ML20040E085
| ML20040E085 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/16/1981 |
| From: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| References | |
| ACRS-1903, NUDOCS 8202030090 | |
| Download: ML20040E085 (18) | |
Text
P A7C/?S - / 963 p % C"~ ~~ [
f'D/:'
/- /9-6 &
3
,)
?
2
.. SUE DATE:
11/16/81 ufJ e-g a.
3 4y
'] j ~3 g
5 L
CERTIFIED: 11/21/81 h,N c,
MINUTES OF THE ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING g 21 1981 ON SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 1 3ASHINGTON, DC SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 The Shoreham Nuclear Power Station ACRS Subcommittee held a meeting on September 30, 1981 in Room 1046, 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
The purpose of the meeting was to review and discuss the various matters relating to the applict. tion of Long Island Lighting Company for a license to operate Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Unit 1.
The entire meeting was open to the public.
Notice of this meeting was published in the Federal Register on Monday, September 14, 1981.
A copy of this notice is included as Attachment A.
A list of attendees for this meeting is included as Attachment B, the schedule for the meeting is included as Attachment C, and a list of all reference material for this meeting is included as Attachment D.
A complete set of handouts has been included in the ACRS Files.
There were not written or oral statements from the public. The Designated Federal Employee for this meeting was Mr. John C. McKinley.
SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRMAN'S OPENING REMARKS g
M. Bender opened the meeting with a brief statement on the purpose and goal oxo of the meeting.
He asked the Applicant to prepared a summary of Shoreham's
$8 Industrial Security Program.
Dr. I. Catton requested that the Applicant 8
address BWR scram system pipe breaks.
m C
h LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY INTRODUCTION Mr. W. Museler of Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) provided a brief description of the Shoreham site and plant. This description included a comparison of Shoreham to plants with similar designs.
During this E"'Y Q L,
l
..J
,3 b
Ei
11/16/81 MINUTES SHOREHr.M 9/30/81 presentation, Dr. Zudans inquired as to the reactor building's susceptibility to damage from tornado and htericane loads.
He was told that a tornado might cause limited damage to the reactor building roof but that the containment steel liner would remain intact. Mr. Museler provided the Subcommittee with LILC0's schedule to support a planned September 1982 fuel load date.
The schedule addressed construction, startup, licensing, and training.
Corporate Organization and Technical Resources:
Mr. M. Pollock, LILCO Vice President Nuclear, stated LILCO's and his personal commitment to the safe and reliable operation of Shoreham. He described, in detail, the corporate organization and technical resources at Shoreham.
He identified the experience which each corporate manager posseses and noted how that experience was being supplemented, as necessary, by contractor and LILC0 experience.
Mr. Pollock discussed staffing in support of Shoreham (90% complete).
He then outlined the various review and audit bodies which will advise senior LILCO manage-ment. Mr. Bender asked LILCO how it determined the technical expertise required by its managers.
Mr. D. Binder of LILCO responded that NUREG-0731 and an industry survey were used to determine this for Shoreham managers.
The need for technically trained personnel capable of performing fuel behavior and transient analyses was discussed. Dr. Catton noted that none of LILCO's safety review groups report, on a regular basis, to a LILCO manager above the Vice President Nuclear. Dr. Zudans inquired as to the com-position of and procedures to be followed by the various safety review groups.
11/16/81
~
MINUTES 3RURERAM 9/30/81 The review groups composition and procedures have not yet been finalized.
LILCO agreed to provide Mr. Bender with a copy 'of the draft Nuclear Review Board charter.
Nuclear Station Organization:
Mr. J. Rivel10 of LILCO discussed Shoreham's Nuclear Station Organiza-tion, including the onsite safety review group (Review of Operations Committee).
He detailed Shoreham's current and projected (core load) staffing levels. The areas where contractor support is used was speci-fied. The nembers of onsite personnel supporting Shoreham compare favorably with those employed at similar power reactors.
