ML20039A302
| ML20039A302 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck, Calvert Cliffs File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1981 |
| From: | INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML093430786 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112170067 | |
| Download: ML20039A302 (39) | |
Text
h
. f,
p
(
Evaluation Report August 1981 n
n.,..
ue ver: u r~s
\\ucea Power 3 en:
3a :imore Gas & E ec:ric Comaany O
g 8112170 O @
- a -.
I
' p' 4
EVALUATION Of CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR PLANT Baltimore Gas and Electric Company August 1981
....._....A
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Pago1
SUMMARY
i i
INTRODUCTION The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) conducted its first evaluation of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company's (BG&E) Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant during the weeks of April 27 and May 4,1981. Calvert Cliffs consists of two 880-megawatt (electrical) Combustion Engineering pressurized water reac-tor plants. It is located on the Chesapeake Bay near Lusby, Maryland. Unit I was placed in commercial operation in May 1975 and Unit II in April 1977.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE INPO conducted an evaluation of site activities to make an overall determination of plant operating safety, to evaluate management systems and controls and to identify areas needing improvement. Information was assembled from discus-sions, interviews, observations and review of plant documents.
The INPO evaluation team examined station organization, training, operations, maintenance, radiological and chemistry activities and site technical support.
Corporate activities, except as an incidental part of the station evaluation, were not included in the scope of the evaluation. As a basis for the evaluation, INPO used its own experience on best practices within the industry and written evaluation criteria which were furnished to the plant in advance. The evaluation standards are high, and the findings and recommendations are not limited to minimum standards of safety.
DETERMINATION Within the scope of this evaluation the team determined that the plant is being operated safely. The following favorable practices and accomplishments were noted:
o In supplying 59 percent of BG&E customers' total electric requirements in 1980, Calvert Cliffs achieved a combined capacity factor of 76.1 l
percent - and Unit II attained the highest in the nation,88.5 percent.
o The program for maintaining secondary plant integrity results in a notable absence of steam leaks.
l o
Personnel at the plant exhibited an impressive positive attitude and an obvious pride in their organization.
The qualification program for licensed operators is achieving good o
i 1
results.
l l
l l
l
\\
. p' C ALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 2 Improvements were recommended for the following conditions:
o The similarity of problems in control of che nistry reflects a need for an in-depth review and upgrading.
o The training and qualifying of non-licensed operators should be improved.
o Radioactive solid waste management should be improved.
o BG&E should ensure all aspects of plant operation are covered by adequate procedures.
Specific evaluation findings and recommendations are contained in the accom-panying DETAILS. Information of an administrative nature is included in the ADMINISTR ATIVE APPENDIX.
These findings were presented at an exit meeting at the plant on May 8,1981.
Recommendations are intended to augment BG&E's efforts to achieve the highest possible standards in its nuclear operations. Certain findings may reflect multiple deficiencies within a particular area. Therefore, in addressing these findings and recommendations, the company should look beyond correction of the specific deficiencies and address corrective actions toward the underlying issues.
The findings and BG&E's responses were reviewed with BG&E management on July 17,1981.
To follow the timely completion of these responses, INPO requests written notification when improvements are achieved on or before key target dates.
The evaluation team appreciates the excellent cooperation it received from all levels of the Baltimore Gas and Electric Company.
Calvert Cliffs plant personnel were prompt and courteous in responding to requests.
E. P. Wilkinson President l
l l
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 3 BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Response Summary Baltimore Gas & Electric Company welcomes the opportunity to have the operation and performance of its Calvert Cliffs Plant reviewed by INPO with the purpose of obtaining suggestions anc comments on how to further improve our operations and performance.
We fully support the mission of INPO in the establishment of benchmarks of excellence in the operation of nuclear power plants. It is recognized that only through high standards of performance and effective management controls, which ensure conformance to these standards, can we achieve safe and superior performance.
Most of the findings identified weaknesses that were known to the plant staff.
Many were already in the process of correction or resolution as noted in your evaluation report. We are particularly gratified to be made aware of those areas which, unknown to us, were evaluated as being weak. The findings identified within this evaluation report have been carefully reviewed and will be diligently pursued until satisfactorily corrected or resolved. We appreciate the cooper-ative attitude and help from the INPO evaluation team members.
i
{I CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
~
Page 4 DETAILS This portion of the report includes the detailed findings. It is composed of six sections, one for each of the major evaluation areas. Each section is headed by a summary describing the scope of the evaluation and the overall finding in that area.' The summary is followed by the specific findings, recommendations and utility responses related to each of INPO's evaluation procedures. Items relating to cel'cria that have not been included in INPO procedures but that are generally recognized as desirable, accepted techniques of industry and management are listed as General Criteria. The evaluation procedures that were used are listed in the ADMINISTRATIVE APPENDIX.
ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION The overall management of the plant was evaluated from an administrative viewpoint.
This encompassed an assessment of the existing directives and procedures, as well as their effectiveness.
An excellent system of goals and objectives has been established, and the plant's high capacity factor reflects the results achieved.
The staff organization is functioning well, and a high level of dedication and teamwork was evident. A review of the procedures for promulgating policy and guidance indicated a need for upgrading.
OBJECTIVES (INPO Procedure OA-101, Revision 2)
The plant's method of promulgating goals and objectives was evaluated. This included the method of implementing actions and of providing a periodic assessment of progress.
Finding (Criterion E)
The system for implementing goals and objectives does not provide for periodic monitoring by management to ensure timely progress and attainment.
i Recommendation
(
Develop a system to provide a periodic assessment of progress.
Response
l The corporate goals and performance objectives as assigned to plant personnel will be reviewed with the individual supervisor periodically during the year, as appropriate, to assess progress.
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE (INPO Procedure OA-102, Revision 2)
The administrative organization of the plant was evaluated. The following key areas were reviewed:
organization structure, position description utilization, performance evaluations and workload distribution.
t CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 5 1.
Finding (Criterion A)
The plant's organizational structure is reflected in diagrams and by a system of purpose and function statements. In the day-to-day executica of plant business, the necessary interface between several key positions is not addressed by either the diagrams or the purpose and function statements.
Recommendation Ensure that the authority and responsibility of plant supervisors are defined clearly and are in consonance with the actual working relationships.
Response
The purpose and function statements will be reviewed and revised by December 1981 to ensure they reflect the desired working relationships.
2.
Finding (Criterion B)
Written position descriptions exist for most of the plant staff; however, the descriptions are not based on job analysis.
As a result, some individuals are performing duties outside their position descriptions.
