ML20033C136
| ML20033C136 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bellefonte  |
| Issue date: | 11/09/1981 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, NUDOCS 8112020712 | |
| Download: ML20033C136 (2) | |
Text
_ _.
\\I s
. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTgTTEGION ::
r CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEh hdo A. O E O F+i t.
400 Chestnut Street Tower II 31 NOV 13 A 8 : 23 November 9, 1981
(\\\\g> },g -
BLRD-50-438/81-47 7
BLRD-50-439/81-50 s
,, f. %. 3 s
=b Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director
[
Office of Inspection and Enforcement DE01 1981* C
-f U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-Region II.-' Suite 3100 Q1 #* MmD -
101 Marietta Street se p
Atlanta, Georgia g
A
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR' PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - TOLERANCE FOR TUBULAR STEEL CABLE TRAY HANGERS - BLRD-50-438/81-47, BLRD-50-439/81 SECOND INTERIM REPORT The subject deficiency was initially reported to NRC-0IE Inspector R. V. Celenjak on July 16, 1981'in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e) as NCR 1478. This was followed by our first interim report dated August'14, 1981._ Enclosed is our second interim report. We expect to submit our-next' report by January 28, 1982.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with R. H. Shell at FTS 858-2688.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY I.
L. M. Mills, Manager Nuclear Regulation and Safety Enclosure cc:
Mr. Victor Stello, Jr., Director (Enclosure)
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 OhTICIAL Ch -
f 8112020712 911109' DR ADOCK 05000 g 87 b/
An Equal Opportunity Employer j
I ENCLOSURE BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 TOLERANCE FOR TUBULAR STEEL CABLE TRAY HANGERS BLRD-50-438/81-47, BLRD-50-439/81-50 10 CFR 50.55(e)
SECOND INTERIM REPORT Description of Conditi jn Because of misunderstanding between the Bellefonte design project and Bellefonte field forces, the field forces fabricated and installed cable tray hangers outside the tolerances allowed by the seismic analysis.
Interim Progress TVA has identified those supports that were modified outside the tolerances without a Field Change Request to approve the modification.
This ir. formation, along with a description of each deviation, is being reviewed by TVA on a case-by-case basis. Any modification required to ensure seismic qualification will be made, s
,k 4
I e
.