Most of the experience that Shoreham's operators have was acquired either through the nuclear Navy or through Shoreham's construction and training pro-grams.
However, Shoreham operators have received significant training at commercial BWRs with similar designs. Dr. Catton identified training as not having a prominent position in the station organization.
NRC STAFF INTRODUCTION, Mr. J. Wilson, the NRC's licensing Project Manager for Shoreham, sum-marized the status of the NRC review. Each of the remaining seventeen open items was addressed.
Significant licensing conditions imposed on the Applicant include the requirement for LILCO to have experienced -
contractor support to assist Shoreham managers until the managers have
11/16/81 MINUTES 3RDRERAM 9/30/81 acquired adequate operating experience.. LILCO is also being required to perform a study to confirm that the local power range monitor assemblies are at the most suitable location to detect inadequate core cooling.
The study should propose:
no action, alternate average power range monitor assembly locations, or the need for thermocouples at specified locations.
As a result of the Subcommittee's discussions with the NRC Staff and Applicant, the following observations were made:
The Staff has no specific requirement concerning the corporate stature of the training functions within an applicant's o;'ganization.
The Staff has no specific standards for judging the adequacy of an applicant's technical resources.
The containment isolation dependability (e.g., valves for purging Shoreham's inerted containment) may not have been adequately reviewed.
~
The qualification of air-operated valves within containment needs to be further evaluated by both the Staff and the Applicant.
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY PRESENTATION AND NRC STAFF COMMENTS Mr. B.
McCaffrey of LILCO discussed several Engineering and Licensing areas relevant to the Shoreham OL review.
Included in his discussion was LILCO's response to the SER open items, a description of the con-trol room, and brief presentations on station electric power, containment, I
l
11/16/81 MINUTES 5HURERAM 9/30/81 the potential for flooding from sources internal to the containment, anticipated transients without scram, and water chemistry control.
Plant Control Room:
During the presentation on the plant control room, Shoreham's alternate shutdown panel was discussed.
Shoreham's remote shutdown capabilities allow the plant to be taken to the cold shutdown condition.
- However, only one train of shutdown systems is available at the panel.
Station Electric Power:
During the discussion of station electric power, LILCO committed to conducting a station blackout test if a generic station blackout test was not acceptable to the NRC Staff.
Containment:
As part of the containment discussion, Mr. Bender urged the Staff and the Applicant to identify and comply with new environmental qualification of electrical equipment rules and regulatory guides prior to Shoreham initial critical ity.
Mr. J. Rivello of LILC0 discussed Shoreham's containment inerting system design and the constraints which inerting impose on plant operations.
LILCO stated that inerting limited their access to important plant equip-ment and that it prolonged the assessment of unidentified leakage within containment. The necessity for completing a reactor shutdown once de-inerting is commenced to correct a within-containment problem was dis-cussed.
l
a 11/16/81 MINUTES IHURERXM 9/30/81 Water Chemistry Control:
Dr. Catton had LILC0 discuss their ability to detect condensate demineralizer resin carryover. LILCO stated that personnel in the manned Radwaste Contro' Room would detect such an occurrence via a high dp across a condensate system filter. Mr. Bender asked LILC0 to provide him with a written summary of BWR experiences regarding chloride in-leakage through the main condenser and what Shoreham would do if their condensate demineralizer was overloaded with chlorides.
Probabilistic Risk Assessment:
Mr. D. Einder of LILCO discussed Shoreham's self-motivated effort to use probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) techniques for an independent plant design assessment.
LILC0 is attempting to determine, from a pr;bability of occurrence point of view, which internal accident sequences dominate risk to the general public. LILC0 is using the MARCH and CORRAL codes and the CRACIT ex-plant consequence model. Dr. Catton recommended that LILCO review the Brookhaven critical report on the MARCH code.
PRA will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Shoreham area evacuation pl an.
Drs. Catton and Zudans stressed the need for LILC0 to firm up its PRA data base development.