Recommendation Update the position descriptions so they reflect requirements of each position.
Response
Job descriptions for the plant staff will be reviewed and updated by December 1981 to ensure they reflect all significant job duties and reporting relationships.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (INPO Procedure O A-103, Revision 2)
An evaluation was made of the administrative system and procedures that are established for the operation and maintenance of the plant. This evaluation included an assessment of the effectiveness of these administrative controls.
Finding (Criterion A)
Some areas within the plant organization lack the administrative con-trols necessary to ensure long-term continuity and the maintenance of desired standards of performance. The following are key examples:
o Procedures are lacking for the proper conduct of primary plant chemistry.
o Procedures are lacking for the proper maintenance of secondary plant chemistry.
Program requirements have not been established for key facets of o
non-licensed operator training and retraining.
9
- ~ -
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Pago 6 Recommendation A review should be conducted of the plant's administrative procedures to identify and prioritize areas of weakness. Acticn should be taken to provide missing procedures and directives.
Existing procedures and directives should be upgraded as appropriate.
Response
The plant's administrative procedures will be reviewed to identify areas of weakness. Those weaknesses so identified will have new or upgraded procedures initiated by December 1981.
A QUALITY PROGRAMS (INPO Procedure OA-104, Revision 4)
The ability to monitor existing conditions and ongoing plant activities was evaluated.
Finding (Criterion A)
A few aspects of plant operations reflect insufficient involvement on the part of plant management. The situation applies to areas such as control of chemistry, plant material condition and training.
Recommendation A system should be developed to ensure the regular involvement of key management personnel in all areas and aspects of plant operations.
Response
The frequency of periodic tours of the plant and monitoring of evolutions in progress, by plant management, have been increased. A methodical program will be established by November 1981 to ensure all major areas or activities are monitored routinely.
INDUSTRIAL SAFETY (INPO Procedure OA-106, Revision 3)
The review of industrial safety included interviews with key personnel and extensive tours through the plant areas.
Finding (Criterion A)
A uniform policy for industrial safety has not been promulgated for the plant. As a result, different safety standards are in effect, and some workers do not receive training in important aspects of industrialsafety.
Specific areas of concern include the need for guidance for the handling i
of acids and caustic substances in the water treatment plant and l
insufficient control of flammables and hydrazine.
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Page 7 Recommendation Industrial safety training should be expanded under a uniform program so all personnel receive training as appropriate to their work assignment.
Guidance and safety precautions should be provided for specific situa-tions that present hazards to workers.
Response
Safety policies are being reviewed for uniformity. Any ambiguities will be clarified by January 1982.
A training program for those plant personnel who handle acids, caustic substances or hydrazine will be conducted by the Industrial Safety Inspector. This training will be completed by September 1981. Routine inspections will be conducted by both the fire and safety inspectors with the goal of the elimination of improper chemical storage.
SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM (INPO Procedure OA-107, Revision 2)
The program to accomplish required surveillance, inspection and testing was reviewed. This included the acceptance criteria, review of results and identifi-cation of vff-standard. conditions.
~ Finding
. All criteria in this procedure were met.
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS (INPO Procedure OA-108, Revision 1)
Written requirements and individual qualifications were evaluated.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
I
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Page 8 TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS The team evaluated the training organization, the administration of training programs, training resources and training effectiveness. Training programs for i
the following job classifications were also evaluated: licensed operators, non-licensed operators, shift technical advisors, mechanical and electrical mainte-nance personnel, and instrumentation and control technicians.
During the evaluation, the team found that'an extensive qualification system is being implemented for licensed operators. Additionally, the training organiza-tion has initiated several job analysis projects for the purpose of developing and revising training programs.
The expansion of the training organization and associated training facilities needed to support the new or modified qualification programs is either in progress or being planned. The evaluation team also found that the training program for non-licensed operators shculd be modified signifi-cantly. Several other training programs and practices can be improved.
TRAINING ORGANIZATION AND ADMINErRATION (INPO Procedure TQ-211, Revision 2)
The team examined the on-site training organization and the administrative guidance used by the organization to develop, implement and evaluate training activities and programs used for the qualification of plant personnel.
1.
Finding (Criterion B)
The quality of training should be improved in several areas; also, some important training is being delayed.
Specifically, the non-licensed operator qualification program is affected adversely by incomplete training in plant fundamentals and inconsistent training in plant systems.
The development of qualification programs for shift technical advisors and electrical maintenance personnel has been delayed significantly.
The licensed operator training schedule for 1981 through 1983 exceeds the current training unit's manpower capabilities.
This condition has been recognized by training management. An organization development plan has been outlined and reviewed with plant management.
Recommendation The review of the manpower needs of the training staff should be completed. A staffing plan should be outlined and implemented in a manner that incorporates projected training schedules, + raining priorities.
and sources of qualified instructors.
Response
Implementation of a plant operator training program will improve non-licensed operator qualification by providing a sound foundation in operator-related fundamentals, plant system knowledge and watch station procedures.
The first course for plant operators began on July 17,1981.
Development of formal training programs for shift technical advisors and electrical maintenance personnel was delayed because of a necessary shift of instructor resources. However, in June 1981, additional person-nel were made available from several sources to allow continued
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 9 development of each of these programs. Until the permanent comple-ment of instructors can be increased to meet our anticipated needs, the training staff will be augmented by contractor instructors to ensure training schedules and priorities are met.
2.
Finding (Criterion D)
Electrician retraining is neither fully established nor fully implemented.
Information on equipment and. procedure changes is not effectively disseminated. Additionally, periodic review of plant systems and job-related technical information is not being conducted.
Recommendation Establish and implement a retraining program to maintain and improve the electricians' capabilities. The program'should keep the electrician
- e. ware of job-related equipment and procedure changes and should periodically review plant systems and selected technical information.
Response
It is expected that retraining of electricians will begin in December 1981 and will include periodic review of plant systems and job-related technical information. Subsequent retraining will be conducted annually.
3.
Finding (Criterion F) l Several training programs are not based on a systematic evaluation of i
training needs or job analysis. Job analysis projects are in progress for plant operators, electricians, instrument and control technicians, health physics technicians and chemistry technicians. This effort has identified several training needs which are not covered in established training programs.
Recommendation The job analysis projects should be completed. The development and revision of training programs based on the job analysis results should be planned and implemented.
Response
Training program development based on a job and task analysis is a new approach at Calvert Cliffs. The training programs being developed using this method were selected on the basis of greatest need. Additional analyses are planned for the licensed operator, shift technical advisor and engineer training programs.
