ML20034H796
| ML20034H796 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 03/12/1992 |
| From: | Beverly Clayton NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20034H787 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-254-93-04, 50-254-93-4, 50-265-93-04, 50-265-93-4, NUDOCS 9303220086 | |
| Download: ML20034H796 (1) | |
Text
..
i y-i
- i
- f NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265 i
Quad Cities Units'I and 2 License Nos._DPR-29; DPR-30,,
l
?
?
~
During an NRC inspection conducted on January 12'through February ~22, 1993, a t
violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the. General d
Statement of Policy and Procedure.for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2,
_ j l
Appendix C (1992), the following violation is listed below*
Technical Specifications 4.5.C.5 and 4.5.E.5, High Pressure Coolant Injection Subsystem (HPCI) and Reactor Core' Isolation Cooling. (RCIC) respectively, require a logic system functional test at each refueling outage. Technical Specification 1.k, Definitions, defines a logic 1
system functional test as a test of all relays.and contacts of a logic circuit from sensor to activated device, to ensure operability per design intent.
Contrary to the above, from initial operation until' February 5,1993,.
the licensee did not-perform logic system functional tests' for-the automatic suction transfer circuit for the HPCI and RCIC systems.
- This is a Severity-Level IV violation (Supplement 1).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth Edison Company is hereby required to submit a written statement.of explanation'to the U.S.-.
Nuclear. Regulatory Commission,' ATTN: Document-Control Desk, Washington D.C.
3 20555 with a copy to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,: Region III 799 Roosevelt Road, Glen Ellyn, Illinois, 60137,' and a copy to the NRC L.
j Resident Inspector at the Quad Cities Nuclear Station within 30 days of the. - -
1 date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation:(Notice). This reply _
l should be clearly marked as a " Reply to _a-Notice of Violation" and should.
include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the. violation or, if-contested, the basis for disputing the violation,l(2)~the corrective steps that have_been taken and the results achieved,-(3) the-corrective' steps'that will be taken to avoid further violations,'and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply isLnot received within the-i time specified. in this Notice, an. order or a demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended,.or revoked, or--
why such other action'as may.be proper should not be'taken. Where: good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
q
-i 0
Dated at Glen Ellyn, Illinois Brent Clayton, Chief _
this 3 2. day of MMz/.
1992 Reactor Projects Branch-1 j
9303220086 930312 4
=PDR ADOCK 05000254 0"
PDR-.
t