ML20034F224

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses SALP Repts 50-324/92-30 & 50-325/92-30 & Subsequent 930114 Meeting.Meeting Summary,Salp Slides, Response to SALP Repts & Errata Sheet for Final SALP Rept Encl
ML20034F224
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/1993
From: Ebneter S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Watson R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 9303020424
Download: ML20034F224 (31)


See also: IR 05000324/1992030

Text

,

_ _ - - _ _ - - _

,

FJ lig^ i'*'

g [g _

  • 2

.

G laf

L&[

^

FEB- 2 2 1993

,

.

Docket Nos.: 50-325, 50-324

y

'

' License Nos.: DPR-71,lDPR-62

Carolina Power:and Light Company

-

ATTN: Mr. R. A. Watson

Senior Vice President

b

Nuclear Generation

P. O. Box 1551

Raleigh, NC 27602

R

'

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE

(NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-325/92-30 AND 50-324/92-30)

L

'This refers to the NRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)

i

Report for your Brunswick facility which was-sent to you on December 30, 1992;

our meeting of January 14, 1993, at which time we discussed this report; and

your written comments dated February 12, 1993.

p'

We have reviewed your written comments and note-that you-have;taken no issue.

. with the assessment described in the~ Initial: Report. Therefore, the

r

! December 30, 1992, report' constitutes the Final SALP Report.

p

We have noted your planned actions to achieve improved performance as

i

established in the Brunswick Nuclear Plant Three-Year Plan'(1993 - 1995),- the

CP&L Corporate' Improvement Initiatives and the Brunswick Unit I and Unit 2

'

"

Integrated Startup-Schedules. We will be monitoring and assessing.

improvemer_ts particularly in the functional areas 'of Mainter.ance/ Surveillance

R

and Safety Assessment / Quality Verification.'

'i

No response to this letter is required; however, should you have any questions

concerning this matter, I will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

Original signed by:

Stewart D. Ebneter

Stewart D. Ebneter

Regional Administrator

,

p

E

Enclosures:

2

1.

January 14, 1993

Meeting Summary

2.

January 14, 1993

~

!

SALP Slides

P

-3.

CP&L Response to

SALP Reports-

q

4. - Errata Sheet for Final

'

SALP Report

-

4

ce;w/encls:

(See page 2),

m

PDR' ADOCK'05000324"

- l

930302042+ 930222 '

-

$

LG

PDR =: A,

1

e -

.

. _ _ .

_______________

.-

'

>

l

.

Carolina Power and Light Company

2

Frg p p, pyg3

cc w/cncls:

R. A. Anderson

Vice President

Brunswick Nuclear Project

P. O. Box 10429

-

Southport, NC 28461

R. E. Morgan

Plant Manager Unit 1

Brunswick Steam Electric Plant

P. O. Box 10429

Southport, NC 28461

M. Brown

Plant Manager Unit 2

Brunswick Steam Electric Plant

P. O. Box 10429

Southport, NC 28461

-

H. Ray Starling

Vice President - Legal Department

Carolina Power and Light Co.

P. O. Box 1551

Raleigh, NC 27602

Kelly Holden

Board of Commissioners

P. O. Box 249

Bolivia, NC 28422

Chrys Bageett

State Clear nghouse

Budget anu Management

116 West Jones Street

Raleigh, NC 27603

Dayne H. Brown, Director

Division of Radiation Protection

N. C. Department of Environment,

Health & Natural Resources

P. O. Box 27687

Raleigh, NC 27611-7687

H. A. Cole

Special Deputy Attorney General

State of North Carolina

P. O. Box 629

Raleigh, NC 27602

(cc w/encls cont'd - See page 3)

e

_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _

_

____ .

..

,

,.

. ' .