Training and Qualification Programs:
Mr. J. Rivello made presentations on Shoreham's Training and Qualiff-cations Programs and on Shoreham's decay heat removal capabilities.
He detailed the training and experience that LILCO has provided to its plant staff.
He showed how Shoreham's training efforts have exceeded
11/16/81 MINUTES SHOREHAM 9/30/81 s
the regulatory requirements and guidance.
However, Shoreham has a very limited, contractor run, training staff (Nuclear Utilities Service, Training Corporation).
The NRC Staff is requiring, as a license condition, that LILC0's training instructors be LILC0 employees within six months.
LILCO voiced its objection to this license condition.
Shoreham's training program is based on a crew training concept.
Shoreham's training program stresses procedural compliance during accident conditions more than the potential consequence of the accident.
Mr. Bender questioned whether Shoreham ade-quately incorporated maintenance controls and ALARA into its training program.
Dr. Catton questioned the qualification of Shoreham's training supervisor.
NUSTC agreed to provide Mr. Bender with a brochure outlining its training capabilities.
Emergency Planning:
Mr. C. Davario of LILCO discussed emergency planning at Shoreham.
He described LILC0's facilities relating to emergency preparedness and outlined LILCO's cooperative role with FEMA, State (New York state coordinates with Connecticut, as necessary), and local agencies.
Industrial Security:
Mr. B. Steiger of LILCO made a brief presentation on industrial security at Shoreham.
Shoreham utilizes a computerized access system which is combined with the plant's fire protection system. Mr. Steiger stated that a vital area analysis was conducted at Shoreham and that this analysis is consistent with
31/16/81 MINUTES SHOREHAM 9/30/81 NRC requirements.
Contractor personnel are employed to perform the security guard functions. Mr. Steiger stated that all Shoreham plant personnel re-ceived psychological screening prior to snployment.
SUBCOMMITTEE CONCLUSION AND FUTURE MEETINGS:
The Subcommittee concluded that, based on the information they had heard, the Shoreham application for an operating license was ready to be reviewed by the full ACRS.
Mr. Bender outlined an agenda for the full Committee meeting,. scheduled for October 15, 1981 in Washington, D.C.
NOTE:
For additional details, a complete transcript of the meeting is available in the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H St., NW, Washington, DC 20555 or from Alderson Reporters, 300 7th St., SW, Washington, DC, (202) 554-2345.
~
.w
.>.8
,a..
m, w
..,...:sr
- a...
a,..
.. : >. o, s.
4/ -
j 4
Federal Register / Vol. 46. No.177 / Monday. September 14. 1981 / Notices 45714 Lins Co
- y. Civil Action No. CTV 81-arrscTivt oATE: July 1.1981.
sessicns which wu! be closed to protect Proprietary information (Sunshine Act 3
C-4004 ha enlodged with the District rom rumtmm twomuATio*s cowfACT:
Exemption 4). One or more closed thel Court for.he Northern District of Ira B. Kirschbaum. Assistant General Illinois.ne proposed decree requires Counsel. Bureau of Prisons. U.S.
sessions mr y be necessary to discuse g,, <
such information.To the extent Phillips Petroleum Company and PhiEps Department of justice. 320 First Street, Practicable, these closed sessions wiu py, !
i anc Pipe une Company to comply with N.W., Washington D.C 20534 (202-724-be held so as to minimlre inconvenience
,, a applicable organic material emission 3062).
to members of the public in attendance.
by I hmitations at their asoline loading rack gyp,ggggugy,,po, yay,,,e gj, ne a ends for subject meeting shall l
a r.<
t:rminals in Kanka ee. East St. Louis, order la not a rule within the meaning of be as fo lows:
%) 3 end Forsyth. Illinois: East Chicago, the AdministrativeProcedure Act.5 Sa!
