ML20039B477

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-302/81-22.Corrective Actions:Catalytic QC Inspector Assigned to Tendon Surveillance Activities & No Holdpoints Will Be Signed Unless Witnessed by QC Inspectors
ML20039B477
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/01/1981
From: Baynard P, Poole D
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20039B474 List:
References
CS-81-310, NUDOCS 8112230097
Download: ML20039B477 (2)


Text

A-econ

,m

. % 'W. ~R.

?)

c oi

,'Q-M'

..?

u s H R O R E GIO N..

M. g#49W;e,Y,?

p ANTA.GECWM".

m19 o

pp R D '. J -

M De em er,3 1, 1 981 I

3-0-3-a-2 coa.oa now CS-81-310

  1. 3F-1281 -03 Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection & Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Mcrietta St., Suite 3100 Atlanta, GA 30303

Subject:

Docket No. 50-302 License No. DPR-72 Ref.: RII:JJL 50-302/81-22

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

We offer the following response to the violations listed in the ref-erenced inspection report.

NOTICE OF VIOLATION 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II, as implemented by FSAR Section 1.7.6.7.1.b, requires in part that personnel re-sponsible for performing quality activities be trained and indoctrinated as necessary to assure that suitable proficiency is achieved and maintained for accomplishing activities af-fecting quality.

Contrary to the above, the NQA/QC inspector inspecting ten-don surveillance activities was not adequately trained for performance of his inspection.

Response: After reviewing all available data and interviewing the FPC Catalytic QC in.pector involved, we concur with the violation as stated.

During the interview with the FPC Catalytic QC inspector, he stated that when the NRC inspector left the worksite, it was assumed that those par-ticular. steps witnessed by the NRC and the VSL QC inspector were acceptable.

He then signed for those particular steps. The FPC Catalytic QC inspec-tor was not at the worksite because of limited. space on the work platform.

OFF1GIAL COPY 3 8112230097 811215%

'jDRADOCK 05000302 PDR General Office 32o1 inirty fourin street soutn. P O Box 14042, St Petersburg. Fiorda 33733 e 813-866-5151 L

J

L e

Notice of Violation RII:JJL 50-302/81-22 Page 2 Immediate investigation into this reported violation resulted in relieving the FPC Catalytic inspector of that specific job. Another FPC Catalytic QC inspector was assigned to the task and was personally briefed on the conditions and circumstances surrounding the identified violation, and his responsibilities involved in the task.

j This violation and its surrounding conditions and inspector responsibilities in witnessing and signing QC holdpoints was discussed with all Florida Power Corporation and Catalytic inspectors. No holdpoints will be signed unless actually witnessed by the QC inspectors.

Full compliance with the identifying corrective action was achieved on October 23, 1981.

Should there be further questions, please contact us.

Very truly yours, FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION b

0; t.,,$. 73;,,. r al D. C. Poole

/

0 V

/ ff Nuclear Plant Manager

[

~

s Patsy Y. Baynard JC/rc Manager Nuclear Support Services