ML20032C279
| ML20032C279 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/19/1981 |
| From: | Oller R, Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032C273 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900372 NUDOCS 8111090587 | |
| Download: ML20032C279 (14) | |
Text
.
ORGANIZATION: ANACONDA-ERICCSON COMPANY CONTINENTAL WIRE AND CABLE YORK, PENtGYLVANIA REPORT NO.: 99900372/81-01 INSPECTION DATE(S): 9/15-18/81 INSPECTION ON-STTE HOURS: 25 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: Anaconda-Ericcson Company Wire and Cable Division ATTN: Mr. D. O. Bostrom Manager, "uality Assurance East 8th Street Marion, Indiana 46952 ORGANIZATION CONTACT:
Mr. A. M. Coggeshall, Plant QA Manager TELEPHONE:
717-792-2644 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT:
High Temperature Electrical Wire and Cable NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Approximately seven percent of the Continental Wire and Cable plant sales are for the nuclear industry.
(
l 1bb \\
O AW dt-(#"l9-bI ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
R. E. OLler, Comfonents Section (CS)
Date g
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
~
APPROVED BY:
O
[
WW (0 ' li-@l U. Potapovs, Acting Chit f, lCS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
1.
BASES:
10 CFR Par 50, Appendix B; and 10 CFR Part 21, 2.
SCOPE: Status of previous inspection findings; manufacturing process control; cnange control; nonconformances and corrective action; and 10 CFR Part 21.
DESIC, gED CRIGINAL M
g <e
,,3 py 8111090597 811022 ANAC O
ANACONDA-ERICCSON COMPANY ORMNMON:
CONTINENTAL WfRE AND CABLE YORK, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT NO.:
99900372/81-01 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 5 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
Contrary to the corrective action commitment in the Anaconda-Ericcson response letter dated September 12, 1979, 17 procedures, identified in the Manufacturing Instruction No. 8, dated August 12, 1976, an index for instructions applicaole to extrusion equipment, had not been written.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Deviation A (79-01):
It appeared from paragraphs 5.1., 1.11.1., and Exhibit No.1 of the Anaconda Topical Report AWC-75-A, Revision 1, that the Plant QA Manage. reported to a pcsition level equivalent to the Plant Manager, however, the person to whom he reported; i.e., the Power Cable Manager of Quality Assurance, did not have total responsibility for a manufacturing facility.
The inspector verified that in accordance with Anaconda's response letter dated September 12, 1979, the Topical Report AWC-75-A, Revision 1, was revised to clarify the above condition.
The current Revision 3 of the topical report, paragraph 1.4., " Plant Quality Assurance," and Exhibit 1, now describes the Plant QA manager as reporting to the Plant Manager for administrative operation of his department, and to the Wire and Cable Divi.
sion Manager of QA for functional operation of his department.
This arrangement allows him sufficient authority to assure that quality require-ments are maintained.
2.
(Closed) Deviation B (79-01):
It appears that Inspection Proceudre No. 524, dated April 6,1978, had not been reviewed and approved by the York Plant prior to issue as required by paragraphs 2.4.1. and 2.4.5. of the Anaconda Topica' Report AWC-75-A, Revision 1.
The inspector verified that, as a result of further information supplied in Anaconda's response letter dated September 12, 1979, review of paragraphs 6.1, and 6.1.1. of the topical report and discussions, that the above matter is no longer considered a deviation.
The Wire and Cable Division Manager-QA has responsibility for final approval of new or revised inspection proce-dure..
Review and comment copies are sent to the Plant QA Manager and then returned to the Wire and Cable Division Manager-QA.
He then signs and issues the final approved copy to the Plant GA Manager.
ANACONDA-ERICCSON COMPANY CONTINENTAL WIRE AND CABLE ORGAN 1'ZATION:
VORK, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT NO.: 99900372/81-01 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 5 3.
(Closed) Deviation C (79-01):
It appeared that five test methods had not been reviewed and approved by the York Plant prior to issue as required by paragraphs 2.5.1. and 2.5.5. of the Anaconda Topical Report AWC-75-A, Revision 1.
The inspector verified that, as a result of further information supplied in Anaconda's response letter dated September 12, 1979, review of paragraphs 6.1. and 6.1.1. of the topical report and discussions that this matter is no longer considered a deviation.