FEB 2 2 !993

Carolina Power and Light Company

3

(cc w/encls cont'd)

Robert-P. Gruber

Executive Director

Public Staff - NCUC

P. O. Box 29520

Raleigh, NC 27626-0520

Ms. Gayle B. Nichols

Staff Counsel

SC Public Service Commission

P. O. Box 11649

Columbia, SC 29211

bec w/encis:

Eacument Control Desk

NRC Resident Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Star Route 1, Box 208

Southpart, NC 28461

The Chairman

K. C. Rogers, Commissioner

J. R. Curtiss, Commissioner

F. J. Remick, Commissioner

E. G. de Planque, Commissioner

J. M. Taylor, EDO

H. H. Sniezek, DEDO

L. R. Plisco, Regional Coordinator, EDO

T. E. Murley, NRR

S. Varga, NRR

E. G. Adensam, NRR

R. H. Lo, NRR

F. Allenspach, SALP Coordinator, NRR

Regional Administrators, RI, RIII

RIV, and RV

,

K. Clark, RII, PA0

D. M. Verrelli, DRP, RII

R. E. Carroll, DRP, RII

S. J. Vias, TSS, RII

DRS and DRSS Branch Chiefs,

and Section Chiefs

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

RII:DRP

RII:DRP

RII:DRP

RII:0RA

  • DVerrelli:tj * JJohnson
  • EMerschoff
  • LReyes

02/ /93

02/ /93

02/ /93

02/ /93

.-

____-

.

_ _ ______ _ _ __--_

.

.

_

_

- .

..

l

v

,

FEB 2 21993

l

,-

. . .

1

Carolina Power and Light Company.

3

l

(cc w/ enc 1's' cont'd)

Robert P. Gruber

Executive Director

Public Staff - NCUC

,

P. O. Box 29520

Raleigh, NC 27626-0520

t

L

Ms. Gayle B. Nichols

'

Staff Counsel

SC Public Service Commission

,

P. O. Box 11649

t

Columbia, SC 29211

bcc w/encls:

Document Control Desk

,

NRC Resident Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Star Route 1, Box 208

.

'

Southport, NC 28461

4 Chairman Sc!*n

K. C. Rogers, Commissioner

t

J. R. Curtiss, Commissioner

,

F. J. Remick, Commissioner

E. G. de Planque, Commissioner

J.'M. Taylor, ED0

H. H. Sniezek, DEDO

~

L. R. Plisco, Regional Coordinator, ED0

T. E. Murley, NRR

S. Varga, NRR

E. G. Adensam, NRR

R. H. Lo, NRR

F. Allenspach, SALP Coordinator, NRR

i

Regional Administrators, RI, RIII

RIV, and RV

K. Clark, RII, PA0

D. M. Verrelli, DRP, RII

R. E. Carroll, DRP, RII

S. J. Vias, TSS, RII

DRS and DRSS Branch Chiefs,

and Section Chiefs

L

5

RII:DR

RII: RP

RI :DRP

RII RA

,

y

lYy

.

DVe

relli:tj

JJ nson

EMerschoff

>yes

02/g/93

02/9/93

y 02/ w/93

p /JM3

'

c,

.

..,

,

..

ENCLOSURE 1

Meeting Summary

A.

A meeting was held at.1:00 p.m. on January 14, 1993, at.the Brunswick:

Visitor's Center near Southport, North Carolina to discuss the SALP Board

Report for'the Brunswick facility.

B.

Licensee Attendees

S. H. Smith, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive 0fficer-

W. Cavanaugh III, President and Chief Operating Officer

R. A. Watson, Senior Vice President

R. A. Anderson, Vice President Brunswick Nuclear Project

R. E. Morgan, Plant Manager, Unit I

J. M. Brown, Plant Manager Unit 2

A. M. Lucas, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering Department

J. P. Cowan, Manager, Technical and Regulatory Support

C.

NRC Attendees

S. D.. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)

J. R. Johnson, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII

E. G. Adensam, Director, Project Director II-I, Officer of Nuclear

Reactor Regulation

(NRR)

P. D. Milano, Project Manager, DO 11-1, NRR

R. H. Lo, Project Manager, PH I, I, NRR-

H. O. Christensen, Chief, DRP Section IA

R. L. Prevatte, Senior Resident Inspector, Brunswick

R. E. Carroll, Project Engineer, DRP, IA, RII

D. J. Nelson, Resident Inspector - Brunswick

P. M. Byron, Resident Inspector - Brunswick

- . . _ .

_

-

.

.

7. .

%-

'

ENCLOSURE 2

,

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

.

.

pw# "#*%,

p

go

a

,

b

G

'

  • a af

SYSTEMATIC

ASSESSMENT

,

OF

LICENSEE

PERFORMANCE

(SALP)

,

e,

--

..

,

-

..

.

.

.

CAROLINA POWER. AND LIGHT

SALP CYCLE 11

-.