Inditna; and Columbus, Ohio. The U.S.C. 551(4), the Regulatory flexibility wednnday.septembe as, test da.t dxcree also requires that Philhps Act. 5 U.S C 601(2). or Executive Order AJO o.at until the conclusion of busir.ess g
Petroleum pay a civil penalty of $5.000 No 12291' Set 1(a)
During the inittal portion of the meeting the rnd Phillips Pipe une a civil penalty of By virtue of the authority vested in me as Attorney General by 18 USC 4001,
%u ato th enyj
eeS in i y
proposed decree me be cxemined at the OfSce of the United 4003. 4081. 4082. Attorney General Order exchange pnuminary viewe ressrd.ns No. 645-76, es amended,is further metters to be considend durins the blance States Attorney. Room 1500 South. 219 amended as foUows:
d the meeting.
I*I
"'E S. Dearbom Street. Chicago. Ulinois (1)In Subparagraph A.by adding Ik Subcommittee wiD thC ea.r in c 00c04 at the Region V Office of the United States Penitentiary. lempoc.
.,nis9 ens by and hold d%.selons with f
Environmental Protection Agency.
Cahfomla representstus of the Img Island Ushtina er Enforcement Division. 230 South (2)In Subparagraph B.by deleting Company NRt.'T'aff, their consultants. and de Denborn Street. Chicago. Ulinois 60604.
Federal Correctional 1nstitution.
other internted genons ress: ding this Cc.
cnd at the Environmental Enforcement Lompoc. Cahfornia; and review.
da' Section. Land and Natural Resources (3)1n Subparagraph C by delet
,g g
Division of the Department of justice.
Federal Prison Camp. McNet!Islan to be discussed, whether the meeting g")'
Room 12.54. Washington. D.C 20530. A has been canceUed or rescheduled, the p
copy of the proposed consent decree Dated. September 2.1981-mty be obtained in person or by mail Wallam French Smith.
Chairman's ruling on requests for the y
from the Environmental Enforcement Attorney Genemf.
opportunity to present oral statements Gj and the time allotted therefor can be t
Section. Land and Natural Resources p o. n-ans.e r. a e-um. nes I obtained by a prepaid telephone call to B'.'
Division of the Department of justice.
eau.o coes me w ne ficpartment of justice will receive the cognizant Staff Engineer.Mr. David S.'
C Fischer (telephone 202/634-14141 A*
written comments relating to the
~~ - -
proposed judgment until October 14, NUCLEAR REGULATORY between 8.15 a.m. and 500 p.m. EDT.
i ne Designated Federal Employee for R
1981. Comments should be addressed to,
COMMISSION the Assintant Attomey Generalof the this meeting is Mr. John C McKinley.
Dk Land and Natural Resources Division.
Advisory Committee oh Reacto' I have determined in accordance with Prc Department of justice. Washington. D.C Safeguarda, Subcommittee on Subsection 10(d)of the Federal t
20530.ne comments should refer to Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Unit Advisory Committee Act that it may be UnitedStates v.Phillips Pipe Eme 1; Meeting necessary to class portions of this I
ne ACRS Subcommittee on meeting to public attendance to protect n 'nt of justice reference number Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Unit t reprietary information.ne authority d sho di e de the will hold a meeting on September 30.
or such closure is Exemption (4) to the
,g Depa e
9W 408.
1981. Room 1046 at 1717 H Street. NW.
Sunshine Act. S U.S.C 552b(c)(4).
(
ashington. DC The Subcommittu wiH Deted. September s.1981 A
ran ey Genemi.Landand discus: the long Island ughting g,g NaturalResourcee Division.
ue pe Adrisory Committee Manageaient 0$cer.
p f
p Da sbanco rud ku-eue es4 g,
g{
gting 3D""-'*""*'"**3 I
published Auguet 21.
s e acoot neo.e w pd In accordance with the procedures Al outlined in the Federal Register on (S
(Order No.954-411 October 7.1900. (45 FR 66535), oral or (Docket No. W2Cl Ur Modification to Ust of Bureau of written statements may be presented by O
Prisions Institutions members of the ublic, recordings will Metropolitan Edison Co, et al.;
S<
ACENcir: Department of justice.