Test methods are reviewed and. approved in the same manner as for inspection procedures as previously identified.
4 (Closed) Deviation D (79-01):
Failure by the Chief or Senior Specification Engineer and the QA Manager to initial, as approved, on five Engineerine Notices (ens) as required by paragraph 3.2.3. of the Anaconda Topical Raport AWC-75-A, Revision 1.
The inspector verified that in accordance with Anaconda's response letter, dated September 12, 1979, the forms for the ENS and Standard Instructions (sis) manufacturing process tags used at the York Plant, have been re-vised by adding <iated signoff blocks for initialing by the Plant QA Manager, Engineering Supervisor and the Specification Engineer.
Review of six current EN process tags for safety related orders, verified that these tags were properly initialed.
5.
(Closed) Deviation E (79-01):
Failure to properly complete the fronts and/or backs of Production Tags for five traceability items, as required by paragraph III.e. of Inspection Standard Practice No. 2000.
The inspector verified that in accordance with Anaconda's response letters dated September 12, 1979 and February 19, 1980, that to prevent failure by test and production per onnel to complete the required entries, new tags, with all of the requircments on one side only, have been put into use, and personnel have been reinstructed in their use.
The Standard Practice No. 2000 has been replaced by Standard Practice SP-2012, dated June 11, 1981, "Traceabi l i ty. " Observations in the shop verified that the new production tags are beging completed as required.
6.
(0 pen) Deviation F (79-01):
Failure to provide 17 procedures (instructions) for inprocess control of extrusion equipment identified in Manufacturing Instruction No. 8, Section 0 Index, and required by paragraph 5.1. and its subparagraph "a." of the Anaconda Topical Report AWC-75-A, Revision 1.
The inspector determined that contrary to Anaconda's commitment in their response letter, dated September 12, 1979, that the 17 procedures applicable to extrusion equipment, have not been written.
See Notice of Nonconfor-mance.
ANACONDA-ERICCSON COMPANY CONTINENTAL WlRE AND CABLE ORGANIZATION: YORK, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT NO.: 99900372/81-01 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 5 7.
(Closed) Deviation G (79-01):
Failure by the Chief or Senior Specification Engineer to initial as approved, five ens prior to distribution, as required by paragraph 3.5.1. of the Anaconda Topical Report AWC-75-A, Revision 1.
The inspector verified that in accordance with Anaconda's response letters dated September 12, 1979, and February 19, 1980, that the same corrective action as taken for the previous Deviation D has been implemented for this matter.
E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS 1.
Manufacturing Process Control - The inspector reviewed five sections of the Anaconda-Ericcson Topical Report AWC-75-A, Revision 3, which were applicable to material receiving, manufacturing, and inspection and test, of high temperature electrical cables.
Observations were made of inprocess work on single and multiconductor cables including receiving inspection, insulating, cabling, shielding, low-voltage testing, and final elec:rical testing.
Review included: two customer's order documents; an overall inspection and test procedure; nine manufacturing process tags attached to reels of cable in various stages of inspection and test, and the related reports.
Within this area, no nonconformances to NRC, customer order or QA program requirements were identified, and no unresolved items were identified.
2.
Change Control - The inspector reviewed Section 3.0, " Design Control," of the AE Topical Report AWC-75-A, Revision 3, which was applicable to changes in design and manufacturing process activities.
A review was made of three Standard Practice Procedures and the related change records covering: Engineering Change Notice Control, Production Deviation Reports and QA Test Sheet changes to verify that changes in engineering and production activities which resulted from customer requests, engineering review, production deviations, and QA electrical tests and inspections, were adeauately controlled.
The records reviewed included oric',a1 and revised manufacturing process EN and SI tags, Engineering Char.e Notices, Customer Change Requests, Production Deviation Reports, original and revised Electrical Test Sheet records.
Within this area, no nonconformances to NRC, customer order, or QA program requirements were identified.
3.
Nonconformances and Corrective Action - The inspector reviewed two sections of the AE Topical Report AWC-75-A, Revision 3, which were applicable to the control and disposition of deficiencies in inprocess electrical cables and those long-term deficient conditions which required disposition by the Corrective Action Committoa.