NOVEMBER 3,1991-

THROUGH

OCTOBER 31, 1992

.

A

BRUNSWICK

1

JANUARY 14,1992

1

..

-*-.a.. .

w

-

.me

, , , ,

w

.:

i

.

-

.

SALP PROGRAM OBJECTIVES

.

__

1. IDENTIFY TRENDS IN

g

LICENSEE PERFORMANCE

2. PROVIDE A BASIS FOR

ALLOCATION OF

NRC RESOURCES

.

.

f

3. IMPROVE NRC

REGULATORY PROGRAM

.

.

l

..

.-.

.

.

-

. . -

.

.

.

.

.

-

7

.

":

,

.

.

.

REGION

ll

<

ORGANIZATION

'

,

,

f -

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

,

ADMINISTRATOR S.EBNETER

DEPUTY L.REYES

[

e

l

--

DIVISION OF

DIVISION OF

DIVISION OF

REACTOR PROJECTS

REACTOR SAFETY

RADIATION SAFETY

AND SAFEGUARDS

DIR. E. MERSCH0FF

DIR.

A. GIBSON

DIR.

J. STOHR -

DEPUTY J. JOHNSON

DEPUTY (VACANT)

DEPUTY B. MALLETT

.

_

.

.-.

-

,

..

..

._

.

.

-

.

x. .

,

i

.

..

.

.

.

.

'

DIVIS ON.0F REACTOR PROJEC

S

.

ORGANIZATION

!

,

DIVISION OF

'

REACTOR PROJECTS

i

'

DIR. E. MERSCHOFF-

'

DEPUTY J. JOHNSON

-

l

REACTOR PROJECTS

BRANCH NO.1

i

!

i

CHIEF

D.VERRELLI

.

,

l

-l

)

PROJECTS SECTION

PROJECTS SECTION

NO.1A

NO.1B

CHIEF

CHIEF

H. CHRISTENSEN

F. CANTRELL'

i

FARLEY

ROBINSON

GRAND GULF

SUMMER

HARRIS

i

BRUNSWICK - SRI

D. PREVATTE

I

--

-

-

- .

-

-

r_

,

.

.

. :

..

.

o

"

.

_

~

NRR ORGANIZATION

I

OFFICE OF

NUCLEAR REACTOR

REGU LATION

DIR.

T. MURLEY

ASSOC. DIRECTOR

ASSOC. DIRECTOR

ASSOC DIRECTOR

" ^

^"

FOR PROJECTS

- FOR INSPECTION AND

g 4CTORS AND

J.- PARTLOW

TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT

LICENSE RENEWAL

DIVISION 'OF

'

REACTOR PROJECTS I/11

S. VARG A, DIR.- 1/11

G. LAINAS, ASST DIR.~ll

E.ADENSAM,

DIR.11/1

R. LO ' PROJ. MG R., .

BRUNSWICK -

4-

W *

a--

-

2.-=1

s

..

. '

.2

--._.,._,a

w

,#

,,v.

..y%,

y

y

, ...

w.

,. ~ , , , . .,

-a

,m__m.__

_ _,._ ..,

_m%,_

.-

.

.

-

--

-

.

>

.

!

-

.,

t

PERFORMANCE ANALYSISLAREAS

FOR OPERATING REACTORS

i

,

.

. ,

,

A. PLANT OPERATIONS

,

B. RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS

.

1

'

.,

C. MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE

,

D. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

j

'

E. SECURITY

F. ENGINEERING / TECHNICAL SUPPORT

,

G. SAFETY ASSESSMENT / QUALITY

VERIFICATION

1

..

c

--

,

'

1

.

..

~

.

AREA PERFORMANCE

CATEGORY 1

.

LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION TO

.

.

.

AND INVOLVEMENT IN NUCLEAR SAFETY

OR SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES RESULTED

^

IN A SUPERIOR LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE.

NRC WILL CONSIDER REDUCED LEVELS

OF INSPECTION EFFORT.

g

.

AREA PERFORMANCE

CATEGORY 2

LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION TO

AND INVOLVEMENT IN NUCLEAR SAFETY

OR SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES RESULTED

IN A GOOD LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE.

NRC WILL CONSIDER MAINTAINING

'

NORMAL LEVELS OF INSPECTION

EFFORT.