The licensed operator and shift technical advisor training program analyses will not proceed until after the completion of the job and task analysis being conducted by INPO, which is presently scheduled for completion in December 1981. Job and task analyses associated with the engineer positions at Calvert Cliffs will begin in November 1981.
l l
l C ALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 10 TRAINING RESOURCES
~
(INPO Procedure TQ-221, Revision 2)
'Ihe team examined the training facilities, equipment and materials available to support training programs for plant personnel.
i Finding (Criterion F)
Lesson plans do not exist for the shift technical advisor program, and few have been developed for the licensed operator requalification program.
Additionally, technical reference materials are not readily available for instructor preparation or trainee study. This has resulted in inconsistent levels of training and inefficient instructor preparation.
Recommendation Lesson plans should be developed for each subject in established training programs. Also, a library of technical reference materials should be made accessible to the trainees and instructors.
Response
All future training programs will include the preparation or updating of lesson plans. A library of technical reference material is being accumu-lated. As training programs are developed, this material will be made available to trainees and instructors.
TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS (INPO Procedure TQ-231, Revision 2)
The team examined plant management and training staff practices relating to evaluation of training program effectiveness, auditing of training activities and evaluation of instructor and trainee performance in training programs.
1.
Finding (Criterion A)
Training programs are not evaluated systematically to determine pro-gram effectiveness and to identify recommended program changes.
Recommendation A program for periodic evaluation of training effectiveness should be established and implemented. The results of these evaluations should be used to determine if training goals are being met and if appropriate training practices are being used. The evaluations should also be used to identify recommended changes and monitor for improvement.
Response
The programs that are being developed (see response to TQ-211, Criterion F) include provisions for systematic evaluations by means of trainee proficiency test and discussion with unit supervisors.
Other programc willinclude this feature as they are developed.
2.
Finding (Criterion C)
Instructor performance is not being evaluated periodically during training sessions.
This allows inconsistency in training and does not provide necessary performance feedback.
~
CALVERT CUFFS (1981)
, Page 11 C
'H Recommendation The training supervisor or other designated personn si should periodically ;
s 3
observe and evaluate instructor classroom performance. Performance areas being monitored should include technical competence, comniunica-
/
tion skills, classroom control and accomplishment of objectives. <
Response
BGdcE has actively participated in the development of the 1NPO i
" Certification Standards and Procedures for Nuclear Power Plant Technical Instructors." A program of certification and evaluation, which conforms to these guidelines, will be adopte.1 when they are releaseda In the meantime, a procedure will be developed by September 1981 to certify instructors and evaluate their performance.
n n.
\\ ?:
4 NON-LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING (INPO Procedure TQ-242, Revision 2)
Ni l!
The team examined the training program and training practices used to initially i'
qualify non-licensed operator candidates and to maintain and improve the qualifications of existing non-licensed operators.
o s 1.
Finding (Criterion C) s Several important job-related skills and knowledge areas are not covered f
in the initial training for-plant'non-licensed operators (outside operator, q,
auxiliary building operator and turbine building operator). -Additionally, _ _ T the training is administered through an on-the-job checkout system, T t
~
which allows significant variation in.the trainee's qualifications.
g N Recommendation 4
The job analysis projects now being conducted for plant non-licensed operators should be completed.
The non-licensed operator' training program should be restructured to include classroom training on plant fundamentals and plant systems, as well as on-the-job training exercises.
s
.C The evaluation of trainee qualifications should be structured to ennble consistent verification of required competencies.
Response
y The training program presently in development will correct the problems identified with the plant operator training program (see the reply for TQ-211, Finding 1, Criterion B).
2.
Finding (Criterion D)
Plant non-licensed operator retraining is not being conducted to ensure 1 the following:
o effective dissemination of information on equipment and procedure
\\
changes o review of applicable plant operating experiences o periodic review of plant systems information o periodic review of job-related technicalinformation.
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Pago 12 Recommendation A retraining program for plant non-licensed operators should be estab-EJtshed and implemented. The INPO " Nuclear Power Plant Non-Licensed Operator Guidelines for Qualification Programs" should provide details for determining the program requirements.
Response
As of July 1981, plant operators have been included in the applicable portions of the IIcensed operator requalification program.
Topics O!ccluded in this program are system and procedure changes, plant operating experiences, a review of plant systems and any job-related technical information which applies to their positions. This approach will be evaluated, and, if proven inadequate, a separate plant operator retraining program will be developed.
i.
, a, '-
LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING (INPO Procedure TQ-243, Revision 2)
The team examined the training program and training practices used to initially qualify licensed operator candidates to operate the nuclear pMnt reliably and s
K safely.
\\
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
s b
u 1_
1 s..
N g
e
~
3 - ', ' LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING (INPO Procedure TQ-244, Revision 2) 4 The team examined the program and training practices used to maintain and m v improve the qualifications of licensed personnel.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
r 1
SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR TRAINING (INPO Procedure TQ-245, Revision 1)
!i
~
L l t The team examined the qualification program and training practices used to
"~
initially qualify shiftstechnical advisor (STA) candidates and to maintain and improve the qualifications of the STA.
y
's kg.
, \\
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Page 13 1.
Finding (Criterion A)
The shift technical advisor qualification program has not been formal-ized. The training conducted for STAS during 1980 has not been revised to reflect pending changes.
Recommendation The STA training program should be formally established. The training sessions already conducted for STAS and the INPO " Nuclear Power Plant Shift Technical Advisor Recommendations for Position Description, Qualifications, Education and Training" guidelines should provide a basis for determining program requirements.
Response
The development of a formal STA training progra.d is in progress and is expected to be completed before October 1981. This new program will reflect any changes from the 1980 program which are identified as being necessary.
2.
Finding (Criterion D)
The shift technical advisor retraining requirements have not been established or implemented.
Recommendation An STA retraining program should be established and implemented. The INPO " Nuclear Power Plant Shift Technical Advisor Recommendations for Position Description, Qualifications, Education and Training" guide-lines should provide a basis for determining program requirements.
Response
The above-mentioned training program will include the identification of STA retraining requirements.
These retraining requirements will be incorporated into the licensed operator retraining program for senior control room operators and shift supervisors.
1 t
l I
i l
I s
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 14 OPERATIONS Operations was evaluated for performance in conduct of shift operations, tagout practices, organization and administration, procedures, plant status controls, shift turnover and facilities and equipment.
The evaluation concluded the licensed personnel are well-qualified, experienced persens who operate the plant in a safe, professional manner. The need for more management involvement in controlling certain aspects of plant operation and administration was noted.