ANACONDA-ERICCSON COMPANY CONTENENTAL E5ZRE AND CABLE ORGANIZATION:
VORK, PENNSVLVANTA REPORT NO.: 99900372/81-01 INSPECrlON RESULTS:
PAGE 5 of 5 To verify that nonconforming items were reviewed and accepted, rejected, re-paired or reworked, and that conditions adverse to quality, including the ca.use, are promptly identified and corrected, a review was made of:
seven stop tags attached to reels of cables segregated in "Stop Tag" hold areas, and the related records.
The records included seven Notice of Nonconforming Material Reports and other pertinent records.
Review also included ten reports of Material Review Board Meetings for the period of August 28, 1981 through September 9,1981, and one log sheet covering six reports of Corrective Action Committee Meeting actions for the period of March 20, 1981 through May 22, 1981.
Within this arc'., no nonconformances to NRC, customer order, or QA program requirements were identified, and no unresolved items were identified.
4.
10 CFR Part 21 - The inspector reviewed the AE Procedure No. WCP-01, dated June 2,1981, to verify that documented measures were available to meet the reporting requirements of 10 CFR Part 21.
Observations were made of the bulletin board where posted copies of Article 206 of the Energj Reorganization Act of 1974, and the above AE Procedure No. WCP-01 were maintained.
Within this area, no violations were identified.
portet no, gem vu Inspector
- E 4%hr R:portflo. fr-e.-
Scrpe/Hodule S U /cf c[ /YN 75 Page / of
<F DOCUMENTS EXAMINED fo.. /m.
r gg
?n sp<crin,
/
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
Y hv <w fo N r espoca s,
/pffs, s,sG/e/9.e-79 a.r/2 ir-se
/:
& tfc c, w,f,o,,,Q ne,f Ac.?yP 7 3'7Z/7?-O'
"'A di,e < c n /9 M i r a /, b u,$' 4 i: C - ? f-A, fr% vigics, /
l 2'
i f
e' s; n < r.,, /,.
5 &sscu No /ca /Abrei 1 A W-75-A, Sh+5/W 3
'%c4 /Rf/
3 T,c n a e 4 r :. 49cr -n'r ce do.52k' 4~' M At 9
i E'
G'
"'<?I??:/Nefur ti c f% ce s c hcs 4 & L M ~/" 7F?'
/
EA/ - w 765 ) F M~/4 7fs' /F-(/ - / 2,e, C,G
,fA,~ /97 7G
/
swc/f 4 - /n ? 7/
twria r M4-6 v
c xi.,di o / n a e //c c snzw2 ab s A.
7' P
Abc ds c d-ris,c _t+ cm s s 7ecc &, C'rc4 v s res.
f 2 d6 f/'f h s,/6 %
h/c7/
y., escu 5 LA.
/
3 A5"O ufs r-lc. 7 / w _7,, c:fru r //c i, M-S ' E x fr u s is >>
y-2-75 HM-
/
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
Q;i Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessa'y) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
emn7Mm5Wom ew
]nsp::ct:r f i^.GHer Report Ib. pi-c/
Page 2 of f 2 cope /Modslo M'r&Schr/nv /9erF55 DOCUMENTS EXAHINED
~
cw%/
J l
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
f
/fea ccnh -fr 4 sscir Tcsirr / (%w,/ A w c-75-A s e e r'i c /> s 55
/r
// of m n,el 199/
3 y
2 3'
fi$ p b re Es. 5fv-/
Gn era / 7's cpe c;/ eii /// 7?? qY
/
IVsi r> /s ro fche - f'e r &
?-2 7-[/
O S/ainA nl }/>Su/b /ec f
3 C
(vs4iner Grb r Fn h u,,,,/ ri> << /a //<v, te fli d, 7 7 G-1
//M $22926-2 c M C Grbr.w.0.5*- 7205E f-3/4/
MA.
rei,!rarc / va.
x 5
cc, c d-ni-i c,- by ?>, 4 ~
(e*,Fi,nbic #< /p, s,,/SM Sn ee;l'i-eet!/r1% ?l hee.nin.,f 'k h 2 Jo f*fr /k/bs,en-n;a s 7'17edru 6>/rs' /!i', CG 70G-fs.c~ tu f c-Grc/ci A&. e 7? cts'?
r-2 C-F/
NA.
