ML20039E855

Proposed Figure 3.1-2, Operating Limit Max Critical Power Power Ratio Versus Tau

ML20039E855
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	01/05/1982
From:	POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:
Shared Package
ML20039E854	List: ML20039E853 ML20039E855
References
NUDOCS 8201110549
Download: ML20039E855 (1)

Text

-~~- -

1

. =

POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK JAMES A.

FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Revised " Application for Amdendment to Operating License" regarding Reload 4/ Cycle 5.

REMOVE PAGE SUBSTITUTE PAGE(S) vli - (List of Figures) vii 47b - (Figure 3.1-2) 47b - (Figure 3.1-2a),

47c - (Figuru 3.1-2b),

47d - (Figure 3.1-2c) e 4

8201110549 820105 PDR ADOCK 05000333 P

pgg

y

, =.

4 JAFNPP LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page 1.1-1 APIN Flow Bias Scram Relationship to Normal Operating 23 Conditions 3.1-1 Manual Flow Control 47a 3.1-2a Operating Limit MCPR versusT For 8X8 Fuel Types 47b 3.1-2b Operating Limit MCPR versusT For 8X8R Fuel Types 47c 3.1-2c Operating Limit MCPR versusT For P8X8R Fuel Types 47d 4.1-1 Graphical Aid in the Selection of an Adequate Interval 48 Between Tests 4.2-1 Test Interval vs. Prnhability of System Unavailability 87 3.4-1 Sodium Pentaborate Solution Volume-Concentration 110 Requirements 3.4-2 Saturition Ttraperature of Sodium Pentaborate Solution 111 3.5-3 MAPUiGR Versus Planar Average Exposure 135a Reload 1, 8D274L 3.5-4 MAPulGR Versus Planar Average Exposure 135b Reload 1, 8D274H 3.5-5 MAPUiGR Versus Planar Average Exposure 135c acload 2, 8DRB265L 3.5-6 MAPUlGR Versus Planar Average Exposure 135d Reload 2, BDRB283 3.5-7 MAPUiGR Versus Planar Average Exposure 135e Reload 3, P8DRB265L 3.5-8 FMPUlGR Versus Planar Average Exposure 135f Reload 3, P8DRB28 3 3.5-9 MAPUlGR Versus Planar Average Exposure 135g Reload 4,P8DRB284L 3.5-10 MAPUIGR Versus Planar Average Exposure 135h Reload 4,P8DRB299 3.6-1 Beactor Vessel Thermal Pressurization Limitations 163 4.6-1 Chloride Stress Corrosion Test Resulte at 500*F 164 6.1-1 Management Organization Chart 259 6.2-1 Plant Staff Organization 260 A-sent no. A, yt, p(

vii

e FIGURE 3.1-2a Operating Limit MCPR Versus Y (Cection 4.1.E)

For 8x8 Fuel Types 1.40 ~

(1, 1.35) 1.35 -

2 y

a 0

0 5

(1, 1.30)

O 4

1.30 -

L 9

0 1.25 -

goc 1 (0.692, 1.242) to (0, 1.23)

BOC (0, 1. 21')

1.21) 1.20 -

0'.1 0.2 0'. 3 0.4 0'. 5 0'. 6 0'. 7 d.8 d.9 k.0 0

t' Option B T =0 Option A t' =l 47b Amendment No.

e...

FIGURE 3.1-2b Operating Limit MCPR Versus T (Section 4.1.E)

For 8X8R Fuel Types 1.40 -

I-1.35 -

W E

09 (1, 1.30)

"j 1.30 -

4 O

L m

i f

c s

a 0

Eo 50 SOC (0.769, 1.256)

(0, 1.23) 1.20 -

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Y

Option B t'=0 Option A t =l Ammendment No.

1

FIGURE 3.1-2c Operating Limit MCPR Versus T (Section 4.1.E)

For P8X8R Fuel Types 1.40 (1, 1.37) 1.35 (1, 1.34) 00 5

O L

1.30 e

.d ba E

l' t

(0.600, 1.256)

~

'a (0, 1.25)

SOC u

(0, 1.22) 1.20 1

I I

I I

I I

I I

l 0

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Option B T =0 Option A T =l Amendment No.

47d

. _ -..