|
---|
Category:AFFIDAVITS
MONTHYEARML20078C2271983-09-0202 September 1983 Application for Withholding Proprietary McGuire Post-Mod Steam Generator Tube Vibration Monitoring Program, (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML19347D9811981-04-0303 April 1981 Affidavit Re Temp Effects on Polyurethane Foam.If Fiberglass Insulation on Air Handling Ducts Is Considered,Calculations Would Be More Conservative.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20126H3021981-03-27027 March 1981 Affidavit Supplementing 810319 Testimony Re Polyurethane Problem ML19345E8481981-02-0202 February 1981 Affidavit Discussing Potential Changes in Population Density Figures at Any Radial Distance Up to 30 Miles from Plant ML19340C5011980-11-0707 November 1980 Affidavit Re 801007 Meeting W/R Tedesco in Charlotte,Nc. Discussion Addressed Computer Models for Decay Heat,Timing of Hydrogen Generation & Most Relevant Computer Study Finding.Affirmation of Svc Encl ML20040E3281980-09-0505 September 1980 Affidavit of RA Wiesemann Re Need to Withhold Encl Documents from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790 ML19329G1101980-07-0909 July 1980 Affidavit Attesting That ECCS Meets Acceptance Criteria. Hydrogen Explosion Will Not Present Major Damage to Reactor Vessel.Charlotte Observer 791101 Article & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19329G1061979-07-0909 July 1979 Affidavit Addressing Issue of Hydrogen Generation & Control Following Postulated TMI-type Accident.Action Implemented Effectively Precludes Excess Hydrogen Generation ML19331E0021979-07-0909 July 1979 Affidavit Re Hydrogen Generation & Control Following Postulated TMI-type Accident.Util Action Effectively Precludes Excess Hydrogen Generation.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19317E6341973-09-30030 September 1973 Affidavit of Tk Golden on 730930 Re Production of EPIC Subpoenaed Documents Listed in App A,Item 11 of Util 730516 Statement.Documents Not Yet Received.Certificates of Svc Encl ML19322B9121973-06-18018 June 1973 Affidavit of Sh Smith on 730618 Re Extent of Document Review Performed by Util ML19312C5701973-06-15015 June 1973 Affidavit of s Ragone on 730615 Re Extent of Document Review Performed by Util ML19317E5391973-04-12012 April 1973 Affidavit of s Ragone on 730412 Re 730322 Order & Supporting Motion to Quash or Limit 721120 Subpoena ML19317E7581973-04-11011 April 1973 Affidavit of Jh Fowles on 730411 Re Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum to Sc Electric & Gas Co.Certificate of Svc Encl 1983-09-02
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20212D1771999-09-20020 September 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50,App A,General Design Criterion 57 Re Isolation of Main Steam Branch Lines Penetrating Containment ML20210K7351997-08-18018 August 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-licensed Activities (Effective Immediately).Rj Nelson Prohibited for 1 Yr from Date of Order from Engaging in or Exercising Control Over Individuals Engaged in NRC-licensed Activities TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20044G7371993-05-25025 May 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rule ML20101R5931992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Opposes Rule ML20147F3231988-03-0303 March 1988 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $100,000 within 30 Days of Order Date ML20214F4411987-04-24024 April 1987 Endorsements 35 & 36 to Maelu Policy MF-101 & Endorsements 43 & 44 Nelia Policy NF-248 ML20203N3261986-09-19019 September 1986 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 ML20133P9591985-07-26026 July 1985 Unexecuted Amend 8 to Indemnity Agreement B-83,modifying Definition of Radioactive Matl as Listed ML20127G4261985-06-21021 June 1985 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 for Violations Noted During Special Safety Insp on 841102-03 Re Failure of Upper Head Injection Accumulator Sys Isolation Valves to Close at Required Water Level ML20078C2271983-09-0202 September 1983 Application for Withholding Proprietary McGuire Post-Mod Steam Generator Tube Vibration Monitoring Program, (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20054M1881982-07-0808 July 1982 Order Extending Time Until 820715 for Commission to Determine Whether to Review ALAB-669 