5 N.? cob rlorsir e fro rp.; s s c; c s-
~
S2-Et? cP $fcf ~'2 ~2F fN Cs'/Fi c 3'- 7/7C_3 s
ra r ic e S 4, A
'5Z -Enre-frco /z-/z r fer afer e3-7/ 7c~s o
q SI~ Enc t - Sccr-i~ - 9
< er 9,/er 09-7/.5'2 9 l
l rw -/ w r m re r Gr/ei c.,-scv/3 l
\\
SI-t A c& Sfcv-M-7 th< G*r/e r a 3 - 2 M'Z2 l
l RZ ~ 2,9 c P -SA'#-//- 3 3 fcrc?a e r C 7-7/758
\\
l t
r < - M 3 /7-T ler G r frr es 3 - 7/C2 5 M
- & - ta fe?- 3 fer cirhi o 3 - 7p?7 JO r ic c/ s A. A Document Types
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequentia? Item Number 2.
Specifica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of D',cument 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
J
l Inspector 5f. 0!lrr Docket tio.9'75'cc'372 4
Report flo. //-c'/
Scope / Module Nto [ar [cr/d [_d yf (55 9OCUMENTS EXAMINED l
ds?lst'/
l l
i 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 j
5 fc'? Orhr $*, 0.3-7/7f3 -l
_7s> cc>nts, p T/>_ wc' //t'n,0 c5 7-25*
f
-,f m
k r f c.*r lc, c fc's o s c.l //>Sc) ct /ks,
??I/c?
7-27-2/
A'A y
Y
/_
F*er
- Crc lft 4.
- cG ~7/ 7Gj'u2 _.?)> CcM/W y_ )>Spe cf/cdi f(fjr[l_ _ 732/- ff
[r r cc* /rc/cic-les a/,/ / rrs c'l //c>> j>p he=rscr /s g / f/
/l,.sf, 7
l 9
f Fes Gnh, so o 9-7'3 2y
.d e w / 9 / % p 7e s / J o;- Bcv /
_g-/g-s i N /9 _
7&-sfth, red #
l
'7 5
G Gis&'s /K. c' 3 -CCF/3
.zete.- /M o pp 36555 3-so 5's N A.
/s J
Fer Gr/p/,q,,oE-v/6 5 9 4 4 /A,a. 4 c o lbccs>>s/>c In jn<=r //c) erY W ~$'
f/3 frr Arc'I's
/ ~2JM /
NA l
l
- s. zo cc - n w ec/rc- & ~/ u-eenz n, a M hr Sb/N-/l.j
/-3-8/
NA.
/
/
/
o
\\
L~/rcVr / ca /
7e"> / JQpc r f 7-/'t J'/
fA.
s.
R _ 97ch r Ac. ca 3 - 7/ 2 b, _.7/r?3_,_ge= e /W, F/~ /
//
f E /e c fr i cn f 7ec/ fasc-n P-//-S /
- .4 e
/?-
P fe* r D n'4r 12.. c= 3 - 7/4 P9.
7bsi*/
f, o /4 2 7
F//>a /1-/s e 7r' i cp / T& -7' ifep c>r 7' E-26-J'/
A/, A
/?
f for G7ch r,q,. c?? 7/75f
, 7 /c,n d'z ~'.
Fiac< / Eh c~'r ' c a / Yes -/ Wep c r 7'~
"'s 4 /
xA.
I Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number i
2.
Specifica tion 6.
Internal tiemo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedurc 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicabie)
/krtrerM, w w ~N i z Onsp;ctcr
- E,ONer Report flo.' re-v/
' 9 ' *' E 3 cope /Hodule C/c'7 " l'"frc l DOCUMElfTS EXAHillED I
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 Sec f cn 1 o "/>.= sig i, Gs. frc?/[
?l,rc4,iPf/
2
/
f A-E Tco/ca/Peperi Awr-75A.
i J
2 T
5% n k<</ A,J ? ~ r,'si c,
/% cl h ca. D'-/ w/ %;,,,pe vi om i
l l
/'o ris c, fciifrc7/ "
/-/r-r/
AA (Aesocs I>GM:ss c re4 4,/ decv.,,en4 i
"?