OPERATIONS ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION (INPO Procedure OP-301, Revision 2)
An evaluation was performed to determine if a clearly defined operations organization exists and if assignment of responsibilities and authority are adequate for accomplishment of required tasks.
Areas reviewed included organiz.ation structure, job descriptions, shift administrative assignments, writ-ten and oralinstructions and orders, and miscellaneous administrative programs.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
TAGOUT PRACTICES (INPO Procedure OP-302, Revision 2)
An evaluation was performed to determine if established tagout pracces ensure protection of personnel and equipment. Areas reviewed included senior reactor operator approval of safety-related tagouts, independent verification of tagged equipment for personnel safety, independent verification of safety-related components, tag coloring, tag numbering and review of clearance logs.
1.
Finding (Criterion C)
An independent verification is not required, nor is it being conducted, for operation of important components that are repositioned during testing or maintenance, are safety-related and have no control room indication.
Recommendation Expand existing procedures to include instructions for performing an independent verification of components that are repositioned during testing or maintenance, are safety-related and have no control room indication.
l
Response
Existing procedures will be expanded by October 1981 to include appropriate instructions for performing an independent verification of components that de positioned during testing or maintenance, are safety-related and have no control room indication.
CALVF.RT CLIFFS (1981)
Page 15 2.
Finding (Criterion G)
A periodic review and audit of the status of all tagouts are neither required nor conducted.
Recommendation Expand existing procedures to include instructions for requiring a peri-odic review and audit of the tagout system. These instructions should provide for a comparison between tags "as placed" versus "as logged" in the tagout book, an updated determination of need for the clearance and a verification that equipment is in the correct position.
Response
CCI-112, " Safety and Safety Tagging," will be revised by October 1981 to include requirements for periodic reviews and audits of the tagout system.
CONDUCT OF SHIFT OPERATIONS (INPO Procedure OP-303, Revision 3)
An evaluation was performed to determine how effectively the conduct of shift operations maintains quality shift performance. Areas reviewed included opera-tor activities, station cleanliness and order, response to abnormal conditions, logkeeping practices, reliability of control room instrumentation and operator awareness of plant conditions.
1.
Finding (Criterion J)
Access to the control room is not being controlled to ensure only those with a specific function are allowed entry.
Recommendation Develop and implement a policy to ensure control room access is limited to those with a specific function in the control room.
Consideration should be given to an overall reduction in the number of persons allowed uncontrolled access to the control room.
The system for processing maintenance requests should be reviewed to determine if changes could be made to reduce traffic through the control room.
Response
To reduce the number of persons who have uncontrolled access to the control room, the Security Screening Unit has been tasked with deter-mining, by October 1981, how to best limit access to the control room to those with a specific function to perform within its confines.
With regard to the processing of maintenance requests, the Operations Advisory Group has been tasked with formulating recommendations on ways to reduce this traffic in the control room.
Additior. ally, a task force has also been formed to develop a computerized maintenance request tracking system.
It is envisioned that this system, when operational in July 1982. will have a positive effect on the reduction of the control room traffic.
I l
i
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 16 2.
Finding (Criterion B)
The control boards are not being kept neat and orderly. The boards were dusty and had an excessive number of items such as tags, sketches and drawings attached to the boards.
Recommendation Develop and implement a policy for keeping the control boards neat and orderly. Consideration should be given to including a positive method for controlling information allowed to be attached to the control board.
Response
The control boards have been thoroughly cleaned since the INPO plant visit and extraneous material has been removed.
De importance of control board neatness and orderliness has been discussed with the shift supervisors.
See response to OP-305, Finding (Criterion A) for a description of the procedures to be implemented to control attaching information to the control boards.
USE OF PROCEDURES (INPO Procedure OP-304, Revision 2)
The evaluation team examined the use of procedures to determine if manage-ment policies exist for use of procedures, procedures are being utilized, procedures are written clearly, instructions in emergency precedures allow quick and appropriate responses to situations, and a system for revising and controlling procedures is in effect.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
PLANT STATUS CONTROLS l
(INPO Procedure OP-305, Revision 2)
An evaluation was performed to determine that plant status controls are provided to ensure adequate equipment and system availability. Areas reviewed included management prog ams and policies that provide guidance for status control, actual practices in status control, responsibilities of senior licensed l
operators assigned to monitor and review status control and provisions for status control under special conditions such as outages, accident recovery or refueling.
1.
Finding (Criterior A)
Insufficient control has allowed several conditions to detract from formal operation of the plant.
Other conditions detract from the operator's ability to accertain plant status, for example:
o Informal and unauthorized instructions, notes and drawings are in use throughout the plant.
Page 17 o Numerous construction turnover tags remain in place.
\\
o Maintenance request tags remain after maintenance work is com-pleted.
I o Caution tags remain after the concern has been incorporated into a procedure.
Recommendation Develop and implement a policy to control the use of instructions, drawings and notes. The policy should include a mechanism to ensure a review for updating or removal of temporary instructions.
Response
Informal, unauthorized and obsolete tags and notes are being removed from the plant. A Calvert Cliffs Instruction (CCI) will be promulgated to provide controls on the placement of temporary notes in the operating i
spaces. This CCI, which will adder.ss the approval, periodic review and removal of such notes, will be implemented by December 1981.
i CCI-200, " Maintenance Requests," has been revised to clarify, that the technicians /craftsmens are tasked with removing deficiency tags after the maintenance action has been completed.
All technicians and -
craftsmen have. been reinstructed in this requirement.
Additionally, deficiency tags have been removed from all jobs known to have been completed to date.
2.
Finding (Criterion A)
The plant does not have an effective system for maintaining the status of maintenance requests. The system used by Operations to account for active maintenance requests is not effective.
~
Recommendation Develop and implement a policy for maintaining the status of mainte-nance requests. The policy should include individual responsibilities and a mechanism for management to evaluate the effectiveness of its implementation.
Response
Calvert Cliffs is developing a computerized system for tracking out-standing maintenance requests for plant equipment. This system will enable cperations and maintenance personnel to quickly assess and/or review operational status of equipment, maintenance progress and maintenance priorities. The system will also assist maintenance person-nel in outage planning. It is anticipated that this system will be fully operational by July 1982.
In addition, it is anticipated that implementation of an upgraded maintenance management system in l
December 1981, in conjunction with updated shop lists of all active maintenance requests, will provide better controls over maintenance requests.
i i
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Page 18 OPERATIONS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT (INPO Procedure OP-306, Revision 2)
The evaluation team examined operations facilitiea and equipment to verify equipment is accessible for operation, programs are in place to maximize equipment availability, the working environment is adequate and contributes to overall efficiency, and safety of plant operations and communication equipment is adequate.
