish " witness" points beyond which
^
work may not be performed by the supplier / contractor unless the operation is
<~'$
either witnessed by a representative of Ebasco, or the requirement for witness-lg y ing is waived by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor. Based on the purchase I v l
e sowan-n paar 6 or 6 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL S E CTION O EBASCO SERVICES QA-III-5 (Jj m coa no n A t t o SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR SURVEILLANCE 5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE SITE SUPERVISOR AND STAFF (cont'd) order or construction contract end supplicr's/ contractor's fabrication sequence, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the R3 Quality Assurance Engineering Department shall prepare a Quality Assurance R3 Plan for use by the Vendor Quality Assurance Representative. This plan is described in Paragraph 4.4 of this Section. Details as to how the plan is prepared, to uhom it is distributed, directions for implementation and sign-off are included in approved written departmental procedures.
5.2 The system by which supplier's/ contractor's procedures (required for Ebasco review by the purchase orderor. construction contract) are controlled is described in approved written procedures which require the following:
5.2.1 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the R3 Quality Assurance Engineering Department is responsible for obtaining R3 review and comments on each required procedure from the individual or group in Ebasco having expertise in the subject area.
5.2.2 Disposition of supplier's/ contractor's procedures may be " Reviewed without Comment," " Reviewed with Comment" or " Rejected". The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance R3
(-) Engineering Department is responsible for assuring that each reviewed procedure is clearly stamped and checked as to disposition, that the R3 reviewing party has signed and dated the appropriate space and that the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality R3 Assurance Engineering Department has initialed this space when the R3 review was performed by other than himself.
5.2.3 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the R3 Quality Assurance Engineering Department is responsible for summarizing R3 the results of Ebasco's review of supplier's/ contractor's procedures on a transmittal letter which accompanies the return of the procedures l to the supplier / contractor. Copies of the transmittal letter (and
- i procedures as applicable) are distributed in accordance with a standard l distribution list as prescribed by written departmental procedures.
5.3 The Quality Assuranco Site Supervisor shall process reports of non-conformances to field purchase orders and/or construction contracts in accord-ance with the requirements of Section QA-III-6 of this manual.
5.4 When decced necessary by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer, in-process system Quality Assurance audits of suppliers / contractors may be performed during the life of the purchase order /
construction contract. Such audits may be initiated as a result of supplier /
l contractor performance, significant changes in supplier's/ contractor's person-l~ nel responsible for implementing the Quality Assurance program, or new develop-l ments in code or regulatory Quality Assurance requirements. Where such audits (A
U) are deemed necessary, they shall be performed in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of this Manual. Such audits may be directed at a supplier's/ contractor's overall quality assurance program or may involve only a specific area of the program.
6109 6/2 78 PAGE 1 CF EBASCo SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTIoM INCORPORATED QA-III-5 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION
) { nEvisiew Addendum 1
$ SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR SURVEILLANCE oar r. 3/4/82
< ....,x.....
f .... ........
- 1. Paragraph 1.0: Last line. Add "STPEGS" after "... procured by..."
- 2. Paragraph 3.1: Pevise to read:
3.1 The Field Purchasing Agent shall distribute copies of all safety- 1 related Ebasco field purchase orders in accordance with Ebascp construction procedures. The Senior Resident Engineer, or his designee, shall distri-bute copies of all safety-related Ebasco Construction contracts. in accor-dance with Ebasco construction procedures.
- 3. Paragraph 3.2.1: Add "or services" after " item."
4 Paragraph 3.2.3: Revise to read:
3.2.3 Where surveillance is to be performed, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee shall:
- 5. Paragraph 3.2.3 (a): Revise to read: ,
(a) Prepare Quality Assurance Plan for items / activities to be observed.
v ,
- 6. Paragraph 3.3: Revise to read:
3.3 Where supplier / contractor surveillance is to be performed by Site Quality Assurance Representativ^es, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor, or his designee, assigns Quality Assurance Representativesto field pur-chase orders and construction contracts according to the particular area of expertise required (electrical, mechanical, etc.) and assures that each is adequately trained .and indoctrinated. Responsibilities of the .;. .
Quality Assurance Representative may include the following:
- l. 7. Paragraph 3.4: Delete the word " Vendor" in,the fourth and sixth lines.
- 8. Paragraph 4.1': Revise to read:
4.1 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee assures that all
~
Quality Assurance Representatives receive adequate training and indoctrina-tion. A . written approved program defines the manner in which such indoc-trinationand training is accomplished.
I t j '
[
Q./
i e
PAGE 2 er 4 siossn.75 EBA5co SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN INCOR PO R AT E D . . QA-III-5 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION ,,y,,,ouAddendum 1
- ^'" "4 #
g, ,,, , , ,, , , ,, SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR SURVEILLANCE
' 9. Paragraph 4.2: Revise to read:
4.2 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee, is reponsible for providing Quality Assurance Representatives with the instructions and procedures necessary for the perfonnance of their duties. In addition to instructions and procedures, certain specific .information is assembled for transmittal to, and use by, the Quality Assurance Representative with regard to each assigned purchase order or contract. This specific information in-
' c.ludes the following:
- 10. Paragraph 4.3: Delete all.
t
- 11. Paragraph 4.4: Revise to read:
4.4 After issuance of a purchase order or construction contract and prior to start of fabrication; the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee prepares the Quality Assurance Plan for use by the Quality Assurance Repre-sentative. The function of this plan is to indicate to the Quality Assurance O,
v Representative those operations, tests, records or other activities over which the Quality Assurance Representative is to provide surveillance.
- 12. Paragraph 4.4.1: Delete the word'" Vendor" in the second line.
- 13. Paragraph 4.4.2: Delete the word " Vendor" in the third and sixth lines.
- 14. Paragraph 4.0: Title. Del'ete the word " Vendor."
- 15. Paragraph 4.5:
- a. First line, delete the word " Vendor." ' .
- b. Fourth line shall say " Contacted" in lieu of " Contracted."
- c.. Delete last sentence, "The Project Distribution..."
s em v
e
sios4/2 7s PAse 3 er 4 EBASCO SERYlCEs HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTloH QA-III-5 INCORPORATED '
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT l ELECTRIC GEf(ERATItiG STATI0f4 nevision Addendum 1 o^TE 3/4 #
, ,,,,,,,,,,,, SUPPLIER /C0flTRACTOR SURVEILLAf1CE
- 16. Paragraph 4.6.1: Revise to read:
4.6.1 When a nonconfonnance is detected by an Ebasco Quality Assurance Representative in the supplier's/ contractor's shop system, he shall ini-tiate a lionconformance Report in accordance with Section QA-III-6 of this manual, detailing the description of the nonconformance on the form and obtaining a recommended disposition from the cognizant supplier /contrac-
. tor personnel. This report shall then be forwarded to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor for processing. -
17.' Paragraph 4.6.2: 1
- a. Second line delete word " rework."
- b. ~ Third line "the" in lieu of "Ebasco "
- c. Seventh line, delete word " Vendor."
- d. Eighth line, after Represent'a tive, the following:
"and the client or his' designee."
l l
l
- 18. Paragraph 4.6.3: First and third . lines, delete the word " Vendor."
- 19. Paragraph 4.7: First line delete word " Vendor."
l
- 20. Paragraph 4.0
Title:
Delete word " Vendor."
- 21. Paragraph 4.8: ,
- a. First, fifth and seventh lines delete word " Vendor." .
- b. Third line, end of first sentence add: "and/or installation."
- c. Tiiird line, second sentence add "Bechtel" before " Engineering" and delete word " office." ,
- d. Last sentence revise to read as follows:
"The completed Quality Assurance Plan and Documentation Checkl'ist shall w/ ; . be transmitted to the site." -
l'
. m
4 CF 4 stos4n-7s PAGE E8ASCO SERYlCES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioH INCORPORATED . . QA-III-5 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT h j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION newsionAddendum 1
/M M
....,s-,,,,yp..a.....u.
SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR SURVEILLANCE oAra 3/4/R9
- 22. ~ Paragraph 4.9: Revise to read:
4.9 P'rior to shipment / installation of items, the Quality Assurance Repre-sentative shall complete and sign a release for shipment: indicating that.he has determined that the material or equipment satisfies the purchase order or construction contract requirements, except in ~ cases where a'" Release" form is not-imposed by the specification. Equipment shall not be released by the 6 Quality Assurance Representatives.unless the above has been satisfied.:and that all required documentation is acceptable and has been transmitted to the site. A signed copy of the " Release" ~ fonn shall accompany shipment of the item where practicable; otherwise forwarded under separate cover. The requirement for a " Release" fonn need not be imposed by the Quality Assurance Site. Supervisor or his designee where, in his judgement, the nature and quantity of the material makes the requirement unnecessary or impractical, eg., reinforcing steel, cadweld sleeves. Where the requirement for a "Re-lease" form has been imposed, it may be waived ~ fur such cases as defined above, if documented by memorandum from the Quality Assurance Site Super .;
visor to' the Quality Assurance Representative with copies to other affected parties.
D 23. Paragraph 4.10: First line, delete the word " Vendor."
- 24. Paragraph 5.1: Eleventh line delete the word " Vendor."
- 25. Paragraph 5.4: Clarification:
The ".. .in-process.. . audits.. ." are considered supplemental to the periodic ones, required by Section QA-I-5 paragraph 6.2.
e eg e.
l
_,-....c , _ . _ . _ _ .I
4109 4 /2 75 PAGE I OF 5 R2
,, ES A$CO SERVICE 5 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
/\ INCORPOR ATED ij OA TTT-6 N ,
NONCONFORMANCES n g y, sio u 2 R2 oArc 3/4/81 R2 1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This section establishes the requirements for the identification, control and disposition of items or services found to be in nonconformance with the applicable requirements. Nonconformances at the construction site fall into two categories: (a) nonconformances to Ebasco site purchase order require-ments (b) nonconformances detected at the construction site. All activities described in this section shall be performed in accordance with written instructions and/or Procedures.
2.0 CONTROL AND REPORTING OF SUPPLIER NONCONFORMANCES 2.1 Section QA-I-5, requires suppliers to have and implement procedures which control nonconforming items and servicer to prevent their inadvertant use or installation. These procedures shall require as appropriate, identification, documentation, segregation, review and disposition of nonconformances.
2.2 All nonconformances to Ebasco construction site purchase order require-ments which render the quality of an item or service unacceptable shall be 9k reported to the Ebasco Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering Department by 'one of the following methods:
R2 R2 2.2.1 When a nonconformance is detected by an Ebasco Vendor Quality Assurance Representative, he shall initiate a Quality Assurance Engineer-ing Nonconformance Report by detaillag the description of the nonconfor-mance on the form and obtaining a recommended disposition from the appropriate Supplier personnel. The report shall then be forwarded to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality R2 Assurance Engineering Department for processing in accordance with R2 paragraph 5.0 below.
2.2.2 All nonconformances detected by the supplier that are dispositioned as repair, rework or use as is and will not conform to Ebasco specifica-tion and drawing requirements af ter corrective action has been taken shall be reported to Ebasco. The Supplier shall report these nonconfor-mances to Ebasco by forwarding copies of his nonconformance reports to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality R2 Assurance Engineering Department. The Supplier shall not initiate correc- R2 tive action until receipt of written approval or other appropriate disposition from Ebasco.
3.0 CONSTRUCTION SITE NONCONFORMANCES
_ 3.1 Nonconformances at the construction site may be detected by Ebasco
.s Quality Assurance Engineering, Construction or Design Engineering staff R2
[ } members. All nonconformances detected shall be reported to the Quality
' ,j Assurance Site Supervisor and the Quality Control Site Supervisor, or their R2 designees from the Quality Assurance Engineering Department. R2
sio 4an.ts paos 2 or_5__ R2 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
/ \ E5ASCO SERVICES
( eNcomponAtto NONCONFORMANCES QA-III-6 3.2 Quality Control procedures shall require that all nonconforming items shall be clearly marked or tagged as nonconforming and shall be segregated when possible.
3.3 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality '
Assurance Engineering Department shall document nonconformances detected by '
or reported to him by issuing a Quality Assurance Engineering Nonconformance '
Report. A determination of the seriousness of the nonconformance shall be made, '
including reportability per Company Procedure N-23. If a site contractor R2 detects a nonconformance, it shall be processed as per approved site contractor '
procedures. '
3.4 The Nonconformance Report shall then be sent to the cognizant department for completion of Part II - Recommended Disposition. If contractor services are involved, the recommended disposition shall be completed by the contractor. '
3.5 After processing of the Nonconformance Report, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering Department '
shall distribute copies of the reviewed and evaluated report in accordance with internal Quality Assurance procedures. '
3.6 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality R2 73
(
v) Assu.ance Engineering Department shall verify by audit or other appropriate means that the necessary corrective actions are taken.