.9 742 P"e, u /b. Jf,-riis c Bv <-p s n 77w F4/ ~/4/Cc?, 7789 Eiv o.
c"4 a epe; kc. / /
,., c.
g
- / - wy 7~ c'
- -"7F
- A.
A. frisi ew / f#< fro rea s a
C b -s ( Ch4, sw. G 2-4:,cb 5' I/e/o "32 A 4 -
</. T w (4x >c o e/ G 7,f<ae f M ecwc/
5~ P-J'c M A-r c >>,, 4.- r&/ fc 4' Ni m S 2 7 E' ^
4' A.
.?
j'. fib l/&c/ /%n= c s Ga F-23-ec nA.
N __
3 has'Ni / Es,e inwrh?c kac bre ik' S/L /P/2,
"/4cWc'cbc! )A w) br>> /% cif/'PJ/? ) he ce clI/W.c
7 Fo mA.
5 9
n &<c-/>L re fs % / </v e e/.Neds.-
e. /% !4 e v' c's, dnn a 4cz, ;f%c~< f Ar
/'dh F22 H-/?-f'c
.u 4 er
- 4. Engin ee r ine CAa ra re M-fice to. 9/2 S P /
nA NYdt hw l-Cf3 Yh/d D u Y2 c lr,n't 'rt Q ffc (PG 's NQ E C - /2 7 0" ]
A' h,
- ~
< < ~.
c
/
J Doct ment Types:
Columi;:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Ntsnber 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of 90cument 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) i 1
UULLEL lld s n cru
! Inspector
,#' 5. 6//r' Report flo f <-c -
!Sc:pe/Hodu1a C Aa"ce GJ,c /
Page 5 of $
DOCUMENTS EXAMINED s
I 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 S
'3
.s~!s ed!n / G'A f'ra c ficr,ce.
2('- 2c7/f ~md 5/ rep 7 n,%:/w uat/]swe= ' ',
ppyi tv A.
i
?
l F>=/A w/nc 1p A7 /stf,/r e c >>r enz /5
-n= //.5%c / F & - /47W/
p -Ji -r /
- , A.
a 4,
Me v uth elo < n e < P,c7 ress 7~<ry Dr /y 7f h c7 25%t M4-l Y
f re //:~ iir r se/n fbcf fe.cc,sra,.u'/s v
a.f>c/i><.c<w,e n%,ee do//?r ycc -72 3
+ -/C-F/
N A-J.
7$ / SAb / b -/vcs?, c 4 a,, w w s-r' s, A
-e
- / si i,<< / L=/G - /36 y 5 2 -z T-79 A'A.
/ pf!ica.d Wm / Sj',A-/ Ed','3G f.S o -M-J'/
A' A.
'?
?
la 7b <r ' -/ <~ r,s s>rf A'l c F*c-/G i>>c
.v s*>]/>er/>r -,
c%i.,ce JD/A r Ecn/ - S'S G 2-25;b>
HA o
/. 6/ONAal A$r/rwc/J's> 7p s / S 4 w 7'
/2 <- 76
- A.
- 8 yksc5m ras.: + 'abe-7'
&zG-P /
4A.
x, Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) e 9
e
~~
~
nspectcr # E. v//gr mc page g of 3, yccpe/Hodu12 Aui> <enNoxances ca/
DOCUMENTS EXAHillED correc4ee Ac /<e,
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 i-E mrEa / Seiz,,-Y.4a c A, Secliciis /5. 0 a s /,p c He<f fRF/
3
/
H t
2 9
c ren % c_c /s*z1 nrMrc 4J b (c/d: wk m:/%/frforf Airfdr
~
)
et & rccuf}rn,is, s Mr & rh / &<v, th ('s:-fs:n ),a /WAer re<< n/s ers N//cw S ?
<u.s'[L, 2 76,?/ fer cnd'r 0. 0% 7/ v65 reat n' 4-
~
4 2 & ='f A M',4*&i v r Y 7 /f-Er A'- A 6Jr & % l ".}>'sss;ic,x/ hw A.O'tro lcEw+t 7-/ 7-[t 4A-a,3
/>, / SZ d '- 2 % YSC f e r O v r$<? r Ac, C'6-ff3/$
A/ A.
j,, z b/ mv n,,,,, +
c-22-[J MA t, v.