Finding (General Criterion)
Plant valves, gauges, systems and components are not clearly identified by permanent, distinguishable and consistent labeling.
Recommendatior:
Conduct a review of current valve, component and system labeling with a long-range goal of establishing and implementing a permanent, distin-guishable and consistent method of identification.
Response
The system for relabeling plant valves and gauges has been developed and is being implemented.
The system consists of stainless steel identification tags with the valve or gauge number and noun name embossed on the tag attached to the component. It is anticipated that all plant valves and gauges that appear on P&ID drawings will be fully identified as described above by December 1982.
A system for identifying other plant components is also being developed.
It is anticipated that labeling of all major equipment with component number and noun name can be achieved by December 1982.
SHIFT TURNOVER (INPO Procedure OP-307, Revision 2)
The team examined shift turnover to determine if peccedures specify turnover requirements for all operating shift positions; that shift turnovers include mechanisms to communicate pertinent information regarding equipment status, operations or testing in progress; and pertinent logs are reviewed.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 19 MAINTENANCE The maintenance organization, preventive maintenance program, maintenance procedures and administrative systems for controlling and documenting mainte-nance work were examined. The methods used to control test equipment, the overall adequacy of mainterince facilities and equipment and the control of special processes were also evaluated.
The plant has an effective maintenance program as well as a good program for the calibration of measuring and testing equipment. Some improvements are warranted in the department's administrative controls.
MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION (INPO Procedure MA-401, Revision 2)
The maintenance group was evaluated to determine if it is staffed and organized to accomplish maintenance tasks. Areas of interest included position descrip-tions, assignment of responsibilities and authorities, administrative controls, safety and communications programs and administrative workload.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (INPO Procedure MA-402, Revision 1)
A review was made to determine if preventive maintenance (PM) activities are being performed and if a well-defined and effective program is in effect.
Administrative procedures governing the program and the organization responsi-ble for program implementation were also examined. Areas of interest included criteria used to define what equipment is covered by the program, use of equipment history files in conjunction with the program, adequacy of PM procedures for safety-related equipment and frequency of PM inspections.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES (INPO Procedure MA-403, Revision 3)
The team evaluated the degree to which maintenance procedures enhance the quality and effectiveness of maintenance activities. Areas reviewed included activities governed by procedures, methods for procedure development and revision and content of procedures.
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 20 Finding (Criterion F)
Guidelines have not been promulgated to specify when written proce-dures are required to support corrective maintenance.
Recommendation Guidelines should define when the use of procedures is required for maintenance activities.
Response
Guidance will be established in CCI-200, " Maintenance Requests," to define when written procedures are required to support corrective maintenance. The CCI will be revised by October 1981.
WORK CONTROL SYSTEM (INPO Procedure MA-404, Revision 3)
The team evaluated the effectiveness of the work control system in use at the plant. This included a review of the method for several tasks:
o defining and authorizing work to be performed by the maintenance groups i
o planning, scheduling and control of actual work o placing maintenance results into an equipment history file for future evaluation.
1.
Finding (Criterion D)
A method for planning and scheduling maintenance activities does not exist for the efficient accomplishment of forced-outage work.
Recommendation Management should establish a method for planning and scheduling forced-outage maintenance activities.
Response
l Two programs are currently under development which will address this finding. These are a computerized listing of outstanding maintenance requests with appropriate status information and a Maintenance Management System.
It is expected that these programs will be finalized by late this year and implemented shortly thereafter.
I 2.
Finding (Criterion E)
A method for review of proposed work is not established to ensure the inclusion of provisions necessary to minimize radiation exposure.
Recommendation Management should establish a method of reviewing proposed mainte-nance activities to minimize radiation exposure.
Response
A method of reviewing proposed maintenance activities for the purpose of minimizing radiation exposures has been developed as an integral part of radiation safety programs. It is expected that these procedures will
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 21 become functional for all activities involving significant radiation expo-sures by December 1981.
MAINTENANCE HISTORY (INPO Procedure MA-405, Revision 2)
The team reviewed maintenance history records to determine if they were complete and functional and if they were being used for evaluating equipment performance.
Evaluation areas covered the amount and type of equipment included in the program; type, level of detail, traceability and retrievability of records; methods used in reviewing and evaluating maintenance history; and assignment of responsibility for implementing the program.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
CONTROL AND CALIBRATION OF TEST EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION (INPO Procedure MA-406, Revision 2)
The calibration and control of testing equipment and instrumentation were reviewed.
Specifically, methods used for identifying, calibrating, storing, issuing, transporting and using measuring and testing equipment were examined.
Procedures establishing and governing the calibration program and the existing calibration records were also reviewed.
Finding (Criterion E)
Storage locations for controlled testing equipment are not separate from that for non-controlled equipment. Such practice does not provide for optimum control and maintenance of quality.
Recommendation Controlled testing equipment should be in a segregated space to provide a high degree of safety from inadvertent or undesired handling and use.
Response
Controls will be added to the plant administrative procedure CCI-120,
" Calibration Program for Measuring and Test Equipment," to require distinctive marking and segregated storage for uncontrolled equipment.
The procedure changes will be completed by October 1981, and full implementation will be completed by November 1981.
1 l
l l
CALVERT CLIFFS (198D Paga 22 MAINTENANCE FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT (INPO Procedure MA-408, Revision 1) ne evaluation team examined maintenance facilities and equipment to deter-mine adequacy and condition. The location, size and condition of office, work and storage space were examined, along with the number, type, condition and location of maintenance tools and equipment.
To a limited extent, the warehouse facility was also examined.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
l
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 23 RADIATION AND CHEMISTRY Radiation protection and chemistry were evaluated by reviewing training, dosimetry, internal and external radiation exposure control and water chemistry control. 'lhis portion of the evaluation was primarily an examination of plant programs and facilities as they function under normal operating (non-outage) conditions.
Several good radiation exposure reduction practices were noted in the plant, such as the use of training mockups for steam generator and reactor coolant pump seal repair, the installation of temporary shielding and the utilization of shielded containers for spent-fuel pool filter removal. Respirator qualitative perform-ance testing, the scope of the dosimetry program and the available facilities were noted strengths of the radiological protection program.
However, weaknesses were identified in the control of chemical parameters; the lack of involvement of radiation safety, operations and maintenance groups in an aggressive radioactive solid waste reduction effort; and the absence of a systematic approach to radiation exposure reduction.
RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY (INPO Procedure RC-501, Revision 1)
An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of the management of radiological protection and chemistry.
Radiological protection technician training also was evaluated to determine its ability to instill the knowledge and practical abilities necessary for a high level of performance.
Finding (Criterion D)
Radiological protection technicians and trainees receive little training other than on-the-job experience.
Recommendation Expedite the development and implementation of the radiological pro-tection technician training program.
Ensure the training program includes instruction in radiological protection theory, practical skill development and reactor plant systems.
Response
Development of a formal training program for radiological protection technicians is in progress. This program will include classroom and on-the-job training as well as training in appropriate plant systems. The initial training course is presently scheduled to commence in November 1981.
An on-site radiological protection training program for radiation safety technicians and trainees is under development. Upon finalization of this program, training will include instruction in radiological protection theory, practical skill development and applicable plant systems. As an interim measure, training of technicians and trainees is being accom-plished by use of off-site established training programs.
I I
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Page 24 ALARA PROGRAM (INPO Procedure RC-502, Revision 2)
An evaluation was performed to determine if the plant was making a substantial effort to reduce personnel radiation exposure - as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).
1.
Finding (Criterion D)
The plant does not routinely set radiation exposure goals such as annual and job-specific goals. Exposure trend analysis is not used to predict exposure levels or indicate major sources of exposure.
Recommendation Set radiation exposure goals for the annual exposure of employees of the plant and for specific jobs. Employ exposure trend analysis to identify areas where exposure can be reduced and to measure the success in meeting exposure goals.
Response
A formal ALARA program will be developed and implemented by December 1981 that includes the setting of annual and appropriate job-specific radiation exposure goals.
Additionally, it will employ trend analysis to identify where exposures may be reduced and measure the success in meeting these goals.
2.
Finding (Criterion E)
Procedures do not exist that identify areas subject to ALARA review and that describe actions to be taken after review. Major areas of plant operation, such as outages, have not been subject to ALARA preplanning.
Recommendation Include in the ALARA procedures under development criteria that specify areas subject to ALARA review and actions to be taken es a result of ALARA review. Conduct ALARA preplanning for all major facets of plant operation.
Response
The ALARA program to be implemented in December 1981 will specify areas subject to ALARA review and actions to be taken as a result of such reviews.
PERSONNEL DOSIMETRY (INPO Procedure RC-503, Revision 1) i l
An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of the plant's
(
dosimetry program in measuring, evaluating and recording occupational radiation exposures.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
(
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Page 25 RADIATION SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL (INPO Procedure RC-504, Revision 2)
An evaluation was performed to determine if the plant was minimizing the contamination of equipment, areas in the plant and personnel.
1.
Finding (Criterion C)
Repeated overflows of the floor drains on the +5 foot elevation of the auxiliary building cause this area to be continuously contaminated.
Recommendation Identify and correct the cause of the overflow.
Response
An evaluation of the auxiliary building drain system will be complete by September 1981. Necessary procedure or facility changes will be initi-ated immediately upon completion of the drain system evaluation.
2.
Finding (General Criterion)
A number of radiological control practices were observed that need improvement. Examples of these practices include improper personnel monitoring for radioactive contamination, improper wearing of anticon-tamination clothing and poor contamination control practices by work-ers.
Recommendation The plant should improve compliance with good radiological control practices.
Response
Increased emphasis will be placed in this area during our radiological training and retraining courses. In addition, in-field adherence to these practices will be more effectively monitored.
WASTE AND DISCHARGE CONTROL (INPO Procedure RC-505, Revision 0)
This area was evaluated to determine if volumes of solid radioactive waste are minimized.
1 1.
Finding (General Criterion)
The plant should expend greater effort to reduce the generation of solid radioactive waste. Historical data on the generation of solid radioactive waste indicates that the plant could generate more waste per month than the burial site routine allotment.
Areas were identified where improvements can be made to reduce the generation of solid radioactive waste. They include the sorting of clean from contaminated material in controlled area trash; the prohibition against bringing needless clean material, such as packaging material, into controlled areas; and using inserts on all drums of compressible waste to increase their density.
l Involvement of the Radiation Protection, Operations and Maintenance departments' management is needed, along with worker training stressing waste reduction, in order to effectively implement a radioactive solid
[
waste reduction effort.
1
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 26 "ecommendation Implement a program which minimizes the generation of solid radioac-i tive waste and maximizes the density of solid waste shipments.
Response
A task force is curre.itly developing a formal program to reduce solid radioactive waste generation and to maximize solid waste densities. It is anticipated that the task force recommendations will be submitted to management by October 1981 with appropriate implementation to occur in a timely manner.
New equipment has been received and will be installed that will maximize solid waste densities.
2.
Finding (General Criterion)
The plant should expend greater effort to reduce the accumulation of radioactive material. Contaminated equipment is not routinely sorted for reuse. This, combined with a minimal decontamination effort for items such as tools and scaffolding, has resulted in an accumulation of radioactive material stored on site.
Recommendation Initiate a program to reduce, by decontaminating or reusing contami-nated equipment, the generation of radioactive material and the amount of material stored on-site.
Response
A program will be developed by December 1981 to reduce, by decontam-ination or reuse of contaminated equipment, the generation and storage of radioactive materials on-site.
RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY EQUIPMENT CONTROL AND CALIBRATION (INFO Procedure RC-506, Revision 2)
An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of the plant's radiological survey equipment calibration and control program.
Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
PERSONNEL HP INDOCTRINATION (INPO Procedure RC-507, Revision 2)
An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of the plant's health physics (HP) indoctrination program. This area was evaluated by observing the training for personnel who do not enter radiologically controlled areas and by reviewing plans and records for training of personnel who work in radiologically controlled areas.
m v
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Page 27 Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
PROCESS WATER CONTROLS (INPO Procedure RC-508, Revision 2)
An evaluation was performed to determine if the plant was performing accurate chemistry measurements and aggressively controlling chemistry parameters.
1.
Finding (Criterion A)
Several problems in chemistry exist as identified by observation of chemistry activities:
o Procedures do not exist for sampling operations or for chemical additions.
Informal procedures are being used for chemical analysis and for o
responses to plant out-of-specification conditions.
Recommendation Develop and implement approved procedures for sampling operations, chemical additions and responses to out-of-specification conditions.
Ensure that only controlled procedures are used for chemistry activities.
Response
Radiation Safety and Chemistry Procedures relating to chemistry arc currently under review and the need for procedures now missing will be determined.
Procedures requiring generation or revision will be completed by December 1981.