be permitted o during those portions Granting of Re!!ef From Appendix J of the muting w en a transcript is being Requirements AcTiosc Notice, kept, and questions may be asked only
- g. l suuuAmr. Attorney General Order No.
by members of the Subcommittee.its ne Nuclear Regu! story Commissloo f ;'
648-76 (41 FR 14805), as amended, consultants, and Staff. Persons destring (the Commission) has granted relief classifies and lists the various Bureau of to make oral statements should notify from certain requirements of Appendix }.
g, Prisons institutions.nis order modifies the Designated Federal Employee as far to to CFR Part 50 ** Primary Reactae y.
the list by deleting McNeillsland.
in advance as practicable so that Containment leakage Testing for c
Washington as a Federal Prison Camp appropriate anangements can be made Water Cooled Power Reactors", to b
and redesignating the Federal to allow the necessary time during the Metropolitan Edison Con pany, Jersey p
Correctionalinstitution, lampoc.
meeting for such statements.
Central Power and Light Company, and i
California as U.S. Penitentiary, tempoc.
De entire meeting will be open to Pennsylvania Electric Company.The e
Cahfornia.
public ettendance except for those relief relates to the leakage testing ATTAC.a M E NT "A"
l SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 MEETING DATE:
SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING: _ SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 1 LOCATION:
WASHINGTON, DC -- ROOM 1046 w
e ATTA t% h t.4 T E ATTENDANCE LIST R4 EASE TRT N T NAME AFFILI ATION 3,
M Q9xb5 L c MA.R &
2, 7
QAi AhM/
M w A *i '
st{g 3,
t m /ts (c J5-sT & T g
y
( 4tn.-y u a co s'.~144 T s
po AC
O"'I^'"
6, 7
7uDANS T> "
7.
a m~u 4 ACA5 CTAI' g,
T) ff $64<z O b Q.,,, e wst Vit 'hN o-N/?N
~
10.
11.
Ns JA 2 0
- SC jp,
"._f('. /-///.,G /N 5 I E lD bI
_ _13.
c A h e rc, ',
L /cc o i,
,s, Cn R niC C Ar-& N Y' L'LC O is. l.0 4 hICStIVA~
UDb 0
- 17. Wl Os i o6x _
2rvello ArAco
,s.
a
- 3. L. %',%
LILC s 39.
- q. uruMO 5 SdW 20.
.M.L.Mlele
/ !L C O 11.
l22. c.).4.AlorAfo lit co es.
A'. T
/%c.lc u hm% + M$s w s /U ' ' ('
/
n
% T #1 var H Y
& Tht / WHs7tR
SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 MEETING DATE:
SUBTMITTEEMEETING: _ SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 1 WASHINGTON. DC -- ROOM 1046 LOCATION: _
ATTENDANCE LIST A' EASE TRI N T AFFItIATIOR _
'E Spri7ta W2:izx ros 6er>.
u r
, '. Sca c
Anw.wy F.fM.-
- /
H:w~t./ 1- :/ //ii:.es r.
/
S*TM N 4 LOGEEha?
S 7 'fL 12 A i? D I 3.
g CA M.1 Ovr N S%ed D)c { ; l p e-S b c. 2 L J e M e
- 'T E Medc21f s.
$0NAU
///co 6.
t' (j(C()
- 7. d Ct4' E 'N$tW.at l~ / L l(,'
1
. ~ ' Jv
.f. /
p, (L /;.,.
as n
.-rw ss m u a e
L'itee Len C+L-e
,0.
/< h o s.m. Kxscs d A,U2 YEu M n.<3 L/z 6>
32.
33.
tap;'e s
$Ah!,J.SX, '
Asy S fugga 0-/(/L o
'/
Eo f3 rzAo n.ou
_ S ( 60 14.
,5, MICK A6 L H.