4 dors
.fi/r-Jhs>ce f h-075c)
(-2 -5 /
sc A.
<,/ 5 r4u, 23 cw 47 Yr/e r A2>-
09-7'53 C p zS4 /
%A
.e, 2 A -f d'N fa,vrt' pas-Tr Ar-A.
d, /
S E 4. 23 73 7 9-<7-Fi xs A,
t"l
- 2 4'
- f V W ( uJu/st c)r/pt'/nlf Ch l nc A a/ Sr a 2L?of
'G7 d'/pr #c c'3-Q 3'c2
.2-/4//
s.A
_y z A'of M*1 <fk< rt 2-re -6/
AA Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-f f necessary) 4.
Revisica (If applicable)
UoriGL Ilo, vwco3 22 Inspector n' E *. G % r Report Ib. r>~ c s page 7 of H Sc:pe/ Module A'" ccd e >>ia o ce s c' /
GrrecIn e A c h r -i
~00.'UMENTS EXAMIriED 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
-Ei -C r.1:,. 2297 V f*- > Gr csk e (v. c 3 - cs T. 2 x'-/7 1 0 mA 4^ 2
,f sf f M, fl-,v, r '
/c'-/7 Et:
A: A to 23
- 2. P /~c i Cat' s do. c'.3 - GJ' 3 2 2.
2 8 /
f.,4
_ C. / SC?:
r
- c. 7 1 < / P i e7' p o r 7'
? SL
/,/F-a
/
f7's &r sa f 1b c '<E w j?c c7 rcr'Mpa /isi ci s
?]
<V 7hn bri e r / <; eT
/
r r'A' o-, m/ s f~ f-? s'-/ / //,co g 1: </- s? -2 /
s'.,-ic e s AaA.
^.+ e i a
c:/ rr 5 < <wr c c ue 'r ing re r re c U, ve Ac f, c/
c~o,n, / Y/<=e >A?,4' c h a ric ?
6'
/
,Gs n_,v, Y e sF i,
cp I
-07 7XN s h ~r ric ) W
- ?- 2C-#/ J/ re cn ],
_c,, 2 t? /
Vt.* nc'c's bA,
./
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Ite Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document j
4.
QA Manual.
8.
Other (Specify-if recessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
Docket 180. Wrar.g7(,
Inspector A' E. O //es Report flo. f[F 1
f-of Page / of Scope / Module /# ( F/T ra>/ 2/- - - -
DOCUMENTS EXAMIrlED i
l i
I 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
_4
/
3
/1-E l'r e ce fuw, k>.
wc F-C'/ _
Q/ h repGiw S r libr c - Yi H r Cv Jn/. s hens-n;4,cA ce' ns nfoX-A sudsta ?ba/ '_
Sa fe fu //ct 2 as / li> Arcerffinre W'//r /c r F/t* 2 / "
6'2-f '
- A-
/
i l
l i
i i
l I
1 Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Speci fica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 1
4.
QA Manual P
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
i o
PERSONS CONTACTED ife.1 cesidt - fricsscn.? n r.
Y"~'Ek' Ccmpany C o " f'k'0 " !a / n w
- Ca N * [ " Ct -
Ca tes Occket/ Report No. f#f00 372/6W'_/'
Inscector
- E. C//g r I
Page /
of /
- '1AME(Please Print)
TIRE (Please 'rint)
ORGANIZATION (Please Drint)
A A &:u,-/)>v7 s?
Sucei 1:/Sc r - Spp c /fi ca feh A, i%ArcGrary E2 7 Ocnf-
,i
./
s A, M. c erecv da //
P A n:->'?a r ei-si'A. bc=,cf
.s fiW b G l' /)
$)/C/J'PPf/J?S s7/,'s2f P T h/7fJ)G'P!fs'f
/
J
/
/
J N? (T.
/*/ OJ?!d f )? C fJ.'l '#lG /,'O Y f Y
/
M k!/ swr 2.,'t*/)?Y/ c? h>1ch3
$? c7 EX/l WF WYht F-s h
I