2.
Finding (Criterion C)
The level of training and qualification for chemistry technicians was observed to be inadequate in certain areas. For example, significant training weaknesses were identified in primary chemistry sampling and secondary chemistry control.
Recommendation Expedite the development and implementation of the chemistry techni-cian training course.
Ensure that technicians are qualified for each procedure they are presently performing.
Response
A formal training program is being developed for chemistry technicians.
This program is based on job and task analysis.
The training for technicians is presently scheduled to begin by October 1981.
The chemistry technician training course is currently a high priority of the Training Unit. A draft Chemistry Training Manual has been issued for interim use so the training program may begin.
Modifications and improvements in the program are currently being performed by a L
consultant to Baltimore Gas and Electric.
l t
i
1
~
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 28 3.
Finding (Criterion D)
Key chemical parameters have been allowed to remain out of specifica-tion without timely corrective action.
Recommendation Provide for greater management review of day-to-day measurement of key chemical parameters and the trends of these parameters. Ensure timely corrective action when out-of-specification chemistry is found.
Response
A daily status report of key chemistry parameters has been implemented to ensure more timely management involvement in the review of chemistry conditions.
Additionally, chemistry procedures are being revised to ensure appropriate levels of management are promptly informed of out-of-specification chemistry.
4.
Finding (General Crit,erion)
The state of cleanliness and the lack of order in the chemistry laboratory have the potential for adversely affecting the quality of analytical results.
Recommendation The chemistry laboratory should be kept clean, and equipment should be organized to best support the analyses that are performed.
Response
Conditions have been upgraded, and greater attention. and effort are being devoted toward maintaining the laboratory clean and orderly.
HEALTH PHYSICS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT (INPO Procedure RC-509, Revision 2)
The chemistry and health physics facilities were evaluated to determine if they are adequate to support safe and efficien* plant operation.
Finding (General Criterion)
The lack of orderliness in the decontamination room and hot machine shop hinders the efficient and effective use of the facilities.
Recommendation The plant should remove stored radioactive material from these areas and restore order.
Response
i Materials have been removed or made more orderly in the decontamina-tion room and hot machine shop. The radioactive waste task force is addressing this aspect of the problem.
t l
?
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Page 29 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM (INPO Procedure RC-511, Revision 2)
An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of the plant's respiratory protection program in protecting personnel from airborne radioactiv-ity.
Areas reviewed included policy and procedures, control of airborne radioactivity, respirator fit testing for personnel and respirator maintenance.
ir Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 30 TECHNICAL SUPPORT An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of on-site technical support activities. Areas reviewed included organizational structure and size, assignment of responsibilities and effectiveness of coordination with other groups. Programs for control of design changes, on-and off-site industry event reviews, plant performance monitoring and reactor engineering activities were also reviewed.
The evaluation concluded that the station is receiving adequate technical support. Engineering training, plant performance monitoring, use of temporary electrical jumpers and computer software control were noted as areas where improvements could be made.
TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION
'.INPO Procedure TS-701, Revision 1)
The team evaluated on-site engineering support to determine if its organization and administration promote the accomplishment of required technical tasks.
Particuir attention was given to checking for an adequately staffed department with thoroughly knowledgeable individuals. Other areas of interest included the training program for this group and the administrative and clerical workload.
Finding (Criterion D)
Although department personnel occasionally attend seminars or special-ized classes given by outside organizations, no training program is in effect for them.
As a result, they receive no training to aid in the performance of their duties and responsibilities as plant design engi-neers.
Recommendation A formal program should be implemented to ensure that all department personnel receive training in appropriate areas of station operation.
Resoonse A plant system training course for new engineers began on June 30,1981.
As describcc in the response to the finding on TQ-211, Rev. 2, Criterion F, formal training program development will begin in November 1981.
ENGINEERING SUPPORT (INPO Procedure TS-702, Revision 2)
A review was conducted to determine the staff's effectiveness in resolving problems and concerns of a technical nature. This included plant performance monitoring, communications with on-and off-site groups, document control l
systems and engineering support facilities.
1.
Finding (Criterion A) l A coordinated effort does nut exist to monitor, assimilate and evaluate i
plant parameters important to thermal efficiency and reliability.
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Pag] 31 Recommendation A comprehensive program should be developed and implemented for plant performance monitoring with an objective of improving the plant operating efficiency.
Response
Currently, the Operations Unit trends plant heat rate and related parameters daily. Significant increases in plant heat rate are.mme--
diately investigated by the shift organization. Monthly plant heat rate, capacity and availability are reported to the Vice President-Supply to keep company management apprised of each unit's thermal performance and reliability. In May 1981, an additional engineer was assigned to the operations unit to develop these efforts into a comprehensive and more effective program.
2.
Finding (Criterion C)
Vendor technical manuals are not adequately controlled or maintained up-to-date.
Recommendation The current project in the Document Control Group of updating and controlling plant technical manuals should be continued.
Response
The current project of the control of technical manuals is expected to be completed by December 1981. Recommendations developed from this review will be implemented in a timely manner to ensure more effective control and maintenance of these manuals.
NUCLEAR OPERATING EXPERIENCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (INPO Procedure TS-703, Revision 1)
The effectiveness of operating experience evaluation and follcw-up was exam-ined. Areas reviewed included the program for handling in-house and industry operating experiences, util'zation of experienced technical personnel, periodic review of program effectiveness and periodic, independent evaluation of industry experiences to verify proper classification.
Finding (Criteria G.2 and G.4)
No documentation exists for the disposition of all nuclear industry operating experience information received by the plant. As a result, some information determined to be inapplicable may be discarded without being logged. This precludes management from performing an independent evaluation of the program effectiveness.
Recommendation l
Plant procedures regarding operating experience assessment should be revised to include logging of incoming operating experience information.
l In addition, the procedure should include a requirement for an indepen-dent review on a periodic basis to ensure proper classification of material.
o CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Paga 32
Response
The procedure for the Plant Operating Experience Assessment Com-mittee (POEAC) win be changed to incorporate a system that identifies all incoming information reviewed by the POEAC. This system win also provide a record of the disposition of allincoming material.
The existing audit requirements, which already provide for periodic audits of POEAC effectiveness, win be expanded to include an indepen-dent review of the record of incoming documents for proper classifica-tion. These procedural changes will be implemented by August 1981.
I PLANT MODIFICATIONS (INPO Procedure TS-704, Revision 1)
Methods and programs for plant modifications were evaluated to determine if modifications are implemented in a safe and timely manner and if the proper quality of plant systems and components is maintained.
