ML20037A652

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Radwaste & Radiation Protection for FSAR Review.Response Required by 720822
ML20037A652
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/15/1972
From: Benaroya V
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Deyoung R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8003250668
Download: ML20037A652 (3)


Text

..

-. _ m.

.e m m #c y.

y 9

-g w _._..

...A,.

. x..

'y e,; r','-

x i

w m.

.m.,.-

x mm, Doc,e: R,e.

2 JUli15 is7z Dcchet No. 50-302 Richard C. DeYoung, Assistant Director for ?reasurized Water Reactors, L Thru: Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Contairmnt Safoty, L REUEST FOR ADDITICKAL EiFOKMTICK FOR CHYST.G RIV R, UNIT 3 Attached is our request for additic.a1 infor:stion on tha Crystal River, Unit 3 F3AR. This infor= tion is rc~iuired fer our evaluation or tce raa-vasta and mdiation protection systens. The applicant chould provide the rsquire:d infairatica by Auzant 22, 1972 to mintain th) current schedule.

360=1 sloed by vt:br 3enarsta Vice.or 2enarcy*-, Chief Efflu:nt T enWt Syst-::2s 3rsuch Directorate of ".icensing Encic3nre:

As Stated ObcVe yN-DI5IEIEUTION:

,){

Ecchetfile-(50-3C-2)

L Reading CS Heading gk ETSBEeadin(-w/oenclocure)

J. Hendrie A. Gia busso (w/o enclosure) b L:TR Assistant Directors

\\N.

L:TR 3 ranch Chiefs g

A. Schwencer

's G. Dicker E. Tau 1?ner D. Sells F.Zaras(2)

J. ma'# # (w/oenclosure)

ITS 3rsnch Staff

...,5... 3.[L l.- Em.. L l A.D../,0.4-

.e ; ~ 4 emct >

1

.CTE/pv.........i...V3E".J.r~YA EEjC0

~

i suwwe >

s[.. /72,

_@j,(/72

.. s/l.5[T2.,,,

4,$,Q,0,2 c:sn [ h '

wir >

Form AIC-Sti Rev. 9-13) AECM 0240

    • o en--to-H ee-t +eMis

'~

t

y

.~.m

...~<-.-..:-...

O;

<w RADIASTE AND RADIATION PROTECTION QUESTIONS FOR CRYSTAL RIVER, UNIT 3 11.1 Provide sufficient-inforcation to clarify the following discrepancies:

a.

The annual quantity of radioicotopes released frc= the radioactive liquid vaste syste= as estimated on page 11-5a does not agree with the esti= ate given on page 11-90 and page ll-37c.

b.

The liquid vaste' disposal diagrs=, Figure 11-1,-does not agree vith

' Figure 11-1B and Figure V-12 in the Environ = ental Eeport; e.g., no mixed bed de=ineralicers.

t c.

The writeup en page 11-4b states that laundr/ vastes vill be sent to the miscellaneous vaste storage tank, if the activity is creater than10-9uC1/=1afterdilutien. Figure-11-13 shows this stres being sent to the neutralicer tank.

d.

Figure V-12 in the Enviren= ental Eeport shows the deborating de=in-eralicer reganerants being sent to the neutralizer tank. Fig"re 11-lb in the Final Safety AnaIysis Esport shovs thes= vastes being sent to the miscellaneous vaste storage tank.

11.2 On the basis of the design and operation of the proposed radvaste treat-

=ent syste=, provide estimtes of the taxi =un whole bcdy dose to an individual and the max 1=um crgan dose to an individ"*'

  • at vould be(..

received by che general public at the site boundarf as a result of the release of liquid.and gaseous effluents.

11 3 Figure 11-2a dees net show the turbine building, reactor building purge, and the condenser vacuu= pu=p air ejector release path.

Provide.a revised figure to show these release paths.

11.4 Provide additional details on the reactor building pt.rge exhaust duct (R=-A1) and the auxiliar/ building and fuel handling area exhaust duct (R=-A2) conitors, including, the distance of conitoring filter ele =ents

^

from the exhaust stream and the bases for this distance,'the location.

of the sample intake in the exhaust stream and bases for this locaticn.

i 11 5 Your present design per=its =anual readjustment of alar = set-points prior to planned gaseous releases. Justiff why you do not need to use a technique for reasuring planned releases that does not interfere with, alar = set-points.

11.6 rescribe the capability in the plant of caking periodic isotopic analyses co= parable to those outlined in Safety Guide 21 of noble gases, iodines, par iculates, and liquids released to environment.

gML

/

~-

~

.m_,m,_._

m

m...m. m-.

-7

+. -

- _ ~ ~.. -... _ _. ~. _ _.

w.----

- - +

O r

)

2-11 7 For each logical grouping of instruments,.descrite the calibratien and preventive raintenance operations to be used.

11.8 Descrite the opemtional characteristics of radiation =cnitors, including (and their basesh, sensitivity, range, rethod of calibration, set-points type of detector the cri eria used to determine necessity for and ~

location of the rcnitors.

11 9 Provide an esti=ste of the' yearly onsite tan-rem exposures from the

.s plant. Cc= pare the esti=ated doses with experience from relevant-operating plants.

f r

a s

q 4

s 1

6 h

c' 6.

s.

, HED

~

4 6

i#

a

^

__i_m.___m______

___________._m_.

_ _