R2 4.0 MATERIAL REVIEW BOARD 4.1 A Material Review Board shall be set up on site and shallconsist of the '
following individuals: Quality Program Site Manager, Senior Resident Engineer '
or his designee, ESSE Engineer, and Client Quality Assurance Engineer. All Nonconformance Reports with the disposition of " accept-as-is" or " repair" shall R2 I be evaluated by the Material Review Board. Final dispositicn shall be by '
unanimous decision. The Quality Program Site Manager will coordinate the '
activities of the Material Review Board's actions and act as chairman. '
5.0 REINSPECTION R2 5.1 For nonconformances to Ebasco Site Purchase order requirements, the R2 Vendor Quality Assurance Representative shall assure that reinspection is performed on all items and services repor'ed as nonconforming. Reinspection shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the governing Code (s) and in accordance with requirements at least as stringent as those by which the non-conformance was detected. He shall document the satisfactory correction or resolution of all nonconformances on a Quality Assurance Report. These forms shall provide sufficient detailed information for as-built records.
5.1.1 Nonconformances not corrected in accordance with the requirements R2 of the Nonconformance Report shall not be accepted by the Vendor Quality (o)
C/
Assurance Representative. Items or services shall not be accepted by the Vendor Quality Assurance Representative until such time as the appropriate corrective action has been accomplished.
stoo sA/2 75 PAGE I OF 5 R2 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION 3C CEs
( ',Yco,0 ,,o5'Ngo NONCONFORMANCES QA-III-6 V
5.2 For nonconformances detected at the construction site, the Quality Assur- R2 ance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering R2 Department shall assure that reinspection is performed on all items and R2 services reported as nonconforming. Reinspection shall be performed in accordance with the requirments of the governing Code (s) and in accordance with requirments at least as stringent as those by which the nonconformance was detected. He shall document the satisfactory correction or resolution of all nonconformances in accordance with quality assurance procedures.
This documentation shall provide sufficient detailed information for as-built records.
5.2.1 Nonconformances not corrected in accordance with the requirements R2 of the Nonconformance Report shall not be accepted by Site Quality Assurance. Items or services shall not be accepted by the Site Quality Assurance until such time as the appropriate corrective action has been accomplished.
6.0 REVIEW OF NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS '
t 6.1 Upon receipt or initiation of a nonconformance report, the Quality '
Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering n Department shall perform the following functions in accordance with QA '
procedures: '
V)
(
6.1.1 Log in the report 6.1.2 Review the report to determine the nature of the nonconformance 6.1.3 Where design integrity is involved, the report shall be routed to the Senior Resident Engineer who will review the report, and where '
necessary, contact cognizant Design Engineers to discuss the suitability of the reccommended disposition.
6.1.4 Transmi't the report to the cognizant engineer (s) for review
and evaluation R2 6.2 Cognizant engineer (s) shall review and evaluate the nonconformance report, decide on the suitability of the recommended disposition and enter '
details of the evaluation on the report. The report shall then be returned to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality '
Assurance Engineering Department.
6.3 Upon receipt of the reviewed and evaluated report the Quality Assurance '
Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering '
Department shall log in results of the review and distribute copies of the '
report to the Quality Control Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering Department and others as necessary in accordance with '
internal QA procedures.
(. h s
v)
61094A/2 75 PAGE OF 5 M HUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION bi ESASCO SERVICES mcompon A rso NONCONFORMANCES QA-III-6 6.4 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality R2 Assurance Engineering Department shall maintain on file all nonconformance '
reports gene ated in accordance with the requirements of this section. '
7.0 EVALUATION OF DISPOSITON '
f 7.1 Nonconformance Reports may be evaluated on site if there is a cognizant '
departmentally authorized member of the New York Engineering Department, '
Construction Engineering Department, or other~ authorized personnel as '
applicable. '
7.2 Nonconformances which require review by cognizant authorized members of R2 the Engineering Department who are not assigned to the construction site shall ,
be forwarded to the Home Office for processing in accordance with applicable ,
implementing procedures. ,
8.0 DEFICIENCY NOTICES 8.1 Deficiencies in the quality of items and services detected at the construction site which do not require an engineering evaluation or can ,
be corrected by approved standard repair procedures during the normal ,
course of construction shall be recorded in a Deficiency Notice. Copies
{N ,
g V} of all Deficiency Notices shall be transmitted to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor who will initiate Nonconformance Reports based on informa-tion given in the Deficiency Notices when he determines that this action is necessary. In this case, the Deficiency Notice becomes a part of the Non- ,g conformance Report and only the Nonconformance Report is required to be ,
resolved. ,
8.2 Items discovered to be out-of-tolerance or not to specification at routine checkpoints of an inspection process shall not be considered as a ,
nonconformance provided: ,
- a. the condition is corrected prior to acceptance of the work *
- b. the work does not proceed beyond the checkpoint until the correction is made ,
R2
- c. the out-of-tolerance condition does not reflect on work previously ,
accepted ,
- d. no violation of Procedure or Code is evident ,
Damage which would affect the integrity of an item shall be classified as a nonconformance and processed accordingly. ,
l' 8.3 The processing of Deficiency Notices shall be detailed in approved Site p Quality Control Procedures. ,
k v
l
s too4 a /a.7s pros 5 op 5 R2 NUCLEAR QUALITY A55URANCE PROCRAM MANUAL SECTeoM ESASCO SERVICES
( 8NcomponArco NONCONFORMANCES QA-III-6 9.0 TREND ANALYSES OF NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS ,
i 9.1 Copies of nonconformance reports from the sources rentioned above shall R2 be submitted to the Quality Assurance Engineering Internal Audit Supervisor ,
or the Ebasco Quality Program Coordinator. The Quality Assurance Engineering ,
Interal Audit Supervisor subsequently receives all reports and makes an ,
analysis of the available Quality Assurance data with respect to Quality ,
trends in accordance with Quality Assurance Engineering Procedures QA-D.3 and ,
formally reports his findings to the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer and the ,
Chairman of the Quality Progra:; Committee. ,
9.2 The trend analysis and distribution of subsequent reports shall be made ,
in accordance with the requirements of Quality Assurance Engineering ,
Procedure QA-D.3. ,
R2 10.0 RECORDS 10.0 Nonconformance Reports and Quality Assurance Reports shall be main-tained in accordance with Section QA-I-6. ,
U
)-
3 k
~
4 sios4/27s Pane 1 or i EBASCO SERYlCES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURAhCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioM
! INCORPORATED QA-III-6 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION
{ . Revision Addendum 1 d [. Mb
...... _ ..y ....... ......_..
NONCONF0.RMANCES o4re 3/4/R2 1.. Paragraph 2.2.1: Revise to read:
2.2.1 When a nonconformance is detected by an Ebasco Qu'ality Assurance Representative, he shall initiate a Nonconformance Report by detailing the description of the nonconfomance on the form and obtaining a recommended disposition from the appropriate Supplier personnel. The report shall then be forwarded to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from
, the Quality Assurance Engineering Department for processing in accordance with paragraph 5.0 below.
- 2. Paragraph 2.2.2: Revise to read:
i .
2.2.2 All nonconformances detected by the supplier tha't are dispositioned as repair or use as is and will not conform to the specification and draw-ing requirements after corrective action has bee'n taken shall be reported to Ebasco Site Quality Assurance. The Supplier shall report these non-confomances to. Ebasco by forwarding copies of his nonconfonnance reports to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee. The Supplier shall not initiate correctiv' e action until he receives from Ebasco Site Quality
) Assurance a written disposition approved by Bechtel Engineering.
s v'
- 3. Paragraph 3.1: Revise to read:
3.1 Noncoriformances at-the cons'truction site may be detected by Ebasco Site Quality. Control, Site Quality Assurance, or Construction. All non-conformnces detected shall .be reported to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee. -
- 4. Paragraph 3.3: Revise to read:
3.3 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor, th.e Quality Control Site Supervisor, or their designees shall docunjent nonconformances detected by or reported to them by issuing a Quality Assurance Engineering Non- ,
conformance Report. When Ebasco is so directed by the Client or his de signe.e, nonconformances shall be documented on the Bechtel Nonconformance -
p }'
Report Form. A preliminary assessment of the severity of the noncon-formance shall be made per N-23. The final responsiblity for evalua-tion of all nonconformances for possible reportability, rest with i Bechtel.
E v ,
t .
D, 4
_- . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J
sios4/2 7s Page 2 er a ESA5CO SERVICE 5 NUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN INCORPOR AT ED QA-III-6 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT (m') { ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION newsionAddendum 1
[
< / A / ...... .
.. u ...u ,, 9 ....c. NONCONFORMANCES orre 3/4/R2
- 5. Paragraph 3.4: Revise to read:
3.4 The Nonconformance Report shall be transmitted to the cognizant Ebasco department for preparation of the recommended disposition. If contractor services are involved, the recommended disposition shall be prepared by the contractor.
- 6. Paragraph 3.5: Revise to read:
3.5 After the recommended disposition has been documented, the Non-conformance Report shall be transmitted to Bechtel for final disposition.
When the final dispositioned Nonconformance Report is received from Bechtel, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee shall distribute copies of the reviewed and evaluated report in accordance with internal Site Quality Assurance procedures.
p) i v
- 7. Paragraph 4.0: Delete in its entirety.
- 8. Paragraph 5.1: Revise to read:
5.1 For nonconformances to Ebasco Site purchase order requirements, the '
Quality Assurance Representative shall assure that reinspection is perform-ed on all items and services reported as nonconforming. Reinspection shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the governing Code (s) and in accordance with requirements at least as stringent as those by which the non-conformance was detected. He shall document the satisfactory cor-rection or resolution of all nonconformances on the dispositioned noncon-fomance report. This documentation shall provide sufficient detailed in-formation for as-built records.
- 9. Paragraph 5.1.1: Revise to read: ,
5.1 1 Nonconformances not corrected in accordance with the Bechtel En-gineering disposition to the Nonconformance Report shall not be accepted by the Quality Assurance Representative. Items or services shall not be ac-cepted by the Quality Assurance Representative until such time as the appro-priate corrective action ha:s been accomplished.
pi
\
u i ,
t
sio u n.2s PAse 3y 4 EBASCo SERVICES HUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAMMANUAL SECTioN INCORPORATED QA-III-6 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT p) t o
ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION nevisio,, Addendum 1 V
- MM NONCONFORMANCES one 3/4/82
- 10. Paragraph 5.2: Revise to read:
~
5.2 For nonconformances detected at the construction site, the Quality Con-trol Site Supervisor or his designee shall assure that reinspection is per-fonned on all items and services reported as nonconforming. Reinspection shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the governing Code (s) and in accordance with requirements at least as stringent as those by which the nonconformance was detected. He shall document the satisfactory correc-tion or resolution of all nonconformances on the dispositioned Nonconformance Report., This documentation shall provide sufficient detailed information for as-built records.
- 11. Paragraph 5.2.1: Revise to read:
5.2.1 Nonconfonnances not corrected in accordance with the Bechtel dispo-sition t Control.,oItems the Nonconfonnance or services shall Report shall not be not be accepted accapted by the by Site Site Quality Quality Con-p' trol until such time as the appropriate corrective action has been accom-plished.
>J
- 12. Paragraph 6.1.3: Revise to read:
6.1.3 Where design integrity is involved, the report shall be routed to the Senior Resident Engineer who will review the report, and where neces-sary, contact Bechtel Engineering to discuss the suitability of the recom-
. mended disposition.
r l 13. Paragraph 6.1.4: Revise to read:
l 6.1.4 Transmit the report to Bechtel Engineering for final disposition.
- 14. Paragraph 6.2: Delete in its entirety.
I v
e
I stoo s/2-7s PArc 4 cr 4 EBA5CO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUAllTY ASSURANCC PROGRAM MANUAL SECTIoM
~
INCORPORATED QA-III-6 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT fx) l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION misio, Addendum 1 NONCONFORMANCES ^" ##
- .........,y,...............
- 15. Paragraph 6.3: Revise to read:
6.3 Upon receipt of the final dispositioned Nonconformance Report from Bechtel, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee shall log in results of the Bechtel review and distribute copies of the report as necessary in accordance with internal QC procedures.
- 16. Paragraph 6.4: Revise to read:
6.4 The Quality Assurance Site Super"isor or his designee shall maintain on file all nonconformance reports generated in accordance with the require-ments of this section.
- 17. Paragraph 7.0: (Including Paragraph 7.1 and 7.2) Delete in its entirety.