Finding (Criterion F)
The Lifted Wire and Temporary Jumper Log contains entries which are sufficiently dated to be considered permanent, rather than temporary, design changes. These changes have not been subjected to the normal design change reviews.
Recommendation Station management should continue their efforts to reduce the number -
of jumpers presently installed in plant systems. In order to provide increased control over the use of jumpers in the future, the following recommendations are made:
o A technical review of proposed jumpers, in addition to the review by operations personnel, should be required. This review should include a safety evaluation or a statement explaining the basis for not requiring such an evaluation.
L o An individual not assigned to the operating shift should be designated to periodically review the log. He should ensure that 4
jumpers no longer needed are removed and the number of active jumpers is kept to a minimum.
Response
I CCI 117, " Lifted Wire and Jumper Log," will be revised by September l
1981 to require that all lifted wire and jumpers receive staff technical review and, where appropriate, POSRC review. These reviews will be conducted either prior to installation of the lifted wire or within a limited number of days thereafter if installation of the jumper or lifted
)
wire / jumper is approved by two members of the plant staff, one of whom i
holds an SRO license. The revised CCI-117 will further provide periodic review on outstanding jumpers and lifted wires to ensure that the number of such jumpers and lifted wires are kept to a necessary minimum.
7 CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
Page 33 ON-SITE REACTOR ENGINEERING (INPO Procedure TS-705, Revision 2)
The team examined procedures, controls on the plant computer and associated software, communications with other groups, fuel integrity commitments and l
I refueling activities.
Finding (Criterion B)
Adequate procedures do not exist to control and approve changes to the plant process computer software. For example, the process computer is used to determine xenon concentration for completing estimated critical positions. No procedure exists to verify that the computer calculation produces the same results as that specified in the vendor's design report.
Recommendation Management controls should be instituted to control and approve changes to the plant process computer software for parameters important to safety.
Response
By December 1981, the Facility Change Request system will be used to control and approve modifications to plant process computer software.
Parameters having safety significance will be identified and compared with expected values as a post-modification or maintenance check when-ever plant process computer software or hardware is subjected to a maintenance or modification activity.
l l
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
APPENDIX Page1 ADMINISTRATIVE APPENDIX I.
LISTING OF AREAS EVALUATED ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION OA-101 Objectives OA-102 Organization Structure OA-103 Administrative Controls O A-104 Quality Programs OA-106 Industrial Safety OA-107 Surveillance Program OA-108 Personnel Qualifications TRAINING AND QUALIFIC ATIONS TQ-211 Training Organization and Administration TQ-221 Training Resources TQ-231 Training Effectiveness TQ-242 Non-Licensed Operator Training TQ-243 Licensed Operator Training TQ-244 Licensed Operator Requalification Training TQ-245 Shift Technical Advisor Training OPERATIONS OP-301 Operations Organization and Administration O P-302 Tagout Practices OP-303 Conduct of Shift Operations O P-304 Use of Procedures OP-305 Plant Status Controls O P-306 Operations Facilities and Equipment O P-307 Shif t Turnover MAINTENANCE MA-401 Maintenance Organization and Administration MA-402 Preventive Maintenance MA-403 Maintenance Procedures MA-404 Work Control System MA-405 Maintenance History MA-406 Control and Calibration of Test Equipment and Instrumentation MA-408 Maintenance Facilities and Equipment
l CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
APPENDIX Page 2 RADIATION AND CHEMISTRY RC-501 Radiation Protection and Chemistry RC-502 A LARA Program RC-503 Personnel Dosimetry RC-504 Radiation Surveillance and Control RC-505 Waste and Discharge Control RC-306 Radiological Survey Equipment Control and Calibration RC-507 Personnel HP Indoctrination RC-508 Process Water Controls RC-509 Health Physics Facilities and Equipment RC-511 Respiratory Protection Program TECHNICAL SUPPORT TS-701 Technical Support Organization and Administration TS-702 Engineering Support TS-703 Nuclear Operating Experience Evaluation Program TS-704 Plant Modifications TS-705 On-Site Reactor Engineering i
O
CALVERT CLIFFS (1981)
APPENDIX Paga 3 II.
CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PERSONNEL CONTACTED Manager, Nuclear Power Department Plant Superintendent General Supervisor, Chemistry Principal Engineer, Technical Support Industrial Safety Inspector General Supervisor, Quality Assurance General Supervisor, Operations Senior Plant Operators Senior Control Room Operators Shift Supervisors Control Room Ope ators Senior Engineers Plant Operators General Supervisor, Elec;rical and Controls General Foreman, Prcduction Maintenance Department Assistant General Foreman Instrument Maintenance Supervisor Tool Equipment Foreman Welding Equipment Foreman Computer Maintenance Coordinator Principal Control Technician General Supervisor, Training and Technical Services Document Control Clerk Principal Engineer, Plant Engineering-Nuclear Supervisor, Nuclear Fuel Management Technical Librarian Engineers Engineering Technician Supervisor, Traiaing Senior Operations Instructor, Nuclear Operations Instructors, Nuclear Technical Instructor Control Electrician General Supervisor, Radiation Safety Supervisor, Radiation Control Supervisor, Radiological Support Supervisor, Dosimetry Principal Radiation-Chemistry Technicians Assistant Radiation-Chemie* y Technician Supervisor, Chemistry Chemistry Technicians Training Instructor Plant Health Physicist p
V
.v.
_,, f O
s e
S 4
1
'I 4
i b
s 1
i
% se W M $5 M ese M Wasey &nstreyurt(DAt e 869 m h M VIW MM Act W W Wie m Ttetw ww w em84 MsW w am & M ees% des et!se eerstesten e De esmes De m af 3r De emer4mee endlet4e W eacN'ts4heni#eer M Fegreut # veu '#* veu #48* 0esa esc %ess tem eyecesse e gesese ce eeneses W Gr 08meremos supetMe 4 estrwneance p $s paysseer* 90 greureps de race esist 3r amene appet vens er your eeeresentaeme Sewe Pe "We 4 ese e eaWP'compasst een fled w egrar shas 904 ave opus rweayer ce asegeeescrwsusissase De co e
ev m Ca l0 et Eases Enessespere Cescr%rurg 400 Cess== orae Ave *%e E7914 assesore *eswisseee J'302 N aesmake WA vogueens eseos e 8te '3I2 et 'ee +4 W Tie Come a Fooers W & copy a Pe reippeters meu n
4 seemmes e4 *esbest to q SA 3 M espese puest escue NeanVSA I
_ -. - - - - - - -