.

'

.

.

.

-

.

.

~

.

?

AREA PERFORMANCE

CATEGORY 3

LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION TO

'

AND INVOLVEMENT IN NUCLEAR SAFETY

OR SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES RESULTED

t

IN AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE;

HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF THE NRC'S CONCERN

THAT A DECREASE IN PERFORMANCE MAY

APPROACH OR REACH AN UNACCEPTABLE

LEVEL, NRC WILL CONSIDER INCREASED

LEVELS OF INSPECTION EFFORT.

l

. .- -

---.u-----.-


~- --- ----.--

-

-

w-

-

-

.

1

.

.

.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

>l

1. MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT AND CONTROL

-

IN ASSURING QUALITY

2. APPROACH TO IDENTIFICATION AND

RESOLUTION OF TECHNICAL ISSUES

,

FROM A SAFETY STANDPOINT

.

3. ENFORCEMENT HISTORY

4. REPORTING, ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE

ACTION OF REPORTABLE EVENTS

5. STAFFING (INCLUDING MANAGEMENT)

6. TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS AND

QUALIFICATION

.

.

SUMMARY OF

-

.

BRUNSWICK'S PERFORMANCE

(11/3/91 - 10/31/92)

- EARLY PORTION (DECLINE)

EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS

1

-

INADEQUATE WORK CONTROLS

POOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

~.

- MIDDLE PORTION (PLATEAU)

INSTABILITY OF ORGANIZATION

LACK OF MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN

PROBLEM RESOLUTION

- LATTER PORTION (SLOW IMPROVEMENT)

SOME PROGRESS TOWARDS RECOVERY

CORPORATE-TO-STATION INTERFACES

SELF-ASSESSMENT:

POSITIVE INDICATIONS *

OFFSET BY INEFFECTIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

OVERALL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM:

MAJOR

CONCERN; LARGE BACKLOG, EMERGING

WORK AND INEFFECTIVE WORK CONTROL /'

VERIFICATION IMPEDING PROGRESS

,

.

-.

.

.

'

,

,

.

[

'

PLANT OPERATIONS

'

{CK EGO 9Y 2)

'

OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA

,

i

REMAINED GOOD

STRENGTHS

  • OPERATOR PERFORMANCE DURING TRIPS AND

POWER MANEUVERS

  • KNOWLEDGE OF SYSTEMS AND EMERGENCY

PROCEDURES

  • REQUALIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

CHALLENGES

'

  • SCHEDULING AND OVERSIGHT FOR UNPLANNED

OUTAGE RECOVERY

  • INTERFACES WITH WORK CONTROL AND

'

PLANNING

COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS

s

-

.

,

.,

.

u

.

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS

(CATEGO 9Y 2, M 390V \\ G;

.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA

,

REMAINED GOOD

,1

STRENGTHS

i

  • STABLE AND WEL_-QUALIFIED ORGANIZATION

. - .

  • EFFECTIVE COLLECTIVE DOSE CONTROL
  • AGGRESSIVE SOURCE TERM REDUCTION EFFORTS

'

  • SPENT FUEL POOL CLEANUP
  • LIQUID AND GASEOUS EFFLUENT CONTROLS

i

RADWASTE SHIPPING AND TRANSPORTATION

i

CHALLENGES

CONTAMINATION EVENT

i

CONTINUED REDUCTION OF CONTAMINATED

SURFACE AREA AND SOURCE TERM

,

,

,,.

- . - -

, . - - -

,

.

.

4

V A \\TEls ANCE/SL RVEILLANCE

l CATEGOlY 3}

'

<

OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA

'

REMAINED ACCEPTABLE

,

STRENGTHS

  • REDUCED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SURVEILLANCE

PROGRAM

IMPROVED EDG MAINTENANCE

CHALLENGES

  • WORK CONTROL RELATED PROBLEMS
  • CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE

MAINTENANCE BACKLOG

MATERIAL CONDITION OF PLANT

  • EQUIPMENT FAILURES

.

-

_

..

.-

.

7. --

.

.

u

'

i

VIAINTENANCE/ SURVEILLANCE

l

.

(coh

])

a

RECOMMENDATIONS

n

POOR MAINTENANCE PRACTICES AND DEFERRED-

!

