ML20037A461
| ML20037A461 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee |
| Issue date: | 04/02/1976 |
| From: | Goller K, Purple R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20037A462 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001310628 | |
| Download: ML20037A461 (4) | |
Text
, _ -
s t. o!
m I
- /vI NOTICING OF PEOPOSED LMF'.':M *"21 87
.e I.!CTSc~r:
Duke Power Cc=pany s
Technical Specification changes to reflect the analyses REQUEST FOR:
perfor=ed for Oconee Unit 2 Cycle 2 reload.
t REQUEST DXIE:
February 25, 1976 PROPOSED ACTICS:
( X)
Prc-notice Reccc:: ended
( )
Post-not. ice de:cm.cnded s
( )
De:cr=ination ticl:tyed pendini:
corpictica -i dai'c:y.caluntion BASIS FOR DECITION:
Changes introduced in the Cycle 2 reload include the fellevin; 1)
A change in the rese:or variable icv pressure tric, 2)
The use of nessured pr. sry cociant flev rea::or :n:n design flew in the :acr:al-hyd::uli: desi:n analysis, 3)
The application of the BNJ-2 Critical F.ea: Flux (C:!?)
Correlatien ra:her :han :he W-3 correla:Len as used in Cycle 1, and D OfTp 4)
Two 17 x 17 F.srk C desenstratica fu'el asse=b'.ies.
GQ Ite
- 1) above invol/es a rels:ca:ica of a li=itinz safety OM~Q~}A systr. setting; ::::a 2) and 3) aseve involve changes :o q
the bases fer :he :2:ent:21 s:ecific2:tonc: :ne, ::e= a pJ_u-J above involves the uce ci two fuel asse blies si:nifican:lv differen: frem th:s e ':eing rep' ced.
In view of the aseve, it is concluded tha: tha tr:pesed a end:ent involves sig.i-fican: hazards cens-ders:icns anc a Fre-no: ice is :nerefere recc= ended J
1 CONCURRENCES:
DATE:
Concurrence in PD constitutes 1,
a concurrence in Ltr to Licensee hD,Th f.
Y 2[ 7[
and Federal Register Notice 2,
M'(
d /]/>g S.
K. "
411er 4.
OELD, g/ '
Gj
,y'_ C -i
~
e i
1 8001
g
-m 3,I **,'
(f
-x a
_2_
PROPOSED NEPA ACIION:
( )
EIS Required
( ) Negative Declaration (ND) and Environmental Impact Appraisal (EIA) Required (X ) No EIS, ND or EIA Required
( )
Determination delayed pending completion of EIA BASIS FOR DECISION:
'a'e have deter =ined that the a=cndment does not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level and vill not result in any significant environ-mental i= pact.
Having =ade this determination, we have further concluded that the amend ent involves an actica which is insignificant from the standpoint of environ = ental i= pact and pursuant to 10 CFR 551.5(d)(1) that an enviren= ental-statement, negative declaration, or enviren= ental impact appraisal need not be preparec in connection with the issuance o,f this a:end:ent.
D OM
~
oWb og-old JD.Likl_
k e
9
q Oconee Technical Specificatiens - 4.11 4 ~.'11.1
. Change.to read.- Envircamental sanples taken in accordance-with-Table 2-la of' the FSAR shall be ' collected and processed in accordance with Table 4.11-1 of these specifications.
4'.11.3 Add specification "The location of cows and/or go~ats use'd as a direct source of milk for individuals, and the location of dairies within five miles of the plant will be determined annually by survey and reporced with the results -of the radiological environmental. monitoring-p rogram.
Table 4.11-1 Incorporate the followin's changes :
a)
Change Schedule for Air Particulate from " Monthly" to
" Monthly, charcoal filter-weekly."
b)
Change Schedule for Xilk from " Quarterly" to " Weekly."
c)
Add to Analvsis for Water. Rain, Settled Dust, and Air.
Particulate. gamma analysis on quarterly composite samples.
d)
Add to Analvsis for Air Particulate, gamma analysis
[
for I-131.
e)
Add to Analysis for Veeetation, Terrestrial ~, Aquatic Organisms, and Bottom Sediment, gamma analysis quarterly.
f' f)
Change footnote from "* Dependent on gross activity"' to
"* Dependent on gross activity for individual samples."'
4 f
U j
d 10 4
.a
- mm.
m-
.. m*..
m
.s
-