ML20033B321
| ML20033B321 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 11/12/1981 |
| From: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Carey J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112010234 | |
| Download: ML20033B321 (3) | |
Text
.
i DISTRIBUTION
- w/ encl.
Docket *
NSIC TERA Docket No. 50-334 ORB #1 Rdg gj x DEisenhut o
/ RiN 0 ELD IE-3*
@.r P[,h [N/ 'JL t
)M Mr. J. J. Camy. Vice President ACRS-10*
Duquesne Light Company j,p i
0 GMcCorkle*
Nuclear Division
,NOW7198fe h.
JMiller*
Post Office Box 4 y
Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Q
v.s. g g g g w r Svarga DChaney IL
//
CParrish i
Dear Mr. Carey; f,
O Gray File i
We have reviewed the changes to the security rff the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 1 as submitted by your letters of May 19,and July 30, 1981.
Although some of the changes am appropriate under the provisions of 10 CFR i
50.54(p), others either decrease security or contain insuffucuent infomation upon which to base a decision. Those changes that have been detemined-to decmase security or contain insufficient infomation am listed in enclosure A, along with staff consents mlative to the action that must be taken to resolve the issues in question. _You can consider all other proposed changes to be acceptable under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p).
Please submit revised pages to your plan incorporating only those changes which we have acc4pted or which you have mvised in accordance with the attached consents to be consister,t with the provisions of 50.54(p).
In the I
instance of those changes which we have identified as decreasing security, j
you may choose to submit a request for change regarding those items under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.90.
e l
We have detemined that the enclosure to your above referenced letter and l
the enclosum to this letter contain information of a type specified in 10 CFR 2.790(d) and should be withheld from public disclosure.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
F. A. Varga Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Licensing l
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/o enclosure:
8112010234 s11112 See next page PDR ADOCK 05000334 F
PDR i
i
/^
j ECURIIT-RELATED INFURMA111NI l
l
.E..R.B..#.1...:.D..L......
. O..RB,..* ).lf.....
..................[SjCLQ$URE($)..Q([Y..CONTAIN(S).
OFFICE )
I cu==r >..D.C.h,gn;.@..
...S.
rSA M..CER.2..H0.(xI)...INE0RMU01L..............
.....l..//o.../. 8.1.....
...1.....o..1....
l oney Ne ronu ais oo aoi nacu om J
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom i i-me
e er S*
Mr. J. J. Carey Duquesne Light Company cc: Mr. H. P. Williams Mr. J. D. Sieber, Manager Station Superintendent Nuclear Safety and Licensing Duquesne Light Company Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley Power Station Nuclear Division Post Office Box 4 Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. T. D. Jones, Manager Resident Inspector Nuclear Operations U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Duquesne Light Company Post Office Box 298 Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 B. F. Jones Memorial Library 663 Franklin Avenue Aliquippa, Pennsylvania 15001 Gerald Charnoff, Esquire Jay E. Silberg, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1600 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Karin Carter, Esquire Special Assistant Attorney General Bureau of Administrative Enforcement 5th Floor, Executive House Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Marvin Fein Utility Counsel City of Pittsburgh 313 City-County Building Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 Mr. John A. Levin Public Utility Commission P.O. Box 3265 l
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Irwin A. Popowsky, Esquire Office of Consumer Advocate 1425 Strawberry Square Harr.isburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Charles A. Thomas, Esquire Thomas and Thomas 212 Locust Street Box 999 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108
~
ENCLOSURE A 50-334 BEAVER VALLEY PHYSICAL SECURITY PLAN - REVISION 8 Pace Sec. ion Comments 6-2 6.1.3.b As stated in our' transmittal of March 26, 1981 to Mr. C. N. Dunn, Vice President, Operations Division, "Annanciation of guardhouse portal alarns in the guard room only is contrary to the requirements of 73.55(e)(1)...
In the case of the guardhouse portal alarms, it is especially important that redundant annunciation be provided." Confirm that tnese alarms are provided redundant annunciation.
6-2 6.1.3.d The statement, "This shall not include equipment located inside the continuously manned CAS and SAS" is interpreted to reduce security and is therefore denied as a 50.54(p) change.
SF,0'J:'In*-I'. :aIa I;;r;T"C! CIT 10 CE 2.79u(d) IITFG!a:IO:-
.