ML20034H192
| ML20034H192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 03/11/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20034H186 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-446-92-60, NUDOCS 9303160149 | |
| Download: ML20034H192 (2) | |
Text
..-
s.
APPENDIX A i
.I 10 Electric Docket:
50-446 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unit 2 Construction Permit: CPPR-127 During an NRC inspection conducted on December 6, 1992, through January 30, 1993, violations of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the
" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violations are listed below:
~
i A.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, states, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be accomplished in accordance with procedures of a type appropriate to the circumstances.
Operations Department Administrative Procedure ODA-410, " System Status Control," Revision 4, Section 6, states, in part, that the documentation t
of.the position of components other than that specified in the system status file will be maintained within the document controlling the activity that repositioned the component.
Contrary to the above, on December 30, 1992, several valves in the chemical and volume control system were not in the positions specified by the document controlling the activity that repositioned the component.
This is a Severity Level IV violation.
(Supplement II) (446/9260-01) j B.
Appendix B of 10 CFR Part 50, Criterion V, states, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures of a type appropriate to the circumstances-and that procedures shall include appropriate acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.
Contrary to the above, the licensee did not incorporate Valves 2RH-0031 t
and 2RH-0032 into the valve lineup in Procedure SOP-102B, " Residual Heat Removal System," and, consequently, the valves' positions had not been verified on the valve lineup contained in the active system status file.
l This is a Severity Level IV violation. -(Supplement II) (446/9260-02)
[
C.
Appendix B of 10 CFR Part 50, Criterion XVI, states, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions. adverse to quality, such as deficiencies, are promptly identified and corrected.
Contrary to the above, following the identification of abnormal operating procedure deficiencies on two separate occasions, the licensee did not identify.and implement effective corrective actions regarding i
additional abnormal operating procedural deficiencies. Specifically, Procedure ABN-104, " Residual Heat Removal System Malfunctions," directed 9303160149 930311
{DR ADOCK 05000445 PDR
~
the operator to manipulate valves in Unit 2 when the valve numbers referenced in the procedure were applicable only to Unit 1.
/i This is a Severity Level IV violation.
(Supplement II) (446/9260-03)
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR Part 2.201, TV Electric is hereby l
required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATIN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested,-the basis for disputing the violation; (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved;-(3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations; and (4) the date when full compliance will' be achieved. -If an adequate reply is not i
received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for-information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
l Dated at Arlington, Texas,
/
thisfjg' day of ff g 2b 1993 f
5 T
i 5
I