MAINTENANCE ADVERSELY AFFECTED

i

PERFORMANCE IN SEVERAL FUNCTIONAL AREAS.

j

SIGNIFICANT MANAGEMENT ATTENTION IS

i

WARRANTED.

~~

i

!

i

f

!

-

-

-

.

_.

.

t

EVIERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

(CATEGORY 2}

OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA

REMAINED GOOD

..

STRENGTHS

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT AND STAFF COMMITMENT

..

  • WORKING RELATIONSHIP WITH STATE AND

'

LOCAL OFFSITE AGENCIES

AUDIT PROGRAM

1

CHALLENGES

  • TRAINING OF RESPONSE PERSONNEL

-RESPONSE TO NON-RADIOLOGICAL HAZARDS

,

%

i

.

-

,.

.

~

.

r

SECURITY

(CA

EGO RY 2j'

-

.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA

d

REMAINED GOOD

.

STRENGTHS

  • PROFESSIONALISM OF SECURITY FORCE

- .

  • SECURITY TRAINING PROGRAM

EFFECTIVE FITNESS-FOR-DUTY PROGRAM

,

CHALLENGES

,

.

  • MAINTENANCE OF SECURITY EQUIPMENT

COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN PLANT SUPPORT

AND SECURITY STAFFS

CONTROL OF VEHICLES AND ESCORTED

PERSONNEL

i

i

e

v

-

n

-

,-

.

.

.

.

ENGINEERING /

TECH \\llCAL SUPPORT

(CATEGO 9Y 2}

,

OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA

REMAINED GOOD

STRENGTHS

KNOWLEDGE AND INVOLVEMENT OF SYSTEM

ENGINEERS

  • LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING

SUPPORT TO STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION

PROGRAMS

CHALLENGES

  • DESIGN CONTROL
  • BACKLOG OF ENGINEERING WORK

'

TIMELY AND THOROUGH ENGINEERING

EVALUATION / RESOLUTION OF IDENTIFIED

DEFICIENCIES

,

+,-

m

. - ~ .

_

-

.

.

-

.

SAFETY ASSESSMENT /

QUALITY VERIFICATION

(CA~~ EGO RY 3}

J

OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA

REMAINED ACCEPTABLE

STRENGTHS

RESPONSE TO GENERIC INDUSTRY ISSUES

  • SITE INCIDENT INVESTIGATION TEAM PROCESS
  • IDENTIFICATION OF DEFICIENCIES-

l

CHALLENGES

EFFECTIVE SELF-ASSESSMENT / CORRECTIVE

ACTION PROGRAM

i

.

STANDARDS FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE

- QUALITY ASSURANCE / OVERSIGHT OF

CONTRACTOR WORK

'

,

m

.

-.

_

- ,

.

SAFETY ASSESSMENT /

QUAL TY VERIFICATIOh

l:cor])

L

RECOMMENDATIONS

,

DESPITE PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION, MINIMAL

CORRECTIVE ACTION FOLLOWUP AND

'

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT LIMITED EFFECTIVENESS

OF SELF-ASSESSMENTS. MANAGEMENT ATTENTION

IS WARRANTED.

.

,

s

-

.

_ - _ _

.

_.

-

,

-e.

-e.

..

-..

,

SALP RATING SUMMARY

SALP CYCLES 10 AND 11

FUNCTIONAL

RATING

RATING

' AREA

LAST PERIOD

THIS PERIOD

OPERATIONS

2

2

RAD CONTROL

2 (IMPROVING)

2 (IMPROVING)

MAINT/SURV

3

3

EMER PREP

2-

2

SECURITY:

2

2

ENGR / TECH

2

2

SA/QV

3

3

U

  • J,

.

'

Form 244

.

Carohna Power & Light Company

. -... - .<.

..

M7./ 4 A

February 12,1993

-

company correspondence

"

eO

,,

FILE:

BG9-13510

'

SERIAL: BSEP-93-0023

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ATTENTION: Document Control Desk

Washington, DC 20555

BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NOS.1 AND 2

--

DOCKET NOS. 50 325 & 30-324/ LICENSE NOS. DPR-71 & DPR-62

.

RESPONSE TO NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-325/92-30 AND 50-324/92-30

INITIAL SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE

.