Mil.LtdM Litco Nur) A A)GERT LIL (o
,s.
17.
b u [Nfi'ISTOML'/2 6/20S6 l/L [ O II.HAAv-b urg LiLCO
,e.
as.
e.p KL ac L,L w Yf/nRacdF L / 4 (f C 20.
im p.
& e. Mwn d0. ff00/<'l10 fP4t
-22.
- n. L.c CRats ppdL 9 A~,,.
ig,m
SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 MEETING DATE:
SUB00MKITTEE MEETING: _ SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 1 LOCATION:
WASHINGTON, DC -- ROOM 1046 ATTENDANCE LIST AEASE TRI N T NAME AFFILIATIOR _
t D.
t-3, OL. Rsks
%4 Le 4 bik 4'o r.
S. 7~ lh a
);amn dwu f Ew-c.
3.
B.s. ? MimzzI
=ss:L %.,<L++ s-a 4 L, k co flor:ch Po n
- s. 3. M Og k e ne
- 6. 7h cl C SN < '
LtLCo
- 7. S an F.
E + t we s ler LILcC e, 3~~ ' i'
// : V/-?;
- u. C L i L (._.
/
w,,e i us a s b e e 72. Y smsinszet
,o. $.4. f A f?'
.67sv PA/&A./
h e4w<4de
- 11. R E Fort 4c
% e 2t.dsra A Jr.
T M
Ta c c. e>
J3. K. 5A. % %%%
WmE T wenc-en 4tNmoc fftscalc to.
io 3). :n RoBARE 1s. C L b w _%
Q e w /fr L G O c-O-
- 16. C. f4 -
3CAbO I
,, _ k ibf O
- 17. \\L' [. l $ W G '/
l /LCO O G RAn,/
5 O h(NA Lt.
NU.S TINwm!/;
18.
.19.
P,T S6 A A.iN1.- L L.
L /4.f0 Litco to.
M. S cuoffnpeue L
_21.
A, Al0 2 2 04 /4 d O L /A' C O L /4 C C >
_22.
V. T. R ce;c: o 13.
E. ~5 Younc.c,ss.
-f,eto G w aq.t7.A._l{A.q c u,c_ Q,
-k'E.
G-D E.R.S
' 8
SEPTEMBER 30, 1981
. MEET!NG DATE:
' SUB;0MMITTEE MEETING: _ SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 1 LOCATION:
WASHINGTON, DC -- ROOM 1046 l
ATTENDANCE LIST PLEASE
'PRI N T NM AFFILIATION -
Nuee.au Pseu.rcrs/u (ror toppss) 3.
D. J k c.cw ns M L / / / O s.- 1. O cs i.. % ) F,.ic,a 2;u c.
- ~
p.
(J C A/A C - D WF f - H'f f A
.nt/CE 7
s.
r /of m Tt,f+s vuwo'aWi/ega N A Nauwev U S N!' - M'll'elE0 /3 s.
es e nc -m /r>s ifrcs r<
d.L. % a-s.
- 7. R. L
)
os ac. - aan ehm. em.
~
C. 9 alt +
L
's.,
e.
J. M o wJ Lt tcc o
FP1L 10.
2 5HRTl M
11.
CMG Mo41 MAL IW
]?,
RoGM GoqD Dum5 GiuR ED'i
- > wt VM
_13.
Litc o Giu % %c5 ja, 35, HAuti R PNs N.t P.S. C.-
6RS 16.
ARmt4 JANNS Nm ^)
4550 65 17.
D r Gouw gun x LC.
A M Gd'J A550Cs 18, ffAa K J-Atustra R 20.
PJ HipsosJ 21.
- _22,
.23,
{
t REVISED 9/23/81 TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF PRESENTATIONS ACRS SUBCOMMITTE MEETING ON SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION WASHINGTON, DC SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 l
APPROXIMATE TIME SPEAKER I.
OPENING STATEMENT BY SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRMAN 8:30 a.m.