ML20054L2941982-07-0101 July 1982 Order Extending Time Until 820708 for Commission to Determine Whether to Review ALAB-669 ML20054J1601982-06-24024 June 1982 Order Extending Time Until 820701 for Commission to Review ALAB-669 ML20054G2071982-06-17017 June 1982 Order Extending Time Until 820624 for Commission to Determine Whether to Review ALAB-669 ML20054F5341982-06-10010 June 1982 Order Extending Time Until 820617 for Commission to Decide Whether to Review ALAB-669 ML20140B5981981-09-10010 September 1981 Transcript of 810910 OL Hearing in Bethesda,Md Re Carolina Environ Study Group Appeal from Alab 790418 Initial Decision & 810526 Supplemental Initial Decision.Pp 1-195 ML20010C0881981-08-17017 August 1981 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20004F4851981-06-16016 June 1981 Answer Opposing Carolina Environ Study Group 810606 Request to Stay ASLB 810419 & 0526 Decisions.Util Compliance W/Regulations Entitles ASLB to Find Facility Can Be Operated W/O Undue Risk to Public Health.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20004F0131981-06-0808 June 1981 Exceptions to ASLB 810526 Supplemental Initial Decision & 790418 Initial Decision.Aslb Erred in Rejecting Jl Riley Evidence as Expert Witness & Decision That Riley Affidavit Not Responsive.Affidavit of Suc Encl ML20004D4161981-06-0505 June 1981 Request for Stay of Initial & Supplemental Initial Decisions.Commission Should Refer Decisions to ASLAP for Review.Potential for Irreparable Harm Due to Serve Hydrogen Explosion Is Great.Affirmation of Svc Encl ML20004D4231981-06-0505 June 1981 Request for Stay of Initial & Supplemental Initial Decisions.Aslb Lacks Basis for Finding Operation Would Not Expose Public to Undue Risk Since Board Did Not Determine Consequences of Shell Rupture.Affirmation of Svc Encl ML20004C8571981-06-0101 June 1981 Response in Opposition to Carolina Environ Study Group 810515 Motion to Permit Appeal of ASLB 810506 Order Denying Util Request for 35% Power Operations.Party May Not Appeal Favorable Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003G6701981-04-20020 April 1981 Addenda & Corrigendum to Carolina Environ Study Group 810414 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law ML19343D3451981-04-17017 April 1981 Response Opposing Applicant Request for Waiver,Exception or Exemption from 10CFR2,App B.No Special Circumstances Exist to Waive Procedures ML19345G9021981-04-17017 April 1981 Response in Opposition to Carolina Environ Study Group 810402 Motion Questioning Util 810324 Request for OL for 35% Power level.TMI-type Accident Is Not Credible.Proposed Order & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19347E2921981-04-14014 April 1981 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Supplemental Initial Decision Re Accident Credibility, Hydrogen Generation,Operational Aspects & Hydrogen Combustion.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19347D9171981-04-0909 April 1981 Response in Opposition to Carolina Environ Study Group 810406 Request for Extension to File Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Applicant Transcripts Available to Intervenors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19347D9731981-04-0808 April 1981 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19350D2471981-04-0606 April 1981 Request for 10-day Extension to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Counsel Occupied W/Other Cases. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19343D1461981-04-0606 April 1981 Response Opposing Carolina Environ Study Group 810302 Request for Certification or Referral.Request Unnecessary Since Commission Has Specifically Addressed Issue. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19347D9791981-04-0303 April 1981 Response to Jl Riley 810327 Affidavit Re Polyurethane Pyrolysis in Form of Encl Wh Rasin Affidavit ML19347D9761981-04-0303 April 1981 Response Opposing Applicant 810327 Submittal of Jl Riley Affidavit & Affirmation of Svc.Filing Is Contrary to ASLB Ruling.Record Is Closed & Filing Is Not Responsive ML19347D9811981-04-0303 April 1981 Affidavit Re Temp Effects on Polyurethane Foam.If Fiberglass Insulation on Air Handling Ducts Is Considered,Calculations Would Be More Conservative.