ML20040A467
| ML20040A467 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 12/29/1981 |
| From: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Hancock J FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8201210145 | |
| Download: ML20040A467 (2) | |
Text
.
T DEC 19 81 s
Docket ilo. 50-302 e-RECEgygn
{,0Ec3o 7gg,}
Florida Power Corporation
/ik?"ce
/
ATTri: Mr. John A. Ilancock G.
Toc Assistant Vice President fluclear Operations 4
t _.
P.O. Box 14042 - C-4 St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 Gentlena n:
Our letter dated June 5,1931, informed you that the April 10, 1981 exception taken by your company to the fee requirenents of 10 CFR 170.22 for the Crystal River Unit No. 3 ap? ication dated September 15, 1930 (Change Request tio. 64, Revision 1 -
l Lessons Learned) would be addressed in a separate letter. Based on a preliminary analysis of your application, the staff of tne Office of iluclear Reactor Regulation (OMRR) determined that this application would involve review of several separate safety issues which rescited in our February 12, 1931 request for the Class IV fee.
The April 10 letter took exception to this fee determination and stated that the application resulted from a Commission Confirmatory Order and is, therefore, exempt from fees, but if a fee is applicable at all, it should be a Class II fee ($1,200) rather than a Class IV fee (tl2,300). Your company determined that the Lessons Learned action was a prior action already addressed in a specific Safety Evaluation Report as well as in numerous other specific documents.
Unile Crystal River was one of those plants that received orders after the TMI-2 accident, wa nave been informed by the OMRR staff that your September 15 application resulted from tne Cornission's July 2,1930 letter tnat was sent to all operating power reactor licensees. Althougn there were significant USilRC general reviews and 6
documents associated witn the TMI accident before and after your application was filed, it is our understanding that these were not plant specific reviews. Therefore, tne responses to the July 2 letter had to be specifically reviewed in connection with the Crystal River facility. This final review of your application was completed on April 17, 1931, with the issuance of Amendment flo. 38 to OPR-72.
To assure tnat fees are consistently applied to the plant specific applications, the fee classes for aoplications relating to THI-2 Lessons Learned Technical Specifi-cations have undergone an overall review by 0lRR.
In this review, applications such as yours were reanalyzed. As a result of this reanalysis, it has now been determinep that a Class III fee, in lieu of the previously requested Class IV fee, is appro-priate for your Septe..Ler in ::pplication.
8201210145 811229 DR ADOCK 05000
m,n,j Q
.a Florida Power Corporation
-2 US 2 S 19 61 In consideration of the above, it is requested that your company remit a sum of
$4,000 to our office for your Septen.ber 15 application.
Sincerely, tu William O. Miller, Chief Licease Fee Management Branch Office of Administration DISTRIBUT10t{:
PDR LPDR Docket File /
PErickson, ORB-4 RIngram, ORB-4 LFMB Reactor File LFMB Pending Check File RMDiggs, LFMB LFMB R/F (2) 1 l
l l
\\mw OFFICE >
sunnme>..RMDi g.g s.,,'ml CJ,Hg,1,1,9w,ay,,,,
W,QJ;1il],er,,,
12/;}.3../81 12/ /81 12/T(/.81 oue>
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam mi-235.sm nne ronu aia oo.soj nacu om