Mr. Bender II. LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY INTRODUCTION A.
Introduction 8:35 a.m.
W.J. Museler B.
Site and Plant Descripiton (including a comparison with similar design)
C.
Schedule for Completion of Licensing Review, Operator Training Qualification, Test Program, Fuel Load, and Operaticn D.
Opening Remarks 8:50 a.m.
M.S. Pollock E.
Compliance with NUREG-0731 - Management Structure and Technical Resources 1.
Corporate Organization and Technical Resources 2.
Nuclear Station Organization J. Rivello
- BREAK ********************
10:05 a.m.
III. NRC STAFF INTRODUCTION 10:15 a.m.
J. Wilson A.
Overview of OL Review B.
Status of SER Open Items and Significant License Conditions IV.
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY PRESENTATION AND NRC COMMENTS A.
Engineering and Licensing 10:30 a.m.
B.R. McCaffrey 1.
Response to SER Open Items 2.
Plant Control Room a.
Design Review (Human Factors, etc.)
b.
Alternate Shatdown Panel c.
Habitability for Serious Accidents l
g At%M2NT "C.
x 6
1 TENTATIVE SCHEDULE SHOREHA!4 REVISED 9/23/81 S:ptember 30, 1981 APPROXIMATE TIME SPEAKER 3.
Station Electric Power 11:15 a.m.
a.
Loss of AC/ Loss of DC b.
Station Blackout Analysis 4.
Containment 11:30 a.m.
a.
Mark II Owners Group Participation b.
Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Within Containment c.
Containment Inerting 1.
System Design
2.
Constraints on Operation J. Rivello LUNCH 12:00 noon 5.
Internal Flooding 1:00 p.m.
B.R. McCaffrey 6.
Anticipated Transients Without Scram 1:10 p.m.
7.
Water Chemistry Control 1:25 p.m.
8.
Probabilistic Risk Assessment and 1:35 p.m.
D.J. Binder Systems Interaction B.
Plant Operations 1:55 p.m.
J. Rivello 1.
Training and Qualification Programs l
a.
Selection and Training of Operators (including Use of Simulators and Other Plants to Provide Operator Experience) b.
Selection and Training of Maintenance Personnel c.
Onsite Technical Support Personnel Training d.
Offsite Support Personnel Training t
e.
Training in Mitigation of Core Damage f.
Changes Implemented Other Than TMI-2 Requirements (if any) g.
Anticipated Transients Without Scram 2.
Decay Heat Removal Capability Normal and Degraded Modes
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE 3
SHOREHAM REVISED 9/23/81 September 30, 1981 APPROXIMATE TIME SPEAKER C.
Emergency Planning 3:25 p.m.
C.A. Daverio 1.
Overview 2.
Role of FEMA, State, and Local Agencies 3.
Emergency Support Facilities D.
Industrial Security
.B.
Steiger V.
ACRS CAUCUS 4:15 p.m.
VI.
ACRS INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT AND NRC STAFF VII. ADJOURNMENT
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ON SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 1 SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 1.
Long Island Lighting Company, "Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 Final Safety Analysis Report," Volumes 1-15 and Amendments 1-39.
2.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) " Safety Evaluation Repcrt Related to the Operation of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit No.1," NUREG-0420, dated April 1981 and Supplement No.1 dated September 9, 1981.
3.
Letter, SNRC-534, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO), to Harold R. Denton, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR), NRC, transmitting additional infomation in response to NRC Staff questions regarding the local leakage test program for containment isolation valves from systems terminating in the sup-pression chamber, dated February 24, 1981.
4.
Letter, SNRC-557, J. P. Novarro, Project fianager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, regarding LILCO positions related to Post-TMI requirements outlined in NUREG-0737, dated April 15, 1981.
5.
Letter, SNRC-558, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting a proposed revision to Shoreham FSAR Chapter 13.1 and Appendix 13A, dated April 22, 1981.