- 18. Paragraph 8.1: Revise to read:
f% 8.1 Deficiencies in the quality. of items and services detected at the con-
\,
V
) struction site which can be corrected by reworking or by standard repair procedures (approved by Bechtel Engineering) during the normal course of construction shall be recorded in a Deficiency Notice. Copies of all De-ficiency Notices shall be transmitted to the Quality Control Site Super-
~
visor or his designee who will . initiate Nonconformance Reports based on information given in the Deficiency Notices when he determines that this action is necessary. In this case, the Deficiency Notice becomes a part of the Nonconformance Report and only the Nonconformance Report is required to be resolved.
- 19. Paragraph 9.2: Revise to read:
9.2 The trend analysis and distribution of subsequent reports shall be made in accordance with the requirements.of Quality Assurance Engineering Procedure QA-D.3. Copies of trend analysis reports shall be forwarded to the Client or his designee.
D) t v {
sios4n n enor 1 or 4 EBASCO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
/m\ INCOReoRATEo OA-TTT-7 t l I b c . . . . - . . . .. . . . M. . . . . a c . "" " 2 R2 g CORRECTIVE ACTION I. <....... .. ,f ,....... ........
care 3/4/a1 R2 v
'l . 0 SCOPE This section establishes the requirements for the identification, analysis and implementation of corrective action for safety related items and services. The section applies to activities performed at the construction site.
2.0 CENERAL 2.1 Corrective action shall be required for identified and documented nonconformance associated with safety-related items and services.
2.2 The need for corrective action may be identified from the following sources:
2.2.1 Inspection activities performed by Site Quality Control R2 2.2.2 Site Quality Control document reviews R2 2.2.3 Quality Assurance audits performed by Quality Assurance
/'~'}
\ /
Engineering in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of this manual 2.2.4 Audits of Ebasco performed by the Client or regulatory bodies 2.2.5 Nonconformances detected at a supplier's facility and at the construction site as described in Section QA-III-6 of this Manual 2.2.6 Audits of Quality Assurance Engineering performed by the Consulting Quality Assurance Engineer j 2.3 Determination and review of corrective action items shall be made as early as possible in order to preclude the possible repetitlen of deficiencies l 2.4 During the review of all corrective action items, consideration shall be given to the training of personnel if it is determined that this was a cause
- of the deficiency.
l
! 2.5 Dissemination of corrective action information to responsible individuals shall be performed in a minimum length of time.
'6. At f discretion of the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee R2 from the quality Assurance Engineering Department, for corrective action items R2 identified per paragraph 3.2 of this section, a corrective action document may be issued. This document shall be used when problems are not isolated cases
, and when they are of sufficient magnitude to warrant a documented supervisory review per written.QA procedures. This document goes beyond the standard audit action .esponse required for all audits.
{'~'}
\_/
E S1094A/2 75 PAGE or NUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTion
[h ESASCO SERVICES 4
() mconsonargo CORRECTIVE ACTION QA-III-7 2.7 The maximum length of time for corrective action response shall be 20 working days from the receipt of notice of deficiency or nonconformance.
The maximum implementation time shall be 20 working days from the acceptance of corrective action response, unless otherwise approved by the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineer- R2 ing Department. R2 2.8 It shall be the responsibility of the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering Department to assure R2 that all required corrective action is implemented in a timely manner.
2.9 Need for reporting non-conformances at the site to the U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall be determined in accordance with Company Procedure N-23. Where a nonconformance is judged to be reportable or poten- R2
- tially reportable to the U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission in accordance with j 10 CFR 50.55e, the provisions of Company Procedure N-23 shall be followed R2 regarding notification and performance of corrective action.
3.0 DETERMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION METHODS 3.1 Nonconformance Reports Generated at the Construction Site I ) 3.1.1 Site Quality Control shall perform. direct inspection of activities R2 kJ at the construction site as required by Section QA-III-ll of this Manual.
3.1.2 Nonconformances noted during these inspection activities shall be documented on a nonconformance report in accordance with Section QA-III-6 of this Manual. Site Quality Control shall verify that the corrective action which has been stipulated on the completed form is implemented.
Site Quality Control shall maintain a log of all required corrective action and shall review this periodically to assure the resolution of i deficiencies and implementation of required corrective action.
l l 3.2 Site Quality Assurance Audits 3.2.1 Site Quality Assurance shall perform internal and external R2 audits of activities performed at the construction site as required by Section QA-III-9 of this Manual. Site Quality Assurance shall also perform follow-up action as described in Section QA-III-9 to assure that corrective action, if required, has been accomplished. If disagreement about the type or effectiveness of corrective action exists, the problem shall be reviewed by successively higher levels of management until satisfactory resolution is obtained.
3.2.2 Audits of potential Ebasco suppliers shall be performed as described in Sections QA-III-9 and QA-I-5 of this Manual. If any t
l l
Sl094 A/2 75 3 4 PAGE OF NUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION CN (y) EBASCO SERVICES incomponareo CORRECTIVE ACTION QA-III-7 aspect of a supplicr's quality assurance program does not meet the Ebasco requirements and the supplier is being considered for award, he must implement corrective action to rectify the problem areas disclosed by the Ebasco evaluation. Supplier corrective actict; items shall be administered in accordance with Section QA-I-5.
3.3 Supplier Nonconformance 3.3.1 Nonconformance reports shall be issued at a supplier's facility as required in Section QA-III-6 of this Manual. Section QA-III-6 re-quires the indication of a nonconformance report for nonconformances detected at the supplier's facility. These reports shall be submitted to Ebasco and processed in accordance with Section QA-III-6 of this Manual . Section QA-III-6 also assures that reinspection of nonconform-ing safety-related items and services is performed and that deficien-cies have been resolved and appropriate corrective action has been taken prior to acceptance of these items or services by Ebasco.
3.3.2 During the reviews of nonconformance reports, a determination of the adequacy and effectiveness of inspection and test procedures, process
,- s controls and sampling plan shall be made. If it is ascertained that an
/ ) improvement in inspection techniques and procedures or an increased (s_,/ sampling rate will improve quality, the vendor or Site Quality Control, as appropriate, shall be notified of the corrective action required to upgrade the system.
3.4 Client or Regulatory Agency Audits 3.4.1 Audits of construction site activities may be performed by the client and/or appropriate regulatory agencies. If corrective action is required as a result of one of these audits, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering R2 Department shall be responsible for obtaining a response from the cogni- R2 zant individual (s) for submittal to the auditing body.
4.0 FINAL VERIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION IMPLEMENTATION In addition to his other duties, overall responsibility for verification of the implementation of required corrective action rests with the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering Department. He R2 shall be responsible for performing this verification for all items indicated in paragraph 3.0 above, and shall assure that the corrective action is implemented and in a timely manner. In the event that there is a disagreement between those indivi-duals who detect a deficiency and those responsible for the function found to be deficient, the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor shall contact successively higher levels of management as necessary until resolution is obtained.
O s_-]
Sl094A/2 75 pagg 4 o, 4 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ESA5CO SERVICE 5 inconponareo CORRECTIVE ACTION QA-III-7 5.0 DETERMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF QUALITY TRENDS In order to prevent the recurrence of quality problems, Ebasco has developed '
a method, specified in QA Proceuures, for the determination and analysis of quality '
trends. Copies of audit reports and nonconformance reports (or other appropriate '
documentation) mentioned above shall be submitted to the Quality Assurance Engin-eering Internal Audit Supervisor or the Ebasco Quality Program Coordinator. The R2 Quality Assurance Engineering Internal Audit Supervisor subsequently receives all '
reports and makes an analysis of the available Quality Assurance data with respect to quality trends. The trend analysis and distribution of subsequent reports shall '
be made in accordance with Quality Assurance Engineering Procedure QA-D.3.
(O v'
4 J
. ~.
~
6109 6/2-75 PAGE I CF EBASCO SERYlCES ' NUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioH INCORPORATED .
QA-III-7 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION -
Revisiew Addendum 1
[< [M[M.uoso..
CORRECTIVE ACTION oarE 3/4/82
- 1. Paragraph 2.9: Revise to read:
A preliminary assestme'nt of the severity of t'he nonconformance shall be made per N-23. The final responsibility for evaluation of all nonconformances for possible reportability rest with Bechtel. " Reporting of nonconformances in accordance . ith 10CFR50.55E and its subsequent evaluation will:be the respon-sibility of the client or his designee, Bechtel Engineering."
- 2. >~aragraph 3.4: Revise Title to read:
Client or His Designee, or Regulatory Agency Audits
- 3. Paragraph 3.4.1: First paragraph, second line. Add the :following after " Client."
"...or his designee..."
~ C
(
==
- e.
e4 Gm
.** g 9
4 e
v Ik 1 ' ,,
I
6109 4/2 75 PAGE I OF 3 EBA5CO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION INcORPoR ATED QA-III-8 O -
(s] l ...b...M.
g
. =. . -/..
A s... .. ~
CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES nevis,oy 1 g -dg@f oaTE 2/29/80 at t=ss=ts.
cas t r U.u r, a sg.=c t v
'1. 0 SCOPE 1.1 This section of the Quality Assurance Manual establishes the requirements for the control of special processes at the Construction Site. Included here-in are provisions for the establishment of critical process parameters, quali-fication of the processes, and training and qualification of personnel who perform the functions covered by this section.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 For site purchased items, suppliers shall be responsible for submitting procedures which control special processes to Ebasco in accordance with pur-chase order or contract requirements.
2.2 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality R1 Assurance Engineering Department shall be responsible for the coordination of R1 all review functions associated with supplier specie.1 process procedures submitted on site purchase orders.
[~') 2.3 The Quality Assurance Engineering Department shall be responsible for the R1
( ),,
following:
2.3.1 Development of guidelines for supplier and Site Quality R1 Control procedures. R1 2.3.2 Providing technical assistance for procedure review and development as required by Site Quality Assurance and Site Quality R1 Control.
2.4 The Materials Applications Department shall be responsible for the following:
2.4.1 Development of welding procedures and assisting in their qualifications.
2.4.2 Providing technical assistance for procedure review and devel-opment as required by Site Quality Assurance and Site Quality Control. R1 2.5 All Construction Contractors shall be responsible for writing and implementing procedures for nondestructive examination, and for qualifying personnel to perform these operations.
2.6 All Construction Contractors shall be responsible for writing and
- implementing welding and heat treatment procedures, and for qualifying
- ('"'% personnel who will be performing these functions.
\ v/
6106 6A/2 75 PAGE 9 OF 3 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBA5CO SERVICE 5
'N *C "" "'TED CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES QA-III-8 3.0 METHODS FOR CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 3.1 Site Purchase Orders and Contracts 3.1.1 The Ebasco purchase orders for safety related-items shall in-dicate which special process procedures are required for submittal to Ebasco for review. The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his de- R1 signee from the Quality Assurance Engineering Department shall re- R1 view all purchase orders for these items to assure the inclusion of requirements for submittal of these procedures as indicated in See-tion QA-I-4 of this Manual.
3.1.2 Procedures which describe the methods used in performing special processes shall be sent to Site Quality Assurance. The R1 Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality R1 Assurance Engineering Department shall review each procedure to R1 determine its application and then route it to the appropriate cognizant individual for a detailed review. This review may be per-formed either at the site or by Engineering office personnel depend-ing on the type of procedure submitted.
'N 3.1.3 The reviewing individuals shall assure that each procedure f(,) is in compliance with appropriate codes and standards, and shall indicate any comments directly on the procedure or on separate sheet (s) '
attached thereto. He shall then return the procedure to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance '
Engineering Department for final processing. The details of the R1 methods' involved are described in Quality Assurance Engineering pro-cedures.
3.1.4 In the supplier's shops, the Ebasco Vendor Quality Assurance R1 i Representatives shall verify that only procedures which have been reviewed without comment by Ebasco are used in the processing of the safety-related items and services purchased by Ebasco. In addition, the Vendor Quality Assurance Representatives shall also verify that R1 only qualified personnel are using these procedures. No item shall
- be considered acceptable if Ebasco has not reviewed the procedures as established by project requirements or if an unqualified indivi- R1 is using a procedure for which a qualification is necessary.
3.2 Site Special Procedures 3.2.1 Construction Contractors shall develop procedures which will be used in the performance of nondestrutive examination at the construc-tion site. These procedures shall conform to the guidelines estab-
- lished by the Quality Assurance Engineering Department, and shall re-flect the requirements of all applicable codes and standards, Con-
{s formance to these procedures and qualification requirements shall be verified through audits performed by Site Quality Assurance Represen- R1 tatives.
61094 A/2 75 Pace 3 or 3 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBA5CO SERVICES INCoRPoRATEo CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES QA-III-8 3.2.2 All Welding and heat treating procedures used at the construc-tion site shall be reviewed by the Materials Applications Department.