Gentlemen:

The purpose of this letter is to provide Carolina Power & Light Company's (CP&L)

comments concerning the initial Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)

Board Report forwarded by your letter of December 30,1992 (Inspection Report Nos. 50-

325/92-30 and 50-324/92-30). This report provided results for the Brunswick Steam

Electric Plant, Unit Nos.1 and 2 (BSEP) from the evaluation period of November 3,1991

through October 31,1992.

The Company acknowledges the NRC's assessment of our performance in the functional

areas evaluated and will use the observations and findings summarized in the report in our

efforts to improve our overall performance. We are in agreement with the NRC finding

that the plant was generally operated in a safe and conservative manner during the SALP

period.

The Company recognizes the need for improvement in the performance of BSEP, The

BSEP management team and CP&L Corporate . Headquarters have established objectives for

BSEP in accordance with the Brunswick Nuclear Plant Three-Year Plan (1993-1995) (BSEP-

92-0051 dated December 15,1992); the Corporate Improvement initiatives in the CP&L

Nuclear improvement Plan (NLS-92-317 dated November 30,1992); and the Brunswick

Unit 1 and Brunswick Unit 2 Integrated Startup Schedules (BSEP 92-0061 dated

December 30,1992 and BSEP 92-0046 dated November 30,1992). These objectives will

expedite improvement at BSEP and are characterized by achieving higher standards of

performance, site and individual accountability, effective planning, and continuous

improvement. The BSEP management team has developed a vision for the plant and the

plant organization, to be achieved over the next three years, which is intended to establish

the capability for BSEP to achieve "world-class" results.

nn77

,y

~ 3 +[ '.,'- ,.

hl

'd

'

'

,

, _ _ .

.,

t~u

,

.

- _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _

{-a

., ,

i .

NLS 93-034 / Page 2

'

,

Development of the Company's Corporate Improvement Initiatives, as well as the

comprehensive improvement plans at BSEP, are steps designed to achieve sustained '

improvement at BSEF. Additional measures, suct. as establishing a Nuclear Safety

Oversight Committee reporting to management and the Board of Directors, and a Nuclear

Safety Review Committee at BSEP, will assist CP&L management in developing and

maintaining a higher level of safety awareness at BSEP. Carolina Fower & Light Company

is committed to continue to provide appropriate management attention to ensure that good

performance is maintained in the functional areas cited in the subject SALP report, and to

enhance performance in the areas of equipment problems, work controls, corrective

actions, and rnaintenance. We are confident that improvements will be demonstrated

during the upcoming SALP period.

- :.

.

Yours very"truly,

W

-

R. A. Anderson

{Vice President

1

Bruns $vick Nuclear Plant

JCP/shc (BSEP-93-0023)

cc:

Mr. S. D. Ebneter

Mr. P. D. Milano

Mr. R. L. Prevatte

1.

= _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

____-_ - _____-_________-___-_

___ - ___- _ - -

.-

c:.

.:,

_

1._ . . . .

.

..
k .

NLS 93-034 / Page 3

bec:

Mr. R. A. Anderson

Mr. M. A. Jones

T. A. Baxter. Esq.

Mr. L.1. Loflin

Mr. E. A. Bishop

Mr. A. M. Lucas

Mr. M, D. Bradley

Mr. R. E. Morgan

Mr. J. M. Brown

Mr. E. M. Northeim

Mr. R. K. Buckles (LIS)

Mr. H. A. Pollock

Mr. S. H. Callis

Mr. W. W. Simpson

Mr. I1. S. Calvert

Mr. R. S. Stancil '

Mr. R. M. Coats

Mr. G. H. Warriner

Mr. R. C. Godley

Mr. D. B. Waters

Mr. J. L Harness

Mr. R. A. Watson

Mr. E. M. Harris

Mr. E. E. Willett

Mr. J. D. Heidt

File: BC/A-4

Mr. W. G. Hindman

File: B-X-0544.1

File: B X-0544.5

-

-

7

-.

- .n,.....-

. .< ;

(

.

.: 4

ENCLOSURE 4

ERRATA-SHEET FOR FINAL SALP REPORT

Page

Line

Report Reads

Final Report Reads

'

Coversheet

2

Interim SALP Report-

Final SALP. Report -

!

,

!

.

I

I

i

r

i

h

.,

-

'

t

i

_ -

'

I

1

r

1

!

i

.I

-

.

.

-

.