6.
Letter, SNRC-563, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, regarding LILC0 positions related to Post-TMI requirements outlined in NUREG-0737, dated May 15, 1981.
7.
Letter, SNRC-564, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, regarding equipment dynamic qualification, SER Outstanding Issue No. 8, dated May 15, 1981.
8.
Letter, SNRC-566, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to outstanding issues regarding scram discharge, dated May 15, 1981.
9.
Letter, SNRC-568, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting Shoreham revised Emergency Plan, dated May-27, 1981.
- 10. Letter, SNRC-572, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's response to Outstanding Issue 45, Fire Protection, dated May 21, 1981.
11.
Letter, SNRC-575, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, regarding equipment dynamic qualification supplemental information, SER Outstanding Issue No. 8, dated May 28, 1981.
l 12.
Letter, SNRC-576, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
I Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, regarding equipment environmental quali-fication, SER Outstanding Issue No. 9, dated May 27, 1981.
17.
Letter, SNRC-577, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to SER out-standing issues regardir.g pool dynamic loads, and emergency procedures, dated May 27, 1981.
ATTAcn/tcar " V
-2
- 14. Letter, SNRC-578, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to SER out-standing issues, dated May 29, 1981.
- 15. Letter, SNRC-579, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, regarding LILCO positions related to Post-TMI requirements outlined in NUREG-0737, dated May 29, 1981.
- 16. Letter, SNRC-582, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to SER out-standing Issue No. 52 regarding management organization and responses to NRL Staff requests for additional information, dated June 15, 1981.
- 17. Letter, SNRC-586, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to SER out-standing issues and Post-TMI requirements, June 11, 1981.
18.
Letter, SNRC-598, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting additional infomation on con-tainment isolation dependability, dated July 17, 1981.
19.
Letter, SNRC-599, B. R. McCaffrey, Manager, LILCO, to Harold R. Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, regarding LILCO's responses to " Pilot Monitoring of Selected Emergency Procedures for Near-Term Operating License Applicants," Item I.C.8 of NUREG-0737, dated July 20, 1981.
20.
Letter, SNRC-601, B. R. McCaffrey, Manager, LILCO, to Harold R. Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to NRC Staff requests for additional information, dated July 21, 1981.
21.
Letter, SNRC-602, B. R. McCaffrey, Manager, LILCO, to Harold R. Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to NRC Staff requests for additional information, dated July 22, 1981.
- 22. Letter, SNRC-605, B. R. McCaffrey, Manager, LILCO, to Harold R. Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to NRC Staff requests for additional information, dated July 23, 1981.
- 23. Letter, SNRC-608, B. R. McCaffrey, Manager, LILCO, to Harold R. Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to NRC Staff requests
(
for additional infomation, dated July 31, 1981.
24.
Letter, SNRC-612, B. R. McCaffrey, Manager, LILCO, to Harold R. Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to NRC Staff requests for additional 'information, dated August 7,1981.
- 25. Letter, SNRC-614, B. R. McCaffrey, Manager, LILCO, to Harold R. Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting LILCO's responses to NRC Staff requests for additional information, dated August 18, 1981.
- 26. Letter, SNRC-539/540, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R.
Denton,, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting Shoreham Power Station Plant Design Assessment for SRV and LOCA Loads, Revision 4, dated February 1981.
- 27. Letter, SNRC-543 and SNRC-559, J. P. Novarro, Project Manager, LILCO, to Harold R. Denton, Director, NRR, NRC, transmitting Shoreham Power Station Preservice Inspection Plan, Revision 3, dated March 16, 1981 and May 12, 1981, respectively.
- 28. Design Criteria and Description, Technical Support Center (TSC) for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, SNRC-486, dated February 10, 1981.
- 29. Quality Assurance Program Plan for Inservice Inspection Program, Shoreham, SNRC-479, dated June 9,1980.
- 30. Viewgraphs used during the meeting (96 slides).
- 31. Project Status Report.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.