Ebasco welding procedures shall be qualified either at the Materials Engineering Laboratory or at the construction site by the Construction Department and assistance in the qualification shall be provided by the Materials Applications Department as required. Construction Con-tractors shall be responsible for writing their own welding and heat treatment procedures. These shall be implemented only after review by Ebasco and resolution of any comments. All welders installing safety-related items at the site shall be qualified in accordance with appro-priate codes and standards. Verification of conformance to procedure and operator qualification requirements shall be provided by inspec-tion functions of Site Quality Control and/or audits performed by Site RR.
Quality Assurance. RL m
l l
l l
=
6109 4 /2 75 PACE 1 CF EBASCO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL. SECTioH INCORPORATED QA-III-8 (qj ,
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION nEvision Addendum 1 CONTF0L 0F SPECIAL PROCESSES oATE 3/4/82
<..........,y.............
- 1. Paragraph 2.5: Revise first line to read:
^
"Ebasco Construction and all Construction Contractors shall..."
- 2. Paragraph 2.6: Revise first line to read:
"Ebasco Construction and all Construction Contractors shall..."
- 3. Add Paragraph 2.7 to read:
2.7 Ebasco Construction and all Construction Contractors shall be respon-sible for writing and implementing procedures for such other activities classified as special processes (i.e., cadwelding, chemical cleaning, flush-ing) and for qualifying personnel who will be performing these functions.
- 4. Paragraph 3.1.1: Last line revise to reference Section to be Section QA-III-4.
(
\~ /
%/
- 5. Paragraph 3.1.2: Delete last sentence. "
This review may be. . . "
- 6. Paragraph 3.1.4: First and fifth line delete the word " Vendor."
- 7. Paragraph 3.2.1: Commence the paragraph as follows:
"Ebasco Construction and Construction Contractors shall..."
- 8. Add Paragraph 3.2.3 to read:
l l
3.2.3 All other special process procedures shall be reviewed and accepted i by the Ebasco Quality Assurance Site Supervisor. All comments resulting I from such reviews shall be resolved prior to implementation.
l
- 9. Add Paragraph 4.0 to read:
4.0 Ebasco Special Process Procedures 4.1 Where Ebasco is acting as the constructor, all EMsco special process' procedures shall be reviewed and accepted, prior 'o implementation hs\s) in accordance with paragraphs 3.1.2 and 3.1.3, ano paragraph 3.6 of Section QA-III-1.
y - --_ _
sios4n.7s pace 1 or 5 EBA$CO $ERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION mcompoR ATED v' i
_ _c.. p roo.,
-~
. 7 .4. ...- co - " " V' 0 '
g QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS g o,,, 2/29/80
< ...... - ,,,..... y ,........
1.0 SCOPE 1.1 Quality-related activities at the construction site are indepen--
dently audited by the Site Quality Assurance group of the Ebasco Quality R1 Assurance Engineering Department. This section establishes the require-ments and guidelines for the preparation, performance, reporting and follow-up of quality assurance audits, both internal and external, as performed by Site Quality Assurance. R1 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The Ebasco Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering Department shall assign qualified Site R1 Quality Assurance Representatives to perform audits covered by this section .
2.2 Qualification of auditors will be based on the requirements of para-graphs 5.2 and 5.3 herein and Quality Assurance Engineering procedures. R1 l
fi) g 3.0 INTERNAL AUDITS J
3.1 The Site Quality Assurance Representativer shall audit the various R1 quality-related activities performed by Ebasco departments on the con-struction site.
3.2 These audits shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of this section and Quality Assurance Engineering procedures. R1 l
3.3 Qualifications and certification records for site quality control i
personnel shall be audited in accordance with Section QA-III-1, Para-graph 3.7 of this Manual.
l 3.4 The Site Quality Assurance Representatives shall have the authority R1 l
to reject items, services or work for nonconformance to the specification, I
drawing or quality control requirements.
4.0 EXTERNAL AUDITS 4.1 The Site Quality Assurance Representatives shall audit the various R1 quality-related activities performed by site construction forces.
4.2 These audits shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of this section and Quality Assurance Engineering procedures. R1
( 4.3 Prior to the award of a contract, required Audits of prospective suppliers or suppliers of site purchased safety-related items and services (v
shall be performed by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee (s) R1 in accordance with the requirements of Quality Assurance Engineering pro- R1 cedures, and Section QA-I-5 and QA-II-9, paragraphs 2.0 and 3.4.
sios4a/a 7s pace 2 o, 5 NUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN O ESA5CO SERVICES f
INCORPOR ATEo QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS QA-III-9 At the discretion of the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer, audits of suppliers or prospective suppliers may be performed by Quality Assurance Engineering personnel assigned to other Ebasco Engineering Offices.
4.4 Audits of prospective suppliers may not be necessary if the suppliers have been previously audited and found satisfactory in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-I-5.
4.4.1 When prospective site contractors of items or services are audited by Quality Assurance Engineering personnel, the Quality Con- El trol Site Supervisor or his designee shall attend and participate in R1 the evaluation as described in Ebasco Site Quality Control Procedures.
4.4.2 Reports of audits covered by paragraph 4.4.1 above shall be written by Quality Assurance Engineering with input, when available, from Ebasco Quality Control.
5.0 PENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL ON-SITE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AUDITS 5.1 Audit Personnel rr 5.1.1 Shall be independent of direct responsibility for perfor-( )
\m, / mance of the activity being audited.
5.1.2 Shall be qualified to perform quality assurance audits based on experience and training.
5.2 Training and Orientation 5.2.1 Audit personnel shall have experience and training or orienta-l tion to assure their competence for performing audits. The competence of personnel to perform audits shall be developed by one or more of the following methods:
(a) Providing personnel with working knowledge of appro-priate regulatory documents, practices, codes and standards.
(b) Training or orientation in general and specialized methods of planning and performing audits.
(c) On-the-job training under direct supervision of an ex-perienced qualified auditor.
5.2.2 The requirements for training and orientation of auditors shall be in accordance with Quality Assurance Engineering procedures. R1 v) l -. - - - - _ - . . - _ _ .
41094 A/2 75 PAJE 3 OF 5 I HUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
\
ESA5CO $ERVICES
) INCORPoRATEo QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS QA-III-9
.V 5.3 Proficiency of Auditors 5.3.1 Auditors performing audits shall maintain their proficiency through one or more of the following methods:
(a) Regular, active participation in the audit process.
(b) Review and study of codes, standards and procedures, related to Quality Assurance Programs and program auditing.
5.3.2 The Chief Quality Assurance Engineer or his designee shall periodically evaluate auditors in accordance with Quality Assurance R1 Engineering procedures to assure that the auditors are maintaining their 11 proficiency.
5.4 Audit Planning 5.4.1 Preparation for audits shall include the development of a written audit plan of standard format which includes:
(a) Audit scope (b) Approved written procedures and/or checklists which assure that the organization will be audited to the extent necessary. These procedures and/or checklists shall prc-vide for verifying corrective action of nonconformance identified in previous audits. Audits procedures and/or checklists may developed as part of a general audit pro-gram and need not be unique for each audit.
(c) Activities to be audited 5.5 Audit Performance 5.5.1 Checklists and/or written procedures of standard format shall be used to conduct the audit.
5.6 Reporting of Audit Results 5.6.1 An audit report shall be compiled and shall be signed by those performing the audit. The audit report shall provide:
i (a) Description of the audit scope (b) Identification of the auditors (c) Persons contacted (D)
V (d) A summary of the audit results including an evaluation ,
/
l statement regarding the effectiveness of the Quality l
Assurance Program elements which were audited.
L
, ./
eice44/s.7s PAar 4 o, 5 NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION h EBASCO SERVICES mcoanoa ATeo QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS QA-III-9 (e) Detailed description of nonconformances and causes thereof where possible.
(f) Recommendations for correcting nonconformances or im-proving the Quality Assurance Program, if possible.
5.6.2 The audit report shall be issued within 10 working days.
5.7 Audit Follow-Up 5.7.1 The audited department or individual shall be required to respond to the audit report in writing within 20 working days af ter receipt of the audit. The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his .R1 designee from the Quality Assurance Engineering Department shall have R1 l the authority to require shorter response times when necessary. The shorter response time shall be stated on the specific audit reports to which they pertain. As necessary, subsequent responses may be re-quired to verify completion e' ctive action.
5.7.2 Follow-up action shall os performed by ,ita S Quality Assurance R1 fs Representatiics to:
(v j (a) Assure that the written reply to the audit report is received.
bI (b) Assure that corrective action is identified and scheduled
, for each nonconformance.
(c) Confirm that nonconformances are r solved and corrective action when necessary, is accomplished.
,/ 5.7.3 Follow-up action may be accomplished through written communica-
' tion, reaudit, or other appropriate means.
./
6.0 TREND ANALYSIS OF AUDIT REPORTS 6.1 Copies of all audit reports shall be submitted to the Quality Assur-ance Engineering Internal Audit Supervisor or the Ebasco Quality Program R1 Coordinator. The ' Quality Assurance Engineering Internal Audit Supervisor subsequently receives all reports and makes an analysis of the available quality assurance data with respect to quality trends and formally reports.
his findings to the Chief Quality Assurance Enginee'r and the Chairman of the Quality Program Committee.
The trend analyses and distribution of subsequent reports shall be made in accordance with the requirements of Quality Assurance Engineering Proce-dure OA-D.3. R1 k -
a
~
_ . . __. _. _ _ _ _ __ _ . _. ___ _ __ - . . _ . = - _ _ _ _ _. . ._
s too4an.n ,,og 5 or 5 HUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
- ESA5CO SERVICES iNeoaponAtto QUALIIT ASSURANCE AUDITS QA-III-9 7.0 AUDIT RECORDS l
7.1 Records generated during audit preparation, performance or follow-up
- shall be retained for all audits in accordance with the applicable require-l ments of Section QA-I-6 and written Quality Assurance Engineering procedures. R1 Such records shall include
(a) Audit plans and checklists (b) Audit reports (c) Written replies to audit reports (d) Status of required corrective action
, (e) Other documents which support audit findings and corrective
! action as appropriate.
7.2 Records of training and experience of auditors shall be maintained for all personnel who are performing audits or who have previously performed audits. These shall be retained for the same period of time as required for the audit reports with which the auditors are associated.
I l
I l
l l
\
'J l
l l
- .__- . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ ._. , , _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,,_,__,,y_,_ _ _ _ _ . , _ , _ ., _ _ _ _ . . _ , ,, _ _ _ . . . _ . _ _ , , , . , . . . _ , , , _ , ,.
Puc 1 cr I sios4 n as EBASCO SERVICES ~ NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTloH INCOMPORATED
. QA-III-9 p l ELEC GEli R T S ATI0f4 . nevisio,, Addendum 1 o^TE 3/4/82 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS
,. ........m..,.f...............
- 1. Paragraph 4.3 First sentence: Delete reference to Section QA-II-9.
- 2. Paragraph 5.3.2: Revise to read:
The Chief Quality Assurance Engineer or his designee shall evaluation auditors in accordance with Quality Assurance Engineering Procedure QA-G.3 to assure that the auditors are maintaining their proficiency.
- 3. Add Paragraph 5.7.4 to read: '
5.7.4 Supplemental audits should be conducted when:
a) Significant changes in the Quality Assurance'. Program are made.
b) There is evidence- of significant noncompliance to the Quality As-surance Program.
c) An assessment of the effectiveness 'of the Quality Assurance Pro-gram is requested.
d) It is necessary to verify implementation of corrective action.
e) It is considered ne'cessary1by the Quality Program Site Manager.
4~. Paragraph 7.2: Add the following sentence to read:
" Maintenance and retention shall b'e as per, Quality Assurance Engineering Procedure QA-G.3."
Q...
stoo4n n Pact I or 2 ESASCO SERVICES MUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
/' mconeon s re QA-III-10 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF ITEMS
.g{L T A_
g g 1 , ... G.... ~c. a E vision 1 l o,,, 2/29/80
. ..... ...... .....f y. ........
V 1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This section establishes the requirements for the identification and control of safety-related items at the construction site.
1.2 The activities described herein shall be performed in accordance with written instructions, procedures and/or drawings that have been developed and accepted in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-III-l of this Manual.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Site Quality Control shall be responsible to perform the following func- R1 tions in accord.ance with written procedures:
(a) Assure that items received are properly identified and are accompanied by appropriate documentation as required by the purchase order or construction contract.
[ N.
y 1 (b) Assure that all items shall be physically identified in accor-dance with paragraph 3.0 below and appropriate written procedures.
(c) Assure that identification of items shall be transferred to in-spection and test records and as-built documents in a manner sufficient to provide the required traceability.
