ML20041A256
| ML20041A256 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 02/05/1982 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041A257 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8202190333 | |
| Download: ML20041A256 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000373/1982002
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
o
.
' i i'
o tha
s
s
<
.
%
q
Docket No. 50-373
gdOIWED
3.
&
-
Commonwealth Edison Company
_-
FEB 181982> r
ATTN:
Mr. Cordell Reed
4
6, n mu tcan esmag
Vice President
n.ununmn
Post Office Box 767
/
,
Chicago, IL 60690
0;
Gentlemen:
'
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs. R. Lanksbury,
F. Maura, and F. Reimann of this office on January 5-8, 12-15, 19 and 20, 1982,
of activities at LaSalle County Nuclear Station, Unit 1, authorized by NRC
Construction Permit No. CPPR-99 and to the discussion of our findings with
Messrs. B. Stephenson and R. Bishop at the conclusion of the inspection.
The inspection was an examination of activities conducted under your license
as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's
rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspec-
tion consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative
records, observations, independent measurements, and interviews with
personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in non-
compliance with NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Appendix.
A written response, submit.ted under oath or affirmation, is required.
During the inspection, we identified an apparent lack of controls for
tracking the status of commitments made to the NRC. Therefore, in your
response to the item of noncompliance please outline the actions you plan
to take to insure that commitments are tracked and that corrective actions
stated in your responses are resolved by the specified due dates.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
I
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
in the NRC's Public Document R_oom.
If this report contains any information
that you (or your contractors)lbelieve to be exempt from disclosure under
10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by tele-
phone within ten (10) days from the date of this letter of your intention
to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within twenty-five (25)
days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to
withhold such information.
If your receipt of this letter has been
t
-
I[I
'D
\\
~"
8202190333 820205
PDR ADOCK 05000373
a
FDR
i
_
.
. . .
Commonwealth Edison Company
~-2-
-
p8$.
.k
g
u
- delayed such' that less than seven'(7) days are _available for your review,
_
please notify this office promptly=so that a new due date may be estab-
lished. Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application'must
be accompanied by an affidavit executed by.theLowner of the information
which identifies the document or_ partL sought. to be withheld, and which
contains a full statement of the reasons which-are the bases for the
' claim that the information should be withheld from rublic disclosure.
This section further requires the statement to address with specificity
the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The information sought
to be withheld shall be incorporated as far.as possible into a separate
part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you.in this regard within
the specified periods noted above, a copy of this letter, .the enclosures,
and your response to this letter will be placed in the Public Document
Room.
The responses directed by this letter (and the accompanying Notice)-are-
not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and
Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
$L
C. E. Norelius, Director
Division of Engineering and
Technical Inspection
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix, Notice
of Violation-
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-373/82-02
cc w/encls:
Louis 0. De1 George, Director
of Nuclear Licensing
R. Cosaro, Site Construction
Superintendent-
i.
T. E. Quaka, Quality
'
Assurance Supervisor
R. H. Holyoak, Station
Superintendent
- B. B. S_tephenson, Project _ Manager
DMB/Doctaent Control Desk-(RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII'
Mary Jo Murray, Office of
Assistant Attorney General
RIII
RIII.
RIII.
RIII
RIII
RIII
RII
'
f)Y
[#f
qty .brH/
W^-
.
L
bury /dm M
fR
JackitV
Knop
ittle
Norelius
k eimann
1/29/82