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19350D2501981-04-0202 April 1981 Reply Opposing Applicant 810324 Motion for License Authorizing Up to 35% Rated Power Operation.Alleged Need to Bolster Util Summer Reserve Is Result of Scheduling Oconee 1 Maint During Summer Peak.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126H3021981-03-27027 March 1981 Affidavit Supplementing 810319 Testimony Re Polyurethane Problem ML19347D7811981-03-24024 March 1981 Request for License Authorizing Operation Up to & Including 35% Rated Power.Fuel Loading,Initial Criticality & Zero Power Physics Testing to Be Completed by 810515.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19341D4501981-03-0202 March 1981 Response in Objection to ASLB 810217 Memorandum & Order Denying Admission of Contentions 5 & 6.Supplementary EIS on Class 9 Accident Is Necessary Predicate in Proceeding.Denial Should Be Certified to Commission.W/Certificate of Svc ML19350B7511981-02-26026 February 1981 Carolina Environ Study Group Application for Subpoenas Re Reopened McGuire Units 1 & 2 OL Proceeding.List of Proposed Witnesses & Questions Encl.Related Correspondence ML20003C1631981-02-17017 February 1981 Testimony Re Hydrogen Generation,Combustion & Containment Response,To Be Presented Re Contentions 1 & 2.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20003C3391981-02-15015 February 1981 Summary of Proposed Testimony Re Contentions 3 & 4 on Adequacy of Emergency Evacuation Plan.Related Correspondence ML19339C9141981-02-0909 February 1981 Testimony Explaining Significant Events Leading to & Quantifying Amount of Hydrogen Produced During TMI-2 Accident.Accident Analysis & Prof Qualifications Encl ML19339C9261981-02-0909 February 1981 Testimony Describing Util Emergency Plans Re Actions to Be Taken W/Respect to Notification of Unusual Event,Alert,Site Area Emergency or General Emergency Conditions.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19339C9161981-02-0909 February 1981 Testimony Re Actions of Operator Assuming Improper Termination of ECCs During TMI-type Accident.Operators Trained in Revised Emergency Procedures to Diagnose & Evaluate Events.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19339C9251981-02-0909 February 1981 Testimony Delineating Analyses & Associated Physical Process Re Hydrogen Ignition & Burning.Facility,Drawings,Specs & Other Matl Examined & Analyzed.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19339C9221981-02-0909 February 1981 Testimony Re Methodology Used in Performing Analysis of Ultimate Capability of Facility Containment Vessel.Analysis of Finite Element Model Performed on One Quarter of Panel Bounded by Longitudinal & Meridional Stiffeners ML19339C9211981-02-0909 February 1981 Testimony Re Methodology Used in Performing Analysis of Ultimate Capability of Facility Containment Vessel to Withstand Pressures Similar to TMI-type Accident.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19339C9151981-02-0909 February 1981 Testimony Re Facility Measures Taken Subsequent to TMI Accident in Areas of Personnel,Equipment,Procedures & Training to Preclude Improper Operator Termination of Eccs.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19339C9201981-02-0909 February 1981 Testimony Re Purpose,Components & Operation of Distributed Ignition Hydrogen Mitigation Sys Installed at Facility.Sys Will Ignite Small Quantities of Hydrogen,Preventing Large Quantities from Burning.W/Prof Qualifications ML19339C9191981-02-0909 February 1981 Testimony Identifying & Describing Sys in Facility Containment Able to Mitigate Effects of Excessive Hydrogen Generation Resulting from TMI-type Accident.Prof Qualifications Encl 1999-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
-- -
AW-80-53
\
AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF PEilNSYLVANIA:
ss COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY:
~
.Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Robert A. Wiesemann, who, being by me duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is authorized to execute this Affidavit on behalf of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (" Westinghouse") and that the averments of fact set forth in this Affidavit are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief:
/
6 L'04. [,lUlf//[StfAL Robert A. Wiesemann, Manager Regulatory and Legislative Affairs Sworn to and subscribed before me this I day of ulen 1980.