(d) Assure that items are handled and stored in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-III-14 so as to maintain identification.
2.2 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality R1 Assurance Engineering Department shall be responsible for the performance R1 of reviews and audits in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of this Manual to assure compliance to the requirements of this Section.
3.0 GENERAL 3.1 Documented Quality Control procedures require that items shall be physically identified by any of the following means:
(a) Stenciled or etched markings.
(b) Strip Markings.
~
(c) Imprinted tape.
[O (d) Tagging.
paa, 2 o, 2 s t oe4 a/ so.7.
MUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN EBASCO SERVICES QA-III-10
! incommonatro. IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF ITEMS 1
)
i (e) Color coding.
i l (f) Records traceable to the items.
(g) Procedural control.
(h) Other appropriate means in accordance with approved Site Quality
', Control Procedures, 3.2 When it is impractical to physically identify small items, these may be identified as to heat numbers, batch, lot or specification by applying markings to bags, bins, tanks, or other suitable containers.
3.3 Identification of items shall provide the required degree traceability to pertinent documents.
3.4 All markings shall be clear, unambiguous and indelible and shall not affect the function of the item when applied.
3.5 When an item is subdivided, markings shall be transferred to each part
- of the item.
3.6 Markings shall not be obliterated or hidden by surface treatment or coatings unless other means of identification is substituted.
! 4.0 RECORDS
- 4.1 Records pertaining to this section shall be maintained in accordance with Section QA-I-6 of this Manual.
i
~
f i
I _.- --._ . - _ _ , _ . , - - _ - , _ _ - . . . . , , - , , ,.__.,_,,,,,,__,.-,_.y.
sios4/s.n pace 1 or 3 R2 EBA5CO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN mcompomatto g
l 4........ c. A....., - c. C INSPECTION "E V' 8 0" 2 R2 I care 3/4/81 R2
..........yfa..............
v 1.0 SCOPE This section establishes the requirements for the performance of safety related items and services at the construction site as necessary to assure compliance with documented instructions, procedures, specifications, drawings, codes, and regulatory requirements.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Site Quality Control shall be responsible for the following:
a) Development of written procedures for the inspection of safety-related items and services which list the required inspection activities when existing inspection documents such as standard specifications and drawings do not provide an adequate basis for inspection.
b) Submittal of inspection procedures to Ebasco Site Quality Assurance for review and acceptance in accordance with Section QA-III-ll of this Manual.
U c) Preparation of reports for all inspections made.
d) Control of inspection procedures and revisions thereto.
c) Scheduling and coordinating on-the-job training for quality control personnel in advance of implementation of the applicable inspection documents. This training shall be conducted in sufficient detail and with sufficient frequency to assure that the personnel responsi-ble for the inspection fully understand the requirements contained in the applicable inspection documents.
2.2 Site Quality Control shall be responsible for performing inspection activities in accordance with appropriate inspection documents.
2.3 Qualification of inspection personnel shall be in accordance with R2 applicable Quality Assurance procedures and Article 4.0 herein. R2 2.4 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality R2 Assurance Engineering Department shall be responsible for the performance R2 of reviews and audits in accordance with section QA-III-9 of this Manual <
to the extent necessary to assure compliance with the requirements of this Section.
~
3.0 GENERAL 3.1 Inspection documents shall be prepared based upon the quality require-b ments contained in purchase orders, specifications, quality control documents and procedures and applicable codes and standards.
l sioo4an.n paoa 2 or 3 R2 NUCLEAR QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION J O ESA5CO SERVICES l I mcompoaarao INSPECTION QA-III-ll V
3.2 If mandatory inspection hold points are required, the specific hold points shall be indicated on the inspection documents.
3.3 Inspection documents shall specify or reference as a minimum the
- activities to be performed, acceptance criteria, by whom activities are performed and the sequence in which the activities are to be performed.
3.4 Where mandatory inspection hold points are indicated on inspection documents or procedures, work may continue beyond a hold point only with the written approval of the Quality Control Site Supervisor or his qualified R2 designee.
3.5 Inspection reports shall certify that the items or services inspected meet the applicable quality requirements.
3.6 When inspections are to be performed by use of a sampling program the sample size shall be identified on the inspection documents. Justifi-cation for this sampling shall be based upon recognized standard construction practices, successful past experience, as well as the compleicity 'and function of the activity, item or service to be inspected.
4.0 TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF INSPECTION PERSONNEL 4.1 Inspection personnel shall have experience and training to assure their competence for performing inspection. The competence of personnel to perform '
inspections shall be developed by one or more of the following methods.
a) Providing personnel with working knowledge cf appropriate regulatory documents, practices, codes and standards b) Training or orientation in general and specialized methods of planning and performing inspections. '
c) On-the-job training under direct supervision of an experienced qualified inspector.
l 4.2 The requirements for training and qualification of inspectors shall be I Jn accordance with applicable Quality Assurance procedures, and qualification of inspectors shall be based upon consideration of the following: R2 a) Records of education and experience
( b) Test results, where applicable c) Results of capability determination 4.3 Inspectors performing inspections shall maintain their proficiency through one or more of the following methods: ,'
(NV) a) Regular, active participation in the inspection process b) Review and study of codes standards and procedures related to Quality Assurance Programs and program inspection. '
-. _ _ . _ . ._. _. . . _ _ . _ _ ~. - _ . = . . _ . . _ . - _
i sios4a/a.n m a a,. 3 or 3 R2
- NUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ESA5CO SERVICE 5 iNcomromarzo INSPECTION QA-III-ll i
i i
4.4 The Chief Quality Assurance Engineer or his designee shall periodically '
evaluate inspectors in accordance with applicable Quality Assurance procedures '
to assure that the inspectors are maintaining their proficiency.
5.0 RECORDS 9 9
5.1 All inspection documents shall be maintained in accordance with Section QA-I-6. R2 9
5.2 Records of training, experience and qualification of inspectors shall be maintained for all personnel who are performing inspection of who have pre- '
l viously performed inspection. These shall be retained for the same period of '
time as required for the inspection reports with which the inspectors are associated.
I l
l
, O
. - - . . - - . - - - - - _ - - . - _- _. ~_ .. - . . - . - . . . . - - . - . - . . . - . - . - ..-_.-.. . - . . _ . _ _
P4ac 1 of I sios4 n.7s !
\ .
ESA5CO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioM INCORPORATED QA-III-11 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT j
i j ELECTRIC GEllERATING STATI0ft aevis,ou Addendum 1 ,
[ Md
..............y.............
INSPECTION oare 3/4/87
- 1. Paragraph 2.1 (b): Second line. Revise reference section to be Section
. QA-III-1 in lieu of QA-III-11.
. i i
i j
j i
l
=, .
4 0
-- -,- ,- ,7-- +- w,, u
-y gar,---+w
O sio, sn 7s PAGE I oF 7 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION m gERVICES
, )
'E OA-TTT-17
~
TEST CONTROL nevision 1 o,,, 2/29/80
. ......;. m ......g .........
v
- l.0 SCOPE 1.1 This section describes the system employed at the Construction Site which dtSures that tests required to demonstrate that items will perform satisfac-torily in service are identified and documented. The requirements of this section apply to all phases of the testing program at the Construction Site including but not, limited to: functional testing, proof testing, acceptance testing and operational testing.
1.2 These tests shall be performed in accordance with written test procedures which include or reference the requirements and acceptance limits contained in applicable design documents.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Site Quality Control procedures shall provide for the following:
(a) training of personnel assigned to witness tests.
'N (b) methods for evaluating the condition of test equipment and the item to be tested.
(c) assure that only devices calibrated in'accordance with Section QA-III-13 of this Manual as used for the performance of tests.
(d) assure that tests are performed under proper environmental conditions.
(e) documentation of test results.
(f) methods for reviewing test reports to assure that test re-quirements have been satisfied.
(g) preparation of a final report (turnover package) on items which covers test results, results of preventive maintenance, and operational checkout prior to start-up.
(h) review of written test procedures by the organization that prepared the applicable design document.
2.2 Ebasco Quality Assurance Engineering shall review and comment on the written procedures for tests covered by this section. All comments shall be resolved prior to implementation of the procedures. These test proce-dures shall be reviewed in accordance with Quality Assurance Engineering R1 (s
f-procedures for the inclusion of:
_. __ . . . . - _ = _ . . .- -
sioo4an.n pass 2 or 2 HUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTros O
I EMSE0 iERVicE5 4ecom poa a reo TEST CONTROL QA-111-12
! (
(a) identification of items to be tested (b) identification of devices or equipment to be used during testing (c) test methods
- (d) operations to be performed (e) inclusion or reference of acceptance criteria
! (f) data to be recorded
! (g) requirements for qualified and/or certified personnel 2.3 Test repores shall be reviewed and signed off by Ebasco Quality Control in accordance with written procedures to assure that test requirements have been satisfied.
2.4 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Quality R1 Assurance Engineering Department shall be responsible for the performance R1 (N of reviews and audits in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of this Manual to the extent necessary to assure compliance to the requirements of this Section.
3.0 RECORDS I 3.1 All records pertaining to this section shall be maintained in accor-dance with Section QA-I-6.
l l
1 l
l l
. ._. . . _ . . _ - ._- - - _ - - , - - - . - - _ = - - - _ _ _ _ - . _ .
4
[ 41094/2 75 PAGE 1 OF 1 ESA5CO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION i INCORPORATED QA-III-12
. SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
] l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION Revisio,, Addendum 1
/MM) c.....m.n..p............. TEST CONTROL care 3/4/R7
- 1. Paragraph 2.1 (h): Delete all.
1 4
4 g
6 4
l
- l I
e i
i e
, , , - , - - - , , , . , - . - . , ---.,aw-,, w,,,,,n,mn-, e,,g,-,,--m-,,,w,.-----,,r.-., , . _ ... ,..-
. - . . ,.,n., -,a +, _,
sio,4n n pace 1 or 2 EBA5CO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION N INCORPORATED CONTROL OF MEASURING
\ g
,.w p ... [.. .. R e vision 2 g c. AND TESTING EQUIPMENT
~
h oATE 10/20/78
- _ N.. .a.
... ... ,.a ........
1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This section describes the requirements for control, calibration, adjustment and maintenance of measuring and testing devices used at the construction site for performing tests and inspections of safety-related items. These devices shall be calibrated and adjusted at specified, predetermined intervals using equipment having known valid relationships to nationally recognized standards.
1.2 The activities described herein shall be performed in accordance with written instructions, procedures, and/or drawings that have been developed and accepted in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-III-l of this Manual.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES The Site Quality Control Staff shall be responsible for performance of the following:
(; 2.1 Establish a list which includes the measuring and testing devices
( to be calibrated and the frequency of calibration of these devices.
The method and interval of calibration shall be based on the type of device, stability characteristics, required accuracy and other conditions affecting measurement control.
2.2 Assure that the measuring and testing devices used are of the proper range, type and accuracy to verify conformance to established requirements.
2.3 Maintain a master calibration file for each teasuring and testing device which includes at least the following information:
(a) name of device (b) device serial and/or identification number (c) frequency of calibration (d) date of last calibration (e) name of party performing last calibration (f) due date for next calibration 2.4 Assure that all measuring and testing devices are marked with calibration due dates when possible. When this marking is not possible, alternative methods of tracing the device to its calibration date (such as serialization) shall be employed.
2.5 Assure that all measuring and testing devices are calibrated in accordance with the requirements of this section and that the required
()-
( documentation is provided.
61094 A /2-75 PAGE OF NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION EBASCO SERVICES g ) meonnonArco CONTROL OF MEASURING QA-III-13 V AND TESTING EQUIPME!TI 2.6 Develop and maintain a system for issuance, collection and return of all measuring and testing devices. This system shall provide for the identification of personnel withdrawing devices, methods Nr issuing devices and methods for the collection and/or return of devices at prescribed calibration times or as otherwise required.
3.0 GENERAL 3.1 The standard of calibration utilized by those performing the calibration shall be in accordance with recognized criteria such as Departments of Weights and Measures, ASTM standards or others which are traceable to the National Bureau of Standards. If no national standards exist, the basis for calibration shall be documented.
3.2 Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE) shall be calibrated against working '
standards having tolerances not greater than one fourth (h) the tolerance of the M&TE. Tolerances greater than one fourth (k) shall be accepta.ble '
when limited by the state of the art. Reference standards shall be calibrated against higher level standards of closer tolerance. R2 For projects with Preliminary Safety Analysis Reports docketed on or before '
p October 19, 1977, M&TE shall be calibrated against working standards '
having tolerances not greater than the tolerance of the M&TE. Reference (V) standards shall be calibrated against higher level standards of closer tolerance.
3.3 Methods shall be employed to assure proper handling, storage and _
care of the M & T E in order to maintain its required accuracy. R2 3.4 Any M & T E found to be out of calibration shall be recalibrated. R2 When t l'T E *: 'ound to be out of calibration, an evaluation shall R2 be made to ascertain the validity of previous inspection or test results and the acceptability of components inspected and/or tested since the last calibration check. When it is necessary to assure the acceptability of suspect items, the original required inspections and/or tests shall be repeated using properly calibrated equipment.
3.5 If any of the M & T E is consistently found to be R2 out of calibration, it shall be repaired or replaced.
3.6 Inspection and test reports shall include identification of PU & T E R2 used to perform the inspections and/or tests.
3.7 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor shall be responsible for the performance of reviews and audits in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of the Manual to the extent necessary to assure compliance with the requirements of this Section.
(J ) 4.0 RECORDS 4.1 Records pertaining to this section shall be maintained in accordance with Section QA-I-6 of this manual.
,, t , 1 m 4 n 7s EBA5CO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUAI.lTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION INCORPOR ATED QA-III-13 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT l ELECTRIC GEllERATIf4G STATI0ft newmo,. Addendum 1
! ..Afpf..u ...mu. CONTROL 0F MEASURIfiG
"^ gj4jgp l
% .u m u .,y. AND TESTING EQUIPMENT
- 1. ' Paragraph 3.4: Second sentence, second line, commence the sentence as follows:
- "When 'M & TE is found to be out of calibration, damaged, lost or stolen, an evaluation shall..."
N l
e 9
e e
f stos4/2 7s Pact I or 4 EBA$CO SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
[7 incoamonate QA-III-14 j
i
... ~ ...
N/367. 6 .. Z
.t.
CONTROL OF RECEIVING, IIANDLING AND STORAGE are w R2 l / oart 3/4/81 g
........ ...v f .. .. . ......
1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This section describes the methods employed during receiving, handling and storage to assure that all safety-related items received at the construction site will be available and usable when needed. These requirements apply to both incoming items and site fabricated sub-assemblies which require temporary storage before assembly or installation. They also apply to both on-site and off-site facilities which are used for the storage of items under control of the Construction forces.
1.2 The activities described herein shall be performed in accordance with written instructions, procedures and/or drawings that have been developed and accepted in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-III-l of this Manual.
2.0 RECEIVING INSPECTION 2.1 Safety-related items utilized for fabrication, erection, installation, or modification shall be subjected to receiving inspection to assure conformance to the requirements of the applicable drawings, specifications and other docu-1 ments as required. Where source inspection is not performed, receiving inspec-L tion at site for acceptability will be performed.
2.2 Requirements 2.2.1 Site Quality Control Procedures shall provide for at least the
! followieg:
a - Establish designated material receiving areas and segregated holding areas for non-conforming items.
b - Assignment of quality control personnel to administer the system for inspection of storage areas and surveillance of maintenance activities to verify conformance with the system criteria.
c - Performance of receiving inspection activities in accordance l with approved receiving inspection procedures.
i l d - Provisions for rejection of unsatisfactory items.
e - Adequate record maintenance system.
i 2.3 Receiving Inspection Procedure n 2. 3.1 Receiving inspection procedures shall be written by the Quality fA Control Staff in accordance with the requirements of this Manual. These procedures shall provide instructions and checklists for performing receiving inspection and shall include at least the following activities:
i l '
l
i e m 4A n.7s pass 2 or 4 MUCLEAR MIALITY ASEURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ESASCO SERVICES mcom pon Avro CONTROL OF RECEIVING, QA-III-14
' HANDLING AND STORAGE i !
, a) Documentation review to assure that the documentation package I has been received and that a signed " Release for Shipment" ,
l form accompanies the items received.
b) Visual Examination
! c) Marking & Tagging for Traceability f d) Testing when specified l
l e) Preparation for Storage 3.0 HANDLING i
I 3.1 Handling practices applied to safety-related items shall assure minimum possibility for damage or loss of environmental protection.
i.
3.2 Requirements j 3.2.1 Site Quality Control Procedures shall provide for at least the l followinr:
! a) Review of handling requirements for safety-related items.
b) Performance of appropriate inspections to assure that j handling operations have not jeopardized item integrity.
4.0 , STORAGE i 4.1 All safety-related items shall be stored in predetermined locations and storage levels as outlined below. In-place storage in permanent location is permited for large items provided that the permanent location is ready for the quipment installation. If the permanent location does
- not afford the required level of protection, additional protection shall be provided to meet the requirements of the required storage level.
l 4.2 Requirements I 4.2.1 Site Quality Control procedures shall provide for at least R2 the following:
a) Establishment of the storage levels listed below:
- 1) Level A - Indooor Controlled Environment
- 2) Level B - Indoor Heated and Ventilation Controlled I~ 3) Level C - Indoor or Equivalent - Ventilation Controlled
-g .
- 4) Level D - Outdoor
)
i
)
4
sioe44/s 7s pace 3 or 4 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
$ 3 CONTROL OF RECEIVING, EkA$C ON eCR 'o c0 HANDLING AND STORAGE QA-III-14 b) Maintenance of storage facilities to provide safeguards for the control of items such as the following:
- 1) Physical condition of storage area
- 2) Access to storage area
- 3) Fire protection
- 4) Prohibited materials c) Surveillance of stored items to assure their integrity d) Preparation of general storage plans which list types of items and their intended storage locations and levels.
Such plans shall be prepared prior to receipt of items on site.
e) Organization of Storage areas to raintain proper segregation of materials. Items shall retain an appropriate identification for retrievability and inventory control, as applicable to the
,-ss nature and use of the material.
s ,/ f) Provisions for preservation of ' items in storage, as required by special conditions.
g) Storage records for items going into storage on the appropriate inventory, storage and Quality Control records. These records ;
shall be so maintained that each individual item can be located and examined or released for use with a: minimum of delay.
h) Material Withdrawal Request - The withdrawal of any component, assembly, system, or materials from the warehouse or storage areas shall be by material withdrawal request initialed by the responsible supervisor or his designated representative. The request shall identify the material and applicable references to a drawing or specification.
l i) Materials Release - Warehouse or storage area personnel shall issue the material, confirming or indicating the applicable material identification on the release form. Such records shall be used for .aintaining inventory, production control, and traceability of materials required by project specifications and applicable codes, j) Qualification of personnel performing receiving inspection,
- storage and handling functions. R2 O)
(
v
s too4 A/a.7s . page 4 or 4 NUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MAWJAL SECT low i
ESASCO SERVICES m co a po r..r e o CONTROL OF RECEIVING, QA-III-14 HANDLING AND STORAGE i
5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEERING I
l 5.1 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor shall be responsible for the R1 following:
a) Assigning Site Quality Assurance personnel to audit R1 i documentation for items received on the construction site.
This shall be performed in accordance with Site Quality Assurance procedures. R1 b) The performance of reviews and audits in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of this Manual to the extent necessary to assure compliance to the requiremetns of this Section.
i I
4 i i
(
l B
s .
l l
l i
n
sios4/2 7s pa:c 1 cr ESA5Co SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN mconpon Ar so QA-III-14 x SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
'l j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION newsion Addendum 1 d 2 CONTROL OF RECEIVING, k .gj
...,. m .n .yj..... .... ..
liANDLINu AND STORAGE o^7s 3/4/R2
- 1. Paragraph 1.0 - SCOPE:
- a. Paragraph 1.1: ' Revise first sentence t'o read as fo'llows:
"This section describes the methods employed during receiving, handling, storage and installation, to assure that all safety-related items re-ceived by the Ebasco Construction Department will be usable when needed."
- b. Add Paragraph 1.3 to read: .
The storage of safety-related items maintained in facilities under the di-rect control. of the Client or his designee is excluded from the scope of this manual.
- 2. Paragraph 2.2.1 (b): Second.line. Delete "...of storage areas..."
- 3. Paragraph 2.3.1: First and second line revise'to read:
\
" Quality Control Site Supervisor or his designee." in lieu of " Quality
(' Control Staff."
- 4. Paragraph 4.1:
- a. First line, delete the word " predetermined."
- b. Third line, correct the word " permitted."
- c. Fourth line, correct the word " equipment."
- 5. Paragraph 4.2.1 (a) (1): Correct the word " Indoor."
- 6. Paragraph 4.2.1 (b): First line use word " location" in lieu of " facilities.
- 7. Paragraph 4.2.1 (d): Last line, end of paragraph: Delete "on site."
l
- 8. Paragraph 4.2.1 (f): First line, delete the words "in storage."
m Paragraph 4.2.1 (i):
-(v Ii
- 9. Delete in its entirety.
l 1
1 A
- 6109 4 /2 75 PAGE 2 CF 7 ESA5Co SERVICES NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTloN INCORPORATED Qk-III-14 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT l ELECTRIC GEf4ERATING STATI0ft ,,y,sonAddendum 1
//Ay f< ....a. C0flTROL 0F RECEIVIf1G, ,,,, 3f4fgp m .n fpo.....
....... HAfiDLIf4G Afl0 STORAGE
- 10. -Paragraph 5.1 (a): Second line.
- a. Use" word "by" in lieu of "on."
bi Use word " department" in lieu of " site."
i i
e e
! e e
6
- - - + . - . - 2-. .---.w,--_ym- - - .
_ --------,:~..--,.--,
sio,4n.ts pace I or 2 EBASCO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL S ECT10N incoanomars QA-III-15
(} INSPECTION, TEST & OPERATING STATUS 3 { [ x.. .. .
{ ...<........., a e visio n g
g spd[gy# o,,, 2/29/80
.................f.........
V
~1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This section establishes requirements for identifying and documenting the status of inspections and tests performed on safety-related items at the con-struction site and the status of the readiness of these items for initial operation.
1.2 The activities described herein shall be performed in accordance with written instructions, procedures, and/or drawings that have been developed and accepted in accordance with the requirements of Section QA-III-1. Procedures and inatructions shall include identification and authority of the individuals or groups responsible for application and removal of status indicators.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES Site Quality Control shall be responsible for the following: R1 2.1 Develop and maintain a system for marking and tagging safety-related items.
This system shall provide for the identification and maintenance of the status
(# j of inspections and tests performed on these it; ems throughout fabrication, in-sta11ation, erection and operation. This system shall provide methods which Ny assure that only items that have passed the required inspections and tests are used, installed or operated. Where physical tagging is either impractical or insufficient, procedural control or other anpropriate means for maintaining item status shall be employed.
2.2 Control and maintain a log of the issuance and removal of all status in-dicators.
2.3 Develop and implement plans for the witnessing and documenting the re-sults of inspections and tests.
2.4 Provide methods for assuring that all required inspections and tests are performed (checklists, travelers, etc.) .
2.5 Develop and implement a system for marking and tagging to indicate the initial operating status of safety-related items which are in test, rework, or other initial operating status, so as to prevent inadvertent operation.
2.6 Develop and implement a system for marking and tagging of all safety-related items during pre-operational testing. This system shall provide for maintaining records of status indicators placed on boundaries or within systems turned over to the Client.
fG')
c o,44/a.7s pass 2 or 2 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL section
_) ESA5CO SERVICES
[Q ** "" "*" INSPECTION, TEST & OPERATING STATUS QA-111-15 2.7 Maintain a log containing entries of all systems turned over from Construction forces for pre-operational testing. This log shall be main-tained for quality status reference.
3.0 GENERAL 3.1 Quality Control procedures shall require that inspection and test status be maintained by the use of status indicators such as tags, markings, travelers, stamps inspection records, work sequence plans, or other appro-priate means.
3.2 The progress of fabrication, installation, erection, inspection and test shall be entered on appropriate documents. Provisions shall be made for updating these documents to reflect current conditions.
3.3 Nonconforming safety-related items shall be clearly identified and marked and shall be processed in accordance with Section QA-III-6.
3.4 Records of tests and inspection results shall be prepared and maintained in an orderly and systematic manner.
3.5 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or.his designee from the Quality R1
[
Ns Assurance Engineering Department shall be responsible for the performance of R1 reviews and audits in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of this Manual to the extent necessary to assure compliance to the requirements of this section.
4.0 RECORDS 4.1 Records pertaining to this section shall be maintained in accordance with Section QA-I-6.
1 I
i
. . . - . ~ _ _ _ _ - . . __.. _._. ... . . _ _. .. . __.--_. . - . . . ._. - ~. - _.- _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ . ._.
sios4n.7s pace 1 or I EBASCO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION QA-III-15 i incompomarzo SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT j
ELECTRIC GEfiERATIflG STATI0fl . ncvisio,, Addendum 1
- N/ IflSPECTION, TEST & OPERATING STATUS o^te 3/4/82
< ...... ....,.p ............
l 1. Para raph 2.6: Add the following at the end of the para. graph, af ter Client:
I "or his designee."
e i
6 t
- _ , - . , . .__.__,-..._-___.,m-_,._,___.,___._____.,.-....,,--_,__,,.-...,,,__.,_.-.,,_m ,,,,,,,% ,, . _ . , _ _ _ - _ , , _ , _ _ , _ _ - . - - .
stos s/2 7s PAGE I or 4 EBASCO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION 1NCoRPORATED Appendix I 1
i h casiawa= ova 6. poseau co.
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS REW ssON l oATE 9/30/76
< .a........
. . . . ,7. u n This Appendix contains certain terms and their definitions used in this Manual that are important to the uniform understanding of the Manual and its application. Where a term is used to convey a different intent than that related herein, clarification must be provided at the point of application:
ACTIVITIES AFFECTING QUALITY - (Quality-related activities) - activities affecting the quality of safety-related items including designing, purchasing, fabricating, handling, shipping, storing, cleaning, erecting, installing, inspecting, and testing.
AUDIT - A planned and documented activity performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists to verify, by examination and evaluation of objective evidence, that applicable elements of a quality assurance program have been developed, documented and effectively implemented in accordance with applicable regulatory documents, guidelines or requirements.
An audit does not include surveillance or inspection for the purpose of process control or product acceptance.
O h
AUDITS (EX~ERNAL) - Audits of any Supplier's Quality' Assurance Program i or portions thereof.
l AUDITS (INTERNAL) - Audits performed by Ebasco personnel on those Ebasco departments that are governed by the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program.
BIDDER - An individual organization requested to submit a quotation or proposal for furnishing specified items or services. A bidder is not R1 under contract to provide such items or services.
EBASCO ENGINEERING OFFICE - An integral engineering unit where design, engineering, procurement and related functions are performed.
l l
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS - A contractual agreement, including specification (s),
l attachment (s), drawing (s) and commercial terms and conditions. Construction Contracts are awarded by the Site offices and cover the furnishing of R1 services and materials required to erect /or install a facility or component.
In some cases the furnishing of equipment procured from a manufacturer may j be included.
CONSTRUCTION OPERATION - Activities related to construction of a nuclear power station.
- INQUIRY - Collective term describing an invitation to bid (consisting of specifications (s) and attachment (s), as well as drawings and commercial terms l
and conditions) sent to prospective suppliers; not a contractual document.
\
\
paos 2 ,,
oes44n.n HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
(, EBASCO SERVICE 5 inconponArco TERMS AND DEFINITIONS Appendix I I i
l INSPECTION - A phase of quality control which by means of examination, observation or measurement determines the conformance of items or services to pr1 determined quality requirements.
INSTRUCTIONS - Written descriptions of activities to be performed, including job specifications, work instructions, shop construction drawings, job tickets, planning sheets, operating or procedure manuals, test procedures or other written forms, to assure that the activity is adequately described. R1 ITEM - Any level of unit assembly, including structure, system, sub-system, component, part or material.
NONCONFORMANCE - A deficiency in characteristic, documentation or procedure which renders the quality of an item or service unacceptable.
Items discovered to be out of tolerance of specification at routine check points of an inspection process shall not be considered as a nonconformance provided:
a) The conditions is corrected prior to acceptance of the work.
I b) The work does not proceed beyond the check point until the correction is made.
c) The condition does not affect work previously accepted.
d) No violation of Procedure or Code is evident.
PROJECT PROCEDURES MANUAL - Manual developed for a project which contains procedures and/or instructions for implementing contract obligations.
PURCHASE ORDER - Collective term describing a contractual agreement, including specification (s) and attachment (s), drawing (s), and commercial terms and conditions. Purchase Orders may be issued by the Engineering R1 and Site Offices and generally cover the furnishing of materials, equipment and/or services by a supplier. In so:ae cases erection labor may be included.
QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) RECORDS - are those records which furnish documentary evidence of the quality of items and of activities affecting quality. A document is considered a quality assurance record when the document has been completed. QA Records may be either the original or a reproduced copy.
QA RECORDS (LIFETIME) - are those records which meet one or more of the following criteria:
/, w\
! x a) Those whfch would be a rignificant value in demonstrating capability for proper functioning of safety-related items.
pace 3 o, 4 u os4A n-rs HUCLEAR QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION
" compoNeo 5 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS Appendix I b) Those would be of significant value in maintaining, reworking, repairing, replacing or modifying the item.
c) Those which would be of significant value in determining the cause of an accident or malfunction of an item.
d) Those which provide required baseline data for inservice inspection.
QA RECORDS (NONPERMANENT) - are those which meet all of the following criteria:
a) Those of no significant value in demonstrating capability for safe operation.
b) Those of no significant value in maintaining, reworking, repairing, replacing or modifying the item.
c) Those of no significant value in determining the cause of malfunction of an item.
d) Those which do not provide baseline data for inservice inspection.
QUALITY TREND - A consistent reporting of conformance or nonconformance with, applicable criteria attributed to a specific organizational unit.
SAFETY-RELATED ITEM - Any item designated by Ebasco Engineering, in secordance with the guidelines established by the Ebasco Licensing '
Department, to be Safety Class 1, 2, 3, Seismic Category I or R1 I
l electrical Class IE and any other items as designated by the Licensing R1 Department and indicated as safety-related in the PSAR or FSAR. R1 l
i SAFETY-RELATED SERVICE - Any service performed that directly affects the quality of a safety-related item.
SERVICE - Performance of nuclear safety-related activities such as design, fabrication, inspection, nondestructive examination, installation and test.
SOURCE SURVEILLANCE - review, observation and/or examination at the location of material or equipment procurement for the purpose of verifying that purchased items are supplied in accordance with purchase order requirements.
s 'SPECIAL PROCESS - A special process is a fabrication, testing or inspection (s
N' )
operation whose correct performance is governed by parameters established during qualification testing for the operation, e.g., welding and nondestructive testing.
_- . . - ~ . _ . - . - - . ~ - - - - - - - - . . - . - . _ - . . - - - - - - - - - - _ . ~ . - - . - - ._---.-_s. _-~a . - . .
i 4
41034Af to.74 PAGE _4 _ or 4 HUCLEAR QU ALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANU AL SECTION ESASCO SERVICES Appendix I iNeomromarec TERMS AND DEFINITIONS l
a i
SUPPLIER - Any individual or organization under contract for furnishing items or services, including the terms Vendor, Seller, Contractor, Subcontractor, l Fabricator, Consultant, and subtier levels of these where appropriate.
1 j
i i
l 4
1 l
i l
l
- '/
t i
l l
\
i
)
1 I
i
l '
,,,, 1 ,, I sios4n.7s E8ASCO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY AMURANCE PROG' TAM MANUAL sEcTioM l INCORPORATED APP-1
! SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT j j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION navi ouAddendum 1 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS "^rs 3/4/R7 i
- 1. 'Page 3 of 4, Safety-Re' lated Item j Revis5 first and second line to red "Bechtel" in lieu of "Ebasco."
t 4
+
4 i
7 i
l .
m l
i
--..n - . - , . - . - , , , _ . , _ _ . - . , . - - - . .- , - . , - - - - - - - - . , , - . , - , - - - . . . . . - - - - - - - - - . , - , , - - , , _ . _ - - - , . , - - - - _ , - - . - - - - , - - . . - .-------n. - - - - - . - - . . .
1 61094/2 75 PAGE 1 OF la EBASCO SERVICES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION INCORPORATED V :l [g[gp...er- c o- EBASCO POSITIONS ON US NUCLEAR
" E V' 5' 0" g ...,~.,s.6. REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDES l oATE 10/20/78 4
ca Ir g 6&v .s p .=ca ansinsta REGULATORY GUIDE 1.28 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION) (SAFETY GUIDE 28, REVISION 0, 6/72)
EBASCO POSITION Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position as written, with no exceptions or clarifications to the guide.
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.30 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF INSTRUMENTATION AND ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT (SAFETY GUIDE 30, REVISION 0, 8/72)
EBASCO POSITION Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position as written with no exceptions or clarifications to the guide.
REGUALTORY GUIDE 1.37 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CLEANING OF FLUID SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED COMPONENTS OF WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (REVISION 0, 3/73)
EBASCO POSITION Ebesco commits to comply with the regulatory position as written, with no exceptions or clarifications to the guide.
REGUALTORY GUID" 1.38 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR PACKAGING, SHIPPING, STORAGE AND HANDLING OF ITEMS FOR WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER Pi. ANTS (REVISION 2, 5/77)
EBASCO POSITION Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position with the following clarifica-tions:
CLARIFICATION Item-ANSI N 45.2.2-1972 Ebasco believes the intent of the ANSI Subdivision 2.7 classification of protection levels is met if equipment identified in Level B and C categories which was specifically designed for outdoor environment is stored at Level D (outdoor) conditions.
l V)
sioe4an-n paos 2 or 4 HUCLEAR QUALITY A55URANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION Cj '
EBA5CO SERVICE 5
- "" "^
EBASCO POSITIONS ON US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDES APPENDIX II REGULATORY GUIDE 1.38 -(cont.)
Regulatory Position Ebasco believes that storage conditions should be such C.1.c and C.2.c that desiccants, their bags and tapes should not be sub-jected to leaching or radiation. Even if accidental leaching or radiation occurs, desiccants and tapes are removed prior to component installation. Subsequent routine flushing and/or cleaning would remove any harmful residues.
Ebasco will impose the more readily interpretable require-ments of 0.25% maximum halogens for desiccants (C.1.c) and 0.10% halogen and sulfur content for tape (C.2.c)
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.39 HOUSEKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (REVISION 2, 9/77)
EBASCO POSITION Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position with the following clarifica-i i
/N tion:
CLARIFICATION Item-General Ebasco acceptance applies only to the regulatory require-ments for controls at the site during the construction phase and not to the operational aspects of this guide or the referenced documents.
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.58 QUALIFICATION OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INSPECTION, j EXAMINATION, AND TESTING PERSONNEL (REVISION 0, 8/73)
EBASCO POSITION Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position as written, with no exceptions or clarifications to the guide.
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.64 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DESIGN OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (REVISION 2, 6/76)
EBASCO POSITION Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position as written, with no exceptions or clarifications to the guide.
s'oo4A/2 75 PAGE 1 OF d NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION ESA5CO $ERVICES EBASCO POSITIONS ON US NUCLEAR REGULATORY incoapon An COMMISSION REGULAIORY GUIDES APPENDIX II REGULATORY GUIDE 1.70 STANDARD FORMAT AND CONTENT OF SAFETY ANALYSIS (Chapter 17) REPORTS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (REVISION 2, 9/75)
EBASCO POSITION The Quality Assurance Program and its applicability to safety related activities and services performed by Ebasco in the design and construction of nuclear power plants is fully delineated in this topical report (ETR-1001).
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.74 QUALITY ASSURANCE TERMS AND DEFINITIONS (REVISION 0, 2/74)
EBASCO POSITION Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position as written, with no exceptions or clarifications to the guide.
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.88 COLLECTION, STORAGE, AND MAINTENANCE OF UUCLEAR POWER PLANT QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS (REVISIONS 2, 10/76) v
)
EBASCO PGSITION Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position as written, with no exceptions or clarifications to the guide.
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.94 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION, INSPECTION AND TESTING OF STRUCTURAL CONCRETE AND STRUCTURAL STEEL DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (REVISION 1, 4/76)
EBASCO POSITION Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position as written, with no exceptions or clarifications to the guide for projects with Preliminary Safety Analysis Reports docketed on or after October 19, 1977. For prior projects, Ebasco will comply with the applicable Safety Analysis Report and othc associated commitments as approved by the NRC.
G
61094A/2 75 PAGE d OF d HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTION i EBA5CO SERVICE 5 EBASCO POSITIONS ON US NUCLEAR REGUALTORY
- "" "^*' APPENDIX II COMMISSION REGULLTORY GUIDES REGULATORY GUIDE 1.116 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALL-ATION, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF MECHANICAL EQUTPMENT.AND SYSTEMS (REVISION 0-R, 5/77)
- EBASCO POSITION l
Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position with no exceptions or clarifi-cations to the guide.
l REGULATORY GUIDE 1.123 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTROL OF PROCUREMENT OF ITEMS AND SERVICES FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (REVISION 1, 7/77) l EBASCO POSITION Ebasco commits to comply with the regulatory position with no exceptions or clarifi-catiom: to the guide.
ANSI N45.2.12 REQUIREMENTS FOR AUDITING OF QUALITY ASSUR-ANCE PROGRAMS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (DRAFT O 3, REVISION 4, 2/74)
EBASCO POSITION As presently written, EBASCO commits to comply with this standard with no exceptions of clarifications.
l I *
, V
sio,4 n.7s Page I c, 6 ESA5Co SERVICES HUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioN iwconponArco APP-II SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT p j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION nevis,ou Addendum 1 V !
gj EBASCO POSITIONS ON US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORV GUIDES S^7" 3/4/r'-
. . . u . m . n .,.p . . . . . . . . . u .
- 1. Revise Appendix II to.the following:
Ti tle: Ebasco exceptions to US Nuclear Regulatory Guides and ANSI standards indicated in Section QA-I-1.
- 1. ANSI N.45.2.5-1974, Section 4.8, states " Pumped concrete must be sampled from the pump line discharge." In lieu of this statement, in-process strength samples of pumped concrete are taken at the delivery point. Cor-relation tests of air content, slump,' and temperature are performed to verify these plastic properties of the concrete at the placement point
.in accordance with the following. frequency requirements:
A. A minimum of 2 correlation tests are performed for each pumped place-ment exceeding 200 cu. yds.
B. Otherwise, a minimum of 2 correlation tests per week are performed when any individual pumped placement during a week requires delivery of more than one truckload of concrete.
.( ) C. During a week wh'en a pumpe'd. placement exceeding 200 cu. yds. is made, the correlation tests performed on that placement will satisfy the
( '/
weekly requirement for performing two correlation tests as specified in Item B above.
When any of the specified limits and tolerances on loss of air content, slump, or temperature are exceeded at the placement point, correlation tests between the delivery point and placement point, will be accomplished for each 100 cu. yds. of concrete placed as long as limits and tolerances are exceeded. If two consecutive tests 'are out of tolerance, corrective action will be implemented to adjust the limits for the concrete entering the pump intake so that no concrete from the subsequent trucks will enter the pump intake as long as the tolerances are exceeded.
" Correlation Tests," " Delivery Point," and " Placement Point" are as defined in ANSI N.45.2.5-1978, Section 1.4. -
- 2. Samples and frequency for cadweld testing is in accordance with ACI-359-ASME Section III, Division 2, issued for trial use and comment in 1973, including addenda 1 through 6, (see Sections 3.8.1.6.3 and 3.8.3.6.3 of the STP Final Safety Analysis Report).
,v; y t
O
sm 4n.n eA:s 2 cr 6 EBA$Co SERVICES NUCLEAR QUAllTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANdAL SECTION INCORPORATED APP-II SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
(~'N j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION neviseN Addendum 1 f< /MW
....,...ung,,............
EBASCO POSITIONS ON US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDES o,,, 3/4fgp
- 3. Section 2.1, Planning. The required planning is frequently performed on a generic basis for application to many installations on one or more pro-jects. This results in standard procedures or plans for installation and inspection and testing which meet the requirements of the standard. In-dividual plans for each item or system are not normally prepared unless the work operations are unique. However, standard procedures or plans will be reviewed for applicability in each case. Installation plans or procedures are also limited in scope to those actions or activities which are essen-tial to maintain or achieve required quality. This is consistent with Section II, Paragraphs 2 and 3 of ANSI N45.2-1971 which provides for exami-nation, measurement, or testing to assure quality or indirect control by monitoring of processing methods. However, final cleaning or flushing activities will be performed in accordance with procedures specific to the system.
- 4. Se; tion 4, Preinstallation Cleanliness. This section states, " Items should not be delivered to the Point of installation site sooner than necessary unless the installed location is considered a better storage area." As an alternate to this requirement iten:3 may be delivered to the installation (o)
'V site sooner than absolutely necessary when determined to be advantageous for other considerations, for example, reduced handling or easier access, thereby reducing susceptibility to handling damage. In all such cases, equipment stored in place will be protected in accordance with Section 5 of ANSI N45.2.1.
- 5. Section 3.1.2, Ebasco i~nterprets the lighting level of 100 footcandles to be guidance. It is Ebasco's normal practice that the lighting level for determining " metal clean" of accessible surfaces of piping and components is determined by the inspector. Typically he uses a standard two-cell flashlight supplemented by other lighting as he deems necessary.
- 6. Section 2.7, Classification of Items. The four-level classificatior, system may not be used explicitly. However, the specific requirements for each classification as specified in the standard will be applied to the items suggested in each classification and for similar items.
Classification differing from Section 2.7 will be considered acceptable provided no degradation is assured; for example, electric motors designed for outside service may be stored in level C area rather than a level B.
- 7. Section 6.2, Storage Areas. Paragraph 6.2.1 requires. control and limited access to storage areas. In lieu of and to amplify this paragraph, the fol- -
lowing will be applied:
O)
L
c siw4n 75 PAGE CF b E8ASCo SERYlCES HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTIoM INCORPORATED APP-II SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT p j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION Revision Addendum 1 Q) 5 o f
AgAj
....m, . . .........
EBASCO POSITIONS ON US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDES on, 3/4/ap
" Access to storage areas for levels A, B, a'nd C will be controlled by the individual (s) resp'onsible for material storage." Lev'el D items will be stored in a site area which will have access control consistent with Zone IV of ANSI N45.2.3-1973. While the areas will be posted to limit access, other positive controls (other than that for the overall site area) or guards may not be provided.
- 8. Section 5.5, Correction.of Nonconformances. This section provides for
" rework" and "use as is" dispositions for nonconforming items. As an alter-nate, the " repair" disposition (as defined in ANSI N45.2.10-1973) will also be used.
- 9. Section 6.2.4, Storage of Food and Associated Items. Controlled areas, within storage areas, will be established for the storage of food, drink, and salt tablets. These areas will be controlled through normal super-vision and inspection.
- 10. In Section 8, the control of documentation -and records shall be in accor-dance with Section QA-I-6 of the Ebasco QA Program Manual for the STP.
.t
)
(" j 11. Appendix A3.4.2, Inert Gas Blankets. There may be cases involving large or complex shapes for which an inert.or dry air purge flow is provided rather than a static gas blanket in order to provide adequate protection due to difficulty of providing a leakproof barrier. In these cases a positive pressure purge flow may be uti.lized as an alternative to the leakproof barrier.
- 12. Section 2.1, Planning. The required planning is frequently performed on a generic basis for application. to many installation on one or more projects.
This results in standard procedurei or plans for installation and inspection and testing which meet the requirements of the standard. Individual plans for each item or system are not normally prepared unless the work opera-tions are unique. However, standard procedures or plans will be reviewed for applicability in each case. Installation plans or procedures are also limited in scope to those actions or activities which are essential to ,
maintain or achieve required quality.
- 13. Alternative equivalent zone designations and requirements may be utilized to cover those situations not included in the subject standard; for example, situations in which shoe covers and/or coveralls are required but material accountability is not. In addition, zones might be combined into the next more restrictive category in order to reduce total number of zones.
- 14. Section 1.3, Applicsbility. The standard is applied to the item.s and sys-
,Q l tems identified in Paragraph 1.1.1 and to additional systems depending on
( ), the nature and scope of the work to be performed and theimportance of the L/ t item or service involved.
e
r 6109 6/2 75 P A1l[g 4 gr 6 ESA5Co SERVICES HUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTioH INCORPORATED APP-II SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT p) j ELECTRIC GErlERATING STATI0ft RevisieN Ad6endum 1 y/ [ g,fgj EBASCO POSITIONS ON US flVCLEAR
^'" gf4fg7
% c. m . m n.,,7,o m e......... REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDES
- 15. Section 2.1, Planning. The required planning is frequently performed on a-generic basis for application to many installation on one or more projects.
This results in standard procedures or plans for installation and inspections and testing which meet the requirements of the standard. Individual plans for each item or system are not normally prepared unless the work opera-tions are unique. However, standard procedures or plans will be reviewed for applicability in each case. Installation plans or procedures are also limited in scope to those actions or activities which are essential to maintain or achieve required quality.
- 16. Section 1.1, Scope. The term "important items" will be interpreted to apply to those activities or quality attributes.of an item or service that could affect a nuclear safety-related characteristic. For example, if a barrier is required for leakage control, but serves no structural function, the leaktight characteristic would be considered "important," but appear-ance, dimensional requ1rements, and structural features would not necessarily
. be considered importan; or if a pump casing is required for coolant boundary integrity, but the pump does not have to operate to provide for nuclear (q
.N J
)
safety, those attributes which affect its operation would not be considered important from the standpoint of nuclear safety.
Section 2.1, Planning. The required planning is frequently performed on a generic basis for application to mar.y installations on one or more projects.
This results in standard procedures or plans for installation and inspection and testing which meet the requirements of the standard. Individual plans for each item or system are not normally prepared unless the work operations are unique. However, standard procedures or plans will be reviewed for ap-plicability in each case. Installation plans or procedures are also limited in scope to those cctions or activities which are essential to maintain or achieve required quality.
- 17. Section 3.3, Process and Procedures. The terms " installation site," "in-stallation area," and " site" used in this standard shall be interpreted as follows:
a) " Installation site" or " site" will be interpreted the same as " con-struction site." When applied to documents, these may be at the central office or work area document' control station, b) Installation area Immediate proximity of location where work is to be performed.
- 18. Section 3.5(e), Site _ Conditions. This requirement wi,ll be applied only if -
subsequent correction of adjacent nonconfonnances could damage the item
[mT being installed.
()
6109 4 /2 75 PAGE CF b EBA5Co SERVICES HUCLEAR QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTiori suconponATeo APP-II SOUTH TEXAS PP.0 JECT.
p l j
O ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION nem ouAddendum 1 (d
[
/ g Mavam) EBASCO POSITIONS ON US NUCLEAR oare 3/4/82 c,,,u om n 7,po.c a ..**" *a REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULA10RY GUIDES Section 4.6, Care of Items. HL&P retains. the authori.ty and is the "Respon-sible Organizatiori" for temporary useage of equipment or facilities unless i
specific (i.e. on a case by case basis) or general authority is granted in writing to the Construction Manager's organization.
- 19. Section 1.4, Definitions. Quality Assurance Records - A document is con-sidered complete when it has finished full processing and has been issued for use in design, procurement, construction, or manufacturing.
- 20. Section 1.4, Definitions. Authenticated Records - Those records which are-clearly identified as a statement by the individual or organization holding responsibili ty. Handwritten signatures are not required if the document or printout is clearly identified as a statement by the reporting individual or organization.
~
- 21. For Appendix A, an installation shall be considered to be in an "as con-structed" condition if it is installed within the tolerances established by Project Engineering indicated in the design output documents.
) 22. Section C.3 of the R'egulatory Guide - A corrective action system may, de-(^#
/ pending upon complexity and/or importance to safety of theitem or service provided, be imposed upon the supplier. When a corrective action system is imposed on a supplier, the ' applicable elements of Section 9.0 of the stand-ard will be included arid its ' implementation will be verified.
- 23. Section C.4 of the Regulatory.' Guide - Applicable information concerning the method.(s) of acceptance of an item or service will be made available to receiving inspection personnel.
- 24. Section 4.2.a of the Standard -- When evaluation of a supplier is based solely on historical supplier data, these data will primarily include re-cords of the owner, the Project Manager, or Ebasco that have been accumulat-ed in connection with previous procurement actions. Data that includes ex-perience of users of identical or'similar products of theprospective sup-plier and product operating experience will be used if they become avail-
, able; however, such data are normally available only to those involved in pla.nt operations.
- 25. Section 10.2.3 of the Standard - The requirements of this section are inter-preted as follows: The person attesting to a certificate shall be an au-thorized and responsible employee of the supplier and shall be identified by the supplier.
U;
6 6 s t or.4/r.7s PAGE CF EBA5Co SERYlCE5 HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL SECTloN INCORPORATED .
APP-II SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
($ l ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION RewsiOu Addendum 1 V !
ggg .p
....,...ur o.............
EBASCO POSITIONS ON US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDES
^'" 3/4/82
- 26. Ebasco's position relative to ANSI N45.2.13-1976, Section 10.2.f, Verifi-cation of the Validity of Supplier Certificates and the Effectiveness of the Certification System, is as follows: The verification of the validity of supplier certificates and the effectiveness of the certification system are accomplished as an integral part of the total supplier control and product acceptcnce program, and no separate Ebasco system exists that addresses itself solely to such verification. The degree of verification required will depend upon the type of item or service and their safety importance.
This means of verification may include source witness / hold points, source audits, and document reviews; independent inspections at the time of ma-terial receipt; user tests on selected commodities, usch as concrete com-ponents; and tests after installation on selected components and systems.
All of these means verify whether or not a supplier is fulfilled procurement document requirements and whether or not a certification system is effective. '
V e
l
- u 5
h v
e
- . . , - . . . , , - - . . . . - . . - - - , .. , - , . -