ML20039E855

Proposed Figure 3.1-2, Operating Limit Max Critical Power Power Ratio Versus Tau.

ML20039E855
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	01/05/1982
From:	POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:
Shared Package
ML20039E854	List: ML20039E853 ML20039E855
References
NUDOCS 8201110549
Download: ML20039E855 (1)

Text

-~~- -

1 l

. = . . l POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Revised " Application for Amdendment to Operating License" regarding Reload 4/ Cycle 5.

REMOVE PAGE SUBSTITUTE PAGE(S) vli - (List of Figures) vii 47b - (Figure 3.1-2) 47b - (Figure 3.1-2a),

47c - (Figuru 3.1-2b),

47d - (Figure 3.1-2c) e 4

8201110549 820105 PDR P ADOCK 05000333 pgg

y . , = . . - . - . -

4 JAFNPP LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page I 1.1-1 APIN Flow Bias Scram Relationship to Normal Operating 23 i Conditions '

3.1-1 Manual Flow Control 47a 3.1-2a Operating Limit MCPR versusT For 8X8 Fuel Types 47b 3.1-2b Operating Limit MCPR versusT For 8X8R Fuel Types 47c 3.1-2c Operating Limit MCPR versusT For P8X8R Fuel Types 47d 4.1-1 Graphical Aid in the Selection of an Adequate Interval 48 Between Tests 4.2-1 Test Interval vs. Prnhability of System Unavailability 87 3.4-1 Sodium Pentaborate Solution Volume-Concentration 110 Requirements 3.4-2 Saturition Ttraperature of Sodium Pentaborate Solution

. 111 3.5-3 MAPUiGR Versus Planar Average Exposure 135a Reload 1, 8D274L 3.5-4 MAPulGR Versus Planar Average Exposure 135b Reload 1, 8D274H 3.5-5 MAPUiGR Versus Planar Average Exposure acload 2, 8DRB265L 135c 3.5-6 MAPUlGR Versus Planar Average Exposure Reload 2, BDRB283 135d 3.5-7 MAPUiGR Versus Planar Average Exposure Reload 3, P8DRB265L 135e 3.5-8 FMPUlGR Versus Planar Average Exposure Reload 3, P8DRB28 3 135f 3.5-9 MAPUlGR Versus Planar Average Exposure Reload 4,P8DRB284L 135g 3.5-10 MAPUIGR Versus Planar Average Exposure Reload 4,P8DRB299 135h 3.6-1 Beactor Vessel Thermal Pressurization Limitations 163 4.6-1 Chloride Stress Corrosion Test Resulte at 500*F 164 6.1-1 Management Organization Chart 259 6.2-1 Plant Staff Organization 260 A-sent no. A, yt, p(

vii

e FIGURE 3.1-2a Operating Limit MCPR Versus Y (Cection 4.1.E)

For 8x8 Fuel Types 1.40 ~

(1, 1.35) 1.35 -

2 -

y a

0 50 (1, 1.30) 4 1.30 - LO 9

0 '

1.25 -

goc 1 (0.692, 1.242) to (0, 1.23) BOC (0, 1. 21') -

1.21) 1.20 -

0 0'.1 0.2 0'. 3 0.4 0'. 5 0' . 6 0' . 7 d.8 d.9 k.0 t'

Option B T =0 Option A t' =l l

47b Amendment No.

l e... ,

1 FIGURE 3.1-2b Operating Limit MCPR Versus T (Section 4.1.E)

For 8X8R Fuel Types 1.40 -

'

• I-1.35 -

W E (1, 1.30)

"j 1.30 - 409 LO m i a

c -

sf 0

E o

50 (0.769, 1.256)

SOC (0, 1.23) 1.20 -

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Y

Option B t'=0 Option A t =l Ammendment No.

- .- 1

FIGURE 3.1-2c Operating Limit MCPR Versus T (Section 4.1.E)

For P8X8R Fuel Types 1.40 (1, 1.37) 1.35 -

(1, 1.34) 500 LO

$ 1.30 -

e .

.d b

a l' ~ E (0.600, 1.256)

'a t (0, 1.25) SOC u -

(0, 1.22) 1.20 -

1 I I I I I I I I l 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Option B T =0 Option A T =l Amendment No. 47d

. _ - . .