/
4 lt U LG&An GE,&s>1rn
/ Notary Ptiblic 8202040187 820129 PDR ADOCK 05000369 P PDR
l ,
AW-80-53 (1) I am Manager of Regulatory and Legislative Affairs in the Nuclear Technology Division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and as such, I have been specifically delegated the function of reviewing the proprietary information sought to be withheld from public dis-closure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing or rule-making proceedings, and am authorized to apply for its withholding on behalf of the Westinghouse Water Reactor Divisions.
(2) I am making this Affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations and in conjunc-tion with the Westinghouse application for withholding accompanying this Affidavit.
(3) I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems in designating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial 'or financial information.
(4) Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for con-sideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld.
(1) The information sought to be withheld from public dis- -
closure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.
(ii) The information is of a type customarily held in confi-dence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis fo- determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in
. T
- AW-80-53 confidence. The application of that system and the sub-stance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required.
Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:
. (a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse consti-tutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
(b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.
(c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive ~ position in' the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, a.ssur-ance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
(d) It reveals cost or price information, production capac-ities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.
(e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded develorrent plans and programs of potential corrercial value to Westinghouse.
. T -
~
i i AW-80-53 1
(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent pro-tection may be desirable. s (g) It is not the property of Westinghouse, but must be treated as proprietary by Westinghouse according to agreements with the owner.
There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following:
(a) The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitors.
It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position.
(b) It is information which is marketable in many ways.
The extent to which such information is available to-competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information.
(c) Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense.
(d) Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage. If competitors acquire components of proprietary informa-tion, any one component may be the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage.
~j l AW-80-53 (e) Unrestricted disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition in those countries.
(f) The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage.
(11.1) The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.
(iv) The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources to the best of our knowledge and belief.
(v) The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is appropriately marked SE-SP-40(80)
" Southern California Edison Repair Report" (Proprietary).
This report has been prepared for and is being submitted to the Staff at the request of Southern California Edison.
The report details the design of the sleeves that are to be l
installed in the San Onofre Unit 1 steam generators. The report also includes the design analysis, the test verifica-tion program and descriptions of the expanded mechanical plug, the rolled plug and the channel head decontamination '
! process.
1 This information is part of that which will enable Westinghouse to:
(a) Apply for patent protection.
l
- O . t l AW-80-53 (b) Optimize steam generator repair techniques to extend the service life of steam generators.
(c) Assist its customers to obtain NRC approval.
4 (d) Justify the design basis for the steam generator repairs and installation methods.
Further, this information has substantial commercial value as follows:
(a) Westinghouse plans to sell the repair techniques and equipment described in part by the information.
(b) Westinghouse can sell repair services based upon the j
experience gained and the installation equipment and methods developed.
i Public disclosure of this infarmation is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse because (1) it would result in the loss of valuable patent rights, and (2) it would enhance the ability of competitors to design, manufacture, verify and sell steam generator repair techniques for commercial power reactors without '
commensurate expenses.
The development of tha methods and equipment described in ,
part by the information is the result of applying the results
.of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse effort and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.
..4 .
7- AW-80-53 In order for competitors of Westinghouse to duplicate this information,'similcr engineering programs would have to be ,
performed and a significant manpower effort, having the ,
requisite talent and experience, would have to be expended for steam generator repair techniques.
Further the deponent sayeth not.
G
/
i
-~ -
